The “most Swedish” story I ever read.

Why does this keep happening? I keep thinking to myself that I’ve heard the very worst from Sweden, and that they’ll never manage to sink any lower in my eyes. Yet somehow, they always manage to find new ways to amaze me with the depths they have managed to sink. Scraping the bottom of the barrel? Oh please, Sweden managed to scrape away the very surface of the barrel itself, and then managed to scrape away the Earth underneath were the barrel was standing, and come out the other side in Australia. This has got to be it. There couldn’t possibly be another story that sums up the dire situation in Sweden, better than this one.

SpP6SFz.jpg

At least, I’m saying that now. If history has taught me anything, it is to never expect Sweden to finally stop shocking me. I’m sure they’ll eventually have an even worse story than this one.

From Politicoat

Gothenburg, Sweden – The first ever man-free music festival kicked off in Gothenburg last week as a result of migrant sexual assaults at music events in years past. 

I’m pretty sure I covered that story myself actually. Or possibly a story very similar to it. I have no way of being sure, I mean there are so many stories about Sweden,and I’ve covered so many myself, I honestly can’t keep track anymore.

DJI9EpjXgAA9TDB

As the 2018 Bravalla music festival was canceled due to rapes by Arabic and African welfare migrants in previous years,

SSSHHH!!!

You aren’t supposed to name their ethnicity.

the 2018 man-free Gothenburg music festival was heralded as the “most progressive in history” because attendees, performers, journalists, and even police providing security for the event had to be female.

Yes and we all know how well the Female police have done in Sweden.

“Sir, sir. Please cooperate. Sir. Don’t test me sir. I learned how to defend myself in Finland.

“We expected thousands of women to attend as a certain testosterone, I mean certain tension had been lifted,” said event spokesperson Rebecka Ljung touting the concert a “safe zone for all women”.

A safe zone you say? Were certain people are kept out? You mean… like a border perhaps?

Although the two-day music festival banned men, transgenders were welcome as festival organizers gleefully accepted any male depressed and crazy enough to pump himself full of psychotropic and hormone-altering drugs trying to convince himself he is a woman.

I bet you can already predict the plot twist already.

News of the all-female (and transgender male) music festival spread fast as Swedish media eager to tout hatred for western civilization provided non-stop coverage leading up to the event.

Here it comes…

Knowledge about the festival, in fact, became so widespread hoards of foreign welfare migrants looting and burning cars in the streets of Gothenburg took time away from destroying Sweden to attend the event in hopes of making involuntary sexual contact with female concertgoers.

And how did that plan turn out, you might ask?

Well…

Initially, the all-male migrant gangs were turned away from the man-free music festival

Wow that’s a shocker.

but quickly gained access after contending they were ‘awakened Muslim transgender non-men’.

But that sure isn’t.

As gangs of these ‘Muslim transgender non-men’ made their way through crowds of female concertgoers, ‘non-problems’ began to occur as scores of women were maybe kind of certain something had happened to them.

“At first a lot of women were angry about all these men coming into our women-only event and sexually assaulting everyone, but then the men told us they were Muslim transgenders,” said a 27-year-old festival attendee who endured the diversity she received at the hands of her attackers in order not to offend Muslims or transgenders.

As the immigrant transgenders continued to diversify concert goers, Swedish female police officers in attendance were powerless to stop the consensual assaults in fear of being reprimanded by their superiors for intolerance and discrimination against migrants.

“Many women attending the music festival, including our own officers, were not familiar with the term Muslim transgenders.  In the interest of Swedish acceptance and compassion for all ideas, opinions, people, plants, and animals our officers decided to supervise these diversifications instead of adopting a stance of intolerance and bigotry,” said Sweden’s National Police Commissioner Dan Eliasson in regards to hoards of Arabic and African illiterates having their way with scores of female Swedes.

A bunch of women were getting sexually assaulted by Muslim men who pretended to be transgender. The women themselves put up with it, and the police refused to do anything to stop it, because both groups were afraid of being thought of as transphobic or racist.

this-is-sweden-sweden-let-in-a-ton-of-migrants-1666237Can you see what I mean when I said that this is probably the “most Swedish” story that I’ve ever read?

To date, none of the so-called transgender migrants who diversified female festival-goers have been arrested or even questioned about their actions during the concert.

And I doubt any of them ever will be either.

But if you think the story couldn’t possibly get anymore absurd, then read on for the conclusion, which really pushes it over the edge.

Several Swedish male nationals were, however, taken into custody for disturbing the peace. During the music festival news of the migrant transgender diversification of female concertgoers spread over Facebook and other social media streaming services.

As Enraged fathers, brothers, husbands, and boyfriends of female attendees entered the concert venue to stop transgender migrants from diversifying their daughters, wives, sisters, and girlfriends several were arrested by police on charges of assault, racial and preferential identity discrimination which can levy a term of twenty years in prison under Swedish law.

So lets just summarise this story once again.

  • Sweden throws open their borders to the very worst countries in the world, and sees their rates of rape and sexual assault skyrocket as a result.
  • Sweden stops recording crimes based on ethnicity, and pretends it’s just a problem with men in general. Coincidentally, all Swedish men became rapists at around the same time as Sweden starts seeing a massive increase in migration from Africa and the Middle East.
  • They set up women’s only music festivals, so women won’t experience sexual assault.
  • Muslim men hear about the festival and get in by claiming to be transgender.
  • Muslim men start sexually assaulting the women in the women’s only festival.
  • The Women themselves do nothing, for fear of appearing intolerant to migrants / transgender people.
  • The police do nothing, for fear of appearing intolerant to migrants / transgender people.
  • The men who engaged in sexual assault are not arrested.
  • Fathers, husbands, brothers, and boyfriends of the sexually assaulted women try to defend them. They do get arrested.

I can’t even be angry when I read stories like this anymore. It’s just too insane for my mind to even make sense of.All I can do is just sit here and try my best to make sense of it all.

Advertisements

UK: “Universities need to hand out more degrees to black students, just because…”

F0Km61h.png

“Diversity is our greatest strength. We don’t need to explain why this is. We just know it to be true. Just like how we know that the sun revolves around the earth, and only racists heretics would ever question the obvious wisdom of that”.

Well it seems that diversity is being threatened in the UK. For reasons that are completely unexplainable (but most likely caused by racism), black students are failing to graduate from university at the same rate as their white counterparts. Because diversity and equality of outcome are more important than holding everyone to the same high standards as each other, something needs to be done about this ASAP.

From The Telegraph

Universities could be punished unless they give a higher proportion of top degrees to black students, under new proposals drawn up by the regulator.

Notice how there’s no mention of a requirement for the black students having to actually achieve the grades necessary to earn a top degree? They just have to be given it anyway.

174wq9.jpg
Yep. Aren’t you so oppressed?

The Office for Students (OfS) has announced plans to overhaul its guidelines for boosting diversity in higher education, in what it says is the “biggest shake up” since 2004.

Are they ever going to explain why  boosting “diversity” is such an important thing to do? What are the actual benefits of this increased diversity? Why is it so essential? Why do we need it so badly, that we need to do away with “fairness”, and “merit” in order to achieve it? In what ways will the benefits of this increased diversity, outweigh the benefits of maintaining the current high standards?

1484264206575

They will never answer these questions, because quite frankly, there is no logical answer to them. This is purely based on ideology, rather than common sense.

If institutions fail to comply with the regulator’s new “tougher” national targets for increasing the number of disadvantaged students, they could be penalised through a fine or even de-registered.

So they say it’s about helping “disadvantaged” students, but at the same time, are specifically focusing on race, rather than economic background. As far as they’re concerned, a black student from a rich family is disadvantaged, when compared to a white student from a poor family. Of course, anyone with any knowledge of what is going on, knows this is not really about helping students from disadvantaged backgrounds. It’s simply about hurting the prospects of white people.

Chris Millward, the OfS director for fair access and participation, said that universities will no longer be able to “mark their own homework” on their plans to up their intake of 18-year-olds from poor backgrounds.  

Instead, the new regulator, which came into force earlier this year, plans to set a series of national targets that all universities will be expected to meet.   

These will not be limited to targets for admitting more school leavers from deprived households, but will also include addressing the gap in degree attainment between black and white students, according to OfS proposals.

They never consider the idea of investigating WHY this gap in degree attainment exists in the first place. Understanding the root causes of the gap and trying to go from there to solve it, is not part of the agenda. Instead, they just want to manipulate the results and achieve equality of outcome without an equality of merit.

NmWXEKF.png

There has been an almost 50 per cent increase in the number of black and ethnic minority students in England between 2007 and 2016.

“Mass, replacement level immigration is just a Neo-Nazi, white supremacist, conspiracy theory.”

78 per cent of white students graduated last year with a first class of upper second class degree, compared to just 53 per cent of black students.

“Racism must be the cause for this. There couldn’t possibly be another explanation.”

Qualifications before attending university, although a key factor in degree outcomes, do not explain the differences between ethnic groups, according to data analysed by Universities UK.

No, but I’ve got a theory on what could explain the difference instead.

bell curve.jpg

In a consultation document, published today, the regulator sets out a number of areas that universities should work on, such as combatting the higher drop-out rate among poorer students compared to their middle-class peers.  

Mr Millward said: “Universities have always set their own targets, and have used different measures of success. They were kind of marking their own homework.

“We are going to set clearer national targets which they will refer to: not just looking at access but do students finish their courses? What is their degree outcome depending on background?”

I can guarantee you that this will all fail miserably. Governments are too incompetent to make anything work right.

Mr Millward said that universities have spent hundreds of millions of pounds on measures aimed at diversifying their intake of students, but have paid little or no attention to whether their schemes were effective. 

Hundreds of millions of pounds down the toilet in order to pursue this obsession with diversity, and we’ve still yet to hear an explanation about why this diversity is even desirable. Be perfectly honest with yourself. Even ignoring  the financial cost, and just focusing on everything else that has happened, has any country at all benefited from increased diversity? Has Sweden benefited? Has Germany? Has Italy? Has France? Has the UK? Has *insert any country here*? Seriously, what are the actual benefits of this diversity? Will anyone ever actually answer the question?

“I don’t doubt that universities are committed to improving access. They are spending a lot of money and doing a lot but they don’t understand enough about whether it’s working,” he told The Daily Telegraph.

It’s never going to work. Just like the way the first world has thrown trillions of dollars at Africa in foreign  aid and development over the past 50 years, and if anything, a lot of the countries there are going backwards rather than forwards.  You can keep throwing money at the problem all you want, but it’s never going to make a difference, because a lack of funding is not the cause.

“We are upping the expectation on evaluation. Once we know that, we can target [budgets] where it can make a difference.”

Failure

Last year, universities spent a total of around £800 million on projects to increase access and around half of this was spent on bursaries for students from poor households.

“I’m not arguing against bursaries being provided, particularly because students can be really challenged by the cost when they are at university,” Mr Millward said.

And yet despite spending that much money, they’re no closer to solving the “”problem”.

“But there is very little evidence that bursaries improve access. That is a really obvious areas where we need to evaluate. [We need to] ask why it is spent and what impact it is having?”

HOLY SHIT!!!

He actually said something that I agree with.

Dr Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, said he welcomes the emphasis on evaluation

“There is a great deal of activity to improve access taking place across the sector but what we need now is a clear overview of which interventions make the biggest difference,” he said. “We need to be clearer on what works, and what doesn’t, if we are to shift the dial.”

Unfortunately, they’re not going to use the scientific method when trying to figure this situation out. They will automatically refuse to consider certain possibilities, limit the scope of what they will actually investigate, fail to find a possible solution, and either just go back to throwing money at the problem (and getting nowhere in the process), or just creating a two tier system, were black students are held to lower standards than white students, and see their graduation rate increase that way instead.

And this is what they call “”Equality”.

Ireland might make its gender recognition laws looser.

134tfj
If only things were this simple in *current year*

For a long time, I’ve tried my best to understand and make sense of the transgender issue, but even after all this time, I’m still no closer to doing so. It’s not that I don’t feel any sense of sympathy or compassion for what these people are going through. It’s just that after all this time, I’ve yet to see any compelling scientific evidence that a quote, unquote “sex change” actually does meet the criteria for turning people into the opposite sex. As far as I can see, all it does is take vulnerable people with severe mental health problems, irreparably mutilate their bodies, and turn them into a poor imitation of what they aspire to be.

1xpgpg
I would say that you need to check into your local Miniluv for re-education, so we can fix those doubleplusungood thoughts of yours.

Yet despite these very real reasons that make many people, myself included, feel skeptical, the issue only seems to be getting more attention and becoming a much bigger deal, with absolutely no attempt being made to address our skepticisms . I think really since around the time that Bruce Jenner transitioned, the issue has been heavily pushed by the media and the political establishment as the next big “civil rights frontier” to overcome. We’re led to believe that the reason why we’re hearing so much more about it today is because of “greater awareness”, “greater understanding”, and that more transpeople are “finding the courage” to come forward because of this.

I personally don’t buy it myself. I am not a scientist, so I don’t have the empirical evidence to back up what I’m about to say, but this is my own personal belief, based on observation and contemplation. I personally believe that there are two different kinds of transgender people, similar in a way to how there are two different types of diabetes. Type A, are people who are born with their brain wired differently than what is typical for their biological sex. These people are naturally transgender, and make up that tiny minority who have always existed. There’s probably no way that these people will ever be able to come to terms with their biological sex, and while I don’t personally think that transitioning is a good idea in general, it’s probably the best solution for addressing their specific cases.

Type B on the other hand are a product of nurture rather than nature, and are I believe, the vast majority of cases, particularly the cases that have come in the past few years. The average human brain is not fully developed until around the age of 25 and even then, neuroplasticity, is a thing. The human brain can rewire itself based on external stimuli. Therefore, is it really that hard to consider the possibility that when the media is heavily pushing something, and SJW parents and teachers are encouraging it, that this can have an effect on how children think, and this could be what actually accounts for the massive rise in transgender kids the last few years?

1
The article doesn’t even attempt to answer the question in the headline at all. It does however draw attention to the fact that the number of children looking to transition increased by 1000% in just 5 years. Why isn’t this a cause for alarm exactly?
1
My guess, is promoting it so hard at a time when society is collapsing. When life sucks, and people don’t understand why exactly, is it really hard to believe that they might conclude that the problem is something internal rather than external? “I’m not unhappy because I live in a fucked up world. I must be unhappy because of my gender identity. If I transition, I’ll feel better.”

What a strange coincidence here. The parent is trans, and the child is too. Clearly the child came to this decision zirself, and not because of the prompting of the parent.

So if my theory is correct, and the majority of the recent transgender cases fall into the Type B category, then would it not be logical to try and prevent these kids from dealing with the mental health issues in the first place, and potentially have to undergo the highly damaging surgery, by not glamourising it so much, and by not drawing so much attention to it? If it wasn’t being pushed so heavily, there would be much less cases of the Type B, and therefore much less children having to suffer the associated problems of struggling with their gender identity. By all means, have facilities in place to try and identify and help those who fall into the Type A category, but as things stand, the media and activists conflate both the majority Type B and the minority Type A into one category, and in my opinion, this is completely wrong.

JLB-Meme-Transgender.jpg
What could possibly go wrong? You know other than the possibility that they might fall into the 70-80%, who end up changing their minds and regretting their transition.

Anyway, that was a pretty long introduction to what is in fact, a very brief article that I wished to share.

From Irish Examiner

A review of Ireland’s gender recognition laws is to be brought before the Cabinet this morning.

It reportedly recommends making it easier for children to change their gender.

17884223_1371722649532891_868922556377170949_n
Sounds legit.

Commissioned by Social Protection Minister Regina Doherty, it is understood the report recommends letting children officially change their gender without going to court.

Regina Doherty, who is a high ranking member of Ireland’s Fine Gael party.

Never forget, that Fine Gael are supposed to be Ireland’s “right wing conservative party”. They brought Ireland the Gay Marriage referendum. They brought Ireland the Abortion referendum. They’ve talked about making free (ie., tax-payer funded) contraception readily available. Our current Taoiseach is best buds with that snivelling worm, Justin Trudeau. And now, we’re getting this rhetoric from them.

But yeah people are still delusional enough to think that they’re totally a right wing conservative party, because the Overton window has moved so far to the left, that full on Communists are now mainstream, and centrist parties like Fine Gael, seem far right in comparison.

Children under 16 would be allowed to register the change on documents as long as they have parental consent.

Parental consent? Oh dear that’s such an outdated attitude to have. Why should parents have any say in any life changing decisions that their children wish to make? I think maybe Leo should take some advice from how things are done in the country of his good buddy Trudeau.

dirjfee0cb811
“Taking children away from their parents is OK… except when Trump does it to illegal immigrants of course.”

It would take the decision out of the courts unless there is a situation where one parent does not consent to the change or if there are mental health concerns.

I’m sure we can guess which parent the court will side with in such a scenario.

There have been calls for the minister to publish the report findings, which will likely be done after it is noted by Cabinet this morning.

I look forward to seeing the report. Actually to be honest, I really don’t care.

I can’t see this situation ending well at all. I can see many vulnerable kids with mental health problems, being encouraged to do something that is not in their best interests at all. And then when they end up realising that they’ve made a mistake, as so many do, and feel as if suicide is their only option, because they’ve destroyed their bodies and ruined their lives, do you think those who encouraged them, are going to accept any responsibility for it? Do you think they’ll honestly reflect on their own behaviour and think “maybe it was a bad idea to encourage this”?

I personally don’t think they will.

“Ireland is not totalitarian enough”

Part of a “vulnerable” group? Congratulations, you’re considered “More equal”.

A little over two years ago, I wrote a post, that dealt with an article demanding that Ireland bring in “Hate Crime” legislation. I gave my thoughts on the topic then, and I am forced to do so yet again today, because the topic is back on the agenda.

From Irish Examiner

Ireland has the highest rate of hate crime against people of African descent and transgender people in the EU.

No statistics or details on how this information was obtained are provided in this article whatsoever. We aren’t told how many so called “hate crimes” have occurred, what exactly constitutes a “hate crime”, nor are we told how this data was even collected or analysed. Feel free to read the rest of the article and see for yourself if you don’t believe me.

A new report also criticises the fact that hate crime is not recognised in Irish law.

And why should it be? A crime is a crime, and a victim is a victim. Lets say I was out one night and I decided to attack an innocent man just for fun. I severely injure him, and am rightfully convicted of assault, and get a 5 year prison sentence. Now lets imagine another scenario, were I’m out one night and I decide to attack an innocent gay man, just because he’s gay. I inflict the exact same injuries on him as I inflicted on the person in the first scenario, but this time I’m given a 10 year prison sentence, because of the added “hate” element to the crime. What is the actual justification for this? My crime is just as brutal in both cases, and my victim suffers just as much, so why should the sentence be any different?

South Park pointed out the stupidity of this concept years ago.

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties is calling for the urgent introduction of regulations in this area.

Another parasitic group that has to justify its own worthless existence. I wonder where they get their funding from.

Untitled
Open Society Foundation? Why am I not surprised?

For those who aren’t aware, the Open Society Foundation, is an organisation founded and run by the evil Demon, George Soros (whose subversive and destructive activities I’ve covered here.)

I’d also suggest watching this BPS video on Soros, if you haven’t already.

“This is an Irish report but it’s part of a wider European project which analyses how hate crime is reported and recorded across Europe,” said the council’s executive director, Liam Herrick.

Of course it’s European wide. All European countries need to desperately clamp down on all dissent against their genocidal policies against their native populations. People are starting to wake up to what is going on, and fight back. Their only response is not to listen to our grievances and work with us to resolve things, but to become ever more tyrannical and oppressive. They’re trying to sell this hate crime nonsense as a positive thing to protect vulnerable minorities, but that’s not what it’s about at all. It’s about treating the majorities as second class citizens and punishing us, if we dare to stand up for ourselves.

“What we find in the Irish study is that hate crime, which is not defined in Irish law, is not recorded or reported in a systematic fashion.

Again, I ask this question. “Why should it be?”

We really have an underdeveloped response to what is a serious problem in society.

Minister for Justice, Charlie Flanagan welcomed the report.

Of course he did. Politicians love any excuse to increase the power and reach of the state.

“Hate motivation for crime results in vulnerable groups and individuals being targeted simply for who they are.

So does that mean you’ll be cracking down hard on anyone who has a problem with white people and commits crimes against them, specifically because they’re white?

Yeah don’t bother answering that, because I already know what your answer will be.

That is not acceptable to me or the Government, and I know that it is not acceptable to the Irish people.

You speak for yourself you fucking prick. I’m an Irish person, and you don’t speak for me. I find it perfectly acceptable that we treat victims of crimes equally, rather than giving special treatment to some and not to others.

“This report on hate crime is a hugely important piece of research,

Saying something is important, doesn’t make it important. Also as I mentioned before, this “important” report, is not provided in the article at all. We just have to trust in it, sight unseen.

and makes a series of recommendations on how our criminal justice system can do better in combatting hatred.

Yes a fantastic idea. Instead of combatting actual tangible crimes such as murders, rapes, vicious assaults etc., lets put resources into fighting the universally held emotion of “hatred” instead. What a fantastic idea to focus our attentions on.

“I am making arrangements for this report and its recommendations to be urgently examined by my Department, in consultation with all of the relevant agencies, including of course the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, with the aim of bringing forward proposals to address the findings of the report.”

And I can guarantee that what they will implement on the basis of the report, will be strict laws that give a harsher punishment to those who point out certain politically incorrect truths about the sources of certain crimes, rather than those who do the crimes themselves?

Don’t believe me? Just look at the likes of the UK, Sweden, or Germany, to see what is coming to Ireland, if this happens.

1234567891011

My thoughts on Trump’s “Concentration Camps” for kids.

35731486_2005091909562673_5317842246060474368_n
OMG, isn’t it so sad that this poor Mexican child was put in a cage… that is fake… and by his own parents? Better throw open the border entirely, or else you’re a monster.

There just doesn’t seem to be any escape from the idiotic and infuriating whining and virtue signalling on social media and in the mainstream media, about how much of a bad man Trump is. It’s just completely ridiculous at this point. Every story seems to follow the same path.

  • Trump says or does something.
  • Fake news mainstream media acts as if it as the worst thing ever.
  • Idiots on social media buy into fake news story and pretend to be offended over it.
  • Rational people try to debate with idiots by appealing to reason.
  • Idiots choose to use emotion rather than reason.
  • Idiots demand that we throw out common sense in favour of basing official policy around their own subjective emotions.
  • Truth comes out that debunks fake news narrative.
  • Idiots ignore truth and continue to believe the original lies.
  • Trump says or does something new.
  • Fake news mainstream media acts as if THIS is the worst thing ever and quietly moves on from previous “scandal”.
  • Cycle repeats ad infinitum.

It’s all just so tiring at this point. Look I’m not saying that there aren’t any legitimate reasons to criticise Trump at all. I’ve done so myself in the past, and I will continue to do so, whenever I feel he’s deserving of it. But in regards to the current scandal that the horde of TDS sufferers are outraged over, namely his  alleged “concentration camps” for migrant children, I think he has done nothing wrong at all.

35733499_948277921999527_5684585637995347968_n
This is what people actually believe is happening.

The reality is that Trump’s “concentration camps” are anything but, as the following two videos make quite clear.

Trump’s voters voted for him for many reasons, but the biggest reason of all was because of his pledge to deal with illegal immigration, primarily coming from the southern border. He has a mandate to deal with the issue, and the way I can see it, there are only four possible options.

  1. He can do nothing and effectively give up on having a border at all.
  2. He can build a border wall that stops people from illegally entering in the first place.
  3. He can have agents capture and deport illegal immigrants on the spot.
  4. He can capture and detain immigrants until they’ve had a chance to have their cases heard by a judge. Then deport them afterwards

Option one is the very option he was elected NOT to do. The American people are sick and tired of the consistent failure to defend the borders, and they will not accept this at all.

Option two is the preferred option,  and is the one he was voted in to implement. However, his enemies in congress are doing everything in their power to prevent this from happening.

Option three would be a great temporary measure to implement before building the wall, but he’s prevented from doing this, thanks to the actions of a corrupt judiciary that demands “due process” for every captured illegal immigrant. Despite not being citizens, and not being subject to the same constitutional protections as citizens, there is still an expectation that they waste time and money on court cases, before inevitably deporting them.

This means that the only option left is option four, which is the option that Trump is going with. Illegal immigrants have committed a crime by crossing the border illegally, and like all criminals, they are arrested, sent to jail, and given a chance in court to defend themselves. However, kids can’t go to jail with them, because jail is for adults, which inevitably means that kids and adults have to be separated, with the kids taken into state care instead. This is what all the outrage is over. Kids being taken into state care, while their illegal immigrant parents are in jail for committing a crime. But where is this same outrage when other criminals are arrested and separated from their children? Why is it an issue when illegal immigrants are arrested for the crime of illegal border crossing and separated from their kids, but there is no similar outrage in every other circumstance were a person is arrested and separated from their own children?

It’s just emotional blackmail. There’s no attempt at reason. No attempt at nuance. It’s just complete and utter insanity at this point. They don’t offer any reasonable solution to deal with the flow of illegal immigration. They just lash out at every single attempt to solve it.

“Can I build a border wall?”

“No, we won’t give you the funding.”

“Ok, can I have our agents patrol, capture and deport them straight away?”

“No, you have to give them a chance to defend themselves in court before deporting them.”

“Ok, I’ll do that then.”

“No you can’t do that. Many of them have children, and kids can’t be held in jail while their parents are waiting for their court appearance.”

“Ok that’s fine, we’ll build facilities to care for the children. They’ll have nice beds. They’ll have good food and healthcare. We’ll even provide education and leisure activities for them. They’ll be well looked after, while they’re waiting for their parents.”

“No you can’t do that. You can’t separate children from their parents.”

“Ok, so I can’t build a wall to keep them out. I can’t deport them as soon as they’re caught, because they have to appear in court first. I can’t keep the kids in jail with the parents while the parents are waiting for their court appearance, and I can’t take the kids into state care while the parents are in jail, because I can’t separate them. So what can I do instead?”

“…”

But we know exactly what he can do. The only option they’ll ever accept. Do nothing. Stop enforcing the border. Stop rounding up illegal immigrants entirely. Stop sending people back. Just abolish the border entirely and let everyone in, with no regard for the longterm consequences of doing so.

That’s literally all they will accept. And that’s the one thing he was elected not to do.

Welcome to Airstrip One (YET AGAIN!!!)

The UK government is a totalitarian nightmare, every bit as sinister, as its 1984 counterpart, Airstrip One. For several years, we’ve been hearing stories about Muslim rape gangs, raping little white girls, often with the authorities quite aware of what was happening, but refusing to act.

DeD-PeFX0AA7r91
It will happen in our lifetimes, if sanity isn’t restored.

Today, several of the many number of these child raping scumbags were on trial for their crimes in the Halifax area, and the media has been forced to stay quiet about, lest they “prejudice the trial”. Of course those of us who have any common sense know the real reason for the silence. It is because there is a disproportionately high over-representation of Muslim men (particularly of Pakistani origin), in child sex crimes in Britain, and the treasonous authorities, don’t want the sleeping public to wake up to what is happening.

DeD8b0WXcAAfi1X
The real threat to public safety in Britain isn’t Muslim men raping little girls. It’s white men teaching their dog how to do Nazi salutes as a joke. That’s the real public interest story.

[Oh btw, this sort of thing is also happening in the Netherlands.]

Of course like it or not, the people have a right to know what is going on in the world. Freedom of the press is one of the cornerstones of living in a democracy. Or at least, that’s what we’re led to believe, when the press wants to push narratives that are at odds with our actual interests. When it comes to informing us about things that we actually need to know, suddenly they aren’t so keen to fight for and defend our rights. The only person who was willing to defy the embargo on reporting on what was going on, was “far right” figure, Tommy Robinson.

Here is what happened to him.

He was officially arrested for “breaching the peace”, but all he was actually doing was standing outside the court, and reporting to the public that a trial was going on, and what the trial was about. That’s it. Compare this to the recent trial in Belfast (also in the UK). The media had no restrictions on reporting on the identities of the defendants, what they were accused of, and the evidence presented during the trial. There wasn’t any concern about potentially prejudicing that trial, like there has been with this one. The difference of course, was that the men in the Belfast trial were all white, whereas the men (and 2 women) involved in this Halifax trial are of a Muslim background (I don’t know the races of every one of the defendants, so it’s possible that at least some may be white).

This has nothing to do with maintaining the integrity of the trial. This is purely about the UK government trying to cover up what is being inflicted upon the native British population, by a hostile group that they invited in, and then trying to silence anyone who tells the truth about what is happening. This isn’t done due to them being blinded from reality by political correctness. No, they know exactly what is going on, they know it’s going to keep on happening, and are silencing dissent, because they are at war with their own citizens, and are deliberately trying to harm them. That’s all it is. They aren’t crushing opposition out of a misplaced hope that eventually, things will work out. They’re doing it because they know for a fact that it won’t (because it isn’t intended to work), and they’re terrified of people waking up to the truth, while there is still time to fight back against it.

https_blogs-images.forbes.comtheopriestleyfiles2015071984_3016Pyxurz-e1438359584320
Tommy Robinson on his way to jail.

There’s a very real possibility that if Tommy Robinson goes to prison, that he has effectively been given a death sentence. Seeing as Muslims make up a disproportionately high amount of Britain’s prison population, and Robinson is not very popular with the Muslim community, I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if there are attempts on his life inside.

Does that seem like appropriate punishment for telling a truth that the government doesn’t want people hearing?

Germany getting even more totalitarian.

The Jew is goodness personified. A creature of pure benevolence and generosity. God’s chosen people. An example to us all. However for reasons which remain a mystery, many people (by which I mean, literally every society that has ever dealt with them throughout history), have been infected with the vicious brain disease known as “antisemitism”, which causes them to hate and persecute these pure and innocent victims, for absolutely no reason. Unfortunately in *current year*, this trend hasn’t changed. In the country now commonly known as “Germanistan”, the Nazis are back, but they now go by names such as “Muhammad” rather than the likes of “Adolf”. Maybe the Jewish individuals and organisations pushing so hard for “diversity”, should have considered the longterm consequences of their decisions to flood Europe with these people.

When the Native Germans are gone, and Germany is a Muslim majority country, how do you think that will work out for you and your kind? Not well at all, if present events are a sign of things to come.

Because Germany has a duty to atone for all eternity for certain past events, they need to come up with a solution to the problem of newly arrived Muslim migrants and their (completely irrational and unfounded) hatred of the Jews. Of course, simply closing the borders and sending them back to their own countries (which totally aren’t “shitholes” btw), would be inhumane and evil. So what other solution is there? Well, one bright spark has come up with a unique idea to say the least.

From RT

Authorities should be allowed to take children away from parents who express anti-Semitic views, the head of Germany’s 2nd largest police union has stated, without elaborating on how or when such measures would be enforced.

“We can’t be allowing parents to teach their own values to their own children. The state knows better and should therefore have the right to kidnap these children from their parents and brainwa… er… I mean… ‘educate’ them better on our tolerant German values.”

maxresdefault.jpg

“Authorities need to act decisively [against anti-Semitism] including when the aggression comes from migrants,” Rainer Wendt, head of the German Police Union (DPoIG) told Augsburger Allgemeine newspaper on Wednesday.

If only the authorities were expected to act as decisively against all the migrant violence against the ordinary German citizens. Isn’t it funny how they can be so tolerant towards that, but spring into action, as soon as the Jews start feeling uncomfortable?

berlin-truck-attack
“Sorry, but ‘truck of peace’ attacks are just something you’ll have to get used to. We’re too busy dealing with all the antisemitism instead.”

“If children are raised to become anti-Semites we shouldn’t be afraid to take them away from their families.” He went on to accuse many school administrators of ignoring the problem, saying “they act according to the mantra ‘it doesn’t exist in my school.’”

Will they be taking similar steps in regards to children raised by parents who express racial hatred towards white people? I think we can guess the answer to that.

Untitled.png

“There has also been a tendency not to willingly register anti-Semitism by Muslims – but it needs to be recorded without prejudice so that we can develop effective counter-strategies,” Wendt said.

Yep. I can imagine this has been really tough for the German authorities. On the one hand, they’re getting directions to flood their country with Muslims, to the point were they’re guaranteed to be the dominant demographic eventually, unless there are drastic changes made soon, and to punish anyone who speaks out against it. But then on the other hand, these Muslims despise the Jews, and aren’t afraid to be open about that hatred, and with Germany’s history there, it becomes a case of “How are we supposed to solve this problem?” I have no sympathy btw.

Although Wendt did not specify how exactly he expects it to be determined that parents are anti-Semitic, Josef Schuster, the head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, called last week for a better system to be introduced in schools. He said that teachers and students should have a way to report “anti-Semitic or other acts of violence without bureaucratic hurdles, in order to get a clearer picture of what is going on.”

“MORE NEEDS TO BE DONE!!!”

Wendt’s remarks came just days after Wolfgang Schaeuble, speaker of the Bundestag, said that radical Muslim communities and immigrants with extremist views on Israel are contributing to anti-Semitism in Germany. 

Who could have possibly predicted that this would happen? You know, besides anyone who still has a grasp of basic reality, that is?

11hate_america_crush_israel-vi
This
anti-semitism
Could
death-to-israel-12
Never
mikics_antisemitism_090313_820px70
Have
no_better_blood
Been
overlay
Predicted

It also comes after a Jewish girl in a Berlin primary school was reportedly told by a Muslim classmate that she deserved to be beaten and killed because of her religion, in the third report of anti-Semitism in Berlin schools over the past 12 months. Another Jewish student in Berlin was recently forced to change schools as a result of violent bullying by Muslim classmates, who threatened him with a fake gun.

Wow these things are so much worse than what the women of Cologne, or the people at the 2016 Berlin Christmas Market had to deal with. Finally, we’re hearing about the real problems that are actually worth a proper response.

The police union chief’s remarks come after it was reported that lawmakers from Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats (CDU) and sister party CSU were seeking to adopt measures to deport migrants who express anti-Semitic views in Germany.“Complete acceptance of the Jewish life” is a “criterion for successful integration,” a draft of the proposal said, according to Die Welt.

Any chance of deporting migrants who advocate for terrorism, violence against homosexuals, or who rape native German women and children? Any chance at all? Yeah, I won’t be holding my breath here.

Germany saw an influx of around one million mainly Muslim migrants at the height of the refugee crisis in 2015. Merkel’s open-door policy for those fleeing conflicts and persecution sparked outrage among her critics, who complained about a rise in migrant-related crimes and a strain on the social welfare system.

Yep, and then many of these “critics” ended up getting arrested, simply for expressing their dissatisfaction, with her insane and idiotic decision. You see Germany is not a free country at all. It’s a totalitarian nightmare, not unlike the USSR or North Korea, were a tyrannical state makes decisions that are at odds with the wellbeing of the citizens they supposedly represent. When these citizens speak out against these decisions, something which is generally considered an inalienable right in democratic societies, the state punishes them, ostensibly for engaging in “hate speech”, but really, just for pointing out the truth. It’s an absolute disgrace really.

I think this proposal to take children away from migrant parents who express “anti-Semitic” views, has the potential for abuse. I could easily see it setting a precedent, which could later be used as justification for doing the same thing to native German parents, even the ones who speak out against the migrant invasion. I really don’t see why it couldn’t happen. The German government is desperate to conceal the reality of what is going on, and is willing to do whatever it takes to silence dissenters. Some people may be willing to risk going to prison for speaking truth to authority, but how many would be willing to risk losing their children for it?

 

Nigerian couple in Ireland in massive welfare scam.

We need a lot more immigration to our ancestral homelands of people from the shithole countries of the world.  It is a transformation that MUST take place. Without infinite and uncontrolled immigration from these countries, Europe will not survive. Don’t take my word for it. Instead take the word of one of God’s Chosen People.

If you can’t trust the word of one of God’s Chosen People, then really, who can you trust? Unfortunately a couple of  little things called “evidence” and “reality” have this nasty habit of coming along and contradicting this narrative that we’re presented with. Instead of the evidence suggesting that Europe will not survive without multiculturalism, it actually seems to suggest the exact opposite. That not only would Europe survive just fine, but if anything, would actually do a whole lot better.

From The Journal

A 36-YEAR-old man has been jailed for two years and his wife received a three-year suspended sentence for what has been described as one of the largest welfare fraud cases in the State.

The combined fraud totals more than €400,000 and took place over a period of more than eight years.

Don’t you feel good, Irish men and women. You work hard in a job that makes you miserable. You pay some of the most exorbitant taxes in the world, in proportion to the public services you receive in return. You’re trapped as a debt slave paying off a mortgage, that you won’t clear until you’re in your 60s or 70s… and that’s if you’re lucky enough to even have one.  If you’re in your 30s or younger, you’ll probably never even be able to afford a mortgage at all. Yet while you’re trapped living paycheck to paycheck, with little hope of ever improving your lot in life, there are parasites out there, scamming the money that you had stolen from you. Isn’t that wonderful to hear Irish men and women?

Kenneth Gboboh and his 41-year-old wife Franca arrived in Ireland from Nigeria in 2006.

AND THEY’RE NOT EVEN HOME GROWN PARASITES!!!!

Both applied for and began to receive unemployment benefit.

What is the actual justification for this? How is it possible for someone to just enter the country and immediately start claiming benefits, without ever having paid into the system in the first place? As I’ve tried making clear in the past, the actual reason is that all across the Western world, governments are at war with their white citizenry, and are trying to exterminate us. But rather than rounding us up and killing us, they use a more subtle approach. They deliberately create situations were it’s unaffordable for us to build a life and start families of our own, with the aim of eventually making us go extinct as a race.

Meanwhile, they exploit our productivity, steal the fruits of our labour via taxation, and hand this money over to the peoples that they want to replace us with. This means that while we can’t afford to own a home of our own and to have children of our own, despite working hard to earn a living, we’re subsidising the living standards and reproduction of the people who were brought in to replace us. We’re literally working to support our own ethnic cleansing.

This is the real reason for why this is allowed to happen, but what I’m asking, is have they ever at least given some pretend justification for it? An official explanation for why it’s OK? I won’t believe the official justification, but I would at least like to hear what it is.

Mr Gboboh then established a second identity under the name Patrick Akim and worked as an IT project manager using this name.

“IT Project Manager”

1pa6l2

He also took out a €240,000 mortgage from EBS in 2008 using the name Patrick Akim.

If only native Irish people could get mortgages as easily.

During this time, his wife was continuing to claim jobseeker’s benefit and did not inform the Department of Social Protection that Mr Gboboh was in employment.

A “jobseeker” who wasn’t seeking a job. Why does Europe need to import people like this in order to survive, again?

After he bought the property, at 49 Willow Avenue, Primrose Gate, Celbridge in Co Kildare, Franca Gboboh applied to switch their rent allowance to the newly purchased house.

Her husband filled out a tenancy agreement and signed it as Patrick Akim.

Giving evidence at the sentencing hearing at Naas Circuit Court earlier today, investigating garda Tomás Burke said “the rent allowance granted by Irish State was effectively used to pay that rent under false pretenses”.

1272x920design_01.jpg

Overall, Kenneth Gboboh had fraudulently claimed more than €4,000 in jobseeker’s allowance and fraudulently obtained a mortgage of over €240,000. Franca Gboboh had claimed jobseeker’s allowance of more than €132,000 and rent allowance of almost €49,000. The court also heard that since the State stopped paying rent allowance the couple, who have four children have run up €40,000 in arrears on the mortgage.

They have four children. While you can barely afford to own a couple of cats. You’re being ethnically replaced in your own homeland whitey, and you don’t even know it.

Garda Burke, who told the court he had worked for three years investigating welfare fraud said: “I believe this one, combined with the mortgage application and the welfare fraud is one of the largest, if not the largest investigated to date.”

“”They’ll be working hard and paying the pensions of elderly natives in no time.”

Judge Michael O’Shea was informed by defence counsel of a number of mitigating and personal factors in the case, in particular in the case of Mrs Gboboh.

Oh here we go.

The court heard that investigating gardaí discovered during their questioning that she could neither read nor write, and she claimed her husband had filled out all of the claim forms on her behalf.

“Seeking a job”

“Can’t even read or write”.

Once again let me say it. How does Europe benefit from the presence of people like this? What contributions can they make? If she can’t even read or write, what kind of job was she ever going to do?

Garda Burke told the court that he believed it was Mr Gboboh who was “directing and controlling” the fraud.

“She’s just an innocent victim. We should probably let her go free. Of course, seeing as her husband will be in prison for a few years, and she can’t work, we’re going to have to keep giving her welfare, so she and her four kids don’t suffer. Too bad about all the Irish homeless by the way.”

When asked about the stress the woman had been under over this period, he replied: “She had to essentially commit fraud every week, so I can imagine it was stressful.”

Not as stressful as things are for the native Irish people who are trying to keep a roof over the heads, while being taxed into oblivion, in order to subsidise worthless parasites like this.

2914
“But…but…but… look at the tears. She’s crying. Don’t you feel sorry for her? She was under stress.”

A psychological assessment found the 41-year-old woman had a difficult upbringing in Nigeria and ranked in the bottom one percentile intellectually. The court was also told that the couple’s youngest child has autism.

Wow. The average IQ in Nigeria is 84. And she’s in the bottom 1%, so her’s is significantly lower still.

BUT EUROPE WILL NOT SURVIVE WITHOUT PEOPLE LIKE THIS!!!!

Justice O’Shea handed down a three-year sentence to Kenneth Gboboh, with the last 12 months suspended. In sentencing his wife, he acknowledged that she had been “under the control and influence of her husband”.

He’ll be out in half that time, and she doesn’t get punished at all. Irish justice for you folks.

dredd1_2_28_28_26
We need real judges in this country.

And while he said children should not be “used as a shield”, he asked: “Can the children lose two parents in one day?”

Yes.

He sentenced her to three years for each of the 14 counts of fraud to run concurrently and suspended all three years.

Pathetic. No lesson will be learned.

Welcome to Airstrip One (Again).

The country now commonly known as the “United Caliphate”, AKA “Britcuckistan”, AKA “Cuck Island“, and formerly known as the “United Kingdom”, is one of the few countries out there that has shown itself to be a viable contender to Sweden, for the crown of “First Western country to commit national suicide”. It’s stories like today’s that reveal exactly why it’s such a strong contender for the title.

From Times of Israel

A Scottish man who taught his girlfriend’s dog to do the Nazi salute was found guilty of a hate crime.

Spare a thought for the precious 6 million, gassed to death in a homicidal fake shower room, by a vicious, Nazi Pug.

820915

Mark Meechan, 29, was convicted on Tuesday in Airdrie Sheriff’s Court in Scotland and is out on bail until his sentencing next month, the London-based Jewish Chronicle reported.

It’s quite likely, he’ll actually go to prison for this. Literally just for posting this video.

An obvious joke video. This is a hate crime now apparently.

He taught the pug, named Buddha, to respond with the Nazi salute when prompted by statements such as “Heil Hitler” and “gas the Jews.” Meechan posted videos of the dog performing the trick on YouTube.

2810246.main_image

How could anyone have a problem with this? It’s hilarious, and absolutely adorable.

The original video, posted in September 2016 on his YouTube channel, Count Dankula, was viewed more than 2.8 million times before it was removed for violating YouTube’s policy on hate speech. Meechan said on the video that he trained the dog to annoy his girlfriend.

“My girlfriend is always ranting and raving about how cute and adorable her wee dog is, so I thought I would turn him into the least cute thing I could think of, which is a Nazi,” he said.

See? He isn’t even endorsing Nazism. He outright says that he wanted to turn the dog into the least cute thing that he could think of, in order to prank his girlfriend. The worst possible thing he could think of was a Nazi. That means that he thinks Nazis are a bad thing, and therefore is not a sign of support for their views.

2810246.main_image
Although once again, I have to say that I disagree with his idea that this isn’t “cute”.  Look at the little guy trying to do a Roman Salute.

Meechan later posted a video in which he apologized for the original dog clips, saying it was a joke and that he has no such political leanings.

“I am so sorry to the Jewish community for any offense I have caused them. This was never my intention and I apologize,” he said.

Once again proving the old adage true, which is that when you get attacked for “being offensive”, you should never apologise. They never accept the apology. They just see it as a sign of weakness and it causes them to attack even harder. The man apologised for his obvious joke video, and he still got convicted for committing a hate crime. What good did his apology do?

Sheriff Derek O’Carroll said Tuesday that Meechan “knew that the material was offensive and knew why it was offensive. He would have known it was grossly offensive to many Jewish people.”

O’Carroll said he took freedom of expression into consideration, “but the right to freedom of expression also comes with responsibility.”

So what if it is offensive? It’s called “taking offense” for a reason. Because it’s something that you take, rather than something that is given to you. If they find it offensive, that’s their problem. Have we really gotten to the stage were we’re putting people in prison, for offending others? Have we really sunk that low?

hqdefault
Should the person who did this, also be put in prison, seeing as this would be highly offensive to Christians?

This story is bad enough on its own, but it feels even worse, when you put it in a wider context. It wasn’t long ago that yet another massive case of Muslim men torturing and raping little white English girls en masse, came out. Apparently this had been going on in the city of Telford for almost 40 years. For almost 40 years, a hostile alien force has been destroying the lives of innocent native girls, and the authorities were doing nothing to put an end to it. Yet a guy makes an obvious joke video online, gets arrested immediately, and convicted of a hate crime, just because the video is “offensive”.

voltaire-fake-quote

Isn’t it funny how quick the police can act when a man who is a member of a “privileged” group, offends an “oppressed” group (Jews), but when another “oppressed” group (Muslims) commits the most vicious and brutal crimes against a “privileged” group (white children), the police do nothing about it for about 40 years? Isn’t that something? Does that not prove, just how real “white privilege” really is?

Britain is in an awful state right now, and is very much in the running to beat Sweden in the race to the bottom.

Child rapist is “trans-aged” apparently.

ct-1516894667-g14kqev2mw-snap-image
Look at this poor child. would you believe, that they’re actually trying this 9 year old boy as an adult, just because he engaged in sexual activities with his fellow children? What is the world coming to?

We live in rapidly dying societies. We’ve lost all reason and all sense of reality. We care more about not offending vocal minorities, than we do about protecting the needs of the majority. We give an inch, and a mile… no, not a mile, but rather a light-year is taken in return. When we show ourselves to be willing to compromise on something as basic as objective reality, it stands to reason that there will always be unscrupulous people out there who will be there to prey upon our moral cowardice, if it’s advantageous for them to do so.

From MRC TV

A child rapist on trial for sexually assaulting three little girls is now claiming he’s a “trans-aged” little boy trapped in a man’s body. 

Remember though. The slippery slope is just a fallacy invented by bigots to justify their bigotry.

slippery_slope
This is what they actually think we believe when we talk about slippery slopes.

According to the Chicago Tribune, 38-year-old Joseph Roman has been accused of violating three girls between the ages of 6 and 8. Now, Roman’s defending himself by claiming he’s a 9-year-old stuck in a grown man’s body.

“A Chicago man accused of sexually assaulting three young girls told prosecutors he considered himself a boy in a man’s body, according to Cook County court documents.

Joseph Roman, 38, is charged with predatory criminal sexual assault stemming from repeated attacks on three girls who were 6 to 8 years old at the time, according to prosecutors. Roman was a friend of the girls’ families at the time of the attacks between 2015 and January of this year.” 

He needs to be fucking executed. Nothing less will suffice for a piece of shit like this.

046a1299a9cfb1ab0013fd44ca1ff7f65b5d32d1_hq
I think this method will suffice nicely.

Roman’s victims included a 6-year-old girl whose family stayed briefly in his home, and an 8-year-old girl who sometimes stayed with him while her mother worked a late-night shift at her job.  

But this innocent 9 year old boy who is too young to have possibly gone through adolescence, was somehow driven to sexually violate them. It’s not his fault though, as he is clearly too young to comprehend the gravity of his actions. Plus, he’s below the age of consent himself as well, so technically speaking, those three girls are just as guilty of raping him, as he is of raping them. I guess we just gotta let them all go free, or punish them all equally. It’s the only fair solution.

Of course, those of us with more than four brain cells between our ears knew it was only a matter of time before someone offered up the “trans-age” excuse in defense of assaulting children.

Yep.

In fact, most of us knew the day was coming back when this 52-year-old guy first started claiming he was a 6-year-old girl stuck in an adult male’s body.

Yes, I remember that case well.

If you don’t think that THIS is a 6 year old girl, you’re an evil monster.

Then again, we also knew the left’s whole “open-minds, open-bathrooms” policy would likely lead to women being creeped on and attacked by men in public restrooms and changing spaces – which it didhere and here and also here. 

Yeah, but that’s a small price to pay for not potentially hurting the feeling of a demographics that makes up around 0.3% of the population.

But if men who think they’re women deserve to be treated as such simply because they say so, then whose to say this fully grown guy in Chicago shouldn’t be treated as a little boy stuck in a grown man’s body?

And that’s exactly the point I bring up with regards to the slippery slope, because it is a valid comparison. If we’re going to force people to throw out everything they know and understand about objective reality in one scenario, then what’s to say that we won’t force them to do the exact same thing in other scenarios as well? Why is it OK to demand that people refer to other people with all the physical and genetic characteristics of males, as females, if that is their preference, but we don’t expect similar things to happen in regards to race, species, and in this case, age?

Screen-Shot-2017-02-23-at-3.53.42-PM.png
“She’s clearly a cat, you hate filled bigot. How is that in *current year*, there are still uneducated fools like you who don’t understand this?”

One need look no further to see why the left’s “trans” logic is a house of cards that has no hope of standing.

When I look at a case like this, I can’t help but wonder. Is this the sort of thing that people will soon be defending in just a few short years? I know that might sound completely paranoid, but just look at how much things have “progressed” already in the past few years. Is it really hard to believe that something like this might be promoted as normal very soon?