So I may have jumped the gun in my last post when I talked about how the guilty party in the Berlin attack was a Pakistani refugee. It turns out, he was simply the lead suspect at the time and was later released due to a lack of any solid evidence against him.
It turns out that the real guy who was responsible for doing it is actually a “Tunisian Refugee” instead. I would just like to say that I’m sorry for jumping to the conclusion that a Muslim who came into Europe posing as a refugee, from a safe country was responsible, when it was actually a different Muslim, who came into Europe posing as a refugee from a different safe country who was responsible instead.
German police are hunting for a Tunisian refugee in connection with the deadly truck attack at a Berlin Christmas market — identifying him after finding an asylum document under the vehicle’s driver’s seat, according to reports.
The asylum seeker, who was born in the southern Tunisian city of Tataouine in 1992, is named in the document as Anis Amri, German news site Spiegel Online reported.
Born in “Tataouine” you say? That’s a very strange misspelling of “Tatooine”
A German security official told CNN that Amri had been arrested in the southern town of Friedrichshafen in August with forged documents en route to Italy but was released by a judge.
He is a “highly dangerous” member of a large Islamic group and received weapons training abroad before arriving in Germany last year, security sources told the Daily Mail.
“But sure we just let him into the country anyway, despite knowing how dangerous he is.”
Amri, who uses three different names, was arrested in August with a fake Italian passport and released — but his phone was said to be monitored, the Mail reported. He then disappeared in December.
Damn fine police work, just losing him like that.
The asylum document found in the truck announced a stay of deportation, the Telegraph of the UK reported. The document was issued in the town of Kleve near the border with the Netherlands and Belgium.
A Facebook profile in his name shows “likes” of Tunisian terror group Ansar al-Sharia, whose jihadists slaughtered 22 people at Tunis’ Bardo Museum in March 2015 and then 39 tourists at a beach resort in Sousse.
Amri, who may be injured, was being sought in the western state of North Rhine-Westphalia, where he had been registered at a refugee shelter in the town of Emmerich on the Rhine, on the Dutch-German border, The Guardian reported.
He had ties to Salafism — an ultra-conservative branch of Sunni Islam — in connection with Islamist hate preacher Ahmad Abdelazziz A, known as Abu Walaa, from Hildesheim in Germany, the Sueddeutsche Zeitung newspaper reported. Abdelazziz was arrested in November.
But sure despite all this, he was just a harmless little lamb who was trying to flee the Syrian Civil War from Tunisia, and it would have been a violation of his human rights to keep him out of Germany. Sure don’t you know, everybody has a God given right to go live in any country they want. “Borders” and “National Sovereignty” are just outdated concepts invented by racist, white supremacists, for the purpose of oppressing people of different racial groups, for absolutely no reason.
Anyway, the rest of the article is pretty irrelevant. It just kind of rambles on. The important stuff was all in the beginning, but the link i there, if you wish to read the rest of it.
Oh and BTW, we also now know who was responsible for the Mosque shooting in Zurich.
Officials described the man as a 24-year-old Swiss citizen of Ghanaian descent, but they did not identify him by name. They said that he had no known links to terrorist groups, but that he was already wanted for the fatal stabbing of a friend whose body was found on Sunday at a playground in Zurich.
So yeah, not the white supremacist that I’m sure the media was hoping for, but a black guy instead. I don’t know how exactly they’ll use this story going forward. On the one hand, the Muslim victims fit the narrative they’ll want to push, but without a white perpetrator to blame, I’m not sure it’s really worth their while to push it. I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if they still use the story anyway in the future to talk about “Islamophobia”, but without making any references to the shooter himself, in the hopes that people will eventually forget the details, and just assume it was a white guy who did it. That way, they wouldn’t technically be lying, as it would just be the people making their own assumptions to suit the narrative.
We’ll just have to see.