I remember when the first notable example of a Muslim terrorist using a vehicle to kill people occurred in Nice, social media was rife with sarcastic comments about the need to “Ban all trucks” or to introduce “truck control laws”, playing off the comments about gun control, that inevitably follow every single shooting death that occurs in America. The whole point of the comments was to sound absurd as possible, to mock the fact that the media and political establishment will jump through hoops to try to avoid talking about the real issues that lead to these frequent tragedies. The reality is that you can ban guns all you want. It might make things a little more inconvenient for a determined killer, but as the wave of vehicle related terrorist attacks in Europe has shown, they will find other ways. Nobody was ever seriously suggesting that vehicles needed to be banned.
But then Sweden had a terrorist attack, in which a vehicle was the murder weapon of choice…
Cars have turned into deadly weapons. They have been easy to steal and then nothing has been able to stop their advance.
Yep. As I’ve always maintained, I’m no gun nut myself, but I’ve always believed that those who obsess over the “gun control” issue, are completely misguided. People erroneously presume that America has a huge amount of gun violence, solely because of the easy access to guns. But if easy access to guns was the case, then why doesn’t Switzerland have a similar amount of gun violence, and why is it that in America, it has only really become a problem in recent decades? Well, the answer can be found by reading “The Color of Crime”. High gun proliferation isn’t the issue. Diversity is, and as Europe becomes more “diverse”, just as America did a few decades before us, we too are seeing an increase in violent crime. If it isn’t guns, it’s trucks. If it isn’t trucks, it will be something else.
In Nice, Berlin, Jerusalem, London and Stockholm they have been used as effective murder machines terrorists who wanted to kill many people.
Yeah, and who were the responsible parties in each of those situations? It sure wasn’t indigenous, white Europeans, that’s for sure.
If people in the future will be protected cars must simply removed from the collection sites and city centers. It is not reasonable for a big truck can be driven right into Stockholm’s popular walking street on a Friday afternoon just before Easter. Politicians have been good at protecting themselves, but now they must also ensure citizens’ needs for secure environments.
And there you have it. The solution to the recent spate of terrorist attacks involving vehicles? Ban vehicles from city centers. Normal citizens have to have their own rights curtailed, in order to protect them from the invading force that their treacherous elites forced upon, against their will. This is the price we have to pay for the diversity we never even asked for.
Never forget those who were responsible for this. We didn’t ask for multiculturalism. We weren’t consulted about it. We had it inflicted upon us because of some bullshit about how we wouldn’t survive without out (no explanation as to why we wouldn’t survive). Personally, I think we could have survived just fine.
It has been fourteen years ago, a man drove right onto Western Street in Old Town . He killed a woman and injured another 18 people. There were several reasons to protect the medieval city center, but security in the narrow alleys should have been a strong argument. It is indeed remarkable that car traffic soon-still must scroll through the Old Town.
Stockholm is an international city, a tourist city with 13.5 million overnight stays last year. Of the four persons killed at Queen Street were three visitors, one woman from Belgium, a woman from Uddevalla, and a British man.
Don’t forget the fifth victim. The poor, innocent dog.
I honestly feel more sympathy for the poor dog than the people at this point. The people are the ones supporting this insanity, by living in denial about what is actually happening. The dog on the other hand can’t be blamed.
Shopping Street is a popular destination for our visitors and should of course be a safe environment. Many tourists continue down the street to the Old Town, but quite surely it is just around the headquarters and Parliament House. There are stops for unwanted cars that can also be folded down for any significant transport must be developed. The technology there is, but it’s not for everyone.
Sadly, the terrorist didn’t strike the parliament house instead of random passers-by. It wouldn’t be as much of a tragedy if he had.
Most things can be solved for taxi and transportation service. Deliveries to shops and restaurants can also be redirected to the times when fewer people are out walking the streets.
Stockholm’s traffic has always been about flows. Motorists should drive in a steady stream, and nothing will stop them. Now being built also fast cycle paths so that cyclists can flow through the city.
All sounds very complicated and unnecessary. I could suggest a simpler solution. Stop immigration from incompatible people, and deport the incompatible ones who are already there.
More rarely, there is talk of the need for a peaceful environment. If parks and squares friendly welcoming our visitors and where children can move without danger to their lives.
Their lives wouldn’t be in danger anyway if you put a stop to this insane immigration system.
Justice Minister Morgan Johansson believes that it is difficult to protect people in an open society. But motorists may run anywhere is surely not transparent. The cars have dominated our cities for decades, now it is the people who need space. Now it is cars that must be regulated.
“Cars must be regulated”
This is coming from the country that gave us this.
I don’t think I can really add anything more at this point. The sheer stupidity should be obvious to anyone… except this woman.