United Kaliphate: “Christianity is not a peaceful religion”

There’s a term over on Urban Dictionary which aptly describes the state of affairs we live in. That term is “Clown World”. The very first definition provided goes like this:

A phrase used to describe the current state of affairs in regards to the world (usually socially or politically). The word is employed as to state that something is ridiculous or nonsensical, in a way, “only could this be real, in a world run by clowns (clown world)”

When you read today’s topic can you really deny that this is the case?

From TRT World

The UK Home Office is reported to have refused asylum to a Christian convert by quoting Bible passages which it says prove Christianity is not a peaceful religion.


No, this isn’t a story from The Onion. The UK, a country which has suffered numerous Islamic terrorist attacks over the past few years, has seen knife attacks skyrocket in their capital city as it has become more diverse, and has seen the exposure of countless Muslim child rape gangs, is rejecting a Christian asylum seeker, because Christianity is not a peaceful religion. Forget the fact that the UK has always historically been a Christian society, and is still majority Christian today. Forget the fact that this is a country that jails people for Facebook posts which make similar comments about Islam. Even independent of all that, this is complete and utter insanity.

The Independent newspaper is reporting the story of an Iranian national who claimed asylum in 2016 and converted to Christianity because he thought it was a “peaceful” faith.

Well you thought wrong. Haven’t you ever heard of the Crusades?

If only he had stuck with the peaceful religion of Islam instead. He could have gotten asylum then.

However, the Home Office demurred, sending him a refusal letter referencing the Bible. The letter said the book of Revelations – the final book of the Bible – is “filled with imagery of revenge, destruction, death and violence,” and cites six excerpts from it.

I’d imagine those six excerpts were something along the lines of

  1. “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”
  2. “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.
  3.  “And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…”
  4. “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”
  5. “(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels… “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”
  6. “If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”

Oh wait, those are from the Quran, that peaceful book. My mistake.

It then states: “These examples are inconsistent with your claim that you converted to Christianity after discovering it is a ‘peaceful’ religion, as opposed to Islam which contains violence, rage and revenge.”

As if looking at the current state of the world wasn’t evidence enough already that Christianity is a peaceful religion, in comparison to Islam. Ignore your lying eyes everyone. The media and political establishment will tell you what’s actually true.

“Two plus two equals five. We’ve always been at war with Eastasia. Islam is peaceful. Christianity isn’t.”

The Independent contacted the Home Office, which said the letter was “not in accordance” with its policy approach to claims based on religious persecution. It also said it was working to improve the training provided to decision-makers on religious conversion.

“The people aren’t fully broken yet. Lets pretend we’re doing something, until we’re sure that the no longer have any resistance in them.”

Nathan Stevens, the asylum seeker’s caseworker, tweeted: “I’ve seen a lot over the years, but even I was genuinely shocked to read this unbelievably offensive diatribe being used to justify a refusal of asylum.”

Get used to it. When Islam is inevitably the biggest religion in the UK, not only will this become the norm, but every native Christian will either be butchered or forced to convert. Just like what always happens.



No, I’m not dead.

It’s been a very long time since I’ve posted anything. Mainly, it’s because I’ve just been far too busy to do so, but there is another reason as well. Quite frankly, I’ve given up hope that we’re going to find a peaceful solution to the problems that our world is facing. I’ve fully resigned myself to the fact that total collapse and chaos is inevitable at this point.

Back in 2016 I was optimistic that we might very well be able to “democracy” our way out of the problems we were dealing with, afterall. In June that year, we saw the UK vote to leave the EU, and in November we saw the election of Donald Trump in America. Go back and read those articles and see how happy I was. I was convinced that these two events were the beginning of the pendulum swinging back at last. That finally the collective suicidal insanity of the Western world had been overcome, and that we would finally start looking out for our own interests again.

How naive I was. In my excitement, I underestimated two things. One, the apathy and cowardice of the majority of our people, as well as their genuine ignorance as to how serious the problems we’re facing really are. The vast majority of people have no idea what’s happening to the whites in South Africa, no idea what’s going on in Sweden, have no understanding of the real history between Europe and the Islamic world, etc., and therefore are incapable of perceiving the existential threat that we’re facing. If they don’t hear about it on their Facebook timeline, off some pontificating self-righteous dickhead in Hollywood, or on the mainstream media, then as far as they’re concerned, it couldn’t possibly be true.

“South Africa? You mean that country that Morgan Freeman was president of? Sorry, that’s not important to me. Now if you don’t mind, I gotta get home to watch the latest episode of Love Island.”

The other thing I underestimated was the resolve of our enemies. I forgot that for the enemy that this is life or death. They need us to be weak in order for them to survive. This is a plan more than a century in the making, and they can’t allow any resistance to it now, when they’re so close to reaching the point of no return. They know that if we started acting in our own interests again, and realised that it isn’t necessary to destroy ourselves, that people would start asking questions about why we were even doing so in the first place.

And if we were to start asking “why”, it would inevitably lead to the question of “who” is to blame. And if that was to happen…


Our enemies have a stranglehold over the mainstream media, the financial system, pop culture, and pretty much every institution of relevance in the world. Just because they lost a couple of battles, doesn’t mean they’re in a position that requires surrender just yet. They still have the power to fight back, and as the escalation in conflict and division over the past few years has shown, that is exactly what they’ve chosen to do.

In the past few months I’ve just watched the situation deteriorate further. Instead of giving the British people the Brexit they voted for, I can see them ending up in a scenario were they actually get the worst of both worlds. Trapped in a free travel agreement with a continuation of unrestricted migration and tax-payer money being siphoned out of the country, but without the ability to actually vote on anything, like an actual EU member. Good job Theresa May. Much like your fellow childless hag, Angela Merkel, you won’t have any descendants to suffer the consequences of your actions, but your name will be cursed by your people, centuries after you’re gone… or at least it will, if there even are anymore Britons in Britain in a few centuries (I’m starting to doubt there will, myself).

In America, Trump has been failing hard. We’re more than two years in to his term, and we still see no signs of that border wall. We instead hear rhetoric about starting a war with Venezuela, and we see him talking about increasing “legal” immigration to the highest levels ever. God forbid that employers might have to actually raise wages for American workers, or begin investment in automation. Gotta keep wages down, so lets import infinity “legal” immigrants in order to depress wages as much as possible.

I’see this all the time. Economic illiterates om social media demanding the end of capitalism and the implementation of higher wages, while at the same time demanding unrestricted immigration. The law of supply and demand is too advanced a concept to comprehend for these idiots, who only understand feelings rather than logic.

At least he’s kept all his promises to Israel. Moving the embassy to Jerusalem. Cutting off all aid to the Palestinians. Passing the bill to send 38 Billion dollars to Israel over the next decade. I’m sure that will go down well with his  “America First” support base. Forget about “Make America Great Again”, there’s another slogan which is much more appropriate.

He’s been doing such a good job on the “Israel First” front, that the Jews might make an exception in his case and let him be the first Goyim Israeli President or even Prime Minister.

The straw that really broke the camel’s back for me though was the recent terrorist attack in Christ Church. Yes, I do consider it a terrorist attack. Yes the victims were Muslims, and the killer was a white guy. Yes, I oppose it completely.

However the reaction in the mainstream media and social media, seems to be a combination of obsessive virtue signalling and giddy thrill. I truly believe that many people are delighted that this attack has happened, not because they want to see Muslims die, but because FINALLY, they have a fresh “white supremacist” terror attack  that fits their narrative. They get an excuse to virtue signal and show off how progressive and caring they are. The dead Muslims are just a tool to be utilised. They get an excuse to talk about how Muslims are the real victims, and that white men are the real threat. Sure let’s forget the fact that the statistics disagree.

Feelings are all that matter. They don’t give a damn about any of the victims. They care about how they can exploit the incident to portray themselves as moral people. “OMG my heart goes out to the victims of *insert terrorist attack here*. My prayers are with their families. Please give me Facebook likes and tell me what a compassionate soul I am”. Pathological altruism is a myth, in my opinion. Pathological virtue signalling is what it actually is, and it makes me sick.

I look at the attacker, and I see people trying to figure out “why did he do it?” It’s not a fucking mystery, it’s actually quite obvious to anyone with even a shred of common sense. He did it, because he felt he had no other choice. And why did he feel he had no choice? Well, if I haven’t managed to explain that already in the previous 4 years that I’ve been writing this blog, or even just within the first few paragraphs of this post, then I doubt I’ll be able to explain it any better now.

I think this attack was a game changer because the killer in this case wasn’t like any other white mass shooters. Most of them tend to be anti-social weirdos with all kinds of personal problems. This guy in comparison came off as quite normal. He wasn’t an incel. He wasn’t a victim of bullying. He didn’t have a criminal history, he was in good shape etc. He was not the kind of person you would expect to do something like this, because unlike most of these shooters, this was a guy who actually had something to lose.

So when you take that into consideration, it begs this question. If a guy who had something to lose, was pushed far enough that he felt he had no other choice, but to do something so horrific, can you imagine how far the most downtrodden young white men will go? I’m talking about those with no friends, no dating prospects (incels), no worthwhile job opportunities (gotta give preference to minorities first), who are also constantly reminded and shamed for how “privileged” they are, who are driven close to the point of suicide, and who don’t even so much as have the option to vent about their frustrations, because their views are censored from the internet. Can you imagine it?

I think we’re going to see a lot more bloodshed, and from both sides. Muslims are already calling for “revenge” attacks in retaliation, but I can see other young white men following in the footsteps of Brenton Tarrant. The political / democratic solution has failed to do what was needed, and people are being pushed to their limits.

And personally, I just don’t care anymore. I was hoping for the peaceful solution, but at this point, I no longer think that’s an option.

Exciting times in Dublin: Somali jailed for stabbing.

If you’re an Irish person, below a certain age, you might not remember just how boring a city Dublin used to be. I’m fairly young myself, but I am just about old enough to remember those dark and dreary times. The place used to be so safe and uninteresting. It was terrible. Thank God we now get to experience exciting happenings, such as today’s story, in Dublin. It really has enriched our lives.

From Irish Examiner

A Somalian father-of-three who stabbed another man in the neck during a prearranged fight has been jailed for 18 months.

The average Somali has an IQ of 68. So you can clearly understand why people like this guy have been brought to Ireland.


That’s right, we need their incredible skills and intelligence, in order to improve our economy,  and raise our living standards to similar levels  seen in Somalia.


Judge Melanie Greally said it was “a matter of chance alone” that the wound inflicted by Mohammed Adan Ali (26) was not more serious.


What a surprise.

The court heard the knife did not strike any major blood vessels and the injured party, a Somalian acquaintance, was treated with stitches.

Well the good news is that in this situation at least, it wasn’t an Irish person that was harmed.  I really don’t give a damn what they do to each other. I just would prefer if they were doing it back in Somalia.


Em, no, what I meant, is that I’m glad they’re doing it here, because it makes our boring city so much more exciting to live in. It’s so exciting and wonderful, having violent, 68 IQ, dullards, stabbing each other in the street. They culturally enrich us. They strengthen us with their diversity. *additional generic virtue signalling comment, here*.

Ali, with an address at Balfe Road, Walkinstown, Dublin pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to assault causing harm at Mountjoy Square, Dublin, on June 22, 2017. He has no previous convictions.

He probably hasn’t been here long enough to rack up any convictions yet. If a guy was here only one month, and another guy was here 30 years, and both committed a “first offence”, does saying that that neither of them have any previous convictions, really mean the same thing for both of them.

“I know your crime was horrific, but seeing as this is your first offence, in the whole 3 days you’ve been in the country, I’m willing to go easy on you.”

At the sentence hearing, Garda Stephen Rooney told Antonia Boyle BL, prosecuting, that Ali rang the injured party asking for money to send to his daughter.

Gda Rooney said Ali used “choice words” in this call and during subsequent phone contact arranged to meet the injured party for a fight.

The court heard a third Somalian national broke up the initial confrontation, but Ali then pulled a knife from his jeans and came towards the injured party.

See? They’re not all bad. The third one broke up the fight. He’s a true hero. He’s the proof we need that Ireland needs infinity Somalis, in order to progress.

The victim later told gardaí that he didn’t run because he didn’t think Ali would use the knife.

Is it even possible to “think” with a 68 IQ?

Gda Rooney told Ms Boyle that the knife broke when Ali stabbed the injured man in the neck.

Gda Rooney agreed with Karl Monaghan BL, defending, that his client had had a difficult life and had witnessed his father’s murder while a child.

“We need to import people who suffered severe traumatic experiences, that may make them emotionally unstable and violent. It will be good for the economy.”

The garda agreed that Ali was estranged from his mother because of his continued alcohol abuse. He accepted Ali was apologetic and had a “grievance” on his mind at the time.

Judge Greally acknowledged that Ali had a history of alcohol abuse, but had addressed his issues and was deemed at low risk of re-offending.

Well if he apologised, we should probably just let him go. I’m sure he’s perfectly safe now.

She took into account the “difficult, chaotic and often violent circumstances of (his) youth in Somalia”, but said stabbing a person in the neck necessitated a custodial sentence.

If only we could figure out what causes all the violence in Somalia. Also, what causes Somalis to be violent when they aren’t in Somalia. We know for a fact that it couldn’t be the Somali people themselves, because that’s politically incorrect, which means that it couldn’t possibly be true.

I guess we’ll never figure it out.

Faysal Ahmed, Barkhad Abdi, Barkhad Abdirahman, Mahat Ali,
A real mystery on our hands.

“We love freedom of speech. Also, let’s suppress freedom of speech.


Two days ago, Ireland had a referendum to remove the criminal offence of blasphemy from our constitution. It was an ineffective amendment, under which nobody had actually been charged in over 150 years, but there was a principle involved, and that principle is freedom of speech. Regardless of how ineffective it was, the fact is, Ireland still technically had a a constitutional amendment in place that in theory, put limits on our freedom of speech. So naturally, anyone who seriously values freedom of speech (which I do), was in favour of repealing it.  Although turnout was rather poor, of those who did come out, a huge majority voted in favour of its repeal, suggesting that the majority support freedom of speech.

Or so you would think.

From Irish Council of Civil Liberties

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) has welcomed the Yes vote in the referendum on blasphemy as an important step for free speech and the modernisation of our democracy.

I agree. There’s no place in any modern day, free society, for laws that place restriction on a person’s freedom of speech. I too, welcome this result.

ICCL campaigned for a Yes vote in this referendum and we have consistently advocated this change over many years. This positive result brings Ireland into line with international best practice in human rights, as called for by the UN Human Rights Committee.

Echoing the recommendations of the Constitutional Convention, we are now calling on the government to repeal sections 36 and 37 of the Defamation Act 2009 which define the criminal offence of blasphemy.

They’re coming across very reasonable so far, aren’t they? Watch how that changes in the next paragraph.

We are also calling on the Government to take immediate action to coordinate state bodies’ responses to hate- and hostility-based crime and to bring forward legislation to protect from hate- and hostility-based crime.

And there it is. They talk a big game about how they value freedom of speech, but really what they mean is, they value freedom of speech that they personally agree with. Within 24 hours of the result of a referendum, ostensibly in favour of improving Ireland’s freedom of speech, they’re calling for legislation that will make free speech even more restrictive, all while claiming to celebrate free speech. It’s a literal real world example of Orwellian doublethink.

“Restrictions on free speech, is free speech.”

Executive Director of the ICCL, Liam Herrick, said:

“During our campaign for a Yes vote, our guiding principle was respect for freedom of expression.

You mean freedom of expression that  you and your organisation personally agree with.

However, we have also argued that the right to free speech is not absolute

No you fucking prick, the whole point of free speech is that it is absolute. Once you put restrictions on it, it’s no longer “free”. Therefore it’s not “free speech”. This is not a difficult concept to understand.

and should be limited to the degree necessary to protect people from hate- and hostility-motivated crime.

All crimes by definition, involve hostility.  And the victim suffers the same, no matter what. It shouldn’t matter whether the victim is LGBT or straight. Black or white. Male or female. Native Irish or immigrant. Christian or Muslim, etc., etc. If they’re an innocent person, who has been victimised by a criminal act, they all deserve the same justice, for the same type of crime. Creating a victimhood hierarchy, were certain demographics, receive harsher sentences than others, or certain victims get more justice than others, is objectively a ridiculous and divisive way to do things. But of course, we already have the precedent from other countries, to know what this is really all about. it’s not about protecting minorities. It’s about punishing dissidents who speak out against the genocide that is being inflicted upon us.

We’re going to end up like the UK, were people are arrested for social media posts that express wrongthink about all the terror attacks and Muslim child rape gangs that have been inflicted upon them. It’s “hatespeech” to speak the truth about things like this in the UK. Do you really think it will be any different in Ireland?

Hate crime is something which is entirely different to blasphemy as it is directed towards individuals or groups, rather than ideas or institutions. There is no legislation in place to deal with hate crime in Ireland at the moment.”

And there shouldn’t ever be. There should be equally severe sentences, regardless of the demographics involved in crime. A black guy who beats up a white guy, should get the same sentence as a white guy who beats up a black guy. A Muslim who murders a Christian, should get the same sentence as a a Christian who murders a Muslim. And a person who expresses their personal opinion on Islam, and the people who follow it, should get absolutely no sentence at all, same as those who express their opinion on Christianity and its followers.

Ireland is obliged by European and international human rights law to have in place a robust framework to respond to and prevent hate- and hostility-based crime.

Yet another reason to leave the EU.

In April ICCL released a report which showed that Ireland is seriously deficient in addressing hate crime when compared to other EU member States.

No doubt, we’ll be falling over ourselves to play catch up, as quickly as possible. I can honestly see Ireland going “full Sweden”, the way things are going.

The Lifecycle of a Hate Crime: Country Report for Ireland shows that from the point at which a victim reports a crime to An Garda Síochána to the point at which a judge sentences an offender, the hate element of a crime is filtered out of the criminal justice process.

And I’ve still yet to see an explanation as to why it should be.

Though it won’t matter. You can be sure that the majority of our treacherous politicians, would be more than happy to oblige, and bring in laws that restrict our ability to speak out against what they’re doing to us.


Tough times ahead.

20 “British” men jailed for sexually abusing girls.


Just business as usual in Britain. But it has been a while since I’ve made a new post, so why not discuss it?

From The Journal

BRITISH PROSECUTORS REVEALED today that 20 men had been jailed for raping and sexually abusing more than a dozen girls aged as young as 11 in one town between 2004 and 2011.

Nice to see them arrest and convict the actual rapists for a change. Normally, the typical policy followed by the police of the United Caliphate, is to arrest the fathers of the girls, when they try to save them.


England’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the convictions came in a series of trials held since January that could not be reported at the time due to a blanket ban imposed by the court.

Yes of course there was a ban imposed. Wouldn’t want the sleeping native Brits to wake up from their coma of reality TV and Premier League football, and see what’s actually going on around them. The multicultural experiment is a disaster. Their children are having their lives destroyed, and it’s deliberately being inflicted upon them from above.

These horrific crimes are sickening and, first and foremost, I commend the bravery of those who’ve suffered abuse in coming forward, said Home Secretary Sajid Javid, the interior minister.

“Sajid Javid”

I can guarantee you that he was specifically selected by his party to be the one to make that statement, purely for the propaganda value of “See, not all people of Pakistani descent, agree with what those other Pakistani men did. This guy is one of the good majority. The bad ones are a tiny minority.”

Don’t fall into the trap. Every move is calculated to manipulate us.

The gang operated in Huddersfield – a town of 160,000 in northern England.

Well they had to operate somewhere. Rochdale was already taken.

And Rotherham.

And Aylesbury.

And Banbury.

And Halifax.

And Newcastle.

And Bristol.

And… actually, you know what? At this point, it’s probably quicker to name British towns and cities that HAVEN’T had a Muslim rape gang scandal.

The group’s ringleader – identified as 35-year-old Amere Singh Dhaliwal – was jailed for life and told he must serve a minimum of 18 years in prison.

“Amere Singh Dhaliwal”

Typical British name. Could easily have been a guy named Nigel Smith.

Amere Singh Dhaliwal, pictured outside of court.

“The men who have been convicted of these appalling crimes deliberately targeted their victims because of their vulnerability,” said CPS spokesman Michael Quinn.

They deliberately targeted them because of their ethnicity. In the overwhelming majority of cases, the victims were white.

But yeah, keep drinking that “white privilege / only whites can be racist / diversity is our strength / Muslims are the real victims” kool-aid.


They groomed them and exploited them for their own sexual gratification. Sometimes, they used threats and violence. Typically, they plied them with alcohol and drugs.

And lets not forget that the British government were the ones who inflicted them on these girls in the first place, the British police refused to do anything about it, until they had no choice, and the British media deliberately covered up. They’re all every bit to blame as the perpetrators themselves.

The men are all British of South Asian origin, mostly of Pakistani heritage. British media reports said many perpetrators have never been identified.

They aren’t supposed to be identified. That’s the point. If the media had their way, none of them would be identified.

“The way you treated these girls defies understanding. This abuse was vile and wicked,” judge Geoffrey Marson was revealed to have told one group of 16 men he jailed earlier this year.

More pointless rhetoric. What are they going to do to prevent this sort of thing from happening again? I’ll answer for you.


As cases of sexual abuse with which the courts have to deal, this case comes top of the scale.

Is it really any worse than all the others that have been uncovered, and all the others that i can guarantee you are still happening right now, and have yet to be exposed?

The ringleader was convicted of 54 separate counts that included 22 rapes of 11 different girls.

“You treated them as commodities to be passed around for your own sexual gratification and the gratification of others,” the judge told him.

Yeah, no shit.

Children’s lives have been ruined and families profoundly affected by seeing their children, over months and years, out of control, having been groomed by you and other members of your gang.
And those cases are just the  tip of the iceberg.

Car plows into crowd in Sweden.

You may have noticed that I haven’t posted about any terrorist attacks in quite some time, something I used to do on very regular basis. This isn’t because they haven’t still been happening. It’s because it was quite frankly happening so often, that it was actually getting boring to post about it every time. There once was a time (like three years ago), when any one of these attacks would have been the top international news story for a week or so. It was unusual and shocking to see these attacks take place. But that was then, and in just a few short years, it has happened so often, that it has gone from being something shocking and traumatic, to being the new normal. Nobody is phased anymore. People just take it for granted, that this sort of thing is going to happen every once in a while. We’ve been desensitised.

Nevertheless, just because I’m no longer writing about every single attack that happens, that doesn’t mean I’m going to stop writing about them entirely. Sometimes, I come across a story that I actually feel is still worth taking a look at. And with that in mind, lets do exactly that.

From Express

A CAR ploughed into a crowd of children and their parents on a walk near Karlshamn, in Sweden, police revealed today. 

Those damn self driving cars and their propensity to run over people. Must be a Tesla model.

Wanted: For creating self-driving cars, while high as a kite.

Two pupils were hurt with a police manhunt now underway.

A manhunt? So that means there was a driver then? Guess it wasn’t a Tesla after all.

Apologies Mr. Musk. I’ll never judge you again. Well, at least not until your next rocket explodes.

A spokesman for ‘s police service said children “threw themselves” out of the way of the car, which appeared to have aimed directly for the group of 100 people.

He said: “The car accelerated into the group of students and teachers.

“The car increased speed and drove straight towards them.

So it was no accident then? I wonder what the actual motivation could be?

I’m going to predict “Mental Illness” myself.

“He drove into two of the students. One was injured on the wrist and possibly the other student was also injured.”

Thankfully, very little damage was done. Not only is the guy who did this, a massive piece of shit, but he’s also a massive failure as well. Plows into a crowd of 100, and doesn’t even manage to kill one.

Police have today appealed for any information on the horrifying incident, which took place at 1pm local time (12pm BST) yesterday.

Rest easy everyone. The Swedish police are on the case.

I bet people feel safer already.

The group was made up of 100 children and 10 teachers from Mjallby secondary school.

They were walking from Hinnedalsvagen to Grundsjon as part of a social event. 

The car was described as a black or dark blue Saab. It was driving at around 25mph when it hit the crowd. 

The driver fled the scene, police said.

Notice how there’s no description of the attacker? Just in case you need a reminder why this is…

But yeah, I think we can safely guess the background of the attacker, just from pattern recognition.

Witnesses were unable to identify whether the driver was male of female. 

Actually, you know what?Maybe it was a native Swede after all.

“We’re unable to identify whether they’re male or female”.

Police are appealing for any information. 

And no doubt, if someone calls up and gives the police an accurate description of what the attacker looks like, the caller will probably be arrested instead, for “hate speech”.

You had your chance Sweden, just a few short weeks ago, to try and vote your way out of this mess. Instead, you chose to vote for more of the same. So enjoy the results of the vote, Swedes. Something tells me, that the next four years are going to be very long and very difficult for you.

The “most Swedish” story I ever read.

Why does this keep happening? I keep thinking to myself that I’ve heard the very worst from Sweden, and that they’ll never manage to sink any lower in my eyes. Yet somehow, they always manage to find new ways to amaze me with the depths they have managed to sink. Scraping the bottom of the barrel? Oh please, Sweden managed to scrape away the very surface of the barrel itself, and then managed to scrape away the Earth underneath were the barrel was standing, and come out the other side in Australia. This has got to be it. There couldn’t possibly be another story that sums up the dire situation in Sweden, better than this one.


At least, I’m saying that now. If history has taught me anything, it is to never expect Sweden to finally stop shocking me. I’m sure they’ll eventually have an even worse story than this one.

From Politicoat

Gothenburg, Sweden – The first ever man-free music festival kicked off in Gothenburg last week as a result of migrant sexual assaults at music events in years past. 

I’m pretty sure I covered that story myself actually. Or possibly a story very similar to it. I have no way of being sure, I mean there are so many stories about Sweden,and I’ve covered so many myself, I honestly can’t keep track anymore.


As the 2018 Bravalla music festival was canceled due to rapes by Arabic and African welfare migrants in previous years,


You aren’t supposed to name their ethnicity.

the 2018 man-free Gothenburg music festival was heralded as the “most progressive in history” because attendees, performers, journalists, and even police providing security for the event had to be female.

Yes and we all know how well the Female police have done in Sweden.

“Sir, sir. Please cooperate. Sir. Don’t test me sir. I learned how to defend myself in Finland.

“We expected thousands of women to attend as a certain testosterone, I mean certain tension had been lifted,” said event spokesperson Rebecka Ljung touting the concert a “safe zone for all women”.

A safe zone you say? Were certain people are kept out? You mean… like a border perhaps?

Although the two-day music festival banned men, transgenders were welcome as festival organizers gleefully accepted any male depressed and crazy enough to pump himself full of psychotropic and hormone-altering drugs trying to convince himself he is a woman.

I bet you can already predict the plot twist already.

News of the all-female (and transgender male) music festival spread fast as Swedish media eager to tout hatred for western civilization provided non-stop coverage leading up to the event.

Here it comes…

Knowledge about the festival, in fact, became so widespread hoards of foreign welfare migrants looting and burning cars in the streets of Gothenburg took time away from destroying Sweden to attend the event in hopes of making involuntary sexual contact with female concertgoers.

And how did that plan turn out, you might ask?


Initially, the all-male migrant gangs were turned away from the man-free music festival

Wow that’s a shocker.

but quickly gained access after contending they were ‘awakened Muslim transgender non-men’.

But that sure isn’t.

As gangs of these ‘Muslim transgender non-men’ made their way through crowds of female concertgoers, ‘non-problems’ began to occur as scores of women were maybe kind of certain something had happened to them.

“At first a lot of women were angry about all these men coming into our women-only event and sexually assaulting everyone, but then the men told us they were Muslim transgenders,” said a 27-year-old festival attendee who endured the diversity she received at the hands of her attackers in order not to offend Muslims or transgenders.

As the immigrant transgenders continued to diversify concert goers, Swedish female police officers in attendance were powerless to stop the consensual assaults in fear of being reprimanded by their superiors for intolerance and discrimination against migrants.

“Many women attending the music festival, including our own officers, were not familiar with the term Muslim transgenders.  In the interest of Swedish acceptance and compassion for all ideas, opinions, people, plants, and animals our officers decided to supervise these diversifications instead of adopting a stance of intolerance and bigotry,” said Sweden’s National Police Commissioner Dan Eliasson in regards to hoards of Arabic and African illiterates having their way with scores of female Swedes.

A bunch of women were getting sexually assaulted by Muslim men who pretended to be transgender. The women themselves put up with it, and the police refused to do anything to stop it, because both groups were afraid of being thought of as transphobic or racist.

this-is-sweden-sweden-let-in-a-ton-of-migrants-1666237Can you see what I mean when I said that this is probably the “most Swedish” story that I’ve ever read?

To date, none of the so-called transgender migrants who diversified female festival-goers have been arrested or even questioned about their actions during the concert.

And I doubt any of them ever will be either.

But if you think the story couldn’t possibly get anymore absurd, then read on for the conclusion, which really pushes it over the edge.

Several Swedish male nationals were, however, taken into custody for disturbing the peace. During the music festival news of the migrant transgender diversification of female concertgoers spread over Facebook and other social media streaming services.

As Enraged fathers, brothers, husbands, and boyfriends of female attendees entered the concert venue to stop transgender migrants from diversifying their daughters, wives, sisters, and girlfriends several were arrested by police on charges of assault, racial and preferential identity discrimination which can levy a term of twenty years in prison under Swedish law.

So lets just summarise this story once again.

  • Sweden throws open their borders to the very worst countries in the world, and sees their rates of rape and sexual assault skyrocket as a result.
  • Sweden stops recording crimes based on ethnicity, and pretends it’s just a problem with men in general. Coincidentally, all Swedish men became rapists at around the same time as Sweden starts seeing a massive increase in migration from Africa and the Middle East.
  • They set up women’s only music festivals, so women won’t experience sexual assault.
  • Muslim men hear about the festival and get in by claiming to be transgender.
  • Muslim men start sexually assaulting the women in the women’s only festival.
  • The Women themselves do nothing, for fear of appearing intolerant to migrants / transgender people.
  • The police do nothing, for fear of appearing intolerant to migrants / transgender people.
  • The men who engaged in sexual assault are not arrested.
  • Fathers, husbands, brothers, and boyfriends of the sexually assaulted women try to defend them. They do get arrested.

I can’t even be angry when I read stories like this anymore. It’s just too insane for my mind to even make sense of.All I can do is just sit here and try my best to make sense of it all.

UK: “Universities need to hand out more degrees to black students, just because…”


“Diversity is our greatest strength. We don’t need to explain why this is. We just know it to be true. Just like how we know that the sun revolves around the earth, and only racists heretics would ever question the obvious wisdom of that”.

Well it seems that diversity is being threatened in the UK. For reasons that are completely unexplainable (but most likely caused by racism), black students are failing to graduate from university at the same rate as their white counterparts. Because diversity and equality of outcome are more important than holding everyone to the same high standards as each other, something needs to be done about this ASAP.

From The Telegraph

Universities could be punished unless they give a higher proportion of top degrees to black students, under new proposals drawn up by the regulator.

Notice how there’s no mention of a requirement for the black students having to actually achieve the grades necessary to earn a top degree? They just have to be given it anyway.

Yep. Aren’t you so oppressed?

The Office for Students (OfS) has announced plans to overhaul its guidelines for boosting diversity in higher education, in what it says is the “biggest shake up” since 2004.

Are they ever going to explain why  boosting “diversity” is such an important thing to do? What are the actual benefits of this increased diversity? Why is it so essential? Why do we need it so badly, that we need to do away with “fairness”, and “merit” in order to achieve it? In what ways will the benefits of this increased diversity, outweigh the benefits of maintaining the current high standards?


They will never answer these questions, because quite frankly, there is no logical answer to them. This is purely based on ideology, rather than common sense.

If institutions fail to comply with the regulator’s new “tougher” national targets for increasing the number of disadvantaged students, they could be penalised through a fine or even de-registered.

So they say it’s about helping “disadvantaged” students, but at the same time, are specifically focusing on race, rather than economic background. As far as they’re concerned, a black student from a rich family is disadvantaged, when compared to a white student from a poor family. Of course, anyone with any knowledge of what is going on, knows this is not really about helping students from disadvantaged backgrounds. It’s simply about hurting the prospects of white people.

Chris Millward, the OfS director for fair access and participation, said that universities will no longer be able to “mark their own homework” on their plans to up their intake of 18-year-olds from poor backgrounds.  

Instead, the new regulator, which came into force earlier this year, plans to set a series of national targets that all universities will be expected to meet.   

These will not be limited to targets for admitting more school leavers from deprived households, but will also include addressing the gap in degree attainment between black and white students, according to OfS proposals.

They never consider the idea of investigating WHY this gap in degree attainment exists in the first place. Understanding the root causes of the gap and trying to go from there to solve it, is not part of the agenda. Instead, they just want to manipulate the results and achieve equality of outcome without an equality of merit.


There has been an almost 50 per cent increase in the number of black and ethnic minority students in England between 2007 and 2016.

“Mass, replacement level immigration is just a Neo-Nazi, white supremacist, conspiracy theory.”

78 per cent of white students graduated last year with a first class of upper second class degree, compared to just 53 per cent of black students.

“Racism must be the cause for this. There couldn’t possibly be another explanation.”

Qualifications before attending university, although a key factor in degree outcomes, do not explain the differences between ethnic groups, according to data analysed by Universities UK.

No, but I’ve got a theory on what could explain the difference instead.

bell curve.jpg

In a consultation document, published today, the regulator sets out a number of areas that universities should work on, such as combatting the higher drop-out rate among poorer students compared to their middle-class peers.  

Mr Millward said: “Universities have always set their own targets, and have used different measures of success. They were kind of marking their own homework.

“We are going to set clearer national targets which they will refer to: not just looking at access but do students finish their courses? What is their degree outcome depending on background?”

I can guarantee you that this will all fail miserably. Governments are too incompetent to make anything work right.

Mr Millward said that universities have spent hundreds of millions of pounds on measures aimed at diversifying their intake of students, but have paid little or no attention to whether their schemes were effective. 

Hundreds of millions of pounds down the toilet in order to pursue this obsession with diversity, and we’ve still yet to hear an explanation about why this diversity is even desirable. Be perfectly honest with yourself. Even ignoring  the financial cost, and just focusing on everything else that has happened, has any country at all benefited from increased diversity? Has Sweden benefited? Has Germany? Has Italy? Has France? Has the UK? Has *insert any country here*? Seriously, what are the actual benefits of this diversity? Will anyone ever actually answer the question?

“I don’t doubt that universities are committed to improving access. They are spending a lot of money and doing a lot but they don’t understand enough about whether it’s working,” he told The Daily Telegraph.

It’s never going to work. Just like the way the first world has thrown trillions of dollars at Africa in foreign  aid and development over the past 50 years, and if anything, a lot of the countries there are going backwards rather than forwards.  You can keep throwing money at the problem all you want, but it’s never going to make a difference, because a lack of funding is not the cause.

“We are upping the expectation on evaluation. Once we know that, we can target [budgets] where it can make a difference.”


Last year, universities spent a total of around £800 million on projects to increase access and around half of this was spent on bursaries for students from poor households.

“I’m not arguing against bursaries being provided, particularly because students can be really challenged by the cost when they are at university,” Mr Millward said.

And yet despite spending that much money, they’re no closer to solving the “”problem”.

“But there is very little evidence that bursaries improve access. That is a really obvious areas where we need to evaluate. [We need to] ask why it is spent and what impact it is having?”


He actually said something that I agree with.

Dr Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, said he welcomes the emphasis on evaluation

“There is a great deal of activity to improve access taking place across the sector but what we need now is a clear overview of which interventions make the biggest difference,” he said. “We need to be clearer on what works, and what doesn’t, if we are to shift the dial.”

Unfortunately, they’re not going to use the scientific method when trying to figure this situation out. They will automatically refuse to consider certain possibilities, limit the scope of what they will actually investigate, fail to find a possible solution, and either just go back to throwing money at the problem (and getting nowhere in the process), or just creating a two tier system, were black students are held to lower standards than white students, and see their graduation rate increase that way instead.

And this is what they call “”Equality”.

Trump mentions the South African situation. Guy called “Bernstein” freaks out about it.

So the South African situation, which I have given frequent attention to over the past few years, has really started heating up recently. It has gotten so bad in fact, that it has even come to the attention of Donald Trump.

Anyone who has paid any attention to what has been going on in South Africa, will be aware that all Trump has done here, is simply tell a truth that the Western media has deliberately ignored and covered up. Nothing he has said here is offensive. Nothing he said here is racist. And nothing he has said here is untrue.

So of course, he has managed to cause massive offence by saying it. And this “Bernstein” fellow really sums it up quite well.

What can you really say about this? It’s a completely hysterical reaction. The US regularly goes to war with countries ostensibly to “protect human rights”, for far less justification, than what is happening to white people in South Africa , and nobody bats an eye. Trump simply draws attention to what is happening to them, and people like this Bernstein fellow have a meltdown over it. The idea of white people ever being thought of as victims of racial persecution, is a concept they refuse to accept. And when you look at Bernstein’s tweets, it’s obvious why. They are terrified of white people in other parts of the world seeing what’s happening, and realising that the same will happen to them eventually, and waking up to the threat. They want to keep us asleep, until it’s too late to reverse what is happening.

But why is this Bernstein fellow so upset at the idea of white people waking up to the genocide that we’re facing? What is his interest in all this?



Yeah, I just can’t figure out why this “Bernstein” fellow would have a problem with Trump drawing attention to the plight of South African whites.

What do you think could be the reason, dear reader?


Try to figure it out.