Is this Britain or Sweden?

We’re all familiar by now with Sweden’s problems with regards to sexual violence. However, just because Sweden is an exceptionally bad case, it doesn’t mean that they’re going it alone. Plenty of other countries are in the process of playing catch up with them. Today’s story from the soon to be known as “United Caliphate”, really sounds like the kind of thing that would give Sweden a serious run for its money.

From Telegraph

A 17-year-old girl was sexually assaulted three times by three separate men within an hour in an “unprecedented” and gravely traumatising ordeal.

It’s truly disgusting, that it isn’t safe for young women and girls to walk home at night, without the risk of getting sexually assaulted on the way. One such attack is awful enough. The fact that this girl experienced three separate incidents, from three different men, all on a single night, is absolutely shocking. There’s always going to be scum who engage in sexual violence, no matter where you go, but this sort of thing is completely unnatural in what is supposed to be a first world, civilised society.

The teenager was walking home from a nightclub in Tower Hamlets, east London, when she was targeted by the men in quick succession.

Tower Hamlets?

Why does that term sound familiar to me?

tower
Oh, of course. Why am I not surprised?

The local authority announced on Friday that it was investing £3million to put an additional 19 officers on the streets in the crime-ridden borough after losing almost 200 officers in seven years due to government cuts.

Yes, just keep throwing money at the problem, in the hopes that it will go away, without the root cause having ever been dealt with. The crack is getting bigger, and you’re running out of paper to cover it over. You need to acknowledge the real problem, while you still have a chance to deal with it. It’s not as if people can’t see what it is. You just don’t want to admit that it’s a problem.

CV3xRu8WIAAlKUu

Police said there was absolutely no link between the “opportunistic” attacks on the teenager, two of which were described as very serious, possibly rape. The third suspect may have been part of a group.

I doubt there was any link between them at all. They just behaved in the way that comes naturally to them, and that doesn’t require any organisation or cooperation. They saw an “infidel whore” walking the streets, not dressed modestly enough for their standards, unaccompanied by any male family member, and they treated her in the same way they’d treat any other woman in such a scenario.

hqdefault

The victim, who is a student, was so deeply traumatised that her memory was affected. Officers fear she may have been drugged.

I can’t blame her for possibly repressing her memories of what happened. I only hope that if the memories do start to resurface, that she gets the help and support that she needs to get through it, rather than having to face it alone.

It is hoped that the men will be identified by CCTV images, one of whom in particular – the second suspected attacker –  is clearly pictured.

The Orwellian surveillance state might finally come in useful for something other than arresting people for so called “hate speech” on social media.

Oh wait, probably not, because whenever Muslims commit sex crimes in the UK, they usually get a slap on the wrist instead.

oxford-muslims-guilty2-e1435252399324
…and that’s why their victims didn’t matter enough to deserve real justice.

The girl’s ordeal began shortly before midnight on Friday September 29. She had spent the evening at a club with friends but became separated from them and was trying to make her way home.

She was seen on camera at around 11.55pm being carried down Cambridge Heath Road in Hackney by the first suspect.

The pair are then seen appearing to go into a doorway, after which the man, who was wearing dark clothing, is not seen again on camera. Items of the top half of the girl’s clothing were subsequently found nearby.

We’re always hearing about an alleged “rape culture” in the west, where rape is normalised and trivialised. Well I don’t think we have a homegrown one, but we’re sure in the process of establishing one right now.

Shortly after midnight, another CCTV camera captures the girl stumbling down nearby Mint Street being followed by a different man, suspect two, on a racing bike.

Police believe the bearded man followed her as she turned the corner and headed in the direction of Bethnal Green train station.

“Bearded man”

Is that really the best description they can give? Surely there are other details they can release about this guy’s physical description. Of course, we know the real reason that they won’t.

beard-41
“OK young lady. We understand that the suspect had a beard, and that’s all we have to go on. Do you think you can pick out your attacker from this line-up? Was it this man?”
images
“… or perhaps this man?”

 

wheeler1-e1443864488263.jpg
“…or maybe this man?”
santa-claus-orig
“… or perhaps this is the guy. Don’t worry, they’re behind a one-way mirror, so they can’t see you.”

 

The images indicate that the man then directed her into an area set back from the street where they remained for a period of time. The CCTV then shows the suspect walking away.

The girl, whose clothing appears dishevelled, emerges shortly afterwards and continues down Corfield Street.

Just minutes later, at around 12.45pm, detectives believe the victim was attacked a third time, possibly by two or three men.

CCTV captures a third suspect walking down the street, possibly joined by two others who can be seen in the distance under some trees.

The man appears to bend down towards a spot on the kerb, between two parked cars, and is believed to have seriously assaulted the teenager.

This level of depravity is almost hard to process as being real. A few years ago, I never would have expected to be reading something like this. But this is Europe in 2017, and if the signs are anything to go by, then 2018, 2019, 2020, etc., are only going to be even worse for this sort of thing. We’re rapidly heading to a stage were women will have to cover themselves up, and not go outside alone anymore, for their own safety, just like how it is in the Middle East and North Africa. Can anyone honestly say that they don’t think we’re heading that way? There is no magical soil in Europe, which causes people who walk on it, to adopt European values. European values were created by European people. When the European people are replaced by non-European people, our values will be replaced with us.

quote-europe-is-no-longer-europe-it-is-eurabia-a-colony-of-islam-where-the-islamic-invasion-oriana-fallaci-9-24-83.jpg

He is then seen walking away on his own. He has a distinctive gait which gives him the appearance of walking unevenly and perhaps being slightly bow-legged.

Well that’s a better description than “bearded man”, I guess.

A member of the public then spotted the victim lying on the ground in distress and called 999.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman said such a string of completely random attacks was “incredibly rare” and that detectives investigating the alleged crime had not seen anything like it in careers spanning more than 20 years.

Oh get used to it detectives. You’ll be seeing a lot more cases just like it in the coming years. I can guarantee it.

Detective Inspector Suzanne Jordan, from the Met’s Child Abuse and Sexual Offences Command, (CAS0) added: “This is a horrific multiple sexual assault on an young female who was simply making her way home after a night out. We would like to thank the members of the public who intervened to help her and possibly prevented her ordeal from continuing even further.

“We believe two of the three were very serious sexual assaults indeed, and are determined to catch the persons responsible for these hideous crimes. I would urge anyone who recognises either male in these images to contact us as a matter of urgency.

“We’d also like to speak to any witnesses who haven’t already come forward, or anyone with any information at all however insignificant they believe it might be – it could prove crucial to progressing our enquiries.”

“But whatever you do, don’t say anything that could be interpreted as ‘hate speech’, or else we’ll have to arrest you too.”

scot1

John Biggs, Mayor of Tower Hamlets, said: “I was shocked and appalled by this terrible attack. My thoughts remain with the victim and her family at this difficult time and the council is supporting the police in their ongoing investigations.”

Yes, it’s very shocking because as we all know, Islamic cultures are renowned for their respect for women’s rights. The only possible explanation is that three white, British men must have traveled into the Muslim majority Tower Hamlets, and attacked that girl, with the hope of framing the Muslim community for it. It’s the only possible explanation that makes sense to me.

The council announced that it was ploughing in funds from its reserves to bolster its police force by 19, taking the total number of council-funded officers in the borough to 39.

Mr Biggs said: “The Government might think cutting police budgets is acceptable but we do not. Tower Hamlets is committed to working with and investing in the police to protect residents.”

A better way to protect the residents would be to stop importing incompatible people from completely alien and hostile cultural backgrounds, who have no business being in the country, and having them live among them. I’m still waiting for an explanation as to how mass Islamic immigration has been a net positive to European countries.

Tower Hamlets, which has the highest volume of anti-social behaviour calls to the police in London, has lost 23 per cent of its force in seven years.

The additional officers the council has pledged to fund over the next three years will be tasked with tackling crime and anti-social behaviour as well as acid attacks, drug dealing and violent crime.

A spokeswoman said she believed more and more councils would be forced to fund their own officers in order to future-proof themselves against government cuts to the police budget.

At the rate things are going, law and order will eventually collapse, and we’ll be seeing a “Lord of the Flies” type scenario occur. I’m not optimistic about the future at all.

ook3ZOQ

Advertisements

Bread and circuses… and politics.

Juvenal.jpg

We live in a decaying society. All over the Western world, economic prospects are bleak. Good jobs, which pay a decent wage, and which are fulfilling to do, are few and far between, with rapidly increasing automation only going to make this even worse as time goes by. Affordable housing is an unobtainable fantasy for most young people these days. In Europe, the Barbarians are at our gates, and are actually being welcomed in with open arms, predictable consequences for doing so be damned. In America, racial tensions are the worst they’ve been in almost half a century. Terrorist attacks are happening so regularly, that they barely get any attention anymore, unless they have an exceptionally high body count. Gender relations are completely out of whack, with divorces on the rise, an inability for people to make relationships work at all, and with many men just giving up on them entirely, turning to pornography, masturbation, and soon, sex robots, as an alternative. We live in an absolute nightmare.

On some level, most people know that things aren’t right, and look for distractions from it all. This is nothing unusual, and has been a pretty common occurrence in societies on the verge of collapse. The Romans had a term for it, “Bread and Circuses”.  Basically, the Romans had figured out that as long as the people weren’t going hungry, and had some form of entertainment to take their minds off of things, that they could be appeased, and the real problems facing the empire would be ignored. Of course ignoring the problems doesn’t make them go away, so Rome eventually collapsed under their weight, circa 476 AD.

83d3aa8fb30a403fae8356bc9687345c
The rise of Christianity certainly didn’t help.

Things really aren’t that much different today. Society is going to hell, but people have plenty of “circuses” to keep them pacified. Movies, TV, professional sports, social media, videogames, etc., etc., all fulfill this role in the modern world. However, I’ve noticed a very interesting phenomenon that has been taking place in recent years. The whole point of the circuses is to distract people from the problems that are all around them, a temporary respite from them, if you will.

In other words, they’re supposed to be a safe haven from, not a reminder of these problems, because if they remind people of the problems, they lose all effectiveness as a distraction from them. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing happening these days. The problems people are trying to distract themselves from, are becoming conflated with the distractions themselves.

Lets take sports as our first example, specifically, the NFL in America. As I already mentioned, professional sports are a perfect example of the modern equivalent to the Roman games, and if anything, are probably the closest thing to them. The NFL was a very popular distraction for many Americans from the everyday problems that they face, or at least they were until…

160916164535-05-nfl-players-protest-super-169.jpg
…this.

So for those who are unaware, the NFL is currently being plagued by massive and very public controversy. Many black players are choosing to kneel, rather than standing in respect when the national anthem is being played. Their reason for doing this is to protest against alleged racial injustices that black people supposedly face in America. This of course serves as a reminder of the problem that is America’s increasingly poor race relations, a problem that people would rather distract themselves from. So can you imagine how this must look to white NFL fans who see this happening? They’re ordinary, working class people, dealing with problems of their own, that they wish to distract themselves from, and they turn on the TV and see a bunch of millionaires, paid to play a sport they probably enjoy playing anyway, whining about how oppressed they are, and how privileged their audience is. How do you suppose that has gone down with the audience?

nfl
Yep

So the NFL has actually gone from being America’s most popular sport, to its least popular, directly as a result of these protests. People didn’t watch the NFL to be lectured to, and to be reminded about the problems in their society. They watched it as a distraction, and now that that distraction is gone, they’re tuning out instead.

But hey, it’s not just the NFL that is failing in its duty as a distraction for the masses. There’s plenty of other forms of entertainment doing the same thing. Look at late night, comedian, talk show hosts like Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, John Oliver, etc. Ever since Trump came along, he has pretty much made up the entirety of their acts. Now I’m not saying that it’s anything unusual for comedians to take shots at political figures, and I certainly don’t think that Trump should be exempt from their ridicule. There’s definitely a lot of material to work with there. The problem is, they aren’t simply mocking Trump himself. They’re mocking his base, his supporters, the people who voted for him. That’s 63 MILLION people that they’re attacking. It’s quite possible that many of these 63 million people were at one point, viewers of one or more of these comedians. Do you think they’re still fans now after having been labeled as “racists”, “misogynists”, “dumb rednecks” etc., simply for voting for what they felt was the better choice for themselves and their families? I would be shocked if they are.

Why would any of these people tune in to distract themselves from the problems in their lives, if they know they’re just going to be mocked and insulted by the hosts? What is the benefit to them? There are two other notable examples of entertainment media that I can think of off the top of my head, which are having similar problems. Video games, and comics.

Long considered refuges for geeks and nerds, in the western world at least, video games and comics have both generally been most popular with males, particularly white ones. Most of the most popular super-heroes have historically been white males and this makes sense when you consider the fact that most of them were created in America, back when America was still somewhere between 85 and 90 percent white. That’s not to say that there hasn’t been female and racial minority super-heroes as as well, but the most popular ones of all, such as Batman, Superman, Spider-man, Iron Man, Captain America, etc., have all been white men. Similarly, popular video-games have usually had white male protagonists, because these are more relatable to the biggest target market, but again, plenty of exceptions exist.

In recent years however, there have been attacks on these two industries from outside. People who aren’t even fans of them have whined about how “noninclusive” “racist” and “sexist” they are, and have demanded changes to better suit their own tastes. One of the two big comic publishers, Marvel, has done exactly that. Rather than do the sensible thing of better promoting their existing female and racial minority characters, or creating brand new heroes altogether, they took the approach of taking their most beloved and popular characters, with decades of history and reader attachment, and either replaced them, or made drastic changes to them. Lets take a look at some of these changes that they’ve made the past few years.

Thor.0.0-970x545.jpg
They’ve replaced Thor with a woman.
150904-chu-asian-hulk-tease_ypc9xv.jpg
They’ve replaced the white man “Bruce Banner” with an Asian man who becomes the Hulk.
rs_1024x759-140717041204-1024-captainamerica-samwilson-jc
They made C or D List black superhero, Falcon into the new Captain America, while turning the original white Captain America into a Nazi, a complete bastardisation of his character.
Invincible-Iron-Man-1-Featured
They’ve replaced Iron Man with a black teenage girl.
all_new_wolverine_1
They killed off Wolverine and replaced him with his daughter, X-23.
o-ICEMAN-GAY-facebook
They revealed that perpetual womaniser, Bobby “Ice-Man” Drake, is  actually gay, in the worst way possible.
milesmorales.0
They created a half black, half Latino, Spider-Man, Miles Morales. This one wasn’t so obnoxious, because it was done years before the others, and they didn’t have him replace the original Spider-Man in the process. It’s just seems weird having more than one of them at the same time.

That’s just off the top of my head. These changes have not been well received by long time Marvel fans, and Marvel is aware of this. They try to frame it as if the fans are just a bunch of bigots who can’t accept diversity, but is this really the case? Nobody had any problems with racial minority characters such as Black Panther or Blade, nor did they have any problems with the many female super-heroes that have appeared on teams like the X-Men or the Avengers over the years. Over at their rivals, DC, nobody ever had a problem with Wonder Woman, the black Green Lantern, John Stewart, or the gay super-hero, Midnighter. Diversity was never the problem, because diversity has always existed to some extent in comics. The problem is that they’re replacing beloved and popular characters that fans are emotionally invested in, and then making derogatory comments about the fans when they speak out against it. And sure enough, their sales have declined, and they’re blaming the fans, rather than themselves for this.

With regards to videogames, there’s too much for me to even cover. I’d just suggest reading up on the “Gamergate Controversy”  to get a superficial idea of what’s been happening there. Of course, there’s a lot more to the story than what is being reported there. There’s always the Encylopedia Dramatica article on the topic, if you want to get the other side of the story.

Seeing this infestation of politics, social conflicts, and other problems into what are supposed to be distractions from these issues could have an interesting effect on how people react. The whole reason for bread and circuses is to pacify the masses so that they don’t pay attention to actual problems, and demand real solutions to them. But if these distractions stop working, and people no longer feel that they have a safe haven from these problems, then what are they supposed to do? How can they be kept pacified? Could we perhaps be on the verge of seeing a big awakening soon? I sure hope so.

My thoughts on the Las Vegas attack.

We’re a few days removed from what was apparently the worst mass shooting in American history, beating out the previous record holder from a little under a year and half ago, when Omar Mateen went on a shooting spree in a gay nightclub. The death toll currently stands at 59, with another 500+ injured. At this moment, there’s still very little information about what exactly has happened. We know that the shooter was a white man in his 60s by the name of Stephen Paddock, but we don’t know yet why he did it.

Of course the usual cohort of drooling retards on the internet are chomping at the bit to label him as a “white supremacist terrorist”, simply because he’s a white man who killed a lot of people, and are outraged that he hasn’t been officially declared one… at least not yet. These idiots think that this is an example of a double standard that favour white people, whereby a brown skinned person of the Muslim faith will instantly be labeled as a terrorist for committing an attack, whereas a white man won’t. Of course anyone who has followed this blog will know this is a blatant lie. When the Charlottesville incident happened for example, the media instantly denounced it as an act of white supremacist terrorism, before any facts were established, and demanded that Trump specifically condemn white supremacism, rather than just hatred and violence in general. Compare this to the aftermath of the average Muslim attack, and the instant go to narrative is usually that the attacker was suffering from a “mental illness” (just read any of my previous posts about Islamic attacks and see this for yourself).

No, anyone who actually pays attention to what is really going on, as opposed to making up narratives in their heads, will realise that the media and political establishment will bend over backwards to avoid using the word “terrorist” when a Muslim attacks, but will look for any excuse possible to apply it to “white supremacy” or “right wing extremism”, no matter how poor the supporting evidence is. Inevitably, these narratives always collapse when the facts start coming out, but it sure doesn’t stop them from trying their best.

huffpost
According to this article from the Huffington Post, almost twice as many attacks in America between 2008 and 2016 were from right wing extremists, than from Muslims. Of course what they also forget to mention is that white people make up about 60% of America’s population, whereas Muslims make up about 1%. That means that on a per capita basis, Muslims commit about 30 times as much terrorism in America than white people do. Plus, there’s also this. Don’t trust the media to interpret things accurately.
vox
Vox are quick enough to condemn white extremists too.
chicago.png
And the Chicago Tribune.
intercept.png
And The Intercept.

So I don’t know where this ridiculous narrative that there is an attempt to avoid labeling white attackers as terrorists, came from. I personally think that it’s just a fantasy that idiotic left wing extremists invented in order to maintain their delusions that white people are privileged oppressors and everyone else is an oppressed victim, in the face of facts that debunk this idiocy.

The thing is, terrorism has a very specific definition and while two attacks can look identical of the surface, one might fit this definition perfectly, whereas the other will not. It has nothing to do with the attack itself, but rather the motivation behind it.

terror
“In the pursuit of political aims”

If a Muslim attacker is yelling “ALLAHU AKBAR” or “DEATH TO THE INFIDELS”, then it’s pretty obvious that his motivation for the attack is political, and therefore fits the definition of terrorism. It isn’t considered an act of terrorism just because a Muslim did it. In a situation like this however, we don’t yet know his motivation, so we cannot say for certain that it does fit the definition of terrorism. Maybe it will come out that he had a political motivation and in that case, he absolutely will fit the definition, but until that information is available, we don’t know yet, and cannot definitively say that this was a terrorist attack.

However, the fact that there hasn’t been much of an attempt at all from the media or the authorities, to label this particular attack an example of white terrorism, is indeed quite suspicious to me. Normally it happens immediately, yet here we are days later and there’s nothing. There’s still no explanation for what has happened. This leads me to believe that they might know a lot more than they’re letting on, and are worried about it getting out. ISIS have made the claim that he was a recent Muslim convert, and carried out the attack for them. I’m skeptical that this is true, because ISIS seems to claim responsibility for every attack that happens, but I’m not going to rule out the possibility of it being true, until we get an explanation.

Another theory I’ve heard doing the rounds is that he was a member of Antifa, and specifically chose his target (a country music concert), because based on demographics of the people who like that kind of music, it was mostly going to be attended by white, Republican, Trump supporters, the kind of people that Antifa believe it is perfectly justified to use violence against. Again, there’s no conclusive evidence yet to support this, but much like with the ISIS theory, I’m not going to rule it out as a possibility. Either one of these narratives would be a major setback to the media and political establishment, hence why it wouldn’t surprise me that they could try to cover them up by not releasing any information about the true motivation for the attack at all. I think if he genuinely was a “white supremacist” or a “right wing extremist” that they would have already said so by now. If he wasn’t, then better for them to say nothing and allow people to think for themselves that he was one, than release the truth and reveal that he wasn’t.

Not missing an opportunity to politicise tragedies, the anti-gun crowd have been coming out and demanding more “gun control” in light of what has happened. I’m always suspicious when I see politicians talking about their concern for human life and the wellbeing of their citizens. At the same time that they’re talking about gun control, they’re waging pointless and destructive wars all over the world, and importing millions of violent and incompatible people to live among their citizens, with no regard for the dangers. Their actions suggests that they don’t give a damn about human life at all, and any talk about gun control is due to an ulterior motive.

Who-Do-You-Trust.png
I don’t like going all conspiracy theorist, but I see no evidence to suggest that politicians actually care about human life, and that this is their real motivation for gun control.

Now just to make things clear, I’m no gun fanatic myself, but I would like to address this situation fairly. The general idea being presented is that America’s high levels of gun proliferation is what is causing its high levels of gun violence, and that restricting gun ownership would reduce this significantly. However, I think this is an oversimplification of what’s going on. Switzerland is a country with very liberal gun laws, and they don’t see much gun crime at all. America itself has always had a high level of gun ownership and in decades past, it was so safe, that even schools were able to have gun clubs.

School_679_Baltimore_PattersonHigh_RifleClub_1967
Could you imagine seeing something like this in an American school now?

It’s really only in recent decades that gun violence has gotten out of control in America. Therefore I believe that when you take that into consideration, as well as the situation in countries like Switzerland, that gun violence is a symptom of a problem that has occurred due to changes that have taken place in America the past few decades, rather than the problem itself. Banning guns might in theory make it more difficult for violent, dangerous people, to have access to a means to commit their violent acts, but it won’t get to the root of the problem, which can only be solved by trying to understand what has changed in America between the time when it was perfectly safe for kids to bring guns to school, and now, were there are countless shootings every day, with major incidents such as this latest one in Las Vegas, happening on an all to regular basis. Why is there so much more violence in America these days? That’s the question that needs to be answered.

This story is definitely one that I’ll be keeping an eye on over the next few days. I have a feeling that there’s a lot more to this than we’re hearing about so far. It will definitely be interesting to see what new information will come out, especially when we finally learn what the motive for the attack was. Something tells me that whatever it is, it won’t sit well with the media and political establishment, and the narratives that they would prefer to propagate.

 

 

Germany: Syrian refugee from Ghana rapes woman.

Nature Reserve Rapist May Have Struck Before
“Who would have ever expected this ‘Syrian Child’ would do something like this.”

Guys, you’re not going to believe this, but apparently a woman was raped in Germany recently. Most shocking of all, rather than a native German man being to blame, the suspected rapist is actually  a “refugee” who entered Europe after desperately fleeing for his life from the brutal Syrian civil war, currently destroying his home country of Ghana. This is so shocking because as we all know, men from the third world have the utmost respect for women, and would normally never dream of raping them. This sort of thing has never happened in Germany before. The only explanation that I can think of is some kind of racist conspiracy, motivated by Nazis who have an irrational hatred towards him for the colour of his skin. It’s the only explanation that makes sense to me.

Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.jpg
Our ancestors must be spinning in their graves seeing how much we’ve done to piss away everything they worked hard to give us.

From Metro UK

A failed asylum seeker has called a woman he is alleged to have raped in front of her boyfriend a ‘prostitute’.

“Failed” yet still in the country, roaming free and able to attack people anyway. Why wasn’t he kept in detention as soon as his asylum application failed, in preparation for his deportation? Simple, because Germany, just like every other country in the Western World, is at war with its own people, and don’t care when they’re attacked by monsters like this.

Eric X, from Ghana, was in court on charges of aggravated rape and predatory blackmail.

If only his asylum application had succeeded. He would probably be working hard right now, curing cancer, building time machines, and paying taxes that would go towards the pensions of elderly German retirees. Instead he was rejected by the country he wanted to contribute to so badly, and he had no other choice, but to rape this woman.

It is alleged that he used a tree saw to slash open a tent where the couple were sleeping in a nature reserve near Stuttgart and demanded money shortly after midnight on April 2.

They handed over €6 and a music box before he saw the 23-year-old woman. He shouted at her ‘Come you bitch. I want to fuck you’.

What a charming man.

He then dragged her out of the tent, threatening her with the saw, preventing the boyfriend from being able to help her.

I bet the boyfriend must feel like the most pathetic wimp imaginable, and so he should as well. I can understand that situations like this can be scary, but the fact that he wasn’t even brave enough to try to protect his girlfriend, when he could have easily at the very least attacked him from behind while he was distracted trying to rape her, is just pathetic. They were camping for fuck sake. He could have easily picked up a rock or branch and cracked him over the back of the head with it, even if he was too frightened to attack him head on.

german-soldiers-wehrmacht-nazi-germany-ww2-second-world-war-rare-amazing-pictures-images-photos-009.jpg
Unfortunately, all the real German men died off during WW2.

It is alleged that he then lay a blanket on the floor before raping the woman with the saw close by.

The saw was just “close by” rather than actually in his hands. And the boyfriend meanwhile was sitting nearby, too scared to do try and do anything to stop the attack.

Eric X’s lawyer Martin Moersdorf ordered him to be silent, but he shouted in court: ‘Why should I remain silent, about a case where I don’t know anything about?’

The court heard that CCTV showed he left an asylum shelter, where he has tried to set fire to his cell and has attacked guards, at 7.58pm and did not return until 3.06am.

It’s absolutely incredible really. Why was such a violent creature allowed to roam the streets freely?

He shouted: ‘This is not the truth. This is a trick of the court. A trick question.’

When DNA evidence found on the victim was presented to the court, again he shouted: ‘If the girl claims she has been raped, she must be a prostitute. All who help her in the lie are filthy people.’

Merkel’s policies are responsible for bringing animals like this into Europe, and yet she won another election anyway. This is why I have lost all faith in the world.

Lawyer Gudrun Roth, who represents the 23-year-old student, said that it is ‘always a slap in the face, if someone who has experienced such a thing is mocked even further.’

Both of the victims are currently receiving psychological care.

Eric X arrived in Europe after crossing the Mediterranean Libya. Before he arrived in Germany, he stayed in the Italian capital of Rome and the city of Salzburg in Austria.

He escaped the brutal civil war in Ghana. Then he escaped the brutal civil war in Libya. Then the brutal civil war in Italy. Then the brutal civil war in Austria. Finally, he arrived in Germany, the first country with adequate welfare safety levels, only to have his asylum request rejected. He’s the real victim here.

A few years before moving to Europe, he claims that he killed his brother-in-law in a dispute about the inheritance of a family member in Ghana.

This, combined with his lack of education and dire future prospects, are the main reasons why he chose to migrate to Europe in 2014, according to the psychiatric report.

So when you you read a story like this, what do you suppose is the lesson we’re supposed to learn from it?

A) That Europe is committing suicide via mass third world migration and needs to start closing its borders, before it’s too late.

B) That we need to accept even more asylum applications, no matter how frivolous, in order to prevent rejected asylum seekers from taking revenge.

C) We need to to make more German women aware of the existence of temporary tattoos of the word “No”.

D) Story? Lesson? What story? What lesson? I have no idea what you’re talking about you terrible racist you. I’m too busy reading up on important issues, such as the latest gossip about the Kardashian/Jenner family, to care about meaningless stuff like that.

If you answered “D”, then good job. You’ve earned a gold star. If you answered “B” or “C” then you’re on the right track. You don’t earn a gold star this time, seeing as you’re still paying too much attention to things, but keep up the good work, and you’ll get there eventually. If you answered “A”, then I’m sorry, that’s incorrect. Please report to the Ministry of Love, Room 101, so that we can help cleanse you of that “wrongthink”.

9d14ca75dbcb04895e63ab44345b7e89

 

A Tale of Two Cities.

20156130_451685491868629_4874733659127867774_n

Wow we had a pretty quiet few weeks there for a while. I was starting to think that integration efforts had finally succeeded, and that terrorism would now be a thing of the past. Well actually no, I didn’t really think that at all, because I’m not a naive idiot with a complete inability to understand the relationship between cause and effect. The only thing that surprises me is how long it has been since anything notable has happened. Must be a good three weeks or so. I guess that’s why we had to get three incidents in a single day. Got to make up for lost time and try to maintain the average of one per week.

yZHhon
Something tells me that the tree has grown a lot bigger in the time since this photo was taken.

From Evening Standard

Police have launched a terrorism investigation after an explosion on a Tube train at Parsons Green station on Friday morning.

The blast sent a “shot of flames” through the packed rush hour train, injuring 29 people.

Commuters described mass panic as people fled from the train and platform out of the south west London station.

Here is everything we know about what happened so far:

  • The blast happened at 8.20am on Friday on a train at Parsons Green station, on the District line route between Earl’s Court and Wimbledon in south west London.
  • Witnesses said the Tube train had pulled into the station and the doors had just opened when the explosion went off in the last carriage. Passengers described a “heat wave” and “wall of flame”which was sent through the carriage.
  • The British Transport Police, Met armed police and officers, firefighters and paramedics from the London Ambulance Service attended. Six London Fire Brigade crews and 50 firefighters were sent to the scene within three minutes. The first ambulance crew arrived within five minutes.
  • Around two hours after the suspected attack, Scotland Yard declared it a terrorist incident. A counter-terror investigation was launched.
  • The Met confirmed the blast was an “improvised explosive device” which had been detonated. Photos on social media show what appears to be a bucket, wrapped in a Lidl carrier bag, with wires protruding from it.
  • 29 people in total were injured. Nineteen people were taken to hospital by paramedics and the others arrived at hospital themselves. Eight people were discharged from hospital at around 4.30pm.
  • Police said most of the injuries are believed to be flash burns. None of those injured are thought to be in a serious or life-threatening condition. The injured are in hospitals across London including Imperial, Chelsea and Westminster, Guy’s and St Thomas’ and a Parsons Green urgent care centre.
  • Officers said they are working with intelligence agency MI5.
  • The suspect believed to be behind the blast has not yet been found and no arrests have been made.
  • The District line was suspended between Wimbledon and Edgware Road.
  • Prime Minister Theresa May is to chair an emergency Cobra meeting later on Friday. She said: “My thoughts are with those injured at Parsons Green and the emergency services who, once again, are responding swiftly and bravely to a suspected terrorist incident.”
  • Firefighters also helped evacuate 253 people from a train which was not involved in the explosion, but which had been stopped on tracks nearby.
  • The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, will also join intelligence and security officials for the Cobra meeting. In a statement he said: “Our city utterly condemns the hideous individuals who attempt to use terror to harm us and destroy our way of life. As London has proven again and again, we will never be intimidated or defeated by terrorism.
  • The Met Police and Theresa May has responded to a tweet by President Donald Trump, rebuking his speculation. The US leader said: “Another attack in London by a loser terrorist. These are sick and demented people who were in the sights of Scotland Yard.” The PM said: “I never think it’s helpful for anybody to speculate on what is an ongoing investigation.” The Met said his comments were “unhelpful” and “pure speculation”.
  • The public has been warned to expect an “enhanced police presence” on Friday.
  • Police have cordoned off and evacuated an area of 50 metres in radius around Parsons Green station, including residents’ homes while officers secure the DIY explosive device.
  • Anyone with any information is asked to call detectives on the hotline 0800 789 321. Anyone with any pictures from the scene is urged to send them to www.ukpoliceimageappeal.co.uk.

Something tells me that we won’t be seeing London’s Muslim Mayor, Sadiq Khan being hounded by the media to condemn this act of violence, in the same way that Trump was hounded by the media to condemn the violent “white supremacists” of Charlottesville. Yes, I’m aware that he apparently has condemned it, but sure Trump condemned what happened in Charlottesville too, and it still didn’t stop him getting hounded.

Oh btw, that Charlottesville narrative is collapsing too. The “white supremacist terrorist” didn’t even hit the woman he supposedly killed. She apparently died of a heart attack.

obesity
Not even in the car’s path. Instead, she was knocked to the ground by people in the crowd.

Anyway, while London was having its own case of “cultural enrichment”, Paris didn’t want to feel left out, and ended up having not one, but two of its own. Those wacky French people. Always having to show us who the real champs are in terms of sheer number of terrorist incidents.

that-feeling-when-you-cant-surrender-to-terrorists-france-sad-frog

From Independent (UK)

A man has been arrested after attacking a soldier on patrol in Paris.

The soldier was attacked from behind by a man wielding a knife at about 6.30am. The man was also reported to have referenced Isis during the assault in a major subway interchange.

The incident, in which the soldier in question was not injured, was the latest of several attacks on troops deployed in large numbers to patrol sensitive places in France after a series of attacks by Islamist militants that have killed more than 230 people in France in the past three years.

The latest incident was confirmed by armed forces minister Florence Parly in an interview on Europe 1 radio.

The man is not thought to have been known to police, according to French media.

Police spokeswoman Johana Primevert said the incident took place in the Chatelet station in central Paris. Traffic and access to the station, which serves multiple subway and commuter train lines, quick resumed.

Thousands of troops and police officers are deployed in France’s Operation Sentinelle, launched after the January 2015 terror attacks.

The attack came the day after the government announced changes to the force, with a greater focus on temporary and seasonal events. The soldiers still will patrol around major tourist sites, places of worship, train stations and airports. 

Now it’s one thing when it’s a soldier who gets attacked. The idiots who defend this insanity can at least attempt to justify it in their own minds by claiming that it was a response to French military aggression in the Muslim world… or something to that effect. But how can they possibly justify something like this?

From BBC

A man is on the run after injuring two women with a hammer in Chalon-sur-Saône, in eastern France.

The women were allegedly assaulted, about 15 minutes apart, by a man just before midday on Friday.

Witnesses said the suspect shouted “Allahu Akbar” (“God is greatest” in Arabic) during the attacks.

French prosecutors say they are treating the incident as a possible terror attack, but did not rule out other motives.

The women’s injuries are not life-threatening, and local media report that they have already been released from hospital.

Officials asked locals not to share information on social media about the location of police while the manhunt for the attacker was still under way.

Earlier on Friday a man was arrested at Châtelet metro station in Paris after reportedly attacking a soldier with a knife at 06:30 (04:30 GMT).

It was the latest in a string of assaults against French troops, who have been deployed across the country in response to recent terror attacks.

The soldier was not injured in the incident.

All I can say is that luckily enough, nobody seems to have been killed in any of these latest attacks. But how long will that luck hold out? As I’ve said time and time again, this is never going to just suddenly stop. It’s just going to keep happening and becoming more frequent, until one of two things happen:

  1. Europeans surrender and submit to the will of Islam.
  2. Europeans rise up and demand the removal of Islam from its borders, much like our ancestors spent over 1300 years doing.

There is no third option.

14729134_996801527096399_5204197857503177913_n
Unfortunately I’m still not optimistic that we’re any closer to option two being accepted yet.

My thoughts on the recent George Hook controversy.

I want to compare two different scenarios. In scenario one, I lock up my home when I have to leave. When I return, I find out that someone has broken in and stolen my TV, PC, games consoles, and various other expensive pieces of property. In scenario two, I leave my front door wide open when I leave, and when I return, I find that a similar burglary has taken place. In neither situation is it justified that my property has been stolen, but in scenario two, I’m more likely to receive some criticism from others for not taking the precaution of locking my door, than I would in scenario one, were I did take precautions, but something bad happened anyway. The story behind scenario two could then potentially be used as a warning to others to take the kind of necessary precautions that I should have taken myself. This isn’t being done to shame me, or to “blame the victim”. It’s being done to hopefully prevent other people from experiencing something similar themselves, by informing them of the potential consequences of not taking the right precautions.

Lets give another example of these kinds of scenarios. In scenario one, I’m walking home at night and there are two routes home. One is a long walk around the block, and the other is a shortcut through a dark alley. Concerned for my safety, I choose the long route, but I end up getting attacked and mugged anyway. In scenario two, I choose to walk down the dark alley instead, holding a wad of cash in my hand while doing so, and the same thing happens. Once again, in neither situation is it justified that I was attacked and mugged, but in scenario two, it’s more likely that I’ll receive some criticism for being irresponsible, and my story could be used as a warning to others: “Don’t walk down a dark alley alone at night, with your money out. Keep your money hidden, and try to stay in well lit and open areas.” Once again, this isn’t being done to shame or “victim blame” me. It’s being done to prevent others from getting into a similar situation themselves by warning them of the potential dangers of doing what I did.

So now that that’s out of the way, let me get to the main point of this post. A few days ago, Irish radio host George Hook created a massive controversy when discussing a recent case in the UK, in which a 19 year old girl was allegedly raped. The girl in question, met a man at a bar, went off with him to have consensual sex, and claims that she was soon after, raped by one of his friends. Hook made it clear that the rapist is a scumbag, and he condemned his actions fully. However, he did also make a point of raising the issue of the girl’s own behaviour. To quote what he said:

“She was passed around went the story apparently. She went to bed with one guy and he went out and another guy comes in. She doesn’t want to have relations with the second guy but he forced himself upon her. Awful,

But when you then look deeper into the story you have to ask certain questions. Why does a girl who just meets a fella in a bar go back to a hotel room? She’s only just barely met him. She has no idea of his health conditions, she has no idea who he is, no idea what dangers he might pose.

But modern day social activity means that she goes back with him. Then is surprised when somebody else comes into the room and rapes her. Should she be raped? Course she shouldn’t. Is she entitled to say no? Absolutely. Is the guy who came in a scumbag? Certainly. Should he go to jail? Of Course. All of those things.

But is there no blame now to the person who puts themselves in danger? You then of course read that she passed out on the toilet and when she woke up the guy was trying to rape her. There is personal responsibility because it’s your daughter and my daughter. What determines the daughter who goes out, gets drunk, passes out and has strangers in her room or the daughter that stays out, stays halfway sober and comes home, I don’t know. I wish I knew what the secret of parenting is.

Is a point of responsibility the real issue?

There is a point of responsibility that young girls are taking for their own safety,”

Now I specifically bolded the parts where he condemns what happened, but none of this matters. What people are focusing on instead are the bits where he talks about personal responsibility. You see in an ideal world, there wouldn’t be any rapists, women wouldn’t have to ever feel unsafe, and there would be no need for taking any precautions, just like how in an ideal world, I should be able to leave my doors unlocked without getting burgled, or walk down a dark alley with a wad of cash in my hand, without getting mugged.

Unfortunately, we don’t live in an ideal world. We live in a world with bad people, who do bad things. People are getting outraged at Hook, claiming that he’s victim blaming, and trying to tell young women what they can and cannot do. That’s not the impression that I get at all. I don’t think anyone is telling young women that they don’t have the right to get stupidly drunk, and go off with a stranger they’ve just met and know nothing about for sex. What he’s saying is that there are predators out there who will victimise vulnerable people if they get an opportunity to do so, and is trying to warn other young women to look after themselves so that they don’t end up becoming their victims. He just articulated in a very poor manner.

I’ve come across numerous quotes online from people suggesting that instead of teaching young women to take responsibility for their own safety, we should “teach men not to rape”. The fact is, men already know not to rape. Rapists don’t rape people out of ignorance that’s it wrong. They do it because they’re bad people, who simply don’t care. By the same logic, we may as well be saying that we should teach people not to murder or steal, in the ridiculous belief that when potential murderers and thieves find out that murder and stealing are wrong, they won’t do it anymore.

No, what I believe is that we should be teaching people about the very real risks and dangers that are out there, as a warning, rather than living in a fantasy world were people are free to do whatever they want, without any potential consequences. If a woman decides that she still wants to get extremely drunk and go off with a man that she just met, after being informed of the risks involved, then that should entirely be her right, and nobody should tell her otherwise. But lets not pretend that declaring something to be a “right” means that any dangers associated with it, suddenly stop existing.

5 year old girl forced to live with foster Muslim family.

All across the Western world, governments are at war with the ordinary people. Don’t be fooled into thinking that their disastrous and destructive decisions are the result of stupidity, cowardice in the face of political correctness, naive optimism, or whatever. Nobody is this incompetent for real. Nobody with even the slightest understanding of cause and effect would be making these insane decisions, with the expectation that they’ll actually work out well. No, what we are seeing is a deliberate and conscious decision to ruin the lives of the people that they are supposed to represent and protect. It is important that we all remember this fact, for if things ever start turning around, and they try to pretend that they always meant well. They’ll need to answer for their crimes against us.

319173

From Metro UK

A five-year-old Christian girl placed in foster care with a Muslim family has been ordered to go and live with her relatives.

Why was she not allowed to live with her relatives in the first place? Surely that would be the logical thing to do, if they really cared about the wellbeing of the child. Of course, we know damn well that they don’t care about the wellbeing of little white English girls at all. They’ve allowed untold thousands of them to be raped by Muslim men, and then they deliberately forced this child to live with a Muslim family, putting her at similar risk, rather than doing the sane thing and letting her live with relatives. Remember what I said already. Nobody is this incompetent. Any idiot would know that it would be better for a child to live with relatives if for whatever reason, they can’t live with their immediate family. This was deliberate.

Gra
This girl was put at risk of experiencing something similar herself.

The move follows reports that the young girl was being encouraged to speak Arabic in a foster family where English is rarely spoken.

Why are these people even in Britain? They’re not integrating. They choose their own language and culture over that of the country they immigrated to. How does Britain benefit from their presence?

The girl, whose identity is being protected, was reportedly taken to back to her grandmother’s after a judge ruled she should stop living with her current foster family.

Should have been brought to her grandmother’s in the first place.

According to The Times, the girl was being encouraged to abandon Christian traditions and values in favour of Muslim ones.

And of course we know that if the reverse happened, that being, if a Christian family tried to force convert a Muslim child, there would be outrage.

Tower Hamlets Council, the authority responsible for handling the girl’s foster care, denied that the family did not speak English.

A council spokesman said she had been placed in an ‘English-speaking family of mixed race’ and that there ‘inaccuracies’ in reports published.

Yes and we can trust the word of the British authorites. It’s not as if they ever lie at all, or ignore the wellbeing of children when it comes to dealing with the Muslim community. Well except for all the times when they do exactly that, of course.

Untitled.png

Social services bosses at the council said staff have ‘always been working towards the child being looked after by a family member’.

Why does this even take any effort at all? Surely it’s just common sense that a child is in better hands with their own family, and this should be the default, rather than something to work towards. There’s no logical reason to hand a child over to a family of strangers, especially one of a vastly different cultural and racial background, unless the real aim was for the child to suffer.

‘We would like to give more details but we are legally restricted to do so,’ a council spokesman said in a statement.

“There are powerful people who don’t want us exposing the truth. Go back to your alcohol, your premier league football, and your Kardashians. You can trust us to make the important decisions, while you distract yourselves.”

‘Tower Hamlets Council has the welfare of children at the heart of what we do.

LOL!!!

The decision to choose foster carers for a child is based on a number of factors including cultural background and proximity to promote contact with the child’s family and the child’s school in order to give them as much stability as possible.

“Cultural background is one of the factors we take into account.”

*Proceeds to send child to a family with a completely different cultural background.*

‘We have always been working towards the child being looked after by a family member and we continue to do so.’

Again let me ask, why is this something to “work towards”? Why isn’t it the default?

A spokesman for the Judicial Office said Judge Khatun Sapnara had re-examined the case at a family court hearing on Tuesday and decided she should live with her grandmother.

Too little, too late. The poor child has already suffered unnecessarily.

f8078ce470c623df7070dbd1f35e2d4bda2b76ff
Looks like this meme will need to be updated. If this story is anything to go by, we’re now seeing the early stages of them meeting criteria (E) as well. That just leave criteria (A) to be met.

Three violent incidents in a two day period.

20156130_451685491868629_4874733659127867774_n
*sigh*, will the counter ever stop being reset?

So we’re all well aware of what happened in Spain, but apparently Spain wasn’t the only European country to be “culturally enriched” lately. I would just like to offer my heartfelt condolences to *checks sheet of paper*.. ah yes, Helsinki and Berlin. Much like what happened the night before in *checks sheet again*… Barcelona, yes, these are terrible tragedies, but we must not allow them to change how we think. Diversity is our greatest strength afterall, and attacks like these must not divide us. Our diversity is what unifies us. Yes, division equals unity. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

From Times of India

HELSINKI/BERLIN: In two separate incidents of stabbings on Friday, two people were killed and six injured in the Finnish city of Turku, while another man was hacked to death in the western German city of Wuppertal.

The Finnish Police shot one suspect in the legs and arrested him. Security forces wrote on Twitter that police were “looking for other possible perpetrators”.

One killed in stabbing in western Germany, attacker on the run

Police confirmed that one man was stabbed to death and another injured in Wuppertal, adding that the attacker was still on the loose.

Police in Germany said they were hunting for one or more assailants, but could not immediately provide more information about the circumstances of the attack

The stabbing happened at around 1245 GMT in the city’s Elberfeld area.

Both the incidents come a day after 14 people were killed in twin terror attacks in Spain.

You know, I haven’t been posting a whole lot recently, because as I mentioned, I’m somewhat burned out on everything that has been happening. I know that there were a couple of incidents in France recently for example, that I didn’t even bother writing about. The fact is, these sorts of incidents are nothing unusual anymore. They happen on a damn near weekly basis at this point, and if you add in all the other types of “enrichment”, such as acid attacks, rapes, Muslim grooming gangs etc, you’re pretty much seeing multiple events taking place all over Europe every single day. It’s impossible to discuss them all, let alone think of anything original to say about them each time.

However, these three separate attacks all followed closely on the heels of the incident in Charlottesville, when a quote, unquote, “white supremacist”, plowed his car into a crowd of “peaceful counter-protesters”, killing one in the process. I think it makes an interesting comparison to see the reaction in the mainstream media and on social media to the Charlottesville incident, and then to compare it to the reaction to the typical Islamic terror attacks, like the three most recent ones.

First of all, lets just give a little background context as to what was actually going on in Charlottesville. In the past few years in America, there has been this obsession on the far left, with tearing down monuments and symbols associated with the Confederacy, because they consider these monuments to be a glorification of slavery, and therefore consider them to be “racist” and “oppressive”.

george-orwell-1984-every-record-has-been-destroyed-or-falsified-25408969.pngHowever, there are a lot of other people who don’t consider these monuments offensive, but rather consider them a part of their heritage, and are against their removal. People like this are worried about a possible slippery slope occurring. If these monuments are offensive because of their association with slavery, then what’s to stop people from later finding other icons of American history offensive? Afterall, George Washington himself was a slave owner, so whose to say that these unhinged lunatics won’t eventually be calling for Mount Rushmore to be blown up, and for everything named after Washington, including their capital city no less, to be renamed to something “less offensive” and “more inclusive”? Indeed, as this video from Mark Dice shows, some already are making these demands.

So people who actually take pride in their history and their heritage, and who have realised from experience that these hate-filled lunatics will never be satisfied and will only keep pushing for more, had decided that enough was enough, and that they were going to protest against the planned removal of these monuments. So they organised a march to protest this and even went through the proper channels and obtained a permit. However, the city attempted to revoke this permit. This decision was appealed and a federal judge ruled that revoking the permit would be a violation of the protesters first amendment rights, thus over-ruling the decision of the city’s officials.

So many different groups of people, with many different agendas, united by their common interest in preserving the monuments, turned up to this protest. This did indeed include legitimate white supremacists, KKK, and Neo-Nazi types, but with the way American law works, there’s nothing illegal about having any particular political ideology, no matter how offensive it might be. As long as these groups protested peacefully, there was nothing that could be done to them. Many of them did turn up to the protest armed however, and detractors are citing this as “proof” that violence was their goal all along. However, I don’t believe this was the case at all.

Whenever any groups of white people turn up to protest in favour of their group interests, or attend speeches by people who campaign for them, these events are always attended by Antifa and other groups, who have the intended goal of shutting them down, usually employing extreme violence to do so. Indeed, I’ve discussed this sort of thing before, when the gay, half-Jew, black cock obsessed Milo (whose also apparently a Neo-Nazi, white supremacist), was giving a speech in Berkeley, and Antifa rioted against the event. So knowing that violent Antifa thugs were guaranteed to show up and engage in violence as they normally do, does it not make sense to arm yourselves in anticipation? The weapons weren’t brought in order to start trouble. They were brought as a defensive measure, in preparation for when Antifa did.

TRUMP_INAUGURATION_DCJM135-2017JAN20_022721_165.jpg
They do this every single time.

So sure enough, Antifa and other violent leftist groups showed up to the event as counter-protesters. Then the police, most likely under the orders of city officials themselves, made the whole situation worse. As I already mentioned, the city had attempted to revoke the protester’s permits, but was over-ruled by a federal judge. However, even though the federal judge ruled that they were allowed to protest, the police decided half way through that the march was “unlawful” and ordered the protesters to disperse. I’ve even heard it suggested that after ordering them to disperse, that the police deliberately herded the protesters right towards the counter-protesters, were they were free to take cheap shots at them with baseball bats as they walked by. Indeed, video footage seems to confirm this.

Go to roughly 51:44 to see the protesters being marched out single file by the police, past the counter-protesters, and watch as the counter-protesters start throwing things at them and hitting them with bats.

So eventually the violence gets to a point were one of the alt-right guys plows through a crowd in his car, injuring many and killing one of them. As soon as this happened, the media leapt on it and started declaring it a “terrorist attack” immediately. However, can we really be certain that this was the case? Terrorism has a very specific definition. It’s about using violence and intimidation in order to pursue an ideological objective. When a Muslim runs over a crowd of people, yelling “Allahu Akbar” while doing so, it’s obvious that his motivation is ideologically based, and therefore fits the definition of terrorism.

1465842213289
Well, it’s obvious to most people.

The problem is, we can’t be certain that this guy ran over the crowd for ideological reasons, at least not until it is properly investigated. With all the violence and chaos going on, he may simply have done so in a panic, trying to escape from it. Alternatively, maybe he did do it on purpose, but it could have been as a result of road rage, due to the anger he felt from having his car attacked by the counter-protesters. Or maybe it is a genuine terrorist attack and he did so in support of the ideology of white supremacy. The point is, we don’t know yet if it does fit the definition of terrorism, but the media doesn’t care, because they are determined to promote their narrative that “white supremacists” are the most dangerous group of terrorists of all, and in order to do that, they need to have a few examples of white supremacist terrorists.

anders-breivik.jpg
Anders Breivik was a pretty long time ago by now. They need some fresher examples of white supremacist terrorists that they can cite.

So Trump comes out and condemns the violence and hatred on both sides, and the media goes into hysteria, because he doesn’t condemn “white supremacists” specifically. As far as the media is concerned, condemning both sides equally, when both sides were engaged in violence (and the other side were the ones who started it no less), is the same thing to them as if he had condoned the white supremacists.

So eventually he does come out and condemn white supremacists specifically, and the media still isn’t satisfied, because he didn’t do it quickly enough, or with enough enthusiasm for their liking. This of course is nothing new. Back during the election campaign, they made a big deal about white supremacists endorsing him, and his apparent “refusal to disavow them”, even though he disavowed them constantly.

So lets look at a few of the double standards we’re seeing on display here.

  • Muslims constantly commit terrorist acts in white majority countries. The media tries to downplay them as being due to “mental illness” on the part of the attackers. White guy who may or may not be a white supremacist (for all we know, he’s just someone who wants to preserve the statues), runs over a crowd one time. Media instantly claims that it was an act of terrorism, before the facts are even established.
  • Whenever a Muslim terrorist attack happens, the narrative is always that it’s just a tiny minority who do it, and that it doesn’t reflect Islam as a whole. The media calls for tolerance and understanding towards Muslims, and condemns anyone who speaks out as a “racist” or an “Islamophobe”. White people stand up for their own group interests, peacefully 99% of the time. The 1% of the time were violence does happen and the media condemns every single person with any belief in pursuing white interests, and tars them all with the slurs of “white supremacist” or “Neo-Nazi”, and demands action be taken against them.
  • Antifa and Black Lives Matter, constantly riot and violently attack people, whose political opinions they disagree with. Media downplays them as being “peaceful protests”, and any violence is from a “small minority, which doesn’t represent the movement as a whole”. White nationalists attempt to have a genuinely peaceful protest, get attacked by Antifa, and then fight back to defend themselves from this violence. They’re all violent thugs, and every member of the movement is bad. There are no good people pursuing white interests. They’re all white supremacists, and they’re all automatically violent, just because of their beliefs, even if they don’t commit any actual acts of violence.
  • Hillary/Obama/Bernie Sanders supporters, make up the ranks of Antifa and BLM, and are constantly involved in violence. The media doesn’t demand that anyone of them disavow the support of these groups. Meanwhile the media constantly demands that Trump disavows the support of “white supremacists” (ie, anyone who believes that white people have a right to pursue their own political interests), and as the video above shows, they don’t even listen to him when he does disavow their support anyway.

When you look at the reaction to what happened in Charlottesville, you would think the world itself was ending, and that this is one of the worst things to ever happen. Yet, we’ve seen months of violent riots from Antifa groups, months of violent riots from Black Lives Matter groups, and countless examples of Muslim terrorist attacks, including at least three in the past two days alone, and none of it ever generates even a fraction of the outrage that this Charlottesville incident has. This suggests that Charlottesville specifically holds special significance to the media, and the only logical explanation, is that the reason why it holds special significance, is because of the groups involved.

What people need to understand, is that none of this is an accident, nor is it a case that the media is simply too “politically correct” and cowardly, to address these issues honestly. No, this is completely deliberate and malicious in its intent. The mainstream media in the Western world, does not exist for the purpose of keeping the population informed about what is actually going on. In fact, it exists for the exact opposite purpose.

In reality, our civilisations have been infiltrated by an enemy that wants to exterminate and replace us all. In order to ensure this extermination occurs, it needs to keep us misinformed and asleep to what is actually happening. As long as we’re unaware, we can’t resist. When Muslim terrorists are constantly killing us, it runs the risk of waking us up, so they deliberately try to downplay what is happening, so that we don’t rise up and demand their removal. When white people protest in favour of our group interests, they deliberately send groups like Antifa and BLM to violently shut us down, and then use their control of the supply of information, to pretend that these Antifa and BLM types are peaceful protesters, rather than the vicious thugs that they really are. When white people come together simply to stand up for our own group interests, against the Muslims who are killing us, or the perpetually offended special snowflakes who want to strip us of our history, they create blatantly false narratives about us, claiming that we’re the violent ones, or that we’re the supremacists, simply for defending ourselves. When we elect a leader who campaigns on representing our interests, and actually tries to do what we want, they use their control of the media to constantly attack him, to destroy his reputation, and to pressure him into disavowing us, in the hopes of creating a divide between him and his base of support.

None of this is an accident. Just think about it honestly. Do you really honestly believe that they could be reporting so much wrong, just by mistake, or that it’s just a coincidence that they always just happen to condemn the right-wing white groups, and defend the non-white and the left-wing groups, no matter which side is the one who is actually in the wrong? No, it’s not a coincidence. It’s done on purpose, because the media is nothing more than a propaganda tool that is under the control of a small and hostile minority, that is at war with the ordinary citizens of their countries.

Now, if only we knew just who that enemy could be.

HanAssholeSolo-meme-768x1177

hollywood-jews

jew-media-masters-2

media-controlled-zionist-jews

Times-of-Israel-jews-media

7thu8qw

1392122783353.jpg

 

Another week, another case of cultural enrichment in Paris.

20156130_451685491868629_4874733659127867774_n.jpg
The counter has clearly seen better days.

I haven’t been posting a whole lot recently because I’ve been feeling somewhat burned out from the daily grind of being awake to the sheer insanity that the Western world is living under these days. Sooner or later, it takes its toll on you, and you just need to take a break. Because of this, I have actually missed out on writing about several attacks that have taken place in various European countries the past few weeks. Really, what can I say that I haven’t already said several times already? The formula for when these attacks happen is so predictable at this point, that there’s really not much new that I can say. It always goes something like this:

  • A report comes out of a bombing/mass stabbing/vehicular attack, in some random European city.
  • Details about the suspect are kept as vague as possible (unless it’s one of the rare cases were it’s a white guy, in which case, details are reported immediately).
  • Occasionally, it is reported that the suspect yelled “ALLAHU AKBAR” before attacking. Motivation for attack is apparently “unclear”
allahu-akbar-clearly-this-sad-green-motives-are-frog-signifies-18047688.png
Just in case you’ve forgotten…
  • Comment sections on articles about the attack devolve into arguments between “racists” who predict that it was a Muslim, and people who are more concerned about condemning these “racist” comments, than about the attack itself.
  • Eventually, it is revealed that it was indeed a Muslim. Media claim that the attacker was suffering from “mental illness”, just like every other attacker who coincidentally, attacks in the name of Islam.

1465842213289.png

  • Media starts talking about how “right wing extremists” (who almost never kill anyone) are the real threat, and that normal Muslims are the real victims, because people are saying mean things about their religious beliefs, and this is apparently much more damaging than being killed.
  • Nobody learns their lesson, and people continue on like normal, until the next attack happens, at which point, the cycle repeats itself.

Anyway, I wanted to draw attention to the fact that France has experienced yet another attack today, not because there’s anything original or noteworthy about it, but because it happened shortly after a new law came into place in France recently. This law prevents people convicted of actions related to any form of discrimination, including racism, from running for political office in the country.

The problem is that as we all know, the bar for what is actually considered “racism” in most European countries, is pretty low, so low in fact, that often just speaking out about what is happening, can be considered racist. So in other words, if a person actually speaks out about what is happening and wishes to run for political office and implement changes to stop it from continuing, they run the risk of being banned from even doing so. This is a complete violation of democracy, and pretty much makes it impossible anymore for France to even save itself through democratic means. It makes it so that the people will no longer have anyone to choose from, if they want a candidate who will deal with the mass immigration and terrorism that is plaguing their country.

161114152205-marine-le-pen-france-flag-super-tease.jpg
You should have voted for Le Pen when you had the chance to, France.

This shows the desperation of our enemies. They can see that the people are waking up to what they’re doing, and now in their panic to shut us down, their masks have slipped, and they’re showing their true colours. They want nothing less than our complete extermination, and they’ll do whatever it takes to prevent us from stopping it. The problem is, that as JFK himself once said:

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

France had a violent revolution before, when the people were pushed too far. With democratic options being taken off the table, they might eventually feel as if they have no other choice, but to do it again…

guillotine.jpg
Possibly coming soon…

 

“Preschools are too ‘heteronormative'”

I was always under the impression that the purpose of preschools, was to teach children how to socialise and interact with other children. Turns out I was wrong. The real purpose of them is to be a sort of “reverse conversion therapy”, where heterosexual kids are brainwashed into becoming LGBT.

From Campus Reform

A University of Michigan instructor recently claimed that preschool classrooms are rife with “heteronormativity” that perpetuates “inequalities related to gender.”

Now just watch as she fails to back this up with any actual meaningful points, instead just relying on buzzwords and personal opinions.

Heidi M. Gansen, a Ph.D. student who teaches sociology at UMich, advanced these claims in a July 14 article that examines the prevalence of “heteronormativity” in a set of nine Michigan preschool classrooms she visited.

And this is why the value of a college education keeps on declining. The fact that a deranged Marxist ideologue like this woman is actually paid to teach people, is absolutely hilarious. Or at least, it would be hilarious, if it wasn’t so tragic. To any unfortunate student who was naive enough to sign up for this class, I just want to wish you good luck trying to pay off your tens of thousands of dollars of student loan debt, especially while working at the one job you’re likely to get, with a qualification such as this.

ly.jpg
“Do you want fries with that?”

Defining “heteronormativity” as a culture in which “heterosexuality is always assumed, expected, ordinary, and privileged,” Gansen then argues that the issue is especially important to her research because preschools contribute to the “reproduction of inequalities pertaining to gender and sexuality,” such as gender roles and gendered feelings.

Does all that sound like a bunch of nonsensical, confusing, gibberish to you? If so, then good, that’s exactly the point. It’s supposed to be confusing for the average person to comprehend what this all even means. Basically, this woman is complaining that heterosexuality is presumed to be the “norm” in society, just because the vast majority of people, happen to be heterosexual. Because most people happen to be heterosexual, most other people will naturally presume that others are heterosexual, because statistically speaking, about 96% of people, will be, unless they’re specifically told otherwise. However, she seems to think that this way of interacting with one another marginalises the remaining 4% who aren’t, and therefore, we need to change our natural behaviour, and act as if there’s a 50/50 split between gay and straight people.

“Preschool is a good place to begin this examination, because practices that facilitate heteronormativity in classrooms become more engrained in later years of schooling,” she explains.

It’s a good place to begin the examination, because the best way to brainwash people into accepting your deranged world view, is to target them when they’re young, and their brains aren’t fully developed yet. That’s what it’s really all about. She wants to perpetuate her Cultural Marxist bollocksology, and who better to promote it to than young kids who haven’t yet developed the ability to think critically?

He-Alone-Who-Owns-The-Youth-Gains-The-Future-Adolf-Hitler.jpg

Accordingly, Gansen spent ten months observing childhood behavior at a set of nine Michigan preschools, finding numerous ways in which heterosexuality is “produced” and “enforced” by students and teachers.

Wait, I’m confused. Heterosexuality is “produced” now? But I was under the impression that one of the leading arguments of the LGBT rights lobby, was that you’re “born with your sexuality”, and that you can’t choose or change it. So I don’t understand how she can then make the claim that these teachers are “producing heterosexuality”.

In all seriousness, I’m of the believe that sexuality is determined by a mixture of nurture and nature, rather than just one or the other. I’ve heard it suggested before that both homosexuality and transgenderism is similar to diabetes, in that there’s a “Type 1” and a “Type 2”.

injection_2227502b.jpg
No don’t worry, I’m not suggesting that we can start injecting gay people with insulin, in order to make them straight.

Much like with diabetes, someone with type 1 homosexuality or transgenderism, will be someone who was just born that way. I do believe that there are people who are just naturally born to be gay or transgender, and nothing in the environment will change that. However, just like how people get type 2 diabetes, due to their life experiences, I believe that life experiences in the time before puberty (and by extension, before sexuality has developed) can impact how a person’s sexuality develops. Just look at this study for example:

“Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. “

Look at the variance there. 46% of gay men interviewed for the study, claimed to experience homosexual molestation as a child, compared to just 7% of straight men, and there’s a similar variance between the experiences of lesbians and straight women. When looking at information like that, is it really hard to consider the possibility that having such experiences before they reached adolescence, and while their brains were still developing, could have warped their perceptions of sexuality somewhat. As I’ve said, I’m by no means suggesting that every single gay person is someone who was “turned gay from molestation” as a child, as I do believe that plenty of gay people are just born that way, but it’s still something that needs to be acknowledged.

And as for transgenderism, well consider this. In the most gender equal country on the planet, Sweden, the number of children looking to undergo sex changes is apparently doubling each year.  Supporters will claim the numbers actually aren’t any higher than they ever were before, but it’s just less taboo now to go public about it, but I’m too cynical to agree. Personally, I believe that there has always existed a very tiny minority of people with gender dysphoria (the type 1s), but what we’re now seeing is a drastic increase in the type 2s, as a result of campaigns to normalise and encourage it. The fact that a country like Sweden of all places, is seeing this increase, only convinces me more that this increase is really a result of environmental stimuli and information that children are being exposed to, while they’re still growing and their brains are still developing.

Anyway, you might be wondering why I went off on that tangent about type 1 and type 2 LGBT people. Well, it connects back to this woman’s comments about schools “producing heterosexuality”. You see, despite the claims they make that all LGBT people are just “born that way”, I believe that they actually know damn well that this isn’t always the case. This woman is angry at schools for “producing heterosexuality”, because she knows that in some cases at least, it is possible to produce homosexuality and transgenderism, and for her own reasons, she wants to encourage that to happen. What her reasons are, I can only speculate. One thing I am certain of however, is that when she complains about “heteronormativity”, it isn’t because she cares about the well-being of any LGBT children.

Playing “house,” for instance, is one area in which Gansen observed “heteronormativity” in the in the preschool setting, noting that only girls would imitate mothers while only boys would play fathers.

Wow. Can you even begin to comprehend? That’s so sick and twisted. Girls role-playing as mothers and boys role-playing as fathers. This is so unfair, because it denies the existence of the millions of girls who become fathers, and the millions of boys who become mothers. Oh wait, I forgot. In real life, “father” is an exclusively male term, and “mother” is an exclusively female term, so that never actually happens.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAknAAAAJDNkYWUwNTRkLTBlMTYtNDU2NS1iNWJhLTk0ZjUxNWEyYzNmNw.jpg
A little girl pretending to be a mother, and a little boy pretending to be a father. Remember when this would have been considered cute and innocent, rather than something to be attacked?

If a girl asked to be the husband of the household, she would be quickly rebuffed by her peers, Gansen observed, lamenting that “children did not allow cross-gender roles.”

Girls can’t be husbands in real life. Get over it. Besides, while you’re complaining about this, did it ever once occur to you, to consider the feelings of the boy in this scenario? Maybe he doesn’t want to play the wife, and why should he be forced to?

Gansen also cited the reading of “traditional fairy tales,”

Which generations of children grew up hearing, and turned out fine…

engaging in “heteronormative play,”

Which generations of children grew up playing, and turned out fine…

and teachers suggesting that a boy has a “crush” on a girl as other ways in which gender-roles are perpetuated.

Maybe the boy does have a crush on the girl. Seriously, what’s the fucking problem here? These people are obsessed. I can guarantee that if the boy had a crush on another boy, this woman would be celebrating it. It’s just like with their weird desire to completely reverse all  gender norms. If a woman chooses the role of a housewife, she’s attacked for doing so. If a man becomes a househusband, it’s celebrated. If a man is highly ambitious and aggressively competitive, he has “toxic masculinity”. If a woman is highly ambitious and aggressively competitive, she’s a “strong, confident woman”. Essentially, men are pathologised for acting like traditional men, women are pathologised for acting like traditional women, but both men and women are celebrated for acting like the traditional version of the opposite gender.

d8a71cab0be179d14afb2948cbfcc7c6
Progress

Meanwhile, teachers apparently make similar mistakes when they refer to “same-gender signs of affection or homosocial behaviors as friendly” as opposed to romantic, with Gansen arguing that  the teacher’s interpretation of the friendship makes no concession for the fact that some students might be gay or queer.

See what I mean? It’s wrong for a teacher to think that a boy has a crush on a girl, but if the teacher fails to assume that a boy has a crush on his male friend, that’s also wrong.

As a solution, Gansen concludes by outlining “disruptive” approaches teachers can take, which include talking about the legality of gay marriage and showing “acceptance” when students participate in “actions that interrupt heteronormativity.”

A “solution” to a problem nobody ever asked to be solved.

Gansen finishes by complaining that even in the preschools with the most progressive teachers of all the ones she observed, “children still engaged in heteronormative practices with peers,” adding that “these findings demonstrate the importance of teachers actively working to disrupt heteronormativity, which is already ingrained in children by ages 3 to 5.”

Wow if that’s really the case, then how are there any gay people in the world at all?

Campus Reform reached out to Gansen for additional comment on her research, but did not receive a response in time for publication.

Of course not. People like this want to “talk at” us, rather than “talk to”. There’s no point even engaging with her. She should just be ridiculed.