No, this isn’t a story from Sweden… though it sure sounds like it should be. There was a story back in June, about an Iraqi migrant brutally raping a 10 year old boy at a swimming pool in Austria, because he hadn’t had sex in a few months and it was a “sexual emergency”. The migrant was given a typically lenient sentence, and I assumed that would be the last I would hear about it. After all, there are plenty of other migrant rape cases going on, that there is no point dwelling on one from the past. So it came as a big surprise to see this story come up again, many months later. What isn’t surprising however, is that the story has managed to make me lose even more faith in humanity than I already had.
An Iraqi migrant who raped a schoolboy in a swimming pool has had his sentence overturned – because the court didn’t prove if he knew that the child said no.
This won’t end well at all.
The attacker, who has been identified as 20-year-old Amir A, was visiting Theresienbad pool in Vienna in December as part of an integration process.
They won’t even reveal this animal’s full name. He’ll not only escape consequences for what he already did, but he’ll be anonymous and free to prey upon… um sorry, I mean, find more “consenting” 10 year old boys to brutally sodomise against their will.
However, he violently sexually assaulted a 10-year-old boy in the changing room, claiming it was a ‘sexual emergency’ because he had not had sex for a while.
Instead of masturbating, or finding a prostitute, his solution to his “sexual emergency” was to grab a 10 year old child and brutally rape him.
You can understand why the court is going easy on him, right?
On Friday, an appeal court accepted the defence lawyer’s claim that the lower court had not done enough to ascertain whether or not the rapist had registered that the boy said no.
He must not have been able to hear the child’s screams, or see all the blood coming from his anus. Also apparently, 10 year old children are old enough to consent to sex in Austria, and it isn’t considered statutory rape. I never knew that.
The child, who is still being treated for a post-traumatic stress disorder, suffered severe anal injuries and required urgent treatment at a local children’s hospital.
If you still support this current ongoing invasion of Europe after reading this and believe that you have the moral high ground, then there is something very wrong with you. This insanity needs to end. We need to keep these monsters out.
The victim, Goran, was an immigrant from the Balkans who grew up in Austria with his Serbian mother.
Following the incident, Amir A, who had worked in Iraq as a taxi driver, went back into the pool and was using the diving board when police turned up.
He didn’t even try to flee the scene of the crime. I can’t tell if that’s a testament to his stupidity, or the idea that he genuinely didn’t think he’d done anything wrong. Either way, this animal is not compatible with the civilised world.
He confessed to the rape stating that he knew it was wrong but did it anyway because he had not had sex for four months.
Oh never mind, he did understand that what he did was wrong. He just didn’t care.
He was found guilty of serious sexual assault and rape of a minor and was sentenced to six years in jail.
Just six years for brutally assaulting and undoubtedly, mentally scarring for life, a 10 year old child. Even if the sentence had stuck, it would be disgracefully inadequate.
However, the Supreme Court has now lifted the verdict and ordered a re-execution of the proceedings.
According to The Local, Supreme Court President Thomas Philipp said that although the verdict was ‘watertight’ with regard to the serious sexual abuse of a juvenile, the written verdict on the second indictment, rape, cannot be sufficiently proved.
First of all, you would think it would be pretty easily proven, just from looking at the boy’s injuries. Do you really think anybody would consent to endure that? Second of all, even if the boy was “up for it”, he’s still only 10 years old. At the very least, it’s statutory rape.
According to the court, the initial trial should have ascertained whether the offender had thought that the victim agreed with the sexual act and whether he had the intention to act against the will of the boy.
HE ADMITTED ON TAPE THAT HE KNEW IT WAS WRONG WHAT HE DID!!!
He obviously knew.
In the second legal process, which is expected to take place in 2017, a new sentence must be imposed.
The 20-year-old will remain in custody until then.
At which point, he’ll probably be acquitted and compensated for “having his human rights breached” by being kept in custody for so long, or something.