Four teenagers tortured a 16-year-old boy with a hot iron before pouring lemon juice onto his burns and sexually assaulting him.
Oh those whacky “teenagers”, and their hilarious, teenage, hijinx. What’s the big deal here? You were young once, right? Don’t you remember your own harmless teenage pranks, which involved brutally torturing and gang-raping people?
You’re telling me that you didn’t behave like that, when you were a teenager?
The victim suffered horrific injuries after being lured to a house in the Werneth area of Oldham where he was tied up with tape around his mouth, hands and feet.
Remind me once again, why these animals were brought into Europe to live among us civilised people in the first place? I keep hearing that their presence benefits our societies somehow, though I’ve never actually heard what those benefits are and even if I were to hear them, I somehow doubt that these alleged benefits would outweigh the problems that they cause for us.
He was repeatedly punched and kicked, and scissors were used to cut his hair.
This is a war, and these “teens” see themselves as part of a conquering army, and see every single indigenous white European as a potential target that needs to destroyed. They won’t show mercy on any of us.
Let me make it quite clear, this attack was racially motivated.
His attackers then stripped him of his clothing and took a knife to his back.
After that, they used a hot iron to burn him on his buttocks, back and stomach and poured salt and lemon juice onto the burns.
But this is nothing to get outraged over of course. The real victims are the “innocent Muslims”, who have to deal with horrible “hate crimes” such as hearing Donald Trump say mean words about them, or having pigs heads dumped outside their schools.
Eventually, after several hours of torture and being sexually assaulted, the victim was finally able to leave the house.
On Thursday, four of his five attackers were put behind bars for the sickening attack which happened in October last year.
Shohaib Khan, 17, of Grange Avenue, Oldham, was sentenced to six years and six months in prison.
Sufyan Yaqub, 16, of Park Road, who lured the victim to the house, and Adam Hussain, 16, of Olivers Court, were both handed four year sentences.
All three pleaded guilty to blackmail, false imprisonment, wounding with intent and ABH.
Ahsan Khan, 15, of Cornwall Street, initially pleaded not guilty but after a two week trial was found guilty of blackmail, false imprisonment, wounding with intent, ABH, theft and causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent. He was sentenced to five years in prison.
A 17-year-old boy also pleaded guilty to a section 47 assault and was sentenced to a 12 month supervision programme with night-time curfew.
Absolutely pathetic sentences. And you can be sure they won’t even serve the full length of them anyway. They’ll all be out after having served half the time, for “good behaviour”. If we lived in saner times, they’d never see the outside of prison again. Well actually, if we lived in saner times, they never would have been allowed to live in Britain in the first place, so their wouldn’t really be an issue. Instead, they’d be living back in whichever Islamist hellhole their parents came from, and they probably would have been executed years ago by the authorities there for some crime they committed.
Detective Inspector Paul Walker said the victim will be haunted by the sickening attack for the rest of his life.
He said: “This was a sickening and prolonged attack on a young boy which left him so shaken and terrified that he didn’t even want to tell his parents what had happened.
“The emotional scars from this shocking attack will haunt him for the rest of his life and I could not even begin to imagine the agony and suffering that he endured.
Yeah, no shit, and his suffering is entirely the fault of the people behind Britain’s immigration policies. If they didn’t allow primitive savages from a hostile and incompatible, alien culture, to live in Britain, this never would have happened.
“Thankfully, his attackers have now been sentenced but this can never fully repair the damage that this barbaric incident has done.
As I’ve said, their sentences are pathetic in light of what they did. This was not some mistake they made in the heat of the moment. This was a calculated, deliberate, brutal, and sadistic attack. These vermin are mentally defective and should never be allowed to roam free again. I can 100% guarantee that they’ll only end up hurting (or worse) someone else, as soon as they’re free again.
“I want to pay tribute to the victim and his family for having the bravery to come forward and give evidence that has helped us catch and convict the people that have inflicted this upon him.”
Law and order is starting to break down in Sweden. If things keep going the way they’re going, Sweden will soon resemble your average third world hellhole. And they only have themselves to blame. They were an amazing country once, but they chose to fuck it all up by importing millions of primitive and violent savages to live among them, for absolutely no reason, and now they’re paying the price for their stupidity. Violence, mass rapes, drug dealing, a massive drain on taxes. Is this really what we want for the rest of Europe?
The inflow of asylum seekers in Sweden, a country with one of the most liberal laws towards refugees, is putting an increasing strain on the country’s police. There are now reportedly 55 areas in the country, where the law is not fully upheld.
Dubbed “no-go zones” in some media reports, there are now 55 areas in Swedish cities, where the police have significant problems in tackling crime. They are divided into three categories depending on how significant the risk to officers working there is.
Nobody could have possibly seen anything like this occurring. There’s no way that anyone could have possibly predicted that filling your country with millions of hostile and incompatible people would cause problems. Well, “racists”, “white supremacists”, “Islamophobes”, and “Neo-Nazis” did see it coming, but their opinions don’t count, because they only made these predictions originally (which coincidentally happened to be spot on), because they hate their skin colour.
Q-Why did they make these predictions about the “refugees”?
A-Because they’re evil racists who just hate the refugees for their skin colour.
Q-But how do we know they’re just evil racists who hate them for their skin colour?
A- Because they made these racist predictions about them.
Q- But why did they make these predictions?
A-Because they’re evil racists who just hate the refugees for their skin colour.
Q-But how do we know they’re just evil racists who hate them for their skin colour?
A- Because they made these racist predictions about them.
*this cycle continues forever*
That’s the kind of logic we’re dealing with here. Anybody who just uses common sense and objective reasoning when considering the effects these migrants are having on Europe, is automatically dismissed as being racist, when the reality is that most of us are just genuinely concerned people who fear for our futures. It doesn’t matter though that what we predicted is actually coming true, because as far as they’re concerned, we all had ulterior motives when we made our predictions and were just pretending to be concerned that what is happening right now, would happen .
The number has risen from 50 in February, when the police last gave a comprehensive report on the issue, and last week, when the law enforcement agency gave an update. According to media reports, the service is facing a major crisis of self-confidence, with as many as three officers on average asking to resign on a daily basis. Internal polls say four officers out of five have been considering a change of profession lately.
“We have a major crisis. Many colleagues are choosing to quit,” police officer Peter Larsson told the Norwegian broadcaster NRK. “A drastically worsened working environment means many colleagues are now looking for other work.”
LOL, can you imagine what would happen then? If Sweden’s crime rate is this bad now, can you imagine what it will be like, when the aren’t any cops left at all?
If officers go into a no-go zone, they risk being verbally attacked or pelted with stones. Patrol cars may be set ablaze or stolen.
Sounds like your average African shithole really. Who could have possibly predicted that moving millions of third world people to the first world, would result in the first world becoming more like the third world? Seeing as all people are exactly the same (except white people are apparently born evil and with an uncontrollable urge to oppress non-white people), then surely this shouldn’t have happened. The magical European air and soil should have altered the behaviour of these third world people, and made them just like the indigenous Swedish people. Instead, for reasons I can’t figure out, they’re behaving the exact same way in Sweden, as they would have behaved in their original countries, and are therefore altering Sweden, rather than them being altered by Sweden.
Crime rates in the blacklisted areas are on the rise, the police report said. The offenses range from vandalism to drug crimes to sex assaults and gun violence. One particular example is Malmo, Sweden’s third-largest city, where more than 70 cars were set on fire by arsonists over several days. The police managed to arrest only one suspect while investigating those attacks.
I know this sounds bad, but just think about all the vast benefits these migrants are providing to Europe with their presence. All these violent crimes are a small price to pay when weighed up against these benefits. Admittedly, I can’t think of any examples of these benefits myself off the top of my head, but I know that they must exist because the controlled mainstream media and our political leaders keep telling us that they do.
Ironically, after the Hungarian government used the existence of no-go zones in Europe to promote its cause for an upcoming referendum on EU quotas, the Swedish embassy rebuked it saying that no such areas existed in their country.
“There are no “no-go zones” in Sweden.”
“Two plus two equals five.”
“We’ve always been at war with Eastasia.”
“It is important to us that accurate information about Sweden is given to the citizens of Hungary.
Good idea. You need to warn your own citizens about the danger they might face if they were ever to go down the same path that Sweden has. It has actually gotten so bad in the no-go zones, that some Somalis are actually considering fleeing back to Somalia, where it is safer.
The embassy has therefore had reason to object sharply to a map of Europe with red markings in a handful of member states, including Sweden, in which the Hungarian government claims that so-called ‘no-go zones’ exist, where police and the state have no control over citizens’ safety,” Anna Boda, the Deputy Head of the Swedish diplomatic mission in Budapest told The Local.
Yes, keep denying reality Sweden. It doesn’t matter because sooner or later, the truth will be impossible to cover up anyway. When you inevitably collapse into anarchy and civil war, you will serve as an example for the rest of us on what not to do.
“No-go zone” is a loaded term with no clear definition and caused division earlier amid the ongoing refugee crisis in Europe. Last year Paris wanted to sue Fox New for a report, which said no-go zones existed in the French capital.
That’s it France, cover up the truth as well.
This is what it’s like during the day. Can you imagine what it must be like at night?
This is all just completely insane. They can deny what’s happening all they want, but it’s not going to change anything. The clash between the indigenous European populations and the hostile invaders is inevitable. It’s not “if”, but “when” will it happen. The longer they deny it, rather than accepting it, the worse they’re going to make it when it does happen.
We will see a lot of bloodshed in Europe in our lifetimes.
The whining just never stops with these people. Unlike in America, where most blacks are descendants of slaves who were brought there against their will, every single black person living in Britain is there by choice, either their own, or that of their parents. No black person in Britain was forced to go there against their will. They all willingly chose to do so, because they wanted an opportunity to create a better life for themselves than they would have had back home in whichever black majority country they came from (it doesn’t matter which one, they all have much lower living standards than Britain does). You would think they would be grateful to have been giving the opportunity to live in a much better country, but no, they always find something stupid to whine about.
Universities across Britain might be causing psychological distress to black students because they’re forced to learn about mostly white Europeans, the National Union of Students (NUS) leader has said.
Who would have thought that a university in a European country, with a historically and pre-dominantly white European population, would mostly focus on the work, history, and accomplishments of white Europeans? I am shocked, shocked I tell you that something like this is happening.
NUS president Malia Bouattia, herself a black woman of Algerian heritage, believes that as most higher education is based on “Eurocentric” subjects, non-white undergraduates end up lagging behind.
The reason why it’s so “Eurocentric” is because most historical accomplishments, discoveries, inventions, etc, is of European origin, either directly, or from European derived societies such as America and Canada. That’s not to say that other parts of the world haven’t contributed as well, but these contributions are fairly minute compared to the contributions of Europe and North America.
Her comments follow an announcement from the UK government that universities need to increase their numbers of black and minority ethnic students fivefold by 2020.
Why do they “need” this? On the one hand, we’re always told that race is just skin pigmentation, and there are no other significant differences between us. At the same time, they’re demanding a drastic increase in racial diversity because we “need” it. How does this make sense? Why exactly is an increase in ethnic minorities attending university a necessity?
In an interview with the Guardian, Bouattia attacked how ‘white’ British university curricula can be, saying: “When we look at the incredibly Eurocentric curriculum, where people don’t see themselves in what they’re studying, and can’t relate to it, and feel that their European counterparts hit the ground running, they can’t see themselves advancing in the subjects.”
Then why did you choose to study at a British university then? If it upsets you so much attending a university which focuses more on its own culture and other European cultures, then why not go to some African university instead? You would feel a lot more at home, and we wouldn’t have to put up with your pathetic whining and demands. Everybody wins.
She added that on top of the “vast amounts of debt” many students have accumulated by the time they reach higher education, the lack of relatable topics of study available could be “psychologically destructive.”
Again, go to an African university to study “relatable topic” then. Why should a British university which you chose to attend, change its curriculum to accommodate your specific demands you arrogant and self-centered child?
The 28 year-old is the first black Muslim woman to lead the student body. She has previously talked about feeling estranged from her studies after being abused by online trolls and Islamophobes.
I don’t condone online harassment myself, but at the same time, my main sympathies are with the indigenous British people, whose culture and way of life is in the crosshairs. As I’ve said time and time again, multiculturalism does not work. Why not just admit that it has failed and allow the British people to study what’s relevant to them in a British university, and allow Muslim/Black people to study what’s relevant to them in their own countries of origin? This whole thing of trying to change European institutions to accommodate the needs and desires of everybody is never going to work. Changes might satisfy the minorites, but in doing so, you run the risk of upsetting the indigenous majorities, whose needs should come first in their own countries.
Independent think tank Social Market director Emran Mian told the Times that “while senior academic ranks may still be insufficiently diverse, the representation of minority perspectives in UK higher education should be improving.”
“About 14 percent of academic staff in UK universities identify as being from a black or minority ethnic background and almost 17 percent of students,” he added.
So that would mean that about 86% of students and 83% of academic staff are white then. But according to the 2011 census results2011 census results (the most recent available), the British population was 87.17% white. In the five years since, it has probably seen a slight decline in the population percentage, meaning an 86% representation of students, is in line with their population percentage, and 83% staff representation, is actually slightly lower than their population percentage. So in that case, why is there such a need for an increase in minorities at university level, when they’re already been represented quite fairly in relation to their population percentage?
Bouattia has been previously involved in controversy when she was accused of anti-Semitism after arguing that the University of Birmingham, which has a large Jewish student body, was a “Zionist outpost.” She denied the charges.
Yeah funny how that works, isn’t it? In the supposedly racist, white supremacist, British society, people like this are free to criticise the white British population to their heart’s content. Say something bad about the Jews, and suddenly it’s a problem. I wonder why that could be?
One of the things most noticeable about Trump rallies is the amount of pissed off Bernie and Hillary supporters who attend them for the sole purpose of causing trouble. We often hear about “violence” occurring at these rallies, and the media usually blames Trump and his supporters for it, even though it’s the protesters who almost always start it. You would think that if these people hated Trump so much, they wouldn’t bother going to see him speak, but they do so anyway because they are determined to silence him by acting up, and to intimidate anyone who supports him with their violent behaviour.
Why am I bringing this up? Well, simply to show the double standards that exist on the left. They’re perfectly OK with seeing some of their own using violence and intimidation to silence their ideological opponents, but when someone on the right simply uses facts and statistics to shut down their flawed arguments (no violent methods at all), they suddenly act as if they themselves are victims of violence and intimidation, and are outraged. They demand protection from the “hate” (ie. facts and logic), while at the same time being fully supportive of those who use genuine violence and hate against their own enemies.
Today, I’ve found a brief example of an insight into the thought patterns of these people.
To the editor:
Our department is committed to the principle of free speech.
Watch how they completely contradict this right away.
We wish, therefore, to go on record as opposing in the strongest possible terms the invitation that has been issued to Milo Yiannopoulos, who has tried to silence the free speech of others by drowning it out with abusive, hate-filled rhetoric.
“We are committed to the principle of free speech. However, this Milo guy has said mean words that hurt our feelings. Because unlike him, we don’t have any actual facts or statistics to back up any of the claims that we make, we’re simply incapable of having an honest and open discussion with him. Therefore, we’re going to ignore the facts and evidence in his arguments, accuse him of being abusive and hate-filled, and call for him to be silenced. But seriously, we’re totally on board with free speech, just free speech that we approve of.”
That’s literally what’s happening right now. They say that Milo silences the speech of others, but he isn’t doing it through abuse, or “hate”. He’s doing it through logical arguments and facts that his opponents aren’t intelligent or informed enough to argue against, which therefore leaves them unable to respond.
He doesn’t silence these people with hate or abuse. He doesn’t need to. They’re just fucking idiots who embarrass themselves whenever they try to defend their flawed ideologies. This is why they want to deny him a platform. They can’t win in a debate, so they have to silence him instead.
In an educational context, there is nothing to be learned from his presence except a negative lesson—that the most deliberately offensive and divisive voices are rewarded with attention they do not deserve. That is not what UD should be teaching.
Remember when universities where a place for fostering intellectual debate and discussion? A place where anyone could feel free to present an idea or argument, and others in turn had the freedom to either agree with it, or disagree and present their own counter idea instead. A place where young minds would be challenged so that might think outside the box for a change.
The whole point of education is to expand your mind by being exposed to new ideas and opinions. Today’s university students would rather be given an echo chamber to confirm what they already believe, rather than having their current worldviews challenged.
The Department of Women and Gender Studies
The department of future unemployables and professional victims.
Holy shit, what an eventful few days it has been. I’m not a superstitious man myself, but from looking at everything that has happened recently, I can only come to one conclusion. Some force more powerful than ourselves (the universe itself perhaps), seems to be causing certain events to unfold right now, for the sole purpose of reinforcing everything that Trump has said, has been right, and that people should vote for him in November and change course, while it is still possible to do so. I mean, lets take a look at some things that have happened recently.
Remember when Trump “Generalised all Mexican people as rapists”?
No, me neither, because he never did that. Although that didn’t stop the biased media claiming falsely that he did.
What he did say (in reference to Mexicans crossing the border illegally) was that many of these people who were making this illegal crossing were not Mexico’s best people, and that among them were rapists. Don’t believe me, listen to his own words.
Notice how he said that Mexico wasn’t sending its best people? And notice how he said that some who were coming are probably good people? In other words, he didn’t refer to all Mexicans as rapists. He just said that many of those who were coming illegally are, while the majority of good Mexican people (who he didn’t refer to as rapists) stay in Mexico.
And keep in mind as well, that he wasn’t just calling these illegal Mexican immigrants, rapists, for no reason whatsoever. He was simply stating something which the media already knew to be true. About 9 months before he even made this speech, The Huffington Post (one of the most blatantly anti-Trump newspapers out there) posted an article which stated that 80% of women who crossed the Mexican border, were raped along the way.
So 80% of women making the journey were raped along the way, and the men who raped them were making the same journey. Therefore it’s simply a fact to say that there are rapists who are crossing the border from Mexico into the US. Unfortunately, we live in a world were the truth doesn’t matter. Stating the simple fact that there are rapists from Mexico coming to America illegally, can cause offence to other Mexican people, just because they happen to be the same race as these rapists. Therefore, in our insane, politically correct world, the feelings of these people is more important than the safety and wellbeing of American women. We should sooner allow American women to be raped than say mean but truthful things about Mexican rapists, because it might hurt the feelings of non-rapist Mexicans if this is said.
In fact, it isn’t even just Mexicans specifically that might find these truthful things that Trump said to be offensive. Latino people in general are likely to be offended because in their minds, “Mexican” is just a codeword for “Latinos” in general. Such was the case with a Latino activist by the name of Tony Yapias, who despite being from Peru himself, felt that Trump’s comments about illegal Mexican’s being rapists, was offensive to all Latino people.
But in a hilarious twist of incredible irony, Yapias himself is now being charged with rape. Can you really imagine how that must make Trump’s detractors look? Here’s a prominent Latino man protesting against Trump for generalising all Latinos as rapists (something Trump never even did to begin with), and then he himself gets charged with rape. This is something that is simply beyond satire and it really plays into Trump’s hands. Despite the fact that Trump never even made such a generalisation, to the ordinary uninformed American voter who sees something like this happening, it’s just going to look as if it proves his point about them, even though it was a media lie, rather than a point he ever actually made.
But this isn’t all that has happened. There have been other incidents as well. Remember how Trump managed to offend a lot of people with his proposal to ban Muslim immigration to America if he was elected? One of the points he made was that Muslims don’t tend to integrate and assimilate into their host societies well. Well now we have the Muslim mayor of London, Sadiq Khan outright telling immigrants NOT TO INTEGRATE.
London Mayor Sadiq Khan, while on a trip to the northern U.S. city of Chicago Thursday, argued that new immigrants in America should not have to assimilate into American culture, but the government should instead do more to help them build “cohesive communities.”
“It’s not the immigrant’s job to integrate into their host society. The host society needs to do more to accommodate them instead.”
“One of the lessons from around the world is that a laissez faire or hands-off approach to social integration doesn’t work. We need rules, institutions and support to enable people to integrate into cohesive communities and for the avoidance of doubt, I don’t mean assimilation, I mean integration, and there’s a difference,” Khan said. “People shouldn’t have to drop their cultures and traditions when they arrive in our cities and countries.”
And why shouldn’t they give them up? Many cultural practices and traditions from Islamic countries such as the way they treat women and gay people, Sharia Law, polygny, female genital mutialtion, halal slaughter of animals, sexual exploitation of little boys, etc., are completely incompatible with our own Western values. Why should we allow you to keep up cultures and traditions, which are incompatible with our own in the countries that we built? If you want to maintain your primitive and barbaric practices then do so in your home countries rather than inflicting it upon us. You want to live in our superior countries, you play by our rules. Otherwise, fuck off back to the failed country that you crawled out of.
In the past, Trump called for a total ban on Muslim immigration into the U.S., but has since softened his position and said he would only ban immigration from countries with a “proven history of terrorism.”
Which pretty much disqualifies every Muslim majority country anyway so it doesn’t make much of a difference.
“We play straight into the hands of those who seek to divide us, of extremists and terrorists around the world, when we imply that it’s not possible to hold Western values dear and to be a Muslim,” Khan said.
And yet there’s not a single Muslim majority country on the planet with a value system that is in line with western ones. Maybe individuals who consider themselves Muslim can appreciate Western values, but as the information from Muslim Statistics shows, many do not. And I would have to ask in all honesty, is it really worth importing these alleged good Muslims, when in doing so, we run the risk of also importing the bad ones? Has anyone done a cost/benefits analysis of this policy? Do the good Muslims really bring enough benefits to outweigh the negatives of the bad ones? Because honestly, I don’t think they do.
Anyway, beyond the issue of assimilation and integration, Trump also favoured a ban on Muslim immigration due to the associated risk of an increase in terrorist attacks. And, would you just look at what’s after happening yesterday.
An explosion in a crowded Manhattan neighborhood on Saturday night left 29 people injured, and authorities said a second nearby site was also being investigated. At a news conference on Sunday, Mayor Bill de Blasio said the incident was caused by a bomb and that all 29 injured people have now been released from the hospital.
“We know there was a bombing. That much we do know. We know it was a very serious incident, but we have a lot more work to do to be able to say what kind of motivation was behind this. Was it a political motivation? A personal motivation? We do not now that yet,” said de Blasio.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a news conference Sunday, “a bomb exploding in New York is obviously an act of terrorism, but it’s not linked to international terrorism. In other words, we find no ISIS connection etc. A bomb going off is generically a terrorist activity. That’s how we’re going to consider it and that’s how we’re going to prosecute it also.”
But how exactly can they be sure already that ISIS isn’t connected? I’m not necessarily saying that they’re definitely wrong. They may very well be right, but there’s no way they can be sure yet before they’ve had a chance to properly investigate what happened. They don’t have any suspects in custody, nor do they know what the motive was, so how can they automatically dismiss ISIS, when they don’t actually know anything yet? To me, it seems as if they just made a point of downplaying a possible ISIS connection because with the election coming up, they don’t want it to look as if Trump was right about his proposal to ban Muslim immigration, and possibly seeing more voters defect to his side.
The FBI is investigating the Crossroads Center knife attacks on Saturday as “a potential act of terrorism.”
Nine people were injured by an attacker who was killed inside the Macy’s store by an off-duty Avon police officer.
St. Cloud Mayor Dave Kleis identified that officer as Jason Falconer during a press conference Sunday.
A short time earlier, St. Cloud Somali-American community members identified the deceased suspect as Dahir Adan.
Leaders of the Somali-American community in St. Cloud gathered Sunday with his family and issued a statement of sympathy for the family and the nine victims of the attack.
Community leader Abdul Kulane said as far as the family and community know, the suspect did not have any history of violence. He was known as a smart, accomplished student at Apollo High School. He was a junior at St. Cloud State University, Kulane said. Adan was also working part-time as a private security officer, leaders said.
The last time he was seen by family was about 6 or 6:30 p.m. Saturday when he said he was going to the mall to buy an iPhone 7. They don’t know what happened after that.
So a Somali man (99.8% chance he was Muslim) went on a stabbing spree in a shopping mall for seemingly no reason. Perhaps he was just yet another victim of the great mental health crisis of 2016, which seems to only effect Muslims, and causes them to murder non-Muslim people at random for no reason whatsoever.
The man who stabbed nine people at a Minnesota mall Saturday before being shot dead by an off-duty police officer was a “soldier of the Islamic state,” according to an ISIS-linked news agency.
Now obviously, ISIS claims responsibility for every single act of terrorism committed by Muslims in the Western world, so this might not be true. However this does again play into Trump’s hands perfectly. In just one day we have two terrorist attacks which may very well have been committed by Muslims, and a third which definitely was, and suddenly less than two months before the election, his proposal to ban Muslims from immigrating to the US is looking like simple common sense, rather than the hate filled racism and bigotry, that the media tries to claim it to be.
So we have Trump proposing a wall to keep out Mexican rapists, and a ban on Muslim immigration because of their inability to assimilate, and the risk of an increase in terrorist attacks because of their immigration. The media crucifies Trump for saying these things as apparently being “false” and “racist”. Then after being constantly told that Trump was lying, we suddenly have a Latino activist who protested Trump’s comments about Mexican rapists getting arrested for rape himself, a Muslim leader outright telling Muslims not to integrate into their host nations, three terrorists attacks in one day (one of which we’re sure was done by a Muslim, and the other two likely were as well), backing up the points Trump has made, and this all happens within the space of a few days, less than two months before the election. It really is as if the universe itself is outright telling us that Trump is the right choice. And yet despite all this, rather than accepting the fact that Trump was right, the media still acts as if Trump is the real threat to America, simply because he says mean words, and he and his son have re-tweeted images of a “Nazi frog”.
How can anybody take any of this insanity seriously? We’re literally seeing Trump’s statements being backed up by objective reality, but the media would rather be outraged over his son posting images of a “Nazi frog” on twitter, than on people getting murdered or raped, because of a flawed immigration system, something which Trump simply pointed out was happening and wants to fix. Keep in mind, that he never proposed stopping immigration entirely. He just wants an immigration policy that works to the benefit, rather than the detriment of the American people, and yet the media acts as if his proposals are a greater evil than the consequences we’re seeing unfold because of this flawed system. I literally cannot comprehend what is happening, it’s so completely nonsensical to me. And I hope that at this point, it should seem just as nonsensical to the American voters. If they can’t see at this point, I don’t think they ever will.
So two of the worst leaders in modern European history met recently to discuss the future of the EU in the post Brexit world. Not much to discuss really, but I figured I could get a quick post out of it.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel was in Paris to meet the French President to swap notes ahead of the Bratislava summit of EU leaders, minus Britain on Friday.
I really don’t see any point in either of these two making any plans for Europe’s future. Both France and Germany will have elections in 2017, and I’d be amazed if either of them will see a return to power, unless there is a drastic change in how they operate between now and then. Merkel, who once enjoyed a 67% approval rate, is now sitting at just 45%. This is primarily due to her insane and unwavering support for the fake refugees, who have been running rampant in Germany, which has led to an increase in sexual assaults on German women and girls, terrorists attacks, and other cases of “random” violence, against the German population who were at one point, very open and welcoming towards the migrants. If it’s at 45% now, with so many months to go until the election itself, who knows how much lower it could be by the time it does happen, as the number of incoming migrants, and by extension, migrant crimes increases.
Hollande meanwhile is currently polling at a laughably pathetic figure of just 16% approval. I could probably at least see some small chance of Merkel scraping her way back into power (but with a significantly reduced amount of support), but I think Hollande has absolutely no chance at all. So for that reason, I don’t see why either of these two should be making plans for the future of Europe when in all likelihood, neither of them will be around long enough to implement them.
Merkel said it was crucial that the EU addresses its weakness, before describing the challenges of security, immigration and youth unemployment.
I love how she mentions immigration and youth unemployment as being problems that need to be solved, when it’s quite frankly impossible to solve the youth unemployment problem, while at the same time, sticking to her insane immigration policy of infinity illiterate, useless, welfare leeches from Africa and the Middle East. One of the main reasons why there is such a problem with youth unemployment in Europe at all is because there simply aren’t enough jobs available to employ them. At the same time, importing countless uneducated people who have no useful skills, will just lead to even greater competition for the few available entry level jobs that a young unemployed European could potentially use to get their foot on the career ladder. In fact, Merkel is literally pressuring employers tohire these useless migrants ahead of Germans. How does that make sense? How can she seriously claim to want to solve the youth unemployment problem, when implementing a policy like that?
While Francois Hollande said:
“I believe we must be clear about the situation in Europe. As I have often recalled, this is not one more crisis, it could be the crisis of its existence, its very foundations. That is why we must have in mind to give to Europeans a clear vision of what can be and what will be their future”.
A lot of Europeans don’t think there is a future for them, and it’s because of the decisions that people like you two have undertaken, that we feel this way. We didn’t want to let infinity third world savages come to Europe to live on welfare while they periodically murder and gang rape us, until they eventually outbreed us and finish us off entirely in a couple of generations, but that’s what’s happening now, whether we like it or not. Fortunately, people have had enough and are starting to look elsewhere for solutions. It won’t be people like you making the decisions in the near future. We will find others who represent our actual beliefs instead, and no amount of shaming tactics in the controlled mainstream media will change that. They can call us racist or xenophobic all they want, but if the choice is between our survival, or not being called mean names by an enemy that wants us dead anyway, I think the choice is obvious.
From the political soul-searching the pair picked three main points of focus: security and defence, the digital future and youth unemployment.
By “Security and Defence” they mean security and defence against anyone who opposes their evil plans to destroy us.
By “Digital Future” they mean finding ways to control the internet, so we can’t share the truth about what is going on, with one another.
By “youth unemployment” they mean migrants, not European youths.
They could not be more transparent. But there actions won’t be forgotten. When we finally have representatives who truly represent us, they will have to answer for their crimes against the European people. Justice will be done.
As I’m sure you all know by now, the media has been doing everything in their power to slander the good name of our Glorious Leader, Donald Trump. And I’m sure you’ve also noticed that every single tactic they have tried so far has failed miserably. No matter what they say, nothing seems to have any significant impact against him. Try as they might to cover up the many many scandals of the hell bitch, Hillary, whilst simultaneously devoting unwarranted attention and faux outrage, to every single thing Trump says and does, nothing seems to work.
In fact, the latest polls have him coming out ahead of Hillary. It’s absolutely amazing to see really. You can tell that Trump’s detractors are really in the full on panic stages now, as the reality begins to sink in for them. He might very well win the election afterall, despite their tireless efforts to prevent it.
The desperation and panic is causing them to behave in funny and outrageous ways. They’re desperately trying to find something, anything at all, that they can use against him. At this point, they’ve thrown so much at him already, that there really isn’t much left that they can say… or so I thought. It seems that the Hillary campaign themselves have managed to come up with perhaps the most stupid attack against him that I’ve seen so far.
So lets read a bit more about this “Sinister frog”.
Over the weekend, Donald Trump’s son and one of his closest advisers posted an odd photo on their social media accounts:
The “Deplorables” image at the top of this post.
This raised some important questions.
Why is there a frog standing directly behind Trump?
That’s Pepe. He’s a symbol associated with white supremacy.
Wait. Really? White supremacy?
Yes, you read that right. The image of Pepe, the cartoon frog is a symbol associated with white supremacy. How can anyone possibly read this and not laugh in amazement at it?
Here’s the short version: Pepe is a cartoon frog who began his internet life as an innocent meme enjoyed by teenagers and pop stars alike.
But in recent months, Pepe’s been almost entirely co-opted by the white supremacists who call themselves the “alt-right.” They’ve decided to take back Pepe by adding swastikas and other symbols of anti-semitism and white supremacy.
Again, let me stress the insanity of this. They’re literally complaining about Trump re-tweeting images that have a cartoon frog in them, just because a few internet “white supremacists” have made images in which he is wearing a swastika. Trump has never re-tweeted any of those images by the way. Just other, innocent images, which happen to feature Pepe in them.
Trump has retweeted his white supremacist supporters with regularity, but the connection between the alt-right and his campaign continues to strengthen. Trump has been slow to disavow support from Ku Klux Klansmen and white supremacy groups, and he recently hired Breitbart.com’s Steve Bannon as his campaign CEO (and Bannon isn’t shy about the fact that his “news” organization is the “platform for the alt-right”).
And Hillary herself was very close to a former KKK leader, Senator Robert Byrd. Yes I’m well aware that Byrd left the KKK decades before his death, but incidentally, so did David Duke (the “KKK leader” who endorsed Trump). So why is it ok to bring up Duke’s KKK past, but not Byrd’s?
Now white supremacists have given Pepe the cartoon frog some Trump hair—and the candidate’s own son says he is “honored to be grouped with” him.
Why wouldn’t he be. The image portrays all these men (plus Pepe) as action heroes, and on top of that,it’s hilarious. I’m guessing that Trump Junior just has a healthy sense of humour.
Let me get this straight: Trump’s presidential campaign is posting memes associated with white supremacy online?
But it’s just his son and one of his closest advisers, right?
Oh yeah, Glorious Leader himself got in on the action of re-tweeting Pepe images.
Once again, let me stress that this is actually a serious political attack against Trump. They’re actually genuinely appalled at him for re-tweeting a funny image of himself as a cartoon frog. How are people supposed to take this sort of thing seriously? Can you imagine what it’s like for a normal, undecided voter reading this? You’ve just watched the latest news story about a Muslim terrorist attack, Mexican drug cartels smuggling drugs across the border, a factory moving to the third world with the loss of hundreds of American jobs, or Black Lives Matter protesters burning down their city and beating up any hapless white people that they chance upon. And then you read Hillary’s site and see this, that the biggest threat facing America right now is Donald Trump, because he re-tweets images of a harmless looking cartoon frog. How can anyone possibly take this stupidity seriously?
Just curious: Who else is in this photo?
Notably, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who believes the government was behind the 9/11 (and that Newtown was “completely fake”),
Yes we all know that Alex Jones is a joke. But he sure is a funny joke though. Remember that time David Duke (yes, the same David Duke from above) utterly destroyed him?
and Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos, whose racism and bigotry is so egregious that Twitter banned him from using their site.
Btw, they also try to promote Milo as the leader of the “alt right”, which they also claim are a bunch of Neo-Nazi, White Supremacists. A Neo-Nazi, White Supremacist organisation, with a gay Jew, who sleeps with black men, as their leader. How do they keep a straight face when they make these claim?
This is horrifying.
What can I do?
I wish I could. Because if I could, I would definitely vote for Trump.