Last November I wrote a post about how America was apparently planting some of their own people in Syria, to use as human shields against Russia’s massive success in bombing America’s “moderate terrorists” (AKA, ISIS allies) into oblivion. Their hope seemed to be that Russia and Syria wouldn’t dare to bomb areas with American people, for fear of provoking a massive backlash, possibly even giving America the justification to declare war on Russia in retaliation. The bitch from hell (no not Merkel, the other one who is running for US President) even suggested the insane idea of implementing a “no-fly zone” in Syria, to shoot down Russian planes if necessary. Well here we are, many months later and the treats have resurfaced. America is claiming they will use “any force necessary” to protect their people in Syria from Russian and Syrian bombing.
The Pentagon has warned Syria and Russia that the US is ready to shoot down their planes, which Washington claims threaten American advisers in northern Syria.
America is literally threatening Syria and their ally over flying their own planes in their own airspace. These American Advisers shouldn’t even be in Syria. The legal government of the country, which is run by Assad, did not invite America into their country, so they have no right to be there. America claims that they are there because they are trying to stop ISIS (which is the same thing the Syrian Government and Russia actually are trying to do), so they should either be working side by side with them to accomplish this task, or they should get out of the way and allow them to do this without interference.
The warning came after US fighter jets tried to engage Syrian Arab Air Force aircraft in Syria last week, but the showdown was avoided as government planes left before the Americans arrived.
Pentagon spokesman Captain Jeff Davis claimed on Friday the US fighters attempted to intercept the Syrian planes to protect American advisers – a term the US military often uses for its Special Operations Forces – working with Kurdish forces after the Syrian government jets bombed the area.
Again, what right do these US fighter jets have to be in Syria? As far as I can tell, they haven’t officially declared war against Syria (and even if they did, such a war would be illegal under international law anyway) and they haven’t been given permission by the Syrian government to be in Syria. Therefore, they shouldn’t be there.
On Monday, another Pentagon spokesman, Peter Cook, said, “We would continue to advise the Syrian regime to steer clear of those areas.”
“Syrian forces, stay out of these areas that are legally within your own territory. We demand this.”
“We are going to defend our people on the ground, and do what we need to defend them,” Cook told reporters.
If you want to defend them, might I suggest evacuating them, seeing as they have no legal right to be there?
“It’s not a no-fly zone,” he said, adding that “the Syrian regime would be wise to avoid areas where coalition forces have been operating.”
And you would be wise to mind your own fucking business and pull out of a country you have no legal right to be in. Let Syria and their allies deal with Syrian problems.
When asked about Russia, Cook said the US would also do the same with Russian jets, which have been striking Daesh targets in Syria at the country’s request since last year.
“If they threaten US forces, we always have the right to defend our forces,” Cook said.
THOSE FUCKING US FORCES SHOULDN’T EVEN BE THERE!!!!
Oh my God, this whole narrative is so fucking stupid. Let me just repeat it again so it all sinks in. Assad is the legal sovereign ruler of Syria. ISIS (who the US claims to oppose) has declared war against Assad. This has led to the Syrian civil war. Assad, the legal ruler of Syria appealed to his ally Russia for assistance in dealing with the threat. Therefore, russia is allowed to be there legally. Assad did not invite America into the country. Therefore, America shouldn’t be there.
Russia launched its air offensive in Syria in September 2015. According to analysts, the campaign has so far broken the backbone of Daesh and other militants there, and has provided the Syrian government with an opportunity to defeat the foreign-sponsored terrorist onslaught.
Funny isn’t it how Russia accomplished more in a few months than America accomplished in the full previous year which was supposedly spent “fighting ISIS”? This suggests one of two possible scenarios.
- Russia is a greater military power than America now (in which case, it would be foolish for America to antagonise them too much).
- America wasn’t trying really hard to fight ISIS at all. They were in the country for other, more sinister motives, and were only pretending to be against ISIS the entire time when in reality, they were working to topple the Assad regime.
I’m leaning more toward the latter explanation myself. The fact that America has outright admitted to “training and arming Syrian rebels” (who although not necessarily members of ISIS, tend to work with them against their common enemy Assad), and has made it clear that Assad needs to go, suggests to me that they weren’t really all that keen in stopping ISIS.
After all, if they really cared about stopping them so badly, surely they would have had the might to do so, and even if they didn’t, then surely they would support the success that Russia is having against them. Instead however, they stick to their claim that there is actually a third group involved in the Syrian civil war. Some kind of “pro democracy, moderate terrorists”, who are fighting against both the Assad regime and ISIS. They claim that they support this third group, and are against Russia because Russia makes no distinction between ISIS and “the moderates” when bombing opposition troops. This is despite the fact that there is no evidence to suggest these “moderates” even exist.
The US and some of its Arab allies began their campaign in Syria in September 2014 without any authorization from Damascus or a UN mandate.
Like I said. They aren’t there legally.
Since then, they have been carrying out airstrikes in the war-torn country, but their air raids have done little to stop the Takfiri group’s advances there.
And yet Russia’s airstrikes have been quite successful, because unlike America, Russia isn’t just bombing random spots in the desert. Russia is actually taking the fight to the terrorists. America is just pretending to fight them, while in actuality, working to topple the Assad regime instead.
Davis said Friday that two Syrian SU-24 attack planes attacked Kurdish forces undergoing training with US Special Operations troops around the northeastern city of Hasakah, but they had left by the time the American jets arrived.
In response, the General Command of the Syrian Arab Army said later in the day that Kurdish forces were “attacking state institutions, stealing oil and cotton, obstructing exams, kidnapping unarmed civilians and spreading chaos and instability.”
“Just a bunch of nice, peaceful, moderate rebels, who are looking to implement democracy.”
Since March 2011, Syria has been gripped by a foreign-backed militancy. Daesh terrorists still control parts of Syria and Iraq.
By foreign backed they mean it isn’t really a “Syrian civil war” as such. It’s actually a bunch of foreign mercenaries which are supported by the US and its allies.
So there you have it. The US is literally threatening to declare war on Russia (which would literally be World War 3 if it where to happen), in order to protect a bunch of terrorists operating in a country which the US has no right to be in, in the first place. Just remember this information if the war ever does actually happen. There will undoubtedly be a lot of propaganda if it does happen, blaming Russia, as if they were the aggressors and instigators of the war. It is important that people understand who the bad guys really are when the time comes.
I just realised that this story is from an Iranian source. I understand that many people might not see Iran as a credible source because of their obvious mutual hatred with America. Therefore, I’ve decided to post links to other articles which also discuss this story, below. It’s actually quite hard to find a lot of sources for it. I’m guessing most of the biased mainstream media wants to bury the truth.
Morning News USA (Different article than above)
Daily Star (This one tries to twist it more in America’s favour)