There are only two relevant sides in the Syrian civil war. There is the legal Syrian government, led by Bashar al-Assad. Then there are the terrorist groups, of which, ISIS is the largest and the most infamous. Now we’re all well aware of the kind of atrocities that ISIS have been committing. There are plenty of stories and videos of them beheading western hostages, throwing gay men off the top of buildings, destroying irreplaceable ancient Roman era artefacts, taking women as sex slaves, claiming responsibility for the epidemic of terrorist attacks happening all across Europe, etc. Yet despite all this, Western policy and Western media seems more interested in demonising Assad, a popular, secular, and democratically elected ruler, rather than ISIS, even though Assad is fighting against them. I’ve discussed the stupidity of the narrative surrounding Assad in this post here already.
Now if you have any critical thinking skills, you might ask yourself, “Why is this happening?”. Lets assume that Assad really is guilty of the atrocities that the West claims that he is guilty of (and just for the record, I don’t actually think he is guilty of them at all). Well, if atrocities are the reason why the West is so opposed to him, then surely ISIS have him beat in that regard, even if he really did do all the things that they’ve accused him of. There’s no logical reason to go after Assad for “committing atrocities”, while ignoring the much larger list of atrocities committed by his opponents. If atrocities were the only concern, then the logical thing to do would be to deal with the greater evil (ISIS) first, bring the Syrian civil war to an end, and then when that is done, present any evidence of Assad’s alleged atrocities to the UN Security Council and his Russian allies, and negotiate his removal this way instead.
So when you realise that there is no logical reason behind the “Assad needs to be removed because he commits atrocities” narrative, there must instead be another explanation. One of the explanations I’ve heard put forward is that the west actually supports ISIS, because Assad is allied with Iran (Israel’s greatest enemy), and taking out Assad will help isolate Iran, and therefore strengthen Israel’s position in the region. This theory is also confirmed by Wikileaks. However, you would understandably then ask the question “Why would Israel support ISIS? Aren’t they the enemies of the Jews?”
Well, going by this story taken from The Times of Israel itself, apparently not.
Former defense minister Moshe Ya’alon on Saturday said the Islamic State terrorist group in the Syrian Golan Heights “apologized” for attacking an Israeli unit.
“There was one case recently where Daesh opened fire and apologized,” Ya’alon said, using the terror group’s Arabic nickname.
Just think about this logically. Why would ISIS apologise for attacking Israeli forces, if they were enemies of Israel? They fight against the Assad forces in Syria, against Iran, and Hezbollah, all of whom are enemies of Israel. So in other words, ISIS fights the enemies of Israel, but when they accidentally attack Israeli forces, they apologise. I think it’s pretty obvious what this suggests.
This was an apparent reference to a clash that took place near the Syrian border last November, in which IDF troops exchanged fire with members of the Islamic State affiliate. After a brief gun battle, the Israeli military attacked the terrorist group with airstrikes and tank fire, killing four of them.
Israel and much of the Western world considers the Islamic State affiliate in the Syrian Golan Heights, known as the Khalid ibn al-Walid Army, to be a terrorist group. Communication with them is technically illegal under Israeli law, constituting contact with an enemy agent.
It won’t actually matter in practicality though.
Ya’alon was speaking at an event in the northern city of Afula. He was interviewed on stage by Eli Levi, a Channel 10 news correspondent.
His comment about the Islamic State’s apology was made as part of a broader point about Israel’s policy for Syria, which is largely non-interventionist.
LOL, non-interventionist, sure.
You’re not fooling anyone.
Ya’alon was explaining that Israel carries out strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces in retaliation when spillover fire hits the Israeli Golan Heights.
Golan Heights is actually internationally recognised Syrian territory, that has been illegally occupied by Israel since 1967. If they don’t want to get hit by any “spillover fire”, then they should just hand back the territory that they stole.
Ya’alon’s officer refused to elaborate on how exactly the Islamic State expressed its apology to Israel after the attack. The IDF also declined to comment.
I don’t think we’ll be getting an answer any time soon either. Something tells me that this isn’t the kind of thing he was supposed to say publicly.
Syrian officials have accused Israel of directly aiding the Islamic State and other rebel groups, a claim Jerusalem vociferously denies.
Yet we’re supposed to believe that ISIS just apologised for attacking Israeli forces, because they’re nice guys and didn’t mean to do so.
Lets really analyse the magnitude of what this all means. ISIS have claimed responsibility for pretty much every terrorist attack that has happened in the Western world the past few years. I’m not saying necessarily that they actually are responsible for them all, but the point is that they clearly support them all. Israel, which is supposedly the great ally of the Western world is supporting ISIS, because ISIS is useful to them.
Therefore, I think it’s safe to say that when you combine this latest story about them clearly working with ISIS, with everything else, that they are proving the antisemites rights about them. They are proving that they are no friend or ally to us at all. They are in fact the greatest threat facing us. Just think of it this way. They have been expelled from where they were living 109 times that we know of from recorded history. Are we really supposed to believe that all 109 times, that they were just innocent victims of irrational hatred, and never deserved what happened? Or, is it possible that they were causing problems for their host society, and the expulsion was just a backlash against them for all the trouble they were causing? Surely, 109 different groups, separated by both geography and history, can’t all have been irrational, hate filled bigots, right?
OMG, I’m actually laughing so hard right now. As I’m sure people have seen, the media has been flooded with stories about an apparent increase in hate crimes, ever since Trump became president. Just check out some of the headlines below that show up in Google searches for the term “increase hate crimes Trump”.
Most of these alleged hate crimes usually end up getting debunked very quickly and appearing on fakehatecrimes.org, a few days later. The media never gives as much attention to the debunking of course, as that doesn’t fit the narrative. Therefore, even after they do get debunked, most people still continue to believe that there is some massive epidemic of Neo-Nazi, white supremacists, committing acts of evil against minorities, in the name of Trump.
Anyway, one group that has claimed to be getting targeted a lot as of late, has been the Jews. First of all, there was the story about one of their graveyards getting vandalised. Then there was the stories about how there were dozens of bomb threats being sent to Jewish institutions. The media went into a frenzy over these “antisemitic hate crimes” and started screeching for something to be done to protect the poor innocent Jews, from all the hate they were experiencing (for absolutely no reason of course). Well, the graveyard vandalism, turned out to not be vandalism at all. But sure, the bomb threats were still real, right?
The typical “anti-semitic” hate crime, follows a very predictable trajectory. Usually, a crudely drawn swastika and hate filled message (often poorly spelled for extra effect) are found on the wall of a Jewish business or home. The media goes crazy and starts demanding something be done and there is a big moral panic over the “alarming increase in racial hatred”. A few days pass by and people start asking questions. Suddenly, holes start turning up in the original story, and this causes suspicion. Then the Jew who faked the hate crime is exposed
Israeli police say a 19-year-old man with American and Israeli citizenship is suspected of making threats against Jewish institutions worldwide.
Everyone with any understanding of these situations, predicted this would be the case. Lets just look at it logically. There were dozens of bomb threats being called in against these Jewish institutions, and there was never any actual bomb, not even once. A real antisemite wouldn’t waste time with dozens of hoaxes, because they’d know damn well that the only people who would benefit from it, are the Jews themselves, because of the victimhood points it would give them, and the fact that it could potentially have been used as an excuse to crack down on antisemites.
Police arrested the suspect in the south of Israel on Thursday morning over threats against Jewish communities in the US, New Zealand and Australia.
He was detained by Israeli cyber-fraud police, after an inquiry with the FBI and other law enforcement agencies.
Last month an ex-US journalist was arrested for several of the threats.
Yeah, that was some black guy who probably had real mental health problems (not the fake kind the media talk about every single time there’s a Muslim attack), who was more than likely just doing a copy-cat crime, after seeing all the attention the previous bomb threats got.
In fact, that was almost certainly the point in the first place. Make bomb threats against their own people, give these fake threats massive coverage in the media, and hope for some attention seeking lunatic to copy them, then blame it all on Trump and white supremacy. Too bad it was a black guy who copied it instead.
But Israeli police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said on Thursday the latest suspect’s motives are unclear.
^See above. I think I figured out the motive very easily. This is pretty common behaviour for Jews. They seem to have a natural inclination towards paranoia, and are constantly expecting the next persecution to occur, at any time. If they aren’t being persecuted, they invent persecution against themselves instead, either to justify their paranoia, and demand some kind of compensation from the rest of society, or to use it as a weapon against their enemies (Trump in this case).
In one of the threats made against a Jewish Community Center (JCC) on 18 January, a caller is heard saying: “In a short time, a large number of Jews are going to be slaughtered.
“There’s going to be a bloodbath that’s going to take place in a short time.”
I wish I could find the video again. I remember listening to it at the time, and it was blatantly obvious it was a Jew making the threat. The voice was a bit distorted, but even so, you could easily make out the stereotypical, nasally, New York Jew accent.
Imagine this voice, but distorted and making threats.
Doron Krakow, president of the JCC Association of North America, said he was “troubled” to hear the suspect is Jewish, adding that he is “hopeful” that the threats have come to an end.
We’ll just have to see. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are other Jews who were involved as well.
Investigators say the Israeli teen used camouflage technologies to disguise the origin of the dozens of calls.
“He didn’t use regular phone lines. He used different computer systems so he couldn’t be backtracked,” Mr Rosenfeld said.
Very clever. Just not clever enough, it seems.
In the US, more than 120 hoax bomb threats have been made against Jewish schools, synagogues and cultural centres since earlier January, according to the Anti-Defamation League.
And the media was having a frenzy, blaming Trump and Trump supporters for it.
There have also been at least three vandalism attacks made against US cemeteries in recent months.
At least one of which we know was caused by mother nature. I wouldn’t be surprised if the other two were vandalised for real though… but by Jews.
The teen is also suspected of making threats against Delta Air Lines, forcing a plane to make an emergency landing in 2015 in order to be searched for explosives.
Israeli’s minister of public safety Gilad Erdan congratulated the police for the arrest.
“We hope that this investigation will help shed light on some of the recent threats against Jewish institutions, which have caused great concern both among Jewish communities and the Israeli government,” he said in a statement.
There is a court order in place preventing the media from reporting the man’s name.
But not his ethnicity ^_^
He will be held under arrest until 30 March, the court ruled.
According to Israeli newspaper Haaretz, the army had refused to draft him on personal grounds, after determining that he was unfit for service.
Probably mentally unfit from the sounds of it.
A reported spike in anti-Jewish incidents led to criticism of the Trump administration, with some saying they did not react quickly or forcefully enough to the hate threats.
Which was the whole point. Fake hate crimes against themselves, then use it as an excuse to criticise Trump. It was so predictable. As soon as I heard about bomb threats being sent to Jewish institutions, I knew a Jew was behind it, just from previous cases.
Last month, the White House denounced the threats and rejected “anti-Semitic and hateful threats in the strongest terms”.
But that damn antisemite, Trump, didn’t denounce them quickly enough. Sure, didn’t you hear that Trump is apparently a Holocaust Denier , just because he didn’t specifically mention the Jews by name, in his speech commemorating the suffering of Holocaust victims? He still acknowledged that it happened of course, but just talked about all “the people” who had suffered, rather than “the Jews”. What a horrible monster he is.
It pledged to provide “support to groups affected by these incidents to enhance public safety”.
And of course, in order to provide this support, they need more funds from tax-payers, and draconian hate speech laws implemented against people who dare criticise the Jews in any way. If they don’t get this money, and these laws, we might see more fake hate crimes being committed.
I’m a day or two late posting this, but we just passed the 100th anniversary of Tsar Nicholas II’s abdication of the Russian throne. I think this is a pretty important event to remember, because this was the incident that directly preceded the rise of the scourge that is Communism, and was arguably the beginning of a series of events that led us to where we are in the world today. RT has posted a video to commemorate the event.
The comments section makes for some very interesting reading.
So yeah, noticing a bit of a theme with the comments there? An awful lot of people seem to blame “the Jews” for Communism. This sort of thing has long been considered an “antisemitic canard“, and is usually brushed off by people who hear it as nothing more than a “Nazi conspiracy theory”. Here’s the thing though, it isn’t technically inaccurate at all. There’s a lot of evidence to suggest that Jews were disproportionately responsible for Communism.
Keep in mind that even in a country like Russia, which would have had a pretty large Jewish population in comparison to other countries at that time, their population percentage was probably about 5% at best. Even that is probably a generous estimate. To be so over-represented among the leading figures in the Bolshevik party, couldn’t possibly have happened by chance.
Even, if we look at reports from that time period, it more or less confirms that it was pretty common knowledge at the time that the majority of leading Bolsheviks were Jews.
The thing is though, it doesn’t just stop with Russia. Lets also take a look at Germany for example. In my post about the Berkeley riots, I briefly made reference to the attempted Communist Revolution in Germany in 1918-1919. Take a look at the names of the leaders of the Communists.
Someone else noticed a certain pattern here as well.
Again, notice how just like in the successful Communist revolution in Russia, the unsuccessful Communist revolution in Germany was overwhelmingly led by Jews, a people who made up a very tiny percentage of both countries’ populations at the time?
Oh, but it doesn’t just stop there. It isn’t even limited to Europe. Lets take a look at China next. Yes, the leader of the Chinese Communists, was the Chinese national, Mao Zedong, but there were plenty of Jewsin positions of power in that movement as well.
And those are just a few examples. Again, for such a tiny minority, does it not seem strange to see so many of their names coming up, even moreso in regard to a country like China? Russia and Germany are one thing. At least those countries had a relatively long history of Jewish settlement, and had fairly large Jewish populations. China is something else entirely though. It makes no sense to suggest that this could just have been a coincidence.
Oh and I’m still not done yet. How about the situation in South Africa, you know, that once successful country that is gradually heading towards failed state status? Everyone is always told about how great Nelson Mandela was and if you didn’t know better, you would think he was nothing more than a peaceful protester who spent decades in prison for political reasons. In reality, he was a Communist terrorist who was willing to use violence to further his goals, and that was why he was imprisoned.
You may say that this doesn’t matter, because Apartheid was an evil system, that needed to be abolished by any means necessary. That’s a perfectly reasonable opinion to have (though personally, I reckon Apartheid South Africa was a paradise in comparison to its modern replacement). However when you consider the fact that the only Jew majority state on the planet, Israel, is an Apartheid state itself, and the Palestinians are treated far worse than the black South Africans ever were (black people flocked to South Africa during Apartheid, but nobody flocks to the Palestinian territories), it just really shows the hypocrisy that exists. I don’t believe that someone like Joe Slovo was opposed to Apartheid because he believed in “muh human rights”. I believe he was opposed to it for the same reason the Communist Jews in Russia and Germany were opposed to the systems in those countries… because he wanted to take power for himself and his own kind, and the disenfranchised blacks were a useful battering ram against the existing system, in much the same way that the working class was in Russia in 1917.
And on that note, I’d like to focus a bit more attention on this concept of using certain demographics of society as “battering rams” against the targeted culture. In the years preceding the outbreak of the First World War, it was generally believed by most Marxist intellectuals that if a great war ever broke out in Europe, that the working class all across the continent would eventually refuse to fight and would turn against the capitalists and aristocracy of their nations, in favour of pursuing their class interests instead. As we saw, that was exactly what did eventually happen In Russia, but in the rest of Europe, the people didn’t rise up at all.
So the leading Marxist intellectuals at the time had to go back to the drawing board. They needed to figure out where their theories went wrong and what should be done differently in order to lead to the global Communist revolution that they wanted. Eventually in the early 1920s, two of these leading Marxists, Antonio Gramsci of Italy (a Gentile), and Georg Lukács of Hungary (a Jew) both independently came to the conclusion that the reason why Communism failed to take off in Europe, despite the horrors of the war, was because of the strength of Christianity and Western Culture, and the loyalty that the ordinary people had to these things. People were more loyal to their culture than to do their social class. Therefore, Christianity and Western Culture needed to be undermined and eventually destroyed in order to facilitate the gradual transition towards Communism.
This concept of undermining Western Civilisation was adopted by an organisation that became known as the “Frankfurt School” and led to development of the philosophy known as “Critical Theory“. The basic concept behind critical theory was literally to analyse every single norm in society and to criticise it, in the hopes of eventually changing it. The idea behind criticising these norms, was to pathologise them, so that we would eventually be conditioned to lose faith in them, and therefore weaken our loyalty to the culture that spawned them.
By the way, if you were to look at this list of “notable theorists” who were a part of the Frankfurt School…
… with the possible exceptions of Habermas, Schmidt, and Honneth (whom I can’t find confirmation on either way), every single one of these men were Jews.
Anyway, the Frankfurt School was active in Germany in the 1920s and early 1930s. When the Nazis came to power in 1933 their members fled, mainly to America, where they became affiliated with Colombia University. After WW2, some returned to Europe, but others, including Herbert Marcuse, remained in America.
By the late 1960s, the first half of the baby boomer generation (people who were born in the few years following the end of the War and had therefore never experienced any of the hardship associated with either the war itself or the Great Depression that preceded it) were at the age were they would be attending college. Meanwhile, the remaining members of the Frankfurt School (particularly Marcuse), had at this point spent the past 30 years or so, gaining power and influence in the American academic system, and now had plenty of followers to do their bidding. Do you remember how I mentioned before how Communists uses certain demographics as battering rams to achieve their aims, and originally, the working class had been the battering ram of choice? Well, after the working class had failed to live up to expectations, and after realising that the enemy was Western culture, a new battering ram had to be found.
In previous times, the struggle had always been the “working class against the capitalists and aristocrats that exploited them”. Now, the capitalists and aristocrats had been replaced with the architects of Western Culture… straight, white, Christian, men. The working class was replaced with anyone who didn’t fit into those categories. It’s no coincidence that the black civil rights movement, second wave feminism, the gay rights movement, the anti-war movement, and the 60’s counterculture in general, all happened at roughly the same time, and all had their origins on American college campuses. It was all based on Frankfurt School Critical Theory being taught in American Academia and it was actually all about attacking the dominant straight, white, Christian demography of America, under the guise of “progressivism” and “human rights”. The baby boomer college students were the perfect useful idiots to promote it, because they had never experienced any real hardship themselves and were naive enough to buy into it.
Indeed, just to briefly focus on the the Civil Rights Movement specifically, Martin Luther King Jr. was educated in a suspected Communist institute. The real brains behind his speeches and the organisation of his events as well was the Jew, Stanley Levison. This doesn’t necessarily prove that the civil rights movement was entirely a Jewish movement to attack white America in order to bring in Communism, but once again, it’s a very strange coincidence isn’t it? Even the NAACP, an organisation which exists to promote the interests of black people, was actually founded by William English Walling (white man with Jewish wife), Mary White Ovington (white woman), and Henry Moskowitz (Jew), rather than black people. In a country where Jews make up roughly 2% of the population (probably even less at that point in time), this again is a pretty strange coincidence.
I’ve already discussed before how, Jews are widely over-represented in the feminist movement, and are also widely over-represented in the push for multiculturalism in Western societies.
Multiculturalism for everywhere… except Israel of course.
The logic behind these two moves is divide and conquer. By promoting the very worst aspects of feminism, they turn men and women against each other. Women are encouraged to think of Western culture as inherently misogynistic and sexist, and therefore become a battering ram against men. People from different cultural backgrounds (which often times actually ARE misogynistic and sexist) are imported by the millions (whether there is any need or justification for their presence or not) and they are encouraged to think of Western culture as being “racist” and full of “white privilege”. They in turn become a battering ram against the white majority. This instills a sense of guilt and shame in the white majority, and a sense of anger and entitlement in the non-white minorities.
Identity politics in general is played up based on everything you can think of: race, religion, gender, gender identity, sexuality, disability, etc., to the point were there is no unity, and people are left with little faith in the institutions of society. Even today, rather than reporting honestly on anything, the mainstream media (dominatedby Jews) fans the flames of organisations like Black Lives Matter, constantly brings up debunked feminist myths such as the “wage gap“, or tries to blame every Muslim terrorist attack on either “mental illness” or as a response to white racism, rather than on an ideology that is completely incompatible with the Western Culture that they wish to destroy. And that is the key point. Everything they currently promote: multiculturalism, globalism, identity politics, etc., is done so as part of a century long plan to destroy Western Civilisation the world over, and replace it with a form of Communism.
I kind of went off on a bit of a tangent in this post. I just saw that video and found the comments pretty interesting and wanted to discuss what they were saying in more detail. I never expected to go this far with it. Nevertheless, I hope I’ve provided an interesting read, and explained properly why the idea of “Jews being responsible for Communism” is not a conspiracy theory at all. It’s simply a historical reality.
There’s no greater humanitarian organisation on the planet than Goldman Sachs. If there’s one thing that us lowly peasants should never forget, it’s that a group of predatory, parasitic, psychopathic bankers, who have made untold billions off of human misery, are our moral superiors, and we should probably do whatever they tell us is the “right thing to do” with regards to mass immigration of hostile and incompatible people to our countries. If we don’t, that just means we’re evil, hate-filled racists, who have an irrational hatred towards their skin colour/funny accents, and any legitimate sounding reason we give for feeling the way we do, is just a lie. “You can trust us, little people, we’re your moral superiors, and we know best.”
Trump on Friday signed an executive order barring people from seven majority-Muslim countries — Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen — from entering the US. The order originally included US green-card holders, but the White House later exempted them from the ban.
All countries which were selected and listed by the Obama administration as potential terrorist hotspots, and as a major cause for concern. Why, oh why was there no such anger directed at Obama for singling out these countries for potential isolation to begin with? In fact, why was there no anger directed at him for bombing so many of these countries (Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and Syria) thus contributing to the refugee crisis in the first place?
“This is not a policy we support,” Blankfein said in the message.
“[We] are focused on supporting our colleagues and their families who may be affected.”
Here is the full text of the message:
“This is Lloyd. The president has issued an executive order that, generally, bans individuals from seven different countries from entering the United States and freezes the broader refugee program. This is not a policy we support, and I would note that it has already been challenged in federal court, and some of the order has been enjoined at least temporarily.
“If the order were to become or remain effective, I recognize that there is potential for disruption to the firm, and especially to some of our people and their families. I want to assure all of you that we will work to minimize such disruption to the extent we can within the law and are focused on supporting our colleagues and their families who may be affected.
“Let me close by quoting from our business principles: ‘For us to be successful, our men and women must reflect the diversity of the communities and cultures in which we operate. That means we must attract, retain and motivate people from many backgrounds and perspectives. Being diverse is not optional; it is what we must be.’ Now is a fitting time to reflect on those words and the principles that underlie them.”
All hollow, meaningless words. These people are soulless and inhumane monsters. They care about nobody but themselves.
If something like this doesn’t make people suspicious, I don’t know what will. I’m not in anyway suggesting that Trump is a saint himself, but if an organisation as reviled and despicable as Goldman Sachs, put their financial might behind his opponent in the election, does that not suggest the possibility that they see him as a threat to their own nefarious goals? That’s why I honestly can’t understand how all these idiotic Anarchists, Communists, and Antifa protesters, who claim to hate the banking establishment and the “one percent” or whatever other names they use to describe them, are essentially doing the bidding of Goldman Sachs by fighting against Trump every step of the way. It’s just so fucking stupid.
One of the Trump decisions that I do not approve of. I don’t believe it’s a good idea to put rats like these in positions of power. Ideally, I’d have preferred to see the likes of them being purged. My only hope is that he has them there for strategic purposes. He’s so busy battling against the political establishment and the mainstream media, that he could hardly be going up against the financial establishment as well at the same time, and he’s instead trying to keep them on side for the time being. I’m hoping he’s waiting until those other opponents are dealt with, before turning his attention towards them next. But as I said, that’s just a hope.
I have on several past occasions, discussed the common practice employed by Jews, whereby they claim to be white people themselves whenever they want to lecture “fellow white people” about how evil and racist we all are, or use peer pressure to trick us into making decisions that go against our own group interests, but will then hide behind their Jewish identity, whenever they want to feign victimhood, promote their own group interests, or avoid any angry backlash on white people, that they themselves have stirred up with the narrative they present about us. In fact, thanks to the internet, there are numerous examples of this habit that have been immortalised for all to see.
Lets take a look at a few.
Now you might say, what’s the big deal here? How is this any different than a white, Christian person talking about their Christian identity in some scenarios, while lecturing their fellow white people in other scenarios? Well it’s quite simple really. Christianity is just simply a religion. It is not a racial category, so when the white Christian talks about his Christianity, he isn’t renouncing his “whiteness” so to speak. On the other hand, there are a lot of people, includingnumerousJewsthemselves, who consider “Jew” to be their racial category, not white, regardless of how light their skin pigmentation may be. They don’t consider themselves to be white in much the same way, that Australian aborigines aren’t thought of as “black” which is the racial category that we use to describe people of Sub-Saharan African descent, regardless of how dark their skin colour may be. In the same way, white as a racial category tends to refer to people of European descent, not simply to people with light skin.
Indeed there is a lot of reason to support this idea that Jews are a distinct race as they, having evolved in the Middle East rather than Europe, and later having been isolated away in ghettos from the general population of the European countries that they settled in for centuries, were limited to breeding only with each other. Therefore, they have a distinct gene pool that separates them from white people. Jews themselves are aware of this seeing as Israel actually uses DNA tests to test whether or not a prospective citizen is a Jew or not. Surely if Jews were just followers of a particular religion, then simply converting to the Jewish faith would be enough to be considered a Jew.
So you might be wondering, why exactly I’m bringing this up right now? Well, it’s because of a rather amusing video that was posted on YouTube the other day. You know how I pointed out above some examples of Jews claiming to be white people in order to lecture “fellow white people”? Well now we can see actual footage of an example of it in action.
Check it out…
I would like to particularly draw attention to the part 15 seconds in. Notice how he gives a nervous laugh when the camera man asks him if he’s Jewish? It’s as if he’s thinking to himself “Oh shit, my cover is blown”. It’s absolutely incredible to see because it’s almost exactly what leading Nazi, Joseph Goebbels says happens when they are exposed like this.
It’s very interesting to see him claiming to be representing “white men against Trump”, despite being a Jew, when you take into consideration the respective percentages of white men and Jews who voted for him.
This guy was attempting to promote his own Jewish interests, but to disguise it as the actions of a “white man” when doing so. It’s one thing for a group to promote their own interests, but to do so using deception and trickery, and making it look as if they’re part of another group entirely, is as low as it gets. And believe me, he knew exactly what he was doing, if his nervous laugh upon getting called out on it is anything to go by. If ever you see a Jew attempting to shame us into following policies that you think are at odds with our own group interests, it is probably a good idea to remember this video, and to remember this little piece of advice…
So Donald Trump made a big speech recently, in which he pointed out the completely obvious reality that there are powerful forces in the world who use their control of various important institutions in our societies, to try and influence political decisions in ways that favour them. Even for someone who isn’t a big follower of current affairs, this statement should just simply be common sense, just from looking at the way the world works. Whether it’s starting wars, allowing mass immigration from incompatible cultures, bank bailouts, the implementation of unfair taxes and laws etc., we constantly see establishment politicians making decisions which are the exact opposite of what the majority of their voters want from them. It would make absolutely no sense to make such universally unpopular decisions, unless there were powerful people in control of these politicians, who somehow benefited from these decisions. We’ve heard many terms used to describe these figures: Globalists, Illuminati, the One Percent, etc., but there’s one specific group of people, who were greatly offended by Trump’s speech.
Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblattwarned on Twitter Thursday that Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump‘s rhetoric was bordering on tropes historically used to ferment hatred of Jews.
In a Thursday speech, Trump argued that Hillary Clinton “meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty,” in order to enrich “global international powers,” an apparent reference to her paid Wall Street speeches. He added that “media enablers [wield] control over this nation through means that are very well known.”
Greenblatt argued in a tweet that the notion that “international bankers” and the media were secretly planning the destruction of America is dangerously close to common anti-Semitic claims.
The speech itself.
Strange really isn’t it. I haven’t watched the full speech myself yet, because of how long it is, but from everything I’ve read up on it, apparently Trump never actually mentioned the word “Jew” at all. He just made vague references to a powerful group of elites who control international finance, establishment politics, and the media, and that they use their power and influence to push forward with agendas which benefit themselves and their inner circles, at the expense of the general population. Agendas such as mass third world immigration to the first world, globalisation, pointless wars, and relentless propaganda campaigns against anything which could be a threat to their goals (such as Brexit and the possibility of a Trump presidency). Yet even though he never once mentioned Jews apparently, the Jewish run ADL is accusing him of anti-Semitism, simply for pointing out the very obvious reality, that there are powerful people conspiring to push unpopular and destructive agendas which benefit themselves only.
If that’s the case, then by saying that these comments about a group of unnamed powerful people is “anti-Semitic” is that not essentially an admission on their part, that these unnamed powerful people are in fact Jews?
At the end of my most recent post, I briefly discussed the disproportionately high number of Jews who are involved in promoting multiculturalism in the west (but not Israel of course), stirring up racial tension and hatred towards white people from non-whites and feelings of white guilt within whites, all while claiming to be white themselves when it suits them to do so, and disavowing their whiteness in favour of their Jewishness when that suits them instead. Well today I’ve found a story about another prominent Jew, one who runs an “anti-racist” organisation in Germany, which she uses to try and shut down people who try to promote the interests of ethnic Germans. It seems this woman has run afoul of the right wing “AFD” party, which has been steadily gaining in popularity in Germany, following Merkel’s disastrous fuck ups
BERLIN — Days before a closely watched regional election in Germany, a leading member of the nationalist party Alternative for Germany launched an attack on a prominent Jewish activist, calling Wednesday for the anti-racism organization she heads to be shut down.
Does nobody else not think it’s strange how so many of these “anti-racist” organisations in western countries are all run by a group that usually only makes up a tiny percentage of the population of the country they are in? There’s no way that this is just happening by chance. According to these figures, Jews make up about 0.15% of Germany’s population. It isn’t just some weird coincidence, that just like in America, (where they make up roughly 2% of the population), that it always seems to be members of this tiny group who are the ones lecturing everyone else about what is and isn’t acceptable behaviour in their own countries.
European lawmaker Beatrix von Storch, who leads the Berlin chapter of Alternative for Germany, lashed out online at the Amadeu Antonio Foundation over a brochure that described her party as far-right and populist. Von Storch called for the “plug to be pulled” on the foundation because of the brochure, which provides guidance on how to respond to her party.
We can’t have the German people voting for a political party that looks out for the interests of the German people. We need to find a way to stop this party, and limit them to a small spectrum of acceptable parties that puts the interests of everyone other than the German people first. That’s democracy for you.
Known by its German acronym AfD, the party has polled strongly ahead of elections in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania amid popular discontent over Chancellor Angela Merkel’s refugee policy.
How dare those German people feel anger towards Merkel for inviting the entire third world to live in Germany on welfare, rape women and children, and murder German citizens in the street? They’re all clearly just racists, who hate the migrants because of the colour of their skin, and not for any logical reason.
Von Storch, the granddaughter of Nazi Germany’s finance minister, attacked the foundation’s chairwoman, Anetta Kahane, calling her a “Stasi-aunt.” Kahane has acknowledged being one of 200,000 unpaid informants of East Germany’s secret police, or Stasi, from 1974 to 1982, before becoming a political dissident.
So this woman was literally an informer to the East German secret police. And the worst thing is, she wasn’t even doing it because she was paid to do it. She was a true believer, who informed on other people simply because she wanted to. Why should a woman like this have the right to decide what is and isn’t acceptable opinions to hold in a supposedly free and democratic society? She would probably gladly do the same thing now to people she disagrees with if she could. To be honest, they really aren’t that far off going back to those dark old days in Germany right now. Germany is already having social media monitor and report people who post so called “hate speech” (ie. truth) against migrants, and are even willing to take kids away from their parents, if these parents say things that they aren’t supposed to. We’re quickly seeing Europe regress to a level of tyranny not seen since the fall of communism.
A foundation representative, Timo Reinfrank, accused von Storch of trying to portray herself as a victim ahead of regional elections at the weekend.
“Unfortunately AfD politicians show time and again how well-founded our efforts to preserve the culture of democratic debate are,” he said.
Oh the irony.
“We want to preserve the culture of democratic debate”
“Lets do what we can to shut down a political party, whose ideology we don’t approve of.”
The Amadeu Antonio Foundation has frequently been attacked by far-right groups.
In July, members of a far-right group known as the Identitarian Movement stormed its office demanding to see Kahane.
Reinfrank said at the time that the attacks on Kahane had become particularly “aggressive and often anti-Semitic.”
Hmm I wonder why they would be anti-Semitic? Could it be possible that they too are noticing the pattern that seems to be occurring?
No goyim, it’s just an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that Jews are flooding the west with third world immigrants, and silencing dissent against it, in order to see the indigenous European people overrun and go extinct. Besides, such a thing, if it where to actually happen, would be good, as this German Jew politician points out.