The media are scared.

Whoever controls the flow of information, controls the thoughts of the masses. For a very, very, long time, this power was exclusively in the hands of the mainstream media. They had the power to decide the results of elections, decide popular policies, and  decide pretty much everything else of importance. However, they eventually became complacent, self-assured that their power was untouchable. And because they became complacent, things have now changed, and they’re in full on panic mode. They’ve been exposed and lost the trust of the masses, and they can’t handle it. Instead of taking a moment to reflect on everything, they instead have chosen to have a two year long temper tantrum, that currently shows no sign of abating.

From CNN

President Donald Trump met with the publisher of the New York Times A.G. Sulzberger earlier this month. But the two seem to have different recollections of the July 20th meeting at the White House.

Of course they do.

Trump first revealed the meeting took place in a tweet on Sunday morning from his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey.

“Had a very good and interesting meeting at the White House with A.G. Sulzberger, Publisher of the New York Times,” Trump wrote. “Spent much time talking about the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, ‘Enemy of the People.’ Sad!”

Where’s the lie exactly? All they ever do is put out fake news these days. In fact,they put out so much fake news, that Trump was actually able to make a list of the top 10 fake news stories of 2017, just by picking the ten most egregious examples.

But by saying this is fake news, you’re finally telling the truth, which means this isn’t fake news, and calling it fake news, is fake news. My head hurts now.

This is not simple incompetence. This is a deliberate attempt to gaslight,mislead, and control the thoughts of the general population. They want the people to feel frightened, feel angry, and to vote against their own interests. Therefore, it is perfectly fair and accurate to refer to the mainstream media as the enemy of the people.

In a lengthy statement released after Trump’s tweet, the New York Times said that it was the White House who invited the Times, and that it requested the meeting be off-the-record.

This could very well be true, but seeing as they’ve put out so much fake news already, I’m not going to believe them.

But with Trump’s tweet, a Times spokeswoman said the newspaper decided to publicize Sulzberger’s “detailed notes.” Sulzberger attended the meeting along with editorial page editor, James Bennet.

Sulzberger said he accepted the meeting to raise concerns about “the president’s deeply troubling anti-press rhetoric” and that he told Trump his language was divisive and “increasingly dangerous.”

According to the Publisher of the NYT, Trump is the one who is using divisive language.


Is it zero self awareness, or a zero sense of shame with these people?

“I told him that although the phrase ‘fake news’ is untrue and harmful,

He just engaged in fake news with this sentence.

I am far more concerned about his labeling journalists ‘the enemy of the people.’ I warned that this inflammatory language is contributing to a rise in threats against journalists and will lead to violence,” Sulzberger said.

And meanwhile in the United States…


Do you think that maybe there’s a possibility that the hateful rhetoric that media like the NYT put out about white people, could be contributing to the stats above? Do they even care? Of course not. These journalists make me sick to my stomach. They don’t give a damn about the violence that they incite on others, but when they’re called out, suddenly, they’re the victims.

Mr. Sultzberger is proving the old proverb is as relevant as ever.

“I repeatedly stressed that this is particularly true abroad, where the president’s rhetoric is being used by some regimes to justify sweeping crackdowns on journalists.

Citation needed.

I warned that it was putting lives at risk, that it was undermining the democratic ideals of our nation, and that it was eroding one of our country’s greatest exports: a commitment to free speech and a free press.

You shameless, sickening rat. Nobody is stopping you from engaging in free speech. Nobody is stopping the free press from reporting the news. All he’s doing is calling you out on your lies, and holding you to account. Just as you have a right to say something, other people have a right to respond. These journalists are just unbelievable. They actually genuinely believe that they should be free to say whatever untrue things they want about people, and claim that they’re the victims, when these people talk back.

It’s times like this that I actually wish Trump really was as bad as they say he is, and was rounding up journalists and executing them.

“Throughout the conversation I emphasized that if President Trump, like previous presidents, was upset with coverage of his administration he was of course free to tell the world.

Which is exactly what he’s doing.

I made clear repeatedly that I was not asking for him to soften his attacks on The Times if he felt our coverage was unfair.

And so he shouldn’t.

Instead, I implored him to reconsider his broader attacks on journalism, which I believe are dangerous and harmful to our country,” he continued.

And I, and many others believe, that spreading fake news is a much greater danger, than calling out the perpetrators of the fake news. Maybe if you stopped lying, stopped trying to incite violence against white people, and started just reporting a fair and unbiased report of the news, you wouldn’t have to worry about being called out anymore.

“The president regularly meets with members of the media and we can confirm this meeting took place,” said White House spokeswoman Mercedes Schlapp.

A president meeting with the publisher of one of the country’s most prominent newspapers is not unusual. Presidents have often held off-the-record meetings with owners and publishers of major media outlets.

But the Times holds a special place for Trump, a New York native. Despite his frequent criticism of Times’ reporters and their stories, he has still given the paper multiple interviews.

Yeah,and that’s a stupid idea Trump. Don’t give them the time of day. They need you, more than you need them.

Sulzberger is still a new publisher. He took over the family-controlled paper from his father Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. in January and has been overseeing a boom time for the business.

Yes, they’re experiencing such a boom time in fact, that they had to sell several floors of their building.


Despite Trump’s “failing New York Times” nickname, the Times is actually experiencing a surge in subscribers and popularity. Its profits increased by about two-thirds in the first quarter of 2018. Its “The Daily” podcast brings in millions of listeners each month.

Yeah, until actually see the statistics here, I’m going to remain skeptical.

Soon after winning the 2016 election, Trump traveled to meet with editors and reporters at the New York Times’ headquarters, where he lauded the paper as a “great, great American jewel” and that he hoped they could all “get along.”

He knows better now.

“Diversity is good because of the World Cup”

france2016_8fi8nrh-lr_erjlkc1 (1).jpg
Wow, look at how “diverse” the team is. 7 out of 11 are black. Perhaps someday it will be 11 out of 11, and they will then achieve 100% “diversity”.

I’ve often pointed out that the “diversity is our greatest strength” meme, has been heavily pushed, even though not a single shred of evidence has ever been provided to back it up. However, it looks as if they’ve finally found the evidence that they’ve needed at last. Following France’s recent victory in the World Cup, the treacherous career politicians, and the tightly controlled mainstream media are all rallying behind the story as “proof”, that diversity really is a strength. Lets just take a look at a sample of some recent headlines on the topic.


Wow, when you look at that, it seems pretty unanimous. How could anyone possibly doubt it, when all these different media sources, all independently came to the same conclusion? The evidence must be overwhelming. If I didn’t know better, and I was some kind of crazy, tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist, I would almost suspect that the media is basically a monopoly colluding with one another, on the narratives that should be pushed.


No, I would say that THIS, is what is actually extremely dangerous to our democracy.

So yeah, according to the media and the political establishment, diversity is a wonderful thing, because a “diverse” team won a tournament that involves kicking a ball into a net. This is apparently the most important thing ever.

So lets take a look at what has been happening in “diverse” France, in the aftermath of their world cup victory.

Isn’t it funny, how the media is cherry picking which stories to focus their attention on, in regards to the diversity narrative? They play up the benefits of diversity in regards to the World Cup victory, a great honour for any country of course, but not something that is essential to the wellbeing of France or the French people. But in regards to the riots, violence, property damage etc., all of which are largely a consequence of France’s immigration policies, they are completely silent. No sane person thinks that the benefits of winning the World Cup, compensate for the untold damage that the country has undergone in the last few decades. Does the World Cup victory compensate for the multiple terror attacks? Does it compensate for all the burned our cars and smashed windows? Does it compensate for all the black/Arab on white violence that has happened in the country? Does it compensate for the collapsing social cohesion in the country?

“My country is rapidly dying, but at least we won the World Cup.”

Of course it doesn’t, but the media and career politicians are never going to ask any of these questions, because they don’t give a damn about any of this. They have a mission to enforce a multicultural dystopian hellhole on the people of Europe, and they will cynically exploit any piece of propaganda that can help promote it, while downplaying  any information, that might hinder it.

Enjoy your World Cup victory French people. If things keep going the way that they’re going, it could very well be one of the last things that you have any reason to feel proud about.

Israel manages to outrage the entire world.

I’m a few days late discussing this particular topic, but I just had to make sure that I didn’t overlook it. A few days ago, America officially moved its embassy to Jerusalem. This is something that numerous former US presidents have promised to do, but none have ever actually gone through with, until now. This action is considered outrageous to the Palestinians, because Jerusalem is just as important to Muslims, as it is to the Jews. So when the move happened a few days ago, the Palestinians came out en masse to protest. How did Israel respond?



Basically, the Israeli army went completely psycho and started trying to exterminate the protesters with extreme prejudice. It’s not even like they tried using non-lethal methods such as water cannons or rubber bullets first, and were left with no choice but to switch to lethal methods, after the non-lethal methods had proven unsuccessful. They didn’t hesitate at all to start killing people, and seemed to do so with glee.

None of these videos are from the recent massacre, but they do show examples of how sadistic the Israeli soldiers are towards the Palestinians.

So the whole world (except America of course) are absolutely disgusted with what happened. Plenty of people already knew how despicable Israel can be, but never before has it been so clear and in our faces. They made zero attempt to hide their brutality, and now more people than ever, can see them for what they are. However, what people are failing to comprehend about the situation, is this. This isn’t simply a representation of the behaviour of the Israeli state. No, this is in fact, a perfect example of the standard Jewish behaviour.

I’ve often tried discussing the Jewish topic with people, but most people, even many of those who are awake enough to be anti-political correctness, anti-SJW, anti-mass third world immigration, etc., just do not seem to get it. It’s like there’s a mental block in place that triggers once they hear the word “Jew”, in much the same way that most other people lose all rational thought when someone dares to speak out against Muslim immigration. But that’s just the power that these people have. Because these people:

Hollywood Jews


Open in new tab to enlarge.


They have the ability to shape how people think and feel, by tightly controlling the narrative that goes out. Not only that, but thanks to their financial might, due to their control of banking around the world, they also have an unmatched ability to pressure governments to pursue what interests them.

Indeed, look at how the US reacted to the alleged chemical attack by Assad on Syrian citizens. Without even waiting for evidence, or even a plausible explanation for why he would even do it, The UK, France, and The US bombed the country, while the Jewish dominated media egged them on to do even more. Or how about Iran, Israel’s biggest enemy currently. They haven’t even done anything wrong at all, and they’re being sanctioned by Trump, and the media will not defend them. Compare this to the media’s response to what Israel just did to the Palestinians the other day. There are no demands for any kinds of action against Israel, and the American government is defending them, as they always do, every single time Israel commits a human rights violation. Funny isn’t it, how the Jewish controlled media and the American government treats Israel, compared to how it treats Israel’s enemies?

Going back to the point I was originally making. People seem to think that what Israel is doing, is only representative of a small subset of Jews, rather than the Jewish community at large.  This is false. According to an article from just one month ago, Israel is currently home to about 43% of the world’s Jewish population. The country with the next highest Jewish population, is the United States, with roughly 39% of the world’s Jewish population. So these two countries between them, have about 82% of the world’s Jewish population. An estimated 94% of American Jews support Israel, and obviously 100% of Israeli Jews do. Therefore that’s easily about 80% of all Jews in the world, who support Israel straight away. So is it really that hard to consider the possibility that when the rest of the world’s Jewish population is taken into account, that it could easily be higher than 90%?

But it doesn’t stop there. You see, what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians, is exactly what they would love to do to the rest of us, if they had the power to do so. You need only look at the anti-white rhetoric that their media puts out. They have a genocidal hatred towards us. There are many groups that are aligned, due to their shared hatred of us, but it is the Jew who is the leader of the anti-white movement, as I covered in my article last year about the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution.

You want more evidence that they would treat us like they treat the Palestinians? Simply look at this.


The photo above is taken from my own copy of The Gulag Archipelago. The six men pictured, described in the book as “six hired murderers each of whom accounted for thirty thousand lives”: Sergei Zhuk, Naftaly Frenkel, Yakov Rappoport, Matvei Berman, Lazar Kogan, and Genrikh Yagoda, were the ones who ran the brutal Gulag system. With the possible exception of Zhuk (whom I can’t find any information on) every one of these men were Jews. Jews who treated the Russian people with the same inhumanity that the Israeli Jews treat the Palestinians now, all while being fully supported by the American Jews. Whenever they have complete unchallenged power over others, whether it be the Russians in the USSR, or the Palestinians, they commit atrocities. It’s just that most normal people can’t see the connection, because they judge them as individuals, rather than as a collective. But it goes much further than this. Even when they don’t have total power, they are still a massive threat to us all.

They’re massively over-represented as paedophiles. For example:

They’re willing to engage in false flag attacks against their own supposed allies, if it will further their goals. For example.

They dominated the Atlantic Slave trade (which they’ve instead blamed on white people, in order to turn blacks against us, while instilling guilt in us for their crimes.).

They (allegedly) have a history of kidnapping and sacrificing Gentile children for religious rituals. This could just be a conspiracy theory, but it seems to show up quite a bit, and in various different locations and time periods. Examples of such alleged cases include:

They’re vastly over-represented in accusations of sexual misconduct during the recent “metoo” phenomenon.


They claim to be white when they want to trick white people into acting against our own interest, but will claim to be Jewish rather than white, when they want to promote their own Jewish interests.

And as I’ve already made clear, they were vastly over-represented in promoting Communism, an ideology that has resulted in about 100 million deaths in the last century.

But yet they claim that in all the 109 times (or possibly as much as 359 times if other sources are to be believed), that they’ve been chased out of wherever they were residing, that every single time, they were just innocent victims, and everyone else just hated them for no reason.

This is what they actually believe.
This is what actually happens.

Look, I understand this is probably uncomfortable to take in, but just consider the points that I’ve made. Can you honestly say that it doesn’t all make sense when it’s all laid out like this?

Germany getting even more totalitarian.

The Jew is goodness personified. A creature of pure benevolence and generosity. God’s chosen people. An example to us all. However for reasons which remain a mystery, many people (by which I mean, literally every society that has ever dealt with them throughout history), have been infected with the vicious brain disease known as “antisemitism”, which causes them to hate and persecute these pure and innocent victims, for absolutely no reason. Unfortunately in *current year*, this trend hasn’t changed. In the country now commonly known as “Germanistan”, the Nazis are back, but they now go by names such as “Muhammad” rather than the likes of “Adolf”. Maybe the Jewish individuals and organisations pushing so hard for “diversity”, should have considered the longterm consequences of their decisions to flood Europe with these people.

When the Native Germans are gone, and Germany is a Muslim majority country, how do you think that will work out for you and your kind? Not well at all, if present events are a sign of things to come.

Because Germany has a duty to atone for all eternity for certain past events, they need to come up with a solution to the problem of newly arrived Muslim migrants and their (completely irrational and unfounded) hatred of the Jews. Of course, simply closing the borders and sending them back to their own countries (which totally aren’t “shitholes” btw), would be inhumane and evil. So what other solution is there? Well, one bright spark has come up with a unique idea to say the least.

From RT

Authorities should be allowed to take children away from parents who express anti-Semitic views, the head of Germany’s 2nd largest police union has stated, without elaborating on how or when such measures would be enforced.

“We can’t be allowing parents to teach their own values to their own children. The state knows better and should therefore have the right to kidnap these children from their parents and brainwa… er… I mean… ‘educate’ them better on our tolerant German values.”


“Authorities need to act decisively [against anti-Semitism] including when the aggression comes from migrants,” Rainer Wendt, head of the German Police Union (DPoIG) told Augsburger Allgemeine newspaper on Wednesday.

If only the authorities were expected to act as decisively against all the migrant violence against the ordinary German citizens. Isn’t it funny how they can be so tolerant towards that, but spring into action, as soon as the Jews start feeling uncomfortable?

“Sorry, but ‘truck of peace’ attacks are just something you’ll have to get used to. We’re too busy dealing with all the antisemitism instead.”

“If children are raised to become anti-Semites we shouldn’t be afraid to take them away from their families.” He went on to accuse many school administrators of ignoring the problem, saying “they act according to the mantra ‘it doesn’t exist in my school.’”

Will they be taking similar steps in regards to children raised by parents who express racial hatred towards white people? I think we can guess the answer to that.


“There has also been a tendency not to willingly register anti-Semitism by Muslims – but it needs to be recorded without prejudice so that we can develop effective counter-strategies,” Wendt said.

Yep. I can imagine this has been really tough for the German authorities. On the one hand, they’re getting directions to flood their country with Muslims, to the point were they’re guaranteed to be the dominant demographic eventually, unless there are drastic changes made soon, and to punish anyone who speaks out against it. But then on the other hand, these Muslims despise the Jews, and aren’t afraid to be open about that hatred, and with Germany’s history there, it becomes a case of “How are we supposed to solve this problem?” I have no sympathy btw.

Although Wendt did not specify how exactly he expects it to be determined that parents are anti-Semitic, Josef Schuster, the head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, called last week for a better system to be introduced in schools. He said that teachers and students should have a way to report “anti-Semitic or other acts of violence without bureaucratic hurdles, in order to get a clearer picture of what is going on.”


Wendt’s remarks came just days after Wolfgang Schaeuble, speaker of the Bundestag, said that radical Muslim communities and immigrants with extremist views on Israel are contributing to anti-Semitism in Germany. 

Who could have possibly predicted that this would happen? You know, besides anyone who still has a grasp of basic reality, that is?


It also comes after a Jewish girl in a Berlin primary school was reportedly told by a Muslim classmate that she deserved to be beaten and killed because of her religion, in the third report of anti-Semitism in Berlin schools over the past 12 months. Another Jewish student in Berlin was recently forced to change schools as a result of violent bullying by Muslim classmates, who threatened him with a fake gun.

Wow these things are so much worse than what the women of Cologne, or the people at the 2016 Berlin Christmas Market had to deal with. Finally, we’re hearing about the real problems that are actually worth a proper response.

The police union chief’s remarks come after it was reported that lawmakers from Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats (CDU) and sister party CSU were seeking to adopt measures to deport migrants who express anti-Semitic views in Germany.“Complete acceptance of the Jewish life” is a “criterion for successful integration,” a draft of the proposal said, according to Die Welt.

Any chance of deporting migrants who advocate for terrorism, violence against homosexuals, or who rape native German women and children? Any chance at all? Yeah, I won’t be holding my breath here.

Germany saw an influx of around one million mainly Muslim migrants at the height of the refugee crisis in 2015. Merkel’s open-door policy for those fleeing conflicts and persecution sparked outrage among her critics, who complained about a rise in migrant-related crimes and a strain on the social welfare system.

Yep, and then many of these “critics” ended up getting arrested, simply for expressing their dissatisfaction, with her insane and idiotic decision. You see Germany is not a free country at all. It’s a totalitarian nightmare, not unlike the USSR or North Korea, were a tyrannical state makes decisions that are at odds with the wellbeing of the citizens they supposedly represent. When these citizens speak out against these decisions, something which is generally considered an inalienable right in democratic societies, the state punishes them, ostensibly for engaging in “hate speech”, but really, just for pointing out the truth. It’s an absolute disgrace really.

I think this proposal to take children away from migrant parents who express “anti-Semitic” views, has the potential for abuse. I could easily see it setting a precedent, which could later be used as justification for doing the same thing to native German parents, even the ones who speak out against the migrant invasion. I really don’t see why it couldn’t happen. The German government is desperate to conceal the reality of what is going on, and is willing to do whatever it takes to silence dissenters. Some people may be willing to risk going to prison for speaking truth to authority, but how many would be willing to risk losing their children for it?


Paedophile has sentencing delayed so he can go on holiday.

Normally I come up with my own headlines, but in this case, I think the one from the original article cannot be bettered. This is the world we live in now.

I said it a few days ago, and I’m going to say it again. If there’s any country right now, that stands a legitimate chance of surpassing Sweden in the race to national suicide, it would have to be the United Kingdom. Every time I think they’ve already sank so low, that there’s nothing more that they could possibly do to surprise me anymore, they somehow manage to find a way to do so anyway. Just look at that headline. What more needs to be said?

From Metro UK

A paedophile has had his sentencing postponed so he can go on holiday in the Lake District.

And imagine if he just happens to do something to a child when he’s there because he knows he’s going away for a long time anyway, and won’t get another chance in the near future?

But sure who cares about that? It would be mean to not let him go on holiday and as we all know, being mean is a much greater evil, than sexually abusing children.

Last week, Kristopher Cook was scheduled to be sentenced for attempting ‘penetrative sexual activity’ with a child.

However instead, he has been told he is free to go away with his family. Cook will now be sentenced a week later in a move dubbed a ‘joke’ by paedophile hunter group Dark Justice. A spokesperson said: ‘What sort of message does that send out to victims?

It sends the message that their suffering doesn’t matter. But we already knew that from how pathetic their reaction has been to the countless numbers of Muslim child rape gangs that have been active with impunity, for the past four decades.


‘He’s been told to go and enjoy himself, when any potential victims may have had their lives ruined. ‘He has committed a crime so he should be punished, not told to go on holiday.’

Oh don’t exaggerate. He isn’t that bad. The UK still doles out proper justice to the real criminals, like the guy who trained his pug to do Roman Salutes and posted a video of it on Youtube.

The UK police and justice system, heroically jump to action, whenever the “real dangerous criminals” start acting up.

The South Shields sex offender pleaded guilty to attempting to engage a child under 16 in sexual activity at a hearing on March 14. The 24-year-old was warned he faced jail by Judge Amanda Rippon, who then agreed to the defence’s request of a delay for the pre-booked break.

Another useless Judge who needs to be removed from her position.

As I said before, we need to start bringing in better judges.

Dark Justice added: ‘It shouldn’t matter if it was pre-booked. ‘If he’s committed a crime, that should be more important than if he’s got a holiday booked.’

This was just common sense a few short years ago. It’s incredible just how quick things have gone to hell.

Unshaven Cook stood largely silent in the dock as he entered his plea at the brief hearing.

A psychiatric report will also be carried out after the court heard the St Cuthbert’s Avenue man suffered from ‘a number of educational and emotional difficulties’.

“He’s the real victim here. He should probably just be released.”

Ordering an all options report, Judge Rippon told him: ‘I’m releasing you on unconditional bail so you are free to go on that holiday with your family. ‘It is possible you may be looking at a jail sentence.’

And if he decides to just not come back from his holiday at all. then “oh well.”

An “ethically dubious deal”.

The following piece of text is an extract from George Lincoln Rockwell’s (leader and founder of the American Nazi party) 1967 book “White Power”. I would suggest that you set aside any emotional preconceptions that you might have in regards to the terms “Nazi” and “White Power”, and just judge what is said on its own merits, rather than on its source.

Off the New England and Gulf Coasts of America, a century or so ago, there
were murderous gangs called “ship wreckers”. The gangs would set up false
lights near real lighthouses, cunningly placed so that suspecting ships
approaching the coast in the dark and in storms would be guided onto deadly

As soon as the ship was smashed, while the captain and crew were trying to
survive the storm, these vultures would pounce on the helpless ship and rob it.

To protect themselves from exposure, the gang murdered every human being

There was nothing complicated in shipwrecking. It was the oldest crime in the
world – murder for what the other man had. The only difference was in the
method of using false lighthouses.

Today, there is abroad in the world an enormous gang operating in almost
every nation doing EXACTLY the same thing as the early ship-wreckers,
except that the modem “ship- wreckers” have added a fremendous complexity
of refinements, and instead of wrecking ships, they wreck whole nations.

They are called “Communists”, or “Marxists”. But basically, the leaders are out
to ROB and murder productive people for loot, just as the ship-wreckers robbed
those who had worked for the ship’s cargo, and then killed them.

Their basic technique, in the end, just as with the ship wreckers, is always
naked violence and murder.

But also, just as with the ship-wreckers, they cannot beat the honest productive
people of the world by sheer force. They also need surprise and guile. That’s
where the chart forgery and the fake lighthouses come in.

The Red gang of ship-wreckers lure decent, honest and sincere people onto the
deadly reefs of Marxist insanity with their fake lighthouses of “brotherhood”,
“peace”, “love”, “democracy”, “equality”. And then they rig all the charts
available to show these fake lighthouses as the ONLY safe guides. Meanwhile,
these robbers and forgers rig all our charts (the press) to show the real, safe channels, in which America sailed to greatness, as the most deadly and
dangerous of all reefs.

Once our civilization has been wrecked, the Red gang plans to loot it, as they
have looted every nation they seize.

In the next chapter, I shall present the fingerprints, footprints, witnesses and
handwriting experts to prove before a jury of my fellow Americans just ‘WHO
these Red ship wreckers, robbers and killers are.

But first, I want to prove THAT THE CAPTAINS OF OUR SHIP OF STATE,

Returning to the coast gangs, a hundred years ago, you can imagine the
additional effectiveness of the crime, if the gangs could install some of their
own criminal members as the captains of the ships approaching the phony

With a fake captain, the unsuspecting ship and crew would have NO chance –
even if some of the navigators began to “smell a rat”.

Any navigator who began to protest too vigorously that dirty work was afoot
could be clapped into irons by the captain, with the full agreement of the other
officers, who could be shown the phony charts. The evidence of dirty work
would be too complex for most other officers and crewmen to see, and they
would be led to believe the captain’s lies, because the captain always has the
phony charts to prove he is right.

That’s precisely what has happened to America’s ship of state.

Men like the great Joe McCarthy were “navigators” who tried to warn the other
officers and crew that the captain and the gang were wrecking the ship.

But the fake captains of our nation have been backed up 1000% by the fake
chart-makers – the press, TV, etc. -and have managed to keep the innocent
victims (the crew and ship) convinced that it was McCarthy who was trying to
wreck America on the rocks, while the crooked captains have been presented as the greatest navigators in the history of the world.

Meanwhile, the same “wonderful” captains have been smashing our ship of
state into one rock after the other, always with brilliant explanations by the
captains, and adoring acceptance of the explanations as the ultimate in
statesmanship, by our crooked chart-makers the press. The American crew
never really has a chance.

Rockwell was describing the situation unfolding in his own country, America, as he saw it, but despite having been written half a century ago, and in relation to a different country, I can’t help but find it strangely prophetic in regards to what is taking place in Ireland right now.

“But…but… I thought the media was fair and impartial, and was supposed to keep government in line. They’ve always told us that themselves.”

From The Times

Concerns have been raised about an “ethically dubious deal” between the government and national newspapers that involves journalists writing positive pieces about the Ireland 2040 plan.

The government’s strategic communications unit arranged for sponsored content to appear in local, regional and national newspapers including the Irish Independent and The Irish Times.

Last week, the cabinet travelled to Sligo to unveil the €116 billion national development plan to prepare for an estimated population growth of one million people over the next two decades. It set out spending plans for infrastructure, transport and housing.

It is understood that a number of journalists at Independent News and Media were asked to write positive news pieces, which could not include negative or critical content.

The rest of the article is behind a paywall, but I think the small extract that is available, makes its point clear. The Irish government has recently unveiled plans, for what it calls “Project Ireland 2040”, which details their goals for the country’s development by the year 2040. On the surface, a lot of the goals seem commendable. Improved services. Improved infrastructure. Development of rural areas. Moving to cleaner and more efficient energy sources, etc. However, there is one part that is cause for alarm.

“In 20 years time, there’ll be an extra million people living in Ireland”.

According to the most recent census, Ireland currently has a population just shy of 4.8 million. A population of that size, cannot produce an additional one million people in just twenty years, just from new births alone. Even when combined with reasonable immigration levels, it can’t possibly produce that many. The only possible way that an increase of that level could occur, is through mass immigration, similar to the rates that are currently being experienced in countries like Sweden and Germany.

And we know how well that has turned out for those countries.

Precedent in other countries has already shown that increased mass migration has resulted in an increase in terrorist attacks, riots, rapes against native women and children, and other forms of violence, which is primarily migrants on natives. There’s no argument against this. It’s just observable reality. Why should Ireland be any different in this regard? How can we expect that somehow it will all work out just fine here, when it hasn’t worked out fine anywhere else? I can say with complete confidence, that if Ireland does go down the same path as other countries in regards to mass immigration, then the same problems will happen here as well. I would bet my own life on that.

And this isn’t even taking into account that Ireland is already experiencing a severe housing crisis as it is. How exactly is Ireland supposed to find housing for an additional one million people, when it can’t even provide enough housing for the population that we already have? It simply can’t be done. All this is going to do is push up the already obscenely high cost of housing even further, because the law of supply and demand dictates that when demand is higher than supply, then the prices will increase.

We have a situation that is going to result in very severe problems for the Irish people in the future. And instead of pointing this reality out, the media is colluding with the government, to keep the truth hidden from us. People are being deceived into going against their own demographic interests, in the name of “tolerance” and “diversity”, and other meaningless buzzwords. It’s all a con. Our so called “leaders” and our “free press” are actively involved in this con, and are working against us.

Exactly as the “Nazi”, George Lincoln Rockwell, pointed out half a century ago.

Peter Sutherland finally passes into Hell, aged 71.

You won’t be missed, you evil piece of shit.

There’s some glorious news today, which coming this early in the year, I hope is a good omen for the rest of 2018. Peter Sutherland, one of the most vile and despicable human beings, that Ireland has ever produced, has finally taken the last breath of his worthless life. I personally have been looking forward to this day for quite some time, but I figured it wouldn’t happen for at least another decade, so this is definitely a pleasant surprise.

That cat is me right now.

I know there’s this whole concept of “do not speak ill of the dead”, but I’ve never understood that. By that logic, we can never speak negatively about Ted Bundy, or Joseph Stalin for example. Just becomes someone dies, doesn’t excuse the type of person they were in life, and Sutherland was not in my opinion, someone that I would call a “good person”.

Peter Sutherland was a leading member of Goldman Sachs, arguably the most greedy and ruthless financial organisation on the planet.  An organisation that makes profit off of the misery of ordinary people. He was a leading voice in promoting the narrative that Ireland had to pay the Anglo Bondholders, one of which was in fact “Goldman Sachs asset Management International”, his own organisation. He didn’t seem to have any problem asking ordinary Irish people to tighten their belts, while our money was stolen from us, in order to reimburse organisations like his for their bad investments.

According to Sutherland, it would be wrong to make Goldman Sachs take the financial hit for making a poor investment, but it was perfectly fine to make his fellow Irish people take the hit, for something they had nothing to do with.

But most importantly of all, Sutherland was a massive shill for globalisation, undermining the national homogeneity of nation states, and importing millions of incompatible savages to the EU, without regard for the consequences for doing so, or for the will of the majority already living here. We’ve seen how that has turned out. Like all the big players behind this goal, he hid behind the guise of “humanitarianism” when promoting it. That it was our obligation to help the poor unfortunate “refugees” desperately fleeing for their lives from their own countries. The fact that he did this while having a leading position in Goldman Sachs, an organisation that profits off of war and asset stripping the third world, is neither here nor there. Apparently, you can still play the part of humanitarian while involved in that sort of thing, and anybody who is suspicious of your true motives, is just a “racist”.

But yeah, I never bought into the narrative that he was just a concerned humanitarian, trying to help the same people that his organisation was making profits off of harming. What I saw was nothing more, than a cold-hearted psychopath, who was cynically preying on the altruism of ordinary people, in order to push a globalist agenda which was beneficial to him and his kind, but not in the interests of the ordinary people that he was pushing it on. As far as I’m concerned, every Irish person who committed suicide due to financial despair in the years since the bailout. Every woman and child who was raped by a Muslim migrant that entered Europe illegally. Every victim of a terrorist attack in Europe that occurred as a direct result of the open borders policies that Peter Sutherland championed. Their blood is at least partially on his hands, and he never showed any sign that he was even slightly remorseful in light of the damage that was done.

And this is why I’m glad this piece of shit is finally dead.

An artist’s rendition of what Sutherland is likely experiencing right now.

The question is, who’ll be next?

*fingers crossed*

The insanity behind the Libyan slave markets.

I’ve noticed recently that a lot of “normies” on social media, have finally caught up on something that those of us who have been paying attention, have been aware of for quite some time already. That is, they’ve finally become aware of the existence of slave markets operating quite openly in Libya, and in typical normie fashion, are virtue signalling about how “appalled” and “outraged” they are, and about how “something needs to be done” about it. Of course, as is to be expected, none of them seem to show any indication that they care to educate themselves as to “how and why” this whole thing has come about in the first place. They just care about how they can exploit it to present themselves as good and virtuous people, who “care” about their fellow human beings.


To really understand what has been going on in this world is to acknowledge the self evident reality of the following statement. Everything of significance that is taking place in the world, when looked at from a purely logical perspective, is completely insane. The events that led up to, and the reaction following the revelation of these Libyan slave markets, is no exception to this rule.

Lets really analyse what actually happened. In October 2011, Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, was overthrown after an 8 month long “civil war”, and after having ruled the country for more than 40 years. I use the term “civil war” quite loosely, because in general, a “civil war” refers to a war between citizens of the same country. In the case of Libya, much like in Syria (and which I covered in detail about a year ago), it wasn’t so much a war between fellow citizens, as it was a war between the legitimate Libyan government, and a bunch of terrorists and mercenaries, armed, trained, and financed, by foreign powers which were at odds with the Libyan government, led by NATO.

So the question then becomes, “why were these foreign powers against Gaddafi’s rule?”. The official reason given of course was that Gaddafi was a brutal monster who was oppressing his people and that he needed to be eliminated, so that democracy could be installed. Does that sound familiar? It’s pretty much the same narrative they’ve used with Assad in Syria, or a decade earlier with Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the latter of which, they supported in the 1980s btw when he was fighting against their arch-nemesis, Iran. I guess it doesn’t matter how brutal a dictator someone is, when he’s useful to them. It only becomes a problem when he’s no longer useful. But then again, as I’ve stated time and time again, this is completely obvious, just from looking at the undying support that the West gives to Saudi Arabia, arguably the most barbaric regime on the planet.

Such a great and trusted ally.

The thing is, I’m not even denying that Gaddafi was a dictator, or that democracy was lacking in Libya. What I am saying is that the Western elites, their puppet politicians, and the controlled mainstream media which pushes their agendas with their propaganda, don’t actually care about any of this. If they did, they would never support a country like Saudi Arabia, nor would they have supported Saddam Hussein in the 1980s, just because he was useful at the time. They just cynically use the “we’re liberating the ordinary people and bringing democracy” narrative, as an excuse to push wars and regime changes that promote their real agendas, because they’re smart enough to know that if the general public knew what the real reasons were for these constant wars, they would never support them.

So in regards to Libya specifically, what was the agenda? There are various different agendas that are the motivating factor for actions in the world at any given time, but with Libya specifically, it was opposition (most notably in the US and France) to Gaddafi’s proposal to create a gold backed currency, which would have helped the African people, and threatened the supremacy of the US Dollar and the Euro. That is why he had to go, and that is why people like Hillary Clinton were so happy when he was gone.

Before the war, Libyan people were for the most part, quite well looked after by the Gaddafi regime. Free healthcare, education, electricity, etc. That’s not to say that the country was some kind of paradise on Earth. I have heard it suggested that the standards of healthcare and education were quite poor, and that many of the other entitlements that Libyan citizens could avail of, such as the $50,000 grant given to newlyweds to help them start a family, were a bureaucratic nightmare to claim, but the point is, they existed. Compare the failed state that exists now, were terrorists control large territories, and slave markets exist out in the open, to the country that existed under Gaddafi and ask yourself honestly. Did the Western intervention in the country really improve things?

After Gaddafi’s defeat, and Libya’s descent into failed state status, what has been described as the “biggest refugee crisis since WW2” kicked off. Of course as I’ve mentioned more times than I count, it isn’t technically a refugee crisis, as the vast majority of the so called “refugees” aren’t coming to Europe to escape danger, but instead, coming for economic reasons. Gaddafi himself even warned us that this would happen if he was taken out.

We should have listened.

So these people were attempting to get into Europe anyway, long before the Libyan and Syrian civil wars, but Gaddafi’s regime had always kept them out. However, these wars then became an excuse to justify these migrations, and Angela Merkel only encouraged it further, with her blanket invitation to the entire third world to come live in Europe. The consequences of this migrant crisis have included, but are not limited to:

  • Migrants drowning en route to Europe.
  • Migrants getting enslaved.
  • European women getting raped en masse by migrants who do make it to Europe.
  • Huge riots involving migrants.
  • A massive financial and political strain on the countries dealing with the migrants the most.

So just think about what has happened, what we’ve been told in the media, what we can see going on with our own eyes, and remember my earlier statement in this article in which I said…

“Everything of significance that is taking place in the world, when looked at from a purely logical perspective, is completely insane.”

  • The US and their NATO allies, are aligned with Saudi Arabia, but at the same time, claim they took out Gaddafi because he was a brutal dictator who oppressed his people.
  • Libya went from having some of the best living standards in Africa, to being a failed state because of this, and a country were slavery is practiced openly.
  • Those involved actually try to claim with a straight face, that this was done for the benefit of the Libyan people, and that they’re somehow better off now than they were living under Gaddafi with their free education, healthcare, electricity, etc.
  • Hillary Clinton was heavily involved in causing this, and celebrated what happened, yet was promoted by the media as someone fit to be President of the most powerful country in the world.
  • Obama was in power at the time that it did happen, and his administration (which included Hillary) was largely responsible for what happened. The media treats Obama like a saint, who is above all criticism.
  • Angela Merkel invites the entire third world to come to Europe, which encourages them to make the perilous journey, and results in people either drowning, getting enslaved, or if they do make it, become a heavily resented burden for the ordinary European people. The media celebrates Merkel as a great leader, even declaring her the “leader of the free world”, in light of Trump’s presidential victory.
  • Normies have no understanding of what is actually going on and continue to demand “more refugees” be let into Europe, even though they aren’t fleeing from danger, but are instead fleeing TO danger, by ending up in a situation were there is a good chance they’ll either end up enslaved, or drowned. Normies think they’re doing good by voicing their support like this.
  • These same normies who are so vehemently opposed to what is going on in Libya currently, also tend to support people like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who are responsible for causing the mess in the first place, and are either too ignorant to the facts, or too hypocritical to care.

So when you really look at what has happened, how the media tries to spin things, and how normal people react to things, then is it not clear?


Three violent incidents in a two day period.

*sigh*, will the counter ever stop being reset?

So we’re all well aware of what happened in Spain, but apparently Spain wasn’t the only European country to be “culturally enriched” lately. I would just like to offer my heartfelt condolences to *checks sheet of paper*.. ah yes, Helsinki and Berlin. Much like what happened the night before in *checks sheet again*… Barcelona, yes, these are terrible tragedies, but we must not allow them to change how we think. Diversity is our greatest strength afterall, and attacks like these must not divide us. Our diversity is what unifies us. Yes, division equals unity. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

From Times of India

HELSINKI/BERLIN: In two separate incidents of stabbings on Friday, two people were killed and six injured in the Finnish city of Turku, while another man was hacked to death in the western German city of Wuppertal.

The Finnish Police shot one suspect in the legs and arrested him. Security forces wrote on Twitter that police were “looking for other possible perpetrators”.

One killed in stabbing in western Germany, attacker on the run

Police confirmed that one man was stabbed to death and another injured in Wuppertal, adding that the attacker was still on the loose.

Police in Germany said they were hunting for one or more assailants, but could not immediately provide more information about the circumstances of the attack

The stabbing happened at around 1245 GMT in the city’s Elberfeld area.

Both the incidents come a day after 14 people were killed in twin terror attacks in Spain.

You know, I haven’t been posting a whole lot recently, because as I mentioned, I’m somewhat burned out on everything that has been happening. I know that there were a couple of incidents in France recently for example, that I didn’t even bother writing about. The fact is, these sorts of incidents are nothing unusual anymore. They happen on a damn near weekly basis at this point, and if you add in all the other types of “enrichment”, such as acid attacks, rapes, Muslim grooming gangs etc, you’re pretty much seeing multiple events taking place all over Europe every single day. It’s impossible to discuss them all, let alone think of anything original to say about them each time.

However, these three separate attacks all followed closely on the heels of the incident in Charlottesville, when a quote, unquote, “white supremacist”, plowed his car into a crowd of “peaceful counter-protesters”, killing one in the process. I think it makes an interesting comparison to see the reaction in the mainstream media and on social media to the Charlottesville incident, and then to compare it to the reaction to the typical Islamic terror attacks, like the three most recent ones.

First of all, lets just give a little background context as to what was actually going on in Charlottesville. In the past few years in America, there has been this obsession on the far left, with tearing down monuments and symbols associated with the Confederacy, because they consider these monuments to be a glorification of slavery, and therefore consider them to be “racist” and “oppressive”.

george-orwell-1984-every-record-has-been-destroyed-or-falsified-25408969.pngHowever, there are a lot of other people who don’t consider these monuments offensive, but rather consider them a part of their heritage, and are against their removal. People like this are worried about a possible slippery slope occurring. If these monuments are offensive because of their association with slavery, then what’s to stop people from later finding other icons of American history offensive? Afterall, George Washington himself was a slave owner, so whose to say that these unhinged lunatics won’t eventually be calling for Mount Rushmore to be blown up, and for everything named after Washington, including their capital city no less, to be renamed to something “less offensive” and “more inclusive”? Indeed, as this video from Mark Dice shows, some already are making these demands.

So people who actually take pride in their history and their heritage, and who have realised from experience that these hate-filled lunatics will never be satisfied and will only keep pushing for more, had decided that enough was enough, and that they were going to protest against the planned removal of these monuments. So they organised a march to protest this and even went through the proper channels and obtained a permit. However, the city attempted to revoke this permit. This decision was appealed and a federal judge ruled that revoking the permit would be a violation of the protesters first amendment rights, thus over-ruling the decision of the city’s officials.

So many different groups of people, with many different agendas, united by their common interest in preserving the monuments, turned up to this protest. This did indeed include legitimate white supremacists, KKK, and Neo-Nazi types, but with the way American law works, there’s nothing illegal about having any particular political ideology, no matter how offensive it might be. As long as these groups protested peacefully, there was nothing that could be done to them. Many of them did turn up to the protest armed however, and detractors are citing this as “proof” that violence was their goal all along. However, I don’t believe this was the case at all.

Whenever any groups of white people turn up to protest in favour of their group interests, or attend speeches by people who campaign for them, these events are always attended by Antifa and other groups, who have the intended goal of shutting them down, usually employing extreme violence to do so. Indeed, I’ve discussed this sort of thing before, when the gay, half-Jew, black cock obsessed Milo (whose also apparently a Neo-Nazi, white supremacist), was giving a speech in Berkeley, and Antifa rioted against the event. So knowing that violent Antifa thugs were guaranteed to show up and engage in violence as they normally do, does it not make sense to arm yourselves in anticipation? The weapons weren’t brought in order to start trouble. They were brought as a defensive measure, in preparation for when Antifa did.

They do this every single time.

So sure enough, Antifa and other violent leftist groups showed up to the event as counter-protesters. Then the police, most likely under the orders of city officials themselves, made the whole situation worse. As I already mentioned, the city had attempted to revoke the protester’s permits, but was over-ruled by a federal judge. However, even though the federal judge ruled that they were allowed to protest, the police decided half way through that the march was “unlawful” and ordered the protesters to disperse. I’ve even heard it suggested that after ordering them to disperse, that the police deliberately herded the protesters right towards the counter-protesters, were they were free to take cheap shots at them with baseball bats as they walked by. Indeed, video footage seems to confirm this.

Go to roughly 51:44 to see the protesters being marched out single file by the police, past the counter-protesters, and watch as the counter-protesters start throwing things at them and hitting them with bats.

So eventually the violence gets to a point were one of the alt-right guys plows through a crowd in his car, injuring many and killing one of them. As soon as this happened, the media leapt on it and started declaring it a “terrorist attack” immediately. However, can we really be certain that this was the case? Terrorism has a very specific definition. It’s about using violence and intimidation in order to pursue an ideological objective. When a Muslim runs over a crowd of people, yelling “Allahu Akbar” while doing so, it’s obvious that his motivation is ideologically based, and therefore fits the definition of terrorism.

Well, it’s obvious to most people.

The problem is, we can’t be certain that this guy ran over the crowd for ideological reasons, at least not until it is properly investigated. With all the violence and chaos going on, he may simply have done so in a panic, trying to escape from it. Alternatively, maybe he did do it on purpose, but it could have been as a result of road rage, due to the anger he felt from having his car attacked by the counter-protesters. Or maybe it is a genuine terrorist attack and he did so in support of the ideology of white supremacy. The point is, we don’t know yet if it does fit the definition of terrorism, but the media doesn’t care, because they are determined to promote their narrative that “white supremacists” are the most dangerous group of terrorists of all, and in order to do that, they need to have a few examples of white supremacist terrorists.

Anders Breivik was a pretty long time ago by now. They need some fresher examples of white supremacist terrorists that they can cite.

So Trump comes out and condemns the violence and hatred on both sides, and the media goes into hysteria, because he doesn’t condemn “white supremacists” specifically. As far as the media is concerned, condemning both sides equally, when both sides were engaged in violence (and the other side were the ones who started it no less), is the same thing to them as if he had condoned the white supremacists.

So eventually he does come out and condemn white supremacists specifically, and the media still isn’t satisfied, because he didn’t do it quickly enough, or with enough enthusiasm for their liking. This of course is nothing new. Back during the election campaign, they made a big deal about white supremacists endorsing him, and his apparent “refusal to disavow them”, even though he disavowed them constantly.

So lets look at a few of the double standards we’re seeing on display here.

  • Muslims constantly commit terrorist acts in white majority countries. The media tries to downplay them as being due to “mental illness” on the part of the attackers. White guy who may or may not be a white supremacist (for all we know, he’s just someone who wants to preserve the statues), runs over a crowd one time. Media instantly claims that it was an act of terrorism, before the facts are even established.
  • Whenever a Muslim terrorist attack happens, the narrative is always that it’s just a tiny minority who do it, and that it doesn’t reflect Islam as a whole. The media calls for tolerance and understanding towards Muslims, and condemns anyone who speaks out as a “racist” or an “Islamophobe”. White people stand up for their own group interests, peacefully 99% of the time. The 1% of the time were violence does happen and the media condemns every single person with any belief in pursuing white interests, and tars them all with the slurs of “white supremacist” or “Neo-Nazi”, and demands action be taken against them.
  • Antifa and Black Lives Matter, constantly riot and violently attack people, whose political opinions they disagree with. Media downplays them as being “peaceful protests”, and any violence is from a “small minority, which doesn’t represent the movement as a whole”. White nationalists attempt to have a genuinely peaceful protest, get attacked by Antifa, and then fight back to defend themselves from this violence. They’re all violent thugs, and every member of the movement is bad. There are no good people pursuing white interests. They’re all white supremacists, and they’re all automatically violent, just because of their beliefs, even if they don’t commit any actual acts of violence.
  • Hillary/Obama/Bernie Sanders supporters, make up the ranks of Antifa and BLM, and are constantly involved in violence. The media doesn’t demand that anyone of them disavow the support of these groups. Meanwhile the media constantly demands that Trump disavows the support of “white supremacists” (ie, anyone who believes that white people have a right to pursue their own political interests), and as the video above shows, they don’t even listen to him when he does disavow their support anyway.

When you look at the reaction to what happened in Charlottesville, you would think the world itself was ending, and that this is one of the worst things to ever happen. Yet, we’ve seen months of violent riots from Antifa groups, months of violent riots from Black Lives Matter groups, and countless examples of Muslim terrorist attacks, including at least three in the past two days alone, and none of it ever generates even a fraction of the outrage that this Charlottesville incident has. This suggests that Charlottesville specifically holds special significance to the media, and the only logical explanation, is that the reason why it holds special significance, is because of the groups involved.

What people need to understand, is that none of this is an accident, nor is it a case that the media is simply too “politically correct” and cowardly, to address these issues honestly. No, this is completely deliberate and malicious in its intent. The mainstream media in the Western world, does not exist for the purpose of keeping the population informed about what is actually going on. In fact, it exists for the exact opposite purpose.

In reality, our civilisations have been infiltrated by an enemy that wants to exterminate and replace us all. In order to ensure this extermination occurs, it needs to keep us misinformed and asleep to what is actually happening. As long as we’re unaware, we can’t resist. When Muslim terrorists are constantly killing us, it runs the risk of waking us up, so they deliberately try to downplay what is happening, so that we don’t rise up and demand their removal. When white people protest in favour of our group interests, they deliberately send groups like Antifa and BLM to violently shut us down, and then use their control of the supply of information, to pretend that these Antifa and BLM types are peaceful protesters, rather than the vicious thugs that they really are. When white people come together simply to stand up for our own group interests, against the Muslims who are killing us, or the perpetually offended special snowflakes who want to strip us of our history, they create blatantly false narratives about us, claiming that we’re the violent ones, or that we’re the supremacists, simply for defending ourselves. When we elect a leader who campaigns on representing our interests, and actually tries to do what we want, they use their control of the media to constantly attack him, to destroy his reputation, and to pressure him into disavowing us, in the hopes of creating a divide between him and his base of support.

None of this is an accident. Just think about it honestly. Do you really honestly believe that they could be reporting so much wrong, just by mistake, or that it’s just a coincidence that they always just happen to condemn the right-wing white groups, and defend the non-white and the left-wing groups, no matter which side is the one who is actually in the wrong? No, it’s not a coincidence. It’s done on purpose, because the media is nothing more than a propaganda tool that is under the control of a small and hostile minority, that is at war with the ordinary citizens of their countries.

Now, if only we knew just who that enemy could be.