So the South African situation, which I have given frequent attention to over the past few years, has really started heating up recently. It has gotten so bad in fact, that it has even come to the attention of Donald Trump.
I have asked Secretary of State @SecPompeo to closely study the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers. “South African Government is now seizing land from white farmers.” @TuckerCarlson@FoxNews
Anyone who has paid any attention to what has been going on in South Africa, will be aware that all Trump has done here, is simply tell a truth that the Western media has deliberately ignored and covered up. Nothing he has said here is offensive. Nothing he said here is racist. And nothing he has said here is untrue.
So of course, he has managed to cause massive offence by saying it. And this “Bernstein” fellow really sums it up quite well.
This has been a /pol and a Stormfront meme forever and a hobbyhorse of racial nationalists everywhere. Unreal https://t.co/BpSdgKrNVj
What can you really say about this? It’s a completely hysterical reaction. The US regularly goes to war with countries ostensibly to “protect human rights”, for far less justification, than what is happening to white people in South Africa , and nobody bats an eye. Trump simply draws attention to what is happening to them, and people like this Bernstein fellow have a meltdown over it. The idea of white people ever being thought of as victims of racial persecution, is a concept they refuse to accept. And when you look at Bernstein’s tweets, it’s obvious why. They are terrified of white people in other parts of the world seeing what’s happening, and realising that the same will happen to them eventually, and waking up to the threat. They want to keep us asleep, until it’s too late to reverse what is happening.
But why is this Bernstein fellow so upset at the idea of white people waking up to the genocide that we’re facing? What is his interest in all this?
Yeah, I just can’t figure out why this “Bernstein” fellow would have a problem with Trump drawing attention to the plight of South African whites.
What do you think could be the reason, dear reader?
I’ve quite often mentioned the situation in South Africa because I’m of the belief that South Africa is actually just a preview of things to come in every single (currently) white majority country, in the future. They’re just a few decades further down the path then the rest of us, but the difference is, whereas it’s too late to prevent the inevitable there, there is still time for the rest of us, if we can learn from their mistakes. We can still get off this path in time, if we just wake up and come to our senses, before it’s too late. In the mean time, all we can do is look on from afar at the present situation in South Africa, and try to remind ourselves that we don’t want the same to happen to us.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa recently announced plans to allow white people’s land to be taken without compensation, which will then be distributed to black people in a move that he believes will be good for the economy.
It has been on the cards for quite some time, but now it’s official. They’re actually going to go through with the land confiscation. And everything I’ve heard on this topic, suggests that the whites will not give it up peacefully. The only question that really remains now, is whether the blacks will exterminate the whites, or will the whites successfully defend themselves in a civil war against them? Either way, bloodshed is inevitable now, and all we can do is wait and see what happens.
The president made the announcement late on Tuesday in a televised address to the nation.
I know it’s an overdone cliche at this point, but I’m going to do it anyway. Imagine if a white leader (for example, Trump), went on TV and announced that he was going to confiscate property from the black minority in America, without compensation, and hand it over to white people? Can you imagine the reaction, both within America itself, and globally?
Yeah of course it would not be tolerated at all. But seeing as it’s a black leader doing it to white people, nobody cares, because they’re brainwashed fools who believe in the idiotic myth of white privilege.
The farmers have claimed that the government’s plan will be “catastrophic and could lead to anarchy and food shortages like Venezuela or Zimbabwe”.
Which is exactly what I’m predicting too, by the way.
The economy of Zimbabwe collapsed after their own land reform was carried out.
“Just an unfortunate coincidence.”
More than 20 years after the end of apartheid in South Africa, white farmers still own the majority of South Africa’s land.
And why shouldn’t they? I already explained it in some detail in this previous post, but the vast majority of the land that makes up South Africa, was uninhabited, before it was colonised by Europeans. Most of the present day black South Africans are themselves descended from immigrants, who settled in South Africa AFTER it was already settled and built up by white people. They willingly chose to come to South Africa in order to share in the prosperity that the white people created, prosperity they could never create themselves. And now, instead of showing their gratitude, they’re driving out, stealing from, and exterminating their benefactors, and are rapidly pushing the country towards the same failed state as every other Sub-Saharan African country. They’re going to destroy themselves in the process, but they’re far too stupid to see that, just like the Zimbabweans were before them.
An organisation representing South Africans, AfriForum, said that land expropriation with no compensation would have “catastrophic results like in Venezuela and Zimbabwe”.
The organisation’s chief executive Kallie Kriel said: “History teaches us that international investors, regardless of what AfriForum or anyone else says, are unwilling to invest in a country where property rights are not protected.”
Yeah, but who cares about history? That’s all in the past. Sure, Communism has resulted in countless millions murdered every time it has been tried. Sure, followers of Islam have always tried to conquer and force their beliefs on every culture they have come into contact with. Sure, multiculturalism has resulted in conflict everywhere it has ever occurred. Sure what is being attempted in South Africa now, has already failed in Zimbabwe when it was tried there. We should try to make all these things work anyway, because… because… well you know what, I don’t even need to give a reason.
Ian Cameron, of AfriForum, said: “We’re really heading for a state of anarchy if something doesn’t change drastically.
Anarchy is probably the best case scenario. I think what we’re actually going to see will be more like Rwanda in 1994, but with the white South Africans in the place of the Tutsis. The rhetoricbeing directedtowards them, is already eerily similar.
“There are places where the police simply refuse to act. They don’t know the law well enough or refuse to apply it to logical reasoning when it comes to defending people’s property rights.”
Or more likely, they just don’t care to enforce the law.
In the 1990s black South Africans received grants and subsidies to buy land plots, which resulted in overcrowding and poor land use.
Because they were too incompetent to use it properly. That might not be such a big deal with small plots of subsistence land, but with massive commercial farms that the economy depends on, and that feed the population, it will be a massive disaster.
South Africa’s history of colonial conquest has pushed most of the black people into crowded urban areas or rural reserves.
They weren’t pushed onto anything. They willingly chose to immigrate to South Africa from other parts of the continent, because of the prosperity that the white South Africans had created, reproduced at a far higher rate than the whites did, until their population exploded, and ended up in their present situation. They have nobody to blame, but themselves.
The 1913 Native Lands Act made it illegal for Africans to acquire land beyond these reserves, which became known as “Homelands”.
They should just be thankful that they were allowed live in the country at all, seeing as they never could have created one with similar living standards themselves. It was actually for their own good in a way that they weren’t allowed to own land. If they had, they would have fucked the country up much sooner than they are now.
About one-tenth of land in white ownership has been transferred to black ownership since the end if apartheid, which is only a third of the government’s target.
Some investors think that Ramaphosa may be simply trying to win political points with the land reform ahead of an election next year.
Democracy in action folks.
Bennie Van Zyl, the general manager of the Agricultural Union of South Africa (TAU SA), said: “For us, this is a pity that they’ve made their choice, because no one will invest in this economy and we actually need growth to address the realities of South Africa. So we have great concern for this approach.
“A lot of foreign countries that have already contacted us as an organisation say if that is the case, we are not willing to invest in your country anymore.
“And if the ANC goes through with this, it will be devastating for this country.”
You’re damn right it will be, but I don’t think there’s any turning back now. It’s going to get very bad there very soon.
And I guarantee you that the media will be blaming the victims when it does happen.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. All this talk about “white privilege”, “white supremacy”, “white racism”, etc., it isn’t motivated by a desire for justice or equality, on the part of those who speak about it. It’s purely based on a vicious and genocidal hatred towards us. They don’t want to be equals with us. They want to exterminate us, and we’ve seen perfect examples of the future in store for us in Zimbabwe since Mugabe came to power, South Africa post-apartheid, and Haiti back in 1804.
And then after they’ve exterminated us and there is none of us left, they’ll be standing on our graves, cursing the fact that we ever existed at all. We only have two possible options. Total victory, or total annihilation. There is no middle ground. There is no compromise. How can we possibly expect to find common ground with an enemy that wants nothing less than our complete destruction?
For a long time, this enemy was subtle. We’ve spent the last few decades grovelling for forgiveness for imaginary crimes, all while they have taken more and more ground in their war against us. We couldn’t see the truth because we were too busy wallowing in our own guilt and desperately trying to make amends. “Yes take my ancestral homeland. Take my resources. Blow up my countrymen. Rape my daughter. Just please don’t call me racist”, and for a long time this actually worked. However, they gradually pushed too far, too fast, and as the Brexit result, the Trump election victory, and the rising popularity of “far right” political parties all over Europe has shown, a backlash has been happening. Now our enemy is in panic mode, the mask has slipped, and rather than maintaining composure and continuing to play the long-game, they’re lashing out, and exposing themselves as the vicious, genocidal maniacs that they always were.
A City University of New York sociology professor reportedly said in a tweetstorm last week that “the white-nuclear family” promotes racism, prompting a backlash on social media.
There you go. This woman literally made the claim that the “white-nuclear family promotes racism”. In other words, she’s saying it’s wrong for white people to marry other white people and to have white children together, because this is racist. She’s literally saying that our continued existence is racist. Therefore is it not obvious what the solution is? We have to stop existing in order to put an end to racism.
But of course, “white genocide” is just a crazy, far right conspiracy theory, that only far-right, Neo-Nazi, white supremacists, believe in. It doesn’t matter that it’s blatantly out in the open. It’s still just a crazy conspiracy theory.
Jessie Daniels, described as an expert on “the Internet manifestations of racism” on her CUNY page, infuriated social media users after reportedly saying that white families promote racism by default.
They misspelled “CUNT page”.
The professor began her argument saying she learned that “the white-nuclear family is one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy,” adding that that families “reproducing white children” are “part of the problem” as they facilitate white supremacy in the country, Campus Reform reported.
White people having children promotes white supremacy. Therefore white people need to stop having children, or if they must, they should make a point of having mixed race children only. Who cares if the person they fall in love with is another white person? Who cares if they want to have children who look like them? They have to either forego reproduction, or mate with people of other races, or else Jessie Daniels will call them racist. Of course, it’s still perfectly acceptable for black people to have black children, Asian people to have Asian children, Latino people to have Latino children, etc. This rule only applies to white people.
She reportedly tweeted: “I mean, if you’re a white person who says they’re engaged in dismantling white supremacy but … you’re forming a white family (and) reproducing white children that ‘you want the best for’ – how is that helping [and] not part of the problem?”
I would ask how is it causing a problem, but we all know that we won’t actually get an answer to that question, because then she would have to admit the truth, which is that as far as she is concerned, white people existing at all is the problem.
She reportedly ended her arguement suggesting that “white people” should confront their racism and stop perpetuating inequality by leaving their homes for their children.
“Until white people are ready to confront their own family’s racism (and) participation in systemic white supremacy, it’s not getting dismantled,” she wrote. “Beyond just calling out interpersonal racism, white people who want to be engaged in the work need to ask themselves about housing wealth.”
She added: “White people: do you own your home? When you die, where’s wealth in that house going? If it’s to your children, you’re reproducing (inequality).”
Yes you horrible white people. How dare you work hard, make responsible decisions, and end up owning a home of your own? It doesn’t matter how you obtained the wealth to own that home. The fact that you own it at all is an example of “inequality”. You have no right to pass that home that you worked hard to buy, on to your own children. That wealth needs to be shared with minorities who have less, even if they only have less wealth because of their own laziness, stupidity, and general incompetence.
Don’t worry ma’am. We’ll find some guilt ridden white sucker to leave their hard-earned wealth to you, instead of their own children.
The professor locked her account in response to the criticism. Fox News reached out to the professor and the university early Tuesday and did not receive an immediate response.
She obviously wasn’t prepared to defend her statements. People like this aren’t used to talking to people. They’re used to talking at people, and when people start talking back, they can’t handle it.
Anyway, as I was saying before, I just can’t understand this mentality. Why would a “white” woman say such vicious and hateful things towards other white people? It just makes no sense to me that a “white” person could possibly hate their own race so much, to the point that they would like to see them go extinct. What could possibly be the explan…
All across the Western world, governments are at war with the ordinary people. Don’t be fooled into thinking that their disastrous and destructive decisions are the result of stupidity, cowardice in the face of political correctness, naive optimism, or whatever. Nobody is this incompetent for real. Nobody with even the slightest understanding of cause and effect would be making these insane decisions, with the expectation that they’ll actually work out well. No, what we are seeing is a deliberate and conscious decision to ruin the lives of the people that they are supposed to represent and protect. It is important that we all remember this fact, for if things ever start turning around, and they try to pretend that they always meant well. They’ll need to answer for their crimes against us.
A five-year-old Christian girl placed in foster care with a Muslim family has been ordered to go and live with her relatives.
Why was she not allowed to live with her relatives in the first place? Surely that would be the logical thing to do, if they really cared about the wellbeing of the child. Of course, we know damn well that they don’t care about the wellbeing of little white English girls at all. They’ve allowed untold thousands of them to be raped by Muslim men, and then they deliberately forced this child to live with a Muslim family, putting her at similar risk, rather than doing the sane thing and letting her live with relatives. Remember what I said already. Nobody is this incompetent. Any idiot would know that it would be better for a child to live with relatives if for whatever reason, they can’t live with their immediate family. This was deliberate.
The move follows reports that the young girl was being encouraged to speak Arabic in a foster family where English is rarely spoken.
Why are these people even in Britain? They’re not integrating. They choose their own language and culture over that of the country they immigrated to. How does Britain benefit from their presence?
The girl, whose identity is being protected, was reportedly taken to back to her grandmother’s after a judge ruled she should stop living with her current foster family.
Should have been brought to her grandmother’s in the first place.
According to The Times, the girl was being encouraged to abandon Christian traditions and values in favour of Muslim ones.
And of course we know that if the reverse happened, that being, if a Christian family tried to force convert a Muslim child, there would be outrage.
Tower Hamlets Council, the authority responsible for handling the girl’s foster care, denied that the family did not speak English.
A council spokesman said she had been placed in an ‘English-speaking family of mixed race’ and that there ‘inaccuracies’ in reports published.
Yes and we can trust the word of the British authorites. It’s not as if they ever lie at all, or ignore the wellbeing of children when it comes to dealing with the Muslim community. Well except for all the times when they do exactly that, of course.
Social services bosses at the council said staff have ‘always been working towards the child being looked after by a family member’.
Why does this even take any effort at all? Surely it’s just common sense that a child is in better hands with their own family, and this should be the default, rather than something to work towards. There’s no logical reason to hand a child over to a family of strangers, especially one of a vastly different cultural and racial background, unless the real aim was for the child to suffer.
‘We would like to give more details but we are legally restricted to do so,’ a council spokesman said in a statement.
“There are powerful people who don’t want us exposing the truth. Go back to your alcohol, your premier league football, and your Kardashians. You can trust us to make the important decisions, while you distract yourselves.”
‘Tower Hamlets Council has the welfare of children at the heart of what we do.
The decision to choose foster carers for a child is based on a number of factors including cultural background and proximity to promote contact with the child’s family and the child’s school in order to give them as much stability as possible.
“Cultural background is one of the factors we take into account.”
*Proceeds to send child to a family with a completely different cultural background.*
‘We have always been working towards the child being looked after by a family member and we continue to do so.’
Again let me ask, why is this something to “work towards”? Why isn’t it the default?
A spokesman for the Judicial Office said Judge Khatun Sapnara had re-examined the case at a family court hearing on Tuesday and decided she should live with her grandmother.
Too little, too late. The poor child has already suffered unnecessarily.
Bill Nye, an actor who became famous in the 1990s for pretending to be a scientist on some Disney channel show appeared on a panel a few months ago, to discuss climate change. The panel suggested that population growth is a significant factor in climate change, and that population control (perhaps taking the form of something akin to China’s “One child policy”), might be necessary in order to prevent catastrophic climate changes. However they only seem to advocate population control for one particular group of people, which will be blatantly obvious, once you watch the video.
Isn’t it interesting really, that most of the really out of control population growth is happening in the Third World currently? In most of the developed world however, birth rates are already falling below replacement level. Yet despite the fact that the developed world is already having less children than necessary just to maintain a steady and stable population level, Nye and his fellow panelists suggest that it is they specifically who need to have less children. Meanwhile, China and India between them have about one third of the entire global population, and are two of the biggest polluters of all, yet nobody is advocating population control for them. As usual, it’s only being pushed on white majority countries, most of which already have declining birth rates as it is.
And sure, we know exactly what will happen then. White majority countries will start having even less children. Suddenly, the media and political establishment will put out scaremongering stories about how we have an “aging population” and that we need a population increase, in order to keep the economy going. This will be used to justify for even more mass immigration from the third world, with the hopes of eventually making us minorities in our own ancestral homelands.
You see, they can’t realistically make the claim that the first world needs to curtail its population growth, in order to fight climate change, and at the same time claim that people in the first world aren’t having enough babies, so we need to bring more people from the third world into the first world, in order to offset a shrinking population. Yet this is exactly what they’re doing. If first world population growth was really causing climate change and therefore needed to be curtailed, it makes absolutely no sense to then start bringing more people into the first world from outside, where they’ll help contribute to the problem, but yet they do try to push both of these contradictory positions at the same time anyway.
This is because they want nothing less than the extermination and extinction of white people. They don’t give a damn about the environment, nor do they give a damn about the plight of people in the third world. They just really hate white people and will use any tactic in order to speed up our demise. Luckily enough, from reading the comments on the video, it seems that most people can see right through them.
The current President of Turkey (and wannabe Sultan of a new version of the Ottoman Empire) Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a man with a personality profile that would be considered too over the top and unbelievable as the basis for a James Bond villain…
… has come out and told ethnic Turks who are living in Europe to have five children rather than three (the amount usually encouraged within Turkey itself), so that they can “stake a claim for their rights” or some such bullshit in Europe.
President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has called on Turkish citizens living in Europe to have five children – two more than his usual calls to Turks in the homeland – in a bid to multiply their presence in the continent so that they will be the “future of Europe.”
Can it really get more obvious than that? He’s literally encouraging his own citizens to try and outbreed and eventually conquer the native Europeans in their own ancestral homelands. This is nothing new of course. Anyone who has any understanding of history that took place before the 1930s (so not many people really) will be well aware that Europe’s entire historical relationship with the Turks has been one of them attempting to conquer us, and us resisting these attempts.
They may very well have eventually succeeded in conquering the entire continent, if not for their defeat in the 1683 Battle of Vienna. After that defeat, the tide really started turning against them. They gradually started getting pushed out of Europe and North Africa in the 200 years or so following this, until by the outbreak of WW1, this is what was left of their empire.
However, people seem to have this belief that just because Europeans have no interest in colonialism and conquest anymore, that nobody else does either. The reality is that ever since Islam first came along 1400 years ago, it’s entire existence has been one of conquest and subjugation. The only problem for the once mighty Turks is that for the past few centuries, they’ve been too weak to take Europe on anymore. This doesn’t mean that they lost the will to conquer. They’ve just been waiting for the right opportunity to get started again, and now that Europe is so crippled with political correctness, white guilt, and below replacement level birth rates, they see that the opportunity has presented itself at last.
“I am calling out to my citizens, by brothers and sisters in Europe,” Erdoğan said at a rally in the Central Anatolian province of Eskişehir on March 17. “Have not just three but five children.”
“The place in which you are living and working is now your homeland and new motherland. Stake a claim to it. Open more businesses, enroll your children in better schools, make your family live in better neighborhoods, drive the best cars, live in the most beautiful houses,” he said. “That’s because you are the future of Europe. It will be the best answer to the vulgarism, antagonism, and injustice made against you.”
In case you’re wondering what he means by “vulgarism, antagonism, and injustice”, what he means is the expectation that European people have of them to stop acting like a bunch of primitive, violent, barbarian, savages, and actually contribute to society instead. How evil of us.
Erdoğan’s message comes amid ongoing political tension after Turkish ministers’ attempts to stage rallies with members of the Turkish community living in Europe were denied by some countries and after the European Court of Justice ruled to allow employers to ban workers from wearing visible religious symbols, including the headscarf.
And why exactly should Turkish citizens in Europe be allowed to stage political rallies for Turkey, on European streets? Would Turkey allow European people the same freedom in Turkey? He’s acting like a spoiled child whose mother told him he can’t have anymore sweets. In fairness, I blame the treacherous cunt, Angela Merkel, for giving into every one of his whims so far.
As for the headscarf thing, if an employer has a dress code, why should certain people be exempt because of their religion (the ban applies to all religions, not just Islam btw). If Islam is so important to them, then why not just stay in the backwards, Islamic hellhole they came from instead?
Slamming the decision known as the “headscarf ban,” Erdoğan said: “They are banning the headscarf. We are fed up. Where is the freedom of religion, freedom of conscience? Ban the kippa if you can. Can they [ban the kippa]?”
If you don’t like it then leave. Islam has no historical claim to the success or development of Europe. In fact, the entire history of Europe has been about keeping Islam out. The fact that you’re allowed to practice your religion in Europe at all, after more than a millennium of trying to conquer us and force it upon us, is a testament to how overly generous we really are. If the majority of people today had a proper understanding of our relationship with Turks, and indeed, Islam in general, we might be doing a lot more than just “banning headscarves”
He also claimed that the real reason behind the rising antagonism toward Turks in Europe was “the discomfort they feel as Turkey has become an independent country with its economy and situation in the world.”
“The Turkey they dream is a dependent country which they can order around,” he said. “They have no discomfort with the Turk who is a worker in the factory, but they cannot bear any Turk who becomes an owner, engineer or manager of this factory.”
No, the reason for any rising antagonism towards Turks in Europe is because they’ve failed to integrate into their host societies. In fact, Erdogan himself has outright told them not to. Native Europeans are getting sick and tired of having to deal with such a worthless and useless people. If they love Turkey so much, and would prefer to live under Turkish customs, rather than the customs of their host nations, then why not just do the obvious thing and return to Turkey? Well, the answer is quite simple. They’re engaged in a long term strategy of subverting and eventually conquering Europe, so they can remake it in Turkey’s image. They’ll never integrate. They’ll just play the long game until they have the numbers to force Europe to integrate with them. There are only two options here. Either they conquer Europe, or Europe forces them out. There is no peaceful third option.
The rest of the article isn’t really relevant, so I won’t be responding to it. Meanwhile, while Erdogan is calling for Turks to outbreed the European people, another Turkish minister is suggesting that there could be a “religious war” in Europe soon.
Europe will soon be the site of “religion wars,” Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said on March 16, in Ankara’s first comment on the general elections in the Netherlands that saw the victory of Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Liberal VVD.
“Now the election is over in the Netherlands … “When you look at the many parties you see there is no difference between the social democrats and fascist [Geert] Wilders. All have the same mentality. Where will you go? Where are you taking Europe? You have begun to collapse Europe. You are dragging Europe into the abyss. Holy wars will soon begin in Europe,” Çavuşoğlu said on March 16, in Ankara’s first comment on the general election in the Netherlands that saw the victory of Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Liberal VVD.
“They killed each other 100 years ago because they were of different faiths,” he added, without elaborating.
“But they learned a lesson from this and then set up the European Union and the Council of Europe,” he added.
I would agree that Europe is beginning to collapse and is being dragged into the abyss. However, I don’t agree with his assessment as to why. This guy seems to think that the native Europeans are the ones with the problem, because after decades of pathetic deference, we’re finally saying enough is enough, and are standing up for our own interests. I, on the other hand, think the problem was that we were too generous and accommodating to these people. We should never have been so reckless in letting millions of them to immigrate to Europe like we did. The fact is, there would be no possibility of any “holy wars” breaking out in Europe, if we hadn’t allowed millions of these people in, in the first place.
Anyway, if you take these two articles together, they really paint a grim picture of the future. You’ve one article predicting a war of cultures, and in the other, you have the leading figure of the invading culture, encouraging his people to increase their numbers… most likely in preparation for this inevitable war. I’ll finish this post off with a video from “Black Pigeon Speaks”, in which he gives his thoughts on the situation facing us.
I’ve mentioned many times before (including in my most recent post) that a country is a reflection of the people who live there, not the other way around. What I mean by that, is that the country doesn’t make the people what they are, the people make the country what it is and so, when those people are moved to another country, they will have an effect on the new country, rather than than the new country changing them.
Now lets take a look at Somalia. There’s a reason this country is a poverty stricken, dangerous hellhole, and it isn’t because of colonialism, racist white people, voodoo curses, kryptonite, radioactive spider bites, or any other lame excuse that might be given to explain it. No, the reason why Somalia is the way it is, is because the people who live there are a bunch of feckless, lazy, violent, moronic, imbeciles, with an average IQ of 68… borderline retarded by first world standards. Moving hundreds of thousands, or even millions of these people to Europe, isn’t going to bring them up to European standards, and it certainly won’t be a boom to the European economies. Instead, they’re going to drag Europe down to Somalia’s standards, and that can be clearly seen, when reading this article.
“Somalia, Sudan, Libya,” – the names of countries patter begins to pour on the outskirts of Munich, Heidemanis street, located in the center of the approaches to meet migrants dark-skinned young men.
Isn’t it interesting how everyone is so focused on the Syrian civil war, that nobody is paying attention to every other country that people are coming from? I still have yet to see an explanation as to how Europe can possibly handle the influx of people coming in from what seems to be the entirety of the Middle East, South Asia, and Northern and Central Africa. We will be overrun eventually.
City outskirts, semi-industrial area, set up a reception center for migrant simultaneously accommodated about 1,200 people. Although after a few weeks, migrants from the center raised elsewhere, it is never empty.
And it never will be empty, because there’s no end in sight for this mass migration. They will keep on coming until Europe chooses to put an end to it. By the time the willpower exists to do that, it may already be too late.
On arrival at the center approaches impossible not to notice a bright blue painted and sprinkled with various inscriptions fence: looking at the white background of the winter very bright street art, between different people’s cultures and religions attributed to characters in the eye drops are repetitive inscription “Welcome”. It is in this greeting a few months ago the Germans greeted their country arrived in the overcrowded trains migrants from southern Europe.
Central approaches can be seen not only back and forth over by volunteers, but their destination have reached the migrants, who are from this center can go out and come back to it again in the security station to produce documents.
At first glance it seems that the majority roam around 18-30 years for men. These groups are attracted to public transport stations, from where travel to the city center or just go for a walk after the center approaches. In the city center through the half-open net rushing and one other family with children.
Yeah, we already know it’s mainly young men. Young men, who are supposedly fleeing from a civil war in Syria, while the women, children, and elderly, stay back home to fight it. Of course, we know the Syrian war narrative is a complete fabrication at this point, and most migrants aren’t coming from there, but you would think even people who are clueless to the fact that it’s mainly non-Syrians who are arriving in Europe, would at least wonder why it’s mainly men. Unfortunately, most people are asleep, and don’t think about the world, beyond whatever is happening on Coronation Street, or whatever Kim Kardashian is doing lately.
How then were able to learn certain premises populated center of the family, individually housed and single mothers with children, as well as separate facilities at the living men who arrived without families.
Part of the center supervisors – as well as non-ethnic Germans, and people who can communicate with the different sides arrived migrants and natives all cultural, religious or communication with foreigners characteristics.
English understands, but does not want to speak
Most agree the center of the migrants do not speak. Although often they obviously pay, or at least understand English, when asked whether she would accept a few minutes to talk, just shakes his head and pressure away.
True, there are those who agree to talk, but after seeing the work of a journalist’s license and are confident that this particular document, begins to smile shyly and say do not understand questions. Centre volunteers have also confirmed that the majority of migrants, at least a little English.
But sure they’ll be a boom to Germany’s economy in no time at all. They’ll be paying the pensions of retiring Germans, for decades to come.
The portal lrytas.lt women journalists met ten days ago to talk to the migrant reception center comes Abdulah, just asked to have reached Germany from Somalia, began brandishing hand to tell the smallest details of the trip.
He spoke broken English, regularly įpindamas and their native language words, so the long narrative was able to understand that the Somali boat he reached Italy and then took a train to Germany.
“He had to escape the brutal civil war in Italy.”
Seriously, does nobody else think this is insane? That uneducated and economically useless people from the third world, can just walk into Europe like this without doing so legally, and isn’t sent back straight away? How does this benefit Europe?
Laugh travel price
Asked whether this was an expensive trip, the guy replied that the cost is very high – up to eight thousand dollars. As soon as they heard this statement, his buddies, until all the questions atsakinėdavę “no english” throws voice kvatotis and fellow pat on the shoulder praising him for ingenuity.
“But they’re so poor and impoverished”.
“I come alone, but in Somalia remained in my family,” – continues even not ask the other person says and hints that he got only reached Germany immediately to his family reported that he is alive and healthy. Here again during the course of the conversation with curiosity the next circle of mocking laughter swept wave.
Abdulah Germany – yet only ten days, but already has a very big plans: “As soon as I get the German citizenship as soon as you bring your family here. Our family is not very big – only ten people. It’s my parents, brothers and sisters. Or maybe they will be able to enter the bus as much as before, “- he considered.
“As soon as I reached Germany, they immediately telephoned. They are very happy, “- smiling broadly Abdulah and his fortune friends, just heard about it, that called to the house in Somalia, once again he began to chuckle.
“Not a big family.”
Germany meanwhile has the lowest birth rate on the planet.
The Germans are well on their way to being ethnically cleansed and replaced.
But sure, that’s a good thing remember? The Jew politician told us so.
“People shouldn’t be judged based on the group they came from. Not all Muslims are terrorists. Not all gypsies are thieving, parasitic scum. Not all blacks are violent thugs. However, all ethnic Germans are Nazis, and are guilty of crimes committed 70 years ago, even if they weren’t born at the time.”
In Germany – not to work and live
Abdulah rushing to assure that it is sure to remain in Munich and will not take place anywhere from here, he likes the conditions. “Here I will be able to learn the German language, it’s got to do first,” – says a young man. But when asked what later would like to work in Germany, he smiles: “No, no … I like to walk in the mountains, but to work – not. I want to live in Germany. “
He doesn’t want to work in Germany. He just wants to live off German tax-payer funded welfare, like the worthless parasite that he is. You can be sure his friends with “no English”, feel the same way. Then when they bring their “small families of ten” to live in Germany with them, they’ll be equally as lazy and useless. Meanwhile, the Germans will be taxed into oblivion to pay for these wasters, and won’t be able to afford to start families of their own, because of the high cost of living. This is genocide, no matter how they might try and dress it up.
Also, can you see what I mean now about blaming the Somali people themselves for Somalia being a failed state? How could anyone expect the country to be in any other state than what it is, if this is the caliber of people who live there?
Heidemanis street migrants can spend up to eight weeks. It heard Abdulah pretend that this information is new to him: “No, they promised me that I have lived here. Only eight weeks? We are here to stay forever. “
A parasite doesn’t leave it’s host willingly.
“We love Germany”
Heidemanis street in the center of migrant arrivals can live, here they are fed, they are advised to attend an intensive German language course, provided free of charge to doctors, as well as dental services.
Newcomers are provided with clothing, they are provided, and various other forms of assistance.
Nothing is for free. German tax-payers are paying for these services.
Winter – no problem, the Germans made sure that we make up. There are very good people, we like them a lot, “- said the guy showing his down jacket. The conversation still trying to interfere with his fortune friends smiling broadly kept repeating that they really like in Germany.
Yes, I’m sure they do really like their benefactors. In much the same way Anna Nicole Smith really loved her 90 year old billionaire husband, for the year she was married to him before inheriting his fortune.
“We love Germany” – an enthusiastic thumbs-up raised Abdulah friends goodbye and went their own ways.
It’s pretty sad isn’t it? As I said, the average IQ in Somalia is 68, yet in this case, the Germans are the ones being outwitted in this relationship. But that’s political correctness for you. Certain obvious realities have to be denied, in case it’s offensive. And so, the Germans are doomed to subsidise the lives of parasites like these until they finally go extinct, all to avoid being called mean names like “racist” if they dare to resist.
Vile racist Rezzas Abdulla spat in a baby’s face and told her shocked mum “white people shouldn’t breed” in a disgraceful street attack.
But it’s just a conspiracy theory of course when people like myself claim that there is a deliberate agenda to see white people go extinct, with policies such as multiculturalism being put in place as a means to that end. Yep, just a crazy conspiracy theory.
Hairdresser Rebecca Telford was wheeling nine-month-old Layla-Jean through South Shields when Abdulla launched the unprovoked afternoon assault, leaning into her pushchair to spit on her.
The little girl was left covered in saliva, which sprayed across her face in the disgusting attack.
A nine-month-old child was spat on simply for being born white in a predominately white country. Remind me again, what are the benefits to this seemingly failing multicultural experiment, and in what way do these alleged benefits compensate for incidents like this?
A court heard Abdulla has previous for race hate offences and has “a problem with white women”.
And yet he willingly chooses to live in a white majority country, rather than back in whichever Islamic shithole he, or his parents (if he was born in Britain himself), originally came from. Why is that? If they hate white people so much, why do they choose to live in a country full of white people?
As I’ve always said before, a country’s living standards and cultural values, is entirely a reflection of the population who inhabit and run it, not the other way around. Look at North America for example. Canada and the United States were built by, and still today, are inhabited by people of European descent (ie, White people) and these countries enjoy first world living standards, much like Europe does. Mexico on the other hand trails far behind those two countries, despite being in the same part of the world. It’s not as if there’s some kind of magical force that only extends as far as the Mexican border, which allows these countries to have first world living standards. The only difference is the people who control these countries.
Then, there is Australia and New Zealand, also inhabited by white majorities, which also enjoy first world living standards, similar to those of Europe, Canada, and the United States. Apartheid era South Africa and Rhodesia were also built by white people and they too, enjoyed first world living standards, and on a continent filled with economic and political basket cases, no less. Now, under black majority rule, Zimbabwe is a joke of a country, and South Africa (while still functioning for the most part at this point) is well on itsway to becominga failedstate itself. Just really think about all this, and put aside any politically correct biases you might feel. I think if you look at it with an open mind, the conclusion is obvious.
But now the 33-year-old, who has some mental health issues, has walked free from Newcastle Crown Court on a suspended prison sentence.
Oh what a surprise. The great mental health crisis that only seems to effect Muslims in Europe, and only seems to cause them to target European people, strikes again. I guess at least this time nobody was killed for a change.
Miss Telford told police in a victim impact statement: “I am completely disgusted and distressed that a grown man, regardless of race or religion, would spit on a defenceless baby in a completely unprovoked attack.
You’re not the only one. My blood was boiling when I read this story.
“If he had just walked by I would not have even noticed him, there was no eye contact and no words had been exchanged. I had never seen him before.
“I believe he spat on her purely because we are white, I was a lone female and an easy target.”
Gee, how did you come to that conclusion? Did it have anything to do with the fact that he specifically said that “white people shouldn’t breed” after doing it?
The court heard the mother and baby were heading down Chichester Road, in South Shields, last January when they had to misfortune to encounter Abdulla, who approached without warning.
Prosecutor Emma Dowling said: “He leant into the pushchair and spat into the face of her daughter.
“As he did so, he shouted or said ‘white people shouldn’t breed’ then walked off.”
The court heard when the baby’s stunned mother confronted Abdulla, he told her to “shut the **** up” and walked off.
How did Britain ever survive in the days before multiculturalism? I can’t believe the racist Brits ever voted “Yes” in the Brexit referendum, primarily due to dissatisfaction with immigration policies, when I read stories like this one.
A shocked passer-by gave Ms Telford a tissue to clean the saliva off the child’s face.
Was there no passer by around who was willing to punch this piece of shit in the face for what he did? I’m not a violent person myself, but if I had seen something like this happen, I’d have made an exception.
The mum attempted to take a picture of her baby’s attacker as he walked away but was too shaken by what had happened.
Layla-Jean was taken to the doctor after the attack for tests.
Makes sense. You never know what kind of diseases this filthy animal could have been carrying.
Abdulla, of Imeary Street, South Shields, who has two previous convictions for race-hate offences on white females, was later tracked down through CCTV.
He was found guilty of racially aggravated common assault after a trial at South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court, which he did not attend.
He was given eight months suspended for 18 months, with rehabilitation and mental health treatment requirements.
Imagine that. Two previous convictions for similar crimes in the past, and this time his target was a nine-month-old baby… and all he gets is a suspended sentence. Is it any wonder that people are losing faith in the justice system? Perfectly in line with the goals of Cultural Marxism.
Sentencing him, Recorder Darren Preston said: “There is something viscerally horrible and disgusting about spitting at someone, particularly in the face and to do so to a baby was particularly disgusting, let alone, to make things even worse, when your motivation for doing so is racial hatred.
But not horrible enough to put the piece of shit in prison apparently.
“You have got a problem, it seems to me, with white women.”
Yeah, how did you figure that one out?
The court heard after the attack last January, Abdulla spent time, between July and September, receiving psychiatric treatment in hospital, which has continued after his release into the community.
Such valuable contributions. A mentally ill hater of white people, who is somehow allowed to live in a country that was built by white people. In a sane world, he never would have been allowed into Britain in the first place.
The judge said Abdulla’s deteriorating mental health at the time of the attack contributed towards the offence.
Recorder Preston added that society would be better served by Abdulla being allowed to continue his psychiatric treatment.
Society would be better served if he was deported back to wherever he came from.
Vic Laffey, mitigating, said medical evidence shows Abdulla’s mental health was deteriorating in the six months leading to his hospital admission with schizophrenia last summer and he now receives anti-psychotic treatment in the community.
Probably paid for by British tax-payers, the majority of whom, would be white. Aren’t they so privileged to be white?
Mr Laffey added: “The suggests he was ill, or becoming ill, at the time this offence was committed.
“He is clearly vulnerable himself, he has significant support from his family and is making progress.”
He’s the real victim here, apparently. It’s not his fault that he hates white people so much. His mental illness, combined with the fact that he’s surrounded by white people, is what caused him to lash out. He needs our sympathy, not the child.
I often tell myself that when it comes to Sweden, nothing can surprise me anymore. Yet they always manage to do so anyway. This latest story from my favourite country of self-genociding lunatics, is so ridiculous, that it’s almost impossible to comprehend that this isn’t a story from The Onion. This is peak Sweden.
Allan Widman, chairman of the Swedish parliamentary defense committee, demands that individuals are prohibited from wearing bulletproof vests to protect themselves from the increasing violence, which he believes will increase further without a ban, reports Sydsvenskan.
You just gotta love the logic this guy is using. The Swedish government has imported a huge number of hostile and incompatible people and forced their native population to live alongside them. These hostile and incompatible people have caused violence to increase in Sweden, leading to people being forced to buy bulletproof vests to protect themselves from this increase in violence. This idiot then comes to the conclusion that bulletproof vests will make the violence worse, and decides that the solution to the problem is to ban their purchase, rather than putting a stop to immigration of the sort of people who are committing the violence in the first place, thus leaving the native people defenceless.
And people actually laughed at me in the past when I made the claim that Sweden is trying to exterminate it’s own population.
Widman has written a bill to the parliament in which he demands that it should be illegal and punishable for individuals to wear body armor – which is classified as military equipment – in the public place.
I really have no words to respond here.
The reason for this is that many young criminals wear bulletproof vests, and Widman believes that that the protective vests contribute to escalate the level of violence in the Swedish society – and that a ban could lower it.
So because young criminals (allegedly) wear bulletproof vests, no law abiding person is allowed to wear them anymore. As if a criminal is suddenly going to stop wearing them because they’re illegal. What an idiotic concept, expecting a criminal not to do something, once it’s made illegal.
This is purely about leaving the ordinary people defenceless. I understand that it’s difficult to comprehend the idea of a government in a first world, Western democracy, deliberately working to exterminate it’s own population, because it seems like a really crazy idea, but that really is what’s happening here.
– I believe that the sense of personal security that wearing armor gives, helps to lower the threshold for the use of serious violence, he says.
No actual evidence needed to support his claim. He just makes a claim based on his feelings on the matter and as a result, terrified, ordinary people are at risk of getting killed because of his decision.
Just a few weeks ago, a bulletproof vest probably saved the life of a 18-year-old in Malmö, and more people, not just criminals, buy and wear bulletproof vests in the increasingly tougher Swedish society, where bullets some times fly right beside hand grenades.
Literally giving an example of a young life that could have been lost, if this ban had already been in place. How many unnecessary lives will be lost in the future, if it does come into effect?
But now the Swedes better take cover and hope that they have very robust skin.
Or maybe, they should stop being so politically correct, and actually vote for a party that will put an end to this mass immigration, and start deporting those who are already there. It’s either that, or just lay down and die. There are no other options.
Arnold Mballe Sube and his wife Jeanne, both 33, share a three-bedroom council house with their eight kids.
Only 33 years old, and he already has 8 kids. He’ll probably have doubled that number by the time his wife hits the menopause.
Typically in Africa, it was normal to have large families because few children survived until adulthood. Therefore it made sense from an evolutionary perspective to have more kids in the hopes that at least a few of them would survive. This is called “r selection breeding strategy”, whereas Europeans tend to favour a “K-selection strategy”. Since 1950 however, European medicine and financial aid has improved life expectancy in Africa, so most kids aren’t dying before reaching adulthood anymore. Their breeding patterns however have remained the same , as if most of their children still died before reaching adulthood, not just in Africa, but everywhere they migrate to. In 1950, the African population was approximately 200 Million. By 2100, it’s projected to be 4.2 Billion. That’s 21 times the population size in just 150 years. That means that by 2250, if current trends continue, there will 88.2 Billion people in Africa, unless they either start breeding like Europeans, or some major Malthusian catastrophe occurs. I’m leaning more towards the latter being most likely myself.
But the couple say they need at least six doubles for them to be comfortable.
Your comfort is irrelevant you ungrateful bastard. Why should the British taxpayers foot the bill for your inability to use contraception?
They claim the living conditions are “terrible” but turned down a larger home because of a lack of storage space.
Those “terrible conditions” are far better than the conditions you would be living under if you were back in Africa living under the living standards that exist in every single black run country on the planet. You should be grateful that you were given the opportunity to live in not one, but two first world countries, something your own racial demographic has consistently failed to replicate.
Student Arnold, 33, said: “Me and my family have been neglected. It’s so cramped and the conditions are terrible.
The guy is a student. Let that sink in. He isn’t even in a position where he can support himself, yet he has a wife and eight kids (so far), and expects the British taxpayers to pick up the slack for him, and to top it all off, he isn’t even a British citizen himself. He’s a worthless parasite. This is exactly what I meant before about white genocide. We have a system in which we tax the indigenous white populations of Europe into oblivion to the point where they can’t afford to have children themselves, and redistribute these taxes to help non-white people like this parasite, to outbreed us in our own countries.
At the same time that all this is happening, our elites and our media have the cheek to tell us that immigration is necessary to offset demographic collapse because we aren’t having enough children ourselves to keep our population stable, even though they’ve deliberately created a system which discourages us from doing so. Mass third world immigration isn’t the solution to the demographic crisis. Rather, it’s one of the causes of it, and the people in power know this because it’s a deliberate policy to ethnically cleanse and replace us. If maintaining a stable population level was really the goal, then it would be very easy to increase the birth rate in European people if the money that is being used to support the fake migrant crisis was instead used to support the growth of European families instead. Europeans want to have more children, so that isn’t the issue. The issue is that our elites are deliberately trying to suppress our birth rates and increase those of other groups who they want to replace us.
“Everyone is sleeping everywhere and my wife is sleeping with the baby so I am on the sofa.
“I am homeless in my home now.
“My children are finding it difficult. We can’t eat as a family, we all have to eat in different parts of the house.
“The area is the worst area I have ever lived in my life. This is the worst house.”
Nobody cares. You still have a better quality of life than you deserve, in regards to how productive you are.
Arnold and full-time mum Jeanne moved from France in 2012 so that he could study mental health nursing at the University of Bedfordshire.
His children are eldest daughter Mejane, 16, Fabian, 13, Analia, 13, ten-year old Prosper, nine-year-old Dylan, six-year-old twins Sharon and Stacy and three-week-old Mary.
So he already had seven of his eight children when he decided to just up and leave France to become a full-time student instead. This is such irresponsible behaviour on his part. If he wanted to study so badly, either his wife should have taken up a job to support him, or he should have kept working, and studied part-time instead. Can you imagine what must go through a person’s head who thinks it’s perfectly acceptable to give up his job to study, when he has seven kids and a non-working wife to support? Only a selfish entitled bastard who expects everyone else to fund his lifestyle would have the audacity to do this. Most other people would have more self respect.
Luton Borough Council housed the family in a temporary hotel for almost four months before they moved to their current property.
Probably cost them a fortune too. Don’t worry whitey, your taxes are being well spent.
The three-bedroom end-terraced house where they currently live in Bletchley, Bucks., costs £1,278 per month.
Don’t worry whitey, your taxes are paying for that too. It’s worth it because this genius will eventually qualify as a mental health nurse. It’s an investment.
This is fully covered by Luton Borough Council – costing the taxpayer £15,000 a year in rent.
Money well spent. Who needs to fund the NHS, when we can spend it on wonderful investments like this instead?
Arnold claims the property is not suitable and he says he has enlisted the help of solicitors to help get him the house he wants.
Gee, I wonder how he can afford those solicitors when he isn’t working. I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that you’re paying for that too Whitey. Don’t you feel culturally enriched?
his four daughters sleep on two single bunk beds in one room while his three sons share a single bunk bed in a separate room.
The family have a large big flat screen TV in the lounge with Sky HD box and the children have a TV and X-Box in their bedroom with multiple games.
You know? Just the basic necessities.
The entire family shares one bathroom, which they have to queue up to use.
Arnold, who is in the third year of an NHS funded mental health nursing degree, recently turned down a five bedroom house because there was a lack of storage .
He added: “There wasn’t space for the things of ten people, it didn’t even have a dining room.
Oh the humanity of it all. Have you ever heard such a moving tale? How does this brave family find the will to go on?
“I am remorseful over leaving France but not in the sense I regret it because I am doing my course.
I’m sure the British people are more “remorseful” that you left France, than you are.
“But we were living in a very beautiful home in France and sometimes they ask why we left our home there.”
Probably because you were in danger of dying in the brutal civil war in France and had to go to Britain in order to survive, just like all those lovely migrants in the Calais Jungle.
A spokesperson from Luton Borough Council said: “Despite difficulties we managed to find Mr and Mrs Sube affordable housing in Luton that is large enough to house them and their eight children.
But…but… Arnold said it isn’t large enough. Therefore you need to go back and find him a bigger house, which will satisfy his needs. If you can’t find one that already exists, then I suggest you hurry up and build one. You have to, or else you’re a racist.
“After a generous offer on our part, we have done our bit and if housing is offered and declined without, what we judge, good reason, then we will offer the property to another family.”
Probably not a white British family though I bet you. Maybe a Muslim family will be second on the list.
Councillor Michael Garrett added: “There are not many five bedroom council houses in Luton and they were lucky to be offered one.
“I haven’t got a lot of sympathy for them.”
No sane person would. But unfortunately, we don’t live in sane times. I can 100% guarantee that even though the vast majority of people will be disgusted by this story, that there will unfortunately be a small, but vocal minority of bleeding heart morons, who will sympathise with him, for some stupid reason.