You may have noticed that I haven’t posted about any terrorist attacks in quite some time, something I used to do on very regular basis. This isn’t because they haven’t still been happening. It’s because it was quite frankly happening so often, that it was actually getting boring to post about it every time. There once was a time (like three years ago), when any one of these attacks would have been the top international news story for a week or so. It was unusual and shocking to see these attacks take place. But that was then, and in just a few short years, it has happened so often, that it has gone from being something shocking and traumatic, to being the new normal. Nobody is phased anymore. People just take it for granted, that this sort of thing is going to happen every once in a while. We’ve been desensitised.
Nevertheless, just because I’m no longer writing about every single attack that happens, that doesn’t mean I’m going to stop writing about them entirely. Sometimes, I come across a story that I actually feel is still worth taking a look at. And with that in mind, lets do exactly that.
A CAR ploughed into a crowd of children and their parents on a walk near Karlshamn, in Sweden, police revealed today.
Those damn self driving cars and their propensity to run over people. Must be a Tesla model.
Two pupils were hurt with a police manhunt now underway.
A manhunt? So that means there was a driver then? Guess it wasn’t a Tesla after all.
A spokesman for Sweden‘s police service said children “threw themselves” out of the way of the car, which appeared to have aimed directly for the group of 100 people.
He said: “The car accelerated into the group of students and teachers.
“The car increased speed and drove straight towards them.
So it was no accident then? I wonder what the actual motivation could be?
“He drove into two of the students. One was injured on the wrist and possibly the other student was also injured.”
Thankfully, very little damage was done. Not only is the guy who did this, a massive piece of shit, but he’s also a massive failure as well. Plows into a crowd of 100, and doesn’t even manage to kill one.
Police have today appealed for any information on the horrifying incident, which took place at 1pm local time (12pm BST) yesterday.
Rest easy everyone. The Swedish police are on the case.
I bet people feel safer already.
The group was made up of 100 children and 10 teachers from Mjallby secondary school.
They were walking from Hinnedalsvagen to Grundsjon as part of a social event.
The car was described as a black or dark blue Saab. It was driving at around 25mph when it hit the crowd.
The driver fled the scene, police said.
Notice how there’s no description of the attacker? Just in case you need a reminder why this is…
But yeah, I think we can safely guess the background of the attacker, just from pattern recognition.
Witnesses were unable to identify whether the driver was male of female.
Actually, you know what?Maybe it was a native Swede after all.
Police are appealing for any information.
And no doubt, if someone calls up and gives the police an accurate description of what the attacker looks like, the caller will probably be arrested instead, for “hate speech”.
You had your chance Sweden, just a few short weeks ago, to try and vote your way out of this mess. Instead, you chose to vote for more of the same. So enjoy the results of the vote, Swedes. Something tells me, that the next four years are going to be very long and very difficult for you.
Why does this keep happening? I keep thinking to myself that I’ve heard the very worst from Sweden, and that they’ll never manage to sink any lower in my eyes. Yet somehow, they always manage to find new ways to amaze me with the depths they have managed to sink. Scraping the bottom of the barrel? Oh please, Sweden managed to scrape away the very surface of the barrel itself, and then managed to scrape away the Earth underneath were the barrel was standing, and come out the other side in Australia. This has got to be it. There couldn’t possibly be another story that sums up the dire situation in Sweden, better than this one.
At least, I’m saying that now. If history has taught me anything, it is to never expect Sweden to finally stop shocking me. I’m sure they’ll eventually have an even worse story than this one.
Gothenburg, Sweden – The first ever man-free music festival kicked off in Gothenburg last week as a result of migrant sexual assaults at music events in years past.
I’m pretty sure I covered that story myself actually. Or possibly a story very similar to it. I have no way of being sure, I mean there are so many stories about Sweden,and I’ve covered so many myself, I honestly can’t keep track anymore.
As the 2018 Bravalla music festival was canceled due to rapes by Arabic and African welfare migrants in previous years,
the 2018 man-free Gothenburg music festival was heralded as the “most progressive in history” because attendees, performers, journalists, and even police providing security for the event had to be female.
Yes and we all know how well the Female police have done in Sweden.
“We expected thousands of women to attend as a certain testosterone, I mean certain tension had been lifted,” said event spokesperson Rebecka Ljung touting the concert a “safe zone for all women”.
A safe zone you say? Were certain people are kept out? You mean… like a border perhaps?
Although the two-day music festival banned men, transgenders were welcome as festival organizers gleefully accepted any male depressed and crazy enough to pump himself full of psychotropic and hormone-altering drugs trying to convince himself he is a woman.
I bet you can already predict the plot twist already.
News of the all-female (and transgender male) music festival spread fast as Swedish media eager to tout hatred for western civilization provided non-stop coverage leading up to the event.
Here it comes…
Knowledge about the festival, in fact, became so widespread hoards of foreign welfare migrants looting and burning cars in the streets of Gothenburg took time away from destroying Sweden to attend the event in hopes of making involuntary sexual contact with female concertgoers.
And how did that plan turn out, you might ask?
Initially, the all-male migrant gangs were turned away from the man-free music festival
Wow that’s a shocker.
but quickly gained access after contending they were ‘awakened Muslim transgender non-men’.
But that sure isn’t.
As gangs of these ‘Muslim transgender non-men’ made their way through crowds of female concertgoers, ‘non-problems’ began to occur as scores of women were maybe kind of certain something had happened to them.
“At first a lot of women were angry about all these men coming into our women-only event and sexually assaulting everyone, but then the men told us they were Muslim transgenders,” said a 27-year-old festival attendee who endured the diversity she received at the hands of her attackers in order not to offend Muslims or transgenders.
As the immigrant transgenders continued to diversify concert goers, Swedish female police officers in attendance were powerless to stop the consensual assaults in fear of being reprimanded by their superiors for intolerance and discrimination against migrants.
“Many women attending the music festival, including our own officers, were not familiar with the term Muslim transgenders. In the interest of Swedish acceptance and compassion for all ideas, opinions, people, plants, and animals our officers decided to supervise these diversifications instead of adopting a stance of intolerance and bigotry,” said Sweden’s National Police Commissioner Dan Eliasson in regards to hoards of Arabic and African illiterates having their way with scores of female Swedes.
A bunch of women were getting sexually assaulted by Muslim men who pretended to be transgender. The women themselves put up with it, and the police refused to do anything to stop it, because both groups were afraid of being thought of as transphobic or racist.
Can you see what I mean when I said that this is probably the “most Swedish” story that I’ve ever read?
To date, none of the so-called transgender migrants who diversified female festival-goers have been arrested or even questioned about their actions during the concert.
And I doubt any of them ever will be either.
But if you think the story couldn’t possibly get anymore absurd, then read on for the conclusion, which really pushes it over the edge.
Several Swedish male nationals were, however, taken into custody for disturbing the peace. During the music festival news of the migrant transgender diversification of female concertgoers spread over Facebook and other social media streaming services.
As Enraged fathers, brothers, husbands, and boyfriends of female attendees entered the concert venue to stop transgender migrants from diversifying their daughters, wives, sisters, and girlfriends several were arrested by police on charges of assault, racial and preferential identity discrimination which can levy a term of twenty years in prison under Swedish law.
So lets just summarise this story once again.
Sweden throws open their borders to the very worst countries in the world, and sees their rates of rape and sexual assault skyrocket as a result.
Sweden stops recording crimes based on ethnicity, and pretends it’s just a problem with men in general. Coincidentally, all Swedish men became rapists at around the same time as Sweden starts seeing a massive increase in migration from Africa and the Middle East.
They set up women’s only music festivals, so women won’t experience sexual assault.
Muslim men hear about the festival and get in by claiming to be transgender.
Muslim men start sexually assaulting the women in the women’s only festival.
The Women themselves do nothing, for fear of appearing intolerant to migrants / transgender people.
The police do nothing, for fear of appearing intolerant to migrants / transgender people.
The men who engaged in sexual assault are not arrested.
Fathers, husbands, brothers, and boyfriends of the sexually assaulted women try to defend them. They do get arrested.
I can’t even be angry when I read stories like this anymore. It’s just too insane for my mind to even make sense of.All I can do is just sit here and try my best to make sense of it all.
“Diversity is our greatest strength. We don’t need to explain why this is. We just know it to be true. Just like how we know that the sun revolves around the earth, and only racists heretics would ever question the obvious wisdom of that”.
Well it seems that diversity is being threatened in the UK. For reasons that are completely unexplainable (but most likely caused by racism), black students are failing to graduate from university at the same rate as their white counterparts. Because diversity and equality of outcome are more important than holding everyone to the same high standards as each other, something needs to be done about this ASAP.
Universities could be punished unless they give a higher proportion of top degrees to black students, under new proposals drawn up by the regulator.
Notice how there’s no mention of a requirement for the black students having to actually achieve the grades necessary to earn a top degree? They just have to be given it anyway.
The Office for Students (OfS) has announced plans to overhaul its guidelines for boosting diversity in higher education, in what it says is the “biggest shake up” since 2004.
Are they ever going to explain why boosting “diversity” is such an important thing to do? What are the actual benefits of this increased diversity? Why is it so essential? Why do we need it so badly, that we need to do away with “fairness”, and “merit” in order to achieve it? In what ways will the benefits of this increased diversity, outweigh the benefits of maintaining the current high standards?
They will never answer these questions, because quite frankly, there is no logical answer to them. This is purely based on ideology, rather than common sense.
If institutions fail to comply with the regulator’s new “tougher” national targets for increasing the number of disadvantaged students, they could be penalised through a fine or even de-registered.
So they say it’s about helping “disadvantaged” students, but at the same time, are specifically focusing on race, rather than economic background. As far as they’re concerned, a black student from a rich family is disadvantaged, when compared to a white student from a poor family. Of course, anyone with any knowledge of what is going on, knows this is not really about helping students from disadvantaged backgrounds. It’s simply about hurting the prospects of white people.
Chris Millward, the OfS director for fair access and participation, said that universities will no longer be able to “mark their own homework” on their plans to up their intake of 18-year-olds from poor backgrounds.
Instead, the new regulator, which came into force earlier this year, plans to set a series of national targets that all universities will be expected to meet.
These will not be limited to targets for admitting more school leavers from deprived households, but will also include addressing the gap in degree attainment between black and white students, according to OfS proposals.
They never consider the idea of investigating WHY this gap in degree attainment exists in the first place. Understanding the root causes of the gap and trying to go from there to solve it, is not part of the agenda. Instead, they just want to manipulate the results and achieve equality of outcome without an equality of merit.
There has been an almost 50 per cent increase in the number of black and ethnic minority students in England between 2007 and 2016.
“Mass, replacement level immigration is just a Neo-Nazi, white supremacist, conspiracy theory.”
78 per cent of white students graduated last year with a first class of upper second class degree, compared to just 53 per cent of black students.
Qualifications before attending university, although a key factor in degree outcomes, do not explain the differences between ethnic groups, according to data analysed by Universities UK.
No, but I’ve got a theory on what could explain the difference instead.
In a consultation document, published today, the regulator sets out a number of areas that universities should work on, such as combatting the higher drop-out rate among poorer students compared to their middle-class peers.
Mr Millward said: “Universities have always set their own targets, and have used different measures of success. They were kind of marking their own homework.
“We are going to set clearer national targets which they will refer to: not just looking at access but do students finish their courses? What is their degree outcome depending on background?”
I can guarantee you that this will all fail miserably. Governments are too incompetent to make anything work right.
Mr Millward said that universities have spent hundreds of millions of pounds on measures aimed at diversifying their intake of students, but have paid little or no attention to whether their schemes were effective.
Hundreds of millions of pounds down the toilet in order to pursue this obsession with diversity, and we’ve still yet to hear an explanation about why this diversity is even desirable. Be perfectly honest with yourself. Even ignoring the financial cost, and just focusing on everything else that has happened, has any country at all benefited from increased diversity? Has Sweden benefited? Has Germany? Has Italy? Has France? Has the UK? Has *insert any country here*? Seriously, what are the actual benefits of this diversity? Will anyone ever actually answer the question?
“I don’t doubt that universities are committed to improving access. They are spending a lot of money and doing a lot but they don’t understand enough about whether it’s working,” he told The Daily Telegraph.
It’s never going to work. Just like the way the first world has thrown trillions of dollars at Africa in foreign aid and development over the past 50 years, and if anything, a lot of the countries there are going backwards rather than forwards. You can keep throwing money at the problem all you want, but it’s never going to make a difference, because a lack of funding is not the cause.
“We are upping the expectation on evaluation. Once we know that, we can target [budgets] where it can make a difference.”
Last year, universities spent a total of around £800 million on projects to increase access and around half of this was spent on bursaries for students from poor households.
“I’m not arguing against bursaries being provided, particularly because students can be really challenged by the cost when they are at university,” Mr Millward said.
And yet despite spending that much money, they’re no closer to solving the “”problem”.
“But there is very little evidence that bursaries improve access. That is a really obvious areas where we need to evaluate. [We need to] ask why it is spent and what impact it is having?”
He actually said something that I agree with.
Dr Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, said he welcomes the emphasis on evaluation
“There is a great deal of activity to improve access taking place across the sector but what we need now is a clear overview of which interventions make the biggest difference,” he said. “We need to be clearer on what works, and what doesn’t, if we are to shift the dial.”
Unfortunately, they’re not going to use the scientific method when trying to figure this situation out. They will automatically refuse to consider certain possibilities, limit the scope of what they will actually investigate, fail to find a possible solution, and either just go back to throwing money at the problem (and getting nowhere in the process), or just creating a two tier system, were black students are held to lower standards than white students, and see their graduation rate increase that way instead.
So the South African situation, which I have given frequent attention to over the past few years, has really started heating up recently. It has gotten so bad in fact, that it has even come to the attention of Donald Trump.
I have asked Secretary of State @SecPompeo to closely study the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers. “South African Government is now seizing land from white farmers.” @TuckerCarlson@FoxNews
Anyone who has paid any attention to what has been going on in South Africa, will be aware that all Trump has done here, is simply tell a truth that the Western media has deliberately ignored and covered up. Nothing he has said here is offensive. Nothing he said here is racist. And nothing he has said here is untrue.
So of course, he has managed to cause massive offence by saying it. And this “Bernstein” fellow really sums it up quite well.
This has been a /pol and a Stormfront meme forever and a hobbyhorse of racial nationalists everywhere. Unreal https://t.co/BpSdgKrNVj
What can you really say about this? It’s a completely hysterical reaction. The US regularly goes to war with countries ostensibly to “protect human rights”, for far less justification, than what is happening to white people in South Africa , and nobody bats an eye. Trump simply draws attention to what is happening to them, and people like this Bernstein fellow have a meltdown over it. The idea of white people ever being thought of as victims of racial persecution, is a concept they refuse to accept. And when you look at Bernstein’s tweets, it’s obvious why. They are terrified of white people in other parts of the world seeing what’s happening, and realising that the same will happen to them eventually, and waking up to the threat. They want to keep us asleep, until it’s too late to reverse what is happening.
But why is this Bernstein fellow so upset at the idea of white people waking up to the genocide that we’re facing? What is his interest in all this?
Yeah, I just can’t figure out why this “Bernstein” fellow would have a problem with Trump drawing attention to the plight of South African whites.
What do you think could be the reason, dear reader?
Gardai are on high alert for a gang targeting and isolating drunk women across the southeast.
A 28-year-old man of Pakistani origin — who was acquitted of rape in recent years — is the main suspect but gardaí believe he has friends who are also involved. The man is known to drive a grey Kilkenny-registered Audi.
There have been reports about the gang in Dungarvan, Co Waterford, in recent weeks. It has also been active in Carlow and Waterford.
A source said that the gang is a ‘real concern’. ‘This man was acquitted of rape in recent years but is considered a real concern. He and his friends go to clubs and pubs where they target drunk young women, try to isolate them and take them away.
‘Pub staff and bouncers copped them in Dungarvan and managed to stop them. This is deliberate targeting and isolating drunk women and claiming consent.’
Yes, yes, I’ve heard it a million times already, that this sort of thing happens everywhere, has happened in Ireland long before the borders were opened, and that members of every demographic commit these kinds of crimes.
I understand that, but that’s not an excuse for any of this at all. Unfortunately, no matter where you go, there’s always going to be bad people who do bad things. It’s impossible to eliminate these problems entirely. We just have to try to be vigilant, protect ourselves and the people we love, and bring the criminals to justice when they engage in their crimes.
But just because we have these problems already, doesn’t make it acceptable to add to the problem and make it worse. Our own home grown scumbags are our burden to deal with, and when they commit their crimes, it is our responsibility to punish them. Like it or not, we have an obligation to them, because they are our own. But we have no obligation to the scumbags of the rest of the world.There’s no reason for them to be our burden as well.
It’s just a simple mathematical reality that more rapists in a country means more rapes in that country. Less rapists means less rapes. We can’t eliminate 100% of rapes because no matter what, we’ll always have our own home grown rapists. But we can however lessen the number of rapes in our country by not importing the dregs of the world, and letting them roam our streets freely. We can’t protect every woman from sexual predators, but we can lessen the number who fall victim to it by just having common sense and not flooding our country with people from parts of the world, with a poor record in terms of how they treat their own women.
But I know I’m wasting my time here. We’re still going to pretend that there is no difference in the crime rates of different ethnic groups, no difference in the attitudes towards women, of different ethnic groups, and no way to solve the problems we’re seeing. Ireland is just going to end up like the UK, Germany, and Sweden eventually, at this rate.
The only thing I can say at this point, is try not to let yourself become a statistic ladies. Take care of yourself when you’re out. Watch what you drink, stick with people you trust, and always be alert. I’m just sorry that this country has learned nothing from the mistakes of other countries.
I’ve quite often mentioned the situation in South Africa because I’m of the belief that South Africa is actually just a preview of things to come in every single (currently) white majority country, in the future. They’re just a few decades further down the path then the rest of us, but the difference is, whereas it’s too late to prevent the inevitable there, there is still time for the rest of us, if we can learn from their mistakes. We can still get off this path in time, if we just wake up and come to our senses, before it’s too late. In the mean time, all we can do is look on from afar at the present situation in South Africa, and try to remind ourselves that we don’t want the same to happen to us.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa recently announced plans to allow white people’s land to be taken without compensation, which will then be distributed to black people in a move that he believes will be good for the economy.
It has been on the cards for quite some time, but now it’s official. They’re actually going to go through with the land confiscation. And everything I’ve heard on this topic, suggests that the whites will not give it up peacefully. The only question that really remains now, is whether the blacks will exterminate the whites, or will the whites successfully defend themselves in a civil war against them? Either way, bloodshed is inevitable now, and all we can do is wait and see what happens.
The president made the announcement late on Tuesday in a televised address to the nation.
I know it’s an overdone cliche at this point, but I’m going to do it anyway. Imagine if a white leader (for example, Trump), went on TV and announced that he was going to confiscate property from the black minority in America, without compensation, and hand it over to white people? Can you imagine the reaction, both within America itself, and globally?
Yeah of course it would not be tolerated at all. But seeing as it’s a black leader doing it to white people, nobody cares, because they’re brainwashed fools who believe in the idiotic myth of white privilege.
The farmers have claimed that the government’s plan will be “catastrophic and could lead to anarchy and food shortages like Venezuela or Zimbabwe”.
Which is exactly what I’m predicting too, by the way.
The economy of Zimbabwe collapsed after their own land reform was carried out.
“Just an unfortunate coincidence.”
More than 20 years after the end of apartheid in South Africa, white farmers still own the majority of South Africa’s land.
And why shouldn’t they? I already explained it in some detail in this previous post, but the vast majority of the land that makes up South Africa, was uninhabited, before it was colonised by Europeans. Most of the present day black South Africans are themselves descended from immigrants, who settled in South Africa AFTER it was already settled and built up by white people. They willingly chose to come to South Africa in order to share in the prosperity that the white people created, prosperity they could never create themselves. And now, instead of showing their gratitude, they’re driving out, stealing from, and exterminating their benefactors, and are rapidly pushing the country towards the same failed state as every other Sub-Saharan African country. They’re going to destroy themselves in the process, but they’re far too stupid to see that, just like the Zimbabweans were before them.
An organisation representing South Africans, AfriForum, said that land expropriation with no compensation would have “catastrophic results like in Venezuela and Zimbabwe”.
The organisation’s chief executive Kallie Kriel said: “History teaches us that international investors, regardless of what AfriForum or anyone else says, are unwilling to invest in a country where property rights are not protected.”
Yeah, but who cares about history? That’s all in the past. Sure, Communism has resulted in countless millions murdered every time it has been tried. Sure, followers of Islam have always tried to conquer and force their beliefs on every culture they have come into contact with. Sure, multiculturalism has resulted in conflict everywhere it has ever occurred. Sure what is being attempted in South Africa now, has already failed in Zimbabwe when it was tried there. We should try to make all these things work anyway, because… because… well you know what, I don’t even need to give a reason.
Ian Cameron, of AfriForum, said: “We’re really heading for a state of anarchy if something doesn’t change drastically.
Anarchy is probably the best case scenario. I think what we’re actually going to see will be more like Rwanda in 1994, but with the white South Africans in the place of the Tutsis. The rhetoricbeing directedtowards them, is already eerily similar.
“There are places where the police simply refuse to act. They don’t know the law well enough or refuse to apply it to logical reasoning when it comes to defending people’s property rights.”
Or more likely, they just don’t care to enforce the law.
In the 1990s black South Africans received grants and subsidies to buy land plots, which resulted in overcrowding and poor land use.
Because they were too incompetent to use it properly. That might not be such a big deal with small plots of subsistence land, but with massive commercial farms that the economy depends on, and that feed the population, it will be a massive disaster.
South Africa’s history of colonial conquest has pushed most of the black people into crowded urban areas or rural reserves.
They weren’t pushed onto anything. They willingly chose to immigrate to South Africa from other parts of the continent, because of the prosperity that the white South Africans had created, reproduced at a far higher rate than the whites did, until their population exploded, and ended up in their present situation. They have nobody to blame, but themselves.
The 1913 Native Lands Act made it illegal for Africans to acquire land beyond these reserves, which became known as “Homelands”.
They should just be thankful that they were allowed live in the country at all, seeing as they never could have created one with similar living standards themselves. It was actually for their own good in a way that they weren’t allowed to own land. If they had, they would have fucked the country up much sooner than they are now.
About one-tenth of land in white ownership has been transferred to black ownership since the end if apartheid, which is only a third of the government’s target.
Some investors think that Ramaphosa may be simply trying to win political points with the land reform ahead of an election next year.
Democracy in action folks.
Bennie Van Zyl, the general manager of the Agricultural Union of South Africa (TAU SA), said: “For us, this is a pity that they’ve made their choice, because no one will invest in this economy and we actually need growth to address the realities of South Africa. So we have great concern for this approach.
“A lot of foreign countries that have already contacted us as an organisation say if that is the case, we are not willing to invest in your country anymore.
“And if the ANC goes through with this, it will be devastating for this country.”
You’re damn right it will be, but I don’t think there’s any turning back now. It’s going to get very bad there very soon.
And I guarantee you that the media will be blaming the victims when it does happen.
Whoever controls the flow of information, controls the thoughts of the masses. For a very, very, long time, this power was exclusively in the hands of the mainstream media. They had the power to decide the results of elections, decide popular policies, and decide pretty much everything else of importance. However, they eventually became complacent, self-assured that their power was untouchable. And because they became complacent, things have now changed, and they’re in full on panic mode. They’ve been exposed and lost the trust of the masses, and they can’t handle it. Instead of taking a moment to reflect on everything, they instead have chosen to have a two year long temper tantrum, that currently shows no sign of abating.
President Donald Trump met with the publisher of the New York Times A.G. Sulzberger earlier this month. But the two seem to have different recollections of the July 20th meeting at the White House.
Of course they do.
Trump first revealed the meeting took place in a tweet on Sunday morning from his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey.
“Had a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times,” Trump wrote. “Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, ‘Enemy of the People.’ Sad!”
Where’s the lie exactly? All they ever do is put out fake news these days. In fact,they put out so much fake news, that Trump was actually able to make a list of the top 10 fake news stories of 2017, just by picking the ten most egregious examples.
This is not simple incompetence. This is a deliberate attempt to gaslight,mislead, and control the thoughts of the general population. They want the people to feel frightened, feel angry, and to vote against their own interests. Therefore, it is perfectly fair and accurate to refer to the mainstream media as the enemy of the people.
In a lengthy statement released after Trump’s tweet, the New York Times said that it was the White House who invited the Times, and that it requested the meeting be off-the-record.
This could very well be true, but seeing as they’ve put out so much fake news already, I’m not going to believe them.
But with Trump’s tweet, a Times spokeswoman said the newspaper decided to publicize Sulzberger’s “detailed notes.” Sulzberger attended the meeting along with editorial page editor, James Bennet.
Sulzberger said he accepted the meeting to raise concerns about “the president’s deeply troubling anti-press rhetoric” and that he told Trump his language was divisive and “increasingly dangerous.”
According to the Publisher of the NYT, Trump is the one who is using divisive language.
Is it zero self awareness, or a zero sense of shame with these people?
“I told him that although the phrase ‘fake news’ is untrue and harmful,
He just engaged in fake news with this sentence.
I am far more concerned about his labeling journalists ‘the enemy of the people.’ I warned that this inflammatory language is contributing to a rise in threats against journalists and will lead to violence,” Sulzberger said.
And meanwhile in the United States…
Do you think that maybe there’s a possibility that the hateful rhetoric that media like the NYT put out about white people, could be contributing to the stats above? Do they even care? Of course not. These journalists make me sick to my stomach. They don’t give a damn about the violence that they incite on others, but when they’re called out, suddenly, they’re the victims.
“I repeatedly stressed that this is particularly true abroad, where the president’s rhetoric is being used by some regimes to justify sweeping crackdowns on journalists.
I warned that it was putting lives at risk, that it was undermining the democratic ideals of our nation, and that it was eroding one of our country’s greatest exports: a commitment to free speech and a free press.
You shameless, sickening rat. Nobody is stopping you from engaging in free speech. Nobody is stopping the free press from reporting the news. All he’s doing is calling you out on your lies, and holding you to account. Just as you have a right to say something, other people have a right to respond. These journalists are just unbelievable. They actually genuinely believe that they should be free to say whatever untrue things they want about people, and claim that they’re the victims, when these people talk back.
It’s times like this that I actually wish Trump really was as bad as they say he is, and was rounding up journalists and executing them.
“Throughout the conversation I emphasized that if President Trump, like previous presidents, was upset with coverage of his administration he was of course free to tell the world.
Which is exactly what he’s doing.
I made clear repeatedly that I was not asking for him to soften his attacks on The Times if he felt our coverage was unfair.
And so he shouldn’t.
Instead, I implored him to reconsider his broader attacks on journalism, which I believe are dangerous and harmful to our country,” he continued.
And I, and many others believe, that spreading fake news is a much greater danger, than calling out the perpetrators of the fake news. Maybe if you stopped lying, stopped trying to incite violence against white people, and started just reporting a fair and unbiased report of the news, you wouldn’t have to worry about being called out anymore.
“The president regularly meets with members of the media and we can confirm this meeting took place,” said White House spokeswoman Mercedes Schlapp.
A president meeting with the publisher of one of the country’s most prominent newspapers is not unusual. Presidents have often held off-the-record meetings with owners and publishers of major media outlets.
But the Times holds a special place for Trump, a New York native. Despite his frequent criticism of Times’ reporters and their stories, he has still given the paper multiple interviews.
Yeah,and that’s a stupid idea Trump. Don’t give them the time of day. They need you, more than you need them.
Sulzberger is still a new publisher. He took over the family-controlled paper from his father Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. in January and has been overseeing a boom time for the business.
Despite Trump’s “failing New York Times” nickname, the Times is actually experiencing a surge in subscribers and popularity. Its profits increased by about two-thirds in the first quarter of 2018. Its “The Daily” podcast brings in millions of listeners each month.
Yeah, until actually see the statistics here, I’m going to remain skeptical.
Soon after winning the 2016 election, Trump traveled to meet with editors and reporters at the New York Times’ headquarters, where he lauded the paper as a “great, great American jewel” and that he hoped they could all “get along.”
I’ve often pointed out that the “diversity is our greatest strength” meme, has been heavily pushed, even though not a single shred of evidence has ever been provided to back it up. However, it looks as if they’ve finally found the evidence that they’ve needed at last. Following France’s recent victory in the World Cup, the treacherous career politicians, and the tightly controlled mainstream media are all rallying behind the story as “proof”, that diversity really is a strength. Lets just take a look at a sample of some recent headlines on the topic.
Wow, when you look at that, it seems pretty unanimous. How could anyone possibly doubt it, when all these different media sources, all independently came to the same conclusion? The evidence must be overwhelming. If I didn’t know better, and I was some kind of crazy, tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist, I would almost suspect that the media is basically a monopoly colluding with one another, on the narratives that should be pushed.
“JUST A COINCIDENCE. GO BACK TO SLEEP.”
No, I would say that THIS, is what is actually extremely dangerous to our democracy.
So yeah, according to the media and the political establishment, diversity is a wonderful thing, because a “diverse” team won a tournament that involves kicking a ball into a net. This is apparently the most important thing ever.
So lets take a look at what has been happening in “diverse” France, in the aftermath of their world cup victory.
Isn’t it funny, how the media is cherry picking which stories to focus their attention on, in regards to the diversity narrative? They play up the benefits of diversity in regards to the World Cup victory, a great honour for any country of course, but not something that is essential to the wellbeing of France or the French people. But in regards to the riots, violence, property damage etc., all of which are largely a consequence of France’s immigration policies, they are completely silent. No sane person thinks that the benefits of winning the World Cup, compensate for the untold damage that the country has undergone in the last few decades. Does the World Cup victory compensate for the multiple terror attacks? Does it compensate for all the burned our cars and smashed windows? Does it compensate for all the black/Arab on white violence that has happened in the country? Does it compensate for the collapsing social cohesion in the country?
Of course it doesn’t, but the media and career politicians are never going to ask any of these questions, because they don’t give a damn about any of this. They have a mission to enforce a multicultural dystopian hellhole on the people of Europe, and they will cynically exploit any piece of propaganda that can help promote it, while downplaying any information, that might hinder it.
Enjoy your World Cup victory French people. If things keep going the way that they’re going, it could very well be one of the last things that you have any reason to feel proud about.
For a long time, I’ve tried my best to understand and make sense of the transgender issue, but even after all this time, I’m still no closer to doing so. It’s not that I don’t feel any sense of sympathy or compassion for what these people are going through. It’s just that after all this time, I’ve yet to see any compelling scientific evidence that a quote, unquote “sex change” actually does meet the criteria for turning people into the opposite sex. As far as I can see, all it does is take vulnerable people with severe mental health problems, irreparably mutilate their bodies, and turn them into a poor imitation of what they aspire to be.
Yet despite these very real reasons that make many people, myself included, feel skeptical, the issue only seems to be getting more attention and becoming a much bigger deal, with absolutely no attempt being made to address our skepticisms . I think really since around the time that Bruce Jenner transitioned, the issue has been heavily pushed by the media and the political establishment as the next big “civil rights frontier” to overcome. We’re led to believe that the reason why we’re hearing so much more about it today is because of “greater awareness”, “greater understanding”, and that more transpeople are “finding the courage” to come forward because of this.
I personally don’t buy it myself. I am not a scientist, so I don’t have the empirical evidence to back up what I’m about to say, but this is my own personal belief, based on observation and contemplation. I personally believe that there are two different kinds of transgender people, similar in a way to how there are two different types of diabetes. Type A, are people who are born with their brain wired differently than what is typical for their biological sex. These people are naturally transgender, and make up that tiny minority who have always existed. There’s probably no way that these people will ever be able to come to terms with their biological sex, and while I don’t personally think that transitioning is a good idea in general, it’s probably the best solution for addressing their specific cases.
Type B on the other hand are a product of nurture rather than nature, and are I believe, the vast majority of cases, particularly the cases that have come in the past few years. The average human brain is not fully developed until around the age of 25 and even then, neuroplasticity, is a thing. The human brain can rewire itself based on external stimuli. Therefore, is it really that hard to consider the possibility that when the media is heavily pushing something, and SJW parents and teachers are encouraging it, that this can have an effect on how children think, and this could be what actually accounts for the massive rise in transgender kids the last few years?
What a strange coincidence here. The parent is trans, and the child is too. Clearly the child came to this decision zirself, and not because of the prompting of the parent.
So if my theory is correct, and the majority of the recent transgender cases fall into the Type B category, then would it not be logical to try and prevent these kids from dealing with the mental health issues in the first place, and potentially have to undergo the highly damaging surgery, by not glamourising it so much, and by not drawing so much attention to it? If it wasn’t being pushed so heavily, there would be much less cases of the Type B, and therefore much less children having to suffer the associated problems of struggling with their gender identity. By all means, have facilities in place to try and identify and help those who fall into the Type A category, but as things stand, the media and activists conflate both the majority Type B and the minority Type A into one category, and in my opinion, this is completely wrong.
Anyway, that was a pretty long introduction to what is in fact, a very brief article that I wished to share.
A review of Ireland’s gender recognition laws is to be brought before the Cabinet this morning.
It reportedly recommends making it easier for children to change their gender.
Commissioned by Social Protection Minister Regina Doherty, it is understood the report recommends letting children officially change their gender without going to court.
Regina Doherty, who is a high ranking member of Ireland’s Fine Gael party.
Never forget, that Fine Gael are supposed to be Ireland’s “right wing conservative party”. They brought Ireland the Gay Marriage referendum. They brought Ireland the Abortion referendum. They’ve talked about making free (ie., tax-payer funded) contraception readily available. Our current Taoiseach is best buds with that snivelling worm, Justin Trudeau. And now, we’re getting this rhetoric from them.
But yeah people are still delusional enough to think that they’re totally a right wing conservative party, because the Overton window has moved so far to the left, that full on Communists are now mainstream, and centrist parties like Fine Gael, seem far right in comparison.
Children under 16 would be allowed to register the change on documents as long as they have parental consent.
Parental consent? Oh dear that’s such an outdated attitude to have. Why should parents have any say in any life changing decisions that their children wish to make? I think maybe Leo should take some advice from how things are done in the country of his good buddy Trudeau.
It would take the decision out of the courts unless there is a situation where one parent does not consent to the change or if there are mental health concerns.
I’m sure we can guess which parent the court will side with in such a scenario.
There have been calls for the minister to publish the report findings, which will likely be done after it is noted by Cabinet this morning.
I look forward to seeing the report. Actually to be honest, I really don’t care.
I can’t see this situation ending well at all. I can see many vulnerable kids with mental health problems, being encouraged to do something that is not in their best interests at all. And then when they end up realising that they’ve made a mistake, as so many do, and feel as if suicide istheir onlyoption, because they’ve destroyed their bodies and ruined their lives, do you think those who encouraged them, are going to accept any responsibility for it? Do you think they’ll honestly reflect on their own behaviour and think “maybe it was a bad idea to encourage this”?