There’s a term over on Urban Dictionary which aptly describes the state of affairs we live in. That term is “Clown World”. The very first definition provided goes like this:
A phrase used to describe the current state of affairs in regards to the world (usually socially or politically). The word is employed as to state that something is ridiculous or nonsensical, in a way, “only could this be real, in a world run by clowns (clown world)”
When you read today’s topic can you really deny that this is the case?
The UK Home Office is reported to have refused asylum to a Christian convert by quoting Bible passages which it says prove Christianity is not a peaceful religion.
No, this isn’t a story from The Onion. The UK, a country which has suffered numerous Islamic terrorist attacks over the past few years, has seen knife attacks skyrocket in their capital city as it has become more diverse, and has seen the exposure of countless Muslim child rape gangs, is rejecting a Christian asylum seeker, because Christianity is not a peaceful religion. Forget the fact that the UK has always historically been a Christian society, and is still majority Christian today. Forget the fact that this is a country that jails people for Facebook posts which make similar comments about Islam. Even independent of all that, this is complete and utter insanity.
Well you thought wrong. Haven’t you ever heard of the Crusades?
However, the Home Office demurred, sending him a refusal letter referencing the Bible. The letter said the book of Revelations – the final book of the Bible – is “filled with imagery of revenge, destruction, death and violence,” and cites six excerpts from it.
I’d imagine those six excerpts were something along the lines of
“As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”
“Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.
“And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…”
“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”
“(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels… “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”
“If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”
Oh wait, those are from the Quran, that peaceful book. My mistake.
It then states: “These examples are inconsistent with your claim that you converted to Christianity after discovering it is a ‘peaceful’ religion, as opposed to Islam which contains violence, rage and revenge.”
As if looking at the current state of the world wasn’t evidence enough already that Christianity is a peaceful religion, in comparison to Islam. Ignore your lying eyes everyone. The media and political establishment will tell you what’s actually true.
The Independent contacted the Home Office, which said the letter was “not in accordance” with its policy approach to claims based on religious persecution. It also said it was working to improve the training provided to decision-makers on religious conversion.
“The people aren’t fully broken yet. Lets pretend we’re doing something, until we’re sure that the no longer have any resistance in them.”
Nathan Stevens, the asylum seeker’s caseworker, tweeted: “I’ve seen a lot over the years, but even I was genuinely shocked to read this unbelievably offensive diatribe being used to justify a refusal of asylum.”
Get used to it. When Islam is inevitably the biggest religion in the UK, not only will this become the norm, but every native Christian will either be butchered or forced to convert. Just like what always happens.
Two days ago, Ireland had a referendum to remove the criminal offence of blasphemy from our constitution. It was an ineffective amendment, under which nobody had actually been charged in over 150 years, but there was a principle involved, and that principle is freedom of speech. Regardless of how ineffective it was, the fact is, Ireland still technically had a a constitutional amendment in place that in theory, put limits on our freedom of speech. So naturally, anyone who seriously values freedom of speech (which I do), was in favour of repealing it. Although turnout was rather poor, of those who did come out, a huge majority voted in favour of its repeal, suggesting that the majority support freedom of speech.
The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) has welcomed the Yes vote in the referendum on blasphemy as an important step for free speech and the modernisation of our democracy.
I agree. There’s no place in any modern day, free society, for laws that place restriction on a person’s freedom of speech. I too, welcome this result.
ICCL campaigned for a Yes vote in this referendum and we have consistently advocated this change over many years. This positive result brings Ireland into line with international best practice in human rights, as called for by the UN Human Rights Committee.
Echoing the recommendations of the Constitutional Convention, we are now calling on the government to repeal sections 36 and 37 of the Defamation Act 2009 which define the criminal offence of blasphemy.
They’re coming across very reasonable so far, aren’t they? Watch how that changes in the next paragraph.
We are also calling on the Government to take immediate action to coordinate state bodies’ responses to hate- and hostility-based crime and to bring forward legislation to protect from hate- and hostility-based crime.
And there it is. They talk a big game about how they value freedom of speech, but really what they mean is, they value freedom of speech that they personally agree with. Within 24 hours of the result of a referendum, ostensibly in favour of improving Ireland’s freedom of speech, they’re calling for legislation that will make free speech even more restrictive, all while claiming to celebrate free speech. It’s a literal real world example of Orwellian doublethink.
Executive Director of the ICCL, Liam Herrick, said:
“During our campaign for a Yes vote, our guiding principle was respect for freedom of expression.
You mean freedom of expression that you and your organisation personally agree with.
However, we have also argued that the right to free speech is not absolute
No you fucking prick, the whole point of free speech is that it is absolute. Once you put restrictions on it, it’s no longer “free”. Therefore it’s not “free speech”. This is not a difficult concept to understand.
and should be limited to the degree necessary to protect people from hate- and hostility-motivated crime.
All crimes by definition, involve hostility. And the victim suffers the same, no matter what. It shouldn’t matter whether the victim is LGBT or straight. Black or white. Male or female. Native Irish or immigrant. Christian or Muslim, etc., etc. If they’re an innocent person, who has been victimised by a criminal act, they all deserve the same justice, for the same type of crime. Creating a victimhood hierarchy, were certain demographics, receive harsher sentences than others, or certain victims get more justice than others, is objectively a ridiculous and divisive way to do things. But of course, we already have the precedent from other countries, to know what this is really all about. it’s not about protecting minorities. It’s about punishing dissidents who speak out against the genocide that is being inflicted upon us.
Hate crime is something which is entirely different to blasphemy as it is directed towards individuals or groups, rather than ideas or institutions. There is no legislation in place to deal with hate crime in Ireland at the moment.”
And there shouldn’t ever be. There should be equally severe sentences, regardless of the demographics involved in crime. A black guy who beats up a white guy, should get the same sentence as a white guy who beats up a black guy. A Muslim who murders a Christian, should get the same sentence as a a Christian who murders a Muslim. And a person who expresses their personal opinion on Islam, and the people who follow it, should get absolutely no sentence at all, same as those who express their opinion on Christianity and its followers.
Ireland is obliged by European and international human rights law to have in place a robust framework to respond to and prevent hate- and hostility-based crime.
Yet another reason to leave the EU.
In April ICCL released a report which showed that Ireland is seriously deficient in addressing hate crime when compared to other EU member States.
No doubt, we’ll be falling over ourselves to play catch up, as quickly as possible. I can honestly see Ireland going “full Sweden”, the way things are going.
The Lifecycle of a Hate Crime: Country Report for Ireland shows that from the point at which a victim reports a crime to An Garda Síochána to the point at which a judge sentences an offender, the hate element of a crime is filtered out of the criminal justice process.
And I’ve still yet to see an explanation as to why it should be.
Though it won’t matter. You can be sure that the majority of our treacherous politicians, would be more than happy to oblige, and bring in laws that restrict our ability to speak out against what they’re doing to us.
Following recent events such as a man being charged with a hate crime for teaching his pug Roman salutes, a convicted paedophile getting his sentence delayed to go on holiday, and the arrest of Tommy Robinson, simply for reporting on a court case involving Muslim child rape gangs, I made the suggestion that the United Kingdom (now commonly known as “Cuck Island“), was a contender to Sweden’s throne for the most shameful, laughing stock in all of Europe. Well after what I have just learned today, I have to take it back. There is still some will to live left in the Brits, and it looks as if they have finally reached the limits of their patience.
If you’re wondering what I’m referring to, then please watch the following videos.
And my favourite video of all…
And these are all just a small sample of what’s happening. I’m not even counting the videos that show what is happening inside prisons (it’s basically just more of the same).
Look ideally, I would like it if all European countries existed under a system of law and order, were suspected criminals were properly investigated by the authorities, given a fair trial if enough evidence was found to justify trying them, and if found guilty, given an appropriate sentence, depending on the severity of their crimes.
But the UK has failed miserably in that regard. Or rather, I don’t know if you can really refer to it as a “failure”, when it was done that way on purpose, but I’m sure you know what I mean. For the past four decades or so in the UK, there has been an epidemic of young white English girls being groomed, raped, and tortured by men of a primarily Muslim background, with the authorities not only failing to do anything about it, but actively helping to conceal it from the general public. Instead, they’ve been focusing their time and effort on punishing those who speak the truth about what has been happening. This isn’t simple incompetence. This is a massive betrayal of the people they are sworn to protect and serve.
So with the proper channels failing to protect these children, is it really that hard to understand why the ordinary, working class, white Brits, are feeling as if they have no other choice, but to take justice into their own hands? If the police and justice system won’t protect them, then they’ll protect themselves. If the police and justice system won’t punish these rape gangs, then they’ll punish them themselves. You might not agree with their methods, but they’ve been pushed into this situation against their will, and they obviously feel like this is the only option left to them. And personally, I really can’t blame them one bit.
While it is sad to see that things have gotten this far, it is promising to know, that people haven’t given up the will to fight back entirely. While I do unfortunately think that we’re long past the point of finding a peaceful solution to the problems facing Europe, I at least take solace knowing that when shit does inevitably hit the fan, that people won’t just lay down and die. They will resist afterall. And as long as people are willing to resist, there’s still hope.
We keep hearing about how the world is progressing. But progressing towards “what” exactly? To me, it seems as if the world is getting a whole lot worse, rather than better, and if this latest story is anything to go by, it seems that a lot of young people in America agree with me.
The rate of children and teens thinking about or attempting suicide has soared in the last decade, with hospitalizations doubling between 2008 and 2015.
2008-2015. Notice anything about those years? Well someone in the comments section sure did.
Now I’m not going to say that this rise can be blamed on Obama specifically, because correlation =/= causation. However, I want to take people back to 2008. The result of the 2008 election was portrayed to the public as offering…
…after the disastrous eight years under Bush. Sure the worst financial crisis since the 1929 Great Depression was only just beginning, but there was still a lot of optimism, that things would get better, and that society was progressing. The election of Obama was a symbol of that expected progress. But here we are almost a decade later, and all that hope was for nothing. I don’t blame Obama specifically for that, but I can’t deny that things did not turn out the way the majority of us were expecting.
The American Academy of Pediatrics recently published a study of children and teen hospitalizations related to suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SA). They found that in 2008, 0.8 percent of hospitalizations at surveyed children’s hospitals were for suicide attempts and thoughts. In 2015, it was 1.82 percent.
Wow so it actually more than doubled then.
It’s a significant increase that affected all age groups in the study of people 17 and under. The older age groups had higher rates of SI and SA than younger groups.
Dr. Gregory Plemmons, of the Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt University, told CBS News that depression and anxiety were rising among kids and teens, and that social media could be making it worse.
I don’t think social media is the main culprit somehow, though I’ll wait until the end, before I provide my own theories.
Mainstream media may also play a role in affecting suicide rates. In the past, media coverage of celebrity suicides was linked to increased suicides among the public—so much so that there are written media guidelines on how to avoid killing your readers. The Netflix series 13 Reasons Why was criticized by suicide prevention experts as dangerous and glamorizing teen suicide. After the first season of the show, Google searches for “teen suicide,” “suicide hotline” and “how to commit suicide” spiked.
This still doesn’t explain why these young people are feeling so depressed and anxious in the first place, that they would even consider suicide an option. It doesn’t matter how much you “glamorize” it, mentally healthy people, do not start killing themselves. There are obviously problems which are causing them to feel suicidal in the first place, problems which clearly got much worse between the years 2008 and 2015, and probably beyond that timeframe as well. Blaming the mainstream media and social media, seems to be about diverting away from the real causes.
The National Institute of Health encourages parents and physicians to know the warning signs of suicidal thoughts and take action. It recommends that doctors ask their patients if they are thinking about suicide, taking those thoughts seriously and restricting access to items they could use to kill themselves, like guns. The organization also suggests that doctors help such patients connect with resources like suicide hotlines and follow up later.
All very good advice, but it ultimately seems to be about managing the damage, rather than preventing the damage in the first place.
So anyway, I said earlier on that I was going to provide my own theory as to why this is happening, so here it is. The increasing rate of youth suicide attempts is not an isolated phenomenon. It’s just one of many symptoms of a society that is rapidly heading towards collapse. Other symptoms of this collapse include, but are not limited to:
Mass unemployment and underemployment.
Lack of job security for those who do still have jobs / Gig Economy.
Houses being completely unaffordable, even for a couple who both work, each earning the average industrial wage.
High taxation, without any visible improvement in services. In fact in many ways, services have actually gotten worse.
People lacking a sense of community and camaraderie. General sense of isolation and alienation.
A decrease in law and order (for genuine criminals)
At the same time, an increase in persecution of the otherwise law abiding for frivolous reasons (commonly referred to as anarcho-tyranny).
Terrorist attacks happening on a frequent basis.
Natives being ethnically displaced in their own countries by invaders, that are being helped by their own governments.
(In America specifically) Mass shootings happening on a much more regular basis, even though gun laws haven’t gotten any more liberal in the same time period.
An increase in racial tensions and conflict.
Mental illnesses not only being normalised, but celebrated, and with demands that everyone else deny their own perception of reality and celebrate them as well (eg, recognising dozens of fictional genders with punishments for those who refuse to).
Obesity and the associated health risks on the rise.
Degenerate modern “art”.
Young people learning about sex from hardcore pornography.
Said young people becoming addicted to pornography, which warps their ideas and expectations on sex.
Terrible dynamics between males and females, resulting in both ending up lonely, unhappy, and resentful towards the other (ie. “cat ladies” and “MGTOW/Incels”).
A huge number of marriages that end in divorce, destroying the lives of at least one of the spouses, and any children involved.
Plenty of others that I can’t think of right now off the top of my head.
So when you look at all these problems that are effecting every Western country, is it not easy to understand “why” we’re seeing such a massive increase in suicides? The Obama years really seemed to kick things up a gear, in regards to many of the aforementioned problems, not just in America, but also here in Europe. We keep hearing about all the social/political developments that have taken place such as:
Mass immigration from vastly different cultures than our own
A media which tells only one side of the story on important issues.
Children being raised in daycare, because both parents have no other choice but to work
…and many other developments, have been sold to us as “good things” and “progress”. But the evidence seems to suggest the opposite. If the majority of peoples lives are worse off than ever, then how can any of this be progress? It makes no sense. That is, until you look at it from the perspective, that this is exactly how it’s supposed to be going. That all this “progress” is working how it was actually intended. That is, it was never intended to make things better. It was actually always about harming us.
Yes, it’s that time again. A time when I take screenshots of the insanity that is currently plaguing society, just to give an overview of what we’re dealing with. I figured it has been a while since my last post in this series, so I may as well get another one out. Anyway, lets get on with it.
And that’s it for now, but there will be more parts coming in the future.
Wow, it’s been quite a while since my last time posting anything. As it stands, I’m still feeling a little bit burned out, and with little desire to talk about any topics in particular (though who knows, when the inspiration will hit me again?). However, I still want to get some content out, so I’ll do what I always do, whenever I’m going through one of these phases. I’m going to do another post in my “A small sample of what we’re up against” series, in which I take screenshots of crazy things that have been said, which serve as examples of just how bad things have gotten in the world. To see my most recent post in this series, please click here.
And that’s it for now. Though of course, there will definitely be more posts in this series in the future. Plenty of more material to come.
There are a lot of countries in the Western world competing in the race to be the first to commit national suicide. There’s the United Kingdom. There’s Belgium. There’s Germany. There’s Canada. Then of course, there’s my own personal pick to win, Sweden. However there are occasionally times when I question if Sweden really is the front-runner in the race. Don’t get me wrong, that doesn’t happen very often. Usually whenever I start to doubt Sweden’s commitment to destroying itself the quickest, they manage to outdo themselves, and remind me as to why they’re my pick. However, after reading this latest story from France, another top contender in this race, I’m really considering the possibility that I may have put my money on them to win (if you can really call it “winning”) instead.
This is basically a surrender, exactly what the French are infamous for. He’s outright admitting that the multicultural plan has failed miserably, by making this statement.
Professor Christian de Moliner admits that an independent society has formed within France, which he described as: “A branch that wants to settle their lives on religious values and is fundamentally opposed to the liberal consensus on which our country was founded.
And the obvious answer to this problem would be to discontinue immigration from the kinds of people who make up this “independent society”, and then round up the ones already in the country, and deport them to a country better suited for their ideology. But of course we can’t do that, or people might call us names, and as we all know, being called names is far worse than having our homelands stolen from us.
“We can never convert the 30% of Muslims who demand the introduction of sharia law to the merits of our democracy and secularism.
“But we also can’t deport them to a country which practices Sharia law, because that would be barbaric.”
“We are now allowing segregation to take place that does not say its name. Rather than veil the face or adopt unimaginable measures in democracy (remigration, forced evictions of the most radical), why not establish a dual system of law in France?”
He literally said that deporting cultural aliens back to their countries of origin, no matter how radical they are in their beliefs, is “unimaginable”. Can you see why I’m seriously considering that France may be overtaking Sweden in this race to national suicide?
De Moliner writes that Emmanuel Macron’s Presidential election victory will not solve the problems, but will only postpone them.
“We will never be able to eradicate the radical Islamism,” he says, adding: “While we are not yet at open war, the faithful of the Prophet are already regrouping in areas sometimes governed by special rules.”
They’re waiting for the demographic balance to shift in their favour, before they go to open war. Seeing as their birthrates are higher than that of the native French population, it’s only a matter of time. Once there are enough of them, the open war will begin.
His “solution” is to create a “state inspired by colonial Algeria and Mayotte of the twentieth century: one territory, one government, but two peoples: the French with the usual laws and Muslims with Qur’anic status (but only for those who choose it).
Brilliant idea. Model your modern, democratic, technologically advanced society, on a backward colony from a century ago.
“The latter will have the right to vote unlike the natives of colonial Algeria, but they will apply Sharia in everyday life, to regulate matrimonial laws (which will legalize polygamy) and inheritance.
“They will no longer apply to French judges for disputes between Muslims, but to Qadis. On the other hand, conflicts between Christians and believers will remain the responsibility of ordinary courts.
It’s not just “multiculturalism” now, but “multilegalism” as well. One law for the French. Another law for the Muslim invaders. I wonder will they go ahead and legalise the right for them to throw gay people off of roofs and take sex slaves, seeing as this would be in line with their beliefs?
“This system would involve schools or hospitals reserved for believers and therefore the creation of local committees that will manage them independently. A council of ulemas will fix the religious law, but the autonomy will stop there,” de Moliner hopes.
“It is obviously out of the question that an embryonic Muslim government is settling in France.
“But instead of doing the sensible thing of nipping it in the bud by removing these people before they have the chance to take over, we’re just going to willingly surrender a large chunk of our territory to them. Anything else would be wrong.”
“This system worked without too many problems from 1890 to 1940 in Algeria.”
Isn’t that great, French people? Instead of living in 21st century France, you get to live in 1890-1940 Algeria instead. Doesn’t that sound exciting?
We live in a decaying society. All over the Western world, economic prospects are bleak. Good jobs, which pay a decent wage, and which are fulfilling to do, are few and far between, with rapidly increasing automation only going to make this even worse as time goes by. Affordable housing is an unobtainable fantasy for most young people these days. In Europe, the Barbarians are at our gates, and are actually being welcomed in with open arms, predictable consequences for doing so be damned. In America, racial tensions are the worst they’ve been in almost half a century. Terrorist attacks are happening so regularly, that they barely get any attention anymore, unless they have an exceptionally high body count. Gender relations are completely out of whack, with divorces on the rise, an inability for people to make relationships work at all, and with many men just giving up on them entirely, turning to pornography, masturbation, and soon, sex robots, as an alternative. We live in an absolute nightmare.
On some level, most people know that things aren’t right, and look for distractions from it all. This is nothing unusual, and has been a pretty common occurrence in societies on the verge of collapse. The Romans had a term for it, “Bread and Circuses”. Basically, the Romans had figured out that as long as the people weren’t going hungry, and had some form of entertainment to take their minds off of things, that they could be appeased, and the real problems facing the empire would be ignored. Of course ignoring the problems doesn’t make them go away, so Rome eventually collapsed under their weight, circa 476 AD.
Things really aren’t that much different today. Society is going to hell, but people have plenty of “circuses” to keep them pacified. Movies, TV, professional sports, social media, videogames, etc., etc., all fulfill this role in the modern world. However, I’ve noticed a very interesting phenomenon that has been taking place in recent years. The whole point of the circuses is to distract people from the problems that are all around them, a temporary respite from them, if you will.
In other words, they’re supposed to be a safe haven from, not a reminder of these problems, because if they remind people of the problems, they lose all effectiveness as a distraction from them. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing happening these days. The problems people are trying to distract themselves from, are becoming conflated with the distractions themselves.
Lets take sports as our first example, specifically, the NFL in America. As I already mentioned, professional sports are a perfect example of the modern equivalent to the Roman games, and if anything, are probably the closest thing to them. The NFL was a very popular distraction for many Americans from the everyday problems that they face, or at least they were until…
So for those who are unaware, the NFL is currently being plagued by massive and very public controversy. Many black players are choosing to kneel, rather than standing in respect when the national anthem is being played. Their reason for doing this is to protest against alleged racial injustices that black people supposedly face in America. This of course serves as a reminder of the problem that is America’s increasingly poor race relations, a problem that people would rather distract themselves from. So can you imagine how this must look to white NFL fans who see this happening? They’re ordinary, working class people, dealing with problems of their own, that they wish to distract themselves from, and they turn on the TV and see a bunch of millionaires, paid to play a sport they probably enjoy playing anyway, whining about how oppressed they are, and how privileged their audience is. How do you suppose that has gone down with the audience?
So the NFL has actually gone from being America’s most popular sport, to its least popular, directly as a result of these protests. People didn’t watch the NFL to be lectured to, and to be reminded about the problems in their society. They watched it as a distraction, and now that that distraction is gone, they’re tuning out instead.
But hey, it’s not just the NFL that is failing in its duty as a distraction for the masses. There’s plenty of other forms of entertainment doing the same thing. Look at late night, comedian, talk show hosts like Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, John Oliver, etc. Ever since Trump came along, he has pretty much made up the entirety of their acts. Now I’m not saying that it’s anything unusual for comedians to take shots at political figures, and I certainly don’t think that Trump should be exempt from their ridicule. There’s definitely a lot of material to work with there. The problem is, they aren’t simply mocking Trump himself. They’re mocking his base, his supporters, the people who voted for him. That’s 63 MILLION people that they’re attacking. It’s quite possible that many of these 63 million people were at one point, viewers of one or more of these comedians. Do you think they’re still fans now after having been labeled as “racists”, “misogynists”, “dumb rednecks” etc., simply for voting for what they felt was the better choice for themselves and their families? I would be shocked if they are.
Why would any of these people tune in to distract themselves from the problems in their lives, if they know they’re just going to be mocked and insulted by the hosts? What is the benefit to them? There are two other notable examples of entertainment media that I can think of off the top of my head, which are having similar problems. Video games, and comics.
Long considered refuges for geeks and nerds, in the western world at least, video games and comics have both generally been most popular with males, particularly white ones. Most of the most popular super-heroes have historically been white males and this makes sense when you consider the fact that most of them were created in America, back when America was still somewhere between 85 and 90 percent white. That’s not to say that there hasn’t been female and racial minority super-heroes as as well, but the most popular ones of all, such as Batman, Superman, Spider-man, Iron Man, Captain America, etc., have all been white men. Similarly, popular video-games have usually had white male protagonists, because these are more relatable to the biggest target market, but again, plenty of exceptions exist.
In recent years however, there have been attacks on these two industries from outside. People who aren’t even fans of them have whined about how “noninclusive” “racist” and “sexist” they are, and have demanded changes to better suit their own tastes. One of the two big comic publishers, Marvel, has done exactly that. Rather than do the sensible thing of better promoting their existing female and racial minority characters, or creating brand new heroes altogether, they took the approach of taking their most beloved and popular characters, with decades of history and reader attachment, and either replaced them, or made drastic changes to them. Lets take a look at some of these changes that they’ve made the past few years.
That’s just off the top of my head. These changes have not been well received by long time Marvel fans, and Marvel is aware of this. They try to frame it as if the fans are just a bunch of bigots who can’t accept diversity, but is this really the case? Nobody had any problems with racial minority characters such as Black Panther or Blade, nor did they have any problems with the many female super-heroes that have appeared on teams like the X-Men or the Avengers over the years. Over at their rivals, DC, nobody ever had a problem with Wonder Woman, the black Green Lantern, John Stewart, or the gay super-hero, Midnighter. Diversity was never the problem, because diversity has always existed to some extent in comics. The problem is that they’re replacing beloved and popular characters that fans are emotionally invested in, and then making derogatory comments about the fans when they speak out against it. And sure enough, their sales have declined, and they’re blaming the fans, rather than themselves for this.
With regards to videogames, there’s too much for me to even cover. I’d just suggest reading up on the “Gamergate Controversy” to get a superficial idea of what’s been happening there. Of course, there’s a lot more to the story than what is being reported there. There’s always the Encylopedia Dramatica article on the topic, if you want to get the other side of the story.
Seeing this infestation of politics, social conflicts, and other problems into what are supposed to be distractions from these issues could have an interesting effect on how people react. The whole reason for bread and circuses is to pacify the masses so that they don’t pay attention to actual problems, and demand real solutions to them. But if these distractions stop working, and people no longer feel that they have a safe haven from these problems, then what are they supposed to do? How can they be kept pacified? Could we perhaps be on the verge of seeing a big awakening soon? I sure hope so.
In case it isn’t obvious, I’m suffering from a very severe case of writer’s block at the moment. I guess I’m just getting fed up constantly writing about the same kinds of insanity happening over and over again. I feel as if I’m just covering the same ground with every post, and that really effects my motivation to write anything.
Nevertheless, I do still want to keep making posts, as I enjoy doing this blog, so today I’m going to do what I always do, whenever I’m going through a drought of content. I’m going to post another batch of content that I’ve taken from the TumblrInAction reddit board, just to give you an insight into the kind of insanity that we’re dealing with in this world. If you want to see my previous posts on this topic, please click here, to see part 3, and from there, you can find the links to parts 1 and 2.
Anyway, that’s it for now, but I can assure you, there will be a part 5 at some stage.
I’ve jokingly referred to Western universities as “Marxist re-education centres” in the past. Anyone who has seen what goes on there should understand why. However, it seems that some Marxist ideologues, aren’t willing to wait until their targets are in university, before commencing with the brainwashing. They’d rather get to the kids while they’re still in school.
The New York City Department of Education is investigating a taxpayer-funded secondary school principal in Brooklyn for allegedly promoting communism and recruiting students for radical political causes.
If there’s one thing the world needs more of, it’s attempts to implement Communism. Sure, it has been an abject failure, resulting in millions of deaths, every single time it has been attempted before, but eventually, it’s sure to work out well. We just have to keep on trying, and eventually we’ll get it right.
The New York City education department initiated its investigation into Bloomberg’s alleged communist and communist-recruitment activities based on a tip from someone who remains anonymous.
Probably afraid of suffering retaliation for speaking out. And really, who can blame them with how unhinged those Antifa, Communist scum have become as of late?
The tipster told officials that Bloomberg is affiliated with the Progressive Labor Party, a revolutionary communist political party based in Brooklyn.
Court documents filed by the education department say that the investigation is focused on allegations that Bloomberg has worked to promote the agenda of the Progressive Labor Party by recruiting students “to participate in organizational activities, including marches for her political organization.”
According to the Progressive Labor Party’s website, the group seeks to foment violent revolution. “Only the dictatorship of the working class — communism — can provide a lasting solution to the disaster that is today’s world for billions of people. This cannot be done through electoral politics, but requires a revolutionary movement and a mass Red Army led by PLP.”
It’s amazing that this sort of thing has been tried countless times already over the past century, and every single time that it has, it has always made things even worse for the “working class” that it’s supposed to help. Mass arrests and incarceration. Food shortages. Slave labour. Torture and executions. It’s always the same. I actually wonder at times, how many of these people who push for this are just evil, totalitarian brutes, who know this and simply don’t care, and how many are just naive idiots who have no knowledge of what has already happened..
Also: “Communism means the Party leads every aspect of society. For this to work, millions of workers — eventually everyone — must become communist organizers. Join Us!”
That’s because it has to control everything, because it’s completely at odds with human nature. If the party didn’t control everything, nobody would go along with it, because it is such a stupid system that no sane person would willingly participate in.
The Progressive Labor Party “fights to destroy capitalism and the dictatorship of the capitalist class” by organizing “workers, soldiers and youth into a revolutionary movement for communism.”
“Destroy a dictatorship”
“Implement a different dictatorship”
Court documents filed by New York City’s education department allege that students who disagree with Bloomberg and her comrades “are not allowed to express” their political views.
Of course not, because in a fair and honest debate, they wouldn’t be able to justify their belief system at all. There’s no logic or sanity to it, and if people were allowed to have an open discussion about it, it would be torn apart with ease, hence why they have to silence opinions that are critical of them. It’s the same reason why the Antifa scum use violence and intimidation against people they consider “fascists”. It’s because the “fascists” have logic and reason on their side and would easily win a debate, so the Antifa use violence, rather than logic to support their belief system.
In addition, the school district says, Bloomberg and her husband used footage of Park Slope Collegiate students and staff in documentary for a Progressive Labor Party-affiliated group “without authorization” from the students or staff members.
The policies of New York City’s school district “prohibit the use of school facilities, equipment and supplies on behalf of political organizations,” according to the education department’s court filing.
It’s ok though, she’s one of God’s chosen people. The “system” will probably take that into consideration.
Bloomberg’s lawsuit concerning the investigation — filed Friday — contends that the investigation into her alleged communist activities is retaliation because she opposes racism and has criticized the New York City Board of Education for, she says, practices that amount to segregation.
No, it’s probably because you’re trying to brainwash impressionable children into supporting a totalitarian and failed ideology that has resulted in millions of deaths.
Earlier this year, Bloomberg charged the education department with discrimination because, she said, a school with many white students received more sports equipment than Park Slope Collegiate did. The students at Park Slope Collegiate are primarily black and Latino.
I’m guessing the white students probably have parents who pay more in taxes, so their kids should benefit more.
Supporters of Bloomberg packed a Lower Manhattan courtroom for a hearing related to Bloomberg’s lawsuit. Many of them all wore the same t-shirts.
Like the brainwashed cult that they are…
After the hearing, Bloomberg and her supporters spoke.
Probably speech that she personally disapproves of.
“The speech I am most known for is anti-racism,” the principal also said.
Bloomberg’s supporters recited her message in remarkably similar fashion.
A Park Slope Collegiate eighth grader named Maya showed up at the court proceedings to declare that Bloomberg only wants to fight against racism.
And to fight to implement Communism.
“It’s just upsetting that she’s being accused of stating her own political views when she’s just stating the facts that racism is here,” Maya informed Chalkbeat.
Funny how she’s allowed to state her political views, but the students who disagree with her aren’t.
A special education teacher, Sarah Vega, swore that Bloomberg never tries to indoctrinate students with revolutionary communist propaganda.
“I’ve worked for her for over a decade,” Vega told Chalkbeat. “I’ve never seen her furthering any political agenda whatsoever. She fights against racism, but I don’t really consider that partisan politics.”
Bloomberg has indicated that she does not belong to the Progressive Labor Party.
Somehow, I don’t believe any of this
This week, a federal judge is expected to decide whether to allow the investigation by school officials to proceed.
My guess, the judge will probably have a last name ending with either “berg”, “stein”, “witz” or “cohen”, and will throw it out. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong though.