Welcome to Airstrip One (Again).

The country now commonly known as the “United Caliphate”, AKA “Britcuckistan”, AKA “Cuck Island“, and formerly known as the “United Kingdom”, is one of the few countries out there that has shown itself to be a viable contender to Sweden, for the crown of “First Western country to commit national suicide”. It’s stories like today’s that reveal exactly why it’s such a strong contender for the title.

From Times of Israel

A Scottish man who taught his girlfriend’s dog to do the Nazi salute was found guilty of a hate crime.

Spare a thought for the precious 6 million, gassed to death in a homicidal fake shower room, by a vicious, Nazi Pug.


Mark Meechan, 29, was convicted on Tuesday in Airdrie Sheriff’s Court in Scotland and is out on bail until his sentencing next month, the London-based Jewish Chronicle reported.

It’s quite likely, he’ll actually go to prison for this. Literally just for posting this video.

An obvious joke video. This is a hate crime now apparently.

He taught the pug, named Buddha, to respond with the Nazi salute when prompted by statements such as “Heil Hitler” and “gas the Jews.” Meechan posted videos of the dog performing the trick on YouTube.


How could anyone have a problem with this? It’s hilarious, and absolutely adorable.

The original video, posted in September 2016 on his YouTube channel, Count Dankula, was viewed more than 2.8 million times before it was removed for violating YouTube’s policy on hate speech. Meechan said on the video that he trained the dog to annoy his girlfriend.

“My girlfriend is always ranting and raving about how cute and adorable her wee dog is, so I thought I would turn him into the least cute thing I could think of, which is a Nazi,” he said.

See? He isn’t even endorsing Nazism. He outright says that he wanted to turn the dog into the least cute thing that he could think of, in order to prank his girlfriend. The worst possible thing he could think of was a Nazi. That means that he thinks Nazis are a bad thing, and therefore is not a sign of support for their views.

Although once again, I have to say that I disagree with his idea that this isn’t “cute”.  Look at the little guy trying to do a Roman Salute.

Meechan later posted a video in which he apologized for the original dog clips, saying it was a joke and that he has no such political leanings.

“I am so sorry to the Jewish community for any offense I have caused them. This was never my intention and I apologize,” he said.

Once again proving the old adage true, which is that when you get attacked for “being offensive”, you should never apologise. They never accept the apology. They just see it as a sign of weakness and it causes them to attack even harder. The man apologised for his obvious joke video, and he still got convicted for committing a hate crime. What good did his apology do?

Sheriff Derek O’Carroll said Tuesday that Meechan “knew that the material was offensive and knew why it was offensive. He would have known it was grossly offensive to many Jewish people.”

O’Carroll said he took freedom of expression into consideration, “but the right to freedom of expression also comes with responsibility.”

So what if it is offensive? It’s called “taking offense” for a reason. Because it’s something that you take, rather than something that is given to you. If they find it offensive, that’s their problem. Have we really gotten to the stage were we’re putting people in prison, for offending others? Have we really sunk that low?

Should the person who did this, also be put in prison, seeing as this would be highly offensive to Christians?

This story is bad enough on its own, but it feels even worse, when you put it in a wider context. It wasn’t long ago that yet another massive case of Muslim men torturing and raping little white English girls en masse, came out. Apparently this had been going on in the city of Telford for almost 40 years. For almost 40 years, a hostile alien force has been destroying the lives of innocent native girls, and the authorities were doing nothing to put an end to it. Yet a guy makes an obvious joke video online, gets arrested immediately, and convicted of a hate crime, just because the video is “offensive”.


Isn’t it funny how quick the police can act when a man who is a member of a “privileged” group, offends an “oppressed” group (Jews), but when another “oppressed” group (Muslims) commits the most vicious and brutal crimes against a “privileged” group (white children), the police do nothing about it for about 40 years? Isn’t that something? Does that not prove, just how real “white privilege” really is?

Britain is in an awful state right now, and is very much in the running to beat Sweden in the race to the bottom.


South Africa votes to confiscate land from white farmers.

“But… but… it will be different in South Africa somehow.”

I’ve been paying close attention to the situation unfolding in South Africa, over the past few years, because I believe that South Africa is a preview of the future facing all white majority countries, if we keep going down the current trajectory that we’re on. South Africa is just a few decades ahead of the rest of us.

From RT

The South African parliament voted on Tuesday in favor of a motion seeking to change the constitution to allow white-owned land expropriation without compensation.
Let this be a warning to any free speech advocating, gun owning, private property owning, white Americans out there. Your constitution is nothing more than a piece of paper. It won’t protect your rights, any more than the South African constitution protects the rights of South Africans, once you lose the demographic majority.

The motion, which was brought by Julius Malema – the leader of the radical Marxist opposition party, the Economic Freedom Fighters – passed by a wide margin of 241 votes to 83 against. 


Every time.

South Africa won’t be any different.

Several parties – the Democratic Alliance, Freedom Front Plus, Cope and the African Christian Democratic Party – did not support the motion. The matter has been referred to the parliament’s Constitutional Review Committee, which must report back by August 30.

“The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice,”Malema told the parliament. “We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.”

They didn’t steal the land from anybody. Most of the land that makes up South Africa was sparsely populated wilderness, with only a small amount of native tribes living there. Those natives currently only make up about one percent of the South African population. In other words, most of the black population, which claim ownership of the “stolen land” settled there AFTER white Europeans had already settled in the country.

Would you look at that? The white population has stayed quite stable, whereas the black population has exploded, thanks to being able to feed off the productivity of the white farmers.

Whites began colonising the sparsely populated land now known as South Africa, in 1652. They created a functioning country out of nothing, and blacks came down from further north to try and share in the prosperity that these white settlers had created. At first there was a symbiotic relationship between the two groups. The blacks got access to higher standards of living than they had ever managed to create themselves, and the whites got access to a source of cheap labour, which they could use to help in their efforts to make something out of the country.

Over the past 150 years, black people have flooded into the country from other parts of Africa, in order to live off the productivity of these white settlers (very similar to what we’re seeing unfold in Europe now with the migrant crisis).  They’ve even been willing to risk getting killed and eaten by lions, just for the opportunity to live in a country that was built by white people. And now, instead of showing their gratitude to these white people, who gave them a better standard of living than they ever managed to create themselves, they want to steal the land from them. The land their white ancestors settled and made something of, and the land that these white farmers have used to feed them. All because they’ve bought into an idiotic notion, that these white people “stole” the land from them.

This is what they actually believe. They also probably don’t understand that Black Panther’s Wakanda, isn’t real.

South Africa has a population of over 50 million people. According to a 2017 government audit, white people own 72 percent of farmland.

Because the white people are the descendants of the ones who settled the land in the first place. The majority of the non-white population, immigrated to the country later, after the land was already settled.

Last week, South Africa’s new president, Cyril Ramaphosa, pledged to return the lands owned by white farmers since the 1600s to the black citizens of the country. He added that food production and security must be preserved.

How can you “return” something to people who never owned it in the first place?

“I want you to return your car to me.”
“I want you to return the money in the cash register to me.”
“I sure hope there’s a big screen TV in here that I can return to me.”

Also, good luck maintaining food production when you take the farms from the people who know how to work them, and “return” them to a bunch of incompetent morons, who don’t know what they’re doing.

The official opposition Democratic Alliance party (DA) has criticized the motion, saying it will undermine property rights and scare off potential investors.

Yep. Why would you invest in a country which has proven that it has no respect for property rights? Why start a business there, when it could potentially be seized by the government, if it ends up being successful?

The DA’s Thandeka Mbabama told the parliament that expropriation without compensation was a way to divert attention from the failure by successive ANC-led (African National Congress) governments.

Yep. Failures such as:

And these are just a few examples of failures, off the top of my head. I’m sure there are plenty of other problems as well, but this is nothing unusual. Every single sub-Saharan African country is an absolute joke, overrun with corruption and complete and utter idiocy. They are completely incapable of running a functioning country. Rather than creating any prosperity themselves, all they can do is steal from the productive elements of their society (the white minority in this case). But once the white minority isn’t around anymore to steal resources from, what will they do then?

It is shocking that at the current rate it will take 35 years to finalize (land) restitution claims lodged before 1998,” said Mbabama, who is deputy shadow minister for rural development and land reform.

It’s been more than two decades since the end of apartheid in the 1990s, and the ruling ANC party is still trying to tackle racial disparities in land ownership in South Africa.

If you have any sense, you would hope that it will take even longer than that. The sooner you do “tackle those racial disparities”, the sooner your country will end up like every other failed sub-Saharan African country. It’s not in your best interests longterm, to tackle them at all.

The president of farmers’ group the Transvaal Agricultural Union, Louis Meintjes, warned the country risks going down the same route as Zimbabwe, which plunged into famine after a government-sanctioned purge of white farmers in the 2000s.

“Where in the world has expropriation without compensation coupled to the waste of agricultural land, resulted in foreign confidence, economic growth and increased food production?” Meintjes said, as cited by Australia’s news.com.au.

“If Mr Ramaphosa is set on creating an untenable situation, he should actively create circumstances which will promote famine. His promise to expropriate land without compensation sows the seed for revolution. Expropriation without compensation is theft.”

The most sensible thing said yet. Shame that nobody is going to listen to him of course.

Pay close attention to what is going on in South Africa. I can guarantee that once things do go to hell, when civil unrest kicks off, when massacres start happening, when people start starving, etc., that the media narrative is going to place the blame solely on the white people. But we know this isn’t the case. We need to be aware of what has actually happened. Because don’t think that something similar won’t happen in Europe, North America, Australia, etc., someday. The whole “we’re taking back our stolen land” narrative, is just an excuse to justify what is happening, to the international community. It’s not about justice. It’s about stealing resources from a group they despise and envy. But once the demographics shift in all other countries, there won’t be any international community to justify their actions to. They’ll be free to the same to us, without having to hide behind any excuses.

An “ethically dubious deal”.

The following piece of text is an extract from George Lincoln Rockwell’s (leader and founder of the American Nazi party) 1967 book “White Power”. I would suggest that you set aside any emotional preconceptions that you might have in regards to the terms “Nazi” and “White Power”, and just judge what is said on its own merits, rather than on its source.

Off the New England and Gulf Coasts of America, a century or so ago, there
were murderous gangs called “ship wreckers”. The gangs would set up false
lights near real lighthouses, cunningly placed so that suspecting ships
approaching the coast in the dark and in storms would be guided onto deadly

As soon as the ship was smashed, while the captain and crew were trying to
survive the storm, these vultures would pounce on the helpless ship and rob it.

To protect themselves from exposure, the gang murdered every human being

There was nothing complicated in shipwrecking. It was the oldest crime in the
world – murder for what the other man had. The only difference was in the
method of using false lighthouses.

Today, there is abroad in the world an enormous gang operating in almost
every nation doing EXACTLY the same thing as the early ship-wreckers,
except that the modem “ship- wreckers” have added a fremendous complexity
of refinements, and instead of wrecking ships, they wreck whole nations.

They are called “Communists”, or “Marxists”. But basically, the leaders are out
to ROB and murder productive people for loot, just as the ship-wreckers robbed
those who had worked for the ship’s cargo, and then killed them.

Their basic technique, in the end, just as with the ship wreckers, is always
naked violence and murder.

But also, just as with the ship-wreckers, they cannot beat the honest productive
people of the world by sheer force. They also need surprise and guile. That’s
where the chart forgery and the fake lighthouses come in.

The Red gang of ship-wreckers lure decent, honest and sincere people onto the
deadly reefs of Marxist insanity with their fake lighthouses of “brotherhood”,
“peace”, “love”, “democracy”, “equality”. And then they rig all the charts
available to show these fake lighthouses as the ONLY safe guides. Meanwhile,
these robbers and forgers rig all our charts (the press) to show the real, safe channels, in which America sailed to greatness, as the most deadly and
dangerous of all reefs.

Once our civilization has been wrecked, the Red gang plans to loot it, as they
have looted every nation they seize.

In the next chapter, I shall present the fingerprints, footprints, witnesses and
handwriting experts to prove before a jury of my fellow Americans just ‘WHO
these Red ship wreckers, robbers and killers are.

But first, I want to prove THAT THE CAPTAINS OF OUR SHIP OF STATE,

Returning to the coast gangs, a hundred years ago, you can imagine the
additional effectiveness of the crime, if the gangs could install some of their
own criminal members as the captains of the ships approaching the phony

With a fake captain, the unsuspecting ship and crew would have NO chance –
even if some of the navigators began to “smell a rat”.

Any navigator who began to protest too vigorously that dirty work was afoot
could be clapped into irons by the captain, with the full agreement of the other
officers, who could be shown the phony charts. The evidence of dirty work
would be too complex for most other officers and crewmen to see, and they
would be led to believe the captain’s lies, because the captain always has the
phony charts to prove he is right.

That’s precisely what has happened to America’s ship of state.

Men like the great Joe McCarthy were “navigators” who tried to warn the other
officers and crew that the captain and the gang were wrecking the ship.

But the fake captains of our nation have been backed up 1000% by the fake
chart-makers – the press, TV, etc. -and have managed to keep the innocent
victims (the crew and ship) convinced that it was McCarthy who was trying to
wreck America on the rocks, while the crooked captains have been presented as the greatest navigators in the history of the world.

Meanwhile, the same “wonderful” captains have been smashing our ship of
state into one rock after the other, always with brilliant explanations by the
captains, and adoring acceptance of the explanations as the ultimate in
statesmanship, by our crooked chart-makers the press. The American crew
never really has a chance.

Rockwell was describing the situation unfolding in his own country, America, as he saw it, but despite having been written half a century ago, and in relation to a different country, I can’t help but find it strangely prophetic in regards to what is taking place in Ireland right now.

“But…but… I thought the media was fair and impartial, and was supposed to keep government in line. They’ve always told us that themselves.”

From The Times

Concerns have been raised about an “ethically dubious deal” between the government and national newspapers that involves journalists writing positive pieces about the Ireland 2040 plan.

The government’s strategic communications unit arranged for sponsored content to appear in local, regional and national newspapers including the Irish Independent and The Irish Times.

Last week, the cabinet travelled to Sligo to unveil the €116 billion national development plan to prepare for an estimated population growth of one million people over the next two decades. It set out spending plans for infrastructure, transport and housing.

It is understood that a number of journalists at Independent News and Media were asked to write positive news pieces, which could not include negative or critical content.

The rest of the article is behind a paywall, but I think the small extract that is available, makes its point clear. The Irish government has recently unveiled plans, for what it calls “Project Ireland 2040”, which details their goals for the country’s development by the year 2040. On the surface, a lot of the goals seem commendable. Improved services. Improved infrastructure. Development of rural areas. Moving to cleaner and more efficient energy sources, etc. However, there is one part that is cause for alarm.

“In 20 years time, there’ll be an extra million people living in Ireland”.

According to the most recent census, Ireland currently has a population just shy of 4.8 million. A population of that size, cannot produce an additional one million people in just twenty years, just from new births alone. Even when combined with reasonable immigration levels, it can’t possibly produce that many. The only possible way that an increase of that level could occur, is through mass immigration, similar to the rates that are currently being experienced in countries like Sweden and Germany.

And we know how well that has turned out for those countries.

Precedent in other countries has already shown that increased mass migration has resulted in an increase in terrorist attacks, riots, rapes against native women and children, and other forms of violence, which is primarily migrants on natives. There’s no argument against this. It’s just observable reality. Why should Ireland be any different in this regard? How can we expect that somehow it will all work out just fine here, when it hasn’t worked out fine anywhere else? I can say with complete confidence, that if Ireland does go down the same path as other countries in regards to mass immigration, then the same problems will happen here as well. I would bet my own life on that.

And this isn’t even taking into account that Ireland is already experiencing a severe housing crisis as it is. How exactly is Ireland supposed to find housing for an additional one million people, when it can’t even provide enough housing for the population that we already have? It simply can’t be done. All this is going to do is push up the already obscenely high cost of housing even further, because the law of supply and demand dictates that when demand is higher than supply, then the prices will increase.

We have a situation that is going to result in very severe problems for the Irish people in the future. And instead of pointing this reality out, the media is colluding with the government, to keep the truth hidden from us. People are being deceived into going against their own demographic interests, in the name of “tolerance” and “diversity”, and other meaningless buzzwords. It’s all a con. Our so called “leaders” and our “free press” are actively involved in this con, and are working against us.

Exactly as the “Nazi”, George Lincoln Rockwell, pointed out half a century ago.

South Africa rapidly heading the direction of Zimbabwe.


There’s not a single successful black run nation on the planet. Don’t take my word for it. Take it from the good people over at foreignpolicy.com.

Their words, not mine… though I do agree.

All kinds of excuses are made for this fact. There’s the lingering impact of colonialism for example. However, if that was the case, then why is it that Ireland, which was colonised for far longer than any black run nation, is far more successful than Ethiopia and Liberia, two black run nations which were never colonised?

There’s the excuse that their natural resources were stolen from them. But if that was the case, then why is it that Japan, a country with virtually no natural resources, is so successful?

There’s geographic location and the associated environmental factors. But if that was the case, why is the Dominican Republic doing so much better than Haiti, when they share the same island? And why was Rhodesia under white rule so successful, but Zimbabwe under black rule so unsuccessful, when it’s the same country in the same location?

Haiti, left. Dominican Republic, right. Notice the difference?

Then of course there’s the good old fashioned “racism” excuse, were some kind of invisible, unquantifiable force, is somehow preventing them from succeeding, even in countries were they make up the demographic majority.

Racism hurt their feelings so much, that it caused them to turn their country into a dump. This is the fault of white people who live in different countries.

All these excuses are complete and utter crap. While no single factor can be given sole credit for a country’s success, or lack thereof, there is one factor above all others, which the evidence suggests has the biggest impact of all. That factor, is the racial demographic of the people who inhabit, and are responsible for running that country, and the evidence also suggests that not all demographics are equal. When looking at historical precedent and every example of when it has been tried so far, one thing is abundantly clear. As a whole, black people are seemingly incapable of creating (or even maintaining one that is already created) a functioning, first world society.

I’ve discussed the South African topic on a couple of occasions already. Check out here, here, and here, to read some of my previous posts. However, I had to go back to the topic again, after watching the latest “Black Pigeon Speaks” video on what is going on there.

If I wasn’t already so experienced with dealing with topics like this, I think I would actually be dumbfounded by what is going on. But I’m not inexperienced at all, so none of this surprises me. I’m not surprised that after handing over control of the country to the black majority, that South Africa is rapidly heading in the same direction that Rhodesia did when the same happened there. I’m not surprised that the black majority are persecuting the white minority, without having the longterm foresight to realise that they depend on this white minority to create any prosperity in the country at all . I’m not surprised that there is so much corruption. I’m not surprised that there is so many murders and rapes. I’m not surprised that there is such huge increase in HIV/AIDS. I’m not surprised that pretty soon, the once first world city of Cape Town, won’t even be able to keep the water running. And most importantly of all, I’m not surprised that the virtue signalling governments of the Western world and the tightly controlled mainstream media, aren’t lifting a finger to help the persecuted whites, all while they bend over backwards to advocate for the millions of Arabs and Blacks who are illegally flooding into Europe.

None of this, none of this at all surprises me. And do you know why it doesn’t surprise me? Because this is exactly what was supposed to happen by design. Ending apartheid was never about empowering the black South African majority, in the same way that mass immigration from the third world to Europe, was never about helping people from the third world, or how affirmative action and diversity quotas was never about helping minorities ( in South Africa they give affirmative action to blacks despite blacks being the majority btw). These policies have always had one primary goal in mind. Causing harm to white people.

The situation in South Africa is a warning to us all (a warning that we should have already taken on board from the situation in Zimbabwe). This is the inevitable future in all white majority countries, if we ever become powerless minorities. Don’t think for a second that the laws and values that we create, will protect us in the future. We will be at their mercy.

And I get the distinct impression, that they don’t know the meaning of the word.

The worst form of inequality…

“What do you mean when you say that the work of a cashier and a warehouse worker aren’t equal? They both do the same amount of hours, damn it.”

Guys, you’re not going to believe this. Apparently Tesco think that it’s OK to pay women less than men for doing the same work. I just can’t get over this. I am feeling seriously triggered right now that such blatant sexism has been going on for so long. Thankfully, some brave, heroic women, have taken a stand for their rights and are taking legal action against this sexist behemoth. Lets read on to learn more about what these women have had to deal with.

From RTE

Tesco is facing Britain’s largest ever equal pay claim and a possible compensation bill of up to £4 billion, according to a law firm which has begun legal proceedings. 

Tesco is Britain’s biggest retailer and its largest private sector employer with a staff of over 310,000. 

Wow I can’t believe this. Didn’t Tesco get the memo? It’s illegal to pay women less than men for doing the same work. How is it that they think they can get away with paying women less than men for doing the same work, in *current year*. It’s just disgraceful really that a company as large as Tesco, could possibly think it’s acceptable to pay women less than men, for doing the same work.

Your typical Tesco executive.

Law firm Leigh Day said that thousands of Tesco employees working in its predominantly male-dominated distribution centres are paid considerably more than the largely female-staffed Tesco stores. 




“Distribution centers.

Tesco DC






In distribution centers, workers have to lift very heavy boxes and operate potentially dangerous machinery such as forklift trucks. In stores, people have to put stuff on shelves, and sit at a till scanning stuff. Call me sexist or whatever, but that doesn’t sound like doing the same work, to me.

It said distribution centre staff may earn in excess of £11 an hour whilst the most common grade for store staff sees them receive around £8 an hour. 

Maybe because the work in the distribution centers is more physically demanding and also potentially more dangerous. As a result, distribution center staff are in a position to demand better remuneration than store staff. Also, the store staff does include men, and I’m sure the distribution centers do include women (albeit a much smaller amount), so wouldn’t those men in stores also receive £8 an hour, and the women in distribution centers, also receive £11 an hour? In other words, it has nothing to do with their gender. Rather, it’s purely down to the role which they perform. If the women who work in the stores are so unhappy with the “sexism” of getting paid less than the men who work in the distribution centers, then the solution is obvious. They should apply for jobs in the distribution centers and take part in the heavy lifting and use of dangerous equipment, alongside those privileged men.

Follow this lady’s example.

This disparity could see a full time distribution worker on the same hours earning over £100 a week, or £5,000 a year, more than female based store staff

Oh but the male store staff aren’t also earning £100 less a week than the distribution staff. No, this only effects the female staff apparently.

Leigh Day said it has already started submitting claims on behalf of its clients. 

It said the underpayment could apply to in excess of 200,000 Tesco employees and with estimated pay shortfalls that could reach £20,000 the final bill for Tesco could be as high as £4 billion.

I don’t even like Tesco, but in this case, I sincerely hope they win this one. This is such a stupid claim that I really think its stupidity is completely self evident. These stupid bitches don’t seem to understand that working an equal number of hours, is not the same thing as providing “equal value” in terms of the work that they do. It would be one thing if male cashiers were getting paid more than female cashiers. If that was the case, I could completely understand their argument, because that would be a clear cut case of one group getting paid less for doing the same work. But these are two entirely different jobs, so there’s no justification for demanding the same amount of money. If something like this is actually allowed to go forward, where will it end?

“I should be getting paid the same amount of money as the doctors. We all work in the hospital so it’s not fair that janitors are paid less than them.”

Child rapist is “trans-aged” apparently.

Look at this poor child. would you believe, that they’re actually trying this 9 year old boy as an adult, just because he engaged in sexual activities with his fellow children? What is the world coming to?

We live in rapidly dying societies. We’ve lost all reason and all sense of reality. We care more about not offending vocal minorities, than we do about protecting the needs of the majority. We give an inch, and a mile… no, not a mile, but rather a light-year is taken in return. When we show ourselves to be willing to compromise on something as basic as objective reality, it stands to reason that there will always be unscrupulous people out there who will be there to prey upon our moral cowardice, if it’s advantageous for them to do so.


A child rapist on trial for sexually assaulting three little girls is now claiming he’s a “trans-aged” little boy trapped in a man’s body. 

Remember though. The slippery slope is just a fallacy invented by bigots to justify their bigotry.

This is what they actually think we believe when we talk about slippery slopes.

According to the Chicago Tribune, 38-year-old Joseph Roman has been accused of violating three girls between the ages of 6 and 8. Now, Roman’s defending himself by claiming he’s a 9-year-old stuck in a grown man’s body.

“A Chicago man accused of sexually assaulting three young girls told prosecutors he considered himself a boy in a man’s body, according to Cook County court documents.

Joseph Roman, 38, is charged with predatory criminal sexual assault stemming from repeated attacks on three girls who were 6 to 8 years old at the time, according to prosecutors. Roman was a friend of the girls’ families at the time of the attacks between 2015 and January of this year.” 

He needs to be fucking executed. Nothing less will suffice for a piece of shit like this.

I think this method will suffice nicely.

Roman’s victims included a 6-year-old girl whose family stayed briefly in his home, and an 8-year-old girl who sometimes stayed with him while her mother worked a late-night shift at her job.  

But this innocent 9 year old boy who is too young to have possibly gone through adolescence, was somehow driven to sexually violate them. It’s not his fault though, as he is clearly too young to comprehend the gravity of his actions. Plus, he’s below the age of consent himself as well, so technically speaking, those three girls are just as guilty of raping him, as he is of raping them. I guess we just gotta let them all go free, or punish them all equally. It’s the only fair solution.

Of course, those of us with more than four brain cells between our ears knew it was only a matter of time before someone offered up the “trans-age” excuse in defense of assaulting children.


In fact, most of us knew the day was coming back when this 52-year-old guy first started claiming he was a 6-year-old girl stuck in an adult male’s body.

Yes, I remember that case well.

If you don’t think that THIS is a 6 year old girl, you’re an evil monster.

Then again, we also knew the left’s whole “open-minds, open-bathrooms” policy would likely lead to women being creeped on and attacked by men in public restrooms and changing spaces – which it didhere and here and also here. 

Yeah, but that’s a small price to pay for not potentially hurting the feeling of a demographics that makes up around 0.3% of the population.

But if men who think they’re women deserve to be treated as such simply because they say so, then whose to say this fully grown guy in Chicago shouldn’t be treated as a little boy stuck in a grown man’s body?

And that’s exactly the point I bring up with regards to the slippery slope, because it is a valid comparison. If we’re going to force people to throw out everything they know and understand about objective reality in one scenario, then what’s to say that we won’t force them to do the exact same thing in other scenarios as well? Why is it OK to demand that people refer to other people with all the physical and genetic characteristics of males, as females, if that is their preference, but we don’t expect similar things to happen in regards to race, species, and in this case, age?

“She’s clearly a cat, you hate filled bigot. How is that in *current year*, there are still uneducated fools like you who don’t understand this?”

One need look no further to see why the left’s “trans” logic is a house of cards that has no hope of standing.

When I look at a case like this, I can’t help but wonder. Is this the sort of thing that people will soon be defending in just a few short years? I know that might sound completely paranoid, but just look at how much things have “progressed” already in the past few years. Is it really hard to believe that something like this might be promoted as normal very soon?

“Shithole countries”

“Wow, lets totally recruit for potential immigrants from this place.”

We just can’t go a single day without some kind of Trump scandal causing massive levels of outrage in both the mainstream media and Social media. The latest thing to come out is that he apparently, in reference to countries such as Haiti, El Salvador, and various African countries, asked “Why are we (America) having all these people from shithole countries come here?” Needless to say, the media is absolutely appalled by this question. How dare he make such racist comments about these countries?


No, instead they tend to have corrupt dictators who impoverish them, while enriching themselves. But yeah, Trump is worse apparently according to the late night talk show dickheads, because he says mean words.


My response is fair play to him for stating the obvious.
Hillary is largely responsible for Haiti being the shithole that it is, so she has no leg to stand on here.

But here’s the thing though.

Where exactly is the lie?

How dare you refer to this as a shithole?

To me, it seems as if all he did was make a simple statement of fact. These countries are shitholes. That’s why their populations are so desperate to flee from them in favour of coming to the United States. But they’re also shitholes for a very specific reason. They’re shitholes because of their demographics.

I’ve said it numerous times, and I’ll say it again. A country is a reflection of its people, not the other way around. The reason why America is such a prosperous country, is the same reason why Canada, New Zealand, and Australia are. It’s because it was founded by Europeans, who created a society based on European values. If it was simply down to geographical location, then why didn’t the Native Americans have the same success with building a great nation, as their European colonisers did?

Haiti and the Dominican Republic. They share the same Island, so geographical location does not account for their differences in success. The real reason is the different demographics.

Haiti on the other hand is primarily populated by people of Sub-Saharan African descent, and just like your average Sub-Saharan African country, is a corrupt, poverty stricken shithole, with pathetic living standards. Haiti has actually been occupied by America on three occasions in the 20th century. Between 1915 and 1934, between 1959 and 1963, and between 1994 and 1995. On all three occasions, America imposed order and stability on the country, even building much needed infrastructure such as roads, schools, hospitals, bridges, etc, during the first of these occupations. Yet as soon as they handed back control to the Haitians and departed, the country would soon after fall apart again every single time. It’s one thing to not be able to build a functioning country, but the fact that they’ve been handed a pre-built country on multiple occasions, and have failed to even maintain it, really says it all. This is much the same as what we saw happen when Rhodesia became Zimbabwe, or what we’re seeing happening in real time to South Africa post-Apartheid. Functioning civilisations are seeing a power transfer from one demographic to another, and that new demographic repeatedly fails to maintain what was handed to them.

This happened to Haiti multiple times. It happened to Zimbabwe. It’s happening to South Africa. And it’s happening to multiple big cities in America, such as Detroit, Baltimore, east St Louis, etc. Can anyone really deny this?

So when you take all this into consideration, then is it not a fair question to ask? Why is America taking in people from these shithole countries? How exactly does America benefit from their presence? What do they contribute? What skills or abilities do they have that can’t either be found within America itself, or from non-Shithole countries (Trump cited Norway specifically as a country he would like to see immigration from instead)?

A country is a reflection of its people, not the other way around. And after seeing what the Haitians have done to Haiti on more than one occasion, then does it not stand to reason, that they’d only end up doing the same thing to America as well?


Peter Sutherland finally passes into Hell, aged 71.

You won’t be missed, you evil piece of shit.

There’s some glorious news today, which coming this early in the year, I hope is a good omen for the rest of 2018. Peter Sutherland, one of the most vile and despicable human beings, that Ireland has ever produced, has finally taken the last breath of his worthless life. I personally have been looking forward to this day for quite some time, but I figured it wouldn’t happen for at least another decade, so this is definitely a pleasant surprise.

That cat is me right now.

I know there’s this whole concept of “do not speak ill of the dead”, but I’ve never understood that. By that logic, we can never speak negatively about Ted Bundy, or Joseph Stalin for example. Just becomes someone dies, doesn’t excuse the type of person they were in life, and Sutherland was not in my opinion, someone that I would call a “good person”.

Peter Sutherland was a leading member of Goldman Sachs, arguably the most greedy and ruthless financial organisation on the planet.  An organisation that makes profit off of the misery of ordinary people. He was a leading voice in promoting the narrative that Ireland had to pay the Anglo Bondholders, one of which was in fact “Goldman Sachs asset Management International”, his own organisation. He didn’t seem to have any problem asking ordinary Irish people to tighten their belts, while our money was stolen from us, in order to reimburse organisations like his for their bad investments.

According to Sutherland, it would be wrong to make Goldman Sachs take the financial hit for making a poor investment, but it was perfectly fine to make his fellow Irish people take the hit, for something they had nothing to do with.

But most importantly of all, Sutherland was a massive shill for globalisation, undermining the national homogeneity of nation states, and importing millions of incompatible savages to the EU, without regard for the consequences for doing so, or for the will of the majority already living here. We’ve seen how that has turned out. Like all the big players behind this goal, he hid behind the guise of “humanitarianism” when promoting it. That it was our obligation to help the poor unfortunate “refugees” desperately fleeing for their lives from their own countries. The fact that he did this while having a leading position in Goldman Sachs, an organisation that profits off of war and asset stripping the third world, is neither here nor there. Apparently, you can still play the part of humanitarian while involved in that sort of thing, and anybody who is suspicious of your true motives, is just a “racist”.

But yeah, I never bought into the narrative that he was just a concerned humanitarian, trying to help the same people that his organisation was making profits off of harming. What I saw was nothing more, than a cold-hearted psychopath, who was cynically preying on the altruism of ordinary people, in order to push a globalist agenda which was beneficial to him and his kind, but not in the interests of the ordinary people that he was pushing it on. As far as I’m concerned, every Irish person who committed suicide due to financial despair in the years since the bailout. Every woman and child who was raped by a Muslim migrant that entered Europe illegally. Every victim of a terrorist attack in Europe that occurred as a direct result of the open borders policies that Peter Sutherland championed. Their blood is at least partially on his hands, and he never showed any sign that he was even slightly remorseful in light of the damage that was done.

And this is why I’m glad this piece of shit is finally dead.

An artist’s rendition of what Sutherland is likely experiencing right now.

The question is, who’ll be next?

*fingers crossed*

Dundalk rampage killer was an asylum seeker.


It’s hard not to feel like Cassandra sometimes, cursed as I am with the ability to see horrifying (but accurate) prophecies of things to come, or in my case, the ability to use pattern recognition, as a predictor of future events, and to understand the relationship between “cause” and “effect”. In fairness, in a world where the majority of people deny basic reality, in favour of believing in their feelings instead, they may as well be the same damn thing.


Almost a year to the day ago, I wrote a post about how Ireland was finally following in the footsteps of other European countries and would begin taking in migrants as well. I didn’t think this would turn out well and I criticised the decision. In fact, my closing statement in that post was this.

I’m just going to call it right now. We’ve seen countless problems occurring all over Europe as a result of this migrant crisis. Terrorism, rapes, all kinds of random violence. Why should we expect that Ireland will be any different? No, we’re going to eventually see similar problems here if they keep this up. The numbers are insignificant right now, but eventually, there will be enough of them for there to be an impact. I really hope that I end up being wrong on this one, but we’ll just have to wait and see.

And sure enough here we are a year later, and this happens.


An 18 year old “Asylum Seeker” from Egypt, by the name of “Mohammad” arrives in the country and just a few days later goes on a rampage of seemingly random violence, killing one, and injuring two others. It’s the same story we’ve seen play out numerous times in France, Britain, Germany, Sweden, and many other European countries, over the last few years and just as myself and many others predicted, we’re now seeing it happen here as well.

Straight away, the mainstream media jumped to dismiss terrorism as a motive.


But this is inaccurate reporting. The Gardaí are still investigating the incident and have simply made a statement that they have founds no links to terrorism, so far in the course of their investigation.


That doesn’t automatically mean that it’s not a terrorist attack, because even if he has no connection to any terrorist organisations, he could just as easily have been a “lone wolf”, radicalised by the internet, in a mosque, or even just from his own reading of the Quran.

Do you really need to have any “links” to terrorism in order to  become one yourself, if this is sort of things you believe in?

I’m not writing this post to gloat about “being right”, because quite frankly, this is not a topic that I wanted to be right about. Like most people of my generation, I grew up believing in the whole “diversity is our strength” narrative, and that multiculturalism would work out perfectly fine. I really wanted it to as well because I never cared about a person’s skin colour, accent, geographical origin, religious beliefs, or anything else along those lines, that made them different. However just because I wanted things to work, doesn’t mean that I was willing to ignore reality and pretend that it was. I couldn’t ignore the increase in acid attacks, rapes, child grooming gangs, terrorism, and other forms of violence that has been occurring in Europe as the demographics change. Pattern recognition is not evil. It’s something we’re biologically hardwired to do because it helps keep us alive.

“Sure every Lion we’ve encountered so far kills and eats us. But it would be wrong to notice a pattern there. That would be Lionphobic.”

I had to accept that the multicultural project was failing miserably and I changed my views accordingly. When I predicted a year ago that Ireland would inevitably start seeing problems with migrant violence, I didn’t do so with the hope that I would be right. I just knew that it was going to happen no matter what.

And unless we learn from what has happened and start taking the right preventative steps, it’s going to keep on happening.

A small sample of what we’re up against: Part 5

Wow, it’s been quite a while since my last time posting anything. As it stands, I’m still feeling a little bit burned out, and with little desire to talk about any topics in particular (though who knows, when the inspiration will hit me again?). However, I still want to get some content out, so I’ll do what I always do, whenever I’m going through one of these phases. I’m going to do another post in my “A small sample of what we’re up against” series, in which I take screenshots of crazy things that have been said, which serve as examples of just how bad things have gotten in the world. To see my most recent post in this series, please click here.

Anyway, enjoy.

A height of 5’0″ and a weight of 250 pounds, works out at a BMI of 48.9. A BMI of 40 or higher is considered “Morbidly obese”. In other words, this person is not just a “little bit chubby”, but because fat acceptance has gone so far, people aren’t allowed to point this out, regardless of how dangerous it is.
I guarantee that this guy is a future recipient of the “Me too” hashtag.
They always redefine words so that they, and their pet projects are never in the wrong in any situation. The sheer idiocy of this statement is so self-evident that it doesn’t even merit a real response.
People who are too lazy/gluttonous to lose weight themselves, don’t want to hear about other people’s success in their efforts, because it serves as a reminder of their own failure.
Yes, because countries like Japan have not been infected with the same brain virus, which causes people to believe the ridiculous idea, that there are more than two genders.
Basically the same kind of idiotic argument as was seen in the other screenshot above about how “trans people don’t have the power to commit rape”. Isn’t it funny, how the dictionary is always wrong when they want to redefine words based on their ideology and no evidence to justify the redefinition, but the dictionary definition of feminism is apparently spot on, even though the observable behaviour of modern feminists is nothing like the dictionary definition?
Repeating something over and over, does not automatically make it true. Also, I’m no expert, but I thought fake tan was generally used on the arms and legs, not the face.
The main argument I would use is that this is not how burden of proof works. As traditionally, the penis has always been considered “male genitals”, the burden of proof is on those who claim otherwise to prove that this is wrong, rather than on us to prove that it’s right.
And yet they still won’t ever explain why people of other races want to live in white countries so badly, if we’re such genocidal, racist, monsters.
Are you going to explain how exactly? No, of course not.
Again, I ask. Why do you want to live in our countries among us, if we’re so terrible? Is it not obvious at this point that they actually want to exterminate us and take our countries from us?
Yes that’s right, because our gender and pronouns are in line with reality, whereas yours are based on your feelings. It’s not that difficult to understand.
Yeah…that sounds plausible. This is an example of a crazy person who confuses things that happen in their head, with things that happen in real life.
“I’m shaking because that white boy said something which is completely true.” Also, isn’t it funny how they have to make everything about race?
The what?
I wish I could see the name to be sure, but I’m guessing that this self-hating white person is actually a Jew.
Actually, being fat is what’s actually deadly. How many people die from obesity related health problems, versus those who die from experiencing “fatphobia”?
Once again, all white people are one homogeneous entity, and the same ones who finance these expeditions, don’t give change to the homeless POC. Btw, the fact that there are homeless white people freezing on the streets too, is neither here nor there.
No, there are only two genders. Even if you believe there are more, there are still only two sexes. If a “bi person” has no interest in either males or females, they aren’t bisexual. They’re either gay or straight depending on their own gender.
Well then you say “our women and men” if you want then. Nobody is stopping you, and nobody sane cares which one you say first.

And that’s it for now. Though of course, there will definitely be more posts in this series in the future. Plenty of more material to come.