An anti-white male article?
On the Huffington Post?
Wow, who would have ever seen that coming?
Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.
How dare these white men vote in favour of their demographic interests? That’s racist and sexist. But if women or racial minorities vote as a bloc for their demographic interests, that’s “progressive”.
If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world.
Just long enough to make sure the damage is done, and that they’ll be powerless to reverse it by then anyway.
The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008.
Yeah, “white males” did that.
Or how about that non-pictured above “white male”, Richard Fuld, who was the chairman of Lehman Brothers, before it collapsed, and dragged the world down with it.
This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.
I think that ship has already sailed…
Yeah, not really seeing much “toxic masculinity” from white men these days.
At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners. After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism.
Yeah, those “white men” again, are the ones responsible for that.
A period of twenty years without white men in the world’s parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared. The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.
Yes, because the redistribution of wealth has never led to violence, when it has been tried in the past.
No need to repeat myself.
It’s always funny how Jews are “white” when they do something bad, or are disproportionately over-represented in something good, but they quickly revert to their Jewish identity, whenever they want to claim victimhood. If I didn’t know better, I’d suspect that they were looking to pawn off the blame for their wrongdoings on another group.
Might have something to do with the fact that most of the really successful countries in the world, such as those of Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand, were built by white males, and white people are still the majority demographic in these countries. But don’t worry, if Zimbabwe, Haiti, and South Africa are any indication of things to come, these countries won’t be so successful for much longer.
The mindset of people like this is astounding. How exactly is this status quo “violent”? Who exactly is experiencing “violence”? This is what they always do. It’s the same tactic utilised by those Antifa scum, whenever they brutally attack people for having political opinions they disagree with. They classify non-violent acts, words, or in this case, situations, as being violent, in order to justify their own acts of actual violence (when they eventually happen), as being “self defence” against the “violence” that they claim they are experiencing from their target. It’s insane, but that’s just how these Communist thugs operate. It’s all about conditioning people over time to perceive things a certain way, by using certain language and repeating it over and over until it sinks in.
Besides the fact that it’s completely unjustifiable to hold people collectively responsible for the sins committed by people in the past (why should I for example, be held responsible for Colonialism, when I wasn’t even born when it happened?), it also ignores the fact that all these sins, colonialism, slavery, aggressive wars, and genocides, have been practiced by all races. In the case of colonialism, to name a few examples, we have the Empire of Japan, the Inca Empire, the Aztec Empire, The Ottoman Empire, and The Mongol Empire (the last two of which even colonised white lands).
Interesting how she complains about white men having political ideologies that focus on individuality, rather than on collectivism. I can guarantee, that if we did develop demographic awareness, and started playing the identity politics game, just like every other racial group does, she’d complain about that as well, for being “racist”. Essentially, we’re damned no matter what we do, because she isn’t a rational person, looking to have a rational discussion, to potentially resolve any perceived injustices (that can even be proven to exist). She’s just a hate filled bitch, who despises everything about us, and nothing less than handing over everything we own to people who aren’t “white males”, and getting down on our knees before them, will ever satisfy her. Even then, it probably still wouldn’t be enough, because we’d still be breathing.
The pain that “white males” inflict on “black, female-identifying bodies”.