Sweden defends their title successfully against the Dutch upstarts.

So yesterday I was predicting the possibility that The Netherlands could potentially surpass Sweden as the most ridiculous country in Europe. Thankfully, the noble Swedes refused to go down without a fight, and have managed to successfully defend their crown today.

From The Local

A Swedish MEP is stepping up a pan-European cross-party campaign for “legal and safe routes to Europe” for migrants in the wake of the latest Mediterranean boat disaster. Cecilia Wikström, has told The Local that EU member states are currently doing so little to help guarantee safe passage that future generations will compare their actions to Sweden “turning a blind eye” to the Holocaust.

Because as everyone knows, it’s Europe’s fault that these economic migrants are paying criminal gangs to smuggle them illegally into Europe on boats that any idiot could tell are overcrowded and not seaworthy.

Here comes the cultural enrichment....if the boat doesn't sink that is.
Here comes the cultural enrichment….if the boat doesn’t sink that is.

The MEP – who is a long-time advocate of safer passage for refugees seeking safety in Europe – made headlines on Monday after she initially told Swedish television network SVT that future generations would liken the approach of EU governments to the policy of appeasement during the Second World War.

Safer passage for refugees is fine. I’m sure most reasonable people have no problem with taking in people who are genuinely in danger through no fault of their own (eg, being a persecuted minority). The problem however, is that a lot of these people are just economic migrants looking for a country to leech off. Others, genuinely are in danger in their home countries, but only because of crimes they committed back home. For example, there are numerous stories of rapists from Somalia who can’t be deported because they’re already on the run for rapes committed back home, and are likely to be killed if they went back. There is even a story of a Somalian man who was convicted of rape in Sweden, but they wouldn’t deport him because he may offend again back in Somalia, and it’s more important for Swedish law makers to protect Somalian citizens living in Somalia, than their own citizens. That’s how fucking stupid these Swedes are.

Sweden just wouldn't be Sweden without its wonderful Somali population.
Sweden just wouldn’t be Sweden without its wonderful Somali population.

Speaking to The Local after the broadcast, the centre-right Liberal Party politician said: “I stand by what I was saying at breakfast time. I think that my children and grandchildren are going to ask why more wasn’t done to help people running away from Isis, or violence in Eritrea or wherever, when we knew that people were dying in their thousands. People will ask the same question they did after the war, ‘if you were aware, why didn’t you do something?’. In Sweden we allowed our railroads to be used to transfer Jews to Nazi death camps.”

You know what would be a great way to help stop ISIS, Sweden? Clamp down on all the Muslim extremists that are thriving in your own country. Bashar al-Assad (someone who is on the frontlines actually dealing with ISIS) actually pointed out that some of the worst ISIS terrorists are coming from Scandinavia (mostly Sweden of course seeing as Denmark and Norway are somewhat more sane). But of course the idiotic Swedes would rather claim that they are trying to protect people from ISIS, by replacing their own population with “refugees” rather than actually doing anything to stop ISIS itself.

Swedish border checks in a nutshell.
Swedish border checks in a nutshell.

“There are more refugees in the world today than during and after the Second World War…The world is on fire at the moment and we need to cope with that,” she added.

I can neither confirm or deny this, as I don’t have the statistics.

“After the tragic events in Lampedusa in October 2013, heads of state stood by the coffins said it should never happen again. But there is a new Lampedusa every week and people are still willing to watch it happen.”

He shouldn’t have made that promise as it isn’t his responsibility to babysit those migrants. The responsibility is entirely on themselves and their native authorities.

Because national governments are responsible for most immigration policies, elected members of the European Parliament such as Wikström are limited to lobbying EU member states on the issue.

But the politician, who sits in the conservative European People’s Party grouping in Brussels and Strasbourg, says her campaign is attracting growing support across political bloc boundaries, with fellow MEPs such as Germany’s Birgit Sippel and France’s Sylvie Guillaume, who are both part of the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats. She hopes that her supporters can help influence national policies on the issue.

Unfortunately, lobbying will probably work. The EU doesn’t care about what the general population wants. Lobby groups do unfortunately tend to get their way at the expense of everyone else. Personally I’m against easing immigration restrictions, not because I’m heartless, but because I’m pragmatic. Africa has a population of a little over 1 Billion currently. Europe, is about 0.75 Billion (and I’m sure that’s probably counting the 3rd worlders that we’ve already taken in.) Africa is projected to have a population of 4 Billion by the end of the century. These people can’t even take care of themselves now, and their population is expected to quadruple. The vast majority of them would love to come to Europe for a better life, and the fact that these illegal boat trips keep happening, suggest that it’s never going to stop. We’ll be overrun if we keep letting them. We simply cannot take care of that many people and they clearly cannot take care of themselves either. All that’s going to happen is that Europe will turn into Africa if we keep this up. Instead of just letting them in ad infinitum, why not try to look more closely as to why they are leaving, and deal with the issues at the source. At this point, I think an actual plan is necessary, before things go to far.

“I’m not good at judging the size of crowds, but I’d say there’s about 17 Million of them out there.”~ Father Dougal Maguire.
Actually Father, I think you’ve underestimated by a factor of 10.
When asked about how Sweden’s Social Democrat-Green coalition government had responded to her campaign, she told The Local: “It is very controversial. I cannot speak for the government or disclose what they have said. What I can say is I really wish for them to take the lead on this and put it [legal safe passage to Europe] into action as a national policy”.
The Local has contacted the offices of Prime Minister Stefan Löfven and Foreign Minister Margot Wallström for comment.

Legal passage exists for…LEGAL IMMIGRANTS!!!

These people aren’t legal for a reason. Of course, that won’t matter. If history is anything to go by, Sweden will cave in on this issue, just like everything else.

Over the weekend Italy’s Prime Minister Matteo Renzi criticized other EU nations for not doing enough to help his country cope with the surge of migrants trying to reach his country’s shores and argued that international efforts needed to focus on returning stability to Libya, rather than on sea patrols and search-and-rescue resources.
At least there is one voice of reason among those with actual power in Europe. He is of course 100% correct in his assessment. Funny he mentions Libya. Before he went down, Gaddafi warned us that this would happen
Impossible!!! Geographical location is the sole cause of a person's behaviour. Those Muslims will clearly become good Europeans, just like how the Europeans who colonised America all adopted the lifestyle of the Native Americans.
Impossible!!! Geographical location is the sole cause of a person’s behaviour. Those Muslims will clearly become good Europeans, just like how the Europeans who colonised America all adopted the lifestyle of the Native Americans.
Meanwhile Spain’s Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy said Europe risked “damaging our credibility if we are not able to prevent these tragic situations which are happening every day.”
Aid and refugee organisations have also been quick to demand more cross-border cooperation on the issue.
“This disaster confirms how urgent it is to restore a robust rescue-at-sea operation and establish credible legal avenues to reach Europe. Otherwise people seeking safety will continue to perish at sea,” said António Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees.
Yeah…I don’t think the majority of Europeans care about that kind of credibility. In fact, I’m sure most of us would rather that people back in these countries realised how dangerous a journey it is. That way, only those who actually truly need to escape a life threatening situation would be willing to take the risk, while those just looking to freeload off Europe might think twice.
“But it also points to the need for a comprehensive European approach to address the root causes that drive so many people to this tragic end. I hope the EU will rise to the occasion, fully assuming a decisive role to prevent future such tragedies.
Yes, I made this point already. Find out why they’re leaving their countries and work to fix the issues there. If the reason is simply “I want to come to Europe to live on welfare while raping white women” then quite frankly, they don’t deserve our help. In fact, I’d advocate torpedoing their boats in that case.
“Aw sheeiit, ah wuz gonna use muh dik on those white beetches.”
EU foreign and interior ministers began emergency talks in Luxembourg at 1pm GMT, with EU Home Affairs Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos also attending as the 28 member states try to find a solution to the growing tide of humanity washing up on its southern shores.
But European politians are deeply divided over how to tackle the issue, with many countries reluctant to change current rules, keen to retain their autonomy on immigration policies and concerned about the potential costs of helping refugees to reach safety in Europe.
The UK for example is unlikely to back any controversial policy shifts in the run up to its general election in three weeks. In Finland, which held elections over the weekend, discussions are underway which could see a nationalist populist party forming part of the country’s next coalition government.
Oh, but we can be sure that once elections have passed, there will be decisions made that don’t benefit the electorate one bit.
As well as Monday’s meeting, EU president Donald Tusk has said he is considering holding a special leader’s summit on the crisis but no date has been fixed.
The latest disaster in Italy comes after a week in which two other migrant shipwrecks left an estimated 450 people dead.
And yet nobody is expecting the governments of the countries they left to take any responsibility. It’s always our fault.
Some 11,000 migrants have been rescued since the middle of last week and current trends suggest last year’s total of 170,000 landing in Italy is likely to be exceeded in 2015.
Many travel onwards to other countries including Sweden, which takes in more asylum seekers per capita than any other EU nation.
So 170,000 landed in Italy last year. It’s going to be exceeded this year. No doubt, it’s going to continue year after year after year, and people don’t think that this might eventually cause major problems in Europe?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s