Exciting times in Dublin: Somali jailed for stabbing.

If you’re an Irish person, below a certain age, you might not remember just how boring a city Dublin used to be. I’m fairly young myself, but I am just about old enough to remember those dark and dreary times. The place used to be so safe and uninteresting. It was terrible. Thank God we now get to experience exciting happenings, such as today’s story, in Dublin. It really has enriched our lives.

From Irish Examiner

A Somalian father-of-three who stabbed another man in the neck during a prearranged fight has been jailed for 18 months.

The average Somali has an IQ of 68. So you can clearly understand why people like this guy have been brought to Ireland.

look-at-me-im-the-engineer-now

That’s right, we need their incredible skills and intelligence, in order to improve our economy,  and raise our living standards to similar levels  seen in Somalia.

getty_2603040k
Ireland
destiny-future-newcastle-660_0.png
Somalia

Judge Melanie Greally said it was “a matter of chance alone” that the wound inflicted by Mohammed Adan Ali (26) was not more serious.

“Mohammed”

What a surprise.

The court heard the knife did not strike any major blood vessels and the injured party, a Somalian acquaintance, was treated with stitches.

Well the good news is that in this situation at least, it wasn’t an Irish person that was harmed.  I really don’t give a damn what they do to each other. I just would prefer if they were doing it back in Somalia.

1

Em, no, what I meant, is that I’m glad they’re doing it here, because it makes our boring city so much more exciting to live in. It’s so exciting and wonderful, having violent, 68 IQ, dullards, stabbing each other in the street. They culturally enrich us. They strengthen us with their diversity. *additional generic virtue signalling comment, here*.

Ali, with an address at Balfe Road, Walkinstown, Dublin pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to assault causing harm at Mountjoy Square, Dublin, on June 22, 2017. He has no previous convictions.

He probably hasn’t been here long enough to rack up any convictions yet. If a guy was here only one month, and another guy was here 30 years, and both committed a “first offence”, does saying that that neither of them have any previous convictions, really mean the same thing for both of them.

618_gaul
“I know your crime was horrific, but seeing as this is your first offence, in the whole 3 days you’ve been in the country, I’m willing to go easy on you.”

At the sentence hearing, Garda Stephen Rooney told Antonia Boyle BL, prosecuting, that Ali rang the injured party asking for money to send to his daughter.

Gda Rooney said Ali used “choice words” in this call and during subsequent phone contact arranged to meet the injured party for a fight.

The court heard a third Somalian national broke up the initial confrontation, but Ali then pulled a knife from his jeans and came towards the injured party.

See? They’re not all bad. The third one broke up the fight. He’s a true hero. He’s the proof we need that Ireland needs infinity Somalis, in order to progress.

The victim later told gardaí that he didn’t run because he didn’t think Ali would use the knife.

Is it even possible to “think” with a 68 IQ?

Gda Rooney told Ms Boyle that the knife broke when Ali stabbed the injured man in the neck.

Gda Rooney agreed with Karl Monaghan BL, defending, that his client had had a difficult life and had witnessed his father’s murder while a child.

“We need to import people who suffered severe traumatic experiences, that may make them emotionally unstable and violent. It will be good for the economy.”

The garda agreed that Ali was estranged from his mother because of his continued alcohol abuse. He accepted Ali was apologetic and had a “grievance” on his mind at the time.

Judge Greally acknowledged that Ali had a history of alcohol abuse, but had addressed his issues and was deemed at low risk of re-offending.

Well if he apologised, we should probably just let him go. I’m sure he’s perfectly safe now.

She took into account the “difficult, chaotic and often violent circumstances of (his) youth in Somalia”, but said stabbing a person in the neck necessitated a custodial sentence.

If only we could figure out what causes all the violence in Somalia. Also, what causes Somalis to be violent when they aren’t in Somalia. We know for a fact that it couldn’t be the Somali people themselves, because that’s politically incorrect, which means that it couldn’t possibly be true.

I guess we’ll never figure it out.

Faysal Ahmed, Barkhad Abdi, Barkhad Abdirahman, Mahat Ali,
A real mystery on our hands.
Advertisements

“We love freedom of speech. Also, let’s suppress freedom of speech.

0da08d3d12107a3bb0a43428f1f9e516

Two days ago, Ireland had a referendum to remove the criminal offence of blasphemy from our constitution. It was an ineffective amendment, under which nobody had actually been charged in over 150 years, but there was a principle involved, and that principle is freedom of speech. Regardless of how ineffective it was, the fact is, Ireland still technically had a a constitutional amendment in place that in theory, put limits on our freedom of speech. So naturally, anyone who seriously values freedom of speech (which I do), was in favour of repealing it.  Although turnout was rather poor, of those who did come out, a huge majority voted in favour of its repeal, suggesting that the majority support freedom of speech.

Or so you would think.

From Irish Council of Civil Liberties

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) has welcomed the Yes vote in the referendum on blasphemy as an important step for free speech and the modernisation of our democracy.

I agree. There’s no place in any modern day, free society, for laws that place restriction on a person’s freedom of speech. I too, welcome this result.

ICCL campaigned for a Yes vote in this referendum and we have consistently advocated this change over many years. This positive result brings Ireland into line with international best practice in human rights, as called for by the UN Human Rights Committee.

Echoing the recommendations of the Constitutional Convention, we are now calling on the government to repeal sections 36 and 37 of the Defamation Act 2009 which define the criminal offence of blasphemy.

They’re coming across very reasonable so far, aren’t they? Watch how that changes in the next paragraph.

We are also calling on the Government to take immediate action to coordinate state bodies’ responses to hate- and hostility-based crime and to bring forward legislation to protect from hate- and hostility-based crime.

And there it is. They talk a big game about how they value freedom of speech, but really what they mean is, they value freedom of speech that they personally agree with. Within 24 hours of the result of a referendum, ostensibly in favour of improving Ireland’s freedom of speech, they’re calling for legislation that will make free speech even more restrictive, all while claiming to celebrate free speech. It’s a literal real world example of Orwellian doublethink.

61vfdCYe7iL._SY550_
“Restrictions on free speech, is free speech.”

Executive Director of the ICCL, Liam Herrick, said:

“During our campaign for a Yes vote, our guiding principle was respect for freedom of expression.

You mean freedom of expression that  you and your organisation personally agree with.

However, we have also argued that the right to free speech is not absolute

No you fucking prick, the whole point of free speech is that it is absolute. Once you put restrictions on it, it’s no longer “free”. Therefore it’s not “free speech”. This is not a difficult concept to understand.

and should be limited to the degree necessary to protect people from hate- and hostility-motivated crime.

All crimes by definition, involve hostility.  And the victim suffers the same, no matter what. It shouldn’t matter whether the victim is LGBT or straight. Black or white. Male or female. Native Irish or immigrant. Christian or Muslim, etc., etc. If they’re an innocent person, who has been victimised by a criminal act, they all deserve the same justice, for the same type of crime. Creating a victimhood hierarchy, were certain demographics, receive harsher sentences than others, or certain victims get more justice than others, is objectively a ridiculous and divisive way to do things. But of course, we already have the precedent from other countries, to know what this is really all about. it’s not about protecting minorities. It’s about punishing dissidents who speak out against the genocide that is being inflicted upon us.

scot1
We’re going to end up like the UK, were people are arrested for social media posts that express wrongthink about all the terror attacks and Muslim child rape gangs that have been inflicted upon them. It’s “hatespeech” to speak the truth about things like this in the UK. Do you really think it will be any different in Ireland?

Hate crime is something which is entirely different to blasphemy as it is directed towards individuals or groups, rather than ideas or institutions. There is no legislation in place to deal with hate crime in Ireland at the moment.”

And there shouldn’t ever be. There should be equally severe sentences, regardless of the demographics involved in crime. A black guy who beats up a white guy, should get the same sentence as a white guy who beats up a black guy. A Muslim who murders a Christian, should get the same sentence as a a Christian who murders a Muslim. And a person who expresses their personal opinion on Islam, and the people who follow it, should get absolutely no sentence at all, same as those who express their opinion on Christianity and its followers.

Ireland is obliged by European and international human rights law to have in place a robust framework to respond to and prevent hate- and hostility-based crime.

Yet another reason to leave the EU.

In April ICCL released a report which showed that Ireland is seriously deficient in addressing hate crime when compared to other EU member States.

No doubt, we’ll be falling over ourselves to play catch up, as quickly as possible. I can honestly see Ireland going “full Sweden”, the way things are going.

The Lifecycle of a Hate Crime: Country Report for Ireland shows that from the point at which a victim reports a crime to An Garda Síochána to the point at which a judge sentences an offender, the hate element of a crime is filtered out of the criminal justice process.

And I’ve still yet to see an explanation as to why it should be.

Though it won’t matter. You can be sure that the majority of our treacherous politicians, would be more than happy to oblige, and bring in laws that restrict our ability to speak out against what they’re doing to us.

cheshire1.jpg

Tough times ahead.

20 “British” men jailed for sexually abusing girls.

9-F3-A3-BE9-C779-4706-BD06-422-F2-DDEBB05.jpg

Just business as usual in Britain. But it has been a while since I’ve made a new post, so why not discuss it?

From The Journal

BRITISH PROSECUTORS REVEALED today that 20 men had been jailed for raping and sexually abusing more than a dozen girls aged as young as 11 in one town between 2004 and 2011.

Nice to see them arrest and convict the actual rapists for a change. Normally, the typical policy followed by the police of the United Caliphate, is to arrest the fathers of the girls, when they try to save them.

GirlRapeUK

England’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the convictions came in a series of trials held since January that could not be reported at the time due to a blanket ban imposed by the court.

Yes of course there was a ban imposed. Wouldn’t want the sleeping native Brits to wake up from their coma of reality TV and Premier League football, and see what’s actually going on around them. The multicultural experiment is a disaster. Their children are having their lives destroyed, and it’s deliberately being inflicted upon them from above.

These horrific crimes are sickening and, first and foremost, I commend the bravery of those who’ve suffered abuse in coming forward, said Home Secretary Sajid Javid, the interior minister.

“Sajid Javid”

I can guarantee you that he was specifically selected by his party to be the one to make that statement, purely for the propaganda value of “See, not all people of Pakistani descent, agree with what those other Pakistani men did. This guy is one of the good majority. The bad ones are a tiny minority.”

Don’t fall into the trap. Every move is calculated to manipulate us.

The gang operated in Huddersfield – a town of 160,000 in northern England.

Well they had to operate somewhere. Rochdale was already taken.

And Rotherham.

And Aylesbury.

And Banbury.

And Halifax.

And Newcastle.

And Bristol.

And… actually, you know what? At this point, it’s probably quicker to name British towns and cities that HAVEN’T had a Muslim rape gang scandal.

The group’s ringleader – identified as 35-year-old Amere Singh Dhaliwal – was jailed for life and told he must serve a minimum of 18 years in prison.

“Amere Singh Dhaliwal”

Typical British name. Could easily have been a guy named Nigel Smith.

o-BRITISH-570.jpg
Amere Singh Dhaliwal, pictured outside of court.

“The men who have been convicted of these appalling crimes deliberately targeted their victims because of their vulnerability,” said CPS spokesman Michael Quinn.

They deliberately targeted them because of their ethnicity. In the overwhelming majority of cases, the victims were white.

But yeah, keep drinking that “white privilege / only whites can be racist / diversity is our strength / Muslims are the real victims” kool-aid.

qkvbzovs5jr11

They groomed them and exploited them for their own sexual gratification. Sometimes, they used threats and violence. Typically, they plied them with alcohol and drugs.

And lets not forget that the British government were the ones who inflicted them on these girls in the first place, the British police refused to do anything about it, until they had no choice, and the British media deliberately covered up. They’re all every bit to blame as the perpetrators themselves.

The men are all British of South Asian origin, mostly of Pakistani heritage. British media reports said many perpetrators have never been identified.

They aren’t supposed to be identified. That’s the point. If the media had their way, none of them would be identified.

“The way you treated these girls defies understanding. This abuse was vile and wicked,” judge Geoffrey Marson was revealed to have told one group of 16 men he jailed earlier this year.

More pointless rhetoric. What are they going to do to prevent this sort of thing from happening again? I’ll answer for you.

NOTHING!!!

As cases of sexual abuse with which the courts have to deal, this case comes top of the scale.

Is it really any worse than all the others that have been uncovered, and all the others that i can guarantee you are still happening right now, and have yet to be exposed?

The ringleader was convicted of 54 separate counts that included 22 rapes of 11 different girls.

“You treated them as commodities to be passed around for your own sexual gratification and the gratification of others,” the judge told him.

Yeah, no shit.

Children’s lives have been ruined and families profoundly affected by seeing their children, over months and years, out of control, having been groomed by you and other members of your gang.
And those cases are just the  tip of the iceberg.

Car plows into crowd in Sweden.

You may have noticed that I haven’t posted about any terrorist attacks in quite some time, something I used to do on very regular basis. This isn’t because they haven’t still been happening. It’s because it was quite frankly happening so often, that it was actually getting boring to post about it every time. There once was a time (like three years ago), when any one of these attacks would have been the top international news story for a week or so. It was unusual and shocking to see these attacks take place. But that was then, and in just a few short years, it has happened so often, that it has gone from being something shocking and traumatic, to being the new normal. Nobody is phased anymore. People just take it for granted, that this sort of thing is going to happen every once in a while. We’ve been desensitised.

Nevertheless, just because I’m no longer writing about every single attack that happens, that doesn’t mean I’m going to stop writing about them entirely. Sometimes, I come across a story that I actually feel is still worth taking a look at. And with that in mind, lets do exactly that.

From Express

A CAR ploughed into a crowd of children and their parents on a walk near Karlshamn, in Sweden, police revealed today. 

Those damn self driving cars and their propensity to run over people. Must be a Tesla model.

skynews-elon-musk-weed_4414031
Wanted: For creating self-driving cars, while high as a kite.

Two pupils were hurt with a police manhunt now underway.

A manhunt? So that means there was a driver then? Guess it wasn’t a Tesla after all.

07-elon-musk-smoking-weed.w700.h700.jpg
Apologies Mr. Musk. I’ll never judge you again. Well, at least not until your next rocket explodes.

A spokesman for ‘s police service said children “threw themselves” out of the way of the car, which appeared to have aimed directly for the group of 100 people.

He said: “The car accelerated into the group of students and teachers.

“The car increased speed and drove straight towards them.

So it was no accident then? I wonder what the actual motivation could be?

Islam-car-attack-toon
I’m going to predict “Mental Illness” myself.

“He drove into two of the students. One was injured on the wrist and possibly the other student was also injured.”

Thankfully, very little damage was done. Not only is the guy who did this, a massive piece of shit, but he’s also a massive failure as well. Plows into a crowd of 100, and doesn’t even manage to kill one.

Police have today appealed for any information on the horrifying incident, which took place at 1pm local time (12pm BST) yesterday.

Rest easy everyone. The Swedish police are on the case.

I bet people feel safer already.

The group was made up of 100 children and 10 teachers from Mjallby secondary school.

They were walking from Hinnedalsvagen to Grundsjon as part of a social event. 

The car was described as a black or dark blue Saab. It was driving at around 25mph when it hit the crowd. 

The driver fled the scene, police said.

Notice how there’s no description of the attacker? Just in case you need a reminder why this is…

But yeah, I think we can safely guess the background of the attacker, just from pattern recognition.

Witnesses were unable to identify whether the driver was male of female. 

Actually, you know what?Maybe it was a native Swede after all.

“We’re unable to identify whether they’re male or female”.

Police are appealing for any information. 

And no doubt, if someone calls up and gives the police an accurate description of what the attacker looks like, the caller will probably be arrested instead, for “hate speech”.

You had your chance Sweden, just a few short weeks ago, to try and vote your way out of this mess. Instead, you chose to vote for more of the same. So enjoy the results of the vote, Swedes. Something tells me, that the next four years are going to be very long and very difficult for you.

The “most Swedish” story I ever read.

Why does this keep happening? I keep thinking to myself that I’ve heard the very worst from Sweden, and that they’ll never manage to sink any lower in my eyes. Yet somehow, they always manage to find new ways to amaze me with the depths they have managed to sink. Scraping the bottom of the barrel? Oh please, Sweden managed to scrape away the very surface of the barrel itself, and then managed to scrape away the Earth underneath were the barrel was standing, and come out the other side in Australia. This has got to be it. There couldn’t possibly be another story that sums up the dire situation in Sweden, better than this one.

SpP6SFz.jpg

At least, I’m saying that now. If history has taught me anything, it is to never expect Sweden to finally stop shocking me. I’m sure they’ll eventually have an even worse story than this one.

From Politicoat

Gothenburg, Sweden – The first ever man-free music festival kicked off in Gothenburg last week as a result of migrant sexual assaults at music events in years past. 

I’m pretty sure I covered that story myself actually. Or possibly a story very similar to it. I have no way of being sure, I mean there are so many stories about Sweden,and I’ve covered so many myself, I honestly can’t keep track anymore.

DJI9EpjXgAA9TDB

As the 2018 Bravalla music festival was canceled due to rapes by Arabic and African welfare migrants in previous years,

SSSHHH!!!

You aren’t supposed to name their ethnicity.

the 2018 man-free Gothenburg music festival was heralded as the “most progressive in history” because attendees, performers, journalists, and even police providing security for the event had to be female.

Yes and we all know how well the Female police have done in Sweden.

“Sir, sir. Please cooperate. Sir. Don’t test me sir. I learned how to defend myself in Finland.

“We expected thousands of women to attend as a certain testosterone, I mean certain tension had been lifted,” said event spokesperson Rebecka Ljung touting the concert a “safe zone for all women”.

A safe zone you say? Were certain people are kept out? You mean… like a border perhaps?

Although the two-day music festival banned men, transgenders were welcome as festival organizers gleefully accepted any male depressed and crazy enough to pump himself full of psychotropic and hormone-altering drugs trying to convince himself he is a woman.

I bet you can already predict the plot twist already.

News of the all-female (and transgender male) music festival spread fast as Swedish media eager to tout hatred for western civilization provided non-stop coverage leading up to the event.

Here it comes…

Knowledge about the festival, in fact, became so widespread hoards of foreign welfare migrants looting and burning cars in the streets of Gothenburg took time away from destroying Sweden to attend the event in hopes of making involuntary sexual contact with female concertgoers.

And how did that plan turn out, you might ask?

Well…

Initially, the all-male migrant gangs were turned away from the man-free music festival

Wow that’s a shocker.

but quickly gained access after contending they were ‘awakened Muslim transgender non-men’.

But that sure isn’t.

As gangs of these ‘Muslim transgender non-men’ made their way through crowds of female concertgoers, ‘non-problems’ began to occur as scores of women were maybe kind of certain something had happened to them.

“At first a lot of women were angry about all these men coming into our women-only event and sexually assaulting everyone, but then the men told us they were Muslim transgenders,” said a 27-year-old festival attendee who endured the diversity she received at the hands of her attackers in order not to offend Muslims or transgenders.

As the immigrant transgenders continued to diversify concert goers, Swedish female police officers in attendance were powerless to stop the consensual assaults in fear of being reprimanded by their superiors for intolerance and discrimination against migrants.

“Many women attending the music festival, including our own officers, were not familiar with the term Muslim transgenders.  In the interest of Swedish acceptance and compassion for all ideas, opinions, people, plants, and animals our officers decided to supervise these diversifications instead of adopting a stance of intolerance and bigotry,” said Sweden’s National Police Commissioner Dan Eliasson in regards to hoards of Arabic and African illiterates having their way with scores of female Swedes.

A bunch of women were getting sexually assaulted by Muslim men who pretended to be transgender. The women themselves put up with it, and the police refused to do anything to stop it, because both groups were afraid of being thought of as transphobic or racist.

this-is-sweden-sweden-let-in-a-ton-of-migrants-1666237Can you see what I mean when I said that this is probably the “most Swedish” story that I’ve ever read?

To date, none of the so-called transgender migrants who diversified female festival-goers have been arrested or even questioned about their actions during the concert.

And I doubt any of them ever will be either.

But if you think the story couldn’t possibly get anymore absurd, then read on for the conclusion, which really pushes it over the edge.

Several Swedish male nationals were, however, taken into custody for disturbing the peace. During the music festival news of the migrant transgender diversification of female concertgoers spread over Facebook and other social media streaming services.

As Enraged fathers, brothers, husbands, and boyfriends of female attendees entered the concert venue to stop transgender migrants from diversifying their daughters, wives, sisters, and girlfriends several were arrested by police on charges of assault, racial and preferential identity discrimination which can levy a term of twenty years in prison under Swedish law.

So lets just summarise this story once again.

  • Sweden throws open their borders to the very worst countries in the world, and sees their rates of rape and sexual assault skyrocket as a result.
  • Sweden stops recording crimes based on ethnicity, and pretends it’s just a problem with men in general. Coincidentally, all Swedish men became rapists at around the same time as Sweden starts seeing a massive increase in migration from Africa and the Middle East.
  • They set up women’s only music festivals, so women won’t experience sexual assault.
  • Muslim men hear about the festival and get in by claiming to be transgender.
  • Muslim men start sexually assaulting the women in the women’s only festival.
  • The Women themselves do nothing, for fear of appearing intolerant to migrants / transgender people.
  • The police do nothing, for fear of appearing intolerant to migrants / transgender people.
  • The men who engaged in sexual assault are not arrested.
  • Fathers, husbands, brothers, and boyfriends of the sexually assaulted women try to defend them. They do get arrested.

I can’t even be angry when I read stories like this anymore. It’s just too insane for my mind to even make sense of.All I can do is just sit here and try my best to make sense of it all.

UK: “Universities need to hand out more degrees to black students, just because…”

F0Km61h.png

“Diversity is our greatest strength. We don’t need to explain why this is. We just know it to be true. Just like how we know that the sun revolves around the earth, and only racists heretics would ever question the obvious wisdom of that”.

Well it seems that diversity is being threatened in the UK. For reasons that are completely unexplainable (but most likely caused by racism), black students are failing to graduate from university at the same rate as their white counterparts. Because diversity and equality of outcome are more important than holding everyone to the same high standards as each other, something needs to be done about this ASAP.

From The Telegraph

Universities could be punished unless they give a higher proportion of top degrees to black students, under new proposals drawn up by the regulator.

Notice how there’s no mention of a requirement for the black students having to actually achieve the grades necessary to earn a top degree? They just have to be given it anyway.

174wq9.jpg
Yep. Aren’t you so oppressed?

The Office for Students (OfS) has announced plans to overhaul its guidelines for boosting diversity in higher education, in what it says is the “biggest shake up” since 2004.

Are they ever going to explain why  boosting “diversity” is such an important thing to do? What are the actual benefits of this increased diversity? Why is it so essential? Why do we need it so badly, that we need to do away with “fairness”, and “merit” in order to achieve it? In what ways will the benefits of this increased diversity, outweigh the benefits of maintaining the current high standards?

1484264206575

They will never answer these questions, because quite frankly, there is no logical answer to them. This is purely based on ideology, rather than common sense.

If institutions fail to comply with the regulator’s new “tougher” national targets for increasing the number of disadvantaged students, they could be penalised through a fine or even de-registered.

So they say it’s about helping “disadvantaged” students, but at the same time, are specifically focusing on race, rather than economic background. As far as they’re concerned, a black student from a rich family is disadvantaged, when compared to a white student from a poor family. Of course, anyone with any knowledge of what is going on, knows this is not really about helping students from disadvantaged backgrounds. It’s simply about hurting the prospects of white people.

Chris Millward, the OfS director for fair access and participation, said that universities will no longer be able to “mark their own homework” on their plans to up their intake of 18-year-olds from poor backgrounds.  

Instead, the new regulator, which came into force earlier this year, plans to set a series of national targets that all universities will be expected to meet.   

These will not be limited to targets for admitting more school leavers from deprived households, but will also include addressing the gap in degree attainment between black and white students, according to OfS proposals.

They never consider the idea of investigating WHY this gap in degree attainment exists in the first place. Understanding the root causes of the gap and trying to go from there to solve it, is not part of the agenda. Instead, they just want to manipulate the results and achieve equality of outcome without an equality of merit.

NmWXEKF.png

There has been an almost 50 per cent increase in the number of black and ethnic minority students in England between 2007 and 2016.

“Mass, replacement level immigration is just a Neo-Nazi, white supremacist, conspiracy theory.”

78 per cent of white students graduated last year with a first class of upper second class degree, compared to just 53 per cent of black students.

“Racism must be the cause for this. There couldn’t possibly be another explanation.”

Qualifications before attending university, although a key factor in degree outcomes, do not explain the differences between ethnic groups, according to data analysed by Universities UK.

No, but I’ve got a theory on what could explain the difference instead.

bell curve.jpg

In a consultation document, published today, the regulator sets out a number of areas that universities should work on, such as combatting the higher drop-out rate among poorer students compared to their middle-class peers.  

Mr Millward said: “Universities have always set their own targets, and have used different measures of success. They were kind of marking their own homework.

“We are going to set clearer national targets which they will refer to: not just looking at access but do students finish their courses? What is their degree outcome depending on background?”

I can guarantee you that this will all fail miserably. Governments are too incompetent to make anything work right.

Mr Millward said that universities have spent hundreds of millions of pounds on measures aimed at diversifying their intake of students, but have paid little or no attention to whether their schemes were effective. 

Hundreds of millions of pounds down the toilet in order to pursue this obsession with diversity, and we’ve still yet to hear an explanation about why this diversity is even desirable. Be perfectly honest with yourself. Even ignoring  the financial cost, and just focusing on everything else that has happened, has any country at all benefited from increased diversity? Has Sweden benefited? Has Germany? Has Italy? Has France? Has the UK? Has *insert any country here*? Seriously, what are the actual benefits of this diversity? Will anyone ever actually answer the question?

“I don’t doubt that universities are committed to improving access. They are spending a lot of money and doing a lot but they don’t understand enough about whether it’s working,” he told The Daily Telegraph.

It’s never going to work. Just like the way the first world has thrown trillions of dollars at Africa in foreign  aid and development over the past 50 years, and if anything, a lot of the countries there are going backwards rather than forwards.  You can keep throwing money at the problem all you want, but it’s never going to make a difference, because a lack of funding is not the cause.

“We are upping the expectation on evaluation. Once we know that, we can target [budgets] where it can make a difference.”

Failure

Last year, universities spent a total of around £800 million on projects to increase access and around half of this was spent on bursaries for students from poor households.

“I’m not arguing against bursaries being provided, particularly because students can be really challenged by the cost when they are at university,” Mr Millward said.

And yet despite spending that much money, they’re no closer to solving the “”problem”.

“But there is very little evidence that bursaries improve access. That is a really obvious areas where we need to evaluate. [We need to] ask why it is spent and what impact it is having?”

HOLY SHIT!!!

He actually said something that I agree with.

Dr Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, said he welcomes the emphasis on evaluation

“There is a great deal of activity to improve access taking place across the sector but what we need now is a clear overview of which interventions make the biggest difference,” he said. “We need to be clearer on what works, and what doesn’t, if we are to shift the dial.”

Unfortunately, they’re not going to use the scientific method when trying to figure this situation out. They will automatically refuse to consider certain possibilities, limit the scope of what they will actually investigate, fail to find a possible solution, and either just go back to throwing money at the problem (and getting nowhere in the process), or just creating a two tier system, were black students are held to lower standards than white students, and see their graduation rate increase that way instead.

And this is what they call “”Equality”.

Trump mentions the South African situation. Guy called “Bernstein” freaks out about it.

So the South African situation, which I have given frequent attention to over the past few years, has really started heating up recently. It has gotten so bad in fact, that it has even come to the attention of Donald Trump.

Anyone who has paid any attention to what has been going on in South Africa, will be aware that all Trump has done here, is simply tell a truth that the Western media has deliberately ignored and covered up. Nothing he has said here is offensive. Nothing he said here is racist. And nothing he has said here is untrue.

So of course, he has managed to cause massive offence by saying it. And this “Bernstein” fellow really sums it up quite well.

What can you really say about this? It’s a completely hysterical reaction. The US regularly goes to war with countries ostensibly to “protect human rights”, for far less justification, than what is happening to white people in South Africa , and nobody bats an eye. Trump simply draws attention to what is happening to them, and people like this Bernstein fellow have a meltdown over it. The idea of white people ever being thought of as victims of racial persecution, is a concept they refuse to accept. And when you look at Bernstein’s tweets, it’s obvious why. They are terrified of white people in other parts of the world seeing what’s happening, and realising that the same will happen to them eventually, and waking up to the threat. They want to keep us asleep, until it’s too late to reverse what is happening.

But why is this Bernstein fellow so upset at the idea of white people waking up to the genocide that we’re facing? What is his interest in all this?

14910577_207870326304595_7083341025353427794_nJew-Genocide-Ishmael-Levittsthe-goal-of-abolishing-the-white-race-is-on-its-26633253tumblr_mh5y19e1XE1rwuqpbo1_500unnamed

Untitled

Yeah, I just can’t figure out why this “Bernstein” fellow would have a problem with Trump drawing attention to the plight of South African whites.

What do you think could be the reason, dear reader?

123

Try to figure it out.

Pakistani gang preying on drunk Irish women in nightclubs

Just a quick one here. There’s really not much commentary that I can add to this one. The message that should be taken from it is already quite clear.

From Extra.ie

Gardai are on high alert for a gang targeting and isolating drunk women across the southeast.

A 28-year-old man of Pakistani origin — who was acquitted of rape in recent years — is the main suspect but gardaí believe he has friends who are also involved. The man is known to drive a grey Kilkenny-registered Audi.

There have been reports about the gang in Dungarvan, Co Waterford, in recent weeks. It has also been active in Carlow and Waterford.

A source said that the gang is a ‘real concern’. ‘This man was acquitted of rape in recent years but is considered a real concern. He and his friends go to clubs and pubs where they target drunk young women, try to isolate them and take them away.

‘Pub staff and bouncers copped them in Dungarvan and managed to stop them. This is deliberate targeting and isolating drunk women and claiming consent.’

Yes, yes, I’ve heard it a million times already, that this sort of thing happens everywhere, has happened in Ireland long before the borders were opened, and that members of every demographic commit these kinds of crimes.

I understand that, but that’s not an excuse for any of this at all. Unfortunately, no matter where you go, there’s always going to be bad people who do bad things. It’s impossible to eliminate these problems entirely. We just have to try to be vigilant, protect ourselves and the people we love, and bring the criminals to justice when they engage in their crimes.

8p4uA.jpg
Justice

But just because we have these problems already, doesn’t make it acceptable to add to the problem and make it worse. Our own home grown scumbags are our burden to deal with, and when they commit their crimes, it is our responsibility to punish them. Like it or not, we have an obligation to them, because they are our own. But we have no obligation to the scumbags of the rest of the world.There’s no reason for them to be our burden as well.

It’s just a simple mathematical reality that more rapists in a country means more rapes in that country. Less rapists means less rapes. We can’t eliminate 100% of rapes because no matter what, we’ll always have our own home grown rapists. But we can however lessen the number of rapes in our country by not importing the dregs of the world, and letting them roam our streets freely. We can’t protect every woman from sexual predators, but we can lessen the number who fall victim to it by just having common sense and not flooding our country with people from parts of the world, with a poor record in terms of how they treat their own women.

But I know I’m wasting my time  here. We’re still going to pretend that there is no difference in the crime rates of different ethnic groups, no difference in the attitudes towards women, of different ethnic groups, and no way to solve the problems we’re seeing. Ireland is just going to end up like the UK, Germany, and Sweden eventually, at this rate.

The only thing I can say at this point, is try not to let yourself become a statistic ladies. Take care of yourself when you’re out. Watch what you drink, stick with people you trust, and always be alert. I’m just sorry that this country has learned nothing from the mistakes of other countries.

Shit is about to hit the fan in South Africa.

MeltingPot02
It’s the future we’re all facing if we don’t wake up.

I’ve quite often mentioned the situation in South Africa because I’m of the belief that South Africa is actually just a preview of things to come in every single (currently) white majority country, in the future. They’re just a few decades further down the path then the rest of us, but the difference is, whereas it’s too late to prevent the inevitable there, there is still time for the rest of us, if we can learn from their mistakes. We can still get off this path in time, if we just wake up and come to our senses, before it’s too late. In the mean time, all we can do is look on from afar at the present situation in South Africa, and try to remind ourselves that we don’t want the same to happen to us.

From The Express

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa recently announced plans to allow white people’s land to be taken without compensation, which will then be distributed to black people in a move that he believes will be good for the economy.

It has been on the cards for quite some time, but now it’s official. They’re actually going to go through with the land confiscation. And everything I’ve heard on this topic, suggests that the whites will not give it up peacefully. The only question that really remains now, is whether the blacks will exterminate the whites, or will the whites successfully defend themselves in a civil war against them? Either way, bloodshed is inevitable now, and all we can do is wait and see what happens.

The president made the announcement late on Tuesday in a televised address to the nation.

I know it’s an overdone cliche at this point, but I’m going to do it anyway. Imagine if a white leader (for example, Trump), went on TV and announced that he was going to confiscate property from the black minority in America, without compensation, and hand it over to white people? Can you imagine the reaction, both within America itself, and globally?

As Donald Trump Wins Presidency, Country Reacts161111215440-miami-trump-protest-1111---restricted-super-169cbdedd13-69aa-4d6b-8173-44e0de93ce2clos-angeles-trump-election-riotsmaxresdefault

Yeah of course it would not be tolerated at all. But seeing as it’s a black leader doing it to white people, nobody cares, because they’re brainwashed fools who believe in the idiotic myth of white privilege.

The farmers have claimed that the government’s plan will be “catastrophic and could lead to anarchy and food shortages like Venezuela or Zimbabwe”.

Which is exactly what I’m predicting too, by the way.

The economy of Zimbabwe collapsed after their own land reform was carried out.

“Just an unfortunate coincidence.”

More than 20 years after the end of apartheid in South Africa, white farmers still own the majority of South Africa’s land.

And why shouldn’t they? I already explained it in some detail in this previous post, but the vast majority of the land that makes up South Africa, was uninhabited, before it was colonised by Europeans. Most of the present day black South Africans are themselves descended from immigrants, who settled in South Africa AFTER it was already settled and built up by white people. They willingly chose to come to South Africa in order to share in the prosperity that the white people created, prosperity they could never create themselves. And now, instead of showing their gratitude, they’re driving out, stealing from, and exterminating their benefactors, and are rapidly pushing the country towards the same failed state as every other Sub-Saharan African country. They’re going to destroy themselves in the process, but they’re far too stupid to see that, just like the Zimbabweans were before them.

It is inevitable at this rate. All we can do is look on helplessly, as it all takes place before us in real time.

An organisation representing South Africans, AfriForum, said that land expropriation with no compensation would have “catastrophic results like in Venezuela and Zimbabwe”.

The organisation’s chief executive Kallie Kriel said: “History teaches us that international investors, regardless of what AfriForum or anyone else says, are unwilling to invest in a country where property rights are not protected.”

Yeah, but who cares about history? That’s all in the past. Sure, Communism has resulted in countless millions murdered every time it has been tried. Sure, followers of Islam have always tried to conquer and force their beliefs on every culture they have come into contact with. Sure, multiculturalism has resulted in conflict everywhere it has ever occurred. Sure what is being attempted in South Africa now, has already failed in Zimbabwe when it was tried there. We should try to make all these things work anyway, because… because… well you know what, I don’t even need to give a reason.

Ian Cameron, of AfriForum, said: “We’re really heading for a state of anarchy if something doesn’t change drastically.

Anarchy is probably the best case scenario. I think what we’re actually going to see will be more like Rwanda in 1994, but with the white South Africans in the place of the Tutsis. The rhetoric being directed towards them, is already eerily similar.

“There are places where the police simply refuse to act. They don’t know the law well enough or refuse to apply it to logical reasoning when it comes to defending people’s property rights.”

Or more likely, they just don’t care to enforce the law.

In the 1990s black South Africans received grants and subsidies to buy land plots, which resulted in overcrowding and poor land use.

Because they were too incompetent to use it properly. That might not be such a big deal with small plots of subsistence land, but with massive commercial farms that the economy depends on, and that feed the population, it will be a massive disaster.

South Africa’s history of colonial conquest has pushed most of the black people into crowded urban areas or rural reserves.

They weren’t pushed onto anything. They willingly chose to immigrate to South Africa from other parts of the continent, because of the prosperity that the white South Africans had created, reproduced at a far higher rate than the whites did, until their population exploded, and ended up in their present situation. They have nobody to blame, but themselves.

The 1913 Native Lands Act made it illegal for Africans to acquire land beyond these reserves, which became known as “Homelands”.

They should just be thankful that they were allowed live in the country at all, seeing as they never could have created one with similar living standards themselves. It was actually for their own good in a way that they weren’t allowed to own land. If they had, they would have fucked the country up much sooner than they are now.

About one-tenth of land in white ownership has been transferred to black ownership since the end if apartheid, which is only a third of the government’s target.

Some investors think that Ramaphosa may be simply trying to win political points with the land reform ahead of an election next year.

Democracy in action folks.

Bennie Van Zyl, the general manager of the Agricultural Union of South Africa (TAU SA), said: “For us, this is a pity that they’ve made their choice, because no one will invest in this economy and we actually need growth to address the realities of South Africa. So we have great concern for this approach.

“A lot of foreign countries that have already contacted us as an organisation say if that is the case, we are not willing to invest in your country anymore.

“And if the ANC goes through with this, it will be devastating for this country.”

You’re damn right it will be, but I don’t think there’s any turning back now. It’s going to get very bad there very soon.

And I guarantee you that the media will be blaming the victims when it does happen.