Pure racism: Former ISIS fighters struggling to get jobs when they return to Europe.

Untitled
No, I’m not making this story up. This is the actual headline.

With ISIS gradually getting crushed in Syria (no thanks to America or their regional allies), being a jihadist is suddenly not so glamorous anymore for a lot of young Muslim men, who joined their ranks in recent years. A lot of them are returning to Europe, and supposedly want a second chance. They’re looking for jobs, but they can’t seem to find anyone willing to employ them, what with the big time gap in their CV, and the whole ‘fighting for a terrorist organisation’ thing hanging over their heads. This makes them sad, and a few of them have decided to share their stories with us.

From Newsweek

The first thing an employer will ask about a resume is any gaps between jobs. But they probably wouldn’t suspect that an applicant for a certain role who seems to have been unemployed for a few years was busy fighting for the Islamic State militant group (ISIS).

I can just picture the interviews now…

unnamed.jpg
“We’re sorry Muhammad, but we have no room at our organisation, for someone with your spotty employment record. I hear they’re currently recruiting for airline pilots though. Do you know how to fly a plane?”

Jihadis returning to their home countries in Europe are now finding out the hard way, and many cannot get a job as they try to reintegrate into western society.

“Jihadis”

“home countries”

“Europe”.

These are three terms that should never be used in the same sentence, unless that sentence is “Jihadis have been deported back to their home countries, from Europe, were they’ll hopefully soon be killed by the Russian military.”

Swedish daily newspaper Expressen interviewed former jihadis about life after ISIS and they discussed the challenges of finding work. As many as 150 have returned to the Scandinavian country to try and rebuild their lives.

Oh what a surprise. Sweden are the ones leading the charge to humanise these worthless sub-human scum. They don’t deserve the chance to rebuild their  pathetic lives. They deserve to be exterminated with extreme prejudice.

b4813aff2136b47130fd5555ae3fcc4d--vlad-the-impaler-fascinating-facts.jpg
Vlad the Impaler figured out the correct way to treat Jihadis, more than 500 years ago.

“I just want to forget everything,” Walad Yousef, a 27-year-old returning fighter, told the newspaper. “I apply for a lot of jobs, but I can’t get any because my pictures are out there.”

Shouldn’t have run off to fight for an organisation that regularly beheads people, commits acts of terrorism in Western countries, including your host nation, throws gay people off rooftops, and takes women as sex slaves then, should you Walad? I’ve no sympathy for you whatsoever. Don’t act as if you didn’t know what you were getting yourself into, when you signed up to fight for those monsters. They don’t even try to hide what they’re all about. You deserve no opportunities and in a sane world (so not Sweden then), you would be arrested, flown back to whichever Islamic hellhole you originally came from, and dropped out of the plane without any parachute. It’s pretty obvious to anyone with common sense (so again, nobody with any power in Sweden), that he probably came back just so he can commit an act of terrorism there.

Yousef had posted images of himself in Syria on Facebook, posing at a training camp with a Kalashnikov, and encouraging friends to join him. He returned to Sweden and said he had only gone to Syria to help civilians in the eastern city of Raqqa, where ISIS has beheaded several western hostages.

The idiot Swedish authorities will probably fall for this obvious lie.

2B5C28E200000578-0-image-a-2_1439555792851
Here’s a picture of Yousef trying to rescue a suicidal man who blindfolded himself, tied his own hands behind his back, and then jumped off a roof. Unfortunately, he couldn’t get there in time to save him.
jihadijj.png
Here’s a picture of Yousef showing his favourite knife to a very short man.

Another returning member said that life under ISIS was “not what I thought” while others said they had only traveled to help civilians affected by the Syrian war.

bullshit-meter.jpg

Employers fear that returning fighters may commit attacks or help others to commit attacks and do not wish to be associated with them, said another returnee who has changed his name to Yousef.

Oh what horrible hate filled bigots those employers must be. How is it that in *current year*, there are still bigots out there, who think it’s perfectly acceptable to discriminate against members of a terrorist organisation?

download.jpg
“Why do they discriminate against us? All we wanted to do was install a global Caliphate, murder the infidels, and enslave their women and children. We’re such victims.”

“You in the media have scared them. I do not know why they are afraid,” said a jihadi from the southern city of Malmo of the fears that employees and civilians had of returning foreign fighters.

Gee, I wonder why people would be afraid of returning jihadists?

maxresdefault
I just can’t figure it out.

Another refused to speak to Expressen and give his real identity as he said he has “enough problems” finding employment in the country.

Maybe your old employer ISIS, might take you back. With all the casualties they’re suffering as of late, I’m sure they’ll be happy to take whatever recruits they can get.

Others said they had no idea why their names were on leaked ISIS records. “That’s very strange. Anyone can say they’re me,” said an unnamed returnee. “I mean, it’s war. Maybe someone recommended me. I don’t know.”

bullshit-meter

Many live at home with their relatives or their friends as they cannot afford accommodation after returning and many have changed their names.

Just as well facial recognition software is improving all the time. You can’t hide forever. You will be exposed eventually.

One of the jihadis named in the Expressen investigation is Bherlin Dequilla Gildo, a 39-year-old from Malmo, a jihadi who posed with the corpse of a Syrian regime soldier. A man answered at his address but said no one was there with that name. But he is back in Sweden, the newspaper says. One of Gildo’s associates who fought alongside him said “he can do anything. Even I am afraid of him.” 

And this guy is walking the streets of Sweden quite freely. Aren’t open borders and multiculturalism just wonderful?

Sweden is one the best countries for a foreign fighter to return if they want to reintegrate. It is trialling a rehabilitation programme that gives Swedish extremists housing, employment, education and financial support. Anna Sjöstrand, the municipal coordinator against violent extremism in the city of Lund, said in October 2016 that it is much cheaper to reintegrate someone than to abandon them.

A lot of free stuff and opportunities that indigenous, law abiding, ethnic Swedes, the ones who actually pay the taxes to fun these programs, don’t get to benefit from. This is something that people need to remember. If you’re a native European (particularly in the likes of Sweden), you’re almost guaranteed to be a second class citizen in your own country, whereas terrorist scum like these guys, will get every opportunity handed to them.

It is unclear if the trial will be rolled out nationwide or how former jihadis are to be reintegrated into the job market when they face such an obvious stigma after being ISIS members.

My guess is that the Swedish government will either incentivise or force employers to hire former ISIS fighters, ahead of native Swedes. In fact, because this is Sweden we’re talking about, I can say that with 99% certainty that this is exactly what will happen.

unnamed
“So Muhammad, I see you’re back again. The government says that we have to hire you, so welcome aboard. I’m sure you’ll make a great security guard for this vulnerable women’s shelter.”

The country suffered only its second radical Islamist attack in April when an Uzbek national plowed a truck into civilians on a busy shopping street in central Stockholm. The attack left five people dead. Authorities arrested the driver and said he had sympathies with ISIS. ISIS did not claim the attack, but it generally does not take responsibility for attackers who are captured alive.

Returning fighters are a problem across the West—security services in Europe and the U.S. are concerned that their nationals will return home to carry out attacks as ISIS’s caliphate continues to crumble in Iraq and Syria.

And here in lies a very important key problem with regards to Western policy. On the one hand, they (claim at least to) increase their attacks on ISIS in the Middle East, ostensibly to stop attacks from ISIS in Europe. Yet at the same time, they have this belief that increasing their pressure on ISIS in the Middle East, causes them to increase their attacks in the West. So a terrorist attack occurs in Europe, and they respond by bombing the Middle East, which they also believe causes more attacks in Europe in retaliation. Meanwhile, they continue to do nothing practical to prevent attacks from happening in Europe, such as having a sensible immigration policy, or deporting known radicals. It’s like imagine if your house was full of cockroaches, so you hired an exterminator, to kill the cockroaches in a house 5 miles away, instead of the ones actually in your own home. It’s just complete insanity.

More than half of Britain’s 800 foreign fighters have returned home. For the U.S., only a few have returned home with a much lower travel rate to Syria and Iraq. Former FBI Director James Comey said in 2016 that just 250 Americans had attempted to go or have gone to Syria. Almost 7,000 have traveled to Iraq and Syria as a whole from the West.

Is anyone else sick of hearing these people actually being referred to as “British” or “American” or whatever? Because I sure am. It isn’t white Europeans or white Americans… the people who actually built these nations, who are going off to Syria and Iraq (well, with one notable exception). It’s people of Arabic, North African, or South Asian descent who are doing so. These are not the indigenous Europeans, nor are they founding demographic of the United States. They are people who we have foolishly welcomed into our homelands, who have taken advantage of our kindness, and then have betrayed us. They aren’t American. They aren’t European. They shouldn’t be referred to as such.

Advertisements

Trump gets his travel ban, finally.

Finally a bit of good news from America. After endless attempts from lower courts to derail this policy, that I would regard as both “common sense” and “not extensive enough”, the US Supreme Court has finally ruled that Trump’s so called “Muslim ban” (ie, a temporary ban on immigration from 6 countries that just happen to be Muslim majority, and which are considered to be potential terrorist hotspots), is in fact constitutional.

trumpgrin.jpg

From The Journal

THE US SUPREME Court is letting the Trump administration enforce most of its 90-day ban on travellers from six Muslim-majority countries, overturning lower court orders that blocked it.

Just for the record, I think it’s absolute insanity that it even had to go this far. I think it’s absurd that the elected President can have his orders overruled by any random judge in the country, even in the lowest of courts. I do understand that there needs to be some way to keep in line and to make sure that he doesn’t violate the constitution with his orders, but the Supreme Court alone should be the one court with the power to do so.

The action today is a victory for President Donald Trump in the biggest legal controversy of his presidency to date.

Controversial… even though a small majority of US citizens actually support the ban. In fact, a higher percentage of US citizens support the ban, than support Trump himself. The only reason this became such a controversy, was because of a vocal minority of lunatics complaining about it, and getting a platform to do so, from the treacherous mainstream media. The majority of people have seen the consequences that mass immigration from the Muslim world has had on Europe, and don’t want to see a similar epidemic of rapes, child grooming, acid attacks, terrorism, etc., to happen in America as well.

Gra.jpg
Why would Americans want to import this…
france-paris-shootings.jpg
… or this…
taharrush
…or this…

Or this?

The court did leave one category of foreigners protected, those “with a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States”, the court said in an unsigned opinion. The justices will hear arguments in the case in October.

And here’s hoping they’ll decide in October that the original ban wasn’t extensive enough, and start including other countries, particularly Saudi Arabia.

A number of groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have sharply criticised the ban, saying it unfairly targets Muslims.

No, because there are plenty of Muslim majority countries in the world, including some of the most populous ones, such as Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria etc, which aren’t included in the ban, and non-Muslim minorities living in the targeted countries, are also subject to the ban. Doesn’t seem unfair to me and even if was, does anybody honestly care? The American people have their own needs, and those of their loved ones to worry about, and can hardly be expected to put the needs of of citizens in countries which have adversarial relationships with America, ahead of their own.

Trump said last week that the ban would take effect 72 hours after being cleared by courts.

The anticipation is killing me.

The ban would apply to citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Please add more.

The Trump administration said the ban was needed to allow an internal review of the screening procedures for visa applicants from those countries. That review should be complete before 2 October, the first day the justices could hear arguments in their new term.

Why is this unreasonable again?

A reversal of roles for a change.

19400021_941178272686735_1058075634322547740_n.jpg
This hypocritical idiot doesn’t realise that he would be thrown off the top of a building for the lifestyle he lives, by the same people he is so desperate to defend.  This level of stupidity is exactly why the Western world is dying.

This isn’t a topic I expected to be addressing anytime soon, but it would be remiss of me and quite hypocritical, if I decided to ignore it, just because it doesn’t fit a narrative that I believe in. Apparently there has been yet another terrorist attack in Britain. Like many previous attacks, both in Britain, and in several other European countries, the weapon of choice was a motorised vehicle. However there is one key difference between this attack and all the others we’ve seen as of late. In this case, rather than a Muslim attacking a group of innocent white people, it was a white man attacking a group of innocent Muslims.

ramadan-bomb-athon-day-a-attacks-kills-terror-in-the-22543393.png
We’re going to have to update the score for “Muslims killed by Islamophobes”.
Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg
There we go. So the global score for Ramadan attacks so far is 139 to 1. Just watch as that one attack becomes the only one that matters.

I’m really not happy that this attack has taken place. Quite frankly, it accomplishes nothing, except giving ammunition to the controlled media and the drooling imbeciles who listen to them and parrot their lies, that there is somehow an epidemic of Islamophobic hate crimes, and that Muslims are the “real victims”. They finally have a new incident they can cite as an example of “white terrorism” and “Islamophobic violence”, and you can be sure that even a decade or so from now, they’ll still be citing it and drawing a false equivalence between it, and each of the dozens of Islamic terror attacks that will inevitably happen in the same time period.

web-Breivik-gesture-2016.jpg
Sure, they still bring up Anders Breivik, all these years later.

At the same time, a part of me isn’t really surprised that this has finally happened. I mean, how much longer could the things that have been happening go on the way they were? There’s been a near constant spate of Muslim on non-Muslim violence in Europe for the past few years, and Britain itself saw three major attacks occur within the space of three months. That’s not even taking into account the huge number of Muslim grooming gangs that have been raping white English girls for the past few decades, or any other violent crimes that they have committed against the native Brits. The police have failed miserably, to protect people. The media has tried to cover things up and downplay the significance of what is happening. The political establishment has ignored the problem and has continued to pursue policies that only make the problem worse. Can anyone really be surprised that after all this has been going on, that finally someone would snap and lash out in retaliation?

Just to be clear, I am not in any way condoning what happened. As I already said, this doesn’t do us any favours and I really wish that it didn’t happen. At the same time, I don’t think those of us who are speaking up about this problem have anything to apologise for. All we’re doing is drawing attention to what is happening. Much like the victims of every other terrorists attack that has occurred, these innocent Muslims are victims of the failed multicultural project, that has been forced on European nations against the collective will of the populace already living there. I can only hope that there won’t be an escalation of violence because of this, but I’m far too cynical to expect that this will be the case. I can’t see this situation ending well at all.

 

Sweden is effectively lost.

It’s been a fair bit of time since my last post, but I’m back today to talk about what is probably my most talked about topic of all, that being the current ongoing collective suicide of the nation of Sweden. Today I learned (to absolutely no shock whatsoever), that the country is actually getting worse, rather than better. At this point, I’m convinced that there is no hope of ever saving it and turning things around. There’s no hope for them. All we can do is look on from the outside with morbid curiosity, and let its inevitable collapse, serve as an example to the rest of us, on what not to do with our own countries.

From The Local

Eight new districts in Sweden have been added to a high-profile police list of ‘especially vulnerable areas’, where crime rates and poverty levels are often high, reports Swedish newspaper DN.

And I can guarantee you something right now. It isn’t a bunch of blonde haired, blue eyed, indigenous Swedes who are the ones inhabiting these “especially vulnerable areas”. It’s the so called “new Swedes”, who fled from their failed, poverty stricken hellhole countries, only to come to Sweden and recreate the exact same living standards in their new country. This is why I always have to laugh at people, who blame the pathology of the third world, on people living in the first world. The reality is, these people are responsible for their own problems. They aren’t only incapable of building a functioning society, but they can’t even maintain one that is already functioning.

1f3.jpg
This is exactly what happened in Haiti and Zimbabwe. This is exactly what is unfolding in real time in South Africa and many American inner cities. And this is exactly what will happen in Sweden and other European countries over the next few years.

In 2015 Sweden’s national police released a report of 53 so-called vulnerable areas, including 15 considered especially vulnerable. Eight new districts have now been added to that list, which has not yet been made public, bringing the latter number up to 23, reports the DN newspaper.

So in the space of two years, the number of no go zones has effectively increased by 50%. Good going Sweden.

1470775079351.png

The term “no-go zone” caught on in some international media back in 2015 after it was used by a Swedish newspaper columnist to label these areas, but it has been strongly rejected by police themselves.

Sure it’s a “zone” that you can’t “go” into. But we can’t be calling it a “no-go zone”, because of what that implies. It basically suggests that there are places in Sweden that aren’t safe for Swedish people, including Swedish law enforcement to enter. If people found out that they weren’t able to safely enter areas of their own country, because of the actions of a group of outsiders, they might start questioning the supposed benefits of the multicultural, suicide pact that they’ve entered.

The police definition of such districts describe them as socio-economically vulnerable areas where crime and poverty rates are generally high,

No explanation as to why the crime and poverty rates are so high in these areas, or any effort to investigate if there is a correlation between these areas that might be the cause. What makes these high crime, high poverty areas so different from the low crime, low poverty areas, and what do they all have in common? Sure why would you want to investigate something like that, and potentially try and solve the problem in the process?

bangladeshbl.jpg
What could possibly be the cause for these areas having such high crime rates? Remember, if the answer given is “racist”, it isn’t allowed to be considered.

where police regularly have to adapt their methods and equipment to the volatile situation,

How exciting. And to think there used to be a time when Sweden had very little crime at all. The poor police must have been so bored. At least now, their jobs are probably so much more fun than they used to be.

Look at the empowered feminists cops, dealing with a “mentally ill refugee”. I especially like the bit at 1:08, when one of them sends away a good Samaritan, who helped them subdue the feral beast. “Don’t worry citizen. We can take it from here. We were trained to deal with these kind of situations in Finland.

where there may be violent religious extremism

Must be those damn Christian extremists again.

Crusades.jpg
Forget about those Muslim extremists waging Jihad. The real problem is those Christian extremists waging Crusades.

and where residents often do not report crimes to the police, either out of fear of retaliation or because they think it will not lead to anything.

In fairness, reporting crime in Sweden, probably wouldn’t lead to anything.

Screen Shot 2017-06-14 at 16.31.18.png
What’s the point in even reporting a crime in Sweden?

According to DN, the new especially vulnerable areas are: Norrby and Hässleholmen/Hulta in Borås, Tynnered/Grevegården/Opaltorget in Gothenburg, Karlslund in Landskrona, Nydala/Hermodsdal/Lindängen in Malmö, Fittja and Alby in Stockholm and Gottsunda in Uppsala.

A small price to pay for all that “enrichment”, “vibrancy”, and various other benefits that come from living in a multicultural society.

Linda Staaf, who heads the national police NOA’s intelligence department, told the newspaper that some of these areas should have been classified as especially vulnerable in the previous report in 2015, but that the police had then not collected enough information to properly assess the situation there.

Probably because they couldn’t safely enter the areas to begin with. How can you investigate and assess things, if you can’t even enter?

“In comparison to the last report we now have more knowledge and a better picture,” she said.

And it’s a pretty bleak picture. The country is finished. All that is going to happen, is that the number of “especially vulnerable areas” will increase over time, as the number of hostile and incompatible people in the country increases. Eventually, native Swedes will have no more safe areas to escape to, and when that happens, shit will really hit the fan.

And they only have themselves to blame.

Yet another Terror attack in London.

groundhog-day-poster.jpg
Is this real life?

Well, it has happened yet again. We’re less than three months removed from the last terror attack in London, and less than two weeks since the last terror attack in England overall. In fact, the Manchester attack is so recent, that it hadn’t even stopped being a top news story yet.

Untitled.png
“About 27,100,000″ results.”

But hey, you know what this means right? Yep, it’s time to reset the counter…. AGAIN!!!!

days-since-last-muslim-terrorist-attack-0-0-0-0-17998664
At least we have a slightly different image now, instead of just re-posting the same one over and over.

I don’t really know what to say at this point. What more can I say really, that I haven’t already said countless times already? I’m sure all 2 or 3 of my readers are just as bored with reading the same lines repeatedly every time this sort of thing happens, as I am with writing them.

Untitled.png
Wow, this mysterious fellow here, posting on The Journal’s article about the attack, sure sums up how I feel right now. I bet he’s very intelligent, and possibly very handsome too.

It has in all honesty, gotten very difficult to feel any emotion anymore. I’m never taken by surprise anymore, anytime I hear about one of these attacks. If anything, I’m more surprised on the rare occasions when it turns out to be something other than a terrorist attack, for example, the fairly recent Times Square incident. As for the victims, I find that my sense of compassion for them is getting lower and lower each time. Yes, I still hate seeing innocent people losing their lives so needlessly, but at the same time I’m feeling a sense of “What are they doing to protect themselves and their countries?” I just feel a sense of… a sense of… oh, how do I put it into words?

Untitled.png
Wow, this guy has summed up my feelings on the matter perfectly, yet again.

^Yep, that’s it. That’s what I’m feeling. It’s not so much that I feel that the victims deserve it. Of course not. However, this keeps happening again and again and again, all across Europe. It’s completely obvious to anyone with pattern recognition skills (ie, anyone, seeing as we’re biologically hardwired for it), that there is a pattern here. Muslims are waging war against our way of life, and are never going to stop until we either submit to their will, or are all dead. Yet instead of acknowledging this obvious reality, the vast majority of people won’t speak up about it. People are more afraid of being thought of as being “racist” or “Islamophobic”, than getting killed. How can anyone be expected to feel sympathy for people who would rather be dead, raped, or enslaved, than getting called names? It’s absolutely pathetic and it really makes me question sometimes, if we’re even worth saving.

18814110_135467590339536_3761649477019991045_n.jpg
At least nobody ever called them “racist”.

Then, I remind myself that not everyone is like this. There are people out there with the courage to speak their minds and point out that the Emperor is naked. To all those who do speak up about what’s happening, regardless of the consequences for doing so, I would just like to say thank you. You help to remind me, that there is still some hope for saving our people and our way of life, and this prevents me from giving up on caring altogether. I only hope that that for everyone else, those who are still asleep, that the wake-up call comes sooner, rather than later. Because if they don’t wake up soon, and start acknowledging the existential threat that we’re facing, then they’re going to get us all killed.

 

 

“We can’t draw negative attention to our great ally.”

It’s a well known fact that America and Europe’s greatest ally in the Middle East is Israel. What isn’t as well known, is that their second greatest ally is Saudi Arabia. You know Saudi Arabia right? That’s the country which carries out public beheadings, has the death penalty for homosexuality, punishes victims of rape for the “crime of adultery” etc. Basically, Saudi Arabia is what you would get, if ISIS was a country. Yet somehow, this country is apparently a key ally of the liberal West, whose value system is supposed to be the exact opposite of all this.

Anyway, an investigation was conducted in the UK with regards to foreign funding of terrorism in the country. Apparently the report might not ever see the light of day, because it reveals something that is pretty well known to anyone who actually pays attention and researches this topic… that Saudi Arabia are the ones to blame.

From The Independent

An investigation into the foreign funding of extremist Islamist groups may never be published, the Home Office has admitted.

Sure why would the public want to know something like that? Why would the public care about finding out who is financing the terrorists that keep killing them?

17-remain-in-critical-care-after-manchester-terror-attack.jpg
“Who really cares about learning what caused this? Lets just go back to watching our Premier League football and X-Factor instead.”

The inquiry commissioned by David Cameron, was launched as part of a deal with the Liberal Democrats in December 2015, in exchange for the party supporting the extension of British airstrikes against Isis into Syria.

Yeah, sure. Airstrikes against ISIS. The same ISIS who are at war with Assad. The same Assad that David Cameron said, needs to be removed from power. Are we really supposed to believe that Cameron was bombing ISIS at the same time he was saying that Assad has to go?

Untitled.png
“We want Assad gone. We want to stop ISIS. ISIS want Assad gone. Assad wants to stop ISIS. We’re counting on the public being too stupid to see the contradiction here.”

But although it was due to be published in the spring of 2016, it has not been completed and may never be made public due to its “sensitive” contents.

“Sensitive”, meaning that it might anger the British public to learn that their government, as well as other governments all across the Western world, are allied with a country which finances the terrorists that are responsible for the spate of attacks in Europe the last few years.

150107180025-paris-shooting-youtube-0107-super-169.jpg
A country we call an ally, is responsible for this…
111.jpg
…and this…
paris-jihad-attack.jpg
…as well as this, and many more.

It is thought to focus on Saudi Arabia, which the UK recently approved £3.5bn worth of arms export licences to.

The UK (and the US), as well as other Western states, arm Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia then arms terrorists. Terrorists then use arms to kill Western citizens. Therefore, Western governments are directly responsible for their own citizens being killed by terrorists.

truedeau-lav.jpg
And this is why ISIS are always so well armed.

A spokesperson from the Home Office told The Independent a decision on the publication of the report would be taken “after the election by the next government”.

Of course. It might effect the way the people choose to vote, if they found out that their government is arming the people who keep murdering them on the streets. My guess as well, is that the report won’t actually get published (at least not if the Conservative Party win). It will be flushed down the memory hole.

But in a separate interview with The Guardian, a spokesperson said the report may never be published, describing its contents were “very sensitive”.

It might offend our great ally Saudi Arabia. Sure, they share absolutely none of our values, and they’re directly responsible for so many deaths in our country, but we need them. They’re a great and trusted ally in our conflicts with all those other countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya etc, that never actually did anything to us.

Tom Brake, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, has written a letter to the Prime Minister pressing her on when the report will be published and what steps she proposes to take to address “one of the root causes of violent extremism in the UK”.

She’ll take absolutely no steps whatsoever. Not only that, she won’t even try to defend it, because there is literally no defence whatsoever. For example, lets look at this video, where an official is asked to justify their condemnation of Iran’s alleged lack of democracy, while turning a blind eye to Saudi Arabia’s much more blatant lack of democracy.

It’s absolutely incredible. The awkward silence is so long, that you could genuinely believe that the video had frozen for a while. There’s no moral justification whatsoever for the West’s undying defence of Saudi Arabia, while at the same time, they condemn countries like Syria and Iran for their alleged lack of democracy and human rights. The fact is, they don’t give a damn about either of these things. They’re just an excuse that they use to cover for their real motivations, whenever they want to launch a war or regime change against a targeted country.

“You will agree with me that the protection of our country, of the British people, is the most important job of any government,” he wrote. “Certainly, more important than potential trade deals with questionable regimes, which appear to be the only explanation for your reticence.

No, they don’t agree with you at all. They don’t give a damn about protecting the British people.

“When will this report be finished and published? And what steps do you propose to take to address one of the root causes of violent extremism in the UK?”

“Never” and “none”.

Mr Brake accused Ms May of adopting a “short-sighted approach” to the funding of violent Islamist groups in the UK and urged that those who fund them should be called out publicly.

Accusing the Conservatives of being “worried about upsetting their dodgy friends in the Middle East”, he said party had “broken their pledge to investigate funding of violent Islamist groups in the UK”.

He added: “That short-sighted approach needs to change. It is critical that these extreme, hard line views are confronted head on, and that those who fund them are called out publicly.”

But…but… that might offend our great and trusted ally. We need to be more tolerant and accepting of them, when they finance the terrorists that kill our people.

It comes after Home Secretary Amber Rudd suggested during a leadership debate, that UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia are good for industry. 

That’s all that matters to these people. Making money. Who cares about the long term effects of their short term greed?

DA64Fx1WAAIGstk.jpg
This is essentially what’s happening in Europe right now with the migrant crisis. Short term, it might raise a countries GDP by a percent or two. Long term… “oh who cares about that?”.

The Government has recently approved £3.5bn worth of arms export licences to Saudi Arabia and a stream of British ministers have visited the kingdom to solicit trade, despite its ongoing involvement in the bombing campaign in Yemen.

Meanwhile they constantly condemn Assad and Russia for bombing ISIS strongholds

Government figures compiled by Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) show the UK has licenced over £4.1 billion of arms to the Middle East since the last election in May 2015, and that two thirds of UK arms exports go to the Middle East.

And then some of those exported arms come right back into the UK and get used against UK citizens.