Ireland might make its gender recognition laws looser.

134tfj
If only things were this simple in *current year*

For a long time, I’ve tried my best to understand and make sense of the transgender issue, but even after all this time, I’m still no closer to doing so. It’s not that I don’t feel any sense of sympathy or compassion for what these people are going through. It’s just that after all this time, I’ve yet to see any compelling scientific evidence that a quote, unquote “sex change” actually does meet the criteria for turning people into the opposite sex. As far as I can see, all it does is take vulnerable people with severe mental health problems, irreparably mutilate their bodies, and turn them into a poor imitation of what they aspire to be.

1xpgpg
I would say that you need to check into your local Miniluv for re-education, so we can fix those doubleplusungood thoughts of yours.

Yet despite these very real reasons that make many people, myself included, feel skeptical, the issue only seems to be getting more attention and becoming a much bigger deal, with absolutely no attempt being made to address our skepticisms . I think really since around the time that Bruce Jenner transitioned, the issue has been heavily pushed by the media and the political establishment as the next big “civil rights frontier” to overcome. We’re led to believe that the reason why we’re hearing so much more about it today is because of “greater awareness”, “greater understanding”, and that more transpeople are “finding the courage” to come forward because of this.

I personally don’t buy it myself. I am not a scientist, so I don’t have the empirical evidence to back up what I’m about to say, but this is my own personal belief, based on observation and contemplation. I personally believe that there are two different kinds of transgender people, similar in a way to how there are two different types of diabetes. Type A, are people who are born with their brain wired differently than what is typical for their biological sex. These people are naturally transgender, and make up that tiny minority who have always existed. There’s probably no way that these people will ever be able to come to terms with their biological sex, and while I don’t personally think that transitioning is a good idea in general, it’s probably the best solution for addressing their specific cases.

Type B on the other hand are a product of nurture rather than nature, and are I believe, the vast majority of cases, particularly the cases that have come in the past few years. The average human brain is not fully developed until around the age of 25 and even then, neuroplasticity, is a thing. The human brain can rewire itself based on external stimuli. Therefore, is it really that hard to consider the possibility that when the media is heavily pushing something, and SJW parents and teachers are encouraging it, that this can have an effect on how children think, and this could be what actually accounts for the massive rise in transgender kids the last few years?

1
The article doesn’t even attempt to answer the question in the headline at all. It does however draw attention to the fact that the number of children looking to transition increased by 1000% in just 5 years. Why isn’t this a cause for alarm exactly?
1
My guess, is promoting it so hard at a time when society is collapsing. When life sucks, and people don’t understand why exactly, is it really hard to believe that they might conclude that the problem is something internal rather than external? “I’m not unhappy because I live in a fucked up world. I must be unhappy because of my gender identity. If I transition, I’ll feel better.”

What a strange coincidence here. The parent is trans, and the child is too. Clearly the child came to this decision zirself, and not because of the prompting of the parent.

So if my theory is correct, and the majority of the recent transgender cases fall into the Type B category, then would it not be logical to try and prevent these kids from dealing with the mental health issues in the first place, and potentially have to undergo the highly damaging surgery, by not glamourising it so much, and by not drawing so much attention to it? If it wasn’t being pushed so heavily, there would be much less cases of the Type B, and therefore much less children having to suffer the associated problems of struggling with their gender identity. By all means, have facilities in place to try and identify and help those who fall into the Type A category, but as things stand, the media and activists conflate both the majority Type B and the minority Type A into one category, and in my opinion, this is completely wrong.

JLB-Meme-Transgender.jpg
What could possibly go wrong? You know other than the possibility that they might fall into the 70-80%, who end up changing their minds and regretting their transition.

Anyway, that was a pretty long introduction to what is in fact, a very brief article that I wished to share.

From Irish Examiner

A review of Ireland’s gender recognition laws is to be brought before the Cabinet this morning.

It reportedly recommends making it easier for children to change their gender.

17884223_1371722649532891_868922556377170949_n
Sounds legit.

Commissioned by Social Protection Minister Regina Doherty, it is understood the report recommends letting children officially change their gender without going to court.

Regina Doherty, who is a high ranking member of Ireland’s Fine Gael party.

Never forget, that Fine Gael are supposed to be Ireland’s “right wing conservative party”. They brought Ireland the Gay Marriage referendum. They brought Ireland the Abortion referendum. They’ve talked about making free (ie., tax-payer funded) contraception readily available. Our current Taoiseach is best buds with that snivelling worm, Justin Trudeau. And now, we’re getting this rhetoric from them.

But yeah people are still delusional enough to think that they’re totally a right wing conservative party, because the Overton window has moved so far to the left, that full on Communists are now mainstream, and centrist parties like Fine Gael, seem far right in comparison.

Children under 16 would be allowed to register the change on documents as long as they have parental consent.

Parental consent? Oh dear that’s such an outdated attitude to have. Why should parents have any say in any life changing decisions that their children wish to make? I think maybe Leo should take some advice from how things are done in the country of his good buddy Trudeau.

dirjfee0cb811
“Taking children away from their parents is OK… except when Trump does it to illegal immigrants of course.”

It would take the decision out of the courts unless there is a situation where one parent does not consent to the change or if there are mental health concerns.

I’m sure we can guess which parent the court will side with in such a scenario.

There have been calls for the minister to publish the report findings, which will likely be done after it is noted by Cabinet this morning.

I look forward to seeing the report. Actually to be honest, I really don’t care.

I can’t see this situation ending well at all. I can see many vulnerable kids with mental health problems, being encouraged to do something that is not in their best interests at all. And then when they end up realising that they’ve made a mistake, as so many do, and feel as if suicide is their only option, because they’ve destroyed their bodies and ruined their lives, do you think those who encouraged them, are going to accept any responsibility for it? Do you think they’ll honestly reflect on their own behaviour and think “maybe it was a bad idea to encourage this”?

I personally don’t think they will.

Advertisements

The Brits have finally had enough

Following recent events such as a man being charged with a hate crime for teaching his pug Roman salutes, a convicted paedophile getting his sentence delayed to go on holiday, and the arrest of Tommy Robinson, simply for reporting on a court case involving Muslim child rape gangs, I made the suggestion that the United Kingdom (now commonly known as “Cuck Island“), was a contender to Sweden’s throne for the most shameful, laughing stock in all of Europe. Well after what I have just learned today, I have to take it back. There is still some will to live left in the Brits, and it looks as if they have finally reached the limits of their patience.

GirlRapeUK
They finally managed to push them too far.

If you’re wondering what I’m referring to, then please watch the following videos.

And my favourite video of all…

And these are all just a small sample of what’s happening. I’m not even counting the videos that show what is happening inside prisons (it’s basically just more of the same).

Look ideally, I would like it if all European countries existed under a system of law and order, were suspected criminals were properly investigated by the authorities, given a fair trial if enough evidence was found to justify trying them, and if found guilty, given an appropriate sentence, depending on the severity of their crimes.

hanged-drawn-quartered-og
For convicted child rapists…

But the UK has failed miserably in that regard. Or rather, I don’t know if you can really refer to it as a “failure”, when it was done that way on purpose, but I’m sure you know what I mean. For the past four decades or so in the UK, there has been an epidemic of young white English girls being groomed, raped, and tortured by men of a primarily Muslim background, with the authorities not only failing to do anything about it, but actively helping to conceal it from the general public.  Instead, they’ve been focusing their time and effort on punishing those who speak the truth about what has been happening. This isn’t simple incompetence. This is a massive betrayal of the people they are sworn to protect and serve.

So with the proper channels failing to protect these children, is it really that hard to understand why the ordinary, working class, white Brits, are feeling as if they have no other choice, but to take justice into their own hands? If the police and justice system won’t protect them, then they’ll protect themselves. If the police and justice system won’t punish these rape gangs, then they’ll punish them themselves. You might not agree with their methods, but they’ve been pushed into this situation against their will, and they obviously feel like this is the only option left to them. And personally, I really can’t blame them one bit.

While it is sad to see that things have gotten this far, it is promising to know, that people haven’t given up the will to fight back entirely. While I do unfortunately think that we’re long past the point of finding a peaceful solution to the problems facing Europe, I at least take solace knowing that when shit does inevitably hit the fan, that people won’t just lay down and die. They will resist afterall. And as long as people are willing to resist, there’s still hope.

US Supreme court rules in favour of baker who refused to make gay wedding cake.

c42eac0f3eb921610de75baafb841b39--political-issues-political-satire

I want you all to imagine a scenario. Lets say there was a gay man who owned a bakery. One day, a group of conservative Christians came in and demanded that he bake them a cake with a “Support traditional marriage” message, written on it in icing. The gay baker has no problem serving them because of their religious views, but he doesn’t feel comfortable baking a cake with that particular message because in doing so, he is being asked to participate in something that doesn’t match his own values.

He politely declines and suggests instead that the customers go to another bakery, and even recommends one that will have no problem fulfilling their request. Instead of taking their business elsewhere like normal adults, the Christians decide to sue the gay baker for discriminating against their religion, and destroy his livelihood. They do this because they specifically chose this baker knowing that he was gay, and knowing he wouldn’t be willing to make such a cake. It was never about the cake. It was about bullying the gay baker into doing something he wasn’t comfortable with, under threat of the loss of his livelihood. Does this sound morally justifiable to you? If your answer is no, then why is it morally acceptable when the reverse happens?

Well we’ve had plenty of cases of the reverse happen over the years. In fact, one of my very first posts on this blog was in relation to a similar situation that took place in Northern Ireland. However, today’s story is in relation to a case that occurred in America.

1
This is basically what happened.

A baker was sued by a gay couple for refusing to bake a gay wedding cake, and after years in the legal system, the supreme court ruled in favour of the baker.

From Irish Independent

The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a Christian baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple, saying the decision was unlikely to have a sweeping legal impact.

The nation’s highest court said the baker’s religious rights were violated when a state Civil Rights Commission decided he had broken Colorado’s anti-discrimination law.

Like it or not, religious freedom is under the same legal protection as sexuality is. There was absolutely no need for this case to ever go as far as it did. It was obvious that they were just “butthurt” (and not in the way they like), that this man didn’t fawn all over them.

The refusal by baker Jack Phillips in 2012 to make a cake for David Mullins and Charlie Craig became a cultural flashpoint, seen as part of a conservative Christian backlash to the Supreme Court’s ruling allowing gay marriage.

It probably was, but it changes nothing. There was no need to sue over this. The free market would have sorted this problem out quite easily. If he wasn’t interested in the potentially lucrative money that could have come from baking gay wedding cakes, then some other baker would have taken the business instead. The gay couples still get their wedding cakes, the Christian bakers get to live in their little niche, and a business opportunity opens up for other bakers, who aren’t devout Christians. Everybody would have won.

But of course, it was never about this. The cake wasn’t what they wanted. Forcing the baker to do what they wanted was the real motivation. If we look at the history of the gay rights movement, it has followed a particular path. In more homophobic times, all they wanted was tolerance. They just wanted to be left to live their lives in peace, free from persecution, and most reasonable people thought this was fair enough, and tolerance was extended.

After tolerance, came the desire to be accepted. They didn’t just want to be tolerated. They wanted to be accepted as equal members of society who didn’t have to hide away from the rest of us, and once again, most reasonable people had no problem with this. What’s the harm in accepting them as equals? If things had stopped right here most people, both gay and straight would have been perfectly happy, because fairness had finally been achieved.

But there were a few who wanted more than this. It wasn’t enough for these ones to simply be equal. They wanted to be pandered to, treated as special beings, and to have the rest of society participate in their lifestyle with them. And if the rest of society refused to participate in their lifestyle with them, they would use the power of the state to force them to do so.

i2bntdzndqqz.jpg
“State enforced homosexuality.” Comedienne Sam Hyde, predicted it in his satirical Ted Talk prank (14:40) back in 2013.

President Donald Trump’s administration intervened in support of the baker.

But the Supreme Court ruling did not address broader questions of religious exemptions from anti-discrimination laws or whether baking a cake is protected as free speech under the U.S. Constitution, experts said.

So we’ll be seeing more of these cases in the future then it seems. It isn’t over yet.

“The broad rule that the bakery was looking for here was that it had a license to discriminate,” said James Essex, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“They most emphatically did not get that ruling from this court today.”

If he was still willing to sell them things despite knowing they were gay, then how exactly was he looking to discriminate? He just wasn’t willing to bake a cake for a specific event that his religious views made him uncomfortable with. Would you say the same thing to a Muslim baker who refused to do the same thing?

2.jpg
I think we know the answer.

The decision made it clear that even if the court ultimately rules in a future case that bakers or other businesses that sell creative products such as florists and wedding photographers can avoid punishment under anti-discrimination laws, most businesses open to the public would have no such defense.

Because there is a difference between refusing to serve someone because of their sexuality, and refusing to use your labour to participate in something that you have religious objections to. The baker didn’t refuse to serve them because they were gay, so this comparison is meaningless.

Nonetheless, the couple, Mullins and Craig, said they were disappointed.

images
“Why did we lose?”

“No one should have to face the shame, embarrassment and humiliation of being told ‘we don’t serve your kind here’ that we faced,” they said on an ACLU conference call with reporters.

HE WAS WILLING TO SERVE “YOUR KIND”, YOU FUCKING WHINER!!!!

He just wasn’t willing to participate in an an event that contradicted his religious views. You were perfectly free to buy a product from the store. He just wasn’t willing to bake a specific cake for you. You want to talk about the mental harm you experienced? What about the mental harm the baker experienced by being caught between his desire not to “sin” in the eyes of his God, and his desire to make a living, when you could have just had the maturity to take your business elsewhere?

Annise Parker, head of the LGBTQ Victory Institute, expressed concern it could “open the floodgates” to discrimination.

“Homophobic forces will purposefully over-interpret the ruling and challenge existing non-discrimination laws by refusing service to LGBTQ people … denying them dinner at a restaurant, lodging at a hotel, or renting an apartment,” Parker said in a statement.

Funny isn’t it how the “slippery slope” suddenly isn’t a logical fallacy anymore?

The Human Rights Coalition echoed the view that the ruling “did not change our nation’s fundamental civil rights laws.”

“Regardless of today’s decision, the fact remains that LGBTQ people face alarming levels of discrimination all across the country,” the civil rights group said.

There’s few countries on the planet right now, were “LGBTQ” people face less discrimination, than in the United States. In a country were this is acceptable (warning, NSFW), you can hardly claim to be discriminated against. This reaction is completely hysterical.

Essex added that the issue is “not about cakes.”

Which as I’ve stated above, I agree with.

“It is about access to health care.

No

It’s about access to education.

No

It’s about employment.

No

It’s about people being fired from jobs because their employer has a religious objection to who they are,” he said. The ACLU represented the gay couple.

People being fired from their jobs because their employer has a religious objection to who they are? What about people like this baker potentially being forced out of his job, because you have an objection to his religious views?

“There is an intentional campaign out there of people who are opposed to LGBT rights but also to equality more broadly,” he said. “I’m sure they are out there saying this is a broad victory.”

Colorado Christian University President Donald Sweeting called it “an enormous milestone victory” for “religious freedom and freedom of conscience.”

“We are grateful that the court upheld these today,” he said in a statement.

They’re so used to getting their own way in everything that they do, that they have zero ability to self-reflect, and assume that the only people who could possibly be glad about this result are homophobes, who don’t want them to have any rights. They are incapable of understanding how obnoxious they themselves have become, and to reconsider their own behaviour.

And for that reason, you can be sure that this issue is not going to die anytime soon.

Youth suicide (plus attempts) doubles in less than a decade in America.

We keep hearing about how the world is progressing. But progressing towards “what” exactly? To me, it seems as if the world is getting a whole lot worse, rather than better, and if this latest story is anything to go by, it seems that a lot of young people in America agree with me.

From Newsweek

The rate of children and teens thinking about or attempting suicide has soared in the last decade, with hospitalizations doubling between 2008 and 2015.

2008-2015. Notice anything about those years? Well someone in the comments section sure did.

Untitled

Now I’m not going to say that this rise can be blamed on Obama specifically, because correlation =/= causation. However, I want to take people back to 2008. The result of the 2008 election was portrayed to the public as offering…

Barack_Obama_Hope_poster

And…

larger

…after the disastrous eight years under Bush. Sure the worst financial crisis since the 1929 Great Depression was only just beginning, but there was still a lot of optimism, that things would get better, and that society was progressing. The election of Obama was a symbol of that expected progress. But here we are almost a decade later, and all that hope was for nothing. I don’t blame Obama specifically for that., but I can’t deny that things did not turn out the way the majority of us were expecting.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recently published a study of children and teen hospitalizations related to suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SA). They found that in 2008, 0.8 percent of hospitalizations at surveyed children’s hospitals were for suicide attempts and thoughts. In 2015, it was 1.82 percent.

Wow so it actually more than doubled then.

It’s a significant increase that affected all age groups in the study of people 17 and under. The older age groups had higher rates of SI and SA than younger groups.

Dr. Gregory Plemmons, of the Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt University, told CBS News that depression and anxiety were rising among kids and teens, and that social media could be making it worse.

I don’t think social media is the main culprit somehow, though I’ll wait until the end, before I provide my own theories.

Mainstream media may also play a role in affecting suicide rates. In the past, media coverage of celebrity suicides was linked to increased suicides among the public—so much so that there are written media guidelines on how to avoid killing your readers. The Netflix series 13 Reasons Why was criticized by suicide prevention experts as dangerous and glamorizing teen suicide. After the first season of the show, Google searches for “teen suicide,” “suicide hotline” and “how to commit suicide” spiked.

This still doesn’t explain why these young people are feeling so depressed and anxious in the first place, that they would even consider suicide an option. It doesn’t matter how much you “glamorize” it, mentally healthy people, do not start killing themselves. There are obviously problems which are causing them to feel suicidal in the first place, problems which clearly got much worse between the years 2008 and 2015, and probably beyond that timeframe as well. Blaming the mainstream media and social media, seems to be about diverting away from the real causes.

The National Institute of Health encourages parents and physicians to know the warning signs of suicidal thoughts and take action. It recommends that doctors ask their patients if they are thinking about suicide, taking those thoughts seriously and restricting access to items they could use to kill themselves, like guns. The organization also suggests that doctors help such patients connect with resources like suicide hotlines and follow up later.

All very good advice, but it ultimately seems to be about managing the damage, rather than preventing the damage in the first place.

So anyway, I said earlier on that I was going to provide my own theory as to why this is happening, so here it is. The increasing rate of youth suicide attempts is not an isolated phenomenon. It’s just one of many symptoms of a society that is rapidly heading towards collapse. Other symptoms of this collapse include, but are not limited to:

  • Mass unemployment and underemployment.
  • Lack of job security for those who do still have jobs / Gig Economy.
  • Houses being completely unaffordable, even for a couple who both work, each earning the average industrial wage.
  • High taxation, without any visible improvement in services. In fact in many ways, services have actually gotten worse.
  • Poverty
  • People lacking a sense of community and camaraderie. General sense of isolation and alienation.
  • A decrease in law and order (for genuine criminals)
  • At the same time, an increase in persecution of the otherwise law abiding for frivolous reasons (commonly referred to as anarcho-tyranny).
  • Terrorist attacks happening on a frequent basis.
  • Natives being ethnically displaced in their own countries by invaders, that are being helped by their own governments.
  • (In America specifically) Mass shootings happening on a much more regular basis, even though gun laws haven’t gotten any more liberal in the same time period.
  • An increase in racial tensions and conflict.
  • Mental illnesses not only being normalised, but celebrated, and with demands that everyone else deny their own perception of reality and celebrate them as well (eg, recognising dozens of fictional genders with punishments for those who refuse to).
  • Obesity and the associated health risks on the rise.
  • Degenerate modern “art”.
  • Young people learning about sex from hardcore pornography.
  • Said young people becoming addicted to pornography, which warps their ideas and expectations on sex.
  • Terrible dynamics between males and females, resulting in both ending up lonely, unhappy, and resentful towards the other (ie. “cat ladies” and “MGTOW/Incels”).
  • A huge number of marriages that end in divorce, destroying the lives of at least one of the spouses, and any children involved.
  • Plenty of others that I can’t think of right now off the top of my head.

So when you look at all these problems that are effecting every Western country, is it not easy to understand “why” we’re seeing such a massive increase in suicides? The Obama years really seemed to kick things up a gear, in regards to many of the aforementioned problems, not just in America, but also here in Europe? We keep hearing about all the social/political developments that have taken place such as:

  • Feminism
  • Mass immigration from vastly different cultures than our own
  • Constant wars in the Middle East
  • Industry moving to the third world
  • Political censorship on social media
  • “Hate speech” legislation
  • Attacks on “toxic” masculinity
  • “Health at any size” propaganda
  • Mass population drugging
  • The easy availability of pornography
  • The Sexual Revolution
  • The destruction of marriage.
  • A media which tells only one side of the story on important issues.
  • Children being raised in daycare, because both parents have no other choice but to work
  • Property speculation

…and many other developments, have been sold to us as “good things” and “progress”. But the evidence seems to suggest the opposite. If the majority of peoples lives are worse off than ever, then how can any of this be progress? It makes no sense. That is, until you look at it from the perspective, that this is exactly how it’s supposed to be going. That all this “progress” is working how it was actually intended. That is, it was never intended to make things better. It was actually always about harming us.

And in that sense, mission accomplished.

 

A small sample of what we’re up against: Part 6

Yes, it’s that time again. A time when I take screenshots of the insanity that is currently plaguing society, just to give an overview of what we’re dealing with. I figured it has been a while since my last post in this series, so I may as well get another one out. Anyway, lets get on with it.

2MUs2m7ozvNc2NSc6m1fO-4dskPiyRJJafF-HSZuyMQ
“Male”” and “Female” are indeed a classification that we made. However, we made them specifically to describe something which does exist in nature. Even if we were to do away with those words, these things would still exist and still be distinct from one another. By Riley’s logic, the different animals that we refer to as “cats” and “dogs” don’t inherently exist in nature, because it was us who came up with those words to classify these animals.
3UpINBgYDL3WHFhgeyD6CEbM_ohxMtRCvhL0Q_xAHPs
And Riley strikes again. Thank you Riley for educating me on my preferences. I thought I had a preference for vaginas over penises, because that’s just normal for straight people, but I was actually unknowingly pressured into conforming to certain arbitrary societal norms. Isn’t it funny how one of the biggest arguments against gay conversion therapy, is that gay people can’t be influenced to change their sexual preferences, but apparently us straight people can be influenced to change ours?
9xY6mEh.jpg
No
35943.jpg
At least she was honest that she’ll never lose the weight, I’ll giver her that. This is what the media is now trying to promote as a “Supermodel” btw. Say goodbye to the catwalk, and please give a warm welcome to the “elephantwalk”.
AkGPMPV
Idiot thinks “Mexican” is a language. A language that white people can’t be allowed to speak. Somebody please get this message to all those white people in Spain who have the audacity to culturally appropriate the beautiful Mexican language.
c8UWR5yXsoGPG1JL_O01ElqWXkAcnNnGIw_BiT3Doag
I don’t even understand how you can possibly think that jeans and gender, are comparable. I’m actually too confused by this to even make a snarky comment.
pocracist
“POC” can date whomever they want. White people on the other hand must date POC, whether they find them attractive or not. It’s racist if white people date other white people. Remember, as I keep saying, they want nothing less than for us to go extinct as a race. Whether by exterminating us, or just breeding us out of existence. It really doesn’t matter, as long as we cease to exist.
pZA6T_HEHfwIn7-FKFMShxLDqiDFtjVrqbYS43mNjAY
LOL, now they’re starting to turn against gay men as well, because they aren’t oppressed enough anymore. I’ve no sympathy for them. I hope they all these “marginalised” groups, eat each other alive.
Q7OWn5s
Or maybe males are just naturally more confident and outgoing in terms of speaking up.
qBdEJBb.png
When I think of “biggest victim complex”, I’d actually say the biggest contenders would be: Feminists, Jews, American Blacks, Muslims, and Transgenders, not necessarily in that order. Hmm… I pick Jews as the winner.
Qc56tM3
Do I really need to add anything here?
qDAN1tFnrrLa7ZUB-EZhsI93uFZbsmwCxx5vS0rAnp0
And this is why you shouldn’t try to be a “white ally”. They won’t think of you as “one of the good ones”, because as far as they’re concerned, there are no good white people. They’ll always despise you, with the added bonus, that they’ll consider you a weakling and an easy target.
QHG0JagfYywdUPOjWDzUTez1U5vPCCQT_Y61QqQ31tc
“Torzath” here, apparently knows more about biology than actual biologists.
J0nj9fPl5VJdLyiwwtUbr7lSY0T0sHGWa9pKEVu7PO0
I don’t think she has the self awareness to understand her hypocrisy here.
J8Ubq8y
Here’s a perfect example of one of those “wannabe white allies”. Do you think this will win him/her any respect? Nope, I guarantee that it will just be seen as the pathetic virtue signalling that it is.
J80_4IgL27KjhgITrhE4YvacdAev7LbfCjdtxbMY2gA
Ok fatty, sit down on that reinforced chair over there, and let me tell you a little secret. There are actually, get this, two types of diabetes. One that you do indeed sometimes get when you’re born. But the other kind, you get from being fat.
jQ7JdNeZ2szL_Hp-NsKpGzrnVNtZakHetE7_4oX4fdU.png
Damn I had no idea. Muslim homophobia has nothing to do with Islamic beliefs. It’s all the fault of Christians. Muslims are always blameless, no matter what they do. Christians and white people, are responsible for everything wrong in the world.
jCVMq07FxNwbpRnGbk0BZRc2Iq-78snealWPr579ctI
Except every race did do that. White people were just more successful at it.
Js3DHgM
Another example of how our sexual preferences (except those of gay people) are up for negotiation.
jTRy1tzah8FvkEBFwiK14wkNd38_L9gsge5vX3UoKIs.png
Does that mean it’s also racist, if Japanese people watch Western cartoons, dubbed in Japanese? I think we know the answer to that.

And that’s it for now, but there will be more parts coming in the future.

My thoughts on the “suemepaddy” hashtag.

So a few days ago, I gave my thoughts on the social media backlash surrounding the verdict in the recent high profile Belfast rape trial. I mentioned that I’d never before, seen so much anger from an online lynch mob (in Ireland at least), and in the few days since, I think it has only gotten worse. One of the things I mentioned in my post was the comment made by Senator Aodhán Ó Ríordáin on twitter, which I believed at the time could potentially be considered defamatory in nature.

29542408_131448041028499_7560656259369434519_n
The quote again, just to remind you. To me, it seems he’s implying that they’re definitely guilty, but only got off because of their class background, rather than because of the evidence.

Well it seems that the solicitors for one of the defendants, Paddy Jackson, felt the same way, because the very next day it was announced that they would be pursuing legal action against him. So how does the online lynch mob respond? Do they stop to think that maybe an innocent man is simply trying to do everything he can to salvage his destroyed reputation, by standing up for himself against those who are defaming him? Of course they don’t. Instead, their natural conclusion is that he’s just a money hungry scumbag, looking to make a quick buck at the expense of an innocent public figure, who was simply giving his opinion on the matter. They’ve gone as far as to create a twitter hashtag, “suemepaddy”, were hundreds of them reiterate their belief that he’s definitely guilty, and dare him to try and sue them as well. Lets take a look at some of the posts that are using the hashtag.

I agree that he’s a disgusting person. The text messages speak for themselves. Unfortunately, being all the things that are mentioned here, are not evidence of being a rapist.

No. He’s not suing people who “believe the victim”. People are free to believe what they want. He’s suing people who are publicly making defamatory comments about him.

That could just mean another 8525 people to sue then. Or it could just mean more trouble for Aodhán Ó Ríordáin, as it would further prove how damaging his original comment.

It is “entitlement” to attempt to defend your reputation now apparently. He should just shut up and let everyone make defamatory comments about him.

He sure did, and for that alone, he should be called out for. It STILL doesn’t prove that he’s guilty of rape though.

It’s “factually accurate” that he only got off because he’s “well-connected” and “middle-class”.

I actually think that it’s the people on your side who haven’t. The more of you who use this hashtag, the more attention you draw to the original defamatory tweet, and thus the more potential trouble you cause for Aodhán.

And there are countless other tweets in the hashtag, but I’ll leave it at that. The thing is, as I’ve said before, I don’t have a gut feeling on the truth of this case either way. As far as I’m concerned, it could be a case were justice was done, and innocent men were acquitted, or it could be a case were the justice system failed, and guilty men did get away. But whichever it was, I don’t have the information to confirm either way, and neither does anyone else who are commenting.

Yes, it sucks that it’s so difficult to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in these cases, but what is the alternative? Do we instead change to a default of “guilty until proven innocent” and put the burden of proof on the defendants? Or do we just automatically take accusers at their word, and skip the trial entirely? And does this new policy only apply to rape cases, or in regards to all types of crime? Do we require people to video tape all their sexual encounters, in order to prove their innocence, and if the tape gets “lost”, do we assume that they’re actually hiding the truth and automatically convict them anyway? Do we get people to sign contracts before engaging in sexual activity? If so, what happens when someone claims they were forced to sign the contract against their will and then raped? Do we then make sure to require witnesses to be around for the signing, to make sure it was entered into willingly? And do they have to sign a new contract every single time they plan to engage in sexual activity? Where does it all end? Is there an actual plan in the works to deal with these problems at all, or is it just nothing more than an excuse to get outraged and virtue signal to the world.

And in regards to the outrage, I want to ask those of you who are involved, this very simple question.

Where were you when this happened?

1.png

Or when this happened?

2

Or how about this?

3

Remember the big events from Cologne a few years back?

4

And of course, don’t even get me started on Sweden.

5

I could go on and on and on, but I think I’ve made my point. There have been countless examples over the past few years, of women and girls being victimised sexually all over Europe and in many cases, in ways far more brutal than what is alleged to have happened in Belfast. Where was the feminist outrage? Where were the twitter hashtags? When did the marches take place? The reality, is that when all these incidents took place, the current social media lynch mob were silent. They didn’t speak out against what was happening to women and girls then. In fact, in many cases, they attacked those who were.

6

So forgive me, if I’m a bit skeptical when I hear these people now coming out and talking about how much they want to protect women and impose justice on those who harm them. They didn’t seem to care much about all the women and girls who have been raped, tortured, and in some cases, killed, by the very real rape culture that is making its way into Europe. Quite the opposite actually. They’ve thrown their fellow females under the bus, in favour of bringing in even more of the rape culture.

racists-rapists
I know the picture is a fake, but it’s not far off how they actually think. Or at least, how they’re acting without thinking.

The vast majority of people are easily led sheep. And the majority of those who are involved in this lynch mob, have no genuine care for the wellbeing of their fellow human beings at all. They don’t care about that woman, or what she may have gone through. They just see an outrage bandwagon to jump on, so they jump on it. When there’s no bandwagon to jump on, as there never is in regards to “oppressed groups” like Muslim rapists, they’re too damn cowardly and apathetic to say anything at all. They stay silent in those situations, but save their outrage for the easy targets, like the “smug, well-connected, middle-class” white men.

And this is why I have so little faith in humanity.

 

Belfast verdict causes outrage.

I’ve said it many times before, and I’m going to say it again. We live in a world that has gone completely insane. I honestly don’t know how much more of this insanity I can take. It feels like everyday, something happens that makes me lose even more faith in humanity.

Today there was a verdict given in a rather high profile court case in Belfast, regarding an alleged rape. A young woman claimed to have been raped by two men at a party, with another two men acting as accessories to the crime. The accused men claimed that the sexual encounters were consensual. Today a jury of eight men and three women, after hearing the evidence presented for the past 41 days, declared all four men “not guilty” of all crimes, and they’re free to go. But of course in a world of social media, the story doesn’t end here. This verdict has generated absolute outrage.

29542408_131448041028499_7560656259369434519_n
A politician publicly speaking out against due process? Sounds like slander to me. No wonder he deleted this tweet soon after.

Now I’m going to be quite honest. I haven’t followed the trial, so I cant really give any comment on the evidence that was presented. But that’s not the point of this post. I didn’t make this post to give my own thoughts on whether the men are  actually guilty or not because I honestly don’t know. What I wanted to discuss is the reaction on social media, and the implications for those involved in the trial.

Because of the very public nature of the trial, and the fact that all four men have had their names and faces plastered all over the media, we now have one of two possible situations. We either have a group of innocent men, who have had their reputations destroyed by a false accusation and the ensuing trial by social media that followed. Regardless of being acquitted of the crime, these men will always be thought off as “rapists who got off” by a large contingent of the public.

Or alternatively, we have a high profile situation were the justice system failed to convict guilty men, and a victimised woman has had the added trauma of having her character dragged through the mud as a “liar” and a “slut”, in addition to the trauma of her experience. This will also have the added effect of discouraging future victims from coming forward. Why would you come forward when you see that your own character is going to be assassinated, and there’s a chance that you won’t get a conviction anyway?

Whether it’s a case of innocent men being falsely accused, or a genuine victim being slandered as a liar and a slut, an innocent party has just had their reputation destroyed. I put the blame on the media circus surrounding the trial and the hysterical mobs that inhabit social media. And believe me, the mob is very hysterical today. In this country at least, I don’t think I’ve ever seen such anger and division over a criminal verdict. And of course, it’s all emotional rather than logical. Vicious arguments between friends, who have a different interpretation of who was telling the truth and who wasn’t. “Feelings” being presented as “facts”. Talks of massive public marches in opposition to the verdict. Demands that the judge overturn the jury’s decision, etc. It’s all completely nuts.

29594991_10155225372681625_3393601792340896092_n
How do they know there are this many unreported rapists out there, if they’re not being reported? What is the actual evidence for these figures? Is there actual evidence at all, or is just more hysteria? Why can’t we have civil discussions anymore?

I really think we need to reassess how the media deals with cases like this. I think that because we (supposedly) operate under a system of “innocent until proven guilty” that the accused should have the right to anonymity during their trial, and this anonymity should be maintained if they’re acquitted. Now if they’re found guilty then absolutely, put their names and faces in every newspaper and every social media feed, and reveal to the world what despicable scum they are. But only if and when they’re found guilty. I also think that there should be less high profile reporting on these cases themselves while they are happening. It just creates a partisan situation, were people will take one side over the other from the beginning, and will only accept a verdict if it goes their way. With less high profile reporting on these cases, there’s less of a chance of people becoming so emotionally invested, and becoming so… well… emotionally unhinged to be quite honest.

South Africa votes to confiscate land from white farmers.

2014-world-mugabe-whites-cant-own-land-in-zimbabwe-by-29948441.png
“But… but… it will be different in South Africa somehow.”

I’ve been paying close attention to the situation unfolding in South Africa, over the past few years, because I believe that South Africa is a preview of the future facing all white majority countries, if we keep going down the current trajectory that we’re on. South Africa is just a few decades ahead of the rest of us.

From RT

The South African parliament voted on Tuesday in favor of a motion seeking to change the constitution to allow white-owned land expropriation without compensation.
Let this be a warning to any free speech advocating, gun owning, private property owning, white Americans out there. Your constitution is nothing more than a piece of paper. It won’t protect your rights, any more than the South African constitution protects the rights of South Africans, once you lose the demographic majority.

The motion, which was brought by Julius Malema – the leader of the radical Marxist opposition party, the Economic Freedom Fighters – passed by a wide margin of 241 votes to 83 against. 

“Marxist”

Every time.

FleeCommunismSocialism
South Africa won’t be any different.

Several parties – the Democratic Alliance, Freedom Front Plus, Cope and the African Christian Democratic Party – did not support the motion. The matter has been referred to the parliament’s Constitutional Review Committee, which must report back by August 30.

“The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice,”Malema told the parliament. “We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.”

They didn’t steal the land from anybody. Most of the land that makes up South Africa was sparsely populated wilderness, with only a small amount of native tribes living there. Those natives currently only make up about one percent of the South African population. In other words, most of the black population, which claim ownership of the “stolen land” settled there AFTER white Europeans had already settled in the country.

lj1
Would you look at that? The white population has stayed quite stable, whereas the black population has exploded, thanks to being able to feed off the productivity of the white farmers.

Whites began colonising the sparsely populated land now known as South Africa, in 1652. They created a functioning country out of nothing, and blacks came down from further north to try and share in the prosperity that these white settlers had created. At first there was a symbiotic relationship between the two groups. The blacks got access to higher standards of living than they had ever managed to create themselves, and the whites got access to a source of cheap labour, which they could use to help in their efforts to make something out of the country.

Over the past 150 years, black people have flooded into the country from other parts of Africa, in order to live off the productivity of these white settlers (very similar to what we’re seeing unfold in Europe now with the migrant crisis).  They’ve even been willing to risk getting killed and eaten by lions, just for the opportunity to live in a country that was built by white people. And now, instead of showing their gratitude to these white people, who gave them a better standard of living than they ever managed to create themselves, they want to steal the land from them. The land their white ancestors settled and made something of, and the land that these white farmers have used to feed them. All because they’ve bought into an idiotic notion, that these white people “stole” the land from them.

b0393dd134fdbed6033ea827a4d4bec1136bba95
This is what they actually believe. They also probably don’t understand that Black Panther’s Wakanda, isn’t real.

South Africa has a population of over 50 million people. According to a 2017 government audit, white people own 72 percent of farmland.

Because the white people are the descendants of the ones who settled the land in the first place. The majority of the non-white population, immigrated to the country later, after the land was already settled.

Last week, South Africa’s new president, Cyril Ramaphosa, pledged to return the lands owned by white farmers since the 1600s to the black citizens of the country. He added that food production and security must be preserved.

How can you “return” something to people who never owned it in the first place?

avoid-armed-robbery
“I want you to return your car to me.”
ApuFilm
“I want you to return the money in the cash register to me.”
burglar-trying
“I sure hope there’s a big screen TV in here that I can return to me.”

Also, good luck maintaining food production when you take the farms from the people who know how to work them, and “return” them to a bunch of incompetent morons, who don’t know what they’re doing.

The official opposition Democratic Alliance party (DA) has criticized the motion, saying it will undermine property rights and scare off potential investors.

Yep. Why would you invest in a country which has proven that it has no respect for property rights? Why start a business there, when it could potentially be seized by the government, if it ends up being successful?

The DA’s Thandeka Mbabama told the parliament that expropriation without compensation was a way to divert attention from the failure by successive ANC-led (African National Congress) governments.

Yep. Failures such as:

And these are just a few examples of failures, off the top of my head. I’m sure there are plenty of other problems as well, but this is nothing unusual. Every single sub-Saharan African country is an absolute joke, overrun with corruption and complete and utter idiocy. They are completely incapable of running a functioning country. Rather than creating any prosperity themselves, all they can do is steal from the productive elements of their society (the white minority in this case). But once the white minority isn’t around anymore to steal resources from, what will they do then?

It is shocking that at the current rate it will take 35 years to finalize (land) restitution claims lodged before 1998,” said Mbabama, who is deputy shadow minister for rural development and land reform.

It’s been more than two decades since the end of apartheid in the 1990s, and the ruling ANC party is still trying to tackle racial disparities in land ownership in South Africa.

If you have any sense, you would hope that it will take even longer than that. The sooner you do “tackle those racial disparities”, the sooner your country will end up like every other failed sub-Saharan African country. It’s not in your best interests longterm, to tackle them at all.

The president of farmers’ group the Transvaal Agricultural Union, Louis Meintjes, warned the country risks going down the same route as Zimbabwe, which plunged into famine after a government-sanctioned purge of white farmers in the 2000s.

“Where in the world has expropriation without compensation coupled to the waste of agricultural land, resulted in foreign confidence, economic growth and increased food production?” Meintjes said, as cited by Australia’s news.com.au.

“If Mr Ramaphosa is set on creating an untenable situation, he should actively create circumstances which will promote famine. His promise to expropriate land without compensation sows the seed for revolution. Expropriation without compensation is theft.”

The most sensible thing said yet. Shame that nobody is going to listen to him of course.

Pay close attention to what is going on in South Africa. I can guarantee that once things do go to hell, when civil unrest kicks off, when massacres start happening, when people start starving, etc., that the media narrative is going to place the blame solely on the white people. But we know this isn’t the case. We need to be aware of what has actually happened. Because don’t think that something similar won’t happen in Europe, North America, Australia, etc., someday. The whole “we’re taking back our stolen land” narrative, is just an excuse to justify what is happening, to the international community. It’s not about justice. It’s about stealing resources from a group they despise and envy. But once the demographics shift in all other countries, there won’t be any international community to justify their actions to. They’ll be free to the same to us, without having to hide behind any excuses.

South Africa rapidly heading the direction of Zimbabwe.

1948-1989-170-murders-eacn-year-south-africa-back-when-2785512

There’s not a single successful black run nation on the planet. Don’t take my word for it. Take it from the good people over at foreignpolicy.com.

1
Their words, not mine… though I do agree.

All kinds of excuses are made for this fact. There’s the lingering impact of colonialism for example. However, if that was the case, then why is it that Ireland, which was colonised for far longer than any black run nation, is far more successful than Ethiopia and Liberia, two black run nations which were never colonised?

There’s the excuse that their natural resources were stolen from them. But if that was the case, then why is it that Japan, a country with virtually no natural resources, is so successful?

There’s geographic location and the associated environmental factors. But if that was the case, why is the Dominican Republic doing so much better than Haiti, when they share the same island? And why was Rhodesia under white rule so successful, but Zimbabwe under black rule so unsuccessful, when it’s the same country in the same location?

HaitiDominicanRepublicBorder-1024x717
Haiti, left. Dominican Republic, right. Notice the difference?

Then of course there’s the good old fashioned “racism” excuse, were some kind of invisible, unquantifiable force, is somehow preventing them from succeeding, even in countries were they make up the demographic majority.

1360696276687
Racism hurt their feelings so much, that it caused them to turn their country into a dump. This is the fault of white people who live in different countries.

All these excuses are complete and utter crap. While no single factor can be given sole credit for a country’s success, or lack thereof, there is one factor above all others, which the evidence suggests has the biggest impact of all. That factor, is the racial demographic of the people who inhabit, and are responsible for running that country, and the evidence also suggests that not all demographics are equal. When looking at historical precedent and every example of when it has been tried so far, one thing is abundantly clear. As a whole, black people are seemingly incapable of creating (or even maintaining one that is already created) a functioning, first world society.

I’ve discussed the South African topic on a couple of occasions already. Check out here, here, and here, to read some of my previous posts. However, I had to go back to the topic again, after watching the latest “Black Pigeon Speaks” video on what is going on there.

If I wasn’t already so experienced with dealing with topics like this, I think I would actually be dumbfounded by what is going on. But I’m not inexperienced at all, so none of this surprises me. I’m not surprised that after handing over control of the country to the black majority, that South Africa is rapidly heading in the same direction that Rhodesia did when the same happened there. I’m not surprised that the black majority are persecuting the white minority, without having the longterm foresight to realise that they depend on this white minority to create any prosperity in the country at all . I’m not surprised that there is so much corruption. I’m not surprised that there is so many murders and rapes. I’m not surprised that there is such huge increase in HIV/AIDS. I’m not surprised that pretty soon, the once first world city of Cape Town, won’t even be able to keep the water running. And most importantly of all, I’m not surprised that the virtue signalling governments of the Western world and the tightly controlled mainstream media, aren’t lifting a finger to help the persecuted whites, all while they bend over backwards to advocate for the millions of Arabs and Blacks who are illegally flooding into Europe.

None of this, none of this at all surprises me. And do you know why it doesn’t surprise me? Because this is exactly what was supposed to happen by design. Ending apartheid was never about empowering the black South African majority, in the same way that mass immigration from the third world to Europe, was never about helping people from the third world, or how affirmative action and diversity quotas was never about helping minorities ( in South Africa they give affirmative action to blacks despite blacks being the majority btw). These policies have always had one primary goal in mind. Causing harm to white people.

The situation in South Africa is a warning to us all (a warning that we should have already taken on board from the situation in Zimbabwe). This is the inevitable future in all white majority countries, if we ever become powerless minorities. Don’t think for a second that the laws and values that we create, will protect us in the future. We will be at their mercy.

And I get the distinct impression, that they don’t know the meaning of the word.

The worst form of inequality…

quote-the-worst-form-of-inequality-is-to-try-to-make-unequal-things-equal-aristotle-6833
“What do you mean when you say that the work of a cashier and a warehouse worker aren’t equal? They both do the same amount of hours, damn it.”

Guys, you’re not going to believe this. Apparently Tesco think that it’s OK to pay women less than men for doing the same work. I just can’t get over this. I am feeling seriously triggered right now that such blatant sexism has been going on for so long. Thankfully, some brave, heroic women, have taken a stand for their rights and are taking legal action against this sexist behemoth. Lets read on to learn more about what these women have had to deal with.

From RTE

Tesco is facing Britain’s largest ever equal pay claim and a possible compensation bill of up to £4 billion, according to a law firm which has begun legal proceedings. 

Tesco is Britain’s biggest retailer and its largest private sector employer with a staff of over 310,000. 

Wow I can’t believe this. Didn’t Tesco get the memo? It’s illegal to pay women less than men for doing the same work. How is it that they think they can get away with paying women less than men for doing the same work, in *current year*. It’s just disgraceful really that a company as large as Tesco, could possibly think it’s acceptable to pay women less than men, for doing the same work.

they-say-a-womans-work-is-never-done1
Your typical Tesco executive.

Law firm Leigh Day said that thousands of Tesco employees working in its predominantly male-dominated distribution centres are paid considerably more than the largely female-staffed Tesco stores. 

.

.

.

“Distribution centers.

Tesco DC

.

.

.

“Stores”

23EA067400000578-3246958-image-a-25_1443052266710

In distribution centers, workers have to lift very heavy boxes and operate potentially dangerous machinery such as forklift trucks. In stores, people have to put stuff on shelves, and sit at a till scanning stuff. Call me sexist or whatever, but that doesn’t sound like doing the same work, to me.

It said distribution centre staff may earn in excess of £11 an hour whilst the most common grade for store staff sees them receive around £8 an hour. 

Maybe because the work in the distribution centers is more physically demanding and also potentially more dangerous. As a result, distribution center staff are in a position to demand better remuneration than store staff. Also, the store staff does include men, and I’m sure the distribution centers do include women (albeit a much smaller amount), so wouldn’t those men in stores also receive £8 an hour, and the women in distribution centers, also receive £11 an hour? In other words, it has nothing to do with their gender. Rather, it’s purely down to the role which they perform. If the women who work in the stores are so unhappy with the “sexism” of getting paid less than the men who work in the distribution centers, then the solution is obvious. They should apply for jobs in the distribution centers and take part in the heavy lifting and use of dangerous equipment, alongside those privileged men.

511719050
Follow this lady’s example.

This disparity could see a full time distribution worker on the same hours earning over £100 a week, or £5,000 a year, more than female based store staff

Oh but the male store staff aren’t also earning £100 less a week than the distribution staff. No, this only effects the female staff apparently.

Leigh Day said it has already started submitting claims on behalf of its clients. 

It said the underpayment could apply to in excess of 200,000 Tesco employees and with estimated pay shortfalls that could reach £20,000 the final bill for Tesco could be as high as £4 billion.

I don’t even like Tesco, but in this case, I sincerely hope they win this one. This is such a stupid claim that I really think its stupidity is completely self evident. These stupid bitches don’t seem to understand that working an equal number of hours, is not the same thing as providing “equal value” in terms of the work that they do. It would be one thing if male cashiers were getting paid more than female cashiers. If that was the case, I could completely understand their argument, because that would be a clear cut case of one group getting paid less for doing the same work. But these are two entirely different jobs, so there’s no justification for demanding the same amount of money. If something like this is actually allowed to go forward, where will it end?

Scrubs_dvd20.png
“I should be getting paid the same amount of money as the doctors. We all work in the hospital so it’s not fair that janitors are paid less than them.”