Three violent incidents in a two day period.

20156130_451685491868629_4874733659127867774_n
*sigh*, will the counter ever stop being reset?

So we’re all well aware of what happened in Spain, but apparently Spain wasn’t the only European country to be “culturally enriched” lately. I would just like to offer my heartfelt condolences to *checks sheet of paper*.. ah yes, Helsinki and Berlin. Much like what happened the night before in *checks sheet again*… Barcelona, yes, these are terrible tragedies, but we must not allow them to change how we think. Diversity is our greatest strength afterall, and attacks like these must not divide us. Our diversity is what unifies us. Yes, division equals unity. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

From Times of India

HELSINKI/BERLIN: In two separate incidents of stabbings on Friday, two people were killed and six injured in the Finnish city of Turku, while another man was hacked to death in the western German city of Wuppertal.

The Finnish Police shot one suspect in the legs and arrested him. Security forces wrote on Twitter that police were “looking for other possible perpetrators”.

One killed in stabbing in western Germany, attacker on the run

Police confirmed that one man was stabbed to death and another injured in Wuppertal, adding that the attacker was still on the loose.

Police in Germany said they were hunting for one or more assailants, but could not immediately provide more information about the circumstances of the attack

The stabbing happened at around 1245 GMT in the city’s Elberfeld area.

Both the incidents come a day after 14 people were killed in twin terror attacks in Spain.

You know, I haven’t been posting a whole lot recently, because as I mentioned, I’m somewhat burned out on everything that has been happening. I know that there were a couple of incidents in France recently for example, that I didn’t even bother writing about. The fact is, these sorts of incidents are nothing unusual anymore. They happen on a damn near weekly basis at this point, and if you add in all the other types of “enrichment”, such as acid attacks, rapes, Muslim grooming gangs etc, you’re pretty much seeing multiple events taking place all over Europe every single day. It’s impossible to discuss them all, let alone think of anything original to say about them each time.

However, these three separate attacks all followed closely on the heels of the incident in Charlottesville, when a quote, unquote, “white supremacist”, plowed his car into a crowd of “peaceful counter-protesters”, killing one in the process. I think it makes an interesting comparison to see the reaction in the mainstream media and on social media to the Charlottesville incident, and then to compare it to the reaction to the typical Islamic terror attacks, like the three most recent ones.

First of all, lets just give a little background context as to what was actually going on in Charlottesville. In the past few years in America, there has been this obsession on the far left, with tearing down monuments and symbols associated with the Confederacy, because they consider these monuments to be a glorification of slavery, and therefore consider them to be “racist” and “oppressive”.

george-orwell-1984-every-record-has-been-destroyed-or-falsified-25408969.pngHowever, there are a lot of other people who don’t consider these monuments offensive, but rather consider them a part of their heritage, and are against their removal. People like this are worried about a possible slippery slope occurring. If these monuments are offensive because of their association with slavery, then what’s to stop people from later finding other icons of American history offensive? Afterall, George Washington himself was a slave owner, so whose to say that these unhinged lunatics won’t eventually be calling for Mount Rushmore to be blown up, and for everything named after Washington, including their capital city no less, to be renamed to something “less offensive” and “more inclusive”? Indeed, as this video from Mark Dice shows, some already are making these demands.

So people who actually take pride in their history and their heritage, and who have realised from experience that these hate-filled lunatics will never be satisfied and will only keep pushing for more, had decided that enough was enough, and that they were going to protest against the planned removal of these monuments. So they organised a march to protest this and even went through the proper channels and obtained a permit. However, the city attempted to revoke this permit. This decision was appealed and a federal judge ruled that revoking the permit would be a violation of the protesters first amendment rights, thus over-ruling the decision of the city’s officials.

So many different groups of people, with many different agendas, united by their common interest in preserving the monuments, turned up to this protest. This did indeed include legitimate white supremacists, KKK, and Neo-Nazi types, but with the way American law works, there’s nothing illegal about having any particular political ideology, no matter how offensive it might be. As long as these groups protested peacefully, there was nothing that could be done to them. Many of them did turn up to the protest armed however, and detractors are citing this as “proof” that violence was their goal all along. However, I don’t believe this was the case at all.

Whenever any groups of white people turn up to protest in favour of their group interests, or attend speeches by people who campaign for them, these events are always attended by Antifa and other groups, who have the intended goal of shutting them down, usually employing extreme violence to do so. Indeed, I’ve discussed this sort of thing before, when the gay, half-Jew, black cock obsessed Milo (whose also apparently a Neo-Nazi, white supremacist), was giving a speech in Berkeley, and Antifa rioted against the event. So knowing that violent Antifa thugs were guaranteed to show up and engage in violence as they normally do, does it not make sense to arm yourselves in anticipation? The weapons weren’t brought in order to start trouble. They were brought as a defensive measure, in preparation for when Antifa did.

TRUMP_INAUGURATION_DCJM135-2017JAN20_022721_165.jpg
They do this every single time.

So sure enough, Antifa and other violent leftist groups showed up to the event as counter-protesters. Then the police, most likely under the orders of city officials themselves, made the whole situation worse. As I already mentioned, the city had attempted to revoke the protester’s permits, but was over-ruled by a federal judge. However, even though the federal judge ruled that they were allowed to protest, the police decided half way through that the march was “unlawful” and ordered the protesters to disperse. I’ve even heard it suggested that after ordering them to disperse, that the police deliberately herded the protesters right towards the counter-protesters, were they were free to take cheap shots at them with baseball bats as they walked by. Indeed, video footage seems to confirm this.

Go to roughly 51:44 to see the protesters being marched out single file by the police, past the counter-protesters, and watch as the counter-protesters start throwing things at them and hitting them with bats.

So eventually the violence gets to a point were one of the alt-right guys plows through a crowd in his car, injuring many and killing one of them. As soon as this happened, the media leapt on it and started declaring it a “terrorist attack” immediately. However, can we really be certain that this was the case? Terrorism has a very specific definition. It’s about using violence and intimidation in order to pursue an ideological objective. When a Muslim runs over a crowd of people, yelling “Allahu Akbar” while doing so, it’s obvious that his motivation is ideologically based, and therefore fits the definition of terrorism.

1465842213289
Well, it’s obvious to most people.

The problem is, we can’t be certain that this guy ran over the crowd for ideological reasons, at least not until it is properly investigated. With all the violence and chaos going on, he may simply have done so in a panic, trying to escape from it. Alternatively, maybe he did do it on purpose, but it could have been as a result of road rage, due to the anger he felt from having his car attacked by the counter-protesters. Or maybe it is a genuine terrorist attack and he did so in support of the ideology of white supremacy. The point is, we don’t know yet if it does fit the definition of terrorism, but the media doesn’t care, because they are determined to promote their narrative that “white supremacists” are the most dangerous group of terrorists of all, and in order to do that, they need to have a few examples of white supremacist terrorists.

anders-breivik.jpg
Anders Breivik was a pretty long time ago by now. They need some fresher examples of white supremacist terrorists that they can cite.

So Trump comes out and condemns the violence and hatred on both sides, and the media goes into hysteria, because he doesn’t condemn “white supremacists” specifically. As far as the media is concerned, condemning both sides equally, when both sides were engaged in violence (and the other side were the ones who started it no less), is the same thing to them as if he had condoned the white supremacists.

So eventually he does come out and condemn white supremacists specifically, and the media still isn’t satisfied, because he didn’t do it quickly enough, or with enough enthusiasm for their liking. This of course is nothing new. Back during the election campaign, they made a big deal about white supremacists endorsing him, and his apparent “refusal to disavow them”, even though he disavowed them constantly.

So lets look at a few of the double standards we’re seeing on display here.

  • Muslims constantly commit terrorist acts in white majority countries. The media tries to downplay them as being due to “mental illness” on the part of the attackers. White guy who may or may not be a white supremacist (for all we know, he’s just someone who wants to preserve the statues), runs over a crowd one time. Media instantly claims that it was an act of terrorism, before the facts are even established.
  • Whenever a Muslim terrorist attack happens, the narrative is always that it’s just a tiny minority who do it, and that it doesn’t reflect Islam as a whole. The media calls for tolerance and understanding towards Muslims, and condemns anyone who speaks out as a “racist” or an “Islamophobe”. White people stand up for their own group interests, peacefully 99% of the time. The 1% of the time were violence does happen and the media condemns every single person with any belief in pursuing white interests, and tars them all with the slurs of “white supremacist” or “Neo-Nazi”, and demands action be taken against them.
  • Antifa and Black Lives Matter, constantly riot and violently attack people, whose political opinions they disagree with. Media downplays them as being “peaceful protests”, and any violence is from a “small minority, which doesn’t represent the movement as a whole”. White nationalists attempt to have a genuinely peaceful protest, get attacked by Antifa, and then fight back to defend themselves from this violence. They’re all violent thugs, and every member of the movement is bad. There are no good people pursuing white interests. They’re all white supremacists, and they’re all automatically violent, just because of their beliefs, even if they don’t commit any actual acts of violence.
  • Hillary/Obama/Bernie Sanders supporters, make up the ranks of Antifa and BLM, and are constantly involved in violence. The media doesn’t demand that anyone of them disavow the support of these groups. Meanwhile the media constantly demands that Trump disavows the support of “white supremacists” (ie, anyone who believes that white people have a right to pursue their own political interests), and as the video above shows, they don’t even listen to him when he does disavow their support anyway.

When you look at the reaction to what happened in Charlottesville, you would think the world itself was ending, and that this is one of the worst things to ever happen. Yet, we’ve seen months of violent riots from Antifa groups, months of violent riots from Black Lives Matter groups, and countless examples of Muslim terrorist attacks, including at least three in the past two days alone, and none of it ever generates even a fraction of the outrage that this Charlottesville incident has. This suggests that Charlottesville specifically holds special significance to the media, and the only logical explanation, is that the reason why it holds special significance, is because of the groups involved.

What people need to understand, is that none of this is an accident, nor is it a case that the media is simply too “politically correct” and cowardly, to address these issues honestly. No, this is completely deliberate and malicious in its intent. The mainstream media in the Western world, does not exist for the purpose of keeping the population informed about what is actually going on. In fact, it exists for the exact opposite purpose.

In reality, our civilisations have been infiltrated by an enemy that wants to exterminate and replace us all. In order to ensure this extermination occurs, it needs to keep us misinformed and asleep to what is actually happening. As long as we’re unaware, we can’t resist. When Muslim terrorists are constantly killing us, it runs the risk of waking us up, so they deliberately try to downplay what is happening, so that we don’t rise up and demand their removal. When white people protest in favour of our group interests, they deliberately send groups like Antifa and BLM to violently shut us down, and then use their control of the supply of information, to pretend that these Antifa and BLM types are peaceful protesters, rather than the vicious thugs that they really are. When white people come together simply to stand up for our own group interests, against the Muslims who are killing us, or the perpetually offended special snowflakes who want to strip us of our history, they create blatantly false narratives about us, claiming that we’re the violent ones, or that we’re the supremacists, simply for defending ourselves. When we elect a leader who campaigns on representing our interests, and actually tries to do what we want, they use their control of the media to constantly attack him, to destroy his reputation, and to pressure him into disavowing us, in the hopes of creating a divide between him and his base of support.

None of this is an accident. Just think about it honestly. Do you really honestly believe that they could be reporting so much wrong, just by mistake, or that it’s just a coincidence that they always just happen to condemn the right-wing white groups, and defend the non-white and the left-wing groups, no matter which side is the one who is actually in the wrong? No, it’s not a coincidence. It’s done on purpose, because the media is nothing more than a propaganda tool that is under the control of a small and hostile minority, that is at war with the ordinary citizens of their countries.

Now, if only we knew just who that enemy could be.

HanAssholeSolo-meme-768x1177

hollywood-jews

jew-media-masters-2

media-controlled-zionist-jews

Times-of-Israel-jews-media

7thu8qw

1392122783353.jpg

 

Another week, another case of cultural enrichment in Paris.

20156130_451685491868629_4874733659127867774_n.jpg
The counter has clearly seen better days.

I haven’t been posting a whole lot recently because I’ve been feeling somewhat burned out from the daily grind of being awake to the sheer insanity that the Western world is living under these days. Sooner or later, it takes its toll on you, and you just need to take a break. Because of this, I have actually missed out on writing about several attacks that have taken place in various European countries the past few weeks. Really, what can I say that I haven’t already said several times already? The formula for when these attacks happen is so predictable at this point, that there’s really not much new that I can say. It always goes something like this:

  • A report comes out of a bombing/mass stabbing/vehicular attack, in some random European city.
  • Details about the suspect are kept as vague as possible (unless it’s one of the rare cases were it’s a white guy, in which case, details are reported immediately).
  • Occasionally, it is reported that the suspect yelled “ALLAHU AKBAR” before attacking. Motivation for attack is apparently “unclear”
allahu-akbar-clearly-this-sad-green-motives-are-frog-signifies-18047688.png
Just in case you’ve forgotten…
  • Comment sections on articles about the attack devolve into arguments between “racists” who predict that it was a Muslim, and people who are more concerned about condemning these “racist” comments, than about the attack itself.
  • Eventually, it is revealed that it was indeed a Muslim. Media claim that the attacker was suffering from “mental illness”, just like every other attacker who coincidentally, attacks in the name of Islam.

1465842213289.png

  • Media starts talking about how “right wing extremists” (who almost never kill anyone) are the real threat, and that normal Muslims are the real victims, because people are saying mean things about their religious beliefs, and this is apparently much more damaging than being killed.
  • Nobody learns their lesson, and people continue on like normal, until the next attack happens, at which point, the cycle repeats itself.

Anyway, I wanted to draw attention to the fact that France has experienced yet another attack today, not because there’s anything original or noteworthy about it, but because it happened shortly after a new law came into place in France recently. This law prevents people convicted of actions related to any form of discrimination, including racism, from running for political office in the country.

The problem is that as we all know, the bar for what is actually considered “racism” in most European countries, is pretty low, so low in fact, that often just speaking out about what is happening, can be considered racist. So in other words, if a person actually speaks out about what is happening and wishes to run for political office and implement changes to stop it from continuing, they run the risk of being banned from even doing so. This is a complete violation of democracy, and pretty much makes it impossible anymore for France to even save itself through democratic means. It makes it so that the people will no longer have anyone to choose from, if they want a candidate who will deal with the mass immigration and terrorism that is plaguing their country.

161114152205-marine-le-pen-france-flag-super-tease.jpg
You should have voted for Le Pen when you had the chance to, France.

This shows the desperation of our enemies. They can see that the people are waking up to what they’re doing, and now in their panic to shut us down, their masks have slipped, and they’re showing their true colours. They want nothing less than our complete extermination, and they’ll do whatever it takes to prevent us from stopping it. The problem is, that as JFK himself once said:

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

France had a violent revolution before, when the people were pushed too far. With democratic options being taken off the table, they might eventually feel as if they have no other choice, but to do it again…

guillotine.jpg
Possibly coming soon…

 

“Preschools are too ‘heteronormative'”

I was always under the impression that the purpose of preschools, was to teach children how to socialise and interact with other children. Turns out I was wrong. The real purpose of them is to be a sort of “reverse conversion therapy”, where heterosexual kids are brainwashed into becoming LGBT.

From Campus Reform

A University of Michigan instructor recently claimed that preschool classrooms are rife with “heteronormativity” that perpetuates “inequalities related to gender.”

Now just watch as she fails to back this up with any actual meaningful points, instead just relying on buzzwords and personal opinions.

Heidi M. Gansen, a Ph.D. student who teaches sociology at UMich, advanced these claims in a July 14 article that examines the prevalence of “heteronormativity” in a set of nine Michigan preschool classrooms she visited.

And this is why the value of a college education keeps on declining. The fact that a deranged Marxist ideologue like this woman is actually paid to teach people, is absolutely hilarious. Or at least, it would be hilarious, if it wasn’t so tragic. To any unfortunate student who was naive enough to sign up for this class, I just want to wish you good luck trying to pay off your tens of thousands of dollars of student loan debt, especially while working at the one job you’re likely to get, with a qualification such as this.

ly.jpg
“Do you want fries with that?”

Defining “heteronormativity” as a culture in which “heterosexuality is always assumed, expected, ordinary, and privileged,” Gansen then argues that the issue is especially important to her research because preschools contribute to the “reproduction of inequalities pertaining to gender and sexuality,” such as gender roles and gendered feelings.

Does all that sound like a bunch of nonsensical, confusing, gibberish to you? If so, then good, that’s exactly the point. It’s supposed to be confusing for the average person to comprehend what this all even means. Basically, this woman is complaining that heterosexuality is presumed to be the “norm” in society, just because the vast majority of people, happen to be heterosexual. Because most people happen to be heterosexual, most other people will naturally presume that others are heterosexual, because statistically speaking, about 96% of people, will be, unless they’re specifically told otherwise. However, she seems to think that this way of interacting with one another marginalises the remaining 4% who aren’t, and therefore, we need to change our natural behaviour, and act as if there’s a 50/50 split between gay and straight people.

“Preschool is a good place to begin this examination, because practices that facilitate heteronormativity in classrooms become more engrained in later years of schooling,” she explains.

It’s a good place to begin the examination, because the best way to brainwash people into accepting your deranged world view, is to target them when they’re young, and their brains aren’t fully developed yet. That’s what it’s really all about. She wants to perpetuate her Cultural Marxist bollocksology, and who better to promote it to than young kids who haven’t yet developed the ability to think critically?

He-Alone-Who-Owns-The-Youth-Gains-The-Future-Adolf-Hitler.jpg

Accordingly, Gansen spent ten months observing childhood behavior at a set of nine Michigan preschools, finding numerous ways in which heterosexuality is “produced” and “enforced” by students and teachers.

Wait, I’m confused. Heterosexuality is “produced” now? But I was under the impression that one of the leading arguments of the LGBT rights lobby, was that you’re “born with your sexuality”, and that you can’t choose or change it. So I don’t understand how she can then make the claim that these teachers are “producing heterosexuality”.

In all seriousness, I’m of the believe that sexuality is determined by a mixture of nurture and nature, rather than just one or the other. I’ve heard it suggested before that both homosexuality and transgenderism is similar to diabetes, in that there’s a “Type 1” and a “Type 2”.

injection_2227502b.jpg
No don’t worry, I’m not suggesting that we can start injecting gay people with insulin, in order to make them straight.

Much like with diabetes, someone with type 1 homosexuality or transgenderism, will be someone who was just born that way. I do believe that there are people who are just naturally born to be gay or transgender, and nothing in the environment will change that. However, just like how people get type 2 diabetes, due to their life experiences, I believe that life experiences in the time before puberty (and by extension, before sexuality has developed) can impact how a person’s sexuality develops. Just look at this study for example:

“Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. “

Look at the variance there. 46% of gay men interviewed for the study, claimed to experience homosexual molestation as a child, compared to just 7% of straight men, and there’s a similar variance between the experiences of lesbians and straight women. When looking at information like that, is it really hard to consider the possibility that having such experiences before they reached adolescence, and while their brains were still developing, could have warped their perceptions of sexuality somewhat. As I’ve said, I’m by no means suggesting that every single gay person is someone who was “turned gay from molestation” as a child, as I do believe that plenty of gay people are just born that way, but it’s still something that needs to be acknowledged.

And as for transgenderism, well consider this. In the most gender equal country on the planet, Sweden, the number of children looking to undergo sex changes is apparently doubling each year.  Supporters will claim the numbers actually aren’t any higher than they ever were before, but it’s just less taboo now to go public about it, but I’m too cynical to agree. Personally, I believe that there has always existed a very tiny minority of people with gender dysphoria (the type 1s), but what we’re now seeing is a drastic increase in the type 2s, as a result of campaigns to normalise and encourage it. The fact that a country like Sweden of all places, is seeing this increase, only convinces me more that this increase is really a result of environmental stimuli and information that children are being exposed to, while they’re still growing and their brains are still developing.

Anyway, you might be wondering why I went off on that tangent about type 1 and type 2 LGBT people. Well, it connects back to this woman’s comments about schools “producing heterosexuality”. You see, despite the claims they make that all LGBT people are just “born that way”, I believe that they actually know damn well that this isn’t always the case. This woman is angry at schools for “producing heterosexuality”, because she knows that in some cases at least, it is possible to produce homosexuality and transgenderism, and for her own reasons, she wants to encourage that to happen. What her reasons are, I can only speculate. One thing I am certain of however, is that when she complains about “heteronormativity”, it isn’t because she cares about the well-being of any LGBT children.

Playing “house,” for instance, is one area in which Gansen observed “heteronormativity” in the in the preschool setting, noting that only girls would imitate mothers while only boys would play fathers.

Wow. Can you even begin to comprehend? That’s so sick and twisted. Girls role-playing as mothers and boys role-playing as fathers. This is so unfair, because it denies the existence of the millions of girls who become fathers, and the millions of boys who become mothers. Oh wait, I forgot. In real life, “father” is an exclusively male term, and “mother” is an exclusively female term, so that never actually happens.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAknAAAAJDNkYWUwNTRkLTBlMTYtNDU2NS1iNWJhLTk0ZjUxNWEyYzNmNw.jpg
A little girl pretending to be a mother, and a little boy pretending to be a father. Remember when this would have been considered cute and innocent, rather than something to be attacked?

If a girl asked to be the husband of the household, she would be quickly rebuffed by her peers, Gansen observed, lamenting that “children did not allow cross-gender roles.”

Girls can’t be husbands in real life. Get over it. Besides, while you’re complaining about this, did it ever once occur to you, to consider the feelings of the boy in this scenario? Maybe he doesn’t want to play the wife, and why should he be forced to?

Gansen also cited the reading of “traditional fairy tales,”

Which generations of children grew up hearing, and turned out fine…

engaging in “heteronormative play,”

Which generations of children grew up playing, and turned out fine…

and teachers suggesting that a boy has a “crush” on a girl as other ways in which gender-roles are perpetuated.

Maybe the boy does have a crush on the girl. Seriously, what’s the fucking problem here? These people are obsessed. I can guarantee that if the boy had a crush on another boy, this woman would be celebrating it. It’s just like with their weird desire to completely reverse all  gender norms. If a woman chooses the role of a housewife, she’s attacked for doing so. If a man becomes a househusband, it’s celebrated. If a man is highly ambitious and aggressively competitive, he has “toxic masculinity”. If a woman is highly ambitious and aggressively competitive, she’s a “strong, confident woman”. Essentially, men are pathologised for acting like traditional men, women are pathologised for acting like traditional women, but both men and women are celebrated for acting like the traditional version of the opposite gender.

d8a71cab0be179d14afb2948cbfcc7c6
Progress

Meanwhile, teachers apparently make similar mistakes when they refer to “same-gender signs of affection or homosocial behaviors as friendly” as opposed to romantic, with Gansen arguing that  the teacher’s interpretation of the friendship makes no concession for the fact that some students might be gay or queer.

See what I mean? It’s wrong for a teacher to think that a boy has a crush on a girl, but if the teacher fails to assume that a boy has a crush on his male friend, that’s also wrong.

As a solution, Gansen concludes by outlining “disruptive” approaches teachers can take, which include talking about the legality of gay marriage and showing “acceptance” when students participate in “actions that interrupt heteronormativity.”

A “solution” to a problem nobody ever asked to be solved.

Gansen finishes by complaining that even in the preschools with the most progressive teachers of all the ones she observed, “children still engaged in heteronormative practices with peers,” adding that “these findings demonstrate the importance of teachers actively working to disrupt heteronormativity, which is already ingrained in children by ages 3 to 5.”

Wow if that’s really the case, then how are there any gay people in the world at all?

Campus Reform reached out to Gansen for additional comment on her research, but did not receive a response in time for publication.

Of course not. People like this want to “talk at” us, rather than “talk to”. There’s no point even engaging with her. She should just be ridiculed.

A small sample of what we’re up against: Part 4

In case it isn’t obvious, I’m suffering from a very severe case of writer’s block at the moment. I guess I’m just getting fed up constantly writing about the same kinds of insanity happening over and over again. I feel as if I’m just covering the same ground with every post, and that really effects my motivation to write anything.

Nevertheless, I do still want to keep making posts, as I enjoy doing this blog, so today I’m going to do what I always do, whenever I’m going through a drought of content. I’m going to post another batch of content that I’ve taken from the TumblrInAction reddit board, just to give you an insight into the kind of insanity that we’re dealing with in this world. If you want to see my previous posts on this topic, please click here, to see part 3, and from there, you can find the links to parts 1 and 2.

Anyway, enjoy…

_8DhQpJXFf1aWP07X1IuH3hClSXm9ckDpuWVe0uQ_qU.png
Kale is indigenous to Europe by the way, meaning white people were eating it long before blacks. Though really, does that even matter? This idiot is literally dictating to an entire race, what they can eat.
3yXvSN3LCcuyWGvd7Sv33QRklL9IFA-o2GlFMY8z8yA.png
Crazy person trying to encourage a child to become just as crazy as they are.  Remember when this would have been considered child abuse?
7ONlEblCAsIcu6u2icNgjaX4oHojO5Ia704WOsVDpNM.png
The only reason why it would collapse, is because the Jews control most of America, including their media, academia, and financial systems, and would almost certainly sabotage them on purpose, on their way out.
61bba30f00cf4ed694644c227a5eb9ec.jpg
This is an actual presentation that a black student is giving in college. Imagine the outrage, if a white student had a similar presentation about black people. But yeah, white people are the privileged ones.
7933bd745e73480cbe97b2bee8c3232c.jpg
How are these statements related in any way?
c4cf92284ee6477292cbe2c9462efae8.jpg
Whites are the most violent, even though blacks, Arabs, and Hispanics all commit more violent crime than whites do, and white majority countries are so well run, that all these other groups flock by the millions to live in them. If white people are so violent, why do non-white people want to live in our countries so badly?
cHfuT0K.jpg
Can anyone explain why exactly it is necessary to change Santa’s race? What is the benefit of doing so? What is the point? How does it even make sense, considering the fact that Santa is based on the real historical figure, St Nicholas, a white man?
cLvnab1.jpg
Wow, I guess all those doctors and scientists were wrong. Also, I guess it’s just a coincidence that it’s mainly fat people who get type 2 diabetes. Thank you anonymous tumblr user, for telling us the truth.
E4g1LAG
“Don’t generalise all Muslims, based on the actions of a minority of them.” *proceeds to unfairly generalise all cops, all Americans, and all white people*
eoQfNVB.png
According to this person’s logic, roughly half of her fellow citizens are racists and misogynists. How will she ever survive there, if that’s the case? she should probably emigrate to Trudeau’s Canada instead.
erSyNh0NsIJHG5gwWoTZgInTWHiDYdCEPC_O6fOYLlU
This is why China and India are gradually catching up with the West. How can we ever be expected to compete in the world, if THIS is the sort of thing that people are studying at college?This person is probably even less employable than someone with no college education at all, and probably tens of thousands of dollars in debt as well.
ETm1Xsoi8p6uWXkIehpeW4Ni5Gm__-RGGhhRcckrJF0.png
Are we going to get an explanation as to why this is so? no, of course not.
f3e3f6h.png
Being called by the name on their birth cert, and the name that they are probably registered with the college by, makes them feel unsafe. How can a person this fragile be expected to function in the real world? How will they handle it, when the Muslims are getting ready to throw them off the top of a building, if hearing their own name is enough to make them feel unsafe?
f6425b0ee9174aca9731ff9f438ae2df.jpg
Even if you by into the idea that “gender” and “sex” are two different things, it doesn’t change the fact that “male/female”, “men/women”, “boy/girl” are more often used to refer to a person’s biological sex, rather than their subjective gender identity. It has always been this way. So in other words, if you feel like you’re a woman, despite being born in the body of a biological male, that’s your choice and you can refer to yourself as you wish. However, you don’t get the right to dictate how others (the majority, I might add) perceive reality, so if they choose to use these words in reference to a person’s biological sex, that’s their choice.
Gb74vD8.png
Or it’s just common courtesy that when you’re in a different country, that you make an effort to learn the language of the local people, so you can communicate with them. Nobody forced these non-English speakers, to come live in an English speaking country. They made a choice, and there are consequences of making that choice. Also, what a racist statement you’ve just made. It’s not just “people of colour” who have to learn English as a second language in America. White people from non-English speaking countries do too.
gDxpMH1
The internet is full of this by the way. Pathetic weaklings, self diagnosing themselves with PTSD for example, because a white male held a door open for them, and this “blatant act of sexism” triggered them. Or morbidy obese fatasses diagnosing themselves with an underactive thyroid, when really, they’re just lazy and greedy.
GqbWDdo.png
Being fit isn’t a privilege. It takes hard work and discipline to be fit.  This woman could be fit too, if she hit the gym, and ate a bit less. Instead of doing this, she chooses to attack someone else who has, and act as if she is the victim. I don’t know if she actually is a hypocrite, but it sure looks as if she might well be a hippo-crite 😛
HDlwQJh.png
“Stuff black people like: Rap music. Fried chicken. Watermel…” “OMG SHUT THE FUCK UP RACIST!!!! HOW DARE YOU GENERALISE A WHOLE RACE LIKE THAT?!?!?!?”
Hmp9EzS.png
No it’s because when they see them with their significant other, they know that they’re off the market. When they see them by themselves, there is a possibility that they might be single, and seeing as men are the ones expected to make the first move in human courtship, it’s nothing unusual for them to at least try their luck.
HSgdE6.png
Feeling guilty about their “white male privilege”. Lives in New York. I’m betting this guy was a Jew.

Anyway, that’s it for now, but I can assure you, there will be a part 5 at some stage.

Bill Nye advocates white genocide.

Bill Nye, an actor  who became famous in the 1990s for pretending to be a scientist on some Disney channel show appeared on a panel a few months ago, to discuss climate change. The panel suggested that population growth is a significant factor in climate change, and that population control (perhaps taking the form of something akin to China’s “One child policy”), might be necessary in order to prevent catastrophic climate changes. However they only seem to advocate population control for one particular group of people, which will be blatantly obvious, once you watch the video.

Isn’t it interesting really, that most of the really out of control population growth is happening in the Third World currently? In most of the developed world however, birth rates are already falling below replacement level. Yet despite the fact that the developed world is already having less children than necessary just to maintain a steady and stable population level, Nye and his fellow panelists suggest that it is they specifically who need to have less children. Meanwhile, China and India between them have about one third of the entire global population, and are two of the biggest polluters of all, yet nobody is advocating population control for them. As usual, it’s only being pushed on white majority countries, most of which already have declining birth rates as it is.

And sure, we know exactly what will happen then. White majority countries will start having even less children. Suddenly, the media and political establishment will put our scaremongering stories about how we have an “aging population” and that we need a population increase, in order to keep the economy going. This will be used to justify for even more mass immigration from the third world, with the hopes of eventually making us minorities in our own ancestral homelands.

You see, they can’t realistically make the claim that the first world needs to curtail its population growth, in order to fight climate change, and at the same time claim that people in the first world aren’t having enough babies, so we need to bring more people from the third world into the first world, in order to offset a shrinking population. Yet this is exactly what they’re doing. If first world population growth was really causing climate change and therefore needed to be curtailed, it makes absolutely no sense to then start bringing more people into the first world from outside, where they’ll help contribute to the problem, but yet they do try to push both of these contradictory positions at the same time anyway.

This is because they want nothing less than the extermination and extinction of white people. They don’t give a damn about the environment, nor do they give a damn about the plight of people in the third world. They just really hate white people and will use any tactic in order to speed up our demise. Luckily enough, from reading the comments on the video, it seems that most people can see right through them.

#CNNblackmail

CNN_FAKE_NEWS.png

In my most recent post, I discussed the hysterical CNN overreaction to an internet meme that Trump drew attention to by retweeting on his Twitter.  CNN tried (with a straight face) to make the ridiculous claim that the animated GIF of Trump beating up the CNN logo (just the logo, not a specific person), was somehow inciting violence against journalists, and compared it to how journalists are treated in totalitarian regimes, where they’re regularly tortured and murdered, simply for reporting facts that the regime doesn’t like. This was after they had been exposed as liars for continuing to push the Russian hoax, even admitting on camera that they knew damn well that it was complete bullshit the entire time, and after having numerous times supported words and actions that could have been interpreted as inciting violence against Trump. Hypocrisy, thy name is CNN.

Anyway, just when we all thought that CNN couldn’t possibly sink any lower, they have somehow managed to do the impossible, outdo themselves, and sink to even lower depths. Because CNN had their feelings hurt by the animated GIF, they decided to investigate who was responsible for creating it in the first place, eventually tracing it back to a Reddit user by the name of “HanAssholeSolo”. Then they discovered, much to their horror, that this fellow was behind several more anti-CNN posts, with one in particular standing out to them. He had noticed a certain commonality between top figures at CNN and posted this meme.

HanAssholeSolo-meme-768x1177.jpg
The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”~ Joseph Goebbels

So HanAssholeSolo was guilty of the most heinous crime of all. He noticed uncomfortable “coincidences” involving Jews, and had the audacity to draw attention to it. Meanwhile, CNN has no problem pointing out that Trump’s cabinet is full of white males.

Screen-Shot-2017-07-05-at-7.47.21-AM.png

So it’s OK for them to draw attention to the fact that white males dominate positions of power in Trump’s cabinet, but when someone else draws attention to the fact that Jews dominate positions of power at their organisation, that’s an unforgivable crime that needs to be punished. But what can we expect sure? They’ve already proven themselves to be massive hypocrites with regards to this whole “inciting violence” thing. Is it really unexpected that they’d be massive hypocrites on this issue as well?

So because of this unforgivable crime, CNN used all the resources at their disposal to figure out the true identity of this HanAssholeSolo fellow, and when they did so, they coerced him into making an apology, taking down the memes that he made, and promising not to make any more like them. If he had refused to do any of this, they would have published his personal details, subjecting him and his family to public humiliation, and possible violence in the process. CNN also made it clear in their article on this story that they “Reserve the right” to publish his information, if he goes back on any of this.

Untitled.png
Just in case they edit it out of the article later. There it is, a blatant threat.

By the way, though this is unconfirmed, I’ve heard rumours that he’s actually only 15 years old. Can you imagine that? This 15 year old boy posts a funny meme that shows the CNN logo getting beaten up by Trump, and an image that simply points out the truth, that the majority of leading CNN figures are Jews, and these scumbags track him down and try to blackmail him into silence. This is not the actions of a professional and respectable news organisation. These are the actions you would expect from the Mafia.

Unfortunately for CNN, nobody likes a bully, and doing this has resulted in an even bigger backlash than what they already had received. Numerous prominent content creators on YouTube have voiced their disgust over this…

People are mad as hell about this, and so they should be. CNN constantly try to portray themselves of innocent victims of “violent rhetoric” simply for “doing their jobs”, but yet at the same time, they think they have the right to to bully and threaten a teenage boy, simply for exercising his constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech.

This is exactly why Jews have been so despised for as long as history has been aware of them. Just really think about it. We’re always hearing about how Jews have allegedly been oppressed and subjected to violence, anywhere they’ve lived historically, but do you notice how we never hear why? We’re always led to believe that they’re just innocent victims, and that their host nations inevitably turn against them, just because they’re evil and full of irrational hatred for them.

JewsExpelledStudentAllegoryMeme-1.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

Untitled.png

It’s all complete crap. If they had been persecuted or expelled from where they were living once or twice, you might think “OK, lets give them the benefit of the doubt here”. But when they suffered at least 109 expulsions historically (possibly even higher still than that), and after seeing behaviour like this from the CNN Jews, then does it not become obvious, that they’re the ones who are to blame for these expulsions, not everyone else? If this is the kind of behaviour that they’ve always been engaged in historically (and I’m inclined to believe that it is), then their previous expulsions have been well deserved and justified. They work together as a group to promote their own ethnic interests, while at the same time promoting policies that are detrimental to the interests of the majority (conflict with Russia, constant wars in the Middle East, mass third world immigration, anti-white rhetoric etc). Then when attention is drawn to the fact that they’re all Jews pushing these unpopular narratives, they screech like rats and use intimidation to try and silence any criticism against them. They’re pure evil.

devilgoestojew.jpg

Antisemitism is probably at its highest now than any time since WW2. This isn’t because we’ve all suddenly become Nazis. It’s because the truth about the collective behaviour of the Jews is reaching more and more people. Inevitably, the Jews have always managed to push their host societies too far, and ended up receiving a violent backlash in retaliation. This is because whenever they have gotten powerful enough, they’ve always gotten too cocky for their own good, and gotten careless with their decisions. As their controlled mainstream media continues to spiral into irrelevance, they’ve started panicking and lashing out uncontrollably. This freakout over a stupid joke and persecution of the boy behind it, are not the actions of rational people. It is the actions of a desperate and hysterical parasite, that is terrified of their host waking up to their presence. Yet ironically enough, their attempt to hide the truth, may in fact serve to wake more people up to it. Long may they continue to panic, and risk losing everything in the process.

“Trump is inciting violence against the media.”

19601273_10155706921899050_2973930685467326155_n.jpg

The “Russia hacked the election” narrative is dead. It was obvious to intelligent people that the whole thing was a hoax, as soon as the media started promoting it. People of average intelligence, started figuring it out in the months that followed, as they failed miserably to produce even a single shred of evidence to back up their claims. Stupid people have finally started seeing through their lies, after the crusading undercover Journalism conducted by Project Veritas, revealed CNN figures admitting on camera that the whole thing was complete crap (videos posted below)…

… and now the only people that remain, that still actually buy into this ridiculous narrative, are the stupidest and most uninformed, drooling imbeciles imaginable. Anyone with any sense, can see this story for the obvious lie that it is.

19665573_1553983034632094_6913435963789450472_n

19598928_10213934702060500_6219492364467619308_n

So what’s the media to do then? They have exposed themselves as liars and charlatans of the highest order, and their credibility is at an all time low. If they had any sense of self-awareness, they would realise that they’re entirely responsible for causing this themselves, and would be taking steps to win back the trust of the ordinary people. So of course, they do the exact opposite instead, and try to find a new ridiculous scandal to talk about in relation to Trump, one which they can run with in place of the now debunked Russian hoax, and boy, it is a stupid one. They’re now making the claim, that Trump is inciting violence against journalists.

19429983_1755979754416640_3619689311451793980_n.jpg

So here’s what has happened. Trump has regularly done business with the WWE over the years, and even was involved in a storyline 10 years ago that culminated at that year’s Wrestlemania… their biggest show of the year. As part of the storyline, he got into a (very fake looking) physical altercation with fellow Billionaire, and WWE owner, Vince McMahon.

So people online, having observed Trump’s ongoing war with the fake news mainstream media (of which CNN is probably the most shameless organisation of all), decided to have a bit of fun with this clip, by editing it so that CNN’s logo covered Vince McMahon’s head. Trump then retweeted this edited video.

So the sensible reaction to this would be to laugh it off and take it in good humour as the obvious joke that it is. Instead figures in the media have been acting hysterical, about how this was “disgraceful”, and that by retweeting this video of himself beating up the CNN logo, that Trump is attempting to encourage his supporters to engage in violence against journalists, simply for having the audacity to “keep him in check” and to “ask him the hard questions”. Even though in reality, they’ve already been exposed as liars and that’s the real reason he has a problem with them.

Just look at this video for example…

The CNN talking head is practically foaming at the mouth and on the verge of breaking down in tears at the “scary” and “dangerous” video that he retweeted. It’s absolutely incredible just how personally they’re taking this. He then shows a statement from the news organisation itself, in which they decry how he isn’t using his time to do his job (as if the two minutes or so it took to retweet the video had really made a difference to the amount of work he’s doing), and they condemned him for “inciting violence against reporters”.

I think it’s very hypocritical on their part to accuse him of inciting violence for doing this. Lets really look at this situation fairly.  Just before Trump’s inauguration as president, CNN ran a piece in which they fantasised about Trump and Pence getting assassinated, because due to the way American law works, Obama would have been able to appoint someone to the role in their place. They even made a point of specifically mentioning that this only applied up until that Friday at noon, as if to hint to any potential lunatics watching “If you want to stop him, make sure you do it before then”.

This isn’t an incitement of violence. It’s just journalism.

How about the fact that there was a version of Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” play, in which an actor portraying Trump is stabbed to death? not only did CNN defend the play, but their parent company, Time Warner, actually sponsored it.

This isn’t an incitement of violence. It’s just a play.

How about when (former) CNN regular, Kathy Griffin put out a video of herself holding what looked like Trump’s decapitated, bloody head? Yes, she was fired by CNN, but only after the backlash she received for doing so. The firing only took place after the backlash, so there’s no evidence to suggest that they would have done so, if there hadn’t been such an uproar.

video-228638.jpg
This isn’t an incitement to violence. It’s art.

And then how about the time when some lunatic tried to run on stage during a speech Trump was giving, in an attempt to attack him? CNN gave the guy a platform to speak, and treated him as if he was just a political activist, exercising his right to protest.

This isn’t an incitement of violence. It’s just encouraging young people to get active in politics.

So lets summarise here:

  • CNN subtly hints that Trump needs to be assassinated before his inaugeration, in order to prevent another Republican from succeeding him. Not inciting violence against Trump.
  • CNN’s parent company sponsors a play, in which Trump is assassinated. Not inciting violence against Trump.
  • CNN regular Kathy Griffin posts an image of herself holding a representation of Trump’s decapitated head. Not inciting violence against Trump.
  • CNN gives a platform to a lunatic who tried to attack Trump, and treats him like a hero in the process. Not inciting violence against Trump.
  • Trump posts a video, in which he is seen beating up the CNN logo (not any specific person, just the logo itself). “OMG HE’S INCITING VIOLENCE AGAINST JOURNALISTS!!! THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!”

Surely I’m not the only one who can see how stupid this whole narrative looks. I think it may actually be even worse than the Russia one. At least that one was complicated enough, that I can actually understand how people might have fallen for it. This though is just completely stupid. The hypocrisy on display is completely self evident. I really think CNN are on the verge of a complete meltdown at this point. They’re just lashing out blindly, trying to see what sticks in their war with Trump. There’s no logic, no planning behind any of it. it’s just hysteria at this point. Long may they continue to humiliate themselves. They deserve nothing less than complete contempt.

19657462_1128416560636377_3489594551776572152_n.jpg

Pure racism: Former ISIS fighters struggling to get jobs when they return to Europe.

Untitled
No, I’m not making this story up. This is the actual headline.

With ISIS gradually getting crushed in Syria (no thanks to America or their regional allies), being a jihadist is suddenly not so glamorous anymore for a lot of young Muslim men, who joined their ranks in recent years. A lot of them are returning to Europe, and supposedly want a second chance. They’re looking for jobs, but they can’t seem to find anyone willing to employ them, what with the big time gap in their CV, and the whole ‘fighting for a terrorist organisation’ thing hanging over their heads. This makes them sad, and a few of them have decided to share their stories with us.

From Newsweek

The first thing an employer will ask about a resume is any gaps between jobs. But they probably wouldn’t suspect that an applicant for a certain role who seems to have been unemployed for a few years was busy fighting for the Islamic State militant group (ISIS).

I can just picture the interviews now…

unnamed.jpg
“We’re sorry Muhammad, but we have no room at our organisation, for someone with your spotty employment record. I hear they’re currently recruiting for airline pilots though. Do you know how to fly a plane?”

Jihadis returning to their home countries in Europe are now finding out the hard way, and many cannot get a job as they try to reintegrate into western society.

“Jihadis”

“home countries”

“Europe”.

These are three terms that should never be used in the same sentence, unless that sentence is “Jihadis have been deported back to their home countries, from Europe, were they’ll hopefully soon be killed by the Russian military.”

Swedish daily newspaper Expressen interviewed former jihadis about life after ISIS and they discussed the challenges of finding work. As many as 150 have returned to the Scandinavian country to try and rebuild their lives.

Oh what a surprise. Sweden are the ones leading the charge to humanise these worthless sub-human scum. They don’t deserve the chance to rebuild their  pathetic lives. They deserve to be exterminated with extreme prejudice.

b4813aff2136b47130fd5555ae3fcc4d--vlad-the-impaler-fascinating-facts.jpg
Vlad the Impaler figured out the correct way to treat Jihadis, more than 500 years ago.

“I just want to forget everything,” Walad Yousef, a 27-year-old returning fighter, told the newspaper. “I apply for a lot of jobs, but I can’t get any because my pictures are out there.”

Shouldn’t have run off to fight for an organisation that regularly beheads people, commits acts of terrorism in Western countries, including your host nation, throws gay people off rooftops, and takes women as sex slaves then, should you Walad? I’ve no sympathy for you whatsoever. Don’t act as if you didn’t know what you were getting yourself into, when you signed up to fight for those monsters. They don’t even try to hide what they’re all about. You deserve no opportunities and in a sane world (so not Sweden then), you would be arrested, flown back to whichever Islamic hellhole you originally came from, and dropped out of the plane without any parachute. It’s pretty obvious to anyone with common sense (so again, nobody with any power in Sweden), that he probably came back just so he can commit an act of terrorism there.

Yousef had posted images of himself in Syria on Facebook, posing at a training camp with a Kalashnikov, and encouraging friends to join him. He returned to Sweden and said he had only gone to Syria to help civilians in the eastern city of Raqqa, where ISIS has beheaded several western hostages.

The idiot Swedish authorities will probably fall for this obvious lie.

2B5C28E200000578-0-image-a-2_1439555792851
Here’s a picture of Yousef trying to rescue a suicidal man who blindfolded himself, tied his own hands behind his back, and then jumped off a roof. Unfortunately, he couldn’t get there in time to save him.
jihadijj.png
Here’s a picture of Yousef showing his favourite knife to a very short man.

Another returning member said that life under ISIS was “not what I thought” while others said they had only traveled to help civilians affected by the Syrian war.

bullshit-meter.jpg

Employers fear that returning fighters may commit attacks or help others to commit attacks and do not wish to be associated with them, said another returnee who has changed his name to Yousef.

Oh what horrible hate filled bigots those employers must be. How is it that in *current year*, there are still bigots out there, who think it’s perfectly acceptable to discriminate against members of a terrorist organisation?

download.jpg
“Why do they discriminate against us? All we wanted to do was install a global Caliphate, murder the infidels, and enslave their women and children. We’re such victims.”

“You in the media have scared them. I do not know why they are afraid,” said a jihadi from the southern city of Malmo of the fears that employees and civilians had of returning foreign fighters.

Gee, I wonder why people would be afraid of returning jihadists?

maxresdefault
I just can’t figure it out.

Another refused to speak to Expressen and give his real identity as he said he has “enough problems” finding employment in the country.

Maybe your old employer ISIS, might take you back. With all the casualties they’re suffering as of late, I’m sure they’ll be happy to take whatever recruits they can get.

Others said they had no idea why their names were on leaked ISIS records. “That’s very strange. Anyone can say they’re me,” said an unnamed returnee. “I mean, it’s war. Maybe someone recommended me. I don’t know.”

bullshit-meter

Many live at home with their relatives or their friends as they cannot afford accommodation after returning and many have changed their names.

Just as well facial recognition software is improving all the time. You can’t hide forever. You will be exposed eventually.

One of the jihadis named in the Expressen investigation is Bherlin Dequilla Gildo, a 39-year-old from Malmo, a jihadi who posed with the corpse of a Syrian regime soldier. A man answered at his address but said no one was there with that name. But he is back in Sweden, the newspaper says. One of Gildo’s associates who fought alongside him said “he can do anything. Even I am afraid of him.” 

And this guy is walking the streets of Sweden quite freely. Aren’t open borders and multiculturalism just wonderful?

Sweden is one the best countries for a foreign fighter to return if they want to reintegrate. It is trialling a rehabilitation programme that gives Swedish extremists housing, employment, education and financial support. Anna Sjöstrand, the municipal coordinator against violent extremism in the city of Lund, said in October 2016 that it is much cheaper to reintegrate someone than to abandon them.

A lot of free stuff and opportunities that indigenous, law abiding, ethnic Swedes, the ones who actually pay the taxes to fun these programs, don’t get to benefit from. This is something that people need to remember. If you’re a native European (particularly in the likes of Sweden), you’re almost guaranteed to be a second class citizen in your own country, whereas terrorist scum like these guys, will get every opportunity handed to them.

It is unclear if the trial will be rolled out nationwide or how former jihadis are to be reintegrated into the job market when they face such an obvious stigma after being ISIS members.

My guess is that the Swedish government will either incentivise or force employers to hire former ISIS fighters, ahead of native Swedes. In fact, because this is Sweden we’re talking about, I can say that with 99% certainty that this is exactly what will happen.

unnamed
“So Muhammad, I see you’re back again. The government says that we have to hire you, so welcome aboard. I’m sure you’ll make a great security guard for this vulnerable women’s shelter.”

The country suffered only its second radical Islamist attack in April when an Uzbek national plowed a truck into civilians on a busy shopping street in central Stockholm. The attack left five people dead. Authorities arrested the driver and said he had sympathies with ISIS. ISIS did not claim the attack, but it generally does not take responsibility for attackers who are captured alive.

Returning fighters are a problem across the West—security services in Europe and the U.S. are concerned that their nationals will return home to carry out attacks as ISIS’s caliphate continues to crumble in Iraq and Syria.

And here in lies a very important key problem with regards to Western policy. On the one hand, they (claim at least to) increase their attacks on ISIS in the Middle East, ostensibly to stop attacks from ISIS in Europe. Yet at the same time, they have this belief that increasing their pressure on ISIS in the Middle East, causes them to increase their attacks in the West. So a terrorist attack occurs in Europe, and they respond by bombing the Middle East, which they also believe causes more attacks in Europe in retaliation. Meanwhile, they continue to do nothing practical to prevent attacks from happening in Europe, such as having a sensible immigration policy, or deporting known radicals. It’s like imagine if your house was full of cockroaches, so you hired an exterminator, to kill the cockroaches in a house 5 miles away, instead of the ones actually in your own home. It’s just complete insanity.

More than half of Britain’s 800 foreign fighters have returned home. For the U.S., only a few have returned home with a much lower travel rate to Syria and Iraq. Former FBI Director James Comey said in 2016 that just 250 Americans had attempted to go or have gone to Syria. Almost 7,000 have traveled to Iraq and Syria as a whole from the West.

Is anyone else sick of hearing these people actually being referred to as “British” or “American” or whatever? Because I sure am. It isn’t white Europeans or white Americans… the people who actually built these nations, who are going off to Syria and Iraq (well, with one notable exception). It’s people of Arabic, North African, or South Asian descent who are doing so. These are not the indigenous Europeans, nor are they founding demographic of the United States. They are people who we have foolishly welcomed into our homelands, who have taken advantage of our kindness, and then have betrayed us. They aren’t American. They aren’t European. They shouldn’t be referred to as such.

Trump gets his travel ban, finally.

Finally a bit of good news from America. After endless attempts from lower courts to derail this policy, that I would regard as both “common sense” and “not extensive enough”, the US Supreme Court has finally ruled that Trump’s so called “Muslim ban” (ie, a temporary ban on immigration from 6 countries that just happen to be Muslim majority, and which are considered to be potential terrorist hotspots), is in fact constitutional.

trumpgrin.jpg

From The Journal

THE US SUPREME Court is letting the Trump administration enforce most of its 90-day ban on travellers from six Muslim-majority countries, overturning lower court orders that blocked it.

Just for the record, I think it’s absolute insanity that it even had to go this far. I think it’s absurd that the elected President can have his orders overruled by any random judge in the country, even in the lowest of courts. I do understand that there needs to be some way to keep in line and to make sure that he doesn’t violate the constitution with his orders, but the Supreme Court alone should be the one court with the power to do so.

The action today is a victory for President Donald Trump in the biggest legal controversy of his presidency to date.

Controversial… even though a small majority of US citizens actually support the ban. In fact, a higher percentage of US citizens support the ban, than support Trump himself. The only reason this became such a controversy, was because of a vocal minority of lunatics complaining about it, and getting a platform to do so, from the treacherous mainstream media. The majority of people have seen the consequences that mass immigration from the Muslim world has had on Europe, and don’t want to see a similar epidemic of rapes, child grooming, acid attacks, terrorism, etc., to happen in America as well.

Gra.jpg
Why would Americans want to import this…
france-paris-shootings.jpg
… or this…
taharrush
…or this…

Or this?

The court did leave one category of foreigners protected, those “with a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States”, the court said in an unsigned opinion. The justices will hear arguments in the case in October.

And here’s hoping they’ll decide in October that the original ban wasn’t extensive enough, and start including other countries, particularly Saudi Arabia.

A number of groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have sharply criticised the ban, saying it unfairly targets Muslims.

No, because there are plenty of Muslim majority countries in the world, including some of the most populous ones, such as Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria etc, which aren’t included in the ban, and non-Muslim minorities living in the targeted countries, are also subject to the ban. Doesn’t seem unfair to me and even if was, does anybody honestly care? The American people have their own needs, and those of their loved ones to worry about, and can hardly be expected to put the needs of of citizens in countries which have adversarial relationships with America, ahead of their own.

Trump said last week that the ban would take effect 72 hours after being cleared by courts.

The anticipation is killing me.

The ban would apply to citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Please add more.

The Trump administration said the ban was needed to allow an internal review of the screening procedures for visa applicants from those countries. That review should be complete before 2 October, the first day the justices could hear arguments in their new term.

Why is this unreasonable again?

A reversal of roles for a change.

19400021_941178272686735_1058075634322547740_n.jpg
This hypocritical idiot doesn’t realise that he would be thrown off the top of a building for the lifestyle he lives, by the same people he is so desperate to defend.  This level of stupidity is exactly why the Western world is dying.

This isn’t a topic I expected to be addressing anytime soon, but it would be remiss of me and quite hypocritical, if I decided to ignore it, just because it doesn’t fit a narrative that I believe in. Apparently there has been yet another terrorist attack in Britain. Like many previous attacks, both in Britain, and in several other European countries, the weapon of choice was a motorised vehicle. However there is one key difference between this attack and all the others we’ve seen as of late. In this case, rather than a Muslim attacking a group of innocent white people, it was a white man attacking a group of innocent Muslims.

ramadan-bomb-athon-day-a-attacks-kills-terror-in-the-22543393.png
We’re going to have to update the score for “Muslims killed by Islamophobes”.
Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg
There we go. So the global score for Ramadan attacks so far is 139 to 1. Just watch as that one attack becomes the only one that matters.

I’m really not happy that this attack has taken place. Quite frankly, it accomplishes nothing, except giving ammunition to the controlled media and the drooling imbeciles who listen to them and parrot their lies, that there is somehow an epidemic of Islamophobic hate crimes, and that Muslims are the “real victims”. They finally have a new incident they can cite as an example of “white terrorism” and “Islamophobic violence”, and you can be sure that even a decade or so from now, they’ll still be citing it and drawing a false equivalence between it, and each of the dozens of Islamic terror attacks that will inevitably happen in the same time period.

web-Breivik-gesture-2016.jpg
Sure, they still bring up Anders Breivik, all these years later.

At the same time, a part of me isn’t really surprised that this has finally happened. I mean, how much longer could the things that have been happening go on the way they were? There’s been a near constant spate of Muslim on non-Muslim violence in Europe for the past few years, and Britain itself saw three major attacks occur within the space of three months. That’s not even taking into account the huge number of Muslim grooming gangs that have been raping white English girls for the past few decades, or any other violent crimes that they have committed against the native Brits. The police have failed miserably, to protect people. The media has tried to cover things up and downplay the significance of what is happening. The political establishment has ignored the problem and has continued to pursue policies that only make the problem worse. Can anyone really be surprised that after all this has been going on, that finally someone would snap and lash out in retaliation?

Just to be clear, I am not in any way condoning what happened. As I already said, this doesn’t do us any favours and I really wish that it didn’t happen. At the same time, I don’t think those of us who are speaking up about this problem have anything to apologise for. All we’re doing is drawing attention to what is happening. Much like the victims of every other terrorists attack that has occurred, these innocent Muslims are victims of the failed multicultural project, that has been forced on European nations against the collective will of the populace already living there. I can only hope that there won’t be an escalation of violence because of this, but I’m far too cynical to expect that this will be the case. I can’t see this situation ending well at all.