The insanity behind the Libyan slave markets.

I’ve noticed recently that a lot of “normies” on social media, have finally caught up on something that those of us who have been paying attention, have been aware of for quite some time already. That is, they’ve finally become aware of the existence of slave markets operating quite openly in Libya, and in typical normie fashion, are virtue signalling about how “appalled” and “outraged” they are, and about how “something needs to be done” about it. Of course, as is to be expected, none of them seem to show any indication that they care to educate themselves as to “how and why” this whole thing has come about in the first place. They just care about how they can exploit it to present themselves as good and virtuous people, who “care” about their fellow human beings.

This+isnt+and+never+was+virtue+signalling+so+you+can+_e03d542cb1e07543f2325e5eba82e7e0.jpg

To really understand what has been going on in this world is to acknowledge the self evident reality of the following statement. Everything of significance that is taking place in the world, when looked at from a purely logical perspective, is completely insane. The events that led up to, and the reaction following the revelation of these Libyan slave markets, is no exception to this rule.

Lets really analyse what actually happened. In October 2011, Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, was overthrown after an 8 month long “civil war”, and after having ruled the country for more than 40 years. I use the term “civil war” quite loosely, because in general, a “civil war” refers to a war between citizens of the same country. In the case of Libya, much like in Syria (and which I covered in detail about a year ago), it wasn’t so much a war between fellow citizens, as it was a war between the legitimate Libyan government, and a bunch of terrorists and mercenaries, armed, trained, and financed, by foreign powers which were at odds with the Libyan government, led by NATO.

So the question then becomes, “why were these foreign powers against Gaddafi’s rule?”. The official reason given of course was that Gaddafi was a brutal monster who was oppressing his people and that he needed to be eliminated, so that democracy could be installed. Does that sound familiar? It’s pretty much the same narrative they’ve used with Assad in Syria, or a decade earlier with Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the latter of which, they supported in the 1980s btw when he was fighting against their arch-nemesis, Iran. I guess it doesn’t matter how brutal a dictator someone is, when he’s useful to them. It only becomes a problem when he’s no longer useful. But then again, as I’ve stated time and time again, this is completely obvious, just from looking at the undying support that the West gives to Saudi Arabia, arguably the most barbaric regime on the planet.

CT563YoUkAASjOy
Such a great and trusted ally.

The thing is, I’m not even denying that Gaddafi was a dictator, or that democracy was lacking in Libya. What I am saying is that the Western elites, their puppet politicians, and the controlled mainstream media which pushes their agendas with their propaganda, don’t actually care about any of this. If they did, they would never support a country like Saudi Arabia, nor would they have supported Saddam Hussein in the 1980s, just because he was useful at the time. They just cynically use the “we’re liberating the ordinary people and bringing democracy” narrative, as an excuse to push wars and regime changes that promote their real agendas, because they’re smart enough to know that if the general public knew what the real reasons were for these constant wars, they would never support them.

So in regards to Libya specifically, what was the agenda? There are various different agendas that are the motivating factor for actions in the world at any given time, but with Libya specifically, it was opposition (most notably in the US and France) to Gaddafi’s proposal to create a gold backed currency, which would have helped the African people, and threatened the supremacy of the US Dollar and the Euro. That is why he had to go, and that is why people like Hillary Clinton were so happy when he was gone.

Before the war, Libyan people were for the most part, quite well looked after by the Gaddafi regime. Free healthcare, education, electricity, etc. That’s not to say that the country was some kind of paradise on Earth. I have heard it suggested that the standards of healthcare and education were quite poor, and that many of the other entitlements that Libyan citizens could avail of, such as the $50,000 grant given to newlyweds to help them start a family, were a bureaucratic nightmare to claim, but the point is, they existed. Compare the failed state that exists now, were terrorists control large territories, and slave markets exist out in the open, to the country that existed under Gaddafi and ask yourself honestly. Did the Western intervention in the country really improve things?

After Gaddafi’s defeat, and Libya’s descent into failed state status, what has been described as the “biggest refugee crisis since WW2” kicked off. Of course as I’ve mentioned more times than I count, it isn’t technically a refugee crisis, as the vast majority of the so called “refugees” aren’t coming to Europe to escape danger, but instead, coming for economic reasons. Gaddafi himself even warned us that this would happen if he was taken out.

DBgfumuXYAUqW1i.jpg
We should have listened.

So these people were attempting to get into Europe anyway, long before the Libyan and Syrian civil wars, but Gaddafi’s regime had always kept them out. However, these wars then became an excuse to justify these migrations, and Angela Merkel only encouraged it further, with her blanket invitation to the entire third world to come live in Europe. The consequences of this migrant crisis have included, but are not limited to:

  • Migrants drowning en route to Europe.
  • Migrants getting enslaved.
  • European women getting raped en masse by migrants who do make it to Europe.
  • Huge riots involving migrants.
  • A massive financial and political strain on the countries dealing with the migrants the most.

So just think about what has happened, what we’ve been told in the media, what we can see going on with our own eyes, and remember my earlier statement in this article in which I said…

“Everything of significance that is taking place in the world, when looked at from a purely logical perspective, is completely insane.”

  • The US and their NATO allies, are aligned with Saudi Arabia, but at the same time, claim they took out Gaddafi because he was a brutal dictator who oppressed his people.
  • Libya went from having some of the best living standards in Africa, to being a failed state because of this, and a country were slavery is practiced openly.
  • Those involved actually try to claim with a straight face, that this was done for the benefit of the Libyan people, and that they’re somehow better off now than they were living under Gaddafi with their free education, healthcare, electricity, etc.
  • Hillary Clinton was heavily involved in causing this, and celebrated what happened, yet was promoted by the media as someone fit to be President of the most powerful country in the world.
  • Obama was in power at the time that it did happen, and his administration (which included Hillary) was largely responsible for what happened. The media treats Obama like a saint, who is above all criticism.
  • Angela Merkel invites the entire third world to come to Europe, which encourages them to make the perilous journey, and results in people either drowning, getting enslaved, or if they do make it, become a heavily resented burden for the ordinary European people. The media celebrates Merkel as a great leader, even declaring her the “leader of the free world”, in light of Trump’s presidential victory.
  • Normies have no understanding of what is actually going on and continue to demand “more refugees” be let into Europe, even though they aren’t fleeing from danger, but are instead fleeing TO danger, by ending up in a situation were there is a good chance they’ll either end up enslaved, or drowned. Normies think they’re doing good by voicing their support like this.
  • These same normies who are so vehemently opposed to what is going on in Libya currently, also tend to support people like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who are responsible for causing the mess in the first place, and are either too ignorant to the facts, or too hypocritical to care.

So when you really look at what has happened, how the media tries to spin things, and how normal people react to things, then is it not clear?

THIS IS ALL COMPLETELY INSANE!!!!

Advertisements

“Europe ‘needs’ migrants to survive”

I really feel as if the time period that we’re living in now is the kind of time period were events of significant historical relevance are unfolding in real time. This is a time period that historians will study in detail. That numerous books will be written about. That children will study in school, etc. Or at least, that would be the case, except for one thing. In order for that to happen, there would have to actually be a future, something I find myself doubtful about. How can we expect historians to study the time period that will be known as “The Death of Western Civilisation”, when the rest of the world will inevitably die with it? Because when the architects of Western civilisation are inevitably replaced by people who have proven themselves incapable of ever building a civilisation of their own, then how can we expect the very concept of civilisation itself to survive?

From Politico

The European Union needs to “create legal ways” for migrants to come to Europe as the Continent “will clearly need immigration in the coming decades,” European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said in an interview published Tuesday.

You heard it right there folks. Even though an estimated 800 million jobs will be lost to automation by the year 2030 , the EU will still apparently need immigration from the kind of migrants who will only ever be capable of doing the kinds of jobs that are most likely to be made obsolete in the near future. Lets not fool ourselves. These aren’t doctors, engineers, and computer programmers that are flooding into the continent. The majority of them are illiterate in their own languages, let alone, the languages of the countries they are arriving in.  There’s not a chance in hell that these people will ever be able to contribute in any real way. Why exactly does Europe “need” people doomed to a life on welfare, in order to survive?

190-captain-phillips
Without these low IQ retards to live on welfare, Europe will not survive apparently.

“We have to provide those who want to come and are able to come, and whose situation makes it possible for them to come, with legal paths to get to Europe,” Juncker told German broadcaster Deutsche Welle. “I believe that if we don’t offer legal ways of emigrating to Europe, and immigrating within Europe, we will be lost.”

Notice how he doesn’t actually explain why exactly he thinks Europe will be lost, without mass third world immigration? He just wants us to take him at his word. Funny isn’t it how Europe not only survived, but thrived for centuries without mass third world immigration, but now it’s apparently an issue for some vague and unexplained reason.

Juncker also said that if migrants “who are, generally speaking, the poor and needy, are no longer able to enter the house of Europe through the front door, they’ll keep making their way in through the back windows.”

See? He isn’t even bothering with the “they’re refugees fleeing war” narrative anymore. A narrative I pointed out was bullshit at least two and a half years ago. They always were just economic migrants coming to Europe for a better life, at our expense. Can anyone give any justification for why European people should put up with the increase in rapes, terrorism, riots, financial burdens, etc., that these people bring with them, when it has been outright admitted that they’re coming here purely for economic reasons. How can anyone reasonably justify this?

The Commission president also said he was shocked by reports from Libya of people being sold as slaves.

LOL, who could have possibly predicted that North African Muslims, would ever engage in slavery?

ARABS AND SLAVERYbarbary-slave-tradecaptured-victims-barbary-coastimage-127main-qimg-1a1f5387e90d32b3966903457a72eafb-cmain-qimg-5a752cf091ebf367ee9d84ef77b2ad3d-cmanhuntmaxresdefaultwhite-slaves

I guess this guy never heard of the Barbary Slave Trade, which wasn’t stopped until Europeans put an end to it. All that’s happening now is that they’re going back to their normal ways. Oh and the Barbary Slavers took European slaves too btw. You can be sure that these modern successors will do the same thing as well, if ever they get the opportunity.

“I can’t sleep easy when I think about what’s happening to those people who went to Libya to try and improve their lives, only to find themselves in hell,” Juncker said.

I personally have no sympathy at all for them. After seeing what the ones who do successfully make it to Europe have done when they’ve gotten here…

…I’m really finding it hard to sympathise with them for “finding themselves in hell”. They willingly chose to leave their countries, hoping to invade Europe and live off the productivity of the European people. They got themselves into this mess because of their own greed and idiocy, so I don’t care what happens to them.

This week, the fifth African Union-EU Summit takes place in Ivory Coast, at which leaders from the two continents will discuss the issue of migration from Africa to Europe.

They won’t ask the ordinary native European people what we want done of course. They’ll just make their own decision on the matter and force it on the rest of us, regardless of how we feel.

“The Irish flag could offend people.”

More than two and a half years ago, I wrote a post, about how there were apparently plans to display Irish flags in every Irish primary school class. At the time I predicted a possibility that this would eventually be considered “offensive” to foreign students and that there would be calls to remove the flags. Well I never found out if this ended up being the case. However, I did just hear that apparently a local Dublin Councillor has come to a similar conclusion about displaying the Irish flag on top of the council building.

the-enemy-within

From Dublin Live

A Fingal County councillor has warned against flying the Irish flag outside County Hall, saying the move could offend foreign nationals living there.

Is the sheer idiocy of the statement not completely self-evident? If there really are people who find symbols of our country so offensive, then why are they even in the country?

At a meeting of the council, Solidarity-People Before Profit’s Matthew Waine opposed a motion proposed by Sinn Fein’s Daire Ni Laoi to hoist the national flag at the council’s HQ in Swords.

download
I hope this guy does not get re-elected.

Don’t vote for this crowd, fellow Irish people. I can’t blame you for feeling disillusioned with the major establishment parties. I completely agree with you there. But if you must vote for something different, please throw your support behind a different party than this one. They need to understand that we will not tolerate this blatant disrespect for our culture and our heritage.

The councillor was one of just two who voted against the motion, suggesting that the red flag of Marxism and socialism should be flown instead.

“The Irish tricolour which represents Irish culture might be offensive to foreign nationals.”

feature-hurling.png
Offensive
image
Offensive
Gaelic-culture1MI
Offensive
Irish-Culture.jpg
Offensive

 

“The red flag of Marxism, a flag which represents an ideology under which tens to hundreds of millions were brutally enslaved, tortured and murdered, won’t be offensive”.

A8953DD5-8FB0-400E-9E21-71DED66EC1BF_w1023_s
Not offensive
jewcommo
Not offensive
65396708e01162d474b2ddd284dbd30d--photo-manipulation-nd-amendment
Not offensive
skulls-1024x646
Not offensive

 

Councillor Waine said: “We have one of the most multi-cultural populations in the whole country living in Fingal and I think we need to consider the sensitivity of this.

Yes it’s so insensitive subjecting them to the sight of the flag of a country they willingly chose to immigrate to. Thank you Comra… er I mean “Councillor”, for being our moral compass.

“The issue of religion, language, nationality…all of those issues are extremely sensitive and we’ve seen how that can play out to divide people.

This is what the left always do. They always project. He talks about certain issues being used to divide people, when that is exactly what he is doing right here, with his implication that our national flag is divisive. There wouldn’t be an issue if not for people like him making an issue out of nothing.

“I would prefer to see the flagpoles used to express solidarity, so for example on the week of Pride we should show the Rainbow flag.

Instead of displaying a flag which is representative of the Irish people as a whole, lets display a flag which is representative of a small minority.

“I think we should fly the flags of minority groups like Pavee Point. I come from the tradition of the workers’ movement which doesn’t see the country of your birth as being anything significant.

“I would prefer to see the red flag fly outside County Hall and maybe in the future that will be the case.”

“Because I have certain beliefs about nationality being unimportant, I think they should take precedence, over the beliefs of everyone else. I don’t care if patriotism and national identity are important to other people. What I think is what matters.”

tumblr_static_tumblr_static_8042lpmratk4gko0scko44c4k_640
Enter a caption

His view was supported by Independent Councillor David O’Connor who said: “You’re saying what a lot of people think.”

And a lot more people than that, think that he’s talking complete crap.

2015-06-30_fin_10700295_I1
Another one to avoid voting for.

Councillor Brian Dennehy (FG) also said he understood where Councillor Waine was coming from, because he said flags could be “used as a wedge to divide people”.

A pathetic wimp trying to sit on the fence, instead of taking a solid stance one way or the other.

2017-01-31_fin_28113390_I1
For your cowardly refusal to take a principled stance one way or another, I declare you untrustworthy, and wouldn’t recommend a vote for you either.

But Fianna Fail’s Darragh Butler said: “I think it’s staggering that a councillor should say we shouldn’t fly our national flag, or hide our own flag away.”

No love for Fianna Fail on my part, but I gotta give credit where credit is due. Fair play Councillor Darragh Butler, for telling this prick exactly what all sane Irish people think.

Darragh-Butler.jpg
In recognition of his respect for our culture, I hereby call for Cllr Darragh Butler, to be named as the new leader of Fianna Fail.

Independent councillor Jimmy Guerin said: “I take offence at the comments of Cllr Waine. I’m not surprised at him.”

image (1)
Another champion of Irish culture. I hope this guy gets re-elected.

Councillor Ni Laoi said: “I’d love to see the national flag flying from the turrets of Malahide Castle and Swords Castle and Ardgillen, but for now I’m just proposing that this flag, this symbol of tolerance, inclusion and respect, be flown outside County Hall.”

I completely agree with this. It should be flown everywhere.

After a lengthy debate in the council chamber, with the majority of members supporting the proposal, the motion was carried by 34 votes to two.

Thankfully, our country hasn’t gone completely insane just yet. However this does worry me. It always starts off slowly, and in such a way that we ridicule it, much like we are now. But these monsters are relentless. They don’t ever give up. They only make tactical retreats until they’re ready to try again. I doubt this will be the last we hear of this. I’m certain either he, or one of his comrades will try something like this again. We must never ever give them anything. The more we give them, the further they’ll push. We must always remain vigilant and treat these people with the same contempt, that they treat us through their disrespect for our culture. They deserve nothing less.

France is finished.

There are a lot of countries in the Western world competing in the race to be the first to commit national suicide. There’s the United Kingdom. There’s Belgium. There’s Germany. There’s Canada. Then of course, there’s my own personal pick to win, Sweden. However there are occasionally times when I question if Sweden really is the front-runner in the race. Don’t get me wrong, that doesn’t happen very often. Usually whenever I start to doubt Sweden’s commitment to destroying itself the quickest, they manage to outdo themselves, and remind me as to why they’re my pick. However, after reading this latest story from France, another top contender in this race, I’m really considering the possibility that I may have put my money on them to win (if you can really call it “winning”) instead.

if_charles_martel_was_a_leftist_by_rochambeaufr-d9p70r6
The real Charles Martel must be spinning in his grave, seeing what has become of his descendants, in the land he fought to protect.

From Israel National News

A French professor has suggested creating a Muslim state within France in order to prevent a civil war, reports Westmonster.

This is basically a surrender, exactly what the French are infamous for. He’s outright admitting that the multicultural plan has failed miserably, by making this statement.

Professor Christian de Moliner admits that an independent society has formed within France, which he described as: “A branch that wants to settle their lives on religious values and is fundamentally opposed to the liberal consensus on which our country was founded.

And the obvious answer to this problem would be to discontinue immigration from the kinds of people who make up this “independent society”, and then round up the ones already in the country, and deport them to a country better suited for their ideology. But of course we can’t do that, or people might call us names, and as we all know, being called names is far worse than having our homelands stolen from us.

Burka-Barbarians
If you think people like this have no place in France, you’re a “racist”.

“We can never convert the 30% of Muslims who demand the introduction of sharia law to the merits of our democracy and secularism.

“But we also can’t deport them to a country which practices Sharia law, because that would be barbaric.”

aca60c9b26f0ee75816290e302e6a407
It would be wrong to send people who want Sharia law, to a country which has Sharia law, as by an astonishing coincidence, these countries are all shitholes. The only solution would be to create a Sharia state within our own country, so that they could have Sharia law here.

“We are now allowing segregation to take place that does not say its name. Rather than veil the face or adopt unimaginable measures in democracy (remigration, forced evictions of the most radical), why not establish a dual system of law in France?”

He literally said that deporting cultural aliens back to their countries of origin, no matter how radical they are in their beliefs, is “unimaginable”. Can you see why I’m seriously considering that France may be overtaking Sweden in this race to national suicide?

De Moliner writes that Emmanuel Macron’s Presidential election victory will not solve the problems, but will only postpone them.

Should have voted for Le Pen when you had the chance.

20170826_euc522
LOL, his approval rating is dropping even quicker than Hollande’s did in the same amount of time. You remember Hollande, right? That was the guy who had a 4% approval rating by the end of his term.

“We will never be able to eradicate the radical Islamism,” he says, adding: “While we are not yet at open war, the faithful of the Prophet are already regrouping in areas sometimes governed by special rules.”

They’re waiting for the demographic balance to shift in their favour, before they go to open war. Seeing as their birthrates are higher than that of the native French population, it’s only a matter of time. Once there are enough of them, the open war will begin.

His “solution” is to create a “state inspired by colonial Algeria and Mayotte of the twentieth century: one territory, one government, but two peoples: the French with the usual laws and Muslims with Qur’anic status (but only for those who choose it).

Brilliant idea. Model your modern, democratic, technologically advanced society, on a backward colony from a century ago.

“The latter will have the right to vote unlike the natives of colonial Algeria, but they will apply Sharia in everyday life, to regulate matrimonial laws (which will legalize polygamy) and inheritance.

“They will no longer apply to French judges for disputes between Muslims, but to Qadis. On the other hand, conflicts between Christians and believers will remain the responsibility of ordinary courts.

It’s not just “multiculturalism” now, but “multilegalism” as well. One law for the French. Another law for the Muslim invaders. I wonder will they go ahead and legalise the right for them to throw gay people off of roofs and take sex slaves, seeing as this would be in line with their beliefs?

dmvidpics-2016-04-07-at-19-43-20.png
Picture from the Eiffel tower circa 2020.

“This system would involve schools or hospitals reserved for believers and therefore the creation of local committees that will manage them independently. A council of ulemas will fix the religious law, but the autonomy will stop there,” de Moliner hopes.

“It is obviously out of the question that an embryonic Muslim government is settling in France.

“But instead of doing the sensible thing of nipping it in the bud by removing these people before they have the chance to take over, we’re just going to willingly surrender a large chunk of our territory to them. Anything else would be wrong.”

“This system worked without too many problems from 1890 to 1940 in Algeria.”

Isn’t that great, French people? Instead of living in 21st century France, you get to live in 1890-1940 Algeria instead. Doesn’t that sound exciting?

14584790389_c720b3429c_b

463928873.jpg

ca2e5f866e71e9b88bf4f3f9258c5539--old-city-eye-art

SCVIEW490249

market-scene-sidi-okba-algeria-photochrome-print-circa-1900-FW6AE2.jpg

street-scene-in-tolga-biskra-province-algeria-date-circa-1920-K07R7J

RIP France.

Syria finally defeats ISIS

kjnkj
That face when you’ve finally crushed your enemies successfully.

There’s some fantastic news in regards to the Syrian civil war which has been taking place for the past 5 years and seemed as if it would never end. The forces of good, the Syrian government and their Russian and Iranian allies have finally succeeded in crushing the remaining ISIS opposition and driving them out of their last stronghold within Syrian and Iraqi territory. This is wonderful news, except for those who profit off of human misery and death.

From CBC

Islamic State militants withdrew Thursday from their last stronghold in Syria, a strategic town near the border with Iraq, following a government offensive that has effectively left the extremist group’s fighters dispersed in villages and small towns in the desert.

The Syrian military declared the town liberated after intense battles that killed a large number of militants, including leaders. The military said they are still chasing other ISIS militants in different directions in the desert.

“The liberation of Boukamal is of great importance because it is a declaration of the fall of this group’s project in the region generally and the collapse of its supporters’ illusions to divide it, control large parts of the Syria-Iraq borders and secure supply routes between the two countries,” Army spokesperson Gen. Ali Mayhoub said in a televised statement.

Syrian pro-government media said Syrian troops had clashed with remnants of ISIS militants in the town after they entered it late Wednesday. On Thursday, they reported the town clear of ISIS fighters.

Pro-Syrian media reported the town was liberated. Al-Ikhbariya TV’s journalist reported from the road to the town, joyfully breaking out on camera: “Daesh is finished. Live.”

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said government forces and allied troops, including Iraqi forces who linked from across the border, are combing through Boukamal after ISIS militants withdrew.

With the collapse of ISIS in Boukamal, Islamic State militants have no major territorial control in Syria and Iraq and are believed to have dispersed in the desert west and east of the Euphrates River. U.S. officials estimated that there were between 2,500 and 3,500 ISIS militants around Boukamal and that leading members of the group were also believed to have taken refuge in the town. The group has a small presence near the capital Damascus.

ISIS has suffered consecutive defeats at the hands of separate but simultaneous offensives in Iraq and Syria by the Russian-backed Syrian forces and allied militias as well as U.S.-backed Iraqi and Syrian fighters.

Despite its fall, the group’s media apparatus has remained active and its fighters are likely to keep up their insurgency from desert areas.

The swift fall of Boukamal in eastern Deir el-Zour province was accelerated after Iraqi forces seized Qaim, the town across the border last weekend, also controlling a strategic crossing between the two countries.

Iraqi militia forces participate

A senior Iraqi official said there was an agreement Tuesday to send Iraqi paramilitaries to Syria to take part in the Boukamal operation, adding that the Syrians were to supply them with weapons and gear. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to reporters.

An Iraqi spokesperson for the Popular Mobilization Forces has told The Associated Press last week that his forces, which are part of the Iraqi security forces, will participate in the operation and will head north to protect the borders and secure the road from Iran to Lebanon.

Boukamal is the last urban centre for the militants in both Iraq and Syria where Syrian troops — backed by Russia and Iranian-supported militias — and U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces are vying for control of the strategic border town.

Washington is wary of increasing Iran influence in the area and has backed the SDF in their bid to uproot ISIS from the borders with Iraq. The proximity of forces in the area has raised concerns about potential clashes between them as they approach Boukamal from opposite sides of the Euphrates River, and now from across the border with Iraq.

It was not clear if the government seizure of the town means the end of the race for control of territory previously held by ISIS.

So far the Kurdish-led Syria Democratic Forces have focused on the area east of the Euphrates, seizing a number of oil and gas fields and securing large swathes of areas along the border with Iraq, as well as the newly liberated Raqqa city.

So it seems that there are still some jihadists in Syria, who have managed to evade capture or death so far. Personally, I’m really hoping that the Syrian military hunts them down like vermin and brutally exterminates them before they have the chance to flee to Europe, for example to Sweden…

sweden

sweden1

sweden2

…Or perhaps to the UK…

UK

UK

UK

…where they’ll be treated far better than they deserve.

Also, doesn’t this mean that there’s no longer any excuse for this so called “refugee crisis” that has been destroying Europe the past few years? The story we were fed was that there was a war in Syria that people were desperately fleeing for their lives from, and this is why the entirety of the population of the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and South Asia, were flooding into Europe.

905475-image-fournie-par-la-croix-rouge-italienne-de-migrants-secourus-au-large-de-la-libye-le-18-aout-2016
These young, strong, African men, were just trying to flee the Syrian civil war, which apparently spread to their homelands as well, and which doesn’t seem to harm women, children, or the elderly.

Of course we all know that this story was complete crap right from the beginning. The “refugee crisis” was always about destroying the homogeneity of European nation states, and the Syrian civil war, along with the chaos in Libya following the fall of Gaddafi’s regime, was just a convenient excuse to justify it. I was pointing this obvious reality out at least two and half years ago.  The real goal is, and always has been, about implementing the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan, but if they were to come out and admit that and what it involves (nothing less than the ethnic cleansing of the indigenous European peoples), it would be resisted. So they prey on people’s altruism towards “suffering refugees” and create a false consensus in the media that the majority of people in Europe support helping them (even in situations were it’s blatantly obvious that they’re just economic migrants coming from countries far away from any warzone), and because the majority of people are politically correct cowards who don’t want to commit “wrongthink”, they go along with the narrative, and don’t resist their own ethnic cleansing.

Now that ISIS is effectively defeated and the Syrian Civil war is practically over, that justification no longer exists. But do I believe the current migrant crisis is going to come to an end because of this? Nope, absolutely not, because it was never about the Syrian civil war. More likely, I reckon they’ll just look for another excuse to justify its continuation, and I’m going to make a prediction as to what I think that justification will be. There are a lot of problems with Saudi Arabia right now, both internally, and in regards to its relationship with Lebanon. I could easily see something major kicking off there in the near future and when that happens, that will be the new excuse given for the “worst refugee crisis that the world has seen since World War 2”. Just you watch.

 

“It’s racist for white people to mate with each other.”

DKpgKiQWAAAJaPD

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. All this talk about “white privilege”, “white supremacy”, “white racism”, etc., it isn’t motivated by a desire for justice or equality, on the part of those who speak about it. It’s purely based on a vicious and genocidal hatred towards us. They don’t want to be equals with us. They want to exterminate us, and we’ve seen perfect examples of the future in store for us in Zimbabwe since Mugabe came to power, South Africa post-apartheid, and Haiti back in 1804.

revolution-1.gif
This is what they actually want.

And then after they’ve exterminated us and there is none of us left, they’ll be standing on our graves, cursing the fact that we ever existed at all. We only have two possible options. Total victory, or total annihilation. There is no middle ground. There is no compromise. How can we possibly expect to find common ground with an enemy that wants nothing less than our complete destruction?

white-genocide-art-e1495285729759
This is an actual piece of “art” that was celebrated.

For a long time, this enemy was subtle. We’ve spent the last few decades grovelling for forgiveness for imaginary crimes, all while they have taken more and more ground in their war against us. We couldn’t see the truth because we were too busy wallowing in our own guilt and desperately trying to make amends. “Yes take my ancestral homeland. Take my resources. Blow up my countrymen. Rape my daughter. Just please don’t call me racist”, and for a long time this actually worked. However, they gradually pushed too far, too fast, and as the Brexit result, the Trump election victory, and the rising popularity of “far right” political parties all over Europe has shown, a backlash has been happening. Now our enemy is in panic mode, the mask has slipped, and rather than maintaining composure and continuing to play the long-game, they’re lashing out, and exposing themselves as the vicious, genocidal maniacs that they always were.

From New York Post

A City University of New York sociology professor reportedly said in a tweetstorm last week that “the white-nuclear family” promotes racism, prompting a backlash on social media.

There you go. This woman literally made the claim that the “white-nuclear family promotes racism”. In other words, she’s saying it’s wrong for white people to marry other white people and to have white children together, because this is racist. She’s literally saying that our continued existence is racist. Therefore is it not obvious what the solution is? We have to stop existing in order to put an end to racism.

But of course, “white genocide” is just a crazy, far right conspiracy theory, that only far-right, Neo-Nazi, white supremacists, believe in. It doesn’t matter that it’s blatantly out in the open. It’s still just a crazy conspiracy theory.

C0lD8DPUUAAGfe0
“Just because this is actually all happening, doesn’t mean that white genocide is real.” ~ The logic we’re expected to believe.

Jessie Daniels, described as an expert on “the Internet manifestations of racism” on her CUNY page, infuriated social media users after reportedly saying that white families promote racism by default.

They misspelled “CUNT page”.

111912_Jessie_Daniels
Jessie Daniels. Strange, she looks “white” to me. Why would this “white” woman, have such an attitude towards her “fellow white people”? Hmm, this seems suspicious.

The professor began her argument saying she learned that “the white-nuclear family is one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy,” adding that that families “reproducing white children” are “part of the problem” as they facilitate white supremacy in the country, Campus Reform reported.

White people having children promotes white supremacy. Therefore white people need to stop having children, or if they must, they should make a point of having mixed race children only. Who cares if the person they fall in love with is another white person? Who cares if they want to have children who look like them? They have to either forego reproduction, or mate with people of other races, or else Jessie Daniels will call them racist. Of course, it’s still perfectly acceptable for black people to have black children, Asian people to have Asian children, Latino people to have Latino children, etc. This rule only applies to white people.

She reportedly tweeted: “I mean, if you’re a white person who says they’re engaged in dismantling white supremacy but … you’re forming a white family (and) reproducing white children that ‘you want the best for’ – how is that helping [and] not part of the problem?”

I would ask how is it causing a problem, but we all know that we won’t actually get an answer to that question, because then she would have to admit the truth, which is that as far as she is concerned, white people existing at all is the problem.

She reportedly ended her arguement suggesting that “white people” should confront their racism and stop perpetuating inequality by leaving their homes for their children.

“Until white people are ready to confront their own family’s racism (and) participation in systemic white supremacy, it’s not getting dismantled,” she wrote. “Beyond just calling out interpersonal racism, white people who want to be engaged in the work need to ask themselves about housing wealth.”

She added: “White people: do you own your home? When you die, where’s wealth in that house going? If it’s to your children, you’re reproducing (inequality).”

Yes you horrible white people. How dare you work hard, make responsible decisions, and end up owning a home of your own? It doesn’t matter how you obtained the wealth to own that home. The fact that you own it at all is an example of “inequality”. You have no right to pass that home that you worked hard to buy, on to your own children. That wealth needs to be shared with minorities who have less, even if they only have less wealth because of their own laziness, stupidity, and general incompetence.

Don’t worry ma’am. We’ll find some guilt ridden white sucker to leave their hard-earned wealth to you, instead of their own children.

The professor locked her account in response to the criticism. Fox News reached out to the professor and the university early Tuesday and did not receive an immediate response.

She obviously wasn’t prepared to defend her statements. People like this aren’t used to talking to people. They’re used to talking at people, and when people start talking back, they can’t handle it.

Anyway, as I was saying before, I just can’t understand this mentality. Why would a “white” woman say such vicious and hateful things towards other white people? It just makes no sense to me that a “white” person could possibly hate their own race so much, to the point that they would like to see them go extinct. What could possibly be the explan…

J4tIlgB
Oh. Why am I not surprised?

EVERY!!!

Tg8o1o0.png

SINGLE!!!

fw1

TIME!!!!

6xH2f7.jpg

Rdc3jcV

Is this Britain or Sweden?

We’re all familiar by now with Sweden’s problems with regards to sexual violence. However, just because Sweden is an exceptionally bad case, it doesn’t mean that they’re going it alone. Plenty of other countries are in the process of playing catch up with them. Today’s story from the soon to be known as “United Caliphate”, really sounds like the kind of thing that would give Sweden a serious run for its money.

From Telegraph

A 17-year-old girl was sexually assaulted three times by three separate men within an hour in an “unprecedented” and gravely traumatising ordeal.

It’s truly disgusting, that it isn’t safe for young women and girls to walk home at night, without the risk of getting sexually assaulted on the way. One such attack is awful enough. The fact that this girl experienced three separate incidents, from three different men, all on a single night, is absolutely shocking. There’s always going to be scum who engage in sexual violence, no matter where you go, but this sort of thing is completely unnatural in what is supposed to be a first world, civilised society.

The teenager was walking home from a nightclub in Tower Hamlets, east London, when she was targeted by the men in quick succession.

Tower Hamlets?

Why does that term sound familiar to me?

tower
Oh, of course. Why am I not surprised?

The local authority announced on Friday that it was investing £3million to put an additional 19 officers on the streets in the crime-ridden borough after losing almost 200 officers in seven years due to government cuts.

Yes, just keep throwing money at the problem, in the hopes that it will go away, without the root cause having ever been dealt with. The crack is getting bigger, and you’re running out of paper to cover it over. You need to acknowledge the real problem, while you still have a chance to deal with it. It’s not as if people can’t see what it is. You just don’t want to admit that it’s a problem.

CV3xRu8WIAAlKUu

Police said there was absolutely no link between the “opportunistic” attacks on the teenager, two of which were described as very serious, possibly rape. The third suspect may have been part of a group.

I doubt there was any link between them at all. They just behaved in the way that comes naturally to them, and that doesn’t require any organisation or cooperation. They saw an “infidel whore” walking the streets, not dressed modestly enough for their standards, unaccompanied by any male family member, and they treated her in the same way they’d treat any other woman in such a scenario.

hqdefault

The victim, who is a student, was so deeply traumatised that her memory was affected. Officers fear she may have been drugged.

I can’t blame her for possibly repressing her memories of what happened. I only hope that if the memories do start to resurface, that she gets the help and support that she needs to get through it, rather than having to face it alone.

It is hoped that the men will be identified by CCTV images, one of whom in particular – the second suspected attacker –  is clearly pictured.

The Orwellian surveillance state might finally come in useful for something other than arresting people for so called “hate speech” on social media.

Oh wait, probably not, because whenever Muslims commit sex crimes in the UK, they usually get a slap on the wrist instead.

oxford-muslims-guilty2-e1435252399324
…and that’s why their victims didn’t matter enough to deserve real justice.

The girl’s ordeal began shortly before midnight on Friday September 29. She had spent the evening at a club with friends but became separated from them and was trying to make her way home.

She was seen on camera at around 11.55pm being carried down Cambridge Heath Road in Hackney by the first suspect.

The pair are then seen appearing to go into a doorway, after which the man, who was wearing dark clothing, is not seen again on camera. Items of the top half of the girl’s clothing were subsequently found nearby.

We’re always hearing about an alleged “rape culture” in the west, where rape is normalised and trivialised. Well I don’t think we have a homegrown one, but we’re sure in the process of establishing one right now.

Shortly after midnight, another CCTV camera captures the girl stumbling down nearby Mint Street being followed by a different man, suspect two, on a racing bike.

Police believe the bearded man followed her as she turned the corner and headed in the direction of Bethnal Green train station.

“Bearded man”

Is that really the best description they can give? Surely there are other details they can release about this guy’s physical description. Of course, we know the real reason that they won’t.

beard-41
“OK young lady. We understand that the suspect had a beard, and that’s all we have to go on. Do you think you can pick out your attacker from this line-up? Was it this man?”
images
“… or perhaps this man?”

 

wheeler1-e1443864488263.jpg
“…or maybe this man?”
santa-claus-orig
“… or perhaps this is the guy. Don’t worry, they’re behind a one-way mirror, so they can’t see you.”

 

The images indicate that the man then directed her into an area set back from the street where they remained for a period of time. The CCTV then shows the suspect walking away.

The girl, whose clothing appears dishevelled, emerges shortly afterwards and continues down Corfield Street.

Just minutes later, at around 12.45pm, detectives believe the victim was attacked a third time, possibly by two or three men.

CCTV captures a third suspect walking down the street, possibly joined by two others who can be seen in the distance under some trees.

The man appears to bend down towards a spot on the kerb, between two parked cars, and is believed to have seriously assaulted the teenager.

This level of depravity is almost hard to process as being real. A few years ago, I never would have expected to be reading something like this. But this is Europe in 2017, and if the signs are anything to go by, then 2018, 2019, 2020, etc., are only going to be even worse for this sort of thing. We’re rapidly heading to a stage were women will have to cover themselves up, and not go outside alone anymore, for their own safety, just like how it is in the Middle East and North Africa. Can anyone honestly say that they don’t think we’re heading that way? There is no magical soil in Europe, which causes people who walk on it, to adopt European values. European values were created by European people. When the European people are replaced by non-European people, our values will be replaced with us.

quote-europe-is-no-longer-europe-it-is-eurabia-a-colony-of-islam-where-the-islamic-invasion-oriana-fallaci-9-24-83.jpg

He is then seen walking away on his own. He has a distinctive gait which gives him the appearance of walking unevenly and perhaps being slightly bow-legged.

Well that’s a better description than “bearded man”, I guess.

A member of the public then spotted the victim lying on the ground in distress and called 999.

A Metropolitan Police spokesman said such a string of completely random attacks was “incredibly rare” and that detectives investigating the alleged crime had not seen anything like it in careers spanning more than 20 years.

Oh get used to it detectives. You’ll be seeing a lot more cases just like it in the coming years. I can guarantee it.

Detective Inspector Suzanne Jordan, from the Met’s Child Abuse and Sexual Offences Command, (CAS0) added: “This is a horrific multiple sexual assault on an young female who was simply making her way home after a night out. We would like to thank the members of the public who intervened to help her and possibly prevented her ordeal from continuing even further.

“We believe two of the three were very serious sexual assaults indeed, and are determined to catch the persons responsible for these hideous crimes. I would urge anyone who recognises either male in these images to contact us as a matter of urgency.

“We’d also like to speak to any witnesses who haven’t already come forward, or anyone with any information at all however insignificant they believe it might be – it could prove crucial to progressing our enquiries.”

“But whatever you do, don’t say anything that could be interpreted as ‘hate speech’, or else we’ll have to arrest you too.”

scot1

John Biggs, Mayor of Tower Hamlets, said: “I was shocked and appalled by this terrible attack. My thoughts remain with the victim and her family at this difficult time and the council is supporting the police in their ongoing investigations.”

Yes, it’s very shocking because as we all know, Islamic cultures are renowned for their respect for women’s rights. The only possible explanation is that three white, British men must have traveled into the Muslim majority Tower Hamlets, and attacked that girl, with the hope of framing the Muslim community for it. It’s the only possible explanation that makes sense to me.

The council announced that it was ploughing in funds from its reserves to bolster its police force by 19, taking the total number of council-funded officers in the borough to 39.

Mr Biggs said: “The Government might think cutting police budgets is acceptable but we do not. Tower Hamlets is committed to working with and investing in the police to protect residents.”

A better way to protect the residents would be to stop importing incompatible people from completely alien and hostile cultural backgrounds, who have no business being in the country, and having them live among them. I’m still waiting for an explanation as to how mass Islamic immigration has been a net positive to European countries.

Tower Hamlets, which has the highest volume of anti-social behaviour calls to the police in London, has lost 23 per cent of its force in seven years.

The additional officers the council has pledged to fund over the next three years will be tasked with tackling crime and anti-social behaviour as well as acid attacks, drug dealing and violent crime.

A spokeswoman said she believed more and more councils would be forced to fund their own officers in order to future-proof themselves against government cuts to the police budget.

At the rate things are going, law and order will eventually collapse, and we’ll be seeing a “Lord of the Flies” type scenario occur. I’m not optimistic about the future at all.

ook3ZOQ

Bread and circuses… and politics.

Juvenal.jpg

We live in a decaying society. All over the Western world, economic prospects are bleak. Good jobs, which pay a decent wage, and which are fulfilling to do, are few and far between, with rapidly increasing automation only going to make this even worse as time goes by. Affordable housing is an unobtainable fantasy for most young people these days. In Europe, the Barbarians are at our gates, and are actually being welcomed in with open arms, predictable consequences for doing so be damned. In America, racial tensions are the worst they’ve been in almost half a century. Terrorist attacks are happening so regularly, that they barely get any attention anymore, unless they have an exceptionally high body count. Gender relations are completely out of whack, with divorces on the rise, an inability for people to make relationships work at all, and with many men just giving up on them entirely, turning to pornography, masturbation, and soon, sex robots, as an alternative. We live in an absolute nightmare.

On some level, most people know that things aren’t right, and look for distractions from it all. This is nothing unusual, and has been a pretty common occurrence in societies on the verge of collapse. The Romans had a term for it, “Bread and Circuses”.  Basically, the Romans had figured out that as long as the people weren’t going hungry, and had some form of entertainment to take their minds off of things, that they could be appeased, and the real problems facing the empire would be ignored. Of course ignoring the problems doesn’t make them go away, so Rome eventually collapsed under their weight, circa 476 AD.

83d3aa8fb30a403fae8356bc9687345c
The rise of Christianity certainly didn’t help.

Things really aren’t that much different today. Society is going to hell, but people have plenty of “circuses” to keep them pacified. Movies, TV, professional sports, social media, videogames, etc., etc., all fulfill this role in the modern world. However, I’ve noticed a very interesting phenomenon that has been taking place in recent years. The whole point of the circuses is to distract people from the problems that are all around them, a temporary respite from them, if you will.

In other words, they’re supposed to be a safe haven from, not a reminder of these problems, because if they remind people of the problems, they lose all effectiveness as a distraction from them. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing happening these days. The problems people are trying to distract themselves from, are becoming conflated with the distractions themselves.

Lets take sports as our first example, specifically, the NFL in America. As I already mentioned, professional sports are a perfect example of the modern equivalent to the Roman games, and if anything, are probably the closest thing to them. The NFL was a very popular distraction for many Americans from the everyday problems that they face, or at least they were until…

160916164535-05-nfl-players-protest-super-169.jpg
…this.

So for those who are unaware, the NFL is currently being plagued by massive and very public controversy. Many black players are choosing to kneel, rather than standing in respect when the national anthem is being played. Their reason for doing this is to protest against alleged racial injustices that black people supposedly face in America. This of course serves as a reminder of the problem that is America’s increasingly poor race relations, a problem that people would rather distract themselves from. So can you imagine how this must look to white NFL fans who see this happening? They’re ordinary, working class people, dealing with problems of their own, that they wish to distract themselves from, and they turn on the TV and see a bunch of millionaires, paid to play a sport they probably enjoy playing anyway, whining about how oppressed they are, and how privileged their audience is. How do you suppose that has gone down with the audience?

nfl
Yep

So the NFL has actually gone from being America’s most popular sport, to its least popular, directly as a result of these protests. People didn’t watch the NFL to be lectured to, and to be reminded about the problems in their society. They watched it as a distraction, and now that that distraction is gone, they’re tuning out instead.

But hey, it’s not just the NFL that is failing in its duty as a distraction for the masses. There’s plenty of other forms of entertainment doing the same thing. Look at late night, comedian, talk show hosts like Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, John Oliver, etc. Ever since Trump came along, he has pretty much made up the entirety of their acts. Now I’m not saying that it’s anything unusual for comedians to take shots at political figures, and I certainly don’t think that Trump should be exempt from their ridicule. There’s definitely a lot of material to work with there. The problem is, they aren’t simply mocking Trump himself. They’re mocking his base, his supporters, the people who voted for him. That’s 63 MILLION people that they’re attacking. It’s quite possible that many of these 63 million people were at one point, viewers of one or more of these comedians. Do you think they’re still fans now after having been labeled as “racists”, “misogynists”, “dumb rednecks” etc., simply for voting for what they felt was the better choice for themselves and their families? I would be shocked if they are.

Why would any of these people tune in to distract themselves from the problems in their lives, if they know they’re just going to be mocked and insulted by the hosts? What is the benefit to them? There are two other notable examples of entertainment media that I can think of off the top of my head, which are having similar problems. Video games, and comics.

Long considered refuges for geeks and nerds, in the western world at least, video games and comics have both generally been most popular with males, particularly white ones. Most of the most popular super-heroes have historically been white males and this makes sense when you consider the fact that most of them were created in America, back when America was still somewhere between 85 and 90 percent white. That’s not to say that there hasn’t been female and racial minority super-heroes as as well, but the most popular ones of all, such as Batman, Superman, Spider-man, Iron Man, Captain America, etc., have all been white men. Similarly, popular video-games have usually had white male protagonists, because these are more relatable to the biggest target market, but again, plenty of exceptions exist.

In recent years however, there have been attacks on these two industries from outside. People who aren’t even fans of them have whined about how “noninclusive” “racist” and “sexist” they are, and have demanded changes to better suit their own tastes. One of the two big comic publishers, Marvel, has done exactly that. Rather than do the sensible thing of better promoting their existing female and racial minority characters, or creating brand new heroes altogether, they took the approach of taking their most beloved and popular characters, with decades of history and reader attachment, and either replaced them, or made drastic changes to them. Lets take a look at some of these changes that they’ve made the past few years.

Thor.0.0-970x545.jpg
They’ve replaced Thor with a woman.
150904-chu-asian-hulk-tease_ypc9xv.jpg
They’ve replaced the white man “Bruce Banner” with an Asian man who becomes the Hulk.
rs_1024x759-140717041204-1024-captainamerica-samwilson-jc
They made C or D List black superhero, Falcon into the new Captain America, while turning the original white Captain America into a Nazi, a complete bastardisation of his character.
Invincible-Iron-Man-1-Featured
They’ve replaced Iron Man with a black teenage girl.
all_new_wolverine_1
They killed off Wolverine and replaced him with his daughter, X-23.
o-ICEMAN-GAY-facebook
They revealed that perpetual womaniser, Bobby “Ice-Man” Drake, is  actually gay, in the worst way possible.
milesmorales.0
They created a half black, half Latino, Spider-Man, Miles Morales. This one wasn’t so obnoxious, because it was done years before the others, and they didn’t have him replace the original Spider-Man in the process. It’s just seems weird having more than one of them at the same time.

That’s just off the top of my head. These changes have not been well received by long time Marvel fans, and Marvel is aware of this. They try to frame it as if the fans are just a bunch of bigots who can’t accept diversity, but is this really the case? Nobody had any problems with racial minority characters such as Black Panther or Blade, nor did they have any problems with the many female super-heroes that have appeared on teams like the X-Men or the Avengers over the years. Over at their rivals, DC, nobody ever had a problem with Wonder Woman, the black Green Lantern, John Stewart, or the gay super-hero, Midnighter. Diversity was never the problem, because diversity has always existed to some extent in comics. The problem is that they’re replacing beloved and popular characters that fans are emotionally invested in, and then making derogatory comments about the fans when they speak out against it. And sure enough, their sales have declined, and they’re blaming the fans, rather than themselves for this.

With regards to videogames, there’s too much for me to even cover. I’d just suggest reading up on the “Gamergate Controversy”  to get a superficial idea of what’s been happening there. Of course, there’s a lot more to the story than what is being reported there. There’s always the Encylopedia Dramatica article on the topic, if you want to get the other side of the story.

Seeing this infestation of politics, social conflicts, and other problems into what are supposed to be distractions from these issues could have an interesting effect on how people react. The whole reason for bread and circuses is to pacify the masses so that they don’t pay attention to actual problems, and demand real solutions to them. But if these distractions stop working, and people no longer feel that they have a safe haven from these problems, then what are they supposed to do? How can they be kept pacified? Could we perhaps be on the verge of seeing a big awakening soon? I sure hope so.

My thoughts on the Las Vegas attack.

We’re a few days removed from what was apparently the worst mass shooting in American history, beating out the previous record holder from a little under a year and half ago, when Omar Mateen went on a shooting spree in a gay nightclub. The death toll currently stands at 59, with another 500+ injured. At this moment, there’s still very little information about what exactly has happened. We know that the shooter was a white man in his 60s by the name of Stephen Paddock, but we don’t know yet why he did it.

Of course the usual cohort of drooling retards on the internet are chomping at the bit to label him as a “white supremacist terrorist”, simply because he’s a white man who killed a lot of people, and are outraged that he hasn’t been officially declared one… at least not yet. These idiots think that this is an example of a double standard that favour white people, whereby a brown skinned person of the Muslim faith will instantly be labeled as a terrorist for committing an attack, whereas a white man won’t. Of course anyone who has followed this blog will know this is a blatant lie. When the Charlottesville incident happened for example, the media instantly denounced it as an act of white supremacist terrorism, before any facts were established, and demanded that Trump specifically condemn white supremacism, rather than just hatred and violence in general. Compare this to the aftermath of the average Muslim attack, and the instant go to narrative is usually that the attacker was suffering from a “mental illness” (just read any of my previous posts about Islamic attacks and see this for yourself).

No, anyone who actually pays attention to what is really going on, as opposed to making up narratives in their heads, will realise that the media and political establishment will bend over backwards to avoid using the word “terrorist” when a Muslim attacks, but will look for any excuse possible to apply it to “white supremacy” or “right wing extremism”, no matter how poor the supporting evidence is. Inevitably, these narratives always collapse when the facts start coming out, but it sure doesn’t stop them from trying their best.

huffpost
According to this article from the Huffington Post, almost twice as many attacks in America between 2008 and 2016 were from right wing extremists, than from Muslims. Of course what they also forget to mention is that white people make up about 60% of America’s population, whereas Muslims make up about 1%. That means that on a per capita basis, Muslims commit about 30 times as much terrorism in America than white people do. Plus, there’s also this. Don’t trust the media to interpret things accurately.
vox
Vox are quick enough to condemn white extremists too.
chicago.png
And the Chicago Tribune.
intercept.png
And The Intercept.

So I don’t know where this ridiculous narrative that there is an attempt to avoid labeling white attackers as terrorists, came from. I personally think that it’s just a fantasy that idiotic left wing extremists invented in order to maintain their delusions that white people are privileged oppressors and everyone else is an oppressed victim, in the face of facts that debunk this idiocy.

The thing is, terrorism has a very specific definition and while two attacks can look identical of the surface, one might fit this definition perfectly, whereas the other will not. It has nothing to do with the attack itself, but rather the motivation behind it.

terror
“In the pursuit of political aims”

If a Muslim attacker is yelling “ALLAHU AKBAR” or “DEATH TO THE INFIDELS”, then it’s pretty obvious that his motivation for the attack is political, and therefore fits the definition of terrorism. It isn’t considered an act of terrorism just because a Muslim did it. In a situation like this however, we don’t yet know his motivation, so we cannot say for certain that it does fit the definition of terrorism. Maybe it will come out that he had a political motivation and in that case, he absolutely will fit the definition, but until that information is available, we don’t know yet, and cannot definitively say that this was a terrorist attack.

However, the fact that there hasn’t been much of an attempt at all from the media or the authorities, to label this particular attack an example of white terrorism, is indeed quite suspicious to me. Normally it happens immediately, yet here we are days later and there’s nothing. There’s still no explanation for what has happened. This leads me to believe that they might know a lot more than they’re letting on, and are worried about it getting out. ISIS have made the claim that he was a recent Muslim convert, and carried out the attack for them. I’m skeptical that this is true, because ISIS seems to claim responsibility for every attack that happens, but I’m not going to rule out the possibility of it being true, until we get an explanation.

Another theory I’ve heard doing the rounds is that he was a member of Antifa, and specifically chose his target (a country music concert), because based on demographics of the people who like that kind of music, it was mostly going to be attended by white, Republican, Trump supporters, the kind of people that Antifa believe it is perfectly justified to use violence against. Again, there’s no conclusive evidence yet to support this, but much like with the ISIS theory, I’m not going to rule it out as a possibility. Either one of these narratives would be a major setback to the media and political establishment, hence why it wouldn’t surprise me that they could try to cover them up by not releasing any information about the true motivation for the attack at all. I think if he genuinely was a “white supremacist” or a “right wing extremist” that they would have already said so by now. If he wasn’t, then better for them to say nothing and allow people to think for themselves that he was one, than release the truth and reveal that he wasn’t.

Not missing an opportunity to politicise tragedies, the anti-gun crowd have been coming out and demanding more “gun control” in light of what has happened. I’m always suspicious when I see politicians talking about their concern for human life and the wellbeing of their citizens. At the same time that they’re talking about gun control, they’re waging pointless and destructive wars all over the world, and importing millions of violent and incompatible people to live among their citizens, with no regard for the dangers. Their actions suggests that they don’t give a damn about human life at all, and any talk about gun control is due to an ulterior motive.

Who-Do-You-Trust.png
I don’t like going all conspiracy theorist, but I see no evidence to suggest that politicians actually care about human life, and that this is their real motivation for gun control.

Now just to make things clear, I’m no gun fanatic myself, but I would like to address this situation fairly. The general idea being presented is that America’s high levels of gun proliferation is what is causing its high levels of gun violence, and that restricting gun ownership would reduce this significantly. However, I think this is an oversimplification of what’s going on. Switzerland is a country with very liberal gun laws, and they don’t see much gun crime at all. America itself has always had a high level of gun ownership and in decades past, it was so safe, that even schools were able to have gun clubs.

School_679_Baltimore_PattersonHigh_RifleClub_1967
Could you imagine seeing something like this in an American school now?

It’s really only in recent decades that gun violence has gotten out of control in America. Therefore I believe that when you take that into consideration, as well as the situation in countries like Switzerland, that gun violence is a symptom of a problem that has occurred due to changes that have taken place in America the past few decades, rather than the problem itself. Banning guns might in theory make it more difficult for violent, dangerous people, to have access to a means to commit their violent acts, but it won’t get to the root of the problem, which can only be solved by trying to understand what has changed in America between the time when it was perfectly safe for kids to bring guns to school, and now, were there are countless shootings every day, with major incidents such as this latest one in Las Vegas, happening on an all to regular basis. Why is there so much more violence in America these days? That’s the question that needs to be answered.

This story is definitely one that I’ll be keeping an eye on over the next few days. I have a feeling that there’s a lot more to this than we’re hearing about so far. It will definitely be interesting to see what new information will come out, especially when we finally learn what the motive for the attack was. Something tells me that whatever it is, it won’t sit well with the media and political establishment, and the narratives that they would prefer to propagate.

 

 

Germany: Syrian refugee from Ghana rapes woman.

Nature Reserve Rapist May Have Struck Before
“Who would have ever expected this ‘Syrian Child’ would do something like this.”

Guys, you’re not going to believe this, but apparently a woman was raped in Germany recently. Most shocking of all, rather than a native German man being to blame, the suspected rapist is actually  a “refugee” who entered Europe after desperately fleeing for his life from the brutal Syrian civil war, currently destroying his home country of Ghana. This is so shocking because as we all know, men from the third world have the utmost respect for women, and would normally never dream of raping them. This sort of thing has never happened in Germany before. The only explanation that I can think of is some kind of racist conspiracy, motivated by Nazis who have an irrational hatred towards him for the colour of his skin. It’s the only explanation that makes sense to me.

Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.jpg
Our ancestors must be spinning in their graves seeing how much we’ve done to piss away everything they worked hard to give us.

From Metro UK

A failed asylum seeker has called a woman he is alleged to have raped in front of her boyfriend a ‘prostitute’.

“Failed” yet still in the country, roaming free and able to attack people anyway. Why wasn’t he kept in detention as soon as his asylum application failed, in preparation for his deportation? Simple, because Germany, just like every other country in the Western World, is at war with its own people, and don’t care when they’re attacked by monsters like this.

Eric X, from Ghana, was in court on charges of aggravated rape and predatory blackmail.

If only his asylum application had succeeded. He would probably be working hard right now, curing cancer, building time machines, and paying taxes that would go towards the pensions of elderly German retirees. Instead he was rejected by the country he wanted to contribute to so badly, and he had no other choice, but to rape this woman.

It is alleged that he used a tree saw to slash open a tent where the couple were sleeping in a nature reserve near Stuttgart and demanded money shortly after midnight on April 2.

They handed over €6 and a music box before he saw the 23-year-old woman. He shouted at her ‘Come you bitch. I want to fuck you’.

What a charming man.

He then dragged her out of the tent, threatening her with the saw, preventing the boyfriend from being able to help her.

I bet the boyfriend must feel like the most pathetic wimp imaginable, and so he should as well. I can understand that situations like this can be scary, but the fact that he wasn’t even brave enough to try to protect his girlfriend, when he could have easily at the very least attacked him from behind while he was distracted trying to rape her, is just pathetic. They were camping for fuck sake. He could have easily picked up a rock or branch and cracked him over the back of the head with it, even if he was too frightened to attack him head on.

german-soldiers-wehrmacht-nazi-germany-ww2-second-world-war-rare-amazing-pictures-images-photos-009.jpg
Unfortunately, all the real German men died off during WW2.

It is alleged that he then lay a blanket on the floor before raping the woman with the saw close by.

The saw was just “close by” rather than actually in his hands. And the boyfriend meanwhile was sitting nearby, too scared to do try and do anything to stop the attack.

Eric X’s lawyer Martin Moersdorf ordered him to be silent, but he shouted in court: ‘Why should I remain silent, about a case where I don’t know anything about?’

The court heard that CCTV showed he left an asylum shelter, where he has tried to set fire to his cell and has attacked guards, at 7.58pm and did not return until 3.06am.

It’s absolutely incredible really. Why was such a violent creature allowed to roam the streets freely?

He shouted: ‘This is not the truth. This is a trick of the court. A trick question.’

When DNA evidence found on the victim was presented to the court, again he shouted: ‘If the girl claims she has been raped, she must be a prostitute. All who help her in the lie are filthy people.’

Merkel’s policies are responsible for bringing animals like this into Europe, and yet she won another election anyway. This is why I have lost all faith in the world.

Lawyer Gudrun Roth, who represents the 23-year-old student, said that it is ‘always a slap in the face, if someone who has experienced such a thing is mocked even further.’

Both of the victims are currently receiving psychological care.

Eric X arrived in Europe after crossing the Mediterranean Libya. Before he arrived in Germany, he stayed in the Italian capital of Rome and the city of Salzburg in Austria.

He escaped the brutal civil war in Ghana. Then he escaped the brutal civil war in Libya. Then the brutal civil war in Italy. Then the brutal civil war in Austria. Finally, he arrived in Germany, the first country with adequate welfare safety levels, only to have his asylum request rejected. He’s the real victim here.

A few years before moving to Europe, he claims that he killed his brother-in-law in a dispute about the inheritance of a family member in Ghana.

This, combined with his lack of education and dire future prospects, are the main reasons why he chose to migrate to Europe in 2014, according to the psychiatric report.

So when you you read a story like this, what do you suppose is the lesson we’re supposed to learn from it?

A) That Europe is committing suicide via mass third world migration and needs to start closing its borders, before it’s too late.

B) That we need to accept even more asylum applications, no matter how frivolous, in order to prevent rejected asylum seekers from taking revenge.

C) We need to to make more German women aware of the existence of temporary tattoos of the word “No”.

D) Story? Lesson? What story? What lesson? I have no idea what you’re talking about you terrible racist you. I’m too busy reading up on important issues, such as the latest gossip about the Kardashian/Jenner family, to care about meaningless stuff like that.

If you answered “D”, then good job. You’ve earned a gold star. If you answered “B” or “C” then you’re on the right track. You don’t earn a gold star this time, seeing as you’re still paying too much attention to things, but keep up the good work, and you’ll get there eventually. If you answered “A”, then I’m sorry, that’s incorrect. Please report to the Ministry of Love, Room 101, so that we can help cleanse you of that “wrongthink”.

9d14ca75dbcb04895e63ab44345b7e89