“ISIS apologised for attacking us”.

There are only two relevant sides in the Syrian civil war. There is the legal Syrian government, led by Bashar al-Assad. Then there are the terrorist groups, of which, ISIS is the largest and the most infamous. Now we’re all well aware of the kind of atrocities that ISIS have been committing. There are plenty of stories and videos of them beheading western hostages, throwing gay men off the top of buildings, destroying irreplaceable ancient Roman era artefacts, taking women as sex slaves, claiming responsibility for the epidemic of terrorist attacks happening all across Europe, etc. Yet despite all this, Western policy and Western media seems more interested in demonising Assad, a popular, secular, and democratically elected ruler, rather than ISIS, even though Assad is fighting against them. I’ve discussed the stupidity of the narrative surrounding Assad in this post here already.

Now if you have any critical thinking skills, you might ask yourself, “Why is this happening?”. Lets assume that Assad really is guilty of the atrocities that the West claims that he is guilty of (and just for the record, I don’t actually think he is guilty of them at all). Well, if atrocities are the reason why the West is so opposed to him, then surely ISIS have him beat in that regard, even if he really did do all the things that they’ve accused him of. There’s no logical reason to go after Assad for “committing atrocities”, while ignoring the much larger list of atrocities committed by his opponents. If atrocities were the only concern, then the logical thing to do would be to deal with the greater evil (ISIS) first, bring the Syrian civil war to an end, and then when that is done, present any evidence of Assad’s alleged atrocities to the UN Security Council and his Russian allies, and negotiate his removal this way instead.

So when you realise that there is no logical reason behind the “Assad needs to be removed because he commits atrocities” narrative, there must instead be another explanation. One of the explanations I’ve heard put forward is that the west actually supports ISIS, because Assad is allied with Iran (Israel’s greatest enemy), and taking out Assad will help isolate Iran, and therefore strengthen Israel’s position in the region. This theory is also confirmed by Wikileaks. However, you would understandably then ask the question “Why would Israel support ISIS? Aren’t they the enemies of the Jews?”

Well, going by this story taken from The Times of Israel itself, apparently not.

From Times of Israel

Former defense minister Moshe Ya’alon on Saturday said the Islamic State terrorist group in the Syrian Golan Heights “apologized” for attacking an Israeli unit.

“There was one case recently where Daesh opened fire and apologized,” Ya’alon said, using the terror group’s Arabic nickname.

Just think about this logically. Why would ISIS apologise for attacking Israeli forces, if they were enemies of Israel? They fight against the Assad forces in Syria, against Iran, and Hezbollah, all of whom are enemies of Israel. So in other words, ISIS fights the enemies of Israel, but when they accidentally attack Israeli forces, they apologise. I think it’s pretty obvious what this suggests.

isis-jew.jpg

This was an apparent reference to a clash that took place near the Syrian border last November, in which IDF troops exchanged fire with members of the Islamic State affiliate. After a brief gun battle, the Israeli military attacked the terrorist group with airstrikes and tank fire, killing four of them.

Wow, they actually killed four of them? That makes a change. Normally, they’re treating their wounds.

israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu-next-to-a-wounded-mercenary-israeli-military-field-hospital-at-the-occupied-golan-heights-border-with-syria-18-february-2014.jpg
Netanyahu himself, shaking hands with one of them. For all we know, this guy may have gone on to murder plenty of innocent people after he was healed.

Israel and much of the Western world considers the Islamic State affiliate in the Syrian Golan Heights, known as the Khalid ibn al-Walid Army, to be a terrorist group. Communication with them is technically illegal under Israeli law, constituting contact with an enemy agent.

“Technically illegal”

It won’t actually matter in practicality though.

Ya’alon was speaking at an event in the northern city of Afula. He was interviewed on stage by Eli Levi, a Channel 10 news correspondent.

His comment about the Islamic State’s apology was made as part of a broader point about Israel’s policy for Syria, which is largely non-interventionist.

LOL, non-interventionist, sure.

Screen Shot 2017-04-26 at 00.03.07Screen Shot 2017-04-26 at 00.03.49Screen Shot 2017-04-26 at 00.04.19Screen Shot 2017-04-26 at 00.05.06

You’re not fooling anyone.

Ya’alon was explaining that Israel carries out strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces in retaliation when spillover fire hits the Israeli Golan Heights.

Golan Heights is actually internationally recognised Syrian territory, that has been illegally occupied by Israel since 1967. If they don’t want to get hit by any “spillover fire”, then they should just hand back the territory that they stole.

Ya’alon’s officer refused to elaborate on how exactly the Islamic State expressed its apology to Israel after the attack. The IDF also declined to comment.

I don’t think we’ll be getting an answer any time soon either. Something tells me that this isn’t the kind of thing he was supposed to say publicly.

Syrian officials have accused Israel of directly aiding the Islamic State and other rebel groups, a claim Jerusalem vociferously denies.

Yet we’re supposed to believe that ISIS just apologised for attacking Israeli forces, because they’re nice guys and didn’t mean to do so.

Lets really analyse the magnitude of what this all means. ISIS have claimed responsibility for pretty much every terrorist attack that has happened in the Western world the past few years. I’m not saying necessarily that they actually are responsible for them all, but the point is that they clearly support them all. Israel, which is supposedly the great ally of the Western world is supporting ISIS, because ISIS is useful to them.

Israel cares more about its own geo-political goals, than about the lives of people lost to ISIS terrorism. In addition to not caring about the atrocities they commit, Israel is also prolonging the Syrian war by supporting ISIS, which therefore prolongs the migrant crisis destroying Europe. While this war is being prolonged, Israeli NGO’s are even helping migrants get into Europe, but not into Israel, because they consider them a cancer. This shows them as the hypocrites they are. Jews have overwhelming influence in the media in much of the Western world (particularly in America), and have been the ones cheerleading for these destructive immigration and warmongering policies. Jews have been the biggest supporters of mass third world immigration to the first world (except in Israel of course). Jews have been the primary promoters of white guilt and stirring up racial hatred against us. They were the primary force behind the scourge of Communism.

Therefore, I think it’s safe to say that when you combine this latest story about them clearly working with ISIS, with everything else, that they are proving the antisemites rights about them. They are proving that they are no friend or ally to us at all. They are in fact the greatest threat facing us. Just think of it this way. They have been expelled from where they were living 109 times that we know of from recorded history. Are we really supposed to believe that all 109 times, that they were just innocent victims of irrational hatred, and never deserved what happened? Or, is it possible that they were causing problems for their host society, and the expulsion was just a backlash against them for all the trouble they were causing? Surely, 109 different groups, separated by both geography and history, can’t all have been irrational, hate filled bigots, right?

Huffington Post were made fools of.

A little under a week ago, I wrote a response post to an article published by the Huffington Post, in which the author, a self described feminist, called for the “temporary” disenfranchisement of white males , supposedly in the name of “equality” and “progress”.

Shelley_Garland_findes_ikke.jpg
It’s almost too infuriating to be true. And sure enough, it isn’t true at all.

The article attracted a massive backlash online, to the point were the Huffington Post deleted the original article (archived here), and used the original link to the article to re-direct to this response.

Huffington Post SA has removed the blog “Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?” published on our Voices section on April 13, 2017.

We have done this because the blog submission from an individual who called herself Shelley Garland, who claimed to be an MA student at UCT, cannot be traced and appears not to exist.

 

We have immediately bolstered and strengthened our blogging procedures that, until now, have operated on the basis of open communication and good faith. From now on, bloggers will have to verify themselves.

 

We will hold discussions on putting in place even better quality controls.

In addition, we note the commentary on the content of the blog post and will submit it to the South African Press Ombudsman Joe Thloloe for his analysis of the opinion we carried.

 

Huffington Post SA stands aligned to the Constitutional values of South Africa, particularly the Preamble of our Constitution which states that: “We the people of South Africa believe that South Africa belongs to all who live in it, united in our diversity.”

 

We further understand that universal enfranchisement followed a long struggle and we fully support this.

In addition, Huffington Post South Africa is a signatory to and supporter of the South Africa Press Code. We support free expression as limited by the following value as set out in that code.

5. Discrimination and Hate Speech

5.1. Except where it is strictly relevant to the matter reported and it is in the public interest to do so, the media shall avoid discriminatory or denigratory references to people’s race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth or other status, nor shall it refer to people’s status in a prejudicial or pejorative context.

5.2. The media has the right and indeed the duty to report and comment on all matters of legitimate public interest. This right and duty must, however, be balanced against the obligation not to publish material that amounts to propaganda for war, incitement of imminent violence, or advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion, and that constitutes incitement to cause harm.

We apologise for the oversight. We welcome further discussion. Please email blogs@huffpostsa.com.

The thing is, I don’t think they were actually sorry at all. This was purely done as a matter of self-preservation. At one point in my response to the article, I made this comment about it.

The more I read on, and see how ridiculous it is, the more I start to think it’s a satirical article, just to annoy people like me. Then again, the Huffington Post really has been terrible in the past, so it probably is real. At the very best, the article might have been submitted by a troll, and isn’t intended seriously, but the Huffington Post still published it, so at the very least, they approve of its message, serious or not.

And it turns out, the article really was satirical in nature. It was actually written by a South African, White man, with the express purpose of proving a point. The idiots at the Huffington Post, so blinded by their hatred of white men, were happy to publish an article that fit their narrative, without any regard for fact checking, discrimination laws, or even if the article was written by a real person. The details behind his motivation for doing what he did can be read here.

Some relevant extracts:

“I just thought you can say almost anything you want . . . not necessarily attacking white men. I think there is a lack of fact-checking in South African journalism. I thought, would it work?

.

.

.

Roodt explained he didn’t target HuffPost specifically and that his main motivation was “the lack of fact-checking in journalism”. He also identified a few stories published by South African media which he believes are inaccurate and which served as his motivation.

.

.

.

He says his blog – which promoted the idea that white men are the cause of a lot of societal malaise and should therefore be denied voting rights – might have been too aggressive or angry. Roodt, however, argues both white and black South Africans tend to generalise about other groups and that these generalisations often go unchecked.

.

.

.

Roodt says he believes the resultant furore might lead to a debate in society about race relations and journalistic ethics. This, he added, was a good thing.

So there you have it. A white South African man creates a fake profile, submits a satirical article to it that is highly discriminatory in its message towards white men, and the Huffington Post happily publishes it, without any regard for the accuracy of the information contained, or the highly offensive nature of it. To think, that there are actually people out there who think this a real news source. It’s nothing more than Buzzfeed tier, garbage of the highest degree.

15032183_10206926117144764_8941452048802207631_n

zpctfb

meme22

Anyone who thinks this organisation is trustworthy needs help.

Moroccan man in Belgium pushed too far by “racism”.

wgl58Qy.jpg
Buddhists do it better.

The Western world is a festering pit of racism, white supremacy, and bigotry. If you don’t believe me, then just read the Fake News Mainstream Media, or ask any Marxist humanities professor at your nearest Communist re-education centre University. They’ll confirm this is 100% accurate, without any regard for such trivialities as “evidence” or “truth”, which are racist concepts invented by white supremacists, in order to oppress “people of colour”. Unfortunately, living under this constant racism became too much for one poor Moroccan man, eventually causing him to snap under the pressure, and set himself on fire.

From Morocco World News

Saying he was “sick of racism,” a 38-year-old-man set himself on fire in the town of Kortrijk, in Belgium on Tuesday.

Ahead of the incident, the man, identified on social media as Chafik Hanchi, posted a video online. In it he declared his intent and said he was “sick of racism.”

This poor man, kidnapped from Morocco against his will, and forced to live among racist white people. If only they hadn’t taken him from his homeland, and refused him the right to return home. That must be what happened, right? If the racism he was experiencing was so terrible, he surely would have returned to his homeland willingly, if that was an option for him. He must have been a prisoner in Belgium. He couldn’t possibly have been there by his own free choice.

168774094.jpg
What kind of person would choose to leave this paradise willingly?

According to Russian-owned RT Television, on Tuesday, he left the town’s courthouse and returned some time later carrying a gasoline canister.  Stopping in a square just 15 metres from the courthouse entrance, the video shows him pouring gasoline and setting it alight.

He then pours more on to his jacket and lights that. Seconds later he is seen rushing toward fire fighters and paramedics who were already on scene. He was taken to hospital with severe burns to 35 percent of his body.

This is a really harrowing and tragic story. I actually feel sick reading it. That poor jacket didn’t deserve such a fate.

1383170743801.jpg
What a tragedy. No jacket deserves this.

Police are investigating possible motives for what they are calling an “act of desperation.”

If I was to guess, it was a publicity stunt that went too far. They literally say in the story that fire fighters were already present at the scene, before he even set himself on fire. If he really wanted to kill himself, why would he set himself on fire, while fire fighters are nearby, and then run towards them, unless he was doing so with the expectation of being saved? Sorry “Chafik”, but I reckon “Allah”, being all powerful and all knowing, can tell the difference between a genuine martyr, and a faker like you. No 72 virgins for you just yet.

According to Jamal Qnioun, head of People Help People organization and member of the Council for International Coexistence in Kortrijk, Hanchi sent him a video prior to the incident, threatening self-immolation. He also sent him a number of text messages where he talked about being “sick of racism” and that he felt he could no longer go on living.

Returning to Morocco of course wasn’t an option. He was forced to live there against his will, under this racism. Those damn Belgian people just wouldn’t let him go home, so his only option was to set himself on fire in front of fire fighters who would easily save him before he died.

e2cc435b2ef671e59a76d3d9b4ca4d3e.jpg
Clearly, not much has changed in the last 60 years or so. This poor man must have been experiencing a similar fate as this girl here.

Hanchi had been suffering immense personal street brought about by the recent lost of his father.

Probably murdered by racist white people.

He was also experiencing financial trouble.

Probably caused by racist white people.

He had, at one time, operated a hair salon in the town but was forced to shut down after inspectors discovered an undocumented employee working there.

The inspectors were probably racist white people.

According to Qnioun, Hanchi paid the fine and re-opened a new salon on the same street, only to face another inspection just days later.

So does that mean the second inspection found another violation then? It’s racist to expect this guy to pass these inspections like any other salon owner, don’t you know?

Another video, posted on a separate Facebook account, shows Hanchi complaining about trouble he was having with the national security office.

He was probably the one causing them trouble.

Again, he said he was “tired of racism.” Qnioun expressed concern on social media after the event over what he calls the “harsh conditions” faced by immigrants in Kortrijk.

So harsh… yet they continue to come to Europe by the millions. I wonder why that is?

5340551651_fbf16a2b3c
A real mystery on our hands here.

If I didn’t know better, I would guess that Europe is far superior to the countries that they originate from. But who am I to speculate? If this man says the racism is unbearable here, then we should probably just assume that it’s true, and cry about how guilty we are for having white skin. It’s the right thing to do. It’s our fault that poor jacket was lost.

The tragic story of a jacket lost because of racism.

“ALLAHU AKBAR, I HATE WHITE PEOPLE”

Well who could have possibly seen something like this happening? A black Muslim in California, went on a shooting spree, yelling Allahu Akbar, and that he “hates white people”,  and managed to kill three white people in the process. This is so shocking, because as we all know, Islam is a religion of peace, and black people are usually the victims of violent crimes at the hands of white people, rather than the other way around. The media tells us these things, and we should trust them, because it’s not as if they ever normally lie.

b647a39207fad608bf3553f9e6777cab.jpg

From The Sun

THREE people are reported to have died after a mass shooting in California.

This might sound bad, but in the case of California, I find it very hard to feel too much sympathy. These are some of the stupidest people in the Western world.

This is a state full of people who wanted to secede from America, because Trump won. Yeah, I’m still pretty annoyed at Trump for his actions in Syria, but this state full of idiots blindly hated him on everything and wanting to separate from the rest of the country entirely, because the election didn’t go their way, just seems pathetic to me. I certainly don’t take any pleasure in what has happened, but I can’t say that I’m particularly broken up in this situation either. It’s a bit like in Sweden, where it’s kind of expected really for having such libtarded voting patterns.

Local media reports claim a gunman opened fire before reloading his large handgun and continuing to randomly spray bullets in the city of Fresno.

A 39-year-old suspect is now reported to be in custody, according to the Fresno Bee.

The shooting is said to have occurred outside the offices of the Catholic Charities social service agency.

OMG MUST BE ONE OF THOSE DAMN CATHOLIC TERRORISTS AGAIN!!!!

aattp-gun-preist-.jpg
“Praise Jesus, heretic, or I’ll blow your head off”.

Oh wait, that doesn’t ever happen.

Police Chief Jerry Dyer told the news site two of the victims may have been clients of the agency, while a third was an employee of a gas and electric company.

Witnesses claimed the gunman sprayed rounds while reloading and swearing.

One man was reportedly shot to death at the scene, while a second is said to have died after being ruched to a local medical centre.

The media will probably blame guns again. Guns need to be banned. Then when they start using trucks to kill people instead, trucks will need to be banned. Then eventually, when there are no potential weapons left, and Muslim terrorists start killing people with their barehands, hands will have to be banned.

download.jpeg
Unfortunately, this terrorist here, without any hands to kill infidels with, started biting people to death, before eventually being apprehended. Better ban teeth next.

The suspect, named as Kori Ali Muhammad, walked down the road, firing 16 rounds at random people and vehicles, ABC7 reports.

“Kori Ali Muhammad”

Must be a Buddhist.

Muhammad is suspected of fatally shooting a security guard at a motel in the same city on Sunday.

And Dyer said he was found in possession of the same kind of ammunition when he was arrested, although the weapon is yet to be recovered.

He said it was “still too early” to know what the motivation for the shootings was.

A guy with the last name “Muhammad” goes around shooting people, and they wonder what his motivation could be. Sure isn’t it obvious?

Mental illness, of course. Just like every other time this happens.

But he revealed the alleged shooter told cops he hated white people, according to AP.

All three of the victims were white males.

Of course this doesn’t count as a hate crime, because white people (especially males) have all the power and privilege in the world. We can’t be the victims of hate crimes or racism. The Jews pretending to be white themselves, told us so.

jew-mask.jpg
“No, fellow Goy… um…I mean… white man, this isn’t an act of racism, because only WE have the institutional power to be racist. This black Muslim man was just lashing out because of all the racism that he experienced at our hands.”

Dyer also revealed Muhammad shouted “Allahu Akbar” before the killing, the news agency reported.

“Motivation still unclear”.

The chief told the Fresno Bee: “What we know is that this was a random act of violence.

Yeah…

“Random”

“There is every reason to believe he acted alone.”

He probably did. It doesn’t matter though. There’s still going to be plenty more like him, also “acting alone”. The entire ideology is to blame.

Officials are working to identify the victims.

Oh, who cares about them? They’re just white males. Sure if they hadn’t been murdered, they probably would have just committed suicide anyway, and that’s a good thing.

Literally laughing because an increasing number of white males are committing suicide. And they wonder why their party lost in the election.

Huffington Post writer ~ “Lets ban white men from voting”.

An anti-white male article?

On the Huffington Post?

Wow, who would have ever seen that coming?

From Huffington Post

Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.

How dare these white men vote in favour of their demographic interests? That’s racist and sexist. But if women or racial minorities vote as a bloc for their demographic interests, that’s “progressive”.

If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world.

Just long enough to make sure the damage is done, and that they’ll be powerless to reverse it by then anyway.

events-haitian-revolution-1791-1804-black-slaves-attack-whites-wood-CP404M.jpg
And then once they’re powerless and disenfranchised, this will start happening… AGAIN.

The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008.

Yeah, “white males” did that.

Jewish-Bankers.jpg

Or how about that non-pictured above “white male”, Richard Fuld, who was the chairman of Lehman Brothers, before it collapsed, and dragged the world down with it.

This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed. 

I think that ship has already sailed…

skirts-rape-march-men.jpg

BILD.JPG

da28cd20fec1e007beafa695f4c12ee6a9fbb9e3760972c93f200322d05dc1b8.jpg

red-high-heels-rose-barracks-vilseck-germany.jpg

post-11155-044029400 1334577519_thumb.jpg

db00db762fe81e89ae43d8aa0331dddc_pajama-boy-memes-memesuper-pyjama-boy-meme_500-375.jpeg

Yeah, not really seeing much “toxic masculinity” from white men these days.

At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners. After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism.

Yeah, those “white men” again, are the ones responsible for that.

ClintonDonors90.jpg

billionaires.jpg

rothy.jpg

Untitled-1.png
Source

A period of twenty years without white men in the world’s parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared. The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.

Yes, because the redistribution of wealth has never led to violence, when it has been tried in the past.

36d6ee74490bf20e9b54b75a372a6908.jpg
The real violence is all that wealth that “white males” own.
 This redistribution of the world’s wealth is long overdue, and it is not just South Africa where white males own a disproportionate amount of wealth. While in South Africa 90 percent of the country’s land is in the hands of whites (it is safe to assume these are mainly men), along with 97 percent of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, this is also the norm in the rest of the world.
I’ve dealt with South Africa already.

No need to repeat myself.

Namibia has similar statistics with regard to land distribution and one can assume this holds for other assets too. As Oxfam notes eight men control as much as wealth as the poorest 50 percent of the world’s population. In the United States ten percent of the population (nearly all white) own 90 percent of all assets

It’s always funny how Jews are “white” when they do something bad, or are disproportionately over-represented in something good, but they quickly revert to their Jewish identity, whenever they want to claim victimhood.  If I didn’t know better, I’d suspect that they were looking to pawn off the blame for their wrongdoings on another group.

– it is likely that these assets are largely in the hands of males. Although statistics by race are difficult to find from other parts of the world, it is very likely that the majority of the world’s assets are in the hands of white males, despite them making up less than 10 percent of the world’s population.

Might have something to do with the fact that most of the really successful countries in the world, such as those of Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand, were built by white males, and white people are still the majority demographic in these countries. But don’t worry, if Zimbabwe, Haiti, and South Africa are any indication of things to come, these countries won’t be so successful for much longer.

It is obvious that this violent status quo will not change without a struggle, and the only way to do so will be through the expropriation of these various assets and equitably distribute them to those who need them.

The mindset of people like this is astounding. How exactly is this status quo “violent”? Who exactly is experiencing “violence”? This is what they always do. It’s the same tactic utilised by those Antifa scum, whenever they brutally attack people for having political opinions they disagree with. They classify non-violent acts, words, or in this case, situations, as being violent, in order to justify their own acts of actual violence (when they eventually happen), as being “self defence” against the “violence” that they claim they are experiencing from their target. It’s insane, but that’s just how these Communist thugs operate. It’s all about conditioning people over time to perceive things a certain way, by using certain language and repeating it over and over until it sinks in.

montreal4march.jpg
The Antifa guys, kicking the guy on the ground, aren’t the violent ones. They’re just engaging in self defence against the violent political opinions of this man.
South-Africa.jpg
The black South Africans aren’t the violent ones, when they brutally murder white South Africans. They’re just engaging in self defence against the violence of the white South Africans, by having more success than them.
This will not only make the world a more equitable place, but will also go some way to paying the debt that white males owe the world. Over the past 500 years colonialism, slavery, and various aggressive wars and genocides, have been due to the actions of white men. Redistributing some of their assets will go some way to paying the historical debt that they owe society.

Besides the fact that it’s completely unjustifiable to hold people collectively responsible for the sins committed by people in the past (why should I for example, be held responsible for Colonialism, when I wasn’t even born when it happened?), it also ignores the fact that all these sins, colonialism, slavery, aggressive wars, and genocides, have been practiced by all races. In the case of colonialism, to name a few examples, we have the Empire of Japan, the Inca Empire, the Aztec Empire, The Ottoman Empire, and The Mongol Empire (the last two of which even colonised white lands).

64886-004-2353B724
Oh look at that, The Turkish Ottoman Empire colonised white lands in Europe.
Mongol_Empire-largest.png
Same with the Asian Mongol Empire. Where’s my reparations from Turks and Mongolians?

Wars and slavery have been practiced by every culture that has ever existed, but only white people willingly put an end to slavery (even having to use their power in the world to force its abolition on other races that practiced it). In the case of genocides, we have examples such as the Jewish bolshevik led Holodomor (the victims of which, were white), the Turkish led Armenian and Greek Genocides (again the victims being white), and the black led Rwandan Genocide, just to name a few examples. It’s ridiculous to hold all white people collectively responsible for historical crimes committed by other white people, but not holding members of other races to the same standards. But of course, this isn’t about justice. It’s just purely racial hatred towards white people.

It is no surprise that liberalism – and its ideological offshoots of conservatism and libertarianism – are the most popular ideologies among white males. These ideologies with their focus on individuals and individual responsibility, rather than group affiliation, allow white men to ignore the debt that they owe society, and from acknowledging that most of their assets, wealth, and privilege are the result of theft and violence.

Most of our assets and wealth came from theft and violence?

“Citation needed”

Interesting how she complains about white men having political ideologies that focus on individuality, rather than on collectivism. I can guarantee, that if we did develop demographic awareness, and started playing the identity politics game, just like every other racial group does, she’d complain about that as well, for being “racist”. Essentially, we’re damned no matter what we do, because she isn’t a rational person, looking to have a rational discussion, to potentially resolve any perceived injustices (that can even be proven to exist). She’s just a hate filled bitch, who despises everything about us, and nothing less than handing over everything we own to people who aren’t “white males”, and getting down on our knees before them, will ever satisfy her. Even then, it probably still wouldn’t be enough, because we’d still be breathing.

Some may argue that this is unfair. Let’s be clear, it may be unfair, but a moratorium on the franchise for white males for a period of between 20 and 30 years is a small price to pay for the pain inflicted by white males on others, particularly those with black, female-identifying bodies.

The pain that “white males” inflict on “black, female-identifying bodies”.

tumblr_n2i5w0KYgO1qaeo2oo1_500.png
What about the pain that “black males” inflict on “white, female-identifying bodies”?
In addition, white men should not be stripped of their other rights, and this withholding of the franchise should only be a temporary measure, as the world rights the wrongs of the past.

Yeah, sure.

“Temporary measure”

A withholding of the franchise from white males, along with the passing of legislation in this period to redistribute some of their assets, will also, to a degree, act as the reparations for slavery, colonialism, and apartheid, which the world is crying out for to be paid.

The more I read on, and see how ridiculous it is, the more I start to think it’s a satirical article, just to annoy people like me. Then again, the Huffington Post really has been terrible in the past, so it probably is real. At the very best, the article might have been submitted by a troll, and isn’t intended seriously, but the Huffington Post still published it, so at the very least, they approve of its message, serious or not.

As we saw after the recent altercation between a white man and Lebohang Mabuya at a Spur restaurant in Johannesburg, white males still believe that they are in control, and people who aren’t white or male (in particularly black female-identifying people) have to bow to their every whim.

Interesting, lets watch the video of that incident.

Notice how at the very start of the video, the man makes a comment about how his child was hit in the head by one of her children? In fact, this article that has eye-witness accounts from before the recording began, backs up this accusation. He wasn’t being aggressive with the woman because he’s a white man, and she’s a black woman. He was being aggressive, because one of her brats hit his daughter, and she wouldn’t discipline the child. What parent wouldn’t be pissed off in a situation like that? According to this Huffington Post writer, he has no right to stand up for his child, just because he’s a white man, dealing with a black woman.

There are numerous other examples of white angry male violence in South Africa and abroad, often against black bodies (Dylann Roof’s terrorist actions in the United States is only one of many examples).

Dylann Roof is a reasonable case to criticise. Going into a church full of black parishioners and gunning them down, just because of their race, is not acceptable. Of course, it’s still a drop in the ocean compared to the black on white violence, that this woman wouldn’t dream of condemning.

crime_statistics_01.jpg

It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them.

Although this may seem unfair and unjust, allowing white males to continue to call the shots politically and economically, following their actions over the past 500 years, is the greater injustice.

Just repetition of (dumb) points already made earlier in the article. Exactly the kind of writing skill I would expect from a Huffington Post “Journalist”.

German football team bus attacked.

0101af6732728db41ecd4ab7af24fcf36e1d08bbee9cf16a7aed9687fff8bd6a_3
Yet again…

A terrorist attack?

In Germany?

Who could have possibly seen something like that happening?

From BBC

German police have detained a suspect with “Islamist links” following a bomb attack on the bus of the Borussia Dortmund football team.

Damn… and there I was, expecting it would be some blond haired, blue eyed, native German, by the name of Fritz. Maybe next time.

Prosecutors also said the three explosive devices contained metal pieces.

All the better to tear a body apart with.

Two letters claiming the attack on Tuesday evening were being investigated, they said.

Prosecutors are treating the blasts as a terrorist attack but say the precise motive is unclear at present.

Yes, lets not be hasty and make rash judgements. We should probably wait until a proper investigation is done, before making assumptions.

Though I do 100% guarantee that if a white guy had attacked Muslims, they’d instantly assume that it was racially motivated, and the media would have 24/7 coverage about the horrible epidemic of white supremacy and racism.

Chancellor Angela Merkel on Wednesday said the attack was “an appalling crime” and praised the fans of both teams for coming together.

Merkel is responsible for this. She was the one who decided to invite the entire third world to come live in Germany, and it’s no coincidence that the number of rapes and terrorist attacks in Germany have increased ever since. She has to go.

Migrant-crisis-648321.jpg
There is an election soon enough. Hopefully the Germans will see sense and get rid of her.

Fans are arriving at Signal Iduna Park in Dortmund for the rescheduled Champions League quarter-final first-leg, set to kick off at 18:45 local time (16:45 GMT).

Earlier, a spokeswoman for Germany’s federal prosecutor, Frauke Koehler, said: “Two suspects from the Islamist spectrum have become the focus of our investigation. Both of their apartments were searched, and one of the two has been detained.”

I bet they were already well known to authorities, if they were found this quickly. Remind me again, why exactly these monsters are free to live in Europe?

German media are reporting that the suspect detained is a 25-year-old Iraqi, and the second suspect is a 28-year-old German.

“German”

LOL

ac513.jpg
Call it a hunch, but I reckon this “German” suspect, is a bit hairier and darker skinned than this guy. I’d also bet his name isn’t very German sounding either.

The blast radius of the attack was about 100m. Prosecutors said it was lucky the casualties were not worse.

“We’re so lucky that the hostile invaders who are constantly attacking us, and have killed untold numbers already, didn’t do so much damage this time.”

Ms Koehler said a piece of shrapnel had embedded itself in the headrest of one of the seats on the team bus.

Imagine if a person had been sitting in that seat.

She said three copies of the same letter were found near the site of the blasts, indicating that the attacker had links to so-called Islamic State (IS). IS had said it carried out the attack on a Christmas market in Berlin in December that killed 12 people.

ISIS will claim responsibility for every attack committed by a Muslim, whether they’re a member of their organisation or not.

Ms Koehler said the letter demanded “the withdrawal of [German] tornado fighter jets from Syria and, I quote, the closure of Ramstein airbase.”

Ramstein is a significant US Air Force base. The text is being analysed to see if it is authentic.

And then once that is done, they’ll be satisfied, and won’t commit acts of terrorism in Europe anymore.

2531c8f79f820033b65406a27d013869.jpg

The Sueddeutsche Zeitung newspaper said the letter began with the phrase “in the name of Allah”.

But it said it was possible the perpetrators were deliberately trying to mislead the investigation.

Honestly, it is quite possible and all avenues should be investigated before jumping to conclusions. Maybe some far-right, Neo Nazi group, staged the attack, in order to frame Muslims for it.

A second letter was published online, in which left-wing extremist groups claimed to have carried out the attack, but prosecutors had reason to believe this letter was not authentic.

… Or maybe it was just Communist scum instead. As an alternative to a Muslim attack, this is probably the next most likely explanation, seeing as usually, it’s leftist groups like Antifa who are most likely to be behind politically motivated violence. YouTube is full of videos of them attacking people.

What happened on Tuesday evening?

Borussia Dortmund players were on their way to their home Champions League quarter-final first-leg match against Monaco, when three explosive charges detonated, police said.

Spain international Marc Bartra underwent an operation after breaking a bone in his wrist. No other players were hurt, but a police officer on a motorbike escorting the bus suffered trauma from the noise of the explosions.

Several reports said the explosives had been hidden in a hedge.

Dortmund goalkeeper Roman Burki told Swiss news outlet Blick that the bus had turned on to the main road when there was a loud noise.

The players ducked to the floor of the bus, not knowing if there would be more blasts, he said.

Captain Marcel Schmelzer added “we’re all in shock” but their thoughts were with their injured colleague. The 80,000-capacity Signal Iduna Park was later evacuated safely.

Isn’t Germany such an exciting country these days?

Despite the apparent claim of an Islamist motive, the attack does not have much in common with previous such attacks, says the BBC’s correspondent in Berlin, Damien McGuinness.

The explosives were not designed to cause maximum damage in a crowd – or to target the stadium itself, which is several kilometres away.

Maybe they just couldn’t get that far. Or maybe the bus was just their preferred target.

Either left-wing or right-wing extremists could also be to blame.

Perhaps. We’ll just have to see what the investigation turns up.

How have people reacted?

Monaco fans at the stadium were praised for their chants of support for Dortmund.

Social media also carried offers from Dortmund residents to Monaco fans in need of a bed for the night on #bedforawayfans.

Fifa president Gianni Infantino said the football organising body condemned the incident and wished Bartra a “speedy recovery”.

Security is tight for the rescheduled match, with no backpacks being allowed to be brought in to the stadium. Fans were told to arrive early.

“We want to show that terror and hatred can never dictate our actions,” Borussia Dortmund chief executive Hans-Joachim Watzke said.

My guess is that no lesson has been learned here.

Slave markets in Libya.

You know how we’re always told that infinity third world migrants, with no discernible skills or qualifications, and with an average IQ that is comparable to the reading on a thermometer on a mild spring day, will somehow be a massive benefit to our highly technological, first world, European societies? Well, if you’re a regular reader of this blog, you will probably have noticed that I’ve been somewhat skeptical about this claim in the past. Today I am happy to say that I have been proven wrong. These enterprising geniuses have discovered a market niche that will undoubtedly have massive benefits for their economic prospects in Europe. They’ve gotten involved in slave trading.

From BBC

Africans trying to reach Europe are being sold by their captors in “slave markets” in Libya, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) says.

Black people from war-free (albeit impoverished) nations, looking to come live on welfare in Europe and probably rape as many white women as they can find, are getting captured and enslaved by Arab slave traders along the way. No doubt, that white people are the ones to blame, for creating functioning civilisations that attract these people to take these risks in order to reach them.

Victims told IOM that after being detained by people smugglers or militia groups, they were taken to town squares or car parks to be sold.

Migrants with skills like painting or tiling would fetch higher prices, the head of the IOM in Libya told the BBC.

What a tragedy. If these painters and tilers are getting captured and sold by slave traders, then European countries will never see the benefits of their skills. Instead we’ll have to… God forbid… hire native European painters and tilers instead.

Libya has been in chaos since the 2011 Nato-backed ousting of Muammar Gaddafi.

Which is exactly what will have in Syria as well if Assad is taken out. Even if you don’t believe in the possibility of World War 3 breaking out between America and Russia, you have to at least look at the precedent with Libya to see what Syria’s potential future could be.

main-qimg-e750fda434544f9813b6392f35614bca-c.jpeg
And there are actually delusional people who think a similar fate for Syria is a good thing.

Hundreds of young sub-Saharan African men have been caught up in the so-called slave markets, according to the IOM report.

I honestly have no sympathy. After seeing the chaos that sub-Saharan African men have brought to Europe, I really do not care. As far as I’m concerned, they took a chance, hoping to come leech off of European productivity, and it simply didn’t pay off. Not my problem.

Why should anyone in Europe care about the well-being of members of an invading army, looking to plunder our wealth, destroy our infrastructure, and rape our women and children? Fuck them all.

Migrants ‘forced to starve’

A Senegalese migrant, who was not named to protect his identity, said that he had been sold at one such market in the southern Libyan city of Sabha, before being taken to a makeshift prison where more than 100 migrants were being held hostage.

Poor guy, just trying to escape the Syrian civil war that has obviously spread to Senegal.

Screen Shot 2017-04-12 at 15.44.46.png

*sigh*

How gullible can people possibly be, to actually still believe the idiotic “They’re refugees fleeing war” narrative? It couldn’t be a more obvious invasion.

He said that migrants held at the facility were told to call their families, who would be asked for money to pay for their release, and some were beaten while on the phone to allow relatives to hear them being tortured.

This sort of thing will be happening in Europe before long. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if it already is happening.

He described “dreadful” conditions where migrants were forced to survive on limited food supplies, with those unable to pay either killed or left to starve, the report adds.

Oh dear. I guess there’s only one possible solution. We’ll just have to set up migrant processing centres in every single sub-Saharan African country, and fly them all directly into Europe, so they won’t have to risk getting enslaved in Libya on their quest to invade us.  You know, seeing as they’re never going to stop trying to get into Europe, and we’re too paralysed with political correctness to tell them that they aren’t welcome.

Another witness, who was able to raise the funds needed for his release after nine months, was later taken to hospital with severe malnutrition, weighing just 5.5 stone (35 kg).

Women, too, were bought by private Libyan clients and brought to homes where they were forced to be sex slaves, the witness said.

This is hardly anything new of course. North Africa was always historically, a base for Arab slave traders. Not only did they enslave sub-Saharan Africans, but they also launched plenty of raids on Europe for slaves as well.

0.jpg
White people are expected to feel collective guilt for their ancestor’s role in Black African slavery. Nobody expects Arabs to feel collective guilt for their ancestor’s role in white slavery, or in Black African slavery (which was larger than that of white people).

The only reason it was eventually stopped was when Europeans (most notably the French) got sick of the constant slave raids, and conquered and occupied North Africa, so that the slavers would no longer have a base from which to launch attacks on Europe. Again, we’re always told about the evils of colonialism, but in some cases at least, it wasn’t simply motivated by greed or a lust for power. The desire to protect one’s own people (something Europeans have long since forgotten) was sometimes a motivator as well.

The IOM’s chief of mission for Libya, Othman Belbeisi, told the BBC that those sold into slavery found themselves priced according to their abilities.

“Apparently they don’t have money and their families cannot pay the ransom, so they are being sold to get at least a minimum benefit from that,” he said.

“The price is definitely different depending on your qualifications, for example if you can do painting or tiles or some specialised work then the price gets higher.”

An IOM staff member in Niger said they confirmed the reports of auctions in Libya with several other migrants who had escaped.

“They all confirmed the risks of been sold as slaves in squares or garages in Sabha, either by their drivers or by locals who recruit the migrants for daily jobs in town, often in construction.

“Later, instead of paying them, [they] sell their victims to new buyers.”

And again no doubt, Europeans will be the ones to get the blame for all this.

Some migrants, mainly Nigerians, Ghanaians and Gambians are forced to work “as guards in the ransom houses or in the ‘market’ itself”, the IOM employee added.

Nigerians, Ghanaians and Gambians, All just trying to flee the brutal civil war in Syria, and that madman Assad, who gases his own people, including children, for no reason whatsoever.

&NCS_modified=20150824065503&MaxW=640&imageVersion=default&AR-150829633
This mild mannered, well spoken, and highly intelligent, London educated, medical doctor, is so dangerous, that people as far away as sub-Saharn Africa, all need to flee to Europe, to escape his chemical weapons. Yes, people are this gullible.

The organisation has called the emergence of these markets “a disturbing new trend in the already dire situation for migrants in Libya”.

Their situation wouldn’t be so “dire” if they stayed in their home countries, rather than leaving to plunder Europe. People often make the argument that they wouldn’t take such risks, not only the possibility of being enslaved, but also the risk of drowning en route to Europe, unless the situation back home was so bad, that it justified the risks. That’s rubbish when they’re fleeing countries that aren’t experiencing war or any other humanitarian disaster. The reason they take the risk is because they don’t know what they’re getting into, and the lure of living in luxury in Europe, rather than poverty back home, is impossible to resist. There is no evidence to suggest that they are aware of the potential dangers facing them if they make the journey.

In February, the UN children’s agency Unicef released a report documenting – in sometimes horrific detail – stories of slavery, violence and sexual abuse experienced by large numbers of vulnerable children travelling from Libya to Italy.

“Children”

Yeah, forgive me for being skeptical again.

2015
Just look at all those “Children”. Source
2016
Source

The report, A Deadly Journey for Children, said that almost 26,000 children – most of them unaccompanied – crossed the Mediterranean in 2016, many of them suffering abuse at the hands of smugglers and traffickers.

Keep in mind, that as I’ve covered before in previous posts, a lot of these “children” are a lot older than is being claimed.

Tens of thousands of migrants arrived in Italy last year by sea, crossing from North Africa. But before they reach the jumping-off point in Libya, many migrants will have undertaken a perilous journey of up to six days across the Sahara in extreme temperatures.

Yeah… still not finding the will to care here at all.

So there you have it. There’s a war happening in Syria right now. People from sub-Saharan Africa are trying to invade Europe. Stupid people confuse the concept of refugees fleeing the war in Syria, with these Africans trying to invade Europe. Many of these would be invaders are getting enslaved in Libya, a country which was destroyed in similar fashion to what is being attempted in Syria right now. Some of the stupid people who support helping “Syrian refugees” (including these African people who they think are Syrian refugees), are supportive of the idea of America starting a war with Syria and potentially turning it into another Libya in the process.

This is why I have no faith in humanity anymore.