This is just ridiculous. How the fuck did a Nigerian guy get to Iceland in the first place? I mean surely, he would have had to have passed through several other safe countries beforehand in his quest for “asylum”.
A man is suspected of having infected young women with HIV. The capital area police are investigating the case against the man, who is not Icelandic, in partnership with the office of the Directorate of Health.
The man will be remanded in custody later today while the initial investigation continues, according to a police press release.
RÚV has since confirmed initial reports that the man in question is a Nigerian asylum seeker who came to Iceland last August.
The police statement says that part of the investigation includes finding out if any more women have been in contact with the man, and whether they might also be infected.
The statement talks only of a serious infectious disease, but chief epidemiologist Haraldur Briem confirmed with reporters that the man is suspected of having transmitted HIV. Neither Haraldur nor Alda Hrönn Jóhannsdóttir, deputy police chief, would discuss the case in further detail at this stage.
The HIV virus is spread through bodily fluids, including through sex and through blood—for example by sharing needles. The only protection against sexually-transmitted HIV is the use of condoms, according to the Directorate of Health.
HIV is a life-threatening illness if allowed to develop without treatment. It can develop into AIDS, which causes the immune system to shut down and lead to death; often years after initial infection. There is not yet a cure for HIV, but it is controllable with medication and infection is detected through blood tests.
Details of the man’s suspected crimes have not been released. One likely explanation for his arrest could be engaging in unprotected sex with the women without telling them he has HIV—an act which would be against the law.
Let me repeat, how the fuck did this guy get to Iceland from Nigeria in the first place?
Also, I gotta ask, what the fuck were all these women thinking having unprotected sex with a newly arrived “asylum seeker” from Africa, when it’s a well known fact that HIV is an epidemic on that continent? I’m not normally the kind to victim blame, and I do feel genuine sympathy for what has happened to them, but holy shit, I just can’t get over the stupidity of that decision, a decision that seemingly lots of them made. I just don’t understand, was he really that irresistible to that many women that he was able to sleep with that many in a year?
How dare these anti-semitic, racist, Nazis, try to escape diversity? Don’t they realise that diversity is the most wonderful thing in the whole world, and only crazy people would want to escape from it? Besides, they have no choice, and must accept their punishment. Don’t they understand that their great grandparents did the holocaust, and that they must be punished for their great grandparent’s crimes by accepting unlimited diversity and all the horrors it entails? No dear reader, that isn’t a contradiction at all. Diversity is both a wonderful thing, and a punishment for past sins committed by the ancestors of currently living white people. It isn’t a contradiction because we don’t normally say both of those things at the same time. We say it’s wonderful and enriching in some contexts, and a punishment in other contexts. If you disagree with what I’ve just said, you’re probably a racist yourself, or if you’re a guy, you probably are just angry because you have a small penis.
So lets take a look at a video of these horrible monsters, who are trying to escape from diversity (clearly so they can band together and plan another holocaust).
The documentary was taken from MDR, a German TV station. It was released 2 days ago.
Interpret it as you will. The original report was over 8 minutes, I edited the most relevant parts together. In particular, I have left out parts of a pensioner couple (self proclaimed socialists), who have been confirmed by various sources, including their neighbors, for deliberately making up stories to defame these families whom she hates for ideological reasons (they’re ‘Nazis’). Nobody except them rebelled against the settlers so far, as they are clearly no danger to anyone. They have provided no proof of the ridiculous claims, a few of them were Hitler salutes, spitting on them and telling them to “Fuck off, Antifa Scum”, which sounds more like something coming from an insecure Skinhead rather than a loving father of 4 children.
In my opinion the report is drastically exaggerated: Neither is the movement is as big as they make it out to be nor are any of these settlers a danger for anyone. Quite the contrary: They are peaceful, mind their own business and actually help the surrounding communities, which the report must “shamefully” admit.
According to the report, the real danger of the Völkisch settlers is that they are decent neighbors, craftsmen, self sustaining, helpful and have plenty of German children.
Apparently this acting is just a facade – their true motive is supposedly “racism, antisemitism and Nazism.”
The Amadeu-Antonio fund is well known for faking statistics and making up stories to fit their narrative. These quotes are from their spokeswoman, Anetta Kahane:
“In Eastern Germany are not enough people, who are visible minorities, for example blacks”
“If I make a wish, it would be a second turning point, infrastructural, emotional, cultural”
“It’s a confession of failure that one third of this country is still white”
How can he possibly suggest that this video is exaggerating? I mean just listen to how sinister the background music is. They’re clearly hate filled monsters, who are secretly building gas chambers in their village for anyone who isn’t Aryan. All this talk about self sufficiency, farming, craftsmanship, and raising large loving families, is clearly just a cover story for their true intentions.
What, “proof” you say? How dare you ask for proof? All that matters is that we believe this is happening and that’s evidence enough. Although clearly, video commenters seem to disagree.
I just don’t understand how these comments could be so opposed to resisting this horrific behaviour? Don’t they understand that these people are clearly planning something heinous? I mean, just think about it really. Farming. Making their own clothing. Building things themselves. Raising large families with traditional values. Living with their own kind of people, isolated from the outside world. Does that remind you of anything? That’s right, I am of course talking about
This is terrible. How can people not see this? As we all know, the Amish are the most evil and reprehensible monsters on the planet. The Amish commit countless acts of violence and all around evil against outsiders. The only reason we never hear about it of course, is because it’s never reported, seeing as the Amish control most of the media in the western world, as well as our financial systems, governments, Hollywood etc. I’m actually being very brave reporting this, as I risk being assassinated by the Amish for telling you all this.
Clearly, these German people are trying to become a German version of the Amish. They need to be stopped now, because if we wait too long, it will be too late. They will become too powerful, and more than likely murder us all.
I’m no economist, but this sounds really bad. I’ve heard people say before that the bust part of boom and bust cycles happen once every seven years or so. 2008 was the last big crash. If the cycle is true, we’re due one later this year. China is the second largest economy in the world. They are the largest foreign holder of American debt. An economic collapse there will surely spread to the rest of the world before long.
Chinese stocks suffered a huge blow as the Shanghai share index recorded its biggest one-day fall since early 2007.
The Shanghai Composite Index closed down 8.5% at 3,725.56 with most of the plunge occurring in the last hour of trading.
Other stock benchmarks around the world were also lower.
In Europe, Britain’s FTSE 100 fell 0.3% to 6,563.67 and Germany’s DAX shed 1% to 11,232.43. France’s CAC 40 dropped 1.1% to 4,999.60.
The fall on the Shanghai market was the biggest one-day decline in Chinese stocks since an 8.8% plunge on February 27, 2007.
Some analysts said the dive was sparked by brokerages restricting credit used to finance stock purchases, also known as margin trading.
Chinese authorities took aggressive steps to stabilise the market after it tumbled last month. But analysts have been sceptical that such efforts could be sustained.
“The continuous check on margin trading by security companies has triggered today’s sell-off,” said Xu Xiaoyu, a market strategist at China Investment Securities. “In addition, the recent economic data shows it still takes time for the economy to recover from its sluggishness.”
The 30% slide in Chinese shares in June came after a year-long rally took the market to multi-year highs even as the world’s second-biggest economy slowed.
A period of stability was achieved after the government announced support measures earlier this month that included forbidding major shareholders from selling any of their shares and ordering state companies and others to buy.
Many companies also voluntarily suspended trading in their stocks on the Shanghai exchange and its smaller counterpart in Shenzhen.
For quite some time now, people have been predicting that much like how the 19th century belonged to Britain, and the 20th century belonged to America, that the 21st century would belong to China. However, there was also a time, back in the 1980s, when Japan’s rapid economic growth had many people convinced that Japan would eventually become the number one economy in the world. Instead, everything went to hell in the early 90s, and Japan has been in a state of slow decline ever since.
I can’t help but wonder, is something similar happening to China as what happened in Japan? Could we perhaps be seeing the beginning of a long Chinese economic decline? Whatever is happening, I predict this much. It’s not going to be good for the economic prospects of the rest of the world.
A little over a week ago, I posted a video of a bunch of Danish cucks begging so called “refugees” (ie., economic migrants) to come into their country and give them the gift of cultural enrichment. I had thought very highly of Denmark before seeing that video and needless to say, i was very disappointed to see such stupidity. Thankfully enough, the Danes have made a decision, which redeems them in my eyes. I guess those pathetic cucks in the video really were just nothing more than a vocal minority afterall.
The Danish government is to take out adverts in newspapers in targeted countries to tell would-be illegals to stay at home.
The move is going ahead despite rubbishing a similar plan only weeks ago by a rival political party.
Denmark’s ruling Venestre party called plans by the Danish People’s Party (Dansk Folkpartei, DF), the largest party in Danish politics, to create a video campaign targeted at potential illegal migrants abroad ‘un-Danish’. In the intervening days the case for taking more radical steps to limit migration to the nation has grown, and now the integration minister has announced the newspaper campaign.
Remarking that “There is something strange about the fact that a refugee would travel through several countries before ending up in Denmark”, fiery Inger Støjberg now seems to be making her job just as much about discouraging migration to Denmark as it is about integrating people after they have arrived.
It is not clear which nations would have their newspapers filled with Danish government anti-adverts, but Støjberg has already mentioned Turkey as a potential target. Almost 30,000 illegals crossed from Turkey to Europe via Greece with help from human traffickers in just 20 days between June and July.
Denmark’s conservative Venestre led, Dansk Folkpartei backed government has already cut benefits for migrants by 45-per-cent, replacing unemployment benefit for newcomers with ‘integration benefit’. The new benefit is only paid in full if a migrant learns Danish, as reported by Breitbart London last month.
The move would feature heavily in the proposed adverts to put off migrants. Støjberg said: “The ads will contain factual information on the halving of benefits as well as other restrictions that we will be enacting. That kind of information spreads very quickly”, reports TheLocal.dk.
Good job Denmark. Thank you for reminding me once again that you really are, a far superior country to Sweden. Long may you continue to preserve yourselves.
So the Huffington Post has decided to write “an open letter to white men in America”. Nothing new or revolutionary here. Just the usual “you all have undeserved privilege based on your skin tone and should feel bad about it” nonsense, that seems to be springing up more and more frequently. Just how much longer can they push this bullshit, before people realise the obvious reality that white people are in actuality, the most discriminated against race in the world?
You didn’t earn it. More than likely aren’t yet prepared to either admit to it or lose it. This letter, written by one of you, is offered to invite you on a journey of insight, honesty, hard truth and just living.
Well we’re off to a nice start. Apparently, because the author is “one of us” that means he can speak for us, and automatically gives him the right to project his own sense of privilege onto the rest of us.
Privilege can be hard to see, mostly because of what doesn’t happen to us when we have it.
Interesting theory. Clearly American blacks aren’t able to see their own privileges.
We aren’t getting arrested at four times our population rate.
Hmm, is he suggesting that innocent blacks are just being arrested for no reason, while guilty whites are being allowed to go free? Ok, first of all, lets look at the racial demographics of America.
In 2010, whites made up 64.6% of the overall population. Blacks made up 12.3% of the population. Latinos, made up 16.1%. The combined white/Latino percentage is 80.7%. This is important to remember, because in FBI crime statistics, Latinos are counted as “white” when they commit crimes, even though they are regarded as a completely different racial group whenever they are victims of some injustice, or are campaigning for their group interests (for example, having their own Latino Student Unions, and lobby group, La Raza). Essentially, they get to have their crimes attributed to the white population, without being made to feel as if they benefit from so called “white privilege”
So, blacks commit 28.1 of all the crimes in America, despite making up only 12.3% of the population, whereas whites and Latinos combined commit 69.3% of the crimes, despite making up a combined total of of 80.7% of the population. also, I guarantee that a large part of that percentage could be attributed to the Latino part who (if incarceration rates are any indicator) commit far more crime per capita than whites. Gee, maybe that’s why blacks are getting arrested so much more than whites. They commit far more crimes.
We aren’t being followed when walking through a department store wearing a sweat shirt with a hood.
See above for the reasons why this happens.
Real estate agencies didn’t write codes, rules and laws that kept us out of the high rent districts and middle class neighborhoods.
Well lucky enough, Obama plans to rectify this with his insane forced diversity idea. It doesn’t matter that those middle class neighborhoods exist, because the people who live there have middle class levels of income. Obama plans to force change, whether it’s fair or not.
Property values don’t go down when more than 10 percent of our neighborhood is saturated with people of our race.
Yeah, I’m sure it’s only because the markets have blind hatred for your skin colour. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that you have a habit of destroying the areas you live in.
Yeah, property prices obviously just decline because of hatred for your skin tone, and has absolutely nothing to do with how you effect the area.
Our children aren’t sitting in classrooms with teachers who are likely not to have even a minor degree in the courses they are teaching.
I don’t know enough about this issue to address it, so rather than trying to BS my way through, I’ll admit my ignorance on this topic. Pretending to know what I’m talking about would drag me down to the level of those I’m opposed to.
Young white men are not being gunned down by black police officers in epidemic numbers.
Yet more whites are shot by cops than blacks. You never hear about any of those cases in the media though, yet practically every single time a black person is shot by a cop, it’s a global news story. You could of course argue that per capita, more blacks are killed than whites, and that would indeed be true. However, if you consider how much more crime they also commit per capita, that means that they’re naturally going to be in conflict with law enforcement more often. Hence, it all balances out in the end. It still doesn’t explain why their deaths get so much more attention, when whites are supposedly the more privileged group, and therefore the ones, whose deaths should invoke more outrage. No, that certainly doesn’t fit the narrative at all.
Our churches aren’t being burned to the ground, nor or our church members in danger of being gunned down in prayer meetings.
That one church shooting by that one white nut was certainly a terrible crime, and I condemn it as such. However, look on the bright side… you’re still experiencing much less cases of interracial violence than we are.
We are not saying to ourselves as part of a white man’s code of conduct that when a police car drives by us without pulling us over even though we are exceeding the speed limit something like: “Well, once again I didn’t get pulled over because I’m white.”
Stupid anecdotal nonsense. Means absolutely nothing. Next point.
We are not saying to ourselves when our child didn’t get her college application rejected with a questionable GPA something like: “Well, thank God she’s white and that her mother graduated from that school 25 years ago.”
Thank goodness for affirmative action giving you the leg up instead then, right?
We are not saying to ourselves when the prosecutor reduces our son’s charges from aggravated assault to loitering and sets him free with a small fine and time served: “Wow, that white prosecutor made sure my white son got a break that the black man who got convicted of that crime last week didn’t get.”
Examples of this happening?
The journey to seeing and understanding the pernicious consequences of privilege includes the harder work of seeing what isn’t there to be seen.
I have started practicing this as a discipline.
When I walk into a convenience store to get a receipt for my gas and the young woman at the counter greets me with a smile and a kind word, I tell myself “She felt comfortable doing that because I’m white.”
Or maybe she’s just providing good customer service.
When I see a highway patrolman pass me by while I’m exceeding the speed limit or, as actually happened two weeks ago, I get pulled over for that and let off without a ticket, I say to myself: “That happened because I’m white.”
Or maybe you were just polite with them so they decided to let it slide. I’m sure if you acted like a dick and started mouthing off at the cops, it would have been a different story.
When I drive through the many border checkpoints we have set up here in the Southwest along the Mexican border, and as I roll down my window and make my stop at the guard gate, and as the border patrol agent simply glances at my face before waging me on with a perfunctory “have a good day,” I say to myself: “That is the result of my being white.”
You might actually be right in this case. I’m sure when they’re doing border checks along Mexico, they’re specifically looking out for Latinos trying to cross the border illegally. Obviously, there are white Mexicans too, but they aren’t as large a demographic as Latinos, hence, it’s probably not worth the effort to target every white person they see. However, congratulations. You’ve finally made a valid point.
I don’t know in the end if any of those were in fact true statements. That isn’t the point of this exercise. The point is to create a consciousness from which I can no longer let myself escape.
This is starting to remind me of something.
“It was real…in my mind”
I want to be clear about something. This solves nothing. I can notice, and still be happy and content with the privilege I am afforded.
I want to be clear about something else. Whatever solutions are going to come that we ourselves will offer the agency of our privilege for aren’t coming without this basic awareness.
When I taught White Privilege studies to a class of Masters of Divinity students at Eden Theological Seminary, the assignment I left the students with every day was this: “Tell me what you see.” There is a passage in my sacred texts that reads: “Let those who have eyes to see, see.” There is so much more to be seen than what white men will let there eyes take notice of.
I invite the white men of America with me on this journey of discovery. Ask those who don’t share your privilege to tell you what they see. It may not have escaped your attention that whether we are talking about Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice, Michael Brown, what whites see and what blacks see are not the same thing. There is a reason for that. Privilege comes at a price — and the price is the loss of a vision that admits facts that make accepting the privilege uncomfortable.
Therefore, I extend an invitation to a seeing that engenders the kind of discomfort with privilege that creates the space necessary for real justice to emerge. Don’t worry about carrying the burden of solving this pervasive injustice: for good reason, you and I won’t be entrusted with that work. But only when we see what others are more than happy to show us about ourselves will we be open then to hearing what they have to teach us about what will be required for true equality to emerge.
The acceptance of this invitation, and the resulting years of work it will take us all to open our eyes to that we have been conditioned to ignore for the sake of our privilege, is the first step in the proverbial journey of a thousand miles. White men in America, I invite you to walk this road with me.
I may not be American, but I’ll tell you what I think any sane white man there should say to you. Go fuck yourself and save your invitations for the pathetic self hating manginas who your propaganda still works on. Those of us who know what’s really happening are not interested.
The Guardian, an absolute garbage publication, which I’m convinced only employs people who despise white people, have come out praising the existence of the worlds first non-white only modelling agency. Apparently, this agency is a “true celebration of diversity”, and we all know that diversity is the best thing in the world for reasons so obvious and self-evident, that nobody ever actually says what those reasons are. We all just know and accept the vast benefits of diversity without question. Also, we all know that diversity doesn’t include white people. White people are boring and uninteresting. Why would anyone need white people for diversity, when every other demographic provides enough of it? From The Guardian
Looking at the models on Lorde Inc’s website, the first thing that strikes you is that these people are, to put it in Zoolander’s words, really, really good looking.
They just make this statement as if it’s an objective, undisputed reality. We’re all just supposed to assume that because the writer of the article says they’re good looking, it must be true. I’ve had a look at the models on the home page, and in my opinion, they aren’t particularly good looking at all. I’m not saying that I think they’re outright ugly and repulsive to look at. They’re just plain and average. None of them look like model material from what I can see, and I can’t see them looking as if they belong on a catwalk or in a catalog.
With the exception of the second girl in the second picture (tenth model overall) none of them look above average in my opinion.
Ornello has long plaits and a gap between her teeth. Mohammed is all chocolate eyes and wavy locks. And Urjii is cheekbones and expressive stare. The second thing? None of the models – about 60 in all – are white.
Just imagine if instead, the second thing was “None of the models are non-white”. Global headlines about how hate filled that agency is. Various civil rights groups going crazy. Social justice warriors would be having meltdowns on Tumblr. The point is, that it wouldn’t be allowed. More than likely, it would be illegal, because discriminating against people based on their race is illegal. So if it’s OK for an organisation to legally not hire white people based on their race, doesn’t that prove that discriminating against whites only, is allowed?
Lorde was set up in May 2014 as the first of its kind – an agency made up entirely of models of colour. It is the brainchild of Nafisa Kaptownwala, a 26-year-old Canadian art history graduate, who began to work on the fringes of fashion and noticed the lack of non-white models.
It’s quite obvious why there’s a lack of them from looking at the pictures. Besides the fact that there are less of them in the country to begin with, seeing as Britain is a white country, there’s also the sad reality that those who are there, simply aren’t as attractive as their white competitors. I mean just look at the pictures of the female models above and compare them to pictures of the following white models.
Ok lets try this again.
As a heterosexual guy, I’m not going to bother posting any pictures of white male models because quite frankly, I’m not qualified to judge what is and isn’t attractive in that case. Hence to be fair, I won’t make any such comparison. However, I am qualified to say what i would regard attractive in women, and I will say that all the above women are far better looking than any of the women from this modelling agency. Hence, they aren’t able to compete on equal footing, and need to have this superior competition eliminated.
Despite no experience in the modelling industry, she set up Lorde in London with a friend and “the next thing, people were contacting us”. A year on, and Lorde has worked with magazines including Dazed & Confused and i-D, and collaborated with London streetwear brand Cassette Playa.
Despite these relative triumphs, Kaptownwala is pessimistic about diversity in modelling in 2015. “There’s still not a massive demand because this is still a radical idea and people in fashion are not really ready for it,” she says. “How does that make me feel? In general I think, as a person of colour, you internalise. Creating this agency is a way to channel those feelings.”
It’s not that people aren’t ready for it, it’s that people aren’t interested. This nonsense rests on the stupid idea that beauty standards where just set up arbitrarily, to oppress and upset people who don’t meet those arbitrary standards. This is ridiculous and completely baseless. There is actual scientific research that discusses objective standards of beauty. Obviously, there are people whose tastes are exceptions, but these people are a minority. The modelling industry is extremely competitive, and less objectively attractive models aren’t going to be able to compete. Therefore, no business is going to want to use these less attractive models to advertise their products. It has nothing to do with people not being ready for it at all, because that implies that there will come a time when these objective beauty standards will change. Evolution doesn’t happen overnight.
If diversity – across age, race and size – is always a swirl of debate in fashion, there seems to be the signs of change, with Balmain’s Olivier Roustein (himself mixed race) championing a catwalk of all sorts of ethnicities, Rihanna becoming the first black woman in a Dior campaign and Lineisy Montero walking the Prada catwalkwith a visible afro. “Things are changing but in a minimal way,” acknowledges Kaptownwala. “But there were more models of colour on the catwalk in the 90s than there are now. It kind of goes in cycles.” She praises former model Bethan Hardison’s campaign to increase diversity on the catwalk at major brands but says “two models in a show of 30 models is not enough”.
If there’s no demand for more than the two, then tough. You can’t force people to pretend they care when they quite obviously don’t.
The dominance of white faces in fashion means her job, compared to that of a model booker at a larger agency, is a lot harder. “They work with everyone and we are fulfilling a niche,” she says. “The beauty standards are that the European is the epitome of what’s marketable, and not just to European consumers. I have spoken to magazines in Japan who only use Japanese and European models.”
You mean even those racist white supremacist Asians in Japan think Europeans are most attractive? Gee, you’d almost think that it’s actually because they are more attractive and even people from other races can see that. It’s quite possibly the same reason why white womenare victimisedmore often than any non-white racein cases of interracial rapes. No, that can’t be it at all. Clearly, it’s just a racist conspiracy that was set up to hurt the feelings of non-white models. I mean just look at this model for example. She’s clearly gorgeous, and only a blind hate filled racist would disagree.
In all seriousness, I could just look at my Facebook friends list, and I’d say a good 90% of my female friends are far better looking than that “model” is at all.
Kaptownwala believes the internet – and the culture of selfies – has a role to play in broadening what we think beautiful is, and has made an entire generation comfortable in front of the camera. “People are posing in their own ways, creating their own photo shoots,” she says. “It redefines beauty, opens things up and allows people to say ‘I want to be part of this.’”
Yeah, clearly the internet is going to undo countless millenia of human evolution, and we’re all going to suddenly believe that whatever is beautiful, is beautiful.
And if people don’t change their beliefs willingly…
Thank you Sweden for providing me with my daily dose of tragic comedy. On the one hand, it’s painful watching a country commit collective suicide in real time like this, but on the other hand, the way they’re doing it is so completely insane and ridiculous, that there is a genuinely funny element to it at times. The last post I wrote for example, about leftist morons crying racism over the gay rights parade through Muslim areas, perfectly encapsulates this comedic element. This article has a similar effect.
A female Islamists who sympathize with Muslim terrorism and ISIS may remain with the Migration Board. The Board refers to the freedom of expression and opinion, that their administrators have the right to express support for terrorist groups that rape, maim and kill Christians and other non-Muslims.
– That’s our answer right now, it is as far that we will reach in this issue, said a spokesman for the Board to the online news outlet Fria Tider.
Of course, if it was someone critical of Islam and expressed it, he or she would be sacked within minutes, because then freedom of expression no longer apply, but support of ISIS is apparently fine.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. Nothing Sweden does actually shocks me anymore. An open sympathiser of ISIS, working on the migration board. What could possibly go wrong?
The Migration Board officer, named Samiyah Warsame, was last week revealed by the Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet’s journalist and editorial writer Ivar Arpi, that Warsame expresses support for Islamism and various terrorist groups on Facebook.
Among other things, Warsame on more than one occasion clicked “like” on images that represent the Islamic state or other Islamist groups flags, she has enjoyed a tribute text written to the terrorist Omar Abdel-Rahman who is serving a prison sentence for the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, and she has liked a tribute text written to the terrorist group Hamas’ founder sheik Ahmad Yassin.
Now imagine if she had instead “liked” images or pieces of text of an anti-Islamic nature. Can you imagine what would have happened? More than likely, she would have gotten a knock on the door in the middle of the night from the thought police, and been taken to the nearest reeducation center to have those “doubleplusungood” views eliminated.
She has also herself spread quotes by notorious Islamists, including the Chechen Islamist Emir Khattab. Khattab has by the Russian secret service, been identified as the mastermind behind a number of terrorist attacks on residential buildings in Russia in September 1999, when 293 people were killed and over a thousand injured.
Good people, who the Swedish migration board should definitely consider handing out visas to. In fact, fuck the visas. Just give them full citizenship straight away.
Ivar Arpi has after exposing Warsame been accused of being “Islamophobic” by Samiyah Warsame. She did not want to reply to requests to why she liked tribute texts written to several notorious terrorists, but wrote instead on Facebook that what Arpi is trying to do, is to come up with “baseless accusations that is deliberate to increase Islam hatred and widespread Islamophobia” .
Here’s the thing with these lunatics. The actual facts don’t matter to them. It doesn’t matter that the people she is supporting have committed horrific acts of terrorism, acts they would repeat without hesitation. All that matters is “feelings”. she feels like he’s an Islamophobe for pointing these things out, therefore those feelings take precedence over the facts.
The Migration Board is the agency responsible for receiving and placing asylum seekers in Sweden. ISIS has at least one on Board.
How tolerant. Sweden you should be proud. You’re so much more tolerant than every other country. Why don’t other countries allow terrorist supporters to have a say in their migration policies?