Transgender teen commits suicide. My thoughts.

Before I begin this post, I just want to make it clear that I’ll be making no attempts to interject my usual brand of humour. Given the circumstances of what I’m about to discuss, it would hardly be appropriate to joke around right now, and I’d prefer to be as respectful as possible.

I’m just after reading a story about a biological male by the name of Joshua, who identified as a female by the name of Leelah who recently took their life (out of respect for this person’s feelings, I won’t say “his life”, but at the same time based on my own beliefs, I don’t feel comfortable saying “her life” either, hence why I’m choosing the gender neutral pronoun instead).

The story can be read about here.

Joshua “Leelah” Alcorn

Like any suicide, this is undoubtedly a tragedy, and my thoughts go out to the friends and family who they left behind and I’m sure are devastated right now. However, I think it’s important that we don’t allow our emotional response to this tragedy to cloud our judgement on matters, and try to maintain rationality as much as possible.

Many people claim that they know from early childhood that their brain doesn’t match their body and that they struggle for years trying to come to terms with who they are. Joshua/Leelah was no exception to this, and claimed that they they had been confused about their gender since at least the age of four. When they finally found out about transgenders, it was a feeling of relief for them because they finally felt that they understood who they were (btw, I apologise if using “them”, “they” and “their” for a single individual is confusing. I’ll explain the reason why I’m doing so later).

Unfortunately for them, their parents were not the most understanding of people (to say the least). They were conservative Christians, with conservative Christian values. As far as they were concerned, their child just had to accept who they were, because that was the way God wanted it. Eventually after several years of severe depression and without the love and support to get through it, they committed suicide a few days ago. Before doing so, they left a not online to explain why, which can be found here

I’m just going to go through a few parts of the note and give my response to it.

Please don’t be sad, it’s for the better. The life I would’ve lived isn’t worth living in… because I’m transgender. I could go into detail explaining why I feel that way, but this note is probably going to be lengthy enough as it is. To put it simply, I feel like a girl trapped in a boy’s body, and I’ve felt that way ever since I was 4. I never knew there was a word for that feeling, nor was it possible for a boy to become a girl, so I never told anyone and I just continued to do traditionally “boyish” things to try to fit in.

I think it’s awful that you felt this way. I really don’t envy what you went through.

When I was 14, I learned what transgender meant and cried of happiness. After 10 years of confusion I finally understood who I was. I immediately told my mom, and she reacted extremely negatively, telling me that it was a phase, that I would never truly be a girl, that God doesn’t make mistakes, that I am wrong.

I might cause offence here (none intended I assure you) but while I disagree with how the mother handled the situation (I think it was terribly harsh and unnecessarily hurtful), I am of the belief that a true sex change is biologically impossible (at least with our current understanding of medicine). The way I see it at present, a male can’t be made into a female. Performing surgery on their genitalia and pumping them full of the opposite sexes hormones is just going to turn them into a feminised male with irreparably mutilated genitalia. I’m not saying this to be bigoted. I’m not saying this to be hurtful. I’m just saying that if we’re supposed to believe that a trans-female is as much a female as someone born that way, then the burden of proof is on those who say it is possible, not on those who believe it isn’t. That’s just how burden of proof under the scientific method works.

If you are reading this, parents, please don’t tell this to your kids. Even if you are Christian or are against transgender people don’t ever say that to someone, especially your kid. That won’t do anything but make them hate them self. That’s exactly what it did to me.

I agree, I think a child needs to feel loved and supported in a situation like this. There has to be a gentler way to deal with it, even if you don’t feel comfortable with it.

My mom started taking me to a therapist, but would only take me to christian therapists, (who were all very biased) so I never actually got the therapy I needed to cure me of my depression. I only got more christians telling me that I was selfish and wrong and that I should look to God for help.

I do think therapy is the right approach, but obviously, competent therapists who want to help, rather than judge. This clearly didn’t happen in this case.

So they took me out of public school, took away my laptop and phone, and forbid me of getting on any sort of social media, completely isolating me from my friends. This was probably the part of my life when I was the most depressed, and I’m surprised I didn’t kill myself. I was completely alone for 5 months. No friends, no support, no love. Just my parent’s disappointment and the cruelty of loneliness.

A really stupid move on their part. I can’t even begin to imagine how horrible this must have felt.

At the end of the school year, my parents finally came around and gave me my phone and let me back on social media. I was excited, I finally had my friends back. They were extremely excited to see me and talk to me, but only at first. Eventually they realized they didn’t actually give a shit about me, and I felt even lonelier than I did before. The only friends I thought I had only liked me because they saw me five times a week.

And this… I really feel bad for you. I actually can’t find the words to describe the sympathy I feel.

I’m never going to find a man who loves me.

Now this is just something that confuses me. I mean absolutely no offence again, but I think it needs to be said. As a heterosexual male, the idea of being with a trans-female is as off-putting as being in a homosexual relationship and I’d imagine that most heterosexual males would agree. As for homosexuals, I’d assume that it would be as off-putting as being in a heterosexual relationship with a woman. Basically, what I’m saying is, I think a straight man would want a biological woman, and a gay man would want to be with another man. I don’t know what man would be able to love a trans-female. I’m not trying to be insulting, but, I’d just imagine that such a man would be very difficult to find and I think if finding love is that important, you’d be better off living as a gay man, rather than a trans-woman. But then again, it’s really about what’s more important to you.

The only way I will rest in peace is if one day transgender people aren’t treated the way I was, they’re treated like humans, with valid feelings and human rights.

I do think you deserve to be treated with human dignity and respect, but personally at the same time, I agree with Dr. Paul R. McHugh (as I’ve already discussed), that transgenderism is a mental illness and should be treated as such until we understand it better. I think scientific analysis trumps emotions on important issues like this. It’s just a shame that you didn’t get the help and support you needed and deserved.

Gender needs to be taught about in schools, the earlier the better.

I disagree with this part completely. As I said before, we should be helping to raise these people up to the comfort level of everyone else, rather than dragging everyone else down. As I’ve mentioned, we still don’t know what causes transgenderism. For all we know, it could be due to environmental stimuli. I know many people say that your just born that way (an emotion based argument with zero scientific evidence), but then these same people contradict themselves by then saying gender is a social construct. So which is it? Are you born with your gender, or is it a social construct? But I digress. The point I wanted to make is this. The vast majority of kids seem to be perfectly attuned to their biological sex. I see no reason to confuse every other child who is comfortable with who they are, in order to cater to the small minority who aren’t. If transgenderism is caused by environmental stimuli, then doesn’t it stand to reason that confusing children about gender, could cause more of them to become transgender themselves? Sounds like nonsense, but it’s not any less credible that saying people are just born that way, without any proof.

Anyway, I’ve said a lot on this topic, so I’ll just sign off here.

Rest in Peace Joshua (AKA Leelah) Alcorn. I hope you’ve found the peace and comfort that you sorely needed.


Stephen’s Day shopping. The slippery slope gets slippier.

Although I’m a relatively young guy myself, I’m still old enough to remember the days before Sunday Trading and late night trading (other than on Thursday nights) for big retailers really took off. Eventually, under the guise of “rights”, big retailers were allowed to extend their opening hours to include these times. However, at least they were still obliged to remain closed on Easter Sunday, Christmas Day and St. Stephen’s Day.

Tesco shareholders looking dismayed at the idea of having their shops closed for 2 days in a row.
Tesco shareholders looking dismayed at the idea of having their shops closed for 2 days in a row.

Then the recession happened. Never allowing a good crisis to go to waste, the big retailers started to claim that they couldn’t afford to close those days and that they needed the boost in business to survive or otherwise they would go bankrupt, or their employees would starve, or that the economy would collapse…or something. So, 2 or 3 years into the recession, they started to open up on Stephen’s Day and my faith in humanity has seen a corresponding drop ever since.

"Please, please let me open on Stephen's Day. At present, I can only afford 3 yachts this year"
“Please, please let me open on Stephen’s Day. At present, I can only afford 3 yachts this year”

I’m just going  cut to the chase and say it outright. It absolutely fills me with disgust to see stores opening today. Christmas is probably the most important date in our calendar and Stephen’s Day has always been an important part of Christmas. Seeing it devalued like this is a disgrace. My childhood memories of Christmas include Stephen’s Day as much as Christmas Day itself. It saddens me to know that if I ever have a family of my own, that when my kids are old enough to get their first part time job (which chances are will be retail), they’ll be forced to sacrifice their own Christmas experience in order to serve the insatiable needs of the shoppers in this country, who a few years back, were perfectly capable of waiting until the 27th to get back to the stores.

Like kids running into a chocolate factory. In fact I’m pretty sure that’s Willy Wonka standing there on the right.

You see as much as I would like to focus on the here and now. As much as I would love to just live in the moment, I just can’t do that. I think longterm, and longterm, I know this will cause me or people I care about unhappiness, even if I don’t have to work the day myself. See, I have something called empathy. Even if I’m insulated personally, I can still feel bad for others.

Sure I’ve already seen friends of mine being forced to work this day and I’ve seen how it’s ruined their holiday. After an exhausting 2 months building up to Christmas, they literally just get the one day off to recover and are then forced in again next day to start all over again. How can this possibly be fair?

You spent all of Christmas day cooking it. You then had to tidy up the dishes used afterwards. I know you were looking forward to just enjoying the leftovers on Stephen’s Day without that hassle but too bad.

I have of course heard all the myths about this day.

Myth 1: People are happy to work the day because it’s extra money over the holidays.

Response: Bullshit. Some people are happy (mainly those who don’t celebrate the holiday) but in my experience, most people who do celebrate the holiday would rather have it off. This is especially true in the cases of those who work in Dublin or the other big cities, but live in the country (ie. a lot of students). These people would rather spend the holidays with their families back home, rather than having to stay in their city dwelling alone, just so they can get into work on time.

Myth 2: It’s voluntary and staff are well compensated.

Response: False. It was voluntary back in the earlier years of its inception, but now it’s just another day. As for the compensation. Obviously I can’t speak for every retailer out there, but from those I do know, it isn’t any better than the average Sunday/Public holiday allowance.

Myth 3: The business needs the money. If they don’t open, they could collapse.

Response: They managed to survive for many years without opening on Stephen’s Day, even the particularly painful first couple of years of the recession. They can survive just fine now. It’s just greed that causes them to open up. Oh and to be blunt, if any business is so on the verge of collapse that they can’t survive not opening on this day, then clearly their business model is bust, and they should just throw the towel in with dignity and walk away.

Myth 4: It’s not a big deal. Plenty of people already work today like doctors and guards and fire fighters Not to mention people who work in bars and restaurants.

Response: Retail is not an essential service. It can’t be compared to those. As for bars and restaurants, they shouldn’t be forced to work either. I’m well aware of the fact that they’ve been working this day for years. Doesn’t mean that everyone else should be forced to. In my ideal world, they wouldn’t have to do so either.

Myth 5: It’s not a slippery slope at all. Businesses won’t ever start opening up on Christmas Day and Easter Sunday.

Response: Wait a few years and I’ll be proven right in my predication here. As we become a more multicultural and less Christian society, I can guarantee you that at some point there will be a challenge to the sacred position of these two days in our calendar as “Not being representative of modern Ireland” and eventually seeing them given no more importance than Eid or Passover or any other non-Christian holidays. Just you watch. It will happen.

Myth 6: If people aren’t happy working in a job which requires working on Stephen’s Day, they should just go get another job.

This is probably the most condescending arrogance of all. Besides the fact that not everyone is fortunate enough to have the opportunity to just walk in to a job with better terms, there are in fact plenty of people who are paying their dues (either students studying in college, qualified teachers covering a few classes for experience , trained IT specialists doing unpaid internships part time etc) who are working towards getting the job that they really want. Just because they haven’t gotten there yet, does that mean they should be screwed over unnecessarily now? What about when they do eventually move on? Should the next batch of young students who replace them be forced to suffer as well while they work towards getting their own education and experience?

I hope the building falls on top of you.

RIP Stephen’s Day as a day for family and friends. If only we had appreciated you more when we had the chance.

The Asch Experiment

A brilliant experiment which summarises how political correctness works to brainwash people.

As social creatures, we’re hardwired to want to conform with our peers. Going against the thought processes of the group is likely to leave us ostracised from the group. In ancient times when we were part of tribes which relied on one another for survival, this was as good as a death sentence and so, was to be avoided at all costs.

This man was expelled from his tribe for making a racist comment about another tribe. If only he had been more politically correct.

As I’ve already mentioned before, we have have come a long way in terms of technology and society but biologically and psychologically, we’re no different than we were in the Stone Age so the need to be part of the group identity is every bit as strong now as it was back then.

Psychologically, we really aren't that different.
Psychologically, we really aren’t that different.

Therefore, if the popular thing is to be tolerant of everyone else while putting their interests ahead of your own, you can be sure that everyone will want to appear as the most tolerant person of all, even if doing so goes against their better judgement. I mentioned Sweden in my last post as a place which is most badly effected by Cultural Marxism. It’s easy to see why this is. Despite the alarming problems that are going on there, the Swedish Media constantly portrays Sweden as a progressive country that is setting an example for the rest of the unenlightened world with their suicidal policies. Therefore, the youth of Sweden are brought up believing that unrestricted immigration, the abolition of gender as a concept, and all sorts of sexual perversions is the way forward and anyone who thinks otherwise is a bigot.

Remember her? This is the Swedish girl who made a video  pleading with viewers to be more tolerant of paedophiles. Imagine if more people thought like her.
Remember her? This is the Swedish girl who made a video pleading with viewers to be more tolerant of paedophiles. Imagine if the majority of people thought like her.

In Britain, more decent ordinary people marched in protest when Michael Brown (an American) was killed in self defence by Darren Wilson, than those who marched in protest when the scandal in Rotherham (at least 1400 English girls raped by Muslim immigrants over a 20 year period) came out. The only people who protested against that in great numbers were far right groups.

Michael Brown: The innocent cigar thief who was mercilessly killed just because he attacked a cop and tried to take his gun. This is much more outrageous than children being raped.

Why weren’t ordinary people as outraged? Probably because the media didn’t push it as being as outrageous as the former situation. For months we’ve been hearing about how the “innocent child” was gunned down by an evil racist cop, while the media deliberately downplayed the facts about what really happened. People saw the protests about Michael Brown’s death getting such huge coverage and wanted to be a part of that. Meanwhile, the Rotherham situation (a true injustice) is getting less coverage by comparison and so, people don’t feel the need to be part of a group protesting that, even though it is an incident more close to home.

Quick, lets get another Jimmy Saville story printed. It would be racist to report on the crimes of these guys.

It is however important for me to stress that this concept of group identity doesn’t just apply to political correctness. It can be equally effective on the complete opposite end of the scale. Look at Nazi Germany as the obvious example. It may seem hard to believe now with the benefit of hindsight, but the real reason people didn’t speak out against the regime was not due to fear (like in the Soviet Union), but because the majority of people genuinely felt a sense of belonging in that regime and genuinely loved Hitler because that is what the group identity led them to believe was right.

The children loved him…
The elderly loved him.
In fact, most Germans of the time loved him.

This is why I think it’s important for us to always put logic and reason over emotion. I myself am no exception to wanting to feel as if I fit in with the group. Even discussing these topics is hard for me because I always worry that people might take them the wrong way and think that I am a bigoted or unenlightened person. At the same time, I know that I have to trust in my gut feeling and have faith that my peers know me well enough to know the kind of person I really am. I hope everyone else is willing to think the same way and look at the facts objectively, rather than simply following the crowd. I do believe that tolerance and understanding is important in a civilised society, but there has to be boundaries somewhere. If we don’t start to draw the line somewhere, it may end up being too late.

Sweden: The Triumph of Cultural Marxism

Swedish men from the past.
Swedish men from the past.
Swedish men today. What a tragedy.
Swedish men today. What a tragedy.

I vaguely remember writing in a previous blog post that out of all the first world countries that are currently under attack from Cultural Marxism, it seems as if Sweden is particularly badly effected. Then I came across this article here and it woke me up to just how bad the situation really is. What’s most alarming is that this article is from six years ago, so I shudder to think just how much worse it has gotten since then. Lets take a few quotes from the article itself.

the education system should start working for “gender equality” at an early age; children need counterweights to the gender roles which girls and boys are raised into.

I’ve already given my opinion on this sort of brainwashing in my post about the school calling children “Purple Penguins” instead of boys and girls. I thought such brainwashing was absurd then, and it’s absurd now.

Can anyone else see the stupidity of this?
Can anyone else see the stupidity of this?

The schools have no right to indoctrinate impressionable young minds like this. They should be focused on teaching the children useful skills and grading them.

They also want to abolish grades in schools

“We want to do away with the grade system [in today’s schools]. Grades contribute considerably to stress and are not a fair and objective system of measuring the individual’s potential.”

Oh for fuck sake. How are we supposed to differentiate between those with a skillset and those without then? Are we going to send every single child to study medicine at University when they grow up, and then qualify them all as doctors regardless of their competence level, so we don’t cause them stress or hurt their feeling? This is idiotic, plain and simple.

Imagine a hospital full of doctors like Dr. Nick Riviera. That’s what these people want.

“We do not believe in artificial borders. We have a vision of unrestricted immigration and emigration, where people have the right to live and work wherever they please… We want Sweden to become an international role model by producing a plan to implement unrestricted immigration.”

Brilliant. Sure who cares about the legacy that your ancestors built for you? Just piss it all away on every single third world savage that shows up inside your artificial borders.

They have a strong focus on anti-discrimination and racism, and desire harsh and swift penalties for “discrimination” yet soft penalties for many other crimes.

As I mentioned before, Sweden has some of the highest rape statistics in the world, and generally speaking, it’s usually immigrants raping native women. However, this clearly isn’t a serious crime as far as those in power think. Saying mean things to these immigrants is clearly far more worthy of punishment.

The Swedish Green Party state explicitly that the concepts male and female are “socially constructed” and forced upon all human beings. In order to reach the new world order, it is paramount that all such artificial identities are broken down. This should be facilitated by the education system and specially trained teachers. They believe that “all human beings” should be free to choose whatever name they desire. By this they appear to mean “gender” as well. They want everything to be “gender neutral,” not only marriage ceremonies but identity cards.

Can anyone else see the stupidity of this?
I’m posting this again just to reinforce how idiotic this belief is. Why aren’t these people in padded cells?

Anyway, I’m going to move on from the article (the link is still there at the top, read the rest of it, if you’re interested). I need to focus on the next point of this post. Apparently, a Swedish film company are making a film based on the rather obscure character, Captain Sweden. I’d never actually heard of the character myself, but apparently he exists. Check out the trailer, and see if you notice anything unusual about it.

So, did you notice? If not I’ll tell you. It seems that apparently Captain Sweden, who comes from a country in which the native ethnic group is primarily a bunch of blonde-haired, blue-eyed, white people, is being played by a black man.


Can you imagine if someone was to make a Captain *Random African Country* film with a white guy in the titular role? Of course you can’t, because nobody would be stupid or racist enough to do that. But of course, whites are only ever the perpetrators of racism, never the victims, so this is perfectly ok. I think the real reason this is happening is because they know that a white Captain Sweden would be protecting all those white women who are being raped by the 3rd world invaders, just like we can see from the white Captain Sweden in this comic.

I... never mind. Oh Sweden, what is wrong with you?
I… never mind. Oh Sweden, what is wrong with you? This suicidal tolerance you people have needs to come to an end.

The only good thing about Sweden is that the rest of us can study them as an example of the path NOT to follow. Hopefully, people will see what is happening there, will reverse course on the Marxist policies in their own countries and thus, their sacrifice will not be in vain.

EU rules that obesity is now a disability. We can no longer laugh at America.

Will we someday see a version of this cartoon with the bear wearing an EU flag?
Will we someday see a version of this cartoon with the bear wearing an EU flag?

One of the things that most of us find particularly worthy of mockery about America is their catering to the morbidly obese among them, as if these people are somehow victims worthy of special treatment. Well unfortunately, it seems as if the EU has decided to ruin that for us by now classifying obesity as a disability.

20 years ago we laughed at this ridiculous idea being the basis of a Simpsons episode. Now, insane people want to make this a reality.

I’m sorry but what the fuck kind of insanity is this? Are we seriously going to reward people for being a bunch of fat, lazy bastards with no self-discipline? This is absurd, plain and simple. These people shouldn’t be rewarded for their self destructive behaviour. They should be ashamed of themselves for actually being thought of in the same way as people who are paralysed or who are missing limbs. Unlike other disabilities that actually deserve to be called as such, this condition has a cure. It’s called not being a glutton and moving your lazy ass once in a while (Or in more PC terms, eating right and exercise).

South Park had the right idea about how these people should be treated.

I normally don’t give a damn what people do to their own bodies. If they want to destroy themselves then what business is it of mine? However, I do take exception to the fact that classifying this as a disability will probably allow them to park in disabled spaces, because after all, we can’t expect them to actually have to walk a few meters more seeing as exercise is a no-no for these people. Also, you can be sure that we’ll probably end up following America’s example by allowing these people to use mobility scooters which currently are reserved for genuinely disabled people. A waste of tax payer’s money if ever I heard one.

Jabba The Hutt’s fatter, less attractive brother here should be ashamed of himself, for taking away an expensive scooter which should be given to someone who actually needs it.

The fact that this behaviour is incentivised actually shocks me. I’ve said it before that society cares more about not hurting the feelings of people, rather than accepting an obvious reality. I mean what’s really more important? Making sure we don’t hurt the feelings of morbidly obese people, or encouraging them to become healthier so that they might actually get to live a longer, more fulfilling, and more productive life? In case it isn’t obvious already, I lean towards the latter. We already treat smokers like pariahs in our societies by forcing them to go outside in the cold to smoke, by taxing them into oblivion, and by constantly reminding them of the danger of their habit. Why shouldn’t we do the same with obesity?

You are what you eat.

I actually think it would be a good idea to turn to Japan for inspiration. Did you know that in Japan, it’s now illegal to be overweight? No really, watch this.

I’m not suggesting we should be as strict about it as the Japanese are, but we should at least be strict enough that you must be slim enough to NOT need a mobility scooter to get around.

Then read a bit more about it right here.

I’m sure the usual crowd of whiners would be out complaining about  the “nanny-state” if this were to happen here. Fuck them. These hypocrites are the same kind of people who would be lobbying Social Media to ban hurtful words, lobbying stores to stop selling violent videogames, or who would be in favour of the draconion holocaust denial laws in so many countries, so I can’t take their opinions on the nanny-state seriously.

Cultural Marxism: A definition.

Cultural Marxism in a nutshell.
Cultural Marxism in a nutshell.

I’ve come to the realisation that I’ve used the term Cultural Marxism an awful lot in this blog, but I’ve never actually defined what it is. I’m sure most people who have been reading this blog will have already long since looked it up, but for those who haven’t, here’s a definition.

Karl Marx: Quite possibly the worst human being in history.

As the name suggests, Cultural Marxism originates from Marxist theories. For those unfamiliar with Marxism, it is essentially the template for Communism, the abolition of class based societies in which everyone is technically an equal and the means of production are shared by everyone. Of course we know from history that in practice this was bullshit. Communist societies such as the Soviet Union, Red China, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc., caused human misery and destruction on a scale unlike anything else ever seen in human history.

Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin: Two monsters who may never have gotten anywhere if not for Karl Marx and his theories.

Cultural Marxism essentially applies Marxist theories to cultural aspects of a society rather than the economic aspects of it for the purpose of destroying everything that they consider wrong about that society. Instead of looking to abolish class differences, Cultural Marxism looks to abolish race, gender, sexuality, religious etc. differences in societies. This is done mainly through the use of their most effective weapon of all…political correctness.

Most reasonable people would of course have no problem with any of this and would in fact be perfectly in favour of such equality for all. The problem is much like how Communists lied about creating an equal society without class differences, Cultural Marxists lie about creating an equal cultural society.

Instead, in a Cultural Marxist world, what we would regard as “normal” aspects of culture is undermined in favour of that which we would consider to be abnormal or alien to our culture. For example, in a society with one predominant race and other minorities, the minorities are unfairly favoured over the majority when it comes to discrimination. An obvious example right now is America. Whenever a black criminal is killed by cops (even in cases were the cop only does so in self defence), it isn’t unusual for the black citizens to riot and attack white people just for being white. Yet this is not condemned by Cultural Marxists, or if it is, they’ll find some way to blame it all on whites somehow.

Cultural Marxists accept this as being ok…provided it’s minorities who are doing it.
It's perfectly acceptable for minorities to be proud of who they are, but white people must never take such pride in a Cultural Marxist world.
It’s perfectly acceptable for minorities to be proud of who they are, but white people must never take such pride in a Cultural Marxist world.

The same can be said for religion. We’ve all seen Christianity (the dominant religion in Europe for the past 2000 years) being attacked by feminists for being misogynistic because they don’t allow female priests and are opposed to abortion. It’s also attacked by homosexuals for being against gay marriage. Compare this to how Islam (a minority religion in Europe for now) is treated. This is a religion in which women are treated as the property of their husbands in many cases and are forced to cover themselves from head to toe, and homosexuals are killed by stoning, and it’s never attacked to the same degree as Christianity, because it doesn’t suit the agenda of Cultural Marxists to attack this religion as it isn’t a big part of European Culture.

“The Catholic Church doesn’t like gay marriage. That’s much worse for Gay people than stoning them to death”~ Marxists

Sexuality is not off limits to Cultural Marxists. Most of us are tolerant these days of homosexuality and inter-racial relationships, and we would look back at our ancestors who opposed these things as being less enlightened than us. I’m all in favour of the rights of homosexuals and inter-racial couples myself, but the fact of the matter is, there was a time when society was as opposed to these things as we would be to paedophilia or beastiality. I’m not in any way suggesting that homosexuality or inter-racial relationships are a perversion like those. I’m just simply stating that the opposition they faced was the same.

Can you imagine a world in which our descendants accept paedophilia and beastiality as being normal orientations, and look back at us as being unenlightened bigots? Unfortunately, I can. I truly believe that at some point, Cultural Marxists will try to promote these things as being normal.

To sane people, this is a joke. To Cultural Marxists, this is a real civil rights movement in the making.

Sure, look at this video from Sweden (world Capitol of Cultural Marxism) to see a preview of things to come. The girl distinguishes between Paedophiles and Child Molestors, but in doing so, she runs the risk of gradually helping to normalise a disorder that should not be normalised under any circumstances.

This poor brainwashed girl probably thinks she’s being tolerant and understanding. In reality, she’s defending a bunch of sick freaks who should be monitored by authorities at all time. I wonder how she would feel if she had children herself.

The most important thing to remember is this. The big lie about Political Correctness is that it’s about raising the standards of underprivileged groups to that of the privileged. In fact the opposite is what occurs.What they actually do is drag the standards of the privileged down to the level of the (allegedly) underprivileged in the hopes of undermining everything that is good and pure about that society.

Cultural Marxism cannot create anything of benefit. It can only destroy. That’s why I think it’s important that when it comes to issues of political correctness, vs an obvious reality, we must always remember that the obvious reality is what we should put our trust in. For the sake of our future and that of our descendants, it is essential that we never forget this.

The War on Christmas: Because European/American societies have no rights to traditions.

In light of the fact that we’re less than two weeks from Christmas, I figure that now would be the perfect time to discuss a subject that I’ve meaning to discuss for a while namely, the gradual attacks on Christmas (something which I think has really sped up this year). Don’t be surprised if the ridiculous “Happy holidays” nonsense comes here at some point in the future (if they do try and bring that here, I hope people will be as vocal as me about their contempt for it).

The first story I want to address comes from France. Recently, a council building in the city of Nantes was ordered by a court to remove a nativity scene as apparently having it there was a violation of their laws separating Church and State. This law has existed since 1905, but it’s only recently that it seems to be a problem. Although the article doesn’t spell where this problem is occurring, I think it’s pretty obvious that it probably offended some extremist Muslim types and their Social Justice Warrior, Marxist pets who of course have this ridiculous idea that Christmas traditions are oppressive in some way.

A quote from the article in question.

“In theory it doesn’t respect the law of neutrality of public buildings nor of the State, and it doesn’t respect the freedom of conscience of a citizen who sees a religious emblem imposed on them when going into Vendée’s departmental council,” he said.

Well the solution there is obvious. Act like a fucking adult and learn to ignore it instead of crying about the offensive imagery.

Baby Jesus: The most well known symbol of hatred in the world apart from the swastika. Oh and speaking of the swastika…

The next story that I want to address  goes back to the USA (where the ridiculous war on Christmas started). A Jewish woman took offence to wrapping paper which she claims has a swastika pattern. Because her stupid sensitivities were offended by it and because she’s such a special person, she arrogantly demanded that it was removed from sale nationwide…and unfortunately the cowardly fools running hallmark gave in to her demands.

It’s a well known fact that anybody who buys this wrapping paper is suddenly filled with an irresistible urge to go out and gas another 6 Million Jews. Thank God this brave woman saved so many lives with her whining.

The next story I want to deal with is regarding the decision by the the Dutch to abandon their traditional character Zwarte Piet (Black Pete in English) due to complaints that the character is racist. This is despite the fact that 92% of Dutch people are in favour of keeping the character and don’t consider it racist at all.

It’s like the bad old days of slavery all over again. -_-
Thank you Whitey for letting me into your country and giving me lots of free stuff. Now I demand you change all your beloved traditions to make me more comfortable.

Oh speaking of racism against black people, did you know the song “White Christmas” is apparently racist now? I sure didn’t, but according to this article here, apparently it is.

The only thing surreal to me is how fucking stupid you are to say this seriously.
The only thing surreal to me is how fucking stupid you are to say this seriously.

I always thought the “white” it referred to was snow, but I guess any inanimate object that’s white must be racist by virtue of the fact that it’s the same colour as the most racist and evil race of all.

Darius Rucker: The current face of evil racist white cops who go around murdering innocent black men for absolutely no reason.

I haven’t got anything else to say right now, but I’m sure the point is obvious. Because of the easily offended types out there, our harmless Christmas traditions are constantly under attack. The thing we need to remember is this. It’s called “taking offence” for a reason. It’s because you take offence rather than being given it. In other words, if you get offended by something, that’s your problem, not the problem of whoever offends you. Therefore you just need to get over yourself and let us get on with things as they are.

If we’re so horrible, so racist, and so oppressive, why do you choose to come to our lands?

No, no. Surely if we're so bad, you're running in the wrong direction.
No, no. Surely if we’re so bad, you’re running in the wrong direction.

I don’t understand why nobody ever asks this question. The minorities in predominately white countries who complain about racism have a simple solution to their problems. The fact is, apart from Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand, the majority of the planet is inhabited by non-whites. Therefore, if whites are really the evil, oppressive monsters that we’re made out to be, whose laws are unfair on everyone else, would it not make more sense to either stay in their home countries, or if they must leave, to go to a non-white country?

Still better than living in a country of white privilege, right?

Instead, the opposite happens. It seems as if all these people who complain about how bad we are, such as the black and Hispanic communities in America, or the Islamic extremists in Europe would rather live among the evil white folks than back with their own. This makes no sense to me. Surely the Islamic extremists would be happier in Shariah law nations, the Hispanic people would be happier in South/Central America, and the Black Americans would be happier in Africa with their own.

Sure, I’ll get much better accommodation if I live in Whitey’s country, but still, that would mean being around all those evil white people.

The only conclusion I can come to is that we aren’t really all that bad at all. Hence why whenever I here anyone claim that we are and should feel ashamed of ourselves, I just laugh it off because I know that these complainers are living a much better life here with us than they would back in their own homelands without us.

The benefits of multiculturalism. What benefits?

In the politically correct world we’re living in, we constantly hear about the alleged benefits of multiculturalism. One of my personal favourite terms that is used is “Diversity is a strength”. Has anyone noticed though that instead of ever specifying what these benefits are, they just keep repeating that they definitely exist and accuse anyone who disagrees with it of being a Nazi/ KKK Grand Wizard/ Skinhead etc? That’s because these so called benefits don’t actually exist so they aren’t able to spell them out . Instead, the Cultural Marxists who push for it (and who unfortunately wield a lot of power and influence in the Western World) resort to name calling, bullying, and destroying the livelihoods of anyone who dares to question their ridiculous lies.

What they want us to think happens in a multicultural world.
What they want us to think happens in a multicultural world.
What actually happens.
And this.
Which pisses off people like these.
A country like Sweden suddenly becomes the rape capitol of the world.
1400 young English girls are raped by Muslim men.
Different cultures fail to mix in artificial boundaries. As a result, civil wars occur with new boundaries set up to separate the different cultures. (Yugoslavia then and now)
Genocides occur.

Now just to reiterate what I’ve already said, there is nothing wrong with letting in reasonable numbers of outsiders, provided they make an effort to integrate. Anyone who is willing to assimilate themselves into the culture and traditions of the host society should be welcomed. Multiculturalism however by definition means more than one culture. This cannot work as history has shown time and time again (and is showing once again today in Europe).

The fact of the matter is, while we may have advanced a long way in terms of technology and culture, biologically speaking, we’re much the same as we were in the stone age. Back then, we were tribal societies and we evolved psychologically to prefer the company of our own tribe, over others, who were our competitors. Because we haven’t evolved since then biologically and psychologically, this tribal instinct is still encoded in our genes.

With multiple cultures living within the same boundaries, there will inevitably be competition for supremacy as each culture will prefer their own way of doing things and will want dominance. The only way to prevent this is to stop actual multiculturalism from occurring and instead, maintaining the supremacy of our own culture in our own boundaries. If people from outside want to join, I welcome them, but they must accept us for who we are. If they can’t do that, they shouldn’t be here. Plain and simple.

EU Court tells France they violated the rights of Somali Pirates. I LOL’d

There’s really not much to say here, but I think this needs to be checked out.

The European Court of Human Rights says France violated the rights of Somali pirates who had attacked French ships and has ordered compensation for them over judicial delays.

I would try to think of a witty retort to make fun of this but in all honesty, the sheer stupidity of it is so self-evident, that nothing I could possibly say would do it justice. I mean seriously, just read that sentence again and try to get your head around it.

Consider yourself “Culturally enriched” French Vessel.

The nine Somali pirates should get thousands of euros because they were not immediately brought before a French judge, the court ruled.

One is to get 9,000 euros (£7,000) and the others sums of up to 7,000 euros.

The judges faulted France for keeping them in custody for an extra 48 hours.

Now just put that in perspective. Lets just say an average worker was to work for 48 hours and get paid €7000. That would work out as €145.83 an hour. These vermin are actually getting paid that much by France literally for attacking a French ship with innocent French people.

What you racists don’t realise is that they contribute so much to French society by killing innocent French people and stealing from them. They’re worth every penny.

Before transferring the pirates to France, the authorities held one group for four days and the others for six days and 16 hours.

But the extra 48 hours of custody on French soil violated the pirates’ right to liberty and security under the European Convention on Human Rights, the court ruled.

Again, I really can’t think of a witty comment to make this look any dumber than it already looks. This is fucking ridiculous.

I think the solution here is obvious. Instead of arresting them and risking getting fined by the EU for doing so, they should just adopt a policy of not taking any of them alive. It would save so much hassle.