Equality: Driving down standards to that of the weakest.

In our current joke societies, we’re told that everybody is equal. The problem however is that a lot of people misunderstand what equality actually means in this context. Equality just means that we’re entitled to the same rights, protections, and opportunities as anyone else. Idiots however think it means that we all are exactly the same in every way and there therefore should be equality of outcome whenever multiple people attempt to do the same thing. Any time somebody fails at something, it’s only because someone else is oppressing them in some way, and not because of their own inability.

In the United States, several women have expressed interest in becoming army Rangers. The Rangers are the most elite of all soldiers and in order to become one, a candidate has to pass some very grueling physical and mental tests. Very few people are able to meet the standards necessary to become a Ranger, but those who do are considered “the best of the best”. So far, not one woman has been able to meet the standards necessary to become a Ranger. Rather than accepting the obvious reality, that we’re a sexually dimorphic species with different strengths and weaknesses, with men having natural biological advantages over women to meet the necessary criteria to become Rangers,  feminists have instead decided to complain that the tests are sexist and that standards should be lowered to allow more women to pass.

From Yahoo News

On Friday, the Army is expected to announce that all the women who had attempted to graduate from Ranger School had officially failed to meet the standards, according to a military source.

Ranger School, which grooms the Army’s most elite special operations fighting force, opened its doors to women for the first time this year. Eight of the 20 women who originally entered the school’s first co-ed class were allowed to recycle through the program after they fell out in their first go-round. The Friday announcement will confirm that this happened again.

To many, this means the system is working as it should.

The Rangers are the best of the best, and being a Ranger means passing a physical test that pushes body and mind to the breaking point. If women can’t do it, the argument goes, then they shouldn’t be Rangers.

This of course makes perfect sense. If they physically can’t do it, they can’t do it. As far as I’m concerned, it’s no different than if a man who is out of shape can’t do it either. If they can’t meet the standards necessary, then they shouldn’t do it.

I'm sure she could probably meet the standards.
I’m sure she could probably meet the standards.

But there is another opinion quietly being voiced as well: that Ranger School is more akin to a rite of passage – an opportunity for men to “thump their chest,” as one Ranger puts it – than a realistic preparation for leading in war. That women can actually make Ranger units more effective. And that the standards that keep them out are outdated.

How is it outdated?

How can women make units more effective exactly? What is it about women specifically that could make them more effective to the Rangers than men? If we’re all supposed to be equal, then surely there’s no difference between us, and it doesn’t matter whether the new Rangers are men or women. All new Rangers will be equally able to make the Rangers more effective. Or is this just another case of doublethink where you hold the contradictory views that we’re all exactly the same, yet there are differences between us which necessitates the need for female Rangers?

Please explain your arguments rather than just making these bullshit feel good comments.

It is an opinion, perhaps surprisingly, that comes from two current Rangers.

This is the sort of suggestion that has long been guaranteed to create a robust outcry in many soldierly quarters – one that involves, put most politely, the charge that this would amount to lowering standards in order to meet some goal born of political correctness.

And I agree with that line of thought

It isn’t a way of thinking likely to gain great traction anytime soon. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the Army’s top officer, made this clear during a breakfast with reporters Thursday. While praising the performance of the women at the Ranger School, he added: “I’m actually fairly adamant about not changing the physical standards.”

Now just watch as this guy is attacked by a bunch of demented harpies for being a misogynist.

But a discussion is percolating.

Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus told the Navy Times this week that once women start attending SEAL training, it would make sense to examine the standards. “First, we’re going to make sure there are standards. Second, that they are gender-neutral, and third, that they have something to do with the job,” he said.

  1. There are indeed standards.
  2. They are gender neutral already. They are simply the mental and physical standards necessary to become a ranger and perform the duties that position entails. If you don’t have the physical strength necessary to carry a 200 pound wounded comrade to safety from the battlefield, you wouldn’t be an effective ranger. That has nothing to do with being a man or a woman. It’s just how things are.
  3. See above. It has everything to do with the job.

It is increasingly men who are doing the talking about standards because, they say, they’ve trained in the schools, served in the field, and they believe it’s the right thing to do.

“Of course women don’t want to change the standard – they don’t want to be accused of lowering it,” says Col. Jason Amerine, a Ranger and West Point graduate. “And men don’t want to change it either, because it lets us thump our chest.”

As a result, “women will always fight to meet the male standard, even if it’s arbitrary and kind of stupid,” he adds. “I’m often pretty horrified at the adversity they face, while they keep their mouths shut and deal with it.”

So if women are willing to try and meet the standards as they are, then what’s the fucking problem? Who is complaining exactly?

And how exactly is it arbitrary and stupid? You’re not actually explaining why the current standards as they exist are flawed. You’re just making a baseless statement and expecting people to believe it.

Other agree that the time has come for a conversation.

“I think it’ll be contentious, but I think it’s equitable and sensible to ask the question about what are the [Ranger School] standards that are only related to the fact that only men have ever done it,” says retired Lt. Gen. David Barno, who served as the top commander of United States forces in Afghanistan, as well as three tours in Army Ranger battalions.

What’s more, “it needs to be a Ranger qualified leader,” he adds, one with “intestinal fortitude” to ask: “What’s the ‘secret sauce’ of Ranger School? How do you not dilute that, but make sure the standards make sense?”

I’m sure leadership is an important part of it, and I’m not saying women can’t be leaders, but it’s not the only part of it that matters. Being able to survive in enemy territory, being able to overpower enemy combatants, being able to carry wounded comrades to safety etc. are all potential scenarios that Rangers may need to engage in. Therefore they should be capable of doing all these things.

If you can do this, great. If not, what use are you to your wounded comrade?
If you can do this, great. If not, what use are you to your wounded comrade?

This argument is less about gender equity than the firm belief that women can make Ranger battalions better. In modern warfare, relations with local populations are crucial, and women Rangers would provide unique value added in places such as Afghanistan or Iraq, where cultural norms often prohibit contact between male soldiers and women. Ranger School also showed women were innovative problem-solvers who offered fresh approaches in the field.

First of all, thanks for actually admitting the obvious truth…that there are differences between men and women (though of course being the spineless coward that you are, you only focus on the areas that women are superior in while continuing to ignore the areas that men are superior in). Second of all, if it’s really that important to have women to perform certain roles, then why not create another position for women then that utilises these talents then? Instead of making them Rangers, and sending them on Ranger missions, make them something else, and send them to perform duties that they are more suited for. How fucking hard is this to figure out?

On the battlefield itself, they have proven themselves. While at war, Colonel Amerine says, “I was rarely with female soldiers who couldn’t hang.”

The average soldier is not the same as a Ranger. I’m sure they could perform just fine as soldiers. It doesn’t mean they’re suitable to be Rangers, anymore than the average male soldier who performs his duties just fine.

To him, this raises the question of what Ranger School is actually about. As new technologies potentially make raw physical strength less important, the real challenge, many say, becomes bringing women’s leadership skills into the upper echelons of the armed forces.

Please explain what makes women’s leadership skills specifically so good that you need them instead of men? Are they somehow automatically superior in leadership roles than men? Can you provide evidence to support this?

Also, what are these new technologies that make physical strength less relevant? Are you suggesting that there is absolutely no possibility in the future than Rangers will not be in a situation which necessitates superior physical strength? Because unless you can 100% guarantee that greater physical strength will never again be necessary, why take the chance? Are the feelings of these women more important than their lives, or the lives of their comrades?

*Sniff* *sniff*
*Sniff* *sniff* “Oh sweety it’s horrible. Mommie got kicked out of the Rangers, just because another soldier got killed. It’s not my fault that I didn’t have the strength to carry him to safety when he was wounded. This really hurts my feelings”

For Col. Jason Dempsey, a fellow Ranger and West Point graduate, this points to a need for “reassessing what war-fighting is, and what’s really important,” he says, rather than “having 100,000 guys who are essentially pack mules.”

Ranger School could be made better, says Amerine, who was awarded a Bronze Star with “Valor” for Special Forces action in Afghanistan in the opening days of the war, and is currently under whistleblower investigation by the Army for criticizing US hostage rescue policy (Amerine has served on special forces hostage rescue missions).

“Nobody is saying, ‘Are the standards kind of stupid?’ ” he adds. “What’s interesting is that no one had this much love for the standards when it was only men.” 

I’m sure they didn’t, but that’s human nature because nobody likes having to endure rigorous testing. I don’t like having to do assignments or exams in college but whether I like it or not, I have to be able to do them well in order to show my competency to perform tasks for an employer. It just has to be done.

As it stands today, Ranger School involves, say, “carrying 60 or 70 pounds on your back and walking for 12 miles – it’s not brain surgery,” Colonel Dempsey says.

But it is potentially something that will have to be done when on a mission. Hence, it’s necessary to be able to do it.

Despite this, “Any effort to change that is ‘changing the standard.’ ”

The question, he adds, is: Are these standards a fair measure of the challenges of combat?


Dempsey recalls being in violent Kunar province in Afghanistan and hiking up to the rugged Pakistan border. Along for the mission was a male first sergeant who was also a Ranger-tabbed Golden Gloves boxer. The unit had to stop for the first sergeant because he needed to rest during the strenuous march. 

“No one’s going to say that the first sergeant is a deadbeat. We need him, and we’re just going to take a break.”

On other occasions, he adds, the combat patrols would simply make the decision not to bring along their heavy packs.

“The equipment we carry is just insane,” Amerine says. “We all have back injuries at the end of our careers.”

The No. 1 Department of Veterans Affairs claim – made by 58 percent of all claimants – is muscular-skeletal injuries. 

“If we really are serious about integrating the force, the equipment we carry is going to be one of the things we have to have a hard conversation about,” Amerine says. “It’s in our grasp technologically to make things a lot lighter.” 

So maybe when you change the equipment, you can change the standards. Right now, you’re putting the cart before the horse. As long as that equipment is carried, you need to be able to carry it. When the weight of the equipment is lowered, you can lower the standard to reflect the new weight. Why is this so hard to figure out?

Take away brute strength as one of the pillars of Ranger School, and its purpose begins to preparing Army soldiers to be excellent leaders, which has long been the promise of Ranger School, he adds. 

Could they not just train to be leaders by earning a commission and steadily rising through the officer ranks? Isn’t that the whole point of becoming an officer? Officers are the leaders.

In that context, the Ranger pass-fail rates look different. After West Point invested four years building the men in Amerine’s class into leaders, “All of us were expected to go to Ranger School, and all of us were expected to pass,” he says. 

But that’s not true of women, “and I have a problem with that,” he adds. “I think there’s something fundamentally wrong with that structure.”

What he remembers from the six months it took to get his Ranger tab was that “my feet didn’t feel the same for literally two years,… but I can’t honestly say I learned much.”

“If Ranger School is actually about teaching soldiers how to lead and how to fight, then maybe the rite-of-passage aspect of it needs to be lightened,” he says. It might make more sense to figure out “what is the standard for serving in combat, then deal with the rite of passage.” 

I’m sure the standard for serving in combat is actually being able to engage in combat. That could very easily include hand to hand combat. Therefore, an ability to hold your own in hand to hand combat and defeat your opponent is necessary. Having the physical strength necessary to overpower your opponent would obviously help in this situation.

For now, there’s no indication that the Army is even considering such a move. But neither is it considering closing off women from trying for their Ranger tab.

“We’ll probably run a couple more pilots,” General Odierno said. “I don’t think we’re going to give up on it.”

Please just give up on it. It’s a stupid idea.

This is what political correctness has led to. They want to believe that we’re all equal but the problem is that some people are naturally better at some things than others. It’s physically impossible to raise the inferior to the level of the superior so the only way that equality can be reached, is to lower the superior to the level of the inferior. And this is exactly what they’re doing because reaching equality and making sure nobody has their feelings hurt is more important than anything else, no matter what.

“They told me I wasn’t allowed into medical school because I was too stupid to meet the requirements. Luckily for me, they lowered the standards to my level. I’ve killed more patients than I’ve saved (including one guy who just came in for an eyesight test) but at least my feelings aren’t hurt anymore”
“They told me I was too obese to be a lingerie model. Luckily they’ve since lowered the standards to my level. I demand that all men find me sexually attractive so my feelings aren’t hurt”
“They told me I wasn’t allowed to adopt a child because of my history of molesting children. Luckily, they lowered the standards for adoption, and I’ve now adopted seven kids. My feelings are no longer hurt”
“They told me that I was was too stupid to be allowed to teach others. Luckily they lowered the standards to my level and now I can teach. Not one of my students has been able to graduate from highshool, but at least my feelings aren’t hurt anymore”
“They told me I couldn’t have a driver’s licence because I’m blind. Luckily they lowered the standards to my level. I’ve killed a couple of hundred pedestrians already, but at least my feelings aren’t hurt anymore”
“They told us we couldn’t win the Nobel Peace Prize because we’re terrorists. Luckily they lowered the standards to our level. Our feelings are no longer hurt. Allahu Akbar”

This really is incredibly stupid.


World White Web

Apparently search engines are racist now. I personally didn’t notice because I’m too busy basking in my white privilege to care about such things. Fortunately, someone else noticed this problem and has taken it upon herself to do something. Her ridiculous idea is to bring “diversity” to the net and get rid of whiteness.

Have you ever seen something so evil?
Have you ever seen something so evil?

When you search on Google for the term “hand” or “leg,” the results you get back rarely feature a person of color.

My goodness, can you even begin to imagine the hurt feelings?

This man was so upset when he couldn't find an image of a black hand, that he cried for six straight hours. He probably would have kept on crying if a white cop hadn't shown up and shot him in the back for absolutely no reason.
This man was so upset when he couldn’t find an image of a black hand, that he cried for six straight hours. He probably would have kept on crying if a white cop hadn’t shown up and shot him in the back for absolutely no reason.

It was this particular search result that led Swedish design student Johanna Burai to launch the World White Web campaign.


Why am I not surprised?

I was looking for an image of a black hand, and I expected to find one simply by searching for ‘hand’.

A Google image search for the term “hand” gives you about 800 hits, but they are all white. You need to perform a more detailed search if you want to find non-white hands.

Did it ever occur to you that maybe images of white hands show up because the word “hand” is an English word and the majority population in countries that speak English as a first language, are white? I’m sure if you typed in the Ethiopian word for hand into an Ethiopian version of Google (assuming such a thing exists), you would get black hands by default.

Or maybe, God forbid, seeing as the internet was invented by white men primarily in the mainly white United States, that maybe searches are representative of the people behind it? I’m sure if the internet was invented in a black country by black engineers, I’m sure the searches would show more black hands.

What a ridiculous complaint.

These two white men, Bob Kahn and Vint Cerf didn't really invent the internet. They stole the idea from some unnamed black guy and got all the credit unfairly. If you disagree with this statement, you're racist.
These two white men, Bob Kahn and Vint Cerf didn’t really invent the internet. They stole the idea from some unnamed black guy and got all the credit unfairly. If you disagree with this statement, you’re racist.

The World White Web project aims to raise promote equality in search results and raise awareness of  ‘whiteness’ on the Web and any campaigns to stop it.

Yes, we must put a stop to whiteness on the internet. Even though race apparently doesn’t actually exist according to so called progressives, and we’re all supposedly exactly the same, we still need to go to great lengths to get rid of whiteness. It’s for the greater good of humanity.

The site features six images of non-white hands that you are encouraged to download and share on sites like Twitter, Facebook and Pinterest in order to boost their rankings on Google.

This is so fucking stupid.

It also includes links to informative pieces on related topics like white privilege and institutional racism.

And it just gets worse. Despite the fact that Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States were all built by white people, and despite the fact that these countries are the only ones in the world that allow outsiders from failed countries to come in and have a better life than they the one they left, we still need to hear about how horrible we are. I’ve never once heard someone explain how white privilege or institutional racism actually works. It’s just another one of those situations were if they say it over and over again, it’s eventually assumed to be true.

Keep saying it. Eventually, people will believe it no matter how little substance it has.
Keep saying it. Eventually, people will believe it no matter how little substance it has.
Tell the whites in South Africa or Zimbabwe about how privileged they are. White majorities treat their non-white minorities much better than a non-white majority treats its white minorities. This is fact.
Tell the whites in South Africa or Zimbabwe about how privileged they are. White majorities treat their non-white minorities much better than a non-white majority treats its white minorities. This is fact.

Burai told TNW that it’s about representation:

I think representation is very important for all of us. To be represented in a positive or neutral way in all kinds of media, such as television, magazines, commercials, films etc. That’s why I want to make the Google Image Search a little more diverse.

Yes, and I’m sure if you left Sweden and went to Africa or the Middle East, they’d all be doing the same thing for you. I’m sure they’d care very much about making you feel represented.

Less than a week old, the final year student’s project is gaining traction online with over 2,000 shares of the images on Facebook already. It will be interesting to see the impact of such a simplistic approach to a complex problem.

Another 2000 idiots.

On the topic, let me just do a random search of a certain word an see what comes up.

I just don't understand. I wanted to get an image of a Swedish person, but for some reason, Google images only shows the vegetable when I search for
I just don’t understand. I wanted to get an image of a Swedish person, but for some reason, Google images only shows the vegetable when I search for “Swede”. This is outrageous. I need to start a campaign that makes Swedish people more represented in Google searches.

The sad reality…some people will be impossible to reach.

One thing I’ve always tried to steer clear of doing is talking up my own intelligence. I don’t believe that I’m any more or any less intelligent than the average person in my age group. However there are two things that I will say in my favour. One, I have a curious nature, and two, I’m always willing to give the other side a chance to have their say, rather than sticking to my beliefs, and dismissing their beliefs automatically. If I have a belief, but someone else comes along with the opposite belief, I’m willing to hear them out. If they provide arguments that can be backed up by objective, observable reality which counter my beliefs, I’m willing to reassess my own beliefs. Let me just make that quite clear again, I’m willing to reassess my own beliefs if the other side provides objective facts. Hysterical emotional rhetoric is irrelevant.

“Fuck off you muppet”~Me

I also won’t necessarily say that everything that I say is 100% guaranteed to be correct. I’m only human, and I’m capable of making mistakes just like anyone else. The conclusions I’ve come to are simply my assessment of events after looking at both sides of the story, figuring out what the facts are as best as I can, and giving my opinions in line with the observable truth as I interpret it.

I have emotional biases as much as anyone else and these emotional biases influence the topics that I cover. This is why I don’t cover stories that involve genuine cases of racism (against minorities), homophobia, sexism etc. It’s not that I don’t care about these issues. As a decent human being (or at least I’d like to think I am) of course I care about all genuine cases of injustice. It’s just that these issues are covered so much already in the mainstream, that I really have nothing new to add to those discussions. However, unfair discrimination against white people, fake cases of racism against minorities, the ridiculous situation in Sweden, or the current agenda of putting the demands of trans people over the will of the majority don’t get much attention, or if they do, there is a heavy bias in favour of the side that makes no sense to me. Hence, these are the topics that I choose to discuss in the hopes of bringing more attention to them, and getting people to think more abstractly outside of the mainstream narrative.

A sad story, and probably has a lot more credibility than most of these ridiculous
A sad story, and probably has a lot more credibility than most of these ridiculous “black guy killed by cops” stories. I don’t discuss it because the mainstream has already covered that line of thinking.

Unfortunately, the more I look at the world, the more alone I feel by having this way of thinking. Even looking at my Facebook timeline, it is hotbed of politically correct circle-jerking, with a hivemind of acceptable points of view. Certain stories go viral, and everyone expresses the exact same opinion on them. Anyone who goes against the hivemind will find themselves being attacked by a bunch of lunatics who based on the rage they express, I can actually imagine them with their eyes bulging, red faced, foaming at the mouth, in front of their computer screens.


I essentially feel as if I live in a world where to a lot of people, the actual facts don’t matter. The stories might be heavily biased in favour of one point of view, but that doesn’t matter to them because it fits their preconceived politically correct ideology. For example, all those blacks being killed by white cops in America. The stories tell us that they’re innocent people who were murdered in cold blood by racist cops. Seeing these stories, a circle-jerk of “oh those poor innocent victims of evil racist white people” like comments springs up. More and more people get involved in the “discussion” making the same comments, and they all start liking each others comments. Someone who looks into the actual facts behind the stories (statistics on crime or deaths by race, autopsy reports for the victims etc.) might come along and bring this new information to the discussion. Instead of looking at the newly provided information, and reassessing the story, people will often just dismiss it and become more stubborn in their beliefs. This is because these people don’t care about facts. They only care about feelings, or with agreeing with whatever the majority, or the authority figure is saying (the mainstream media is perceived like an authority figure).

This is really how the left has evolved over time. Back in the day, they stood up against injustice and bravely challenged things. Now, they refuse challenges against their own ideologies because they are incapable of using logic to defend themselves.
This is really how the left has evolved over time. Back in the day, they stood up against injustice and bravely challenged things. Now, they refuse challenges against their own ideologies because they are incapable of using logic to defend themselves.

When I look at how these people will deny observable facts to suit their preconceived beliefs, it fills me with despair because I worry about how far they’ll take it. Just today, I saw someone on my friends list basically speak out in favour of thought crime legislation because (s)he doesn’t like the no side of the marriage campaign expressing their views. Now as I’ve made quite clear, I was a yes voter myself, but the idea of censoring the no side for their views seems completely ridiculous to me, because of the Pandora’s box it opens up. It’s all well and good to say that you want to punish speech that you find distasteful, but who exactly is given the power to decide what speech is allowed, and how do you know that they’ll only stop at the speech you disagree with? What’s to stop them from finding views that you’re in favour of, deciding that they personally find them distasteful, and punishing you the same way you would punish people on the no side?

“So why did the thought police arrest you?”
“I called the Taoiseach a prick”

Yet I know that if I was to point this out to this person, not only would they not see things that way, they’d more than likely snap and act as if I haven’t got a clue what I’m talking about. I know this because of how smug the person was about how much more intelligent and enlightened they were than the no voters. I don’t disagree that the yes side has the correct point of view, but when you have the correct point of view, surely you’re capable of defending it through logic, reason, and well founded arguments, rather than through tyranny and oppression against the other side, right?

First they came for the no voters and I did not speak out because I wasn't a no voter. Then they came for the racists and I did not speak out because I wasn't a racist. Then they came for the pro-lifers and I did not speak out because I wasn't a pro-lifer. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.
First they came for the no voters and I did not speak out because I wasn’t a no voter. Then they came for the racists and I did not speak out because I wasn’t a racist. Then they came for the pro-lifers and I did not speak out because I wasn’t a pro-lifer. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me.

No matter how much I disagree with the no voters, or other groups whose views differ from my own,  I will defend their right to express their views. Censoring them is the act of a coward, or someone who simply is incapable of defending their point of view. Oh and just to make things clear, I’m not saying they shouldn’t experience any consequences for expressing their beliefs. If you think they’re a fucking idiot or a nasty person for saying things like this, then by all means, tell them exactly what you think of them. Just as I feel they should have the right to express their views, no matter how controversial, you in turn should have the same rights to express your opinions on them. I’m simply saying that using legal punishments (fines, imprisonment etc.) should not be an option unless they actually discriminate against others in some way (for example, refusing to serve them at work).

It’s just a shame to know that some people will never be reached. They’d rather live in an Orwellian nightmare than be exposed to dissenting views. I worry that people like this are becoming the majority. I really hope that enough others can be reached to offset the damage they could do.

“Europe could be overrun with white South Africans”

Every day we hear about Arabs and black Africans fleeing to Europe to escape “persecution” of some kind. We’re told that we need to help these poor unfortunates and about how they strengthen Europe by bringing diversity. We need them here because without them, Europe will not survive. The fact that it survived just fine so far without them is irrelevant. We need them so that they can raise Europe to the same levels of prosperity as the countries they left.

Typical African city
Typical African city
Typical Middle Eastern city
Typical Middle Eastern city
Typical European city
Typical European city

If we see an increase in terrorism, rapes, murders etc. as a result of these people coming in, it is irrelevant. Racists like to pretend that they care about these issues but really, they’re just pretending to care and are just using them as excuses when their real motivation is that they hate the colour of their skin.

"Oh this is great. I'm glad these Muslim men raped all those children. It gives me a perfect excuse to complain about them when I really just hate them because they have a different skin colour to me"~ Racists
“Oh this is great. I’m glad these Muslim men raped all those children. It gives me a perfect excuse to complain about them when I really just hate them because they have a different skin colour to me”~ Racists

No, clearly these people are much more of a benefit than a threat to Europe. There is however a much more real threat to Europe that needs to be addressed. Something so dangerous and so terrifying, that we must never let them into Europe. I am of course talking about…

Yeah. These people.
Yeah. These people.

Recently a petition has been doing the rounds to try and get the EU to allow them the right to return to the countries that their ancestors left. Although not many people ever hear about it, since the end of Apartheid in South Africa,the pendulum has really swung in the other direction. Just google “white genocide South Africa” to read all about it for yourself.

Of course we all know that if you’re white, fleeing genocide is not a valid excuse to seek asylum in safe countries. It is however if you’re non-white. Another valid excuse for seeking asylum if you’re non-white is being incapable of taking care of yourself and needing to parasite off others and rape their women, hence why we take those migrants from “Libya” seriously. The Express rightly called this threat for what it was with their initial headline. For some reason, they changed the headline soon afterwards. I’m guessing that racist white people intimidated them somehow.

The initial headline.
The initial headline.
The current headline.
The current headline.

From The Express

The online call to action demands the European Commission (EC) allows all white South Africans to obtain automatic European citizenship.

The petition has already gained more than 1,000 supporters in just half a day.

Rodrigo de Campos, who started the campaign, is gaining support for his belief that the “white South African population currently faces ethnic cleansing and persecutions” at the hands of the ruling ANC government, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party and “various individual anti-white aggressors”.

And he is correct in his assessment.

He also says: “Over 4000 white farmers have been brutally murdered, often including torture and rape and mutilation.”

An increasing number of supporters believe the solution to this is for white South Africans – and white Zimbabweans and Namibians – to be allowed to “return” to whatever nation the majority of their ancestors are from – which in most cases is the Netherlands or the UK.

Makes perfect sense. Plus it also means that those black Africans will no longer have any “privileged whites to oppress them”…well that is until they inevitably get on the boats to white countries themselves.

The petition compares white South Africans to Jews being allowed citizenship in Israel.

It says: “Based on the Israeli government’s policy of allowing all Jews the right to return to Israel, we believe it is not only advisable but morally obligatory that Europe should allow all white South Africans the right to return.”

An interesting comparison. Keep in mind as well that the Jews were away from those lands for about 2000 years, whereas with South Africans, they’ve only been away from their ancestral lands for about 2 or 300. If the world allows the Jews to return to Israel after that much time, then why not allow the white South Africans to return to Europe when they’ve been gone for significantly less time? I’d love to see how they’d try and justify that double standard.

Currently South Africans, of any colour, applying for British Citizenship have to tick all the boxes people from any other country outside the EU have to.

This includes having lived in the UK for at least five years before applying – usually on a work visa

Susan Mulder, who signed the petition from Cape Town, said: “My life and the lives of my children are at risk daily.

“We love SA but are no longer welcome here in the country our ancestors built.

“We have no option but to ask for your help.”

Another supporter of the petition is Marischka Davies, living in Liverpool. She said: “I am a naturalised British citizen yet my mom is stuck on her own in South Africa. 

“She should be growing old with her daughter and granddaughter.

“She has been attacked with an AK47 held to her head and is alone and traumatised. She deserves to be free from living in fear.”

No she doesn’t. She’s white, so she deserves nothing less than to live in constant fear for her life. That’s what she gets for oppressing people simply by being white.

While Matty de Bruyn, in Cape Town, simply said: “There is no hope for the white man in South Africa.”

There are just over half a million South Africans living in Britain.

According to census date, more than 800,000 white South Africans moved overseas – mainly to Britain, Australia and New Zealand – between 1991 and 2001.

And do you notice how you never hear any cases of white South Africans causing problems in the countries that they move to? It makes me suspicious. I bet they’re the ones causing all the problems, but the biased pro-white media covers it all up and pretends that others do it.

Oh and btw, the petition they speak about can be signed here.

It’s only “diversity” when they invade us. When the reverse happens, it’s “gentrification”

As London becomes a more and more “diverse” city, it becomes more and more expensive for anyone to actually live there. Therefore, ordinary working class Brits are being forced to move from the centre of the city to the outskirts, to poorer neighbourhoods which are currently occupied by foreign nationals.

From BBC

In a third floor flat of a 1930s ex-council block, Saleh Ahmed looks up from the kitchen table where his wife Rusnobun is preparing a late afternoon meal of spiced tuna kebabs.

He takes a few for himself and carries the rest still steaming down the corridor for their son Kabir, who owns the flat next door. Along the way he dodges his two grandchildren chasing each other around the balcony.

This is Carter House on Holland Estate, in the heart of Spitalfields’ Bangladeshi community. It is also prime development land.

To the east is the Gherkin, to the left is Petticoat Lane Market and around the corner is Brick Lane, with its famous curry houses.

Social landlord EastendHomes has drawn up plans to demolish the ex-council estate, replacing it with modern flats, most of which it plans to sell for profit on the private market.

It says the proceeds would fund refurbishment of its other social housing stock and help it to provide affordable housing for local people.

However, there is a human price to pay.

Most of the 600 residents, tenants and leaseholders fear they will have little choice but to leave. They say it will be too expensive to either buy or rent homes in this now desirable area and their decades-old community faces fragmentation.

At a meeting on 8 April residents say they were told by an EastendHomes officer their flats were “unfit for human habitation”.

I don’t doubt it for a second. It’s just undisputed reality that an area is a reflection of the people who live there. That’s why countries like America, Canada, New Zealand and Australia are every bit as advanced as Europe, because they’re run by people of European descent.

Rhodesia in Africa was once run by its white minority and it was the most prosperous country on the continent (with the possible exception of South Africa which was also run by a white minority). As soon as the black majority took power in Rhodesia and it became Zimbabwe, it quickly declined to the level of any other poor African country.

When Haiti was a French colony, it was like a European society. After the slave revolution, an independent state was set up and ever since, Haiti has been a poverty ridden cesspool.

Detroit in America was once one of the most industrialised cities in the world. In the past few decades, the once majority white population has been replaced by a majority black population and the city has declined so much that it may as well be an African city (and it probably would be if it wasn’t getting propped up by American taxes).

Therefore when looking at other examples of first world societies declining because they become inhabited by third world people, I think it’s not beyond reason to suggest the possibility that a first world neighbourhood full of people from Bangladesh could become like a neighbourhood back in Bangladesh.

The first image that comes up when googling "Bangladesh town"
The first image that comes up when googling “Bangladesh town”

I don’t say this to be offensive. I’m just saying what’s the alternative theory? That it’s all just a coincidence that societies founded by European people all become highly developed and just decline purely by random chance when the European people are replaced by non-Europeans? Because quite frankly, that all seems a little too coincidental to be believed.

Kabir Ahmed, a 40-year-old secondary school teacher, says, “EastendHomes will say anything to justify knocking down our homes for profit.”

Carter House comprises about 60% privately-owned units and 40% social housing. What most of the leaseholders and social housing tenants have in common is the desire to stay in their homes, but an initial demolition notice was served in March 2014.

EastendHomes said it had not officially declared the flats unfit for human habitation and the estate had been repaired a few years ago to meet the government’s Decent Homes Standard.

It has already knocked down some smaller blocks on the estate at Denning Point and replaced them with new-build flats called Kensington and Sloane Apartments. A two-bed flat is being offered for nearly £3,000 a month rent, while a one-bed flat is for sale for £600,000.

That compares to the £546 per month Mr Ahmed’s father pays for his two-bed flat through the social housing scheme and a maximum of £350,000 residents calculate they would be offered by EastendHomes in the event of a compulsory purchase order, based on figures the charity has shown them.

Walking tours visit the estate at least three or four times a day and tourists snap hundreds of photos of the homes where the “real Eastenders live”. But for how long will this corner of the East End remain authentic?

People from Bangladesh are the “real Eastenders” apparently. Not the native white British people whose ancestors actually built the country.

Sorry Phil, but you're too white to be believable as an Eastender.
Sorry Phil, but you’re too white to be believable as an Eastender.

It is a situation familiar across many inner-city areas of London.

In Brixton, campaigners were sprayed with CS gas during an anti-gentrification protest in April. Peckham Vision, a group representing businesses, churches and other community organisations said in 2013 local people were being forced out of the area because of rising costs.

“Younger Bangladeshis who grew up around Spitalfields have moved out because they now have families of their own and they can’t afford to rent, let alone buy anywhere around here,” says Mr Ahmed.

Might I suggest moving to Bangladesh instead?

“A lot of the established restaurants in Brick Lane have closed down too because of the high rates.

“It was Bangladeshis that made Brick Lane famous but soon it won’t be Brick Lane anymore if they keep moving out.”

Yes yes, I heard you already. The Bangladeshi people are more authentic to London than actual English people. Those English people should go back to their own cities, am I right? London is an Asian city now.

Not everyone is willing to move though.

Retired machinist Abdul Noor purchased his four-bedroom ex-council flat in the 1990s for about £300,000 under the right to buy scheme. He says he thought of it as his “home for life”.

“We look out for each other here. Help out when we need to,” he says.

“I went away on pilgrimage for two weeks and my neighbour agreed to look after my children for me. Where else would that happen?”

Back in Bangladesh maybe?

“This is ‘social cleansing’. There is no other word for it,” says Sharon Hayward, coordinator for the London Tenants Federation, which encourages residents to fight plans to gentrify areas.

It’s social cleansing when it happens to you, but when you people are brought over and start displacing the native people, it’s “diversity”.

She says in her experience “it almost always leads to the loss of social housing”. Flats are typically rebuilt with a portion offered as “affordable housing”, with rents set at up to 80% of market rate, instead of the 30% or 40% that social housing tenants pay.

EastendHomes says it has spent about £23m to date on refurbishment, repairs and building new affordable homes for local people which is let at social rent levels. It says there are now 39 more social homes on the estate than when it took over in 2006.

It also says under the terms of a compulsory purchase order valuations would be negotiated between Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors accredited professionals, with leaseholders having the right of appeal to the Lands Tribunal.

The estate is not the only place to undergo rapid change, Spitalfields has also gentrified within a generation. Whereas the Bangladeshis who moved in during the 1970s were predominantly unskilled labourers, now their children are mainly office workers, teachers or social workers.

That’s great. Good for them. As I’ve always tried to make clear in my posts, I have nothing but respect for those immigrants who come over and actually contribute to our societies. I’m happy to hear that those people worked hard, got an education and are now giving back to society by working at these good jobs.

Certainly much better people than these pricks who should be deported to the shariah hellhole of their choosing.

Phil Maxwell, a photographer and film maker who has been documenting the visual changes to the area since the 1980s, recalls when the Bangladeshis moved in during the 1970s and 1980s, there was a lot of overcrowding in the flats.

“That’s why they originally started to meet up in Brick Lane, to chat and be together,” he says. “They used it as their sitting room, if you like.”

He says they now avoid it because of tourists and binge drinkers.

Bangladeshis have been joined by other ethnic groups and young professionals – as a result, so too businesses in the area have changed.

Petticoat Lane Market has about a third of the stalls it used to 15 years ago, say residents, who describe it as “dead most of the week, except on Sundays when it is visited by tourists”.

Spitalfields Market, once known for its independent arts and crafts stalls, is increasingly becoming populated by franchises that can afford the rent.

Mr Ahmed rejects the notion that change to the area was inevitable.

So it was OK when YOU changed the area but it’s not OK that it may change again?

“Previous immigrants like the Huguenots and the Jews chose to move out of their own accord when their fortunes improved,” he said.

“In this case, residents on the estate risk being left behind by the rapid rise in property prices they won’t benefit from and ultimately they could be forced out”.

“London is disappearing, it is losing its identity,” says Crisis homeless charity worker Yolanda de los Buies, who has lived in Brune House, on the Holland Estate, for 18 years.

I agree that London is losing its identity, but not for the reasons you think. It’s losing its identity because the native English people are being driven out and replaced by non-English.

She says about 15 years ago Spitalfields used to have the highest density of artists anywhere in Europe but that has all changed now.

“Art and culture and community is being flattened by money making machines,” she says. “London is becoming a luxury business and commuter city without soul.

“Rich people bring money but they don’t bring anything else with them – no art, no culture, no community spirit.”

Yes, it’s all very sad. I’m sure a few decades ago the native Londoners said similar things though when you and your kind arrived.

So, is it obvious yet? Diversity is only good when native whites become a minority in an area. If the opposite happens, it’s an outrage.

The Africanisation of Europe

Interesting video. I guess even the mainstream can’t cover up the obvious reality of what this migrant situation means for the future of Europe.

The video points out the very real dangers this is having for Europe. Criminals and terrorists posing as asylum seekers. The strain on European services. The ethic tensions. It also shows the fact that it isn’t Libyans trying to escape from the chaos of Libya, but rather people from neighbouring countries pouring into Libya, taking advantage of the chaos and using it as a gateway to Europe  and a “better life” (one that involves parasiting off the European people).

This of course is a completely insane situation. We’re literally being told that people who are deliberately coming to Libya from other countries need to escape from the dangers of Libya and we’re expected to believe that the only place they can possibly go to for safety is Europe. The idea of telling them to go back to the countries they came to Libya from has never crossed anyone’s mind.

How much longer can this last before someone in the mainstream points out this reality?

Indian minister points out the truth to Sweden

I’m sure people remember the horrific story a few years ago about a young Indian woman who was gang raped and murdered on a bus. That story shocked the world and quite rightly disgusted a lot of people. Since then, India has had its reputation tarnished, and is looked at as being one of the worst places in the world for sexual assaults. Well recently, India’s women’s minister visited Sweden and pointed out some sad facts.

From The Local

Gandhi began her short visit to Sweden by claiming that India is among the countries with the least number of rapes in the world. “We have four rapes per 100,000 women, while Sweden has more than 130,” she said in an interview with Swedish television network, SVT on Sunday.

The problem of rape in India was highlighted in 2012 when a young woman died after a gang rape on a bus in Delhi. Since then a number of high-profile sexual assaults has further tarnished India’s reputation.

However, according to Gandhi, the resultant huge protests in the country has created greater awareness among the public and led to more women daring to report rape. However, Indian women’s rights advocates are likely to criticise Gandhi’s comments – they claim that there is still a huge problem with unreported rape in India.

Rape is a sensitive subject and the BBC documentary “India’s Daughter” about the rape in Delhi, was banned in India earlier this year.

Gandhi is visiting Sweden to inaugurate Namaste Stockholm, a festival organised by the Indian embassy to showcase India as a culture and tourism hub. She will also participate in a discussion on gender diversity.

Now I don’t know if the statistics she posted were correct. Even from what I’ve read, 130 out of every 100,000 seems far too high for Sweden. However, I think it’s important that she’s actually pointing out what’s really going on. The world has rightly condemned what’s been happening to women in India, but I never hear people talking about what’s going on in Sweden. In fact, most genuinely don’t even know about it, and whenever I tell them, they’re completely shocked.

I think the reason why is obvious of course. The world at large doesn’t care when the victims are white women, unless the perpetrators are white men of course. Then you would never hear the end of it. In Sweden however, the victims are almost always native whites and the perpetrators 99% of the time are either Arabs or blacks. Seeing as this is the case, it can’t ever be mentioned because it would draw too much attention to the failures and dangers of multiculturalism. In India on the other hand, the women are non-white so it’s OK to draw attention to their suffering.

Every day the double standard gets more and more obvious.

The tide may finally be turning in our favour :)

So edgy. So brave and heroic standing up against oppression. It's just a shame that those racist/sexist white men decided that they don't want to genocided.
So edgy. So brave and heroic standing up against oppression. It’s just a shame that those racist/sexist white men decided that they don’t want to genocided.

I don’t believe I have ever discussed this topic before, but recently a “diversity officer” in a British university came under fire for banning all men and all white people (including women) from a meeting about diversity. She then drew even more negative attention by tweeting #KillAllWhiteMen on twitter. Of course as we all know, if somebody was to say the same thing about any other demographics, they’d more than likely be thrown in prison straight away and charged with a hate crime. Well it seems we may finally be seeing hate filled whinorities like her being held to same standards as all us evil white heterosexual men at last.

From London Evening Standard

Police have launched an investigation into a students’ union diversity officer alleged to have tweeted the hashtag “kill all white men”.

Goldsmiths’ University union’s welfare and diversity officer Bahar Mustafa sparked a race row by asking white people not to attend an event on diversifying the curriculum.

A petition calling for her to be removed from her job on the union then alleged she used “hate speech” on social media.

She had previously defended her position by saying that minority women could not be racist.

This is what these people actually believe. They genuinely think that it’s impossible for them to be racist because racism requires both prejudice and power. They can have all the prejudice in the world, but they don’t have the power, because the country is majority white (and therefore, whites have all the power by their logic). The fact that the average white person has absolutely no institutional power at all is irrelevant. The fact that there are strict laws to protect minorities from discrimination, but not the majority whites is irrelevant. The fact that affirmative action exists to help minorities but not the majority whites is irrelevant. The fact that the media constantly demonises white people, but not minorities is irrelevant. We still have all the power apparently, and we all use this power to oppress minorities because we’re evil.

But Scotland Yard today confirmed officers are investigating allegations about her posts on social media.

A spokesman said: “Police received a complaint on 7 May about a racially motivated malicious communication that had been made on a social media account. There have been no arrests and enquiries are continuing.”

How hard is it to investigate? Just go on to her twitter page and find the tweet. If she has since deleted it, I’m sure plenty of screenshots were taken by people who saw it.

It comes as Goldsmiths distanced itself from Ms Mustafa following her comments by saying she is “not an employee of the university and is not a student.”

Then why is she even there? What business does she have at the university if she’s neither a staff member or a student? What gives her the right to exclude actual students from important meetings relating to the university?

The university said it is in “active discussions” with the union, adding: “We are treating all concerns with sensitivity and with the utmost urgency.

“The Students’ Union is independent of Goldsmiths, University of London. It is run by student officials elected by union members.

“Both the University and the Students’ Union are committed to fighting all forms of oppression, including racism, sexism and any other form of bigotry.”

Good, so get rid of the hate filled wench then. She has no place there if you really do feel that way.

If the petition to have Ms Mustafa removed from her post on the union attracts the signatures of three per cent of Goldsmiths’ student body, a vote of no confidence will be held.

The vote would require a two thirds majority for her to lose her job on the union.

I’ll be eager to see what happens here.

In a response to the petition, Ms Mustafa, 27, acknowledged the use of the term “white trash” on an official Twitter account had been “not professional”.

But she claimed the “kill all white men” hashtag – and other similar posts – had been “in-jokes and ways that many people in the queer feminist community express ourselves”.

Calling for a genocide is OK if you’re only joking.

OK, I admit, that I think this image is hilarious. I have a morbid sense of humour, I admit it.
OK, I admit, that I think this image is hilarious. I have a morbid sense of humour, I admit it.

“It’s a way of reclaiming the power from the trauma many of us experience as queers, women, people of colour, who are on the receiving end of racism, misogyny and homophobia daily,” she added.

The Evening Standard has approached Ms Mustafa and Goldsmiths’ Student Union for further comment.

Well then if you’re experiencing so much trauma being around all those white men, may I make a suggestion to you? Go back to the country you came from, where there are no white men to cause you any trauma. You actually have the option to that. We white people however don’t, seeing as the world has decided that there are no white countries. There are black countries, Arab countries, Asian countries etc., then there are multicultural countries (which have white people and people of every other demographic). Unlike you, we have nowhere to escape to, if you cause us trauma. So why not do us all a favour and just leave already?

This situation once again. Where is the logic? Why come here if you think we're just oppressive monsters. I certainly wouldn't go to a country where I thought I would be oppressed. If for some reason I was stupid enough to do just that, I certainly wouldn't have the arrogance to demand they change to make me more comfortable. I'd just either put up with it, or return home.
This situation once again. Where is the logic?

Why come to a country if you think the people there are oppressive monsters? I certainly wouldn’t go to a country where I thought I would be oppressed. If for some reason I was stupid enough to do just that, I certainly wouldn’t have the arrogance to demand they change to make me more comfortable. I’d just either put up with it, or return home.

If nothing else however, I’m delighted to see that other people have had enough of this nonsense and are standing up for themselves. I’d really love to see her face if she lost her position, and actually had to face criminal charges for calling for a genocide.

Maybe for real this time :)
Maybe for real this time 🙂

EDIT: I forgot to mention, a Jew journalist ran with the story and gave his opinion. Much like the other Jew I posted a video of yesterday, who was ranting about how evil “whiteness” is, this guy did the whole “I’m a white guy when I’m criticising white people, but I’m a Jew when I’m a victim” act.

Article can be read here

See what I mean? This is something they do a lot. Claim to be white to stir up hatred against us. Claim to be a Jew later so they can avoid said hatred.
See what I mean? This is something they do a lot. Claim to be white to stir up hatred against us. Claim to be a Jew later so they can avoid said hatred.

Two stories. Two different solutions. One stupid country.

What’s this?

Sweden behaving in a ridiculous manner?

No, that couldn’t possibly be the case…could it?

Puzzled male shrugging wearing lab coat

From Breitbart

Sweden knows how to save the world from Islamic State (IS) terrorists as they tire of beheadings, crucifixions, murders and random acts of extrajudicial killing. Just be very, very nice to them.

According to WND news service, a programme to help jaded IS fighters rejoin society has started in Sweden’s Örebro Municipality, where jihadists can obtain “psychological help to overcome traumatic experiences they may have suffered while fighting in Iraq and Syria.”

The Swedish newspaper Expressen reports that councillor Rasmus Persson advocates offering terrorists jobs so they don’t “feel alienated” as they endure their post-battlefield existential funk. At the same time Stockholm has released a document outlining its “strategy against violent extremism.”

Here is a translated excerpt from that nine-page guide to helping jihadists when they return home.

Post-perspective: When a person wishes to leave a violent extremist grouping or coming home from combat overseas, it is crucial to provide customized inclusion efforts. Even then, it is important to have a local cooperation between various actors. Voluntary organizations can provide targeted support and advice. Even faith communities working with advice, but also psychosocial support.

When it comes to people who participated in combat there is likely to be great need of health efforts. Therefore, it is important to establish cooperation between social services, social psychiatry and drug units, as well as health centers and psychiatric services (trauma, PTSD, etc.)

When it comes to security, it is important that cooperation between social services, income support, employment and other efforts by the Labour Department, as well as assistance with job placement.
Finally, the accommodation issue is a prerequisite that must work. Therefore, cooperative housing companies needs to be included in the post-perspective.”

Councillor Persson agrees. He told the news program Tvärsnytt, “We have discussed how we should work for these guys who have come back, and to prevent them from returning to the fighting, and that they should be helped to process the traumatic experiences they have been through.”

All this fast-tracked past the queue of law-abiding immigrants and indigenous Swedes. Such conspicuous acts of kindness to avowed Islamic murderers are not cheap, either. That’s why Sweden’s official coordinator against violent extremism, Mona Sahlin – a former leader of the Social Democrat Party – advocates using taxpayer funds to underwrite the services.

WND reports one Swedish soldier stationed in Kabul during his third mission in Afghanistan is not so sure the plan will work or even if it is available to those on the front line taking the fight to IS. He posted a challenge on Facebook and asked that Sweden extend the program to its own warriors returning from active duty.

“In a few months, I’m back in Sweden after being deployed in Afghanistan, against the Taliban and others who have really jeopardizing development in this very sore country,” Frederick Brandberg wrote. “There is no permanent job waiting for me when I come home.”

Brandberg added: “It would be wonderful if I was met with a comparable program after my homecoming, after which I could feel safe in having a regular job, with monthly income and a social stable situation in the society where I wouldn’t need to wonder whether I’m wanted or not.”

In November 2014, the Swedish government estimated between 250 and 300 of its citizens have traveled to Syria and Iraq to join ISIS.

Just two months ago, Sweden’s national job agency fired all of its own contracted “immigrant resettlement assistants” because they were recruiting fighters for ISIS.

I’ve discussed this topic before about how the idiotic Swedes are actually willing to bend over backwards to help ISIS fighters return to Sweden and integrate with their society. Giving them jobs, using taxpayer money to help them deal with their “trauma”. Yeah, I’m sure they were traumatised, brutally torturing/ beheading/ crucifying all those infidels. However, there’s a reason why I’m bringing this topic up again. Besides the fact that it’s a new story discussing the same issue, it comes at the same time as another story that I thought was very interesting.

From NY Times

A Bangladeshi blogger and secular activist who was hacked to death on Tuesday would still be alive if Sweden had not blocked his planned visit to Stockholm this month to celebrate World Press Freedom Day, according to the Swedish chapter of PEN, an international writers group.

The Swedish Foreign Ministry said Tuesday that its diplomats were “horrified by the murder” of Ananta Bijoy Dash, who wrote about secularism and science for Free Mind, a website that the Bangladeshi-American blogger Avijit Roy ran before being killed in February by machete-wielding assailants in Dhaka, the capital. Islamist extremists took responsibility for Mr. Dash’s death, near his home in the northeastern city of Sylhet.

In a blistering statement released the same day, however, Swedish PEN revealed that Mr. Dash would have been in Stockholm this week as the group’s guest but that the Swedish Embassy in Dhaka denied him a visa.

According to the writers’ group, the embassy, in an email rejecting Mr. Dash’s request, cited concerns that he might try to stay in Sweden, or another of the European Union countries known as the Schengen area. “You belong to a category of applicants where there is always a risk involved when granting a visa that you will not leave Schengen area after the visit,” the embassy wrote. “Furthermore, the purpose of your trip is not urgent enough to grant you visa.”

The Swedish Migration Agency confirmed to BBC News that it had rejected Mr. Dash’s request for a visa.

The writers’ group, which promotes literature and freedom of expression, said that with Mr. Dash’s killing it would demand further explanation from the embassy.

Mr. Dash, the third secularist blogger to have been killed in recent months, had also written a book about Charles Darwin, the activist Taslima Nasreen noted. In February, Mr. Dash posted a playful tribute to Darwin on his Facebook page.

Secular activists rallied on the streets on Wednesday to demand that Mr. Dash’s killers be brought to justice.

So there you have it. At roughly the same time that an innocent and decent non-Swede is being rejected for Asylum in Sweden (resulting in his death at the hands of extremists. One of the tweets in the link claims Al Qaeda was responsible), Sweden is doing their best to bring back a bunch of ISIS fighters, who openly hate the Western way of life, and would happily butcher every single Swedish person. They literally give preference to killers over innocent people who are at risk of becoming victims of other killers with a similar ideology.

I just don’t have it in me anymore to express my contempt for that country. They really are pathetic.

Dutch immigrants literally demanding that white kids be forced into their classrooms against their will.

It’s getting to the point now where I actually don’t care if I’m starting to sound racist in my postings. The fact is, I know my feelings better than anyone else knows them, and I can say with 100% honesty that I absolutely don’t hate people based on their racial group. However, I’m sick of the fact that the world displays such blatant unfair bias against white people and I’m tired of being civil all the time. For the past few months, I’ve constantly pointed out examples of this bias against us. As someone who believes in true equality, I believe that we have as much right as anyone else to exist as a distinct racial group.

The whole point of this diversity agenda is to hunt down every single white person out there and force them to integrate outside of their own group whether they want to or not. Despite the fact that every other racial and ethnic group in the world has the right to freedom of association, the right to pride in themselves, and the right to their own spaces, it has long since been determined that white people don’t have any such rights. We must never follow our basic biological instincts of wanting to associate with our own people (don’t deny it, you know damn well that you naturally feel more of an affinity to people who are similar to yourself than to people who are completely different from you). Following basic biological drives is evil if you’re a white person. You must be forced to integrate with other groups and have no space of your own. If you end up getting murdered/raped/bred out of existence, that’s just too bad. You deserve it for the crime of being born white.

From Yahoo News

Amsterdam (AFP) – Faced with an increasingly segregated education system, Dutch immigrant children have taken to the streets of their ethnically mixed Amsterdam neighbourhood seeking “white” pupils to attend their schools and help their integration.

Who cares if those children are happy in the schools they are in already, or if their parents sent them to those schools specifically for a reason? They have absolutely no right to go to a school of their choosing and must be forced to attend another school whether they like it or not.

Around 100 schoolchildren — Arabs, Turks, Africans, Moroccans — accompanied by their parents and teachers, wore provocative dazzling white T-shirts emblazoned with “Is this white enough for you?”.


Dutch native Annelies, 10, and immigrants’ daughter Aminata, 11, have been friends since kindergarten and are also wearing the shirts, which have “All children have the right to integrate” written on the back.

Except for the fact that what you’re calling for isn’t simply a right, because a right implies choice. What you’re referring to is an obligation, because you’re forcing it on people whether they want it or not.

They “want more white children in the school to learn about each other’s cultures,” said Aminata, her smiling face framed by dangling African braids during Friday’s protest.

“It’s important for later,” said the blonde-haired Annelies. “When we’re grown up we will have to deal with different cultures, we should already start learning to live together.”

I’ve got a better idea. How about instead of dealing with different cultures, you all give up your culture and assimilate into the culture of your host nation? You obviously left your old country to come to your new host nation because the host nation was in some way superior to your old country. So if the host country is superior, why should you try to change it to be more like the culture you left behind? Wouldn’t you therefore be dragging down the host nation to an inferior level. If, on the other hand your culture is superior, then just go back to your home country and have as much of your culture as you want. Everybody wins that way.

“At the moment there’s only one boy in our class who is 100 percent Dutch, although we live in a mixed neighbourhood, it’s ridiculous,” she said.


The pupils’ two schools – De Avonturijn and Catharinaschool – are considered “black” in this ethnically mixed southern Amsterdam neighbourhood, as more than 90 percent of their pupils are from immigrant backgrounds.

– ‘Black schools’ –

The number of new pupils signing up continues to drop and the schools are now threatened with closure, so today they’re going door-to-door, ringing doorbells and delivering flyers saying “We’re looking for white pupils”.

“When, for different reasons, a school ‘becomes blacker’, it’s very difficult to reverse the trend,” said Diane Middelkoop, spokeswoman for the two schools.

Yeah there’s a reason for that. It’s called white flight. It’s because people naturally want to be with their own kind. The less white a school is, the more alienated white people are going to feel in their own area, so naturally, they’ll want to go somewhere where they don’t feel like an outsider. It’s different when an outsider from a racial group immigrates to an area where they are in the minority, because they willingly choose that, and know what they are getting into. Being in the area you grew up in, and seeing the demographics change around you however, is naturally, a lot more uncomfortable to experience.

This image doesn't actually mean anything. It just came up when I googled white flight, and I thought it was pretty funny.
This image doesn’t actually mean anything. It just came up when I googled white flight, and I thought it was pretty funny.

“White children’s parents no longer want to be part of the school. I can understand that: we all want to feel at home and that means that we want to see people who share our origins and culture,” she said.

Exactly what I’ve just been saying. There’s nothing evil about that.

For some, the phenomenon shows that racism is rampant in Dutch culture.

Oh of course racism is rampant in Dutch culture. Dutch people are white, and as has already been pointed out time and time again, white people are all automatically racist by virtue of being white.

The Jew professor doing the usual “claim to be white while I demonise whites, claim to be a racial Jew when shit hits the fan against whites” that so many Jews like to do.

“It’s shameful that it’s come to this, that children have to take to the street to go to school with white children,” said resident Joan, 80, originally from the former Dutch colony of Suriname, tears in her eyes.

Here's the world's smallest violin for your tears.
Here’s the world’s smallest violin for your tears.

She blames parents who take their children out of what Dutch media call “black schools”.

“It’s racism and I’m ashamed. There was always a bit of racism in this country, but today it’s serious, it has to stop,” she said.

This is essentially what happens. You can point out obvious facts  and statistics to show the flaws in multiculturalism, and they'll just respond with "racist". They won't actually prove anything you said to be wrong, but they automatically win by demonising you.
A reminder that this man was a communist mass murderer who was essentially genociding the native Russians.

Seriously, I don’t care how often you use that word. The only reason it has power is because we allow ourselves to fear it. Call people racist all you want. The more you say it, the less effective it becomes as people will just think to themselves “you know what fuck it, I’d rather be called a racist than put up with this bullshit”.

– Racism or demographics? –

At the other end of the street, florist Wim Barlag has worked here for 50 years, has a son at one of the schools and has a different explanation.

“More and more families are leaving, making way for students — the problem is there’s simply not many children left,” he said.

Possible, but that’s also very alarming. If the native Dutch aren’t having children, it means they are being ethnically replaced by the newcomers. Literally a non-violent genocide.

The Netherlands has a reputation for tolerance, but racial tensions and discrimination are on the increase.

“I want my children to be integrated in Dutch society and to learn about different cultures,” said 35-year-old mother and housewife Majda Khatibi.

The Netherlands calls on immigrants to take part in Dutch society, through work or study. Once they have learnt the language, they must take an integration exam to make sure they fit in Dutch society.

This makes perfect sense. Prove you actually want to integrate and be a part of Dutch society. Once you have proven yourself maybe then, things will improve. Let it happen naturally, not by force.

As immigrant numbers have risen, so has the popularity of far-right politicians, including anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders who criticises immigrants for not integrating enough.

In fairness, can you blame him when you see things like this?
In fairness, can you blame him when you see things like this?

Marching door to door, the children chant: “Don’t think black, don’t think white, don’t think black and white: think the colours of your heart.”

Yet you’re the ones who brought up colour to begin with by specifically demanding that white children be forced to join your schools whether they like it or not.