In my last post from just a few short hours ago, I briefly gave an overview on the three big attacks that took place in Europe earlier today (or I guess technically speaking, ‘yesterday’ now). At the time of writing, for two of the attacks (Berlin and Zurich) it was unconfirmed who was responsible. Well, we’ve just got confirmation on the Berlin attack.
So apparently, in at least one of the two cases which were at the time unconfirmed, we now know that yes, it was yet another Muslim responsible, one who came into the country claiming to be a refugee, and one who has no legitimate claim to refugee status anyway.
I would say that the situation is getting completely absurd at this point but in all honesty, it was absurd right from the beginning. Plenty of people have warned right from the beginning that this sort of thing would happen, and we were sneered at and insulted as “racists”, or “Islamophobes”, or “Xenophobes”, or whatever other childish insult our detractors could come up with at the time. Yet time and time again, we’re being proven correct in our predictions.
We don’t have a problem with Europe’s migrant policies because we’re evil hate filled monsters with an irrational hatred towards the skin colour or geographical origins of these people. Those things are irrelevant. We have a problem with these migrant policies because we love our nations, we love our culture, we care about our own people, and we recognise exactly what is happening to us. A hostile and destructive enemy force has declared war, and is attempting to exterminate and conquer us, and many of our own people, including the national leaders who we’ve elected to represent our interests, are more concerned with not hurting the feelings of an enemy that hates us and wants us dead anyway, than protecting us from this enemy.
Go on, try and defend this ongoing insanity. I’d love to hear what kind of desperate excuses will be trotted out next. I’m guessing at some point the establishment will claim that Russia made this “Peaceful Pakistani refugee” do it somehow. If you’re an ordinary person who has been in favour of this suicidal migrant settlement programme, despite how many times it has been proven a disaster for us, I hope you’re finally willing to reevaluate things and consider the fact that maybe you were wrong to support it.
If not, then as far as I’m concerned, you’re a traitor who is guilty of supporting this ongoing extermination and subjucation of your own people.
In the Islamic terrorist hotspot known as France, a would be terrorist attack on Disneyland Paris was thankfully foiled. I’m glad to know that nobody was hurt this time, but it is disturbing to know that these frequent attacks show no sign of stopping any time soon. They may have prevented a tragedy this time, but next time, they might not be so lucky.
Seven men arrested on suspicion of being part of a terrorist cell in France last weekend were likely planning an attack on Disneyland Paris and the Champs Elysees Christmas market, according to the latest reports.
The suspects, who were French,
What is the deal with all these “French Men” going around randomly trying to shoot, behead, and blow people up in France, the last few years? What has changed about France so much that suddenly lots of “French Men” are committing these horrible acts? We never used to see so many cases of “French Men” committing acts of terrorism, but by some strange coincidence, it seems to be happening a lot more ever since France allowed people from certain other parts of the world, in which terrorist attacks are quite common, to settle in France. However, these two incidents couldn’t possibly be linked in anyway, because the magical French air and soil alters the personalities and value systems of people to be more like those of the French people. At least, that’s what the media and our political elites have led me to believe and we know they would never lie to us.
Moroccan and Afghan were detained in Strasbourg and Marseille following Saturday night’s raids.
Those poor innocent Moroccans and Afghans. First, they manage to escape the brutal Syrian civil war which has spread to Morocco and Afghanistan, then when they finally arrive safely in France, they get tricked by evil “French Men”, into joining a terrorist cell against their better judgment. If only those “French Men” hadn’t tricked them into doing terrorism, they would have have used their wonderful skills and education to make France better somehow.
The operation marked the end of an eight-month monitoring operation by counter-terrorism police. Two of the men have since been released.
They probably got a stern talking to, realise now that terrorism is a naughty thing to do, and can be trusted not to try and murder anybody else in the future.
According to sources, the men had considered targeting a number of different sites, including Disneyland and the Champs Elysees, the Paris criminal police headquarters and a metro station.
The evil bastards probably chose Disneyland instead because there was more likely to be kids there to kill. If you’re going to commit a brutal act of terrorism, you may as well make it as heinous and despicable as possible, to really hurt and demoralise the country you’re targeting.
While Disneyland Paris have not released an official statement on the matter, a spokesperson for the amusement park told The Associated Press that the safety and security of guests is “our No. 1 priority. We work closely with state and local authorities, and constantly review the security measures we have in place.”
And yet nobody will take the most obvious step to guarantee security and safety. Putting a stop to immigration from countries with values incompatible with those of France, and mass deportations of people already in France who have set up ghettos and failed to integrate. What is the actual benefit to France and the French people having these people in their country? No emotional bullshit about “doing the right thing” or preaching some kind of vague morality. Purely in practical terms, what is the point? What are the benefits, if any, and how do these benefits outweigh the problems that these people bring? That’s the question that needs to be answered.
France remains under a state of emergency, which allows French security forces special powers of surveillance, search and arrest in times of acute crisis.
“Hey look, sorry you have to live under an Orwellian surveillance state. Unfortunately, because so many “French Men” turned into terrorists, around the same time we became a multicultural society without giving you the option to vote on it, we now have to live under these conditions, in order to keep you safe. There’s no other possible solution, and anyone who suggests there are alternatives (such as changing our immigration policy), is just a hate-filled Neo-Nazi, who shouldn’t be listened to.”
Earlier this week, the The US State Department warned Americans who were planning to travel over the festive period to “exercise vigilance” in tourist areas due to the “heightened risk of terrorist attacks throughout Europe”.
LOL, wow. You know things are bad when a country with as many murders as America is warning its citizens that Europe could be dangerous to visit. It really puts things in perspective.
So guys, you’re not going to believe this, but there’s been yet another attack in Germany, by yet another member of the Religion of Peace. This is so confusing for so many reasons, not least of which is the fact that these Muslim attackers don’t seem to understand that their religion is a peaceful one. You would think they would understand their own religion better than us Westerners who don’t follow it, but for some reason, we understand it better than they do. We know it’s a peaceful religion despite not being raised in it, studying it closely, or ever actually living under it. Our political leaders and media keep telling us so and that must be true because they would never dream of lying to us. Yet these people who have been raised within and taught Islam their whole lives have a worse understanding of it than we do, and keep committing violence in the name of a peaceful religion.
A couple at a German music festival have been attacked by a knifeman who witnesses claim was heard shouting “Allahu Akbar”.
A 66-year-old woman, believed to be the other victim’s wife, is said to be fighting for her life.
The other victim – a 57-year-old man – is seriously injured however he still managed to overpower the man who was then arrested by police officers in Oberhausen.
Damn, Germany should really consider bringing in knife control laws. The problem isn’t that they’re importing violent savages who are incompatible with the Western way of life. It’s the fact that knife control laws are so relaxed in Germany. Anybody can access a knife so easily and just go on a killing spree straight after.
It isn’t their fault of course. The knife makes them do it. If only we didn’t have nasty organisations like the NKA (National Knives Association) defending their constitutional rights to knife ownership. Even though the vast majority of knife owners are responsible and decent citizens, we must strip all citizens of their right to knife ownership, in order to prevent future attacks such as these from happening.
All jokes aside, I wouldn’t consider myself a gun nut, or even a fan of them for that matter. However, I do think it’s ridiculous how whenever there is a mass shooting in America, the first thing people do is scream about gun control, rather than addressing the real issues. America has always had the same gun laws as they have right now, but it’s only really in the last few decades that gun violence has become such an epidemic in the country. Therefore, there is obviously something (or things) that have changed in the past few decades that have caused this increase in gun violence. People should instead be trying to figure out what those changes are (I have a few theories myself of course), instead of focusing on the gun ownership issue. Even if guns were controlled, the violent types, such as this guy in Germany will just find other ways to commit their attacks instead. Besides, the gun control laws that exist in France didn’t stop the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo or Paris from getting their hands on guns. It might stop the random lunatic from getting his hands on a gun, but it won’t make a difference for more organised and more highly motivated attackers like Jihadists.
The attack took place just after 7pm on Saturday evening.
Police officers say the suspect is a 26-year-old from Duisburg, Germany.
Sure… he’s from Germany. A typical German man, who goes around screaming “Allahu Akbar”, while stabbing random passers by in the street. I guess Germany is starting to go down the same path as Sweden, were everybody who happens to be within their borders is considered one of their own, even if they aren’t of the Germanic ethnicity, or part of German culture.
In a statement, police said the suspect was “apparently under the influence of narcotics”.
Oh, so it must have been the drugs fault. We can’t blame his ideological views for driving him to commit this attack. The drugs are to blame.
Officers say they have also recovered a weapon from the scene.
German media reported that the suspect is homeless.
“They’ll pay your pensions. We need to import infinity people from the third world to Europe, because these people will use their superior intellect, creativity, and work ethic (as evident by how successful the third world countries they all came from are), to create enormous wealth and prosperity in our countries. They’ll be working jobs that you Europeans are too uneducated and lazy to do.”
This man was clearly yet another example of the successful people that Germany needs more of, in order to better itself -_-
The phrase “Allahu Akbar” means “God is Great” and has been chanted by Islamic terrorists during attacks.
Strange how they always seem to do that. Why would a peaceful God, want his peaceful followers of his peaceful religion, to commit acts of great violence in his honour?
However officers are yet to confirm a motive for the attack.
The police are baffled as to why a man shouting “Allahu Akbar” would go around stabbing random people in the streets. What possible motive could he have for this? I think I know what they’re going to come up with. I’m guessing they’ll figure he doesn’t have a motive, and is just the latest in the long line of victims of the “Great mental health epidemic of 2016” which seems to disproportionately affect Muslims for some reason. There was actually another random knife attack recently (in Belgium), in which the police concluded that the attacker (a woman whose ethnic and religious background has not yet been released), had mental health problems which is what caused her to attack. Perhaps it’s the same with this German case as well.
Anyway, I’ll leave it at that. The rest of the article (link at the top as always) just discusses other recent attacks that have happened, and isn’t particularly relevant to the rest of the story.
Guys, you’re not going to believe this, but there’s been an attack… by Muslims… in France… yet again. This is truly baffling because Islam is the religion of peace, so it makes absolutely no sense that so many of these attacks by Muslims keep on happening. I’ve decided to link to the French version of “The Local” as my source for this story. Rather than going through the entire article piece by piece, I’ll just copy and paste the summary at the top of the page. Link to the full story will as always be provided if you wish to read the whole thing.
UPDATED: Two men armed with knives killed a priest after taking several people hostage at a French church, before they were shot dead by police.
Two knifemen claiming to be from Islamic state took several hostages during mass
They killed the 84-year-old priest Jacques Hamel by slitting his throat
Three churchgoers were also injured, one of them seriously
The attackers were shot dead by police
President François Hollande described it as a “vile terrorist attack”
Counter terror judges have been called in to investigate
Isis then claimed responsibility for the attack
So how are all the “Refugees welcome”, “Islam is a peaceful religion” and “Trump is the real danger because he wants to temporarily ban Muslim immigration”types, going to explain this one, alongside every other attack that has happened? I’m guessing they won’t even bother trying. They’ll just double down in their delusions rather than admit that they have been wrong.
It’s only going to get worse and worse. And the worse it gets, the worse the backlash is going to be when the ordinary people are finally woken up in significant enough numbers to stand up and say “NO MORE!!!”
So there was a yet another terrorist attack on European soil in the last 24 hours. Germany was the victim once again. There was very little information about the attacker for a long time, and it was even suspected for a while that it might have been a group of three shooters working together, although this was later found to be inaccurate, and there was only one. Rumours quickly circulated that the gunman had used “anti-foreigner slurs” and so the biased mainstream media leapt on this and wasted absolutely no time in trying to blame “Neo-Nazis” or “Right wing Extremists” for the attack.
And there were plenty of others as well. When I was reading articles earlier trying to find out information about this attack, most sites brought up the “anti-foreigner” description of the attacker, but have since updated their articles to reflect what we now know. The shooter wasn’t a Neo-Nazi after all. He was apparently an 18 year old dual German-Iranian citizen.
And there are plenty of other news sources confirming the same thing. Now I’m guessing that seeing as the “far right extremist” narrative has collapsed, the media will try and present a new narrative as they continue to desperately try to lead us away from recognising the obvious truth facing us. They’ll try and play down how religious this guy was, all while trying to find some other motivation for why he did it, such as stress, or racial discrimination he suffered, or something, anything that doesn’t blame his religious background.
Don’t fall for it when they do. And don’t be surprised when they try the same tactic when the next attack inevitably occurs.
It’s just incredible really. The last post I made just a few days ago, was to express my anger towards the recent major terrorist attack in Nice. Yet here we are, less than a week later and there have been several smaller (but by no means less despicable) attacks that have taken place. I honestly can’t keep up. This blog is not my life. I do have other things going on that take up much of my energy and free time, but at the same time, I do like to try and keep track of as much important news stories as I can. Normally, when there’s a new terrorist attack in the news, I like to dedicate a post to it, but that’s seriously starting to become unfeasible at this point, unless I decide to give up everything else in my life and just chain myself to my computer permanently. As a compromise, I’m going to address multiple recent attacks all at once. I don’t think it really matters seeing as they’re all ultimately part of the same ongoing war between Western Civilisation and Islam.
The first one that comes to mind was the one in Germany committed by a 17 year old “Asylum seeker” from Afghanistan (he was just trying to escape from the brutal civil war in Afghanistan -_-). CNN was one of many outlets that wrote an article about the attack. I won’t bother linking to the entire text and dissecting piece by piece like I normally do. Instead I’ll just take one extract in particular that stood out to me.
Herrmann said that a hand-drawn flag resembling the one used by ISIS was found in the attacker’s room, and said that he shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the attack, according to initial distress calls.
He acted by himself, Herrmann said.
Though a pro-ISIS media group said the attacker was a “ISIS fighter,” authorities cast doubt on that claim and it’s believed to be unlikely that he was working under the direct supervision of the terror group.
The 17-year-old was taken in two weeks ago by a foster family, Herrmann said.
“This is a big mosaic puzzle right now and we will do everything to pull information together in order to assess his motivation,” he said.
This level of skepticism is absolutely unbelievable. But this is what they always seem to do. Every single time a Muslim goes on a rampage in the West, they always have to act as if they haven’t a clue as to why they did this. It’s just a “random attack” possibly motivated by “anger in the workplace”, which could have just as easily been committed by an indigenous European person instead. This is despite the fact that they are always completely honest with us and make it clear as to why they did it, what their actual motivation is.
Meanwhile other outlets such as The Independent and The BBC are contradicting this ridiculous “We have no idea what his motive was” narrative with articles which state that ISIS even released a video allegedly of the attacker swearing allegiance to them and promising to attack their enemies. So how can any news media act as if they have no idea what his motive was when it’s so obvious to anyone with even a shred of common sense and ability to recognise behavioural patterns?
But moving on swiftly, there was another attack that happened in France recently, one that didn’t get as much attention as the Nice attack as it was a lot smaller. In this case, as the Daily Mail reports, a mother and her three daughters were on holiday in the South of France and were stabbed by a Muslim man. His reason for doing so? Because they were wearing shorts and t-shirts and he was offended by how scantily dressed they were.
And while this is happening, we have my old favourite, The Guardian, coming out with this gem.
French authorities have detained a Moroccan man after he stabbed a woman and her three daughters, briefly causing panic in a nation reeling from its third major attack in 18 months.
The motive for the attack was not immediately clear.
The woman, 46, and her girls, aged eight, 12 and 14, were staying at a holiday village near the town of Laragne-Montéglin, in the Hautes-Alpes region. The suspect, 37, from the Paris region, was staying with his wife and children at the same resort.
Jean-Marc Duprat, a deputy mayor for the nearby town, initially said the attacker was upset with his victims because they were wearing shorts and T-shirts. He later said that did not appear to be the case and that the attacker’s motive was not known.
Raphaël Balland, a public prosecutor, said the motive for the attack was “very hazy”. Balland said the idea that the assailant could have been upset over what his victims were wearing was merely a “rumour” and that he had “not uttered any words reproaching them for their dress at the moment of the attack”.
Again, we have an attempt to hide what is obvious to anyone who is willing to open their eyes. Even if he hadn’t outright said that he attacked them for how they were dressed, it should be clear from looking at his background, and how women are expected to dress in his culture. Morocco is an Arab country, with Sunni-Islam being the official state religion. It should be completely fucking obvious what his motive was.
The third and final attack which I want to mention also happened in France. Details are a little sketchy at the moment. I can neither confirm nor deny whether the perpetrator is a Muslim. However in situations like this, I usually find that this piece of wisdom holds true.
So what happened this time was that a man took hostages in a French hotel. He was armed with a knife and explosives (which just makes me all the more suspicious that it’s a Muslim), according to The Sun. He has since been arrested, but again, no details about who he is. The reality of our situation right now, is that the media doesn’t exist to keep us informed of what’s going on. Its purpose is to manipulate and control us by controlling the flow of information and setting the narrative that is be followed. We can see this by how they selectively cover certain things up as best as possible, blow other narratives out of proportion, and try to play dumb when faced with inconvenient truths.
Again let me point out, that I’m not saying for sure that this guy definitely was a Muslim. He could very easily have been a native white French guy, but the fact that this hasn’t been reported is making me believe that this isn’t the case. With all the bad publicity surrounding Muslim immigration right now, a case where the attacker isn’t a Muslim would be perfect to promote the media’s agenda that native Europeans can be just as deadly, so they would definitely exploit it if that was the case. We’ll just have to wait and see, but I’m pretty confident that I’ll be right on the money when the truth comes out… that is unless of course the story is flushed down the memory hole before that has a chance to happen.
I’m very angry today. I thought I would have cooled off by now after having a chance to sleep things off. Instead, it has only gotten worse. How much more of this are we going to take? How many more innocent people have to die before we say enough is enough? Islam just is not compatible with European values, which means we need to put European values first and foremost.
As usual, the media is claiming to be “shocked” by what has happened.
But how can anybody really be shocked at this? This is nothing unusual anymore. These attacks keep on happening. In fact, they happen so damn often that the last post I made was about how there is a worry that another terrorist attack could bring France to the point of civil war. They obviously wouldn’t be worried about terrorist attacks, unless they felt there was a chance that more of them could happen.
On social media the response is even more nauseating. I expect the mainstream media and the political classes to desperately lie or perform mental gymnastics in order to comprehend this situation, because they have to cover their own asses. They’ve been the ones promoting this insanity the entire time, and they’re in too deep to back off now, but the reaction from ordinary people who have no reason to be invested in these lies is infuriating.
It’s the usual nonsense such as (and I’m paraphrasing here):
“I don’t understand why this is happening. Why can’t we all just live in peace seeing as we’re all just human beings?”
“We can’t allow incidents like this to divide us. We can’t allow fear or hatred to take root. We need to become more united.”
“This isn’t real Islam. Islam is a religion of peace”.
“As bad as these attacks are, we need to consider how lucky we really are. This sort of thing happens in the Middle East and North Africa every day”
(LOL, I wonder why that is).
There was however one reasonable post that I saw on Facebook.
I haven’t seen anybody break out the French flag profile picture filter yet, though I really wouldn’t be surprised if some people already have.
All this virtue signalling is getting us nowhere. Nobody is willing to speak out and ask the questions that need to be asked. Why are we allowing our countries to be overrun by a hostile and alien culture that wishes to destroy us? What are the benefits of allowing millions of Muslims who aren’t compatible with our way of life, to live among us? What is the point? Assuming any benefits exist (which I doubt), do they outweigh the negative consequences of having them here such as constant terrorism, an increase in rapes, and an erosion of our way of life?
If anyone can honestly answer the above questions in such a way that justifies what is happening, then so be it, I’ll come around. I’m quite open to having my mind changed in the face of new evidence. But honestly, I don’t think it’s possible. I really cannot think of a single benefit (even in theory, much less based in reality) that outweighs all the trouble we’re experiencing. And seeing as there are no benefits to us for doing this, then why should we continue with it? We shouldn’t have to destroy ourselves and the countries which were handed down to us by our own ancestors, all for the benefit of a group which despises us. The whole multicultural experiment has clearly failed, and it’s time we stopped putting our own well-being behind those of our enemies. We need to start looking at other options.
So some interesting news from France.While everybody is distracted by the stupid racist cop hoax in America, there are things that actually matter happening right now. Now admittedly when looking at the title of the article, and actually reading the content, it seems to be scaremongering a little. Nevertheless, it deserves some attention.
The internal terrorist threat in France is so urgent that the commander of the French security services has twice warned the French Parliament about the possibility of new terrorist attacks could trigger a civil war.
There wouldn’t be a possibility of new terrorists attacks if potential terrorists weren’t in France to begin with. Seeing as it isn’t the indigenous white French people who are committing acts of terrorism, then the problem is easy to solve. Stop importing people who come from terrorism hotspots, and deport any of those already in the country who haven’t bothered to assimilate. The people living in unassimilated ghettos are of no benefit to French society and you don’t owe them anything. Get rid of them before it’s too late. Any non-natives who have made the effort to integrate can stay, but any who haven’t, should be removed. It’s really that simple. It just takes a bit of willpower to implement.
The chief of security, Patrick Calvar, is considered one of those in France with the best insight into the inner threat situation in the country, writes Le Figaro.
“WHAT WOULD HE KNOW?!?!?”
“HE’S PROBABLY JUST AN EVIL HATE FILLED ISLAMOPHOBE WHO HATES THEM FOR THEIR SKIN COLOUR AND JUST PRETENDS TO BE KNOW WHAT HE’S TALKING ABOUT!!!!”
In connection with the violent terrorist attack on Friday 13 November last year, which led to the French government appointed a commission of inquiry, he stated behind closed doors in parliament this year that France “stands on the brink of civil war.” He has also warned the Parliament’s defense committee that if there are more terrorist attacks from Islamic ranks, the far right could exploit the situation to trigger a civil war.
So if Muslim terrorists launch attacks against the native white French people, and the so called “far right” retaliates… the far right are to blame? Excellent logic there.
After the terrorist attack on November 13 last year, France introduced a state of emergency. The state of emergency persists to this day, and could earliest cease after the European Football Championships and Tour de France. However, it will probably persist longer than this summer, as long as there are no signs of the terrorist threat increasing. On the contrary.
“Sorry French people, but because all these Muslim terrorists we imported without giving you a vote on the matter keep killing you, we’ll have to take away your freedoms in order to protect you, instead of just removing the actual problem.”
Calvar also points out that mass assaults against women like the one we saw in Cologne on New Year’s Eve, could likely trigger civil war like conditions.
And I guess that would be the “far right’s” fault too if that happens. Sure what are you worried about? There’s absolutely no possibility that another mass sexual assault like that could happen again. It was just an isolated incident. Even if it does, it could just as easily be native white French men who do it, seeing as the problem is with men in general, so you wouldn’t need to worry about a civil war happening then.
Just the female perspective may be crucial in the development of Western Europe. There are limits to how long the native population silently and without action allows mothers, wives and daughters to be victims of sexual abuse in public, in what was once the world’s best continent for women.
And yet if you were to listen to a lot of third wave feminists, you would think Europe was Saudi Arabia. Hopefully they might appreciate just how progressive and liberal Europe is when it comes to women’s rights and safety after getting a preview of the alternative.
Calvar also points to a growing Islamic extremism in the suburbs of large cities, so-called banlieus.
But of course nothing will be done about it. And then when there’s an attack there will be the usual “shock” and statements of “nobody saw it coming” and people will change their Facebook profile picture to the French flag for a few days, forget all about it, until the next attack and the cycle happens all over again.
Al-Qaeda has praised Orlando gunman Omar Mateen but criticised him for targeting gays, saying lone wolf jihadists should attack white Americans and avoid minorities so that no one mistakes their terror assaults for hate crimes.
This just confirms that specifically targeting white people for murder isn’t considered a hate crime. If a person specifically targeted blacks, Hispanics, Arabs, Jews etc because of their race, it would be considered a hate crime. White people’s lives however, aren’t as important, so it’s just a normal crime when they’re the ones who are specifically targeted.
In an article in the latest edition of its online magazine Inspire, Al-Qaeda of the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), called for more “self-directed” Muslim terrorists to kill in America. In the article, titled Inspire guide: Orlando operation, the terror group tells terrorists to “avoid targeting places and crowds where minorities are generally found” because if gays or Latinos appear to be the targets, “the federal government will be the one taking full responsibility.”
They don’t want anyone else getting the credit for their attacks. Omar Mateen made a point of ringing 911 and pledging allegience to ISIS before making his attack, but the SJW establishment didn’t want the attack to be linked to Islamic terrorism, so they tried to present it as a simple homophobic attack instead. The terrorists don’t like this. They want credit for their attacks. The problem however, is that SJWs don’t want Islam to get a bad reputation, so they’ll do everything in their power to place the blame anywhere else.
The online magazine praises the Orlando attack but instructs terrorists to target “Anglo-Saxons”, Fox News reported. In the 12 June attack in Orlando, Omar Mateen massacred 49 people and injured 53 inside a gay nightclub in Orlando.
Although Mateen, who was later killed by police, told hostage negotiators he pledged allegiance to ISIS, US Attorney General Loretta Lynch has characterised the attack as a hate crime against gays.
Yes it was just a simple hate crime against gay people, the kind that happen every single day. It could just as easily have been a Christian bigot who killed them. Sure, these Christian bigots haven’t actually moved beyond refusing to bake gay wedding cakes, or picketing gay funerals with “God Hates Fags” signs, but clearly Christianity is just as dangerous towards gay people as the religion whose followers regularly throw gay people off of roofs, or hang them from cranes, in countries they are they majority in. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam specifically. It’s just general homophobia.
“I cannot tell you definitively that we will ever narrow it down to one motivation,” Lynch told reporters last week. “People often act out of more than one motivation. This was clearly an act of terror and an act of hate,” she had said.
Well at least she was willing to admit the terror part. Unlike the teleprompter reader in chief who refuses to acknowledge the link between Islam and terrorism.
Although Al-Qaeda does not take credit for Mateen’s attack in the online article, it urges more “lone wolves” to take up arms. Jihadists should target “areas where the Anglo-Saxon community is generally concentrated,” it states.
“This class of the American community is the majority and it is the one that is in the American leadership,” it says. Al Qaeda is “very carefully threading a needle” by endorsing the attack while criticising Mateen’s target selection, said Ryan Mauro, national security analyst for Clarion Project, a Washington-based nonprofit that tracks the international terror threat.
“This is Al Qaeda’s way of asserting itself above ISIS in the wake of its competitor’s success,” Mauro was quoted as saying. Inspire magazine often exploits terror attacks in the West and makes threats against Europe and the United States. While the terror group responsible for 9/11 has been overshadowed by rival ISIS in recent years, it praised Mateen for his monstrous act.
I don’t think there’s anything more that needs to be said. It all speaks for itself really. One of the worst terrorist organisations in the world is literally encouraging lone wolf terrorists to specifically target white people because they know our lives matter less and that an attack on us won’t be twisted to fit a hate crime narrative.
Omar S. Mateen, who killed 50 people at a gay nightclub in Orlando last night, had already been “on the radar” of US officials, and reportedly pledged allegiance to ISIL, a.k.a. the Islamic State, in a 911 call just before the attack.
They obviously weren’t watching him closely enough. You would think that a guy who is a known ISIS supporter would be monitored much more closely than he obviously was. Well actually, you would think he would be recognised for exactly what he is… an enemy of the country he was in, and would therefore not even be allowed to stay in the country at all. I guess that’s because I keep making the mistake of thinking more along the lines of saner times when Western countries weren’t trying to commit collective suicide.
Mateen had twice been identified as a “person of interest to authorities,” a senior law enforcement source told The Daily Beast. He came to the FBI’s attention in 2013 and again in 2014, though the source didn’t specify why. The FBI opened an investigation into Mateen but couldn’t find anything requiring further work, and so closed the case, according to The Daily Beast source. In a conflicting account, law enforcement officials told ABC News that Mateen was “on the radar” of officials, but not subject to a specific investigation.
I guess the radar wasn’t working too well then.
Before carrying out the attack, Mateen called 911 in Florida and swore his allegiance to the head of the Islamic State, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, according to NBC News, which cited law-enforcement sources. A US congressman, Adam Schiff, told CNN he had been given the same information by intelligence officials.
Mateen was born in New York in 1986 to Afghan parents and was once married to a woman from New Jersey. His former wife told The Washington Post that Mateen was violent, mentally unstable, and often beat her. “He would just come home and start beating me up because the laundry wasn’t finished or something like that,” she said. The couple were married in March 2009 and formally divorced in 2011.
Again, this is just yet another example of how even many of the ones who are born and raised in Western countries don’t integrate. It isn’t just simply a short term problem of new arrivals to the West, with some of them taking time to adjust. This man was born in America and for all intents and purposes, would have been considered just another American citizen. Yet despite growing up there, his allegiance was elsewhere because Islam is simply incompatible with Western culture.
The 29-year-old worked as a professional security officer, and had a gun license to carry a firearm. He lived in Port St. Lucie, Florida, a two-hour drive from Orlando, and rented a car to drive there and carry out the attack.
Just watch as they try and blame “the gun” for what happened. Truth be told back in the day, I would have been the same myself until I really started thinking about things. Switzerland is a country with a very strong gun culture and high gun ownership, but has hardly any deaths by firearm is comparison. I think there has to be other variables to take into consideration for why America’s gun violence is so bad. I get the fact that laws relating to gun ownership are a contributing factor, but I don’t think it’s right to focus on one element, while ignoring others, just because it’s politically incorrect to look at them.
Aside from the report about Mateen’s ISIL ties, the exact motives behind his attack remain unclear,
A radical Muslim who supports ISIS? Hmm, I wonder what possible motivation he could have for attacking a nightclub full of gay people?
and it is also unclear whether he collaborated with anyone. So far, the authorities have not released any answers. Florida Democrat senator Bill Nelson has said information from intelligence sources suggest “a link to Islamic radicalism… some kind of connection to ISIS,” a.k.a ISIL. However, Florida congressman Alan Grayson said there was currently no evidence that Mateen had outside help.
He was probably just mentally ill, and was driven to kill these people because of all the racism he experienced from evil white Americans. He’s the real victim here, not all those people he killed. The real guilty party is every single white person in America who oppressed him with their white privilege. We should probably just bring in millions of more people from the Middle East to America, to overrun those racist white supremacists, so that they won’t be able to oppress people like Omar in vague, unspecified ways anymore.
Am I doing it right mainstream media?
One possibility is that Mateen was a lone wolf inspired by radical Islam but not working directly with any terrorist groups.
Which again is even worse. They don’t even need to be part of a terrorist organisation. They can just go out and commit terrorism by themselves. I wonder how many more “lone wolves” like this guy are currently in America and Europe just biding their time until they’re ready to act? It is utter insanity that we have allowed this to happen. What was the point in allowing millions of people with cultural beliefs entirely incompatible with our own, to come in to our countries without forcing them to integrate?
As I’ve tried to explain time and time again, borders exist for a reason. It’s not that European people just happened to find land with magical first world generating air and soil and set up borders at the points were this air and soil stopped. It’s not as if they wanted to keep out non-white people simply because they’re evil racists who didn’t want to share this first world air and soil with them, due to a hatred towards the colour of their skin.
Different people have different cultures, and different cultures result in different types of societies. Some cultures (ie. European ones) are able to create first world living standards, and anywhere they bring their cultures (such as America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), they create the same living standards. Other cultures (such as Muslim cultures) are entirely different from European ones, and therefore create different (and in my view, inferior) living standards.
When two or more cultures came in to contact throughout history, conflict was inevitable because of their differences. All groups want to live in a society that reflect their culture. For this reason, borders were set up so that each group could live among their own and live under their own cultural norms. Therefore, having differing cultural groups existing within the same borders, will just result in conflict as each side struggles to live under their own cultural norms without interference from others.
THIS IS WHY MULTICULTURALISM DOESN’T AND WILL NEVER EVER WORK!!!!
Mir Seddique, Mateen’s father told NBC News that “this had nothing to do with religion.”
He said it might have been because Mateen had seen two men kissing in Miami a couple of months earlier in front of his wife and son, and became angry.
But his anger has nothing to do with his religious beliefs. Sure, he has pledged his allegiance to ISIS, and sure, ISIS are opposed to homosexuality because of their religious beliefs, but it has absolutely nothing to do with his religious beliefs. It just made him angry for no actual reason.
Seriously this is what we’ve done to ourselves. It’s our own fault. We’re so arrogant to think that we could create a Utopian society where everyone lives together in peace that we’ve put plenty of our own in danger rather than accepting the evidence that’s right in front of us. It just won’t ever work. Women, children, and now gay people. Is it really worth it? Do we really need to see more and more of our own pay the price just to prove that we aren’t racist?
Do we really fear that word more than the potential loss of our way of life, and the literal loss of life? Is that how bad it has gotten?
Personally, I hope it hasn’t gotten that bad. And if it hasn’t, and people realise that self preservation trumps (no pun intended) not being called names, then this Omar Mateen may have been the straw that broke the camel’s back.