Germany may have finally equaled Sweden’s patheticness.

I’m sure we’re all well aware at this point of the epidemic of violence that Muslim migrants have been committing against native European women. We’re also aware at this point that Germany, the country which is hosting the largest overall number of them (though in proportion to population size, Sweden still has them beat), has been one of the most badly affected countries of all. Needless to say, this sort of thing has a tendency to make people angry, and really, why shouldn’t they be angry? It’s perfectly understandable that the people would be starting to get a little restless, watching these almost constant attacks being committed against them by outsiders whom they’ve welcomed with open arms into their country.

What were they thinking? Did they really think that armies of young, fit men with cultural backgrounds in which women are treated like property, and who were leaving non-war-torn countries, were really “refugees” worth “welcoming”?

So what’s Germany to do in order to quell this anger? Well, arresting people for “hate speech” for simply criticising the government’s policies was a nice start. As we all know, when your government invites millions of hostile invaders to settle in your country, and these invaders start murdering and raping your people en masse, the real dangerous criminals that need to be stopped, are ordinary citizens who might say mean, hurtful truths on the internet, about these invaders. Unfortunately, sending the modern day equivalent of the Stasi to “disappear” thought criminals in the middle of the night, while effective at intimidating people, does not necessarily convince them that you have the moral highground.

And that brings us to the main point of this post. If the German people are starting to get angry about all the attacks on their women, then what they need is to see that the reverse could happen as well, in order to make them understand that all people are exactly the same, and they shouldn’t be noticing certain patterns that seem to be occurring and allowing it to anger them so much. So, some enterprising German crime TV show, broadcast a scene of three ethnic German men ganging up and attacking a Muslim woman who was walking alone at night… something which I don’t think has ever actually happened at all, and even if it has, happens at such a low rate as to be statistically insignificant in comparison to the countless numbers of attacks perpetuated by Muslim men on ethnic German women. Let’s take a look.

Now obviously, this isn’t the kind of footage that is being passed off as “real”. However, just the image of ethnic German men attacking a Muslim woman, fictional or not, is enough to stick in a person’s mind. Kind of like how if you were to imagine an interracial relationship (in America particularly because that’s where most of our popular culture comes from), what do you think the most common interracial relationship is, in which one partner is white, and the other is of a different race? If I was to guess what you were thinking, it would probably be a black man with a white (usually blonde) woman. In reality, a white woman with a Hispanic man, or a white man with a Hispanic or Asian woman, are all more likely than a black man/white woman relationship.


However, despite how uncommon the aforementioned black man/white woman relationship is in comparison, it’s usually the first one people imagine, because that is the one that is most often portrayed on TV and in movies.

The blonde Supergirl with black Jimmy Olsen as her love interest in the “Supergirl” TV Series is just one example of this trope.
The same with Will Smith’s and Margot Robbie’s characters in the film “Focus”.
Then there’s these two characters from “Texas Chainsaw 3D”.

That is the power that the media has. They can take an image of something that isn’t really that common, but give it extra exposure that is disproportionate to it’s frequency in real life, and convince people that it’s more common than it really is. It’s like with the current promotion of transgender people by the media these days. We see a lot more trans celebrities, we see a lot more protests from trans activists, and we see more attempts by lawmakers to appease their demands with regards to toilets, showers, changing rooms, pronouns, etc. With how much time and attention they have been getting the last few years, you would think there would be a really large amount of them, at least 2% of the population or so. In reality, the best estimates available currently suggests that it’s only about 0.3% of the population, but such is the attention that they are receiving these days, that it’s easy to believe that there are a lot more than there really are.

This is the same kind of logic that applies to this video of German men attacking a Muslim woman. The whole point behind it, is to use this effect to trick people into thinking that this sort of thing actually happens, in order to undermine the rightful anger that the German people are feeling right now about the actual attacks that are happening against them. This sort of distortion of reality is right out of the Orwellian playbook, and really illustrates the contempt that the German state and the controlled media, has towards its people. I only hope that Merkel is defeated in the election this year, and that the German media ends up in a similar dire position in regards to their level of public trust, as the American media is now.


“How do you do fellow white people?”

I have on several past occasions, discussed the common practice employed by Jews, whereby they claim to be white people themselves whenever they want to lecture “fellow white people” about how evil and racist we all are, or use peer pressure to trick us into making decisions that go against our own group interests, but will then hide behind their Jewish identity, whenever they want to feign victimhood, promote their own group interests, or avoid any angry backlash on white people, that they themselves have stirred up with the narrative they present about us. In fact, thanks to the internet, there are numerous examples of this habit that have been immortalised for all to see.

Lets take a look at a few.



No multiculturalism for us Jews, but my “fellow white people” must accept it.


Claims to be a white man  to tell us that we can’t experience racism.
Claims to be a white man to justify hatred towards white men.


Now you might say, what’s the big deal here? How is this any different than a white, Christian person talking about their Christian identity in some scenarios, while lecturing their fellow white people in other scenarios? Well it’s quite simple really. Christianity is just simply a religion. It is not a racial category, so when the white Christian talks about his Christianity, he isn’t renouncing his “whiteness” so to speak. On the other hand, there are a lot of people, including numerous Jews themselves, who consider “Jew” to be their racial category, not white, regardless of how light their skin pigmentation may be. They don’t consider themselves to be white in much the same way, that Australian aborigines aren’t thought of as “black” which is the racial category that we use to describe people of Sub-Saharan African descent, regardless of how dark their skin colour may be. In the same way, white as a racial category tends to refer to people of European descent, not simply to people with light skin.

Indeed there is a lot of reason to support this idea that Jews are a distinct race as they, having evolved in the Middle East rather than Europe, and later having been isolated away in ghettos from the general population of the European countries that they settled in for centuries, were limited to breeding only with each other. Therefore, they have a distinct gene pool that separates them from white people. Jews themselves are aware of this seeing as Israel actually uses DNA tests to test whether or not a prospective citizen is a Jew or not. Surely if Jews were just followers of a particular religion, then simply converting to the Jewish faith would be enough to be considered a Jew.

So you might be wondering, why exactly I’m bringing this up right now? Well, it’s because of a rather amusing video that was posted on YouTube the other day. You know how I pointed out above some examples of Jews claiming to be white people in order to lecture “fellow white people”? Well now we can see actual footage of an example of it in action.

Check it out…

I would like to particularly draw attention to the part 15 seconds in. Notice how he gives a nervous laugh when the camera man asks him if he’s Jewish? It’s as if he’s thinking to himself “Oh shit, my cover is blown”. It’s absolutely incredible to see because it’s almost exactly what leading Nazi, Joseph Goebbels says happens when they are exposed like this.


It’s very interesting to see him claiming to be representing “white men against Trump”, despite being a Jew, when you take into consideration the respective percentages of white men and Jews who voted for him.

Wow, 63% of white men voted for Trump.
But only 25% of Jews voted for Trump. Strange how white people in general overwhelmingly supported Trump, but not Jews.

This guy was attempting to promote his own Jewish interests, but to disguise it as the actions of a “white man” when doing so. It’s one thing for a group to promote their own interests, but to do so using deception and trickery, and making it look as if they’re part of another group entirely, is as low as it gets. And believe me, he knew exactly what he was doing, if his nervous laugh upon getting called out on it is anything to go by. If ever you see a Jew attempting to shame us into following policies that you think are at odds with our own group interests, it is probably a good idea to remember this video, and to remember this little piece of advice…


Corpulent slob, Michael Moore thinks he can speak for all women.


The morbidly obese slob Michael Moore, famous for his series of propaganda documentaries about how terrible the institutions of Western civilisation are, has taken a break from using the capitalist model to become a multi-millionaire, all while trying to shill to us the alleged benefits of embracing full on Communism, to instead tell us about how all the women who voted for Trump only did so because of their own “internalised misogyny”. In other words, women don’t have any agency of their own and can’t be held responsible for their own decisions, in the eyes of this bloated buffoon if they vote for someone he disapproves of. Only women who voted against Trump do, and any who voted for him, only did so because they were brainwashed by the oppression they suffer from the “patriarchy”… or something like that. They’re all just “victims” of misogyny, rather than normal adults who have a different political view than him. Lets take a look at the clip.

Direct quote:

We’ve ignored the misogyny and the sexism that is still so prevalent and ingrained, and ingrained in many of the victims, the 46% of women that voted for Trump, and the 53% of white women that voted for Trump.

It’s just incredible really how this gargantuan swine can act as if he speaks for the experiences of the millions of women who voted for Trump, and assumes they didn’t do so in their own best interests. It doesn’t seem to occur to him that maybe these women are self-confident and strong enough, not to take offence to Trump’s low-brow choices of words.

Which group of women do you think are most likely to be confident and secure in themselves, just going by your gut feeling?

Maybe these women just support his policy on Muslim immigration, because they don’t want America to go down the same path Sweden has. Maybe they were won over by his condemnation of Mexican rapists crossing the border illegally, (something even the anti-Trump, Huffington Post admits really is happening). Maybe these female Trump voters believe that Hillary is worse for women, considering the fact that her campaign was partially financed by Saudi Arabia, arguably the country with the worst record for women’s rights on the planet. Perhaps these things matter more to these women than Trump saying “sexist things”.

I don’t know, because unlike Michael Moore, I know that I cannot speak on behalf of these women, and say for certain why they voted the way they did. But I will say that they did so, I believe, because they felt that Trump was the candidate who best represented their interests. It wasn’t because they hate themselves and all other women, no matter what Michael Moore would have us believe.

Finland encouraging children to rat out their parents for thought crimes.


Whenever there is a brutal, tyrannical, regime in power, it isn’t unusual for those living under it, to try to resist or speak out against its oppression of them. However, for obvious reasons, this is often done in secrecy, for fear of the consequences that can result in doing so openly. Arguably the most oppressive regime that has ever existed, was the Soviet Union during the Stalin era. Like any other oppressive regime, there were many people living under it, who resented it, and tried to fight back in their own way, even if it was just something as simple as keeping more than their allocated share of grain from the farms they worked on, rather than handing it all over to Soviet authorities, and only being handed a small amount back, barely enough to survive on.

If people like this, just trying to survive the Holodomor, had the audacity to try and hold onto some grain that they grew themselves, they were committing a crime.

The Soviet authorities needed to find ways to catch people who were resisting their oppression, and one of the main methods they used, was the use of informants to rat others out. The most despicable thing of all that they did to recruit potential informants, was to brainwash children into spying upon and ratting out their own parents, for committing crimes against the state. The parent would then most likely end up doing slave labour in a gulag in Siberia, or murdered, all because their own child was encouraged to sell them out.

It seems that the modern west is taking lessons from that disgraceful era. In Finland, there is currently a campaign underway to encourage children to inform on their parents, if they post politically incorrect things on the internet. Lets just take a look.

It all just comes off as so cute and innocent. The mother posts a “naughty thing” on Social Media to some politician that she has a problem with, her daughter thinks this is unacceptable, and reports her to her lion teddy, who then turns into some guy in a lion mascot costume. The guy in the lion costume wags his finger at the mother for being such a naughty woman, while her daughter lectures her, and the woman seems to have learned her lesson. Then there is a weird song and dance number about how posting certain nasty comments online (no specific guidelines on what counts exactly) may be a criminal offence, and that you can be punished for it. It’s all portrayed as a simple public service announcement, aiming to inform people to be careful that they don’t accidentally commit a crime by saying the wrong thing.

It isn’t so cute and innocent at all. In the last couple of years, we’ve gradually started seeing changes in the way the European masses think. We’ve been experiencing one disaster after another, as a result of the genocidal mass immigration policies that our political establishment has inflicted upon us. None of us were ever given a vote on whether or not we even wanted to become multicultural societies. We had the decision forced upon us against our wills, and if the popularity of Donald Trump’s anti-immigration comments in America are anything to go by, I believe that if we were given a vote on the matter, and both sides were given an equal platform to make their cases, that all over Europe, we would reject it if given the option to do so.

However, the political establishment are not going to give up on their plans so easily and seeing as they can’t possibly win the debate on the merit of their arguments (lets face it, what are the alleged benefits of multiculturalism, and do these alleged benefits outweigh the consequences that we’ve seen unfold?), they have to use more and more oppressive tactics to silence dissent, and now clearly they’re aiming to follow the example that Soviet Union set 80 years ago, by using impressionable children as informants against their own parents who speak out against their plans. That is how evil and sick these people are, and yet they will project and claim that we’re the evil ones for speaking out against our own ongoing genocide.

There’s a Hitler quote that seems appropriate for what they are attempting to do.


We can’t allow them them to brainwash children like this. You can be sure that it won’t just be Finland trying this soon enough. The rest of Europe will inevitably follow. If they do manage to own the youth, they will gain the future, and from the looks of things, it will be a very grim future indeed.

Gunman yelling “Allahu Akbar” in Spain.

After a fairly good run, it’s now time to reset the counter again.

The great mental health crises that disproportionately affects Muslim men and causes them to murder people randomly, has struck again. Nobody could have possibly predicted this would ever happen because as we all know, pattern recognition is evil, and therefore nobody is allowed to use the numerous similar events that have occurred in the past, as a predictor of events that may occur in the future. No instead, lets just all act sad about this for a few days, quickly forget all about it, and then move on with our lives until it happens all over again. Then lets repeat the same process rather than actually trying to solve the problem once and for all.

Maybe it will eventually solve the problem, if we try it a few more times.

From The Express

A GUNMAN has opened fire in a Spanish supermarket while shouting “Allahu Akbar”, police have said.

Police and politicians are probably baffled as to what the motive could have been.

“It’s so obvious that the frog represents Nazism, but we have no idea what a Muslim man yelling “Allahu Akbar” while he murders people, could mean.”

The man was reportedly carrying gasoline and gunpowder in his pockets as he entered the Mercadona shop, in As Lagoas, Ourense.

Numerous shoppers were inside making their purchases when the assailant, who was armed with a shotgun, entered and fired several shots.

Damn those Spanish, and their obsession with guns. They’re just like America with their loose gun control laws. They need to implement stricter gun control laws, if they want to prevent tragedies like this from occurring.

Oh wait…

“The regulation of weapons (firearms, airguns, knives, crossbows, etc.) in Spain is very restrictive even by EU standards, with extensive controls and prohibitions, and is administered by the Guardia Civil.”

But…but… that doesn’t fit the narrative. Leftist politicians and the media are always saying that strict gun control laws will solve the gun violence problem in America, every time there is a mass shooting over there, but Spain already has strict gun control laws, and it didn’t prevent this guy from getting his hands on a gun. It almost makes me think that maybe there is an ulterior motive behind the desire for disarming law abiding citizens,  under the guise of “preventing senseless violence”.

gun control 2.jpg

gun control.jpg


Look, I’m not even a gun nut myself, but I have so little trust in the media or the political establishment anymore that I’m always suspicious of their true intentions behind everything they push for. If they’re pushing for gun control laws when clearly, it doesn’t stop dangerous people like this latest terrorist from getting their hands on one, it naturally makes me suspicious that they have sinister reasons for doing so.

Supermarket employees said he fired at least six shots during the terrifying ordeal.

One employee said the man, who was standing just a few metres from him, yelled “Allahu Akbar”, which translates to “God is greatest”.

But we still can’t be sure of his motive. Maybe he was just delusional from mental illness and yelled those words at random, without actually understanding what he was saying. He’s the real victim here.

Police arrived at the scene to arrest the attacker.

One witness told local media: “Agents came out with a vest shouting and pushing the people.”

Officer Carlos Perez, who was already at the supermarket, revealed he was fired at when he tried to stop the attack.

The 38-year-old revealed the attacker was only apprehended after his colleagues arrived.

He said: “I had the impression that he ran out of ammunition.”

It is believed no shoppers were injured during the attack. 

Well at least nobody was hurt. That’s a nice change.

Local media reported that the attacker had been living in the area for six months and had previously shopped in the supermarket.

The 35-year-old has been taken to a local police stations but refuses to speak to officers and shows no sign of remorse, according to insiders. 

Probably his mental illness is preventing him from understanding the gravity of his actions. He can’t be held responsible, and should probably be released back into society, rather than being imprisoned. It would be inhumane to imprison a mentally ill man.

Police sources told local media the gunman, who has been previously arrested, is believed to have psychological problems. 

Sure, didn’t I call it? Didn’t even have to read the full article, and I knew they’d blame it on his psychological state. They’re so predictable.

The supermarket remained cordoned off while investigators questioned employees and witnesses.

I also wouldn’t be surprised if they also threatened them into keeping their mouths shut about what happened.

Wise words indeed.


Idiotic invaders migrate to Libya…from Libya.

Does it make me a monster that I couldn’t help but laugh when I read this story?

From The Local

After several days at sea the migrants spotted land, thinking it was Italy. Several drowned trying to swim ashore. But when the survivors reached dry land they found they were still in Libya.
What a waste. All that effort trying to invade Europe, only to fail miserably.

The treacherous and ultimately futile journey by 80 mostly Senegalese migrants had begun in Sabratha in western Libya three days earlier, one survivor recounted.

I never knew there was a war happening in Senegal. I guess maybe some of the fighting going on in Libya and Syria spilled over the border, and that’s what they’re fleeing from.

Hmm, nope. The aren’t anywhere near Libya or Syria. I guess they’re just economic migrants, like the vast majority who are coming to Europe currently.

After setting off, the boat was buffeted by rough seas and eventually ran  aground on a beach in Tripoli some 70 kilometres (40 miles) to the east.

“We thought we had already arrived in Italy,” one of the survivors told AFP.

LOL, too fucking bad.

Witnesses said several people had jumped from the boat to try to reach the beach but were unable to swim and drowned.

I just can’t get over how stupid these people are. It’s not as if they fell off the boat and had no choice but to try and swim. They literally jumped off  and tried to swim to shore, despite not being able to, rather than just waiting for the boat to reach land itself. I thought those other idiots who sank their own boat on purpose and drowned were dumb, but at least they did so with the mistaken expectation that the fishing boat they encountered would be forced to rescue them. What excuse to these guys have for jumping into the ocean for no reason, when they can’t even swim?

And the most amazing part of all, is that the media actually tries to convince us with a straight face that these are all highly educated, highly skilled, intelligent people, who will be a great asset to our workforces and our economies. How could anyone be fooled by this nonsense?

“The tragic loss of so many brain surgeons, rocket scientists, and time travel machine engineers.” ~ The way the media acts.

Those who made it to the shore alive included two women — one pregnant – and a child, and they were all in shock.

The pregnant woman sat in tears on the beach next to what was believed to be the body of her brother. She was later hospitalized.

Wow… women and children. That’s definitely something unusual. Glad they survived all the same. Hopefully they, and others like them, will be dissuaded from trying again.

The Libyan Red Crescent said it had recovered the bodies of five passengers from the beach on Wednesday and taken 80 people to shelters.

People-smugglers have exploited the chaos in Libya since the 2011 uprising that overthrew dictator Moamer Kadhafi to traffic migrants in boats to Italy 300 kilometres away.

According to the United Nations, more than 5,000 migrants and refugees died last year while trying to cross the Mediterranean.

I personally blame Angela Merkel and others like her for her blanket invitation to the entire third world to come to Europe and live on welfare. Those deaths could have been avoided, if she hadn’t made such a dangerous journey so tempting. Their on her hands.

On Wednesday, after a riot in a northern Italian migrant centre reignited political debate over how to deal with the migration crisis, ministers said they would try to reach an agreement with Libya. Foreign Minister Angelino Alfano said it was one of three ‘key countries’ whose co-operation was needed to resolve the crisis.

As if that’s really necessary. It can be stopped much more easily, if the Italian navy started stopping boats and dropping the passengers right back where they came from, instead of escorting them all the way back to Europe. That’s really what the problem is. They’ve demonstrated over and over, that all these migrants have to do is get on one of their non-seaworthy boats, and sail a few miles off the coast of Libya and the vast majority of the time, the Italians will pick them up and take them the rest of the way, rather than doing the sane thing and blocking them. If the Italian navy started sending people back, word would eventually get out that they’re no longer welcoming them, and the people leaving war-free countries like Senegal, will no longer have any incentive to attempt this journey. Ergo, unnecessary drownings will be prevented, and Europe would no longer be destroying itself.

Ireland finally starting to take in migrants.


I’m feeling really pessimistic about this news. I really can’t see this turning out well for us, based on what we’ve seen happen in other European countries that have done this.

From Irish Times

A total of 760 refugees had arrived in Ireland by the end of 2016 under the Government’s humanitarian programme for people fleeing conflict in Syria and other war-torn countries in the Middle East and north Africa.

What are these other  “war-torn countries”? Maybe… Tunisia for example?

Remember, if it hadn’t been a Tunisian “refugee” who did the truck massacre, it could just as easily have been a native German, because that truck massacre was predetermined by the universe, and was going to happen no matter what and couldn’t possibly have been prevented by keeping that Tunisian out.

Oh sorry, I forgot. That country isn’t a warzone, but Europe is just accepting “refugees” from there anyway. Same with the likes of Pakistan, Afganistan, Bangladesh, and various sub-Saharan African countries. The majority of so called “refugees” coming into Europe, aren’t fleeing warzones. The only other war-torn countries that people are coming from that I can think of are Libya and Iraq, both of which are sending people to Europe ahead of perfectly safe countries which are geographically closer, and are culturally, religiously, and racially, more similar to them, than the European countries that they are coming to.


Of course this is very easy to figure out why, when you understand what is actually going on. The powers that be don’t give a fuck about the lives of these people. If they did, they would never have supported the policies (ie. unjust and unnecessary wars) which destroyed their countries in the first place, nor would they stand in opposition to the forces of Russia and the Syrian government which are working to clean up the mess. It makes absolutely no logical sense to cause such destruction, and then try to claim an interest in helping these people, by inviting them to come live in Europe on welfare… unless there is an ulterior motive that isn’t so obvious. And that motive, as I’ve always made clear, is the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the European people, by flooding our countries with people who will eventually outbreed, conquer, and exterminate us. It really is that simple.

Never forget about the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan.
They outright state their plans. This was written a couple of years before the Migrant crisis even took off.

The Irish Refugee Protection Programme (IRPP) was a response to the humanitarian crisis in the Mediterranean region caused by the mass exodus of people from conflict zones, especially Syria.

Especially Syria? Funny, because statistics available suggest that about 80% [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] aren’t coming from Syria at all.

How could you possibly say no to these poor Sub-Saharan African men, who are just trying to escape the brutal Syrian civil war?

The Government committed to admitting 4,000 people over three years in a two-strand programme.

Wouldn’t it be better to instead use those three years to work with international organisations to try and end these alleged wars so that there’ll be no need for people to even come here in the first place? I don’t understand why they think these wars will even still be happening in three years time, especially seeing as right now, Russia is starting to pull their forces out of Syria, because the war is  almost over at this point anyway.

The first strand related to displaced people who had fled the civil war in Syria and were living in camps in countries such as Turkey and Lebanon.

Already in safe countries.

These people had already been recognised as refugees and would come to Ireland under a resettlement programme.

Or maybe they can just go back to Syria instead seeing as things are starting to wrap up there.

The second strand covered people arriving in Greece and Italy by sea after fleeing Syria and other countries. They would be relocated to the State, where their asylum applications would be assessed.

Oh yes… the ones coming by sea.

Remember this video? If not, then please make sure to read the comments to get a refresher on what people really think.

A total of 240 have arrived under the second strand, while 520 have come to Ireland under the resettlement strand.

520 more refugees

Minister for Justice Frances Fitzgerald and Minister for Children Katherine Zappone visited Greece in December.

Really? I wonder if she spoke to any of the ordinary Greek people about what the migrants are like? You know, just to get a bit of an insight into what we can expect from them.

Ms Fitzgerald committed to ensuring that 1,100 asylum seekers will have arrived in Ireland by next September. She also committed to bringing in an additional 520 refugees during 2017.

If those targets are met, more than 2,100 people will have arrived in Ireland by the end of this year, approximately half from camps in countries bordering Syria; the other half from Greece and Italy. An estimated third of the refugees will be children 12 and younger.

LOL sure. “Children”. As if they haven’t tried that one before.

Look at all these “Children”.
Or what about this 16 year old boy who is just trying to flee the Ethiopian front of the Syrian civil war.

Under the programme , those arriving in the State are granted international protection within about 12 weeks. Their initial accommodation is temporary, and is known as an Emergency Reception and Orientation Centre (EROC). They are assessed, can avail of language lessons and counselling and receive orientation about their new county. In the medium term, they move on to alternative housing

All paid for by the Irish tax-payer of course. Meanwhile, I can guarantee right now that with all the talk about the housing shortage currently affecting Ireland, that when we eventually do start building more social housing, that these migrants will be first in line to get them, not our own people.

Spread out

The Department of Justice has attempted to distribute the incoming refugees from Syria and elsewhere in as many centres as possible.

For example, about 50 have been accommodated in Portlaoise, 50 in Thurles, 50 in Co Kerry, 50 in Limerick, and 60 in Co Cork. A total of 32 are staying in an EROC at Clonea Strand Hotel in Waterford, and 27 have been accommodated in Mullingar and Athlone. In all, 86 have been relocated and resettled in Mayo, distributed between Castlebar, Westport and Claremorris.

As with direct provisions centres, some EROC facilities have been established in former hotels, which closed during the recession.

Of course, spread them all around the country where they can do maximum damage. Don’t just concentrate them in one area. We all need to be equally “enriched”.

No area can be free from the diversity, and the vast benefits it brings such as terrorism, murders, and gang rape.

I’m just going to call it right now. We’ve seen countless problems occurring all over Europe as a result of this migrant crisis. Terrorism, rapes, all kinds of random violence. Why should we expect that Ireland will be any different? No, we’re going to eventually see similar problems here if they keep this up. The numbers are insignificant right now, but eventually, there will be enough of them for there to be an impact. I really hope that I end up being wrong on this one, but we’ll just have to wait and see.

Four black thugs kidnap and torture a white guy.

We constantly hear in the media about how there is still a very big problem with racism in America. We hear about how all white people benefit from some vague form of “white privilege” that somehow grants them all these undeserved and unspecified benefits that other races (particularly blacks) don’t also benefit from. Then, we also constantly hear that 150 years post slavery, and 50 years post civil rights movement, that white people are still oppressing black people. No evidence for this accusation is ever needed. It’s just repeated over and over again until stupid white people are guilted into believing it must be true. We must be the racist oppressors that the media keeps saying we are. We must be the ones who as a racial demographic, are committing the most violent crime overall, and the most interracial violence must be white on black. Sure, it looks as if blacks commit more crime, but we can’t believe what we’re seeing, because the media disagrees, and they wouldn’t possibly lie to us so blatantly, right? Well actually… they would.


Meanwhile, those of us in the world of reality understand that the exact opposite is true. The reality is that most violent crime in the United States is committed by young black men, and this is even despite the fact that blacks make up about one fifth of the population percentage as whites.

Shaun King (real first name, “Jeffery”) is a white guy who pretends to be black by the way.  If he can’t even tell the truth about what race he is, why should we trust anything else he says?

This is what has been happening the entire time. The vast majority of interracial crime in the United States for the past few decades has been black on white, but the media has always made a habit of deliberately trying to cover this uncomfortable truth up and minimising any coverage of these crimes, while at the same time, taking the rare stories were the opposite happens (white on black violence) and making them international sensations that get attention for months, even years after happening. For a long time, these lies have worked, and the majority have believed them. However, I really can’t see any way that they can lie about this one. It’s just too blatant that even the the big lie technique can’t cover it up.

Unfortunately, the original video is now gone, due to YouTube’s policy on graphic content, but let me summarise what happened. Four idiotic black thugs, kidnapped a young white man with special needs, tied him up, taped his mouth, and uploaded a livestream to Facebook (like I said, they’re idiots), footage of themselves beating him, cutting him with a knife, and forcing him to drink toilet water, all while yelling “Fuck Donald Trump” and various slurs against white people. In other words, the attack was racially motivated, and therefore fits the definition of a “hate crime” under American laws. Certainly, if the opposite had happened (ie. four white thugs doing the same thing to a black guy), the media would be up in arms about it.

Here are two videos which give some interesting insights into the original video and the hypocrisy of the whole situation.

This is the sort of thing that led to the Trump victory. Make no mistake about it, even though most people are asleep, there are still quite a lot of people who on some level, are worried about the future. They understand that we white people are the most despised race on the planet, and that as our numbers go down, and the numbers of other races goes up in our countries, the more persecution we will face. People can see this and are frightened, because they know that we’re on the way to minority status in our own countries, and that we will be treated far worse as a minority ourselves, than we treat minorities now. We can look at attacks like this one and see a preview of the future facing us. Mark my words, we are being targeted for genocide, and if they can act like this now, when we greatly outnumber them, can you even begin to imagine how bad it will get, when they eventually outnumber us? We only need to look at what happened in Haiti in 1804, Zimbabwe since Mugabe came to power, or South Africa post Apartheid, to see our future.


“The increase in hate crimes are real… in my mind”.

A leading member of the Muslim community in Lancashire in Britain has come out and claimed that there has been an increase in the number of hate crimes against his community since Brexit. This is in direct contradiction to the actual statistics available, which suggest the exact opposite has happened. Nevertheless, we should probably believe him anyway, because it’s not as if people ever lie about this sort of thing… except for all those countless times in the past that they have.


From Lancashire Telegraph

‘There is an atmosphere of fear of intimidation’ – Community leader speaks out about concerns that hate crimes are not being reported

HATE crime is still being largely underreported in the region, according to a prominent community leader.

How can he be sure that the number of hate crimes are “underreported” if they’re not being reported? It’s kind of like the whole “If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” scenario. If hate crimes are not being reported, then how can he be so certain that they’re even happening?

“The tree does make a sound, because a Neo-Nazi, white supremacist, Islamophobe committed an unreported hate crime… or something to that effect.

The message from Lancashire Council of Mosques chairman Abdul Hamid Qureshi comes as the latest figures show reported incidents of hate crime have fallen in East Lancashire and the county as a whole since the controversial EU Referendum result in June.

Meanwhile, the number of fake hate crimes are greatly increasing since both Brexit and Trump’s election victory.

This happens a lot.

But Mr Qureshi said that was not a true reflection of the situation and said it would only get worse, especially for Muslims, in the wake of terrorism incidents such as the Berlin truck attack.

  • Muslim terrorists keep murdering European people who were kind enough to allow them into their countries.
  • Europeans keep turning the other cheek and virtue signalling about how it’s “Not all Muslims”.
  • European countries keep flooding themselves with more Muslim migrants.
  • More Muslim terrorists, murder more European people.
  • Muslims are the real victims in all this apparently.

Mr Qureshi encouraged victims of hate crime to contact the police or the third party reporting centre Resolve, based at 9a Town Hall Street, Blackburn.

While I disagree with the concept of “hate crimes” in general (because I believe that there shouldn’t be a victimhood hierarchy, were some victims are treated as if they suffer more than victims of another demographic from the exact same type of crime), I do think that crimes should be reported to the proper authorities.

He said: “I think the reason it is falling is because people still don’t feel confident coming forward and the third party reporting helpline is still in its fairly early stages.

“I think”

No evidence, just talking from his feelings.

happen to think that the real reason why there are so few hate crimes being reported, is because there are so few actually happening for real.

Also, isn’t it funny that there seems to be plenty of people feeling confident enough to report fake hate crimes, and they’re always believed by the media, until their fake story inevitably falls apart, but these alleged victims of real hate crimes apparently lack the same confidence to report their alleged real experiences, stories which shouldn’t fall apart under scrutiny?

“No, she didn’t lie. The racist, white supremacist cops just refused to believe her.”

“But those figures don’t reflect what is really going on, especially for Muslims. There is an atmosphere of fear of intimidation. That only gets worse when there are terrorist attacks. At the moment there is an increasing problem of Islamophobia, with women becoming an increasing target.”

Wow, if Europe is such a horrible, scary place for Muslims, then why do so many of them want to live here at all? Wouldn’t they feel a lot safer and less intimidated, living in a Muslim majority country, without all those scary European people to intimidate them?

Also, I think it’s very interesting that he brings up women specifically. What’s the worst thing that Muslim women have to experience from European people? Maybe some mean looks, or comments about what they’re wearing. On the other hand, lets look at what European women have to experience from Muslims.




And this piece of shit has the audacity to talk about the suffering of “the women”. What about the suffering of OUR mothers, sisters, wives, daughters etc., who have been victimised by YOUR community, after we graciously invited you into OUR homelands? Fuck you, you worthless piece of shit.

The statistics, obtained by the Lancashire Telegraph via a Freedom of Information request, show the figures initially rose in East Lancashire in July following the previous month’s referendum from 87 to 93. But in August there were 66, 69 in September, 53 in October and just 35 in November.

It was a similar picture in the county overall with a rise from 241 in June to 248 in July. They then fell throughout the rest of the year from 193 in August, to 184 in September, to 161 in October and to 139 in November.

A police spokesman said: “Hate crime in any form is wrong. That is why it is important that if hate crime happens to you or someone you know, that you report it. Sometimes you may feel that the incident is too minor to bother the police but reporting it makes a difference – to you, your friends, and your community.

I’d also bet that most victims of actual hate crimes in Britain are Polish, seeing as there seems to be this weird thing, were racists hate all foreign people, but they’re too scared of being exposed as racists, so they take out their hatred on Polish people specifically, because in their heads, it isn’t racist, as Polish people are white. At least, that’s how it looks to me. It’s the only explanation that I can think of that makes sense as to why Polish people are always singled out, in a country in which there are other outsiders who have integrated far worse than they have.