Satire is dead in Sweden.

“It’s not Islamic terrorism, you racist, Islamophobic, bigot. It’s ‘Vehicular terrorism’. Don’t you know, those trucks drove themselves?”

I remember when the first notable example of a Muslim terrorist using a vehicle to kill people occurred in Nice, social media was rife with sarcastic comments about the need to “Ban all trucks” or to introduce “truck control laws”, playing off the comments about gun control, that inevitably follow every single shooting death that occurs in America. The whole point of the comments was to sound absurd as possible, to mock the fact that the media and political establishment will jump through hoops to try to avoid talking about the real issues that lead to these frequent tragedies. The reality is that you can ban guns all you want. It might make things a little more inconvenient for a determined killer, but as the wave of vehicle related terrorist attacks in Europe has shown, they will find other ways. Nobody was ever seriously suggesting that vehicles needed to be banned.

But then Sweden had a terrorist attack, in which a vehicle was the murder weapon of choice…

From Aftonbladet (Translated by Google)

Cars have turned into deadly weapons. They have been easy to steal and then nothing has been able to stop their advance.

Yep. As I’ve always maintained, I’m no gun nut myself, but I’ve always believed that those who obsess over the “gun control” issue, are completely misguided. People erroneously presume that America has a huge amount of gun violence, solely because of the easy access to guns. But if easy access to guns was the case, then why doesn’t Switzerland have a similar amount of gun violence, and why is it that in America, it has only really become a problem in recent decades? Well, the answer can be found by reading “The Color of Crime”. High gun proliferation isn’t the issue. Diversity is, and as Europe becomes more “diverse”, just as America did a few decades before us, we too are seeing an increase in violent crime. If it isn’t guns, it’s trucks. If it isn’t trucks, it will be something else.

In Nice, Berlin, Jerusalem, London and Stockholm they have been used as effective murder machines terrorists who wanted to kill many people.

Yeah, and who were the responsible parties in each of those situations? It sure wasn’t indigenous, white Europeans, that’s for sure.

Sure, it was Muslims every single time so far, but this is just an unfortunate coincidence. It really could have been anyone.

If people in the future will be protected cars must simply removed from the collection sites and city centers. It is not reasonable for a big truck can be driven right into Stockholm’s popular walking street on a Friday afternoon just before Easter. Politicians have been good at protecting themselves, but now they must also ensure citizens’ needs for secure environments.

And there you have it. The solution to the recent spate of terrorist attacks involving vehicles? Ban vehicles from city centers. Normal citizens have to have their own rights curtailed, in order to protect them from the invading force that their treacherous elites forced upon, against their will. This is the price we have to pay for the diversity we never even asked for.

Never forget those who were responsible for this. We didn’t ask for multiculturalism. We weren’t consulted about it. We had it inflicted upon us because of some bullshit about how we wouldn’t survive without out (no explanation as to why we wouldn’t survive). Personally, I think we could have survived just fine.

It has been fourteen years ago, a man drove right onto Western Street in Old Town . He killed a woman and injured another 18 people. There were several reasons to protect the medieval city center, but security in the narrow alleys should have been a strong argument. It is indeed remarkable that car traffic soon-still must scroll through the Old Town.

Stockholm is an international city, a tourist city with 13.5 million overnight stays last year. Of the four persons killed at Queen Street were three visitors, one woman from Belgium, a woman from Uddevalla, and a British man.

Don’t forget the fifth victim. The poor, innocent dog.


I honestly feel more sympathy for the poor dog than the people at this point. The people are the ones supporting this insanity, by living in denial about what is actually happening. The dog on the other hand can’t be blamed.

Shopping Street is a popular destination for our visitors and should of course be a safe environment. Many tourists continue down the street to the Old Town, but quite surely it is just around the headquarters and Parliament House. There are stops for unwanted cars that can also be folded down for any significant transport must be developed. The technology there is, but it’s not for everyone.

Sadly, the terrorist didn’t strike the parliament house instead of random passers-by. It wouldn’t be as much of a tragedy if he had.

These people are a disgrace.

Most things can be solved for taxi and transportation service. Deliveries to shops and restaurants can also be redirected to the times when fewer people are out walking the streets.

Stockholm’s traffic has always been about flows. Motorists should drive in a steady stream, and nothing will stop them. Now being built also fast cycle paths so that cyclists can flow through the city.

All sounds very complicated and unnecessary. I could suggest a simpler solution. Stop immigration from incompatible people, and deport the incompatible ones who are already there.

More rarely, there is talk of the need for a peaceful environment. If parks and squares friendly welcoming our visitors and where children can move without danger to their lives.

Their lives wouldn’t be in danger anyway if you put a stop to this insane immigration system.

Justice Minister Morgan Johansson believes that it is difficult to protect people in an open society. But motorists may run anywhere is surely not transparent. The cars have dominated our cities for decades, now it is the people who need space. Now it is cars that must be regulated.

“Cars must be regulated”

This is coming from the country that gave us this.


I don’t think I can really add anything more at this point. The sheer stupidity should be obvious to anyone… except this woman.

Expecting basic literacy skills from teachers is “racist”.

I’m a firm believer that “equality of opportunity” is a good code of conduct to live by. I don’t see any reason why a person should be denied a fair opportunity for something, on account of their membership of a certain race, gender, sexual orientation etc., if none of these things are a relevant factor.

However, a lot of people seem to confuse “equality of opportunity” with “equality of outcome” and therefore assume that if we aren’t seeing equality of outcome in certain places, that this must be down to discrimination. The problem is, that while we might be all “equal” in terms of our rights and protections under the law, that doesn’t mean that we’re equal in every way. And that’s just it, we aren’t all equal. We all have different strengths and weaknesses, and some people just aren’t as capable in certain endeavours as others. Some people are simply capable of reaching higher standards than others and it’s impossible to have equality while maintaining these high standards. The only way equality can be achieved is by dragging the standards down to the level of the weakest candidates which of course by definition means a lower quality of standards.

I’ve actually touched on this sort of thing before in a post I wrote nearly two years ago. The post in question dealt with a story about how the United Stated Marine Corps was lowering their fitness standards so that women could qualify (under the existing standards at the time, not one woman had ever passed). The logic given for this was that the test was “sexist”, and “outdated”, and that standards needed to be changed, so that women could pass. The standards that existed had nothing to do with sexism though. They were just the standards that it was felt Marines needed to meet in order to actually do their job properly. Men just had a natural advantage because due to biology, they’re physically stronger than women on average. If a man couldn’t meet the existing standards, he wouldn’t pass either. The obvious endgame of this decision to change the standards, is that in a potential future conflict, there will be marines on the battlefield who are less capable, and therefore, more likely to either die, or cause the deaths of their colleagues. That doesn’t seem to matter though. Not hurting the feelings of unqualified applicants is more important than keeping people alive apparently.

Today’s story deals with teachers, rather than military personnel. I don’t think we can expect any potential deaths because of this decision, but we could see plenty of students having their future earning potential and livelihoods hindered, because of having been taught by inferior teachers. I’m of the believe that the student’s needs are more important than the feelings of unqualified teachers. New York State doesn’t seem to share my views on the topic.

From Daily Caller

Prospective teachers in New York will likely no longer have to pass a basic reading and writing literacy exam, the Associated Press is reporting.

Who needs teachers who are capable of reading and writing? I’m sure they’ll do an excellent job teaching students how to read and write… without knowing how to do those things themselves.

The state’s Board of Regents is expected to ditch the Academic Literacy Skills Test in part because black and Hispanic teaching candidates struggled to pass the exam, according to the AP.


“Aw sheeeit. We wuz kangz yo. We don’ need no muh’fuggin crackah tests to be able to get dat learn on with those kidz n shit.”

“A+. Congratulations, you’re now a qualified teacher Tyrone. Your student’s future depends on how well you teach them.”

So because black and Hispanic candidates struggle to pass the test, it must be racist somehow. I don’t really understand how this could be exactly. I don’t think we’ll be getting an explanation as to how either. Just that it “must be racist because they aren’t passing”.

Also I would like to once again point out, that if America is such a racist, white supremacist, white privileged society, then why is it that on average, Indians, East Asians, and Jews, are more successful than white people? Why do the racist white people cause blacks and Hispanics to fail, but they don’t do the same for the other groups? It’s just such a mystery. Well, it is if you choose to be willfully ignorant, make certain possible explanations taboo, and therefore limit the possibilities as to what the answer could be.


It’s not even white supremacy. East Asians are the ones who come out on top.

Just 41 percent of black teaching candidates and 46 percent of Hispanics passed the test on their first try, compared to 64 percent of white candidates.

So a large percentage of white people fail the test as well then? And a fairly large percentage of black and Hispanic do actually pass, but just not as large a percentage as white people. Sounds like it’s just a tough test that passes the qualified applicants, and fails the unqualified, regardless of their race. What could be fairer than that?

The multiple choice exam is meant to ensure high standards among prospective teachers, which many teaching preparation programs have struggled to do.

A December 2016 study by the National Council on Teacher Quality found that 44 percent of teaching programs “cannot ensure that most of their incoming candidates are among the top half of college students.”

Maybe the teaching programs scrapped their own set of standards for prospective course coordinators, and now there are inferior people teaching prospective teachers.

Hey, anything is possible.

A state task force recommended the board scrap the exam because of the number of black and hispanic candidates struggling to pass it. The board is expected to adopt the recommendations on Monday.

Lets not maintain high standards. Lets allow our standards to be dictated by the level of the weakest candidates.

There are too many black NBA players. This must be because of racism. This white man’s skill levels should be the standard for playing in the NBA so we can achieve equality.

“We want high standards, without a doubt.


Not every given test is going to get us there,” Pace University professor Leslie Soodak told the AP.

“So lets just scrap the tests entirely then.”

Soodak was a member of the task force that advocated abandoning literacy tests for teachers.

“Having a white workforce really doesn’t match our student body anymore,” Soodak added.

But…but…I thought we were all equal, and race doesn’t matter. Surely we should judge people not “by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” That would be the proper thing to do, right?


This meme sure gets a lot of mileage.

Opponents to the exam unsuccessfully attempted to have it struck down in court in 2015, arguing that it was discriminatory because racial minorities performed worse on the test than white candidates.

No explanation as to how exactly a multiple choice questionnaire could be discriminatory. Like I said, there are other possibilities to take into consideration that could more easily explain why these minorities are performing worse on average.

Just posting this again, to let it sink in. Keep in mind that there are parts where there is overlap both in the high and low parts. This would explain the minorities who do pass, and the whites who fail. Outliers always exist, but the mean, median, and mode are what will define the pattern.

A federal judge declined to strike it down, however.

Nice to see there are still some good judges. Of course, that never stops these people. They’re like religious zealots. If they have a goal, they’ll keep pushing and pushing for it, until they eventually get their way. Ultimately, they can lose a hundred times in a row, and it doesn’t matter, because they’ll just try again until they finally win once.

And they only need to win once.

Somali in Sweden gets probation for impregnating a 14 year old girl.

“No President Trump. We have no idea what you’re talking about. Everything is fine here in Sweden. Please stop saying there’s a problem here in case you draw global attention to uncomfortable truths about us…um…I mean… in case you cause a spike in anti-migrant hate crimes. Yes, that will do.”

From Fria Tider (Translated by Google)

DOMESTIC. A criminal Somalis gets away with probation for child sexual abuse, molestation and violent resistance in Borlänge. The 14-year-old girl who suffered sexual became pregnant and has given birth to somalierns children.

I honestly cannot understand that country at all. They claim to have “feminism” as a core ideology of how they govern things, yet they continue to import the absolute dregs of the world into their country by the millions, give them free reign to rape and sexually assault their women and girls non-stop, then give them a slap on the wrist for doing so, every single time. Seriously, in regards to their pathetic sentencing policies, I’ve written about similar cases in the past.

The 19-year-old Mohammed, who previously was 21 years “on paper”, had the judgment intercourse with only 14-year-old girl at least 10 occasions between December 2015 and August 2016, which led to the girl became pregnant. In October last year the child was born.

Strange how the name “Mohammed” seems to show up so often in cases about crimes being committed in Europe these days. Must just be a strange coincidence, as there couldn’t possibly be any other explanation. Any other explanation would be “racist” or “Islamophobic”, and that matters more than “truth”.

The girl was on the run from a treatment center and in a vulnerable situation when she ended up in Mohammed’s grip.

Now Mohammed is sentenced Falu District Court for the sexual exploitation of children. Although the girl reported that she was before she was sexually abused repeatedly told Somali she was 14, believes the court, among other things, due to Mohammed proved to have noticeably “hard to understand some not too complicated” things. Because of his low cognitive ability, it is not proved that he knew her age.

That sets a very dangerous precedent right here. They’re allowing him to essentially get away with his crime because he’s a fucking idiot who is too stupid to understand what he did. The problem here though is that a Somali being an idiot is nothing exceptional. Just as I mentioned in my last post, the average IQ in Somalia is 68.


In the old, non-politically correct IQ scale, that puts them in the higher end of the “Moron” category.


So in other words, he’s getting away with his crime just because he happens to have the average level of Somali cognitive abilities. Yet Sweden is importing Somalis by the hundreds of thousands to live among them, so if this precedent exists then in theory, it means they’re all now above the law. This is an absolutely insane idea. They clearly aren’t capable of living in a civilised society and therefore, they shouldn’t be allowed in.

Somali was also convicted of molestation and violent resistance against two guards and tavern for spitting a female police officer in the eye – which meant that she had to go on the tests to rule out that she was infected with a serious disease, writes Dala-Democrat .

“He’ll be working hard and contributing taxes to pay the pensions of old Swedes in no time. We’re so lucky to have people like him here to ‘enrich’ our culture.”

The 19-year-old Somali has previously been convicted of a very large number of crimes, including robberies on two occasions and abuse. But Falu District Court judges that “the situation of Mohammed” now has “improved” since he lives in the family home and participate in programs to combat abuse.

“The district court’s judgment is that a prison sentence could impair the positive developments taking place in the current situation,” writes Falu District Court and judge Mohammed to probation.

“He’s a good boy. He ‘dindu nuffin’. He’s getting his life back on track. Need more money fo’ dem programs”.

Just when I read those two paragraphs, it reminds me a lot of this comic for some reason, which deals with America’s “race problem” and the media manipulation surrounding it. It just goes to show that the narrative we’re fed is the same in every country. Whenever racial minorities commit crimes against white majorities, they can’t ever be blamed for their own actions, and always deserve a second (or third, or forth, or fifth, etc.) chance.


Mohammed, who came to Sweden in 2007 along with his family, also avoid deportation back to Somalia.

10 years there, still hasn’t managed to integrate or approximate the proper behaviour of a civilised human being. And years from now when Sweden resembles another Somalia, nobody will be able to figure out just “what went wrong”.

Finland encouraging children to rat out their parents for thought crimes.


Whenever there is a brutal, tyrannical, regime in power, it isn’t unusual for those living under it, to try to resist or speak out against its oppression of them. However, for obvious reasons, this is often done in secrecy, for fear of the consequences that can result in doing so openly. Arguably the most oppressive regime that has ever existed, was the Soviet Union during the Stalin era. Like any other oppressive regime, there were many people living under it, who resented it, and tried to fight back in their own way, even if it was just something as simple as keeping more than their allocated share of grain from the farms they worked on, rather than handing it all over to Soviet authorities, and only being handed a small amount back, barely enough to survive on.

If people like this, just trying to survive the Holodomor, had the audacity to try and hold onto some grain that they grew themselves, they were committing a crime.

The Soviet authorities needed to find ways to catch people who were resisting their oppression, and one of the main methods they used, was the use of informants to rat others out. The most despicable thing of all that they did to recruit potential informants, was to brainwash children into spying upon and ratting out their own parents, for committing crimes against the state. The parent would then most likely end up doing slave labour in a gulag in Siberia, or murdered, all because their own child was encouraged to sell them out.

It seems that the modern west is taking lessons from that disgraceful era. In Finland, there is currently a campaign underway to encourage children to inform on their parents, if they post politically incorrect things on the internet. Lets just take a look.

It all just comes off as so cute and innocent. The mother posts a “naughty thing” on Social Media to some politician that she has a problem with, her daughter thinks this is unacceptable, and reports her to her lion teddy, who then turns into some guy in a lion mascot costume. The guy in the lion costume wags his finger at the mother for being such a naughty woman, while her daughter lectures her, and the woman seems to have learned her lesson. Then there is a weird song and dance number about how posting certain nasty comments online (no specific guidelines on what counts exactly) may be a criminal offence, and that you can be punished for it. It’s all portrayed as a simple public service announcement, aiming to inform people to be careful that they don’t accidentally commit a crime by saying the wrong thing.

It isn’t so cute and innocent at all. In the last couple of years, we’ve gradually started seeing changes in the way the European masses think. We’ve been experiencing one disaster after another, as a result of the genocidal mass immigration policies that our political establishment has inflicted upon us. None of us were ever given a vote on whether or not we even wanted to become multicultural societies. We had the decision forced upon us against our wills, and if the popularity of Donald Trump’s anti-immigration comments in America are anything to go by, I believe that if we were given a vote on the matter, and both sides were given an equal platform to make their cases, that all over Europe, we would reject it if given the option to do so.

However, the political establishment are not going to give up on their plans so easily and seeing as they can’t possibly win the debate on the merit of their arguments (lets face it, what are the alleged benefits of multiculturalism, and do these alleged benefits outweigh the consequences that we’ve seen unfold?), they have to use more and more oppressive tactics to silence dissent, and now clearly they’re aiming to follow the example that Soviet Union set 80 years ago, by using impressionable children as informants against their own parents who speak out against their plans. That is how evil and sick these people are, and yet they will project and claim that we’re the evil ones for speaking out against our own ongoing genocide.

There’s a Hitler quote that seems appropriate for what they are attempting to do.


We can’t allow them them to brainwash children like this. You can be sure that it won’t just be Finland trying this soon enough. The rest of Europe will inevitably follow. If they do manage to own the youth, they will gain the future, and from the looks of things, it will be a very grim future indeed.

“The Koran says it’s OK”

This is a story that is reminiscent of the time Sweden banned a gay right’s parade through a Muslim majority area, because it “might offend the Muslims”. A Dutch watchdog has made a decision that it’s perfectly OK for Muslims to call for the violent and brutal murder of gay people, because they have freedom of religion and that is their religious belief. It’s completely mind blowing to me that they’re still trying to pretend this multicultural experiment has been anything less than a complete disaster for the indigenous populations, because only the most clueless of people out there must still be buying into the lies.

From Express

FURIOUS Dutch MPs have demanded an immediate public inquiry after a government-backed watchdog said it was acceptable for Muslims to send gay people death threats.

Honestly, it’s a really bad sign that it has gotten to the point were things like this don’t shock me anymore. It’s so completely obvious at this point that all of our governments in the Western world are actively attempting to commit genocide against us and have us replaced by Muslims, that I’m really not surprised that they allow this. They’ll go on about how much they care about gay rights, but if the choice is between protecting the lives of homosexuals and appeasing Muslims, they’ll support the Muslims every time, no matter what.

In a shocking move, the taxpayer-funded hotline said it would not pursue a criminal complaint over horrific messages from radical Islamists because the Koran says gay people can be killed.

Oh well that’s fair enough then. Because a book written 1400 years ago by a desert warlord, whose followers have been trying to conquer and enslave us ever since, says it’s OK for gay people to be killed, I guess that means it’s OK for gay people to be killed.

Coming soon to The Netherlands.

The disgraceful stance came to light when a member of the public complained about death threats posted to an online forum which called for homosexuals to be “burned, decapitated and slaughtered”. 

Wow, what a hate filled Islamophobe, that person must be. How could anyone possibly take offence to comments like that, when it has already been established, that the Koran says this is OK?

Dutch MPs today reacted with horror to the revelations, demanding an immediate inquiry into the remarks and calling for the hotline to be stripped of public funding. 

According to Dutch media advisors from the anti-discrimination bureau MiND said that, while homophobic abuse was usually a crime, it was justifiable if you were Muslim due to laws on freedom of religious expression. 

Does that mean extremist Christians who also oppose homosexuality will be free to call for the death of gay people because of their “religious freedom”?

Yeah… we already know the answer to that question.

They argued that the Koran says it is acceptable to kill people for being homosexual, and so death threats towards gay people from Muslims could not be discriminatory. 

In a jaw-dropping email explaining why they could not take up the complaint, they wrote: “The remarks must be seen in the context of religious beliefs in Islam, which juridically takes away the insulting character.”

I know I said before that nothing surprises me anymore, but that doesn’t mean that I’m able to actually understand this. I really can’t comprehend the mental gymnastics that has to be done to think this way and to believe that it makes sense.

 They concluded that the remarks were made in “the context of a public debate about how to interpret the Quran” and added that “some Muslims understand from the Quran that gays should be killed”.


And they went on: “In the context of religious expression that exists in the Netherlands there is a large degree of freedom of expression. In addition, the expressions are used in the context of the public debate (how to interpret the Koran), which also removes the offending character.”

The death threats had been made in the comments section for an article about a Dutch-Moroccan gay society, which had been posted to an online platform for Holland’s large Moroccan community. 

The revelation that they were so easily brushed aside by the anti-discrimination hotline will fuel an intense debate in the Netherlands over freedom of expression. 

Personally, I’m very much in favour of freedom of speech. I think unless a direct threat is made (ie., at a specific person, or laying out a specific plan to make an attack), people shouldn’t be arrested for saying offensive things. However, if they have laws like this in place anyway, then everybody should be equal under them. It isn’t right that a Muslim person can make a statement that “gay people should all be killed”, but if a non-Muslim, Dutch person said the same thing, they would be arrested for it. Fair’s fair.

Far-right politician Geert Wilders, whose party is expected to win next spring’s general election, is currently on trial for inciting racial hatred after telling a rally there were “too many Moroccans” in the Netherlands. 

Muslim says gay people should be killed. Perfectly acceptable.

Dutch politician says there too many members of an alien group in the country. Hate speech.

Does this make any sense?

And two right-wing MPs, Joram van Klaveren and Louis Bontes, have now announced their intention to bring up the incident in the Dutch parliament by asking questions of the Justice Minister. 

Good. Put him on the spot and force him to try to defend this insanity, thus exposing himself as a traitor.

The pair argued that public prosecutors must be permitted to take up cases of homophobic abuse, especially where it concerns threats of violence, no matter who is making the discriminatory remarks. 

As I said, fair’s fair. Why should Muslims be immune from certain laws?

Mr Van Klaveren will ask: “Do you share our disgust at the fact that this explicitly states that inciting violence is not a problem if it comes from the Islamic belief?”

A spokesman for the MiND hotline admitted that after “further research” of the issue it had concluded that the complaint had been “unjustly assessed”. 

Translation: “We didn’t expect anybody to call us out on this, but now that they are, we have to make it look as if it was just a silly mistake, rather than a deliberate decision”.

He added that when the complaint involved calling for violence against a particular group, the beliefs of the person making the threats should not matter.

No, they really shouldn’t.

“My religion is Nazism. In our religious text ‘Mein Kampf’, it says that Jews should be killed. You must respect my religious freedom, and can’t therefore prosecute me for ‘discrimination’.

Douchebag celebrity George Takei cries about Trump yet again.

Between Brexit, the Migrant Crisis, and the Trump phenomenon, one of the most annoying things to see as of late, has been the huge amount of celebrities, coming down from their ivory towers to lecture all of us dumb little people about how terrible we are for having the audacity to have sociopolitical opinions that they personally disagree with.

For example, remember when that unhygienic walking bio-hazard, Bob Geldof, took time out of his busy schedule of avoiding the shower, to instead give the finger to a bunch of poor English fisherman for supporting the leave option in the Brexit Referendum?

It’s amazing how a man can do so much good for charity, and still be a massive, unlikeable dickhead of the highest order.

How about George Clooney, constantly virtue signalling about how more needs to be done, to help those millions of young, military aged, African men, who are coming from various Sub-Saharan African countries to Europe, allegedly to escape the brutal Syrian civil war? Well, when a migrant camp is set up close to his Italian mansion, we don’t hear a peep out of him volunteering to open his own door to them. You see, it’s only us little people who have to actually do more to help, and it’s only us little people who have to suffer the consequences of making such stupid decisions. Big time celebrities like George Clooney just have to appear in public and talk down to rest of us, without actually paying the price.

Not only was he the worst Batman ever, who killed the Batman film series for 8 years, but he’s just an obnoxious prick in general.

One of the vocal celebrities discussing political matters as of late, has been former Star Trek actor George Takei, a guy who once used his social media presence to just post funny memes, but has in the past year or so, used it to lash out at Trump non-stop. Now look, I’m not saying he has no right to express his opinion on the new President-Elect. Nobody, including Trump, is above criticism or scrutiny. As much as I joke around with the whole “Glorious Leader” shtick, I am in actuality well aware of the fact that Trump is far from perfect and indeed, has character flaws of his own. I’ve just always felt that the alternatives to Trump were a whole lot worse, as well as genuinely agreeing with him on many issues. However, the kind of hysteria being directed against him at times is just ridiculous and quite frankly, stupid. So stupid in fact, that it’s no surprise that the Huffington Post of all publications, has decided to give it a platform.

An example of the typical journalistic standards on the Huffington Post.
And again.
In fact, they have memes like this to mock how their narrative changes depending on their needs at the time.

Anyway, so lets take a look at what Takei had to say.


From Huffington Post

“Star Trek” veteran George Takei blasted a Donald Trump surrogate’s contention that the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II set a precedent for a national Muslim registry.

They interned Japanese-Americans during World War 2, because they were at war with Japan at the time, and they feared the possibility of spies and saboteurs, loyal to their homeland, working against their war effort from the inside. They did the same thing to German-Americans and Italian-Americans too, because they were also at war with these countries at the same time. You can debate the morality behind this action if you wish, but it wasn’t done just for the sake of it. They were genuinely concerned about a possible threat to national security and to the country’s survival, and did what they thought was in their best interests at the time.

If anything, I think this just reinforces the point that multiculturalism is a ridiculous, flawed idea. If having a multicultural society results in such a scenario were people of differing cultural backgrounds, living within the same borders, under the same government, mistrust each other that much, that a single crises causes one group to round up and intern others, out of the fear that they could be enemy collaborators, then how could it possibly be considered a good thing? As the old saying goes, “United we stand, divided we fall”. That’s why I believe that diversity is not a strength. Unity is, and there are plenty of scientific studies that back this up.

The idea of a database that tracks Muslims, promoted by Trump early on the campaign trail, was seconded by Carl Higbie Wednesday. In an interview with Fox News’ Megyn Kelly, Higby, who served as spokesman for a pro-Trump super PAC, said the proposal would “pass Constitutional muster.”

“There is precedent for it,” he said.

Yep, I mentioned it 9 months ago in my post about “Why I support Trump”. It’s a perfectly legal action to take. The only dilemma is the ethical concerns surrounding it. However, what is worse? Without allowing your own population a vote on the matter, importing millions of followers of an ideology, which for the past 1400 years, has proven itself completely incompatible with Western liberal values and democracy, is still proving so to this day [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] , and allowing them to run amok in your society? Or, taking whatever steps are necessary to prevent the deaths of your own people, at the hands of the followers of that ideology?

I’m not one to get into scaremongering and witch hunts, but at the same time, I think we need to be vigilant and to look out for our own wellbeing first and foremost. Western civilisation was not built by the followers of Islam. Indeed, for most of our history, we have been fighting to keep Islam out of our lands. They have absolutely no moral claim to share in the benefits of the societies that our own ancestors created for us. In the last 70 years or so, we’ve relaxed our immigration policies towards them, and this has been a disaster for us.

Ideally, I would prefer to see a sane immigration policy brought in again, in which we still allow the immigration of qualified professionals (Doctors, IT specialists, engineers etc), regardless of their racial, religious, or national background, but don’t allow unskilled workers in anymore. We have no need for them, and we have no moral obligation to take them in. I think this would be the best solution. However, I can’t see that changing any time soon, so at least having a way to monitor those coming in would be a nice start. If they don’t like it, then they’re quite free to just not come. Our safety in our own countries is more important than making sure that they’re not offended in countries that they are CHOOSING to come to.

None of the above videos are in any way comparable to a “Muslim database” obviously, but the point I’m trying to make by posting them is that it’s nothing unusual for them to show up and get offended by things in their host nations, even though they willingly chose to come to them.

But Takei, who was interned with his family in wartime, shot back with articulate fury Thursday on MSNBC’s “The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell.”

“It is not a precedent,” Takei said in the MSNBC exchange. “It is the most disgraceful chapter of American history.”

Really? I thought slavery was. Or possibly the eugenic program. Or perhaps those pointless wars in the Middle East which were based on lies. Or maybe it was the conquest of the American landmass in the first place. The “most disgraceful” chapter tends to change, depending on the narrative being pushed at the time.

“Registration of any group of people, and certainly registration of Muslims, is a prelude to internment,” he said later. “This is something that we cannot have happen again. It is dangerous and it is a moral bankruptcy. We’ve got to stand up and resist this, and I would urge all good Americans to write to your congressional representatives and the president-elect and tell them that this is not what we stand for as a nation.”

Very touching George. Your concern for Muslims is most impressive, especially seeing as you yourself are an openly gay man. Lets take a look at these two maps.

The first is a map of Muslim majority countries in the world.


Next, we have a map of countries in which being gay is illegal.

Countries where being gay is illegal.

Notice the amount of overlap between the two maps? And with the huge number of Muslims who seem to agree with these laws, even in the West, I can’t help but wonder, would they be as concerned about his well-being as he is about theirs?

Probably not.
“Turkeys against Christmasphobia”.

“Equality snow removal”? WTF?

So apparently snow plowing as we know it is sexist. I never knew that myself, but that’s probably because I’m a straight white male who is too blinded by his own privilege to notice. Luckily for us, our favourite nation of politically correct lunatics Sweden, were able to recognise this serious issue for what it is, and have made a point of making snow plowing more equal. “How so?”, you might ask. Well, read on.

From SVT Nyheter (Translated by Google)

The equality snow removal, has not worked, according to the opposition Vice Mayor Cecilia Brinck (M). According to her, they have not focused on plowing bike paths.

Snow removal should be equal, it has the rödgrönrosa majority in the town hall held.In practice this means that pedestrian and bicycle paths should be prioritized before the roads. Women walking or riding public transport more often than men more often choose car. But the opposition asking themselves how well the equality snow removal really worked. 

So let me see if I understand this correctly. They have this idea that when it snows, they should plow pedestrian and bike paths as a priority over plowing roads because women on average are more likely to walk than men, who are more likely to take a car. They are doing this because of “equality” somehow.

Ok… lets see how this turns out.

“Just as bad for everyone”

– Some places have not snöröjts at all, and it’s just as bad for everyone. We have received quite a lot of reports that it has prioritized bike lanes in front walkways.

I’m assuming that “snöröjts”, which didn’t successfully translate, must refer to cyclists, based on the rest of the sentence.

Most of those bikes are men so I do not know how equal it is.

Although I’m sure in feminist Sweden, if most were women, it would be just fine.

Now pedestrians must walk on the bike lanes because they can not walk on her foot paths and cyclists and pedestrians may not even during good relationship get along really well on the same surface, says Cecilia Brinck (M). 

Cecilia Brinck (M) says to SVT News Stockholm to snow removal so far is beneath contempt. Although the snow did Stockholmers by storm, so the city had been able to be better prepared.

So this equality snow plowing isn’t working out apparently. Lets read on to find out why.

Opposition: Insanely give fines

– This SMHI has warned for several days. So enough by the powers could have been better prepared to deal with these snow cover. After all, it is no surprise that it’s snowing in Stockholm in winter, says Cecilia Brinck (M). It is clear that with better preparedness could have been sure that it did not happen. Now it is apparently also true that you are out and give parking tickets to cars that have been unable to get out due to the snow.


So because they prioritised the paths rather than the roads, cars are unable to use the roads at all and through no fault of their own, the motorists are getting parking fines.

“Parking outside the specified times is not allowed. That will be 2000 Krona please.”


I think that also is completely insane. It is an extraordinary situation, and then you have to be flexible. It is the city’s task to remove the snow and before you have done that, you can not go around punishing motorists for not coming out.  

And yet they do so anyway despite the fact that they’re the ones to blame. This is hilarious. They’re so concerned about gender equality that they chose to focus on plowing the less essential footpaths because women are more likely to use them, over the more essential roads, which are more likely to be used by men, and now they’re punishing the motorists, many of whom are probably women, for their own stupid decision.

“Next time, I’m walking to work.”

Only in Sweden does this insanity make sense.

What do you think of the term “gender snow removal”? 

I think “what the fuck is going on in this world? How did we get to this point?”

– I think it’s a little silly if I’ll be frank. In particular, since it does not really mean that big changes from how we worked before, except that then prioritizes bicycle paths higher than what we have done. We have not received any clear information on what this means in practice because it was relatively correct little snow last winter.

It’s going to get a whole lot worse. Let me give you a potential scenario.

Imagine there was a medical emergency (for example, an elderly lady has a heart attack), that requires an ambulance to be dispatched. Now lets imagine, that the ambulance is unable to make the journey, because the snow on the road is too deep. You do have snow plows, but instead of using them to clear the road, you have them clearing the footpaths instead. So that elderly lady ends up dying because the ambulance couldn’t get to her in time.

“At least the footpaths are clear so women can walk without any discomfort.”

She literally just died in the name of gender equality. -_-