Merkel demands that Ireland takes in more migrants.

“You will take in more migrants, whether you like it or not. There will be no excuses” ~ Merkel to the Irish

The dog faced bull dyke, and self appointed dictator of the EU, Angela Merkel, has decided that Ireland is one of three countries (the other two being Denmark and Britain) who aren’t doing their fair share to help the economic parasites migrants, who have been flooding into Europe by the thousands in order to get free everything handed to them, and to have their way with all the “whyte wimminz” they can find. Because the German government have a deranged obsession with committing genocide against their own people (as evident by the comments made by that Jew politician a while back), she seems to think that every other country should follow suit.

“They’re absolutely not just coming for free stuff. They’re fleeing a war and heading to the first safe country they can find.” ~ The kind of stupid lies we’re supposed to believe.

Unfortunately for the Germans, it seems that with the exception of Sweden, most people in most EU countries, don’t want to contribute towards the genocide of their own race. Sure, I see a few comments on various news articles saying we should do more, but most of them are clearly from self-loathing, white guilt, inflicted morons who have no understanding of cause and effect, or an ability to think longterm. They seem to have this ridiculous idea that despite the unemployment in this country, despite the housing shortage, and despite the fact that we have plenty of our own people living rough on the streets, that somehow, we can take care of an infinite supply of illiterate, uneducated (and in many cases extremely violent) Africans and Middle Easterners, who think that they’re entitled to live off the labour of Europeans.

I wasn't exagerrating when I said it was an infinite supply. They just keep on breeding. It doesn't matter if we take in 100, 5000, 70000, 10000000 etc. They'll just keep coming until we're overrun and bred out of existence.
I wasn’t exagerrating when I said it was an infinite supply. They just keep on breeding. It doesn’t matter if we take in 100, 5000, 70000, 10000000 etc. They’ll just keep coming until we’re overrun and bred out of existence.

And here we have a fantastic video which really helps the user to visualise what the graph above means.

Anytime, you point out the obvious realities to these do-gooders, regarding the fact that these people aren’t trying to escape from a war, or that it simply isn’t feasible to look after them, they usually resort to making a tangential argument about how the Irish emigrated a lot, or just resort to playing the race card. The reason they do this is obvious. There is no logical reason as to why we should take these migrants in. The entire basis of their argument usually comes down to an estrogen fueled hissy fit (and that’s just the men I’m talking about).

“Grrr, bark, bark, take the, bark, migrants in, bark, bark.” ~ Merkel isn’t even trying to justify it anymore.

Logical arguments don’t matter to Madame Merkel of course. I’m sure someone in her position knows damn well that most Europeans don’t want these migrants. She knows damn well that they aren’t legit cases, and have no right to be here. Most importantly, she knows damn well the kind of problems they cause for the indigenous Europeans. The violent attacks, terrorism, rape epidemic, and strain on services funded by working European taxpayers, are no great secret. She doesn’t care, and she’s demanding that the rest of us accept it, whether we like it or not.

From Irish Examiner

Ms Merkel was last night in Austria attending a conference of European leaders on migration. It was in Austria where the grim discovery of up to 50 dead migrants on a truck was made earlier in the day.

They shouldn’t have been on the fucking truck. In fact they shouldn’t have been on the fucking continent.

According to Channel 4 News, Ms Merkel said EU countries should distribute the refugees among them according to the countries’ wealth and she singled out Ireland, Denmark and Britain for not participating in such a programme. The three countries have an opt-out from a quota scheme for housing migrants.

And I hope our cowardly government refuses to budge on that opt-out. I don’t have any faith in them of course, but I’ll try and stay optimistic.

While being praised internationally for the rescue efforts of the naval service, the Irish Government has been urged by aid agencies to increase its intake of Syrian and Eritrean migrants, which is set at 600 people over the next two years.

What’s the fucking point in taking in 600? That doesn’t solve the problem at all. Between Africa and the Middle East, there’s probably around 2 Billion (and counting at a fast rate) potential migrants looking to get into Europe. Saving 600, as evident by the gumball video above, will not make any bit of difference towards solving this migrant problem. The more we take, the more who will be left behind thinking they deserve to get in too. How do we choose 600 migrants arbitrarily from the countless amount looking to get in? It’s completely ridiculous. All we’re doing is destroying ourselves. If we don’t want anymore dead migrants, we need to deport the ones who are already here, and make the message quite clear that none will be taken. Once the message is received that they aren’t ever going to be welcomed, they’ll stop needlessly risking their lives (and it is needless seeing as they are economic migrants, not genuine refugees fleeing danger). Why is this not obvious?

To finish off, here’s a rather bleak video about the potential future of Ireland. Lets hope people wake up, and prevent this future by saying no to Merkel’s deranged demands.

The Celtic Cross is now racist apparently.

White goyim, we must destroy all your symbols and all your ethnic pride. It has absolutely nothing to do with humiliating you. It's for your own good. You can trust us, we're God's chosen people.
White goyim, we must destroy all your symbols and all your ethnic pride. It has absolutely nothing to do with humiliating you or destroying your self respect. It’s for your own good. You can trust us, we’re God’s chosen people.

The Jewish run, anti-white, hate group known as the Anti-Defamation League is once again doing what they do best… attacking whites by trying to strip us of our history and our identity. They have decided to demonise yet another of our people’s symbols. According to these Jews (who are God’s chosen people, and therefore the most moral and upstanding people in the world, who have the right to dictate to the rest of us what is and isn’t okay), the Celtic Cross is now a symbol of hatred that needs to be eliminated.

A 2015 mugshot of a Celtic cross that murdered 30 unarmed black teens and 6 million Jews in racially motivated attacks. It's accomplices, a swastika and a confederate flag, are still believed to be at large.
A 2015 mugshot of a Celtic cross that murdered 30 unarmed black teens and 6 million Jews in racially motivated attacks. Its accomplices, a swastika and a confederate flag, are still believed to be at large.

From Irish Central

The US Anti-Defamation League has named the Celtic Cross as one of the racist symbols used around the world to promote hate in their online Hate Symbols Database.

The ADL believes that white supremacist versions of the Celtic Cross, otherwise known as Odin’s Cross, Sun Cross, or Wheel Cross, have become some of the most important and widely used symbols of white supremacists. The cross consists of a square cross interlocking with or surrounded by a circle.

So because some white supremacists use the Celtic cross, that means nobody else is allowed to use it without being guilty by association? If a white supremacist group started wearing Hello Kitty merchandise, would that mean that all the little Asian girls who like Hello Kitty, would suddenly be considered white supremacists as well?

The future of white supremacy.
The future of white supremacy.

According to the League’s database, a version of the Celtic Cross was used by Norwegian Nazis during the 1930s and 40s and a variety of white supremacist groups and movements took it as their own symbol of hate following World War II.

So they took a symbol of historical significance to their ethnic group, one with absolutely no legacy of being a symbol of hatred, and adopted it as a source of pride? So what, who the fuck cares? Should we go and knock over historical Celtic grave sites, because of this? Or can we instead just act like adults, accept the fact that these symbols have different historical meanings, and focus on more important issues, like actually trying to understand why racial tension exists, and what can be done to fix it? Of course, that will never happen, because the ADL has no interest in actually trying to solve the racism problem. If they did, they’d concede that while white racist are a problem that should be condemned, the race problem isn’t entirely the fault of white people. They would accept that other racial groups like Blacks, Arabs, and Hispanics are also responsible in their own ways. If they did that though, it would undermine their true goal… instilling whitey with white guilt, so his countries can be taken from him more easily.

They currently class the cross as a symbol used by neo-Nazis, racist skinheads, Ku Klux Klan members and many other forms of white supremacists. The Celtic Cross is also used as part of the logo of Stormfront, the oldest and largest white supremacist website in the world.

Stormfront was established by Don Black, a former grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan (a group which targeted Irish Catholics along with African-Americans and Jews) before he ironically established a hate site that appropriated a symbol generally associated with Ireland and Christianity as part of its main banner.

A quick search of the Stormfront forum reveals 84 separate discussions on the subject of the Celtic Cross with topics ranging from Celtic Cross t-shirt designs to the history of the Celtic Cross usage by white supremacists.

“I don’t think a lot of people associate the symbol [Celtic Cross] with negative connotations as they do with the swastika,” user DevilsThunder writes.

“Symbols like the sunwheel, runes, iron cross, etc. are much more acceptable now. I don’t get confronted at all wearing these symbols in public. If it was a swastika I would.”

And really, why should the Celtic cross have negative connotations? What negative acts have been committed under its banner. If a bunch of white supremacists want to wear t-shirts with it, who cares? It’s a nice symbol, with historical significance (of a good kind, not a bad kind). Should we prevent men from shaving their heads bald because of white power skinheads? Should we ban people from wearing jeans, if white supremacists decide that they like wearing jeans? Hey I know, lets just make having white skin a symbol of hate, seeing as so many white supremacists have white skin. Seriously, where is the line drawn?

“Do the other races know what the Cross could be a symbol of? I don’t know,” user RevDrRed comments in a discussion entitled: “Do most people know what the Celtic cross stands for?”

“They pay more attention to my confederate flag tag on my car than they do my crosses,” he added.

“The Celtic Cross is in my band’s logo and most people don’t have a clue what it means,” states user whitepowermetal in the same discussion.

The League notes, however, that the use of the Celtic Cross as a hate symbol should be taken on a case-by-case basis. As a prominent symbol of Irish culture, many use the Celtic Cross to portray love of their Irish heritage and history, not to promote hate.

@_@

They actually made a reasonable point. I’m…shocked actually.

The origins of the Celtic Cross date back to pre-Christian times, to a “sun cross” or a “wheel cross” used in ancient Europe. The “sun cross” differs from the Celtic cross as we most commonly see it today – all of the arms of the cross being the same length. When the symbol was adapted into Christianity, one of the arms was elongated to symbolize the shape of cross generally associated with the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

The League reports that it is most commonly the “sun cross” version of the Celtic Cross that is used by White Supremacists, although this, too, may not always be true. Many people of Irish birth and heritage remain unaware of the hateful ways in which this important part of Irish culture is used by others.

Well I’m aware and I honestly don’t care if they do. They can use it for all I care. The symbol doesn’t hurt anyone. It only has power to hurt, if you allow yourself to be offended by it.

“The Celtic Cross, as typically depicted, is a traditional Christian symbol used for religious purposes as well as to symbolize concepts like Irish pride,” the League’s web site explains.

“As such, it is a very common symbol and primarily used by non-extremists.”

“The overwhelming use of this version of the Celtic Cross is non-extremist and, in the absence of other hate symbols, does not denote white supremacy or racism.”

So if the overwhelming number of people who use it are not extremists, why should the purpose the extremists give it be allowed to define it? Talk about your non-issue. Just seems like the ADL was looking for yet another excuse to complain about whitey, and decided to latch onto this. Personally, I say keep it up. The more obnoxious and obvious you become in your attacks against whites in our own lands, the more people you’re going to piss off. I welcome their awakening.

Do you?

EDIT: I forgot to post this before, but I figured it was worth sharing. Here we have a screenshot from the comments section of the article. Some guy was trying to justify this reaction to the Celtic Cross and was called out on it by another commenter. Did he debate his argument logically? No of course not, he resorted to insults because he was completely incapable of justifying his position. Check it out.

Fantastic debating skills there Patrick.
Fantastic debating skills there Patrick.

Cop killed with own gun by “unarmed” black criminal.

“Da po-lice is racist. He wuz a gud boy. He dindu nuffin. He wuz goin’ to church every week. He wuz gettin’ his life back on track. Black lives matter”~ The kind of reaction we would have seen if the cop had actually managed to defend himself.

The prevailing narrative in the media every single time an “unarmed” black criminal is killed by cops, is that the cop killed them needlessly, due to some kind of irrational hatred they feel towards the colour of their skin. It has gotten to the point were even in cases where black cops are involved, such as the Freddie Gray case, the media still plays up the idea that it was racially motivated, cold blooded murder.

All six of these cops were apparently motivated to murder career drug dealer, Freddie Gray out of hatred for his skin colour.
All six of these cops were apparently motivated to murder career drug dealer, Freddie Gray out of hatred for his skin colour.

This of course is completely ridiculous. We’re actually expected to believe the insane assertion that in the modern, overly politically correct and tolerant world that we now live in, that there are countless people out there, who are driven to a blind homicidal rage when they encounter people with a non-white skin pigmentation. The narrative has gotten so ridiculous, that they’re now trying to claim that even other people with that same skin pigmentation, are just as liable to feel this rage, and commit cold blooded murder, if given the opportunity to do so. It absolutely boggles my mind that they’re able to tell these stories with a straight face, and people actually seem to believe it.

The lives of black criminals, rightfully put down in self defence matter. The lives of blacks killed by other black criminals don't however.
The lives of black criminals, rightfully put down in self defence matter. The lives of blacks killed by other black criminals don’t however.
No, but this also doesn't take into consideration that blacks also commit far more murders per capita than whites do.
No, black on black murder isn’t significantly worse than the white on white murder rate, but this also doesn’t take into consideration that blacks also commit far more murders per capita than whites do, meaning that blacks are killing and being killed at a far higher rate.

The problem with all this outrage directed towards cops who defend themselves using lethal force against these black criminals, is that it’s making them reluctant to do their job properly. We saw a perfect example of this in Baltimore following the Freddie Gray protests. Cops were reluctant to go in and enforce the law, for fear that they too could end up being on the wrong side of the Black Lives Matter movement. The result? The number of homicides quickly skyrocketed.

A

b

c

d

e

f

This of course included plenty of black deaths, but did this matter to the Black Live Matter movement? It sure doesn’t seem that way. In all their eagerness to cry racism because a bunch of black criminals were killed in encounters with law enforcement, they achieved nothing, but to allow other black criminals an opportunity to take the lives of other black people… criminal and innocent alike.

This reluctance and fear felt by cops isn’t limited to simply not bothering to enforce the law. There are cases were cops still try to do their job, but don’t do everything necessary to do it properly. When that happens, we get cases such as this one.

From WAFB

According to St. Landry Parish Sheriff Bobby Guidroz, three women were allegedly stabbed by a man who later shot a Sunset police officer. The sheriff said the incident started off as a possible domestic issue and quickly turned into “hell in a hand basket.” 

Two sisters of Grand Coteau Interim Mayor Shaterral Johnson were stabbed while trying to stop 35-year-old Harrison Lee Riley Jr., of Arnaudville, from stabbing his wife, Courtney Jolivette. Despite earlier miscommunication, one of the sisters, 40-year-old Shameka Johnson, and Officer Henry Nelson both died on the scene. 

51-year-old Nelson was responding to the scene of a stabbing on Anna Street when he was shot by Riley with his own gun. According to the sheriff, Riley had taken the gun from Nelson during a confrontation. 

I think it’s a very real possibility that based on the media stirring shit up the past few years, regarding cops attacking black criminals, that this cop may have been hesitant to use the force necessary to protect himself, for fear of the reaction he would get. As a result, the criminal was given an opening he never should have gotten, and was able to wrestle the cop’s gun away from, and use it against him. You see despite the ridiculous lies being told by the media, that somehow an unarmed criminal couldn’t possibly be a danger to armed cops, meaning that there’s no excuse for a cop to ever use lethal force to defend themselves, this story proves it completely wrong. That “unarmed” criminal was able to arm himself quick enough and murder that cop, a murder that could very easily have been prevented, if the cop had used his gun first.

As already pointed out in reference to the Freddie Gray story, the fact that the cop himself was black is irrelevant. The media still would have portrayed him as some kind of hate filled racist, murdering an innocent black criminal, for absolutely no reason. He could have potentially lost his job, but instead he lost his life. The question is, will the Black Lives Matter crowd be out protesting over this death, seeing as the officer himself was black?

Good news everyone. We can now cure racist babies of their racism.

The typical white baby is a born racist, just like this one here for example.
The typical white baby.
Or this one. Why are we so horrible?
Another typical white baby.

It seems that babies tend to express a preference for people who are of the same race as them. I would have assumed that seeing as babies are too young to actually think things through, that this behaviour would be the result of a hardwired, biological instinct. However, it turns out I was wrong. Those babies were actually thinking quite clearly, and were deliberately being racist, just for the sake of being evil. Luckily enough, science has found a way to cure them of their evil, and completely unnatural tendency towards racial bias.

From Yahoo News

As early as three months old, children can show racial bias towards women who are the same race as themselves.

My goodness, three months old you say? They’re only out of the womb three months, and already they’re planning to re-enslave the blacks, and commit a second holocaust, as evident by their bias towards women of the same race as the woman they know and trust best of all… their own mother. This is horribly distressing.

University of Delaware scientists claim to have found a technique which can reverse this unconscious bias.

Hmm I wonder which technique they use this time?

The Clockwork Orange method...
The Clockwork Orange method…
...Or the 1984 method?
…Or the 1984 method?
Nope, neither this time. Apparently this is the device they use instead. Looks almost as terrifying though.
Nope, neither this time. Apparently this is the device they use instead. Looks almost as terrifying though.

Paul Quinn of the University of Delaware found that, by nine months old, infants were less able to identify individuals of different races.

But he found that a simple exercise where infants were taught to identify faces with names could help to ‘reverse’ the trend.

“Little white racist baby, this is Tyrone”

4Sa04xo

“Tyrone is exactly the same as you, except evil people who look like yourself, oppress people who look like him for no reason. It is your sworn duty to feel ashamed of yourself forever because of the behaviour of people who look like you towards people who look like him. If you don’t feel that shame, you are a horrible person. Well, you’re already a horrible person, but in that situation, you would be even more horrible. Anyway, remember Tyrone’s face, and always remember that he is a victim, and therefore deserves more in life than you do”

‘Might these perceptual biases we see in infants be related to the social biases that we see in older kids, beginning at three or four years of age, and adults?,’ Quinn writes.

Probably.

‘And if they are, can we use a technique to reduce bias?

“The natural order is evil. We need to reprogram these children so they’ll fit into our ‘Brave New World’. oh btw, we’ve always been at war with Eastasia.”

‘As we tried to answer this question, we hit on the idea that if the perceptual and social biases are linked, we might be able to reduce the social bias by perceptual means.’

“Natural instincts are wrong. People need to think exactly the way we tell them to think. That will make society much better. And if they don’t start thinking the way we want them to…”

CambodiaKillingField

America’s “race problem” summarised in three short videos.

How can there be any doubt now? Clearly white people are the ones causing all the racial problems in America, what with their uncontrolled and unprovoked violent attacks towards poor, defenseless black people. Just look at how those cowardly whites either use sucker punches, or attack individuals as part of a group of 4 or 5. Note as well how all those white people keep stomping on the heads of their black victims, long after they’re already unconscious, without worrying about the possibility that they may kill them in the process.

Now lets compare what happens in a fair one on one fight between a black American and a white American. As we can clearly see here, in a fair fight, the black guy kicks the white guy’s ass, but rather than continuing to beat on him while he’s down (like a white guy would do to a black guy), he walks away, once he has proven his point.

And here we see another video of a fair fight, in which the black guy wins and walks away peacefully.

And another one.

Clearly those white liberals and Jews who live in 95+% white neighbourhoods, and who run the media (and therefore dictate how the rest of us should think), are completely right in their assessment that white people are the ones causing all the problems.

I also think that based on the precedent from the videos above, that it’s pretty obvious that the current narrative we’re fed by the media about innocent unarmed blacks being killed by racist cops for no reason, is definitely 100% accurate. Those cops couldn’t possibly have been defending themselves against violence. Clearly, seeing the non-white skin pigmentation of their victims, was like a red rag to a bull, and it filled them with a blind rage, that caused them to murder those innocent blacks in cold blood for absolutely no reason.

Even black cops seem to become racist towards blacks for some reason. Obviously this extreme homicidal racism which causes them to risk their careers, their reputations, and even their lives, makes far more sense than the idea that they were actually defending themselves. The videos above prove that. The mainstream media would never dream of lying to us when they write about how blacks are the victims, and whites are always the cause of all the racism in America. No, clearly they would never dream of lying at all.

*EDIT~ 24th October 2016*

All but one of the videos in this article have since been deleted. As it probably won’t be so obvious now without them, I’ll just come out and say it. I was being sarcastic.

A small sample of what we’re up against.

I really have been such a horrible person. While I’m spending all this time focusing on issues that I consider to be important, I have failed to recognise the true problems of the world. All those evil white, heterosexual, men, who go around oppressing people for no reason. Well, no more. I am here to share a few things that I’ve learned about, in the hopes that together we can rise up and stop these hate filled monsters from continuing to oppress everyone else.

Credit goes to the Tumblrinaction reddit board for helping to educate me on the real issues facing us. Jokes aside, this should give you an idea just how far society has fallen, if these are the sort of things that people consider to be the most serious issues facing us right now. Now, there’s a very real chance that some of these people are just trolls messing around but unfortunately, the genuine extremists have gone so far at this point that it’s actually impossible to tell the difference between those who are serious and those who are not.

Literally advocating "Animal Farm". Orwell, you were like Nostradamus.
Literally advocating “Animal Farm”. Orwell, you were like Nostradamus.
"We don't want men telling women how to behave. however, we do want to tell them how to behave ourselves" ~ Feminists
“We don’t want men telling women how to behave. however, we do want to tell them how to behave ourselves” ~ Feminists
Sure men who are accused of rape falsely have their lives ruined, and genuine victims of rape have their experiences trivialised,  but there's absolutely no consequences whatsoever.
Sure men who are accused of rape falsely have their lives ruined, and genuine victims of rape have their experiences trivialised, but there’s absolutely no consequences whatsoever.
"But really, we just want equality"
“But really, we just want equality”
A fantastic idea. Of course, if you're going to be an animal, you should be treated as one. If I want to eat you, keep you as a pet, or put you in a zoo, then tough. Human rights are for humans only.
A fantastic idea. Of course, if you’re going to be an animal, you should be treated as one. If I want to eat you, keep you as a pet, or put you in a zoo, then tough. Human rights are for humans only.
Please do us all a favour and actually peel off your skin for real. If you bleed to death in the process,   even better.
Please do us all a favour and actually peel off your skin for real. If you bleed to death in the process, even better.
Those white people in Zimbabwe and South Africa don't exist apparently.
Those white people in Zimbabwe and South Africa don’t exist apparently. Neither did those white girls who were groomed and molested in England by those Muslims.
Brilliant idea. That would just leave us with the concept of "Sex"... an objective physical reality that can't be disputed like your bullshit social construct nonsense about gender.
Brilliant idea. That would just leave us with the concept of “Sex”… an objective physical reality that can’t be disputed like your bullshit social construct nonsense about gender.
Why isn't food free? Why isn't shelter free? Why isn't clothing free? Why isn't toothpaste free? Why are you such an idiot?
Why isn’t food free? Why isn’t shelter free? Why isn’t clothing free? Why isn’t toothpaste free? Why are you such an idiot?
Would that make a gay or lesbian person who wouldn't date a straight person of the opposite sex "heterophobic" then?
Would that make a gay or lesbian person who wouldn’t date a straight person of the opposite sex “heterophobic” then?
I never knew that little girls required surgery and hormone supplements to become women. I always assumed it was a natural phenomenon.
I never knew that little girls required Frankenstein like surgery and hormone supplements to become women. I always assumed it was a natural phenomenon.
Brilliant logic. Then when all the blacks who actually commit the most gun crimes are the only ones armed, white Americans will be easy pickings for slaughter by them.
Brilliant logic. Then when all the blacks who actually commit the most gun crimes are the only ones armed, white Americans will be easy pickings for slaughter by them.
YES, take that you stupid tumblrina.
YES, take that you stupid tumblrina.
Well for a start, inventing most of the useful inventions in the world, including the computer, the internet, and the fucking language you're using to cry about white people.
Well for a start, inventing most of the useful inventions in the world, including the computer, the internet, and the fucking language you’re using to cry about white people.
I'm sure its parents are so proud of it.
I’m sure its parents are so proud of it.
Yes it's so true. White people have no culture. All that history we learned about great white inventors, authors, artists, musicians, playwrites, philosophers, artists, etc. is a lie. They were all actually Black/Arab/Asian, who were kidnapped by evil white slavers and taken to Europe against their will.
Yes it’s so true. White people have no culture. All that history we learned about great white inventors, authors, artists, musicians, playwrites, philosophers, artists, etc. is a lie. They were all actually Black/Arab/Asian, who were kidnapped by evil white slavers and taken to Europe against their will.
Yes, I'm sure he told them in the job interview that he likes kiddy sex, and they just ignored it because of his being a white male. Conveniently enough, uou don't touch on his actual privilege.
Yes, I’m sure he told them in the job interview that he likes kiddy sex, and they just ignored it because of his being a white male. Conveniently enough, you don’t touch on his actual privilege.
The answer is very obvious. Otherkin don't actually exist. Those who claim to be, are just a bunch of attention seeking weirdos taking part in a fad that older people are too old to have been a part of.
The answer is very obvious. Otherkin don’t actually exist. Those who claim to be, are just a bunch of attention seeking weirdos taking part in a fad that older people are too old to have been a part of.
"I'm too special to have the words he or she used to refer to me. I demand you use these ridiculous words that I invented to refer to me, even though the only time people actually use pronouns to refer to people, is when talking to a third party about that person. Please give me attention. Please treat me as someone special"
“I’m too special to have the words he or she used to refer to me. I demand you use these ridiculous words that I invented to refer to me, even though the only time people actually use pronouns to refer to people, is when talking to a third party about that person. Please give me attention. Please treat me as someone special”
We'll see how much you want to be a cat when we take you to get spayed you pathetic attention whore.
We’ll see how much you want to be a cat when we take you to get spayed you pathetic attention whore.
Whites built and ran the most prosperous country on the entire continent (with the possible exception of Rhodesia which was also run by whites). Sure, whites should leave and allow it to become like every other black run country in the world. Let nature take its course.
Whites built and ran the most prosperous country on the entire continent (with the possible exception of Rhodesia which was also run by whites). Sure, whites should leave and allow it to become like every other black run country in the world. Let nature take its course.
I'd actually be quite happy to be educated, if you people actually cited genuine events or statistics as opposed to just crying about your "feels".
I’d actually be quite happy to be educated, if you people actually cited genuine events or statistics as opposed to just crying about your “feels”.
Sorry ladies, I guess I'm not the one.
Sorry ladies, I guess I’m not the one.
Guess I'm transphobic then. Wow... I really don't care.
Guess I’m transphobic then. Wow… I really don’t care.
"No man will touch me, so nobody else is allowed to have sex either"
“No man will touch me, so nobody else is allowed to have sex either”
"I'm not trying to judge...but I actually am. How dare you black women date white men when I don't approve of that?  However black men, can still date white women if they want."
“I’m not trying to judge…but I actually am. How dare you black women date white men when I don’t approve of that? However black men, can still date white women if they want.”
We have as much right to refuse sex as a woman has to refuse to have sex with us.
We have as much right to refuse sex as a woman has to refuse to have sex with us.
Has enough money to own a vacation home. Still tries to play the oppressed victim because she has to pay a bit more money to afford a bath tub big enough for her to fit into.
Has enough money to own a vacation home. Still tries to play the oppressed victim because she has to pay a bit more money to afford a bath tub big enough for her to fit into.

All this is just a small example. There are literally thousands of people like this in the world, who seem to think that they’re the biggest victims on the planet. What the fuck are these people going to do when everything goes to hell for real? They’re going to be nothing but a drain on the rest of us. We can’t rely on them to help us fix things if society ever does collapse. That’s why I propose that if ever things do go to hell (for example, the Muslim extremists try to take over our countries from the inside) that we let them fend for themselves, while those of us who actually care about fixing society fight off the threat separately. Afterall, they obviously hate us, so why should we bother taking care of them? They made their choice to be perpetual victims and crybabies instead of productive members of society, and they should live with the consequences of that choice.

The future facing us all unless we wake up.

Here we have a two minute video, where our enemies make it quite clear what they intend to do to us.

You see, it doesn’t matter how much we grovel before them. It doesn’t matter how much money we throw at them. It doesn’t matter how much we raise the diversity quotas in employment and educational opportunities, which give them unfair advantages over more qualified whites in our own countries. None of this will ever be enough to satisfy them.

The media is constantly telling them how evil we are. The media is constantly holding us responsible for their failures. The media is constantly playing up violent crimes committed against them by us, while downplaying the significantly higher amount of crimes they commit against us. History is distorted in such a way as to suggest that all we ever did was commit acts of aggression and evil against them. Anything good we ever did (and continue to do) is glossed over. White people invented most of the great inventions in the world? White people created the most progressive societies in the world? White people risked their lives travelling to Africa to fight ebola? Who cares about all that?

There’s a very real agenda against us. And that agenda is white genocide. How much more obvious does it have to be?

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Article 3

The following acts shall be punishable:

  • (a) Genocide;
  • (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
  • (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
  • (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
  • (e) Complicity in genocide.

That’s exactly what they are doing. They are outright publicly inciting genocide against the white race in breach of article 3 of the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. But is anything said about it? No, of course not, because the treacherous elites in our nations are complicit in it, and the vast majority of dumb masses are too distracted by their X-Factor, Soap Operas, and consumerism to pay attention to such things. The only way they know how to think is whatever the mainstream media tells them to think, and it’s quite clear to anyone who pays attention to the mainstream media, that they are complicit in the ongoing genocide and replacement of our people in our own countries.

I’m not too worried that things will go to hell in my lifetime. However, that’s not the point. How can I, in good conscience live my life and eventually pass away peacefully, knowing the suffering and danger my descendants will face? Anyone who knows what’s happening, and isn’t willing to speak out is a disgrace. At best, you’re a coward. At worst, you’re a collaborator with those working to destroy your own people. I only hope that more and more people will wake up and speak out.

We don’t need to become hardcore racists in retaliation. We can still try to have a good relationship and friendship with people of other races. I’m simply saying that we need to get over our self loathing and white guilt, and stand up for our own interests again. We need to put the interests of our own people in our own nations ahead of those who want to destroy us. Self-preservation, the most basic instinct of any living organism. Is that really such a radical idea nowadays?

It could finally be happening: Golden Dawn to form Greek government.

After watching Alexis fail spectacularly as Greek Prime Minister, people were shocked when he had the integrity to do the decent thing, and resign his position, after just 8 months in power. This throws the already chaotic Greek state into further chaos. What options are left for the people to choose from after going from failure, to failure, to failure?

Well… there is one option left that hasn’t yet been tried, and it looks as if the desperate Greek people now have no other choice.

golden-dawn1

golden-dawn-nazi-salute1024x694

Golden Dawn party members

GREECE-RACISM-GOLDEN-DAWN

From Sputnik News

A Greek lawmaker told Sputnik that Golden Dawn party will be given a mandate to form the government.

 MOSCOW (Sputnik) — The third party to be granted a mandate to form a new Greek government will be the far-right Golden Dawn, MP from the New Democracy Party, Makis Voridis, told Sputnik on Friday.

“The third party to receive a proposal to create a government will be the Golden Dawn,” Voridis who is a former Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Networks, said. 

“I do not think that New Democracy will manage to create a new government, it will not manage to form a parliamentarian majority,” Voridis, who is a former Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Networks, said.

Main opposition New Democracy Party will refuse to form coalition with the left-wing SYRIZA party in case it wins the snap parliamentary elections.   

“SYRIZA, the party of the resigned Prime minister, will not participate in any kind of discussion around creating a coalition right now. Without their votes, with actually now are 118, it is practically impossible to form any kind of government,” Voridis stressed.

Earlier on Friday, Greek President Prokopis Pavlopoulos granted the leader of Greece’s official opposition and head of the center-right New Democracy party Vangelis Meimarakis a mandate to form a new government.

Under the Greek Constitution, Meimarakis has three days to determine if his party can create a viable government before a caretaker regime is put in place.

Golden Dawn is a radical right party, whose 69 members have been accused of creating and running a criminal organization.

This is just history repeating itself. In the early 1930s, Germany was in economic chaos, and was easily the most impoverished nation in Europe. There were constant battles for supremacy between the far left and the far right, all while the average German suffered greatly due to Germany’s crippling international debts. In early 1933, after having exhausted so many other options, it was decided that a coalition government should be set up under the leadership of some guy with a mustache, who held some very “extreme” ideologies, in the hopes of bringing stability to the chaos.

The guy who led that coalition.
The guy who led that coalition.

And you know what happened? In many ways, he did bring stability. Just Google “German economic recovery 1930s” to read up about it. I’m not posting any links here, because every link I do see, seems to be biased in some way. Some try to downplay the economic recovery, or make excuses for it. Others, talk it up as if Hitler was a saint, and the greatest economic genius who ever lived. Rather than posting a link to any of these views, I’d prefer to encourage others to read up on it themselves and form their own opinions on what happened.

Anyway, I’ll just leave it at that. I just thought it was very interesting to see what’s going on in Greece at the moment. I can guarantee that a lot of very powerful people in international politics, media, and banking are not happy about this development. I’m sure if this actually goes ahead, we’ll be reading a lot of stories about how evil the Greeks are, and how they need to be invaded, in order to restore “democracy” or “human rights” or something to that effect. The question is, what happens if they actually succeed in turning Greece around? What will that mean for the rest of Europe? Very interesting times ahead.

Alex Jones gets utterly destroyed by Dr. David Duke.

One of the biggest problems about trying to discuss the truth about what is going on in the world, is the negative image that those who claim to speak the truth have. The average person looks at “conspiracy theorists” as a bunch of whacky, tinfoil-hat wearing, lunatics, shouting from the rooftops about how the world is secretly controlled by reptilian creatures in human form. One of the most well known and influential examples of these nutty conspiracy theorist types is Alex Jones.

Alex Jones, intercepting messages from the secret moon Nazis who have controlled the world since the end of WW2.
Alex Jones, seen here intercepting messages from the secret moon Nazis who have controlled the world since the end of WW2.

Over the years, Alex Jones has exposed the “truth” about how Hollywood is secretly controlled by Arabs (ignoring the fact that Hollywood is very openly run by Jews), how vaccinations contain cancer viruses, how Nazis secretly run the world (again, ignoring the very obvious amount of powerful Jews in the world), among other things. Essentially, Alex Jones comes off as a complete lunatic, who sane people can point at and say “That’s the truth movement? Why should I take someone like that seriously?”

And really, why should they take someone like him seriously? Just look at this clip for example, to get an insight into how he operates.

Jones going on one of his many insane rants.

The problem however is for many people who are beginning to awaken to the fact that the world isn’t right, Alex Jones serves as their “gateway drug” to the truth movement. Therefore, a lot of well intentioned people, who genuinely do want to learn the truth are often drawn to him, and are misled to believe that his insane (and most likely drug and alcohol fueled) ravings, are in fact the real deal. Others regrettably, find his rants off-putting and so, end up dismissing the truth movement as a whole, as bullshit. However, a small amount of people start seeing through him, and realise that he is in fact controlled opposition, set up by the true elites to discredit the truth movement as a whole.

“I most certainly am NOT controlled opposition. I am fully opposed to those mysterious globalists, who I’ll never actually name. Now buy my penis enlarging snake oil”

So who are these true elites? Well, I’ve touched upon it once or twice in the past, but I’ve never gone into too much detail because decades of propaganda have conditioned people to feel uncomfortable and dismissive whenever they are mentioned, and even I have felt a natural discomfort bringing it up because of my own conditioning. You see it’s very easy for me to discuss the Muslim problem, and people are smart enough to know that I don’t mean all Muslims, just the ones who are causing problems. It’s very easy to talk about the problems that African migrants cause, or the problems that black thugs in America cause, and people are smart enough to know that I’m not talking about all black people. However, whenever there is a mention of this particular group, people are inclined to think that the person mentioning them has a vendetta against all of them, and is a maniac who wants to wipe them all out. I am of course referring to…

The Jews
The Jews

I think it’s important to point out that I don’t believe in some grand international Jewish conspiracy to rule the world, nor do I believe that every single Jew is actively involved in what’s happening. Of course there are innocent Jews, just like there are innocent Muslims. However, just like there’s an obviously disproportionate amount of Muslim terrorists and rapists in Western societies, there is an obviously disproportionate amount of Jewish figures in leading positions in international banking, in control of the mainstream media, and fighting the war against “white privilege”  while pretending to be white, etc. Therefore, I don’t see any problem with pointing these facts out, anymore than anything else that I’ve spoken about on here. It’s just simply an indisputable reality, that there is a hostile Jewish elite in control of the world, who actively promote Jewish interests ahead of those of the white majorities in white countries.

This is what they tend to do when people start speaking out against them. They're the ones most vocal about pushing for so called
This is what they tend to do when people start speaking out against them. They’re the ones most vocal about pushing for so called “hate speech” laws.

Alex Jones however, despite supposedly being in the truth movement, bravely speaking out against the “globalists” never seems to mention the overwhelming number of Jews in positions of power, or heavily involved in the actions that he claims to speak out against. Instead, he treats them as if they’re some kind of faceless, unidentifiable entity, who nobody, even he with all his alleged research, is able to see. The fact that his wife is a Jew, and most of his sponsors are Jews has led many people to suggest that he does so deliberately, for fear of biting the hand that feeds him. This has led many people in the truth movement to harass him for years, referring to him as a shill for the Jews, telling him that he’s controlled opposition,  and constantly bringing up that his wife is a Jew.

“Hello, is this the Alex Jones show? JEW WIFE!!! JEW SPONSORS!!!”
The years of trying to hide the truth while claiming to speak it are taking their toll on what's left of the man's sanity.
The years of trying to hide the truth while claiming to speak it are taking their toll on what’s left of the man’s sanity.

Recently, the trolls managed to push Jones to make quite possibly the biggest mistake of his career. They convinced him to invite Dr. David Duke onto his show for a debate. David Duke, unlike Alex Jones is part of the actual truth movement. This is so very obvious, just from how the mainstream media treats them both. Jones is given free reign to promote his insane theories by the media. Sure, he’s treated as a laughing stock, but the fact that he’s allowed on at all proves that it serves a purpose. Because of how insane and outlandish he appears, he makes the truth movement as a whole look ridiculous…exactly what the hostile “globalist elites” that he claims to be against want.

No this isn't a photoshop. He actually did dress like this before. Why would anyone worry about the
No this isn’t a photoshop. He actually did dress like this before. Why would anyone worry about the “truths” someone like this exposes.

David Duke on the other hand is treated with nothing but disdain by the mainstream media both on the left and on the right. Just look at those two videos. In both cases, the left leaning CNN, and the right leaning Fox News, the interviewers speak over, insult and demean Duke, anytime he tries to make a point. Regardless of how you feel about his message, the fact that the media doesn’t even try to argue his points, instead choosing to attack him personally, while he behaves in a polite and civil manner, only serves to generate sympathy for him, because it suggests that they fear what he is saying for some reason.

So anyway, as I was saying, Alex Jones was pushed by trolls into inviting David Duke onto his show, where they had a two hour discussion. Although I don’t expect people to sit there for two hours watching the whole video, I will post it anyway just in case they do. I’d certainly recommend reading the comments at least, because some of them are absolute gold.

The whole thing is just amazing to see. The normally unhinged Jones, is actually surprisingly respectful and deferential to Duke, allowing him plenty of time to make his points. It’s as if he knew damn well that he was out of his league dealing with Duke, someone who actually has done his research on these topics, and actually knows what he’s talking about. There are a few points where he does interrupt, as well as making jokes about Duke’s past as a KKK leader (which is true, though Duke claims he left in 1980 because he didn’t condone their use of violence to promote their ideology). However, for the most part, Jones was actually a better host than any mainstream figure ever has been towards Duke.

The best part of the interview comes at 1:38:20, when Jones decides to bring in his behind the scenes Jewish boss (he admits the Jew is his boss at 1:45:25) to argue with Duke. Literally, in order to prove that Jews don’t control everything, he reveals the Jew who controls his own show. It’s just incredible, you can’t make this stuff up.

“Pay no attention to that Jew behind the curtain. The great Jones has spoken”

The whole interview was so devastating, that Jones only uploaded an edited and significantly shortened video of the debate (the one I linked to was a recording uploaded by someone else)… and even that edited one was later taken down because it still couldn’t make David Duke look bad. This is fantastic, and I’m excited to see what this will lead to. As I said, a lot of people looking to get into the truth movement start off with Alex Jones (he has a fanbase in the millions). This is the kind of fanbase that are already in the right mindset to be won over by the real truth movement. I wonder, did many of Jones’s loyal followers watch this debate all the way through, and realise that Duke was making a hell of a lot more sense than Jones ever has? I certainly hope so. We could see more people understanding what’s happening, and the more who understand, the closer we get to resolving it.

Maybe we’ll see something like this happen again, if all his followers leave for the real truth movement.

I knew it would happen sooner or later.

As Western society sinks further and further into the depths of depravity, it can hardly be considered surprising to see something like this being pushed as the next “civil rights frontier”. I really think we’re getting closer and closer to the inevitable collapse.

The day of the mass awakening and rebellion against what's happening can't come quick enough.
The day of the mass awakening and rebellion against what’s happening, can’t come quick enough.

I don’t really feel like doing the usual thing were I respond to the article piece by piece. I’m so disgusted and saddened by seeing something like this, that I really just don’t have the heart to respond to it like I normally would. I certainly can’t find any humour in a topic like this. Quite frankly, I think it’s an absolute disgrace. The link to the article is there, if people want to read it for themselves. Comments are unavailable conveniently enough (hmm, I wonder why).

Why has it gotten this far? I knew that people would be trying to lobby for paedophile liberation eventually, but I didn’t think it would be this soon. I assumed that polygamy, bestiality, and necrophilia (not that I myself condone those things) would be promoted for legalisation and understanding beforehand (seeing as I figured most people would have less concerns about animals, corpses, or multiple consenting adults, than children, and therefore be more likely to accept it).

The fact that they’re trying to push something like this already, is highly disturbing to me. Has the world gotten so sick and depraved, that they actually feel confident enough to speak about something like this openly? I really hope this concept doesn’t actually begin to gather steam. In the pathetic overly tolerant world that we live in today, plenty of know-it-all do-gooder morons, would happily get on board, just to show everyone how progressive they are.

Of course, we can always count on a Swede to support such insanity.