All across the Western world, governments are at war with the ordinary people. Don’t be fooled into thinking that their disastrous and destructive decisions are the result of stupidity, cowardice in the face of political correctness, naive optimism, or whatever. Nobody is this incompetent for real. Nobody with even the slightest understanding of cause and effect would be making these insane decisions, with the expectation that they’ll actually work out well. No, what we are seeing is a deliberate and conscious decision to ruin the lives of the people that they are supposed to represent and protect. It is important that we all remember this fact, for if things ever start turning around, and they try to pretend that they always meant well. They’ll need to answer for their crimes against us.
A five-year-old Christian girl placed in foster care with a Muslim family has been ordered to go and live with her relatives.
Why was she not allowed to live with her relatives in the first place? Surely that would be the logical thing to do, if they really cared about the wellbeing of the child. Of course, we know damn well that they don’t care about the wellbeing of little white English girls at all. They’ve allowed untold thousands of them to be raped by Muslim men, and then they deliberately forced this child to live with a Muslim family, putting her at similar risk, rather than doing the sane thing and letting her live with relatives. Remember what I said already. Nobody is this incompetent. Any idiot would know that it would be better for a child to live with relatives if for whatever reason, they can’t live with their immediate family. This was deliberate.
The move follows reports that the young girl was being encouraged to speak Arabic in a foster family where English is rarely spoken.
Why are these people even in Britain? They’re not integrating. They choose their own language and culture over that of the country they immigrated to. How does Britain benefit from their presence?
The girl, whose identity is being protected, was reportedly taken to back to her grandmother’s after a judge ruled she should stop living with her current foster family.
Should have been brought to her grandmother’s in the first place.
According to The Times, the girl was being encouraged to abandon Christian traditions and values in favour of Muslim ones.
And of course we know that if the reverse happened, that being, if a Christian family tried to force convert a Muslim child, there would be outrage.
Tower Hamlets Council, the authority responsible for handling the girl’s foster care, denied that the family did not speak English.
A council spokesman said she had been placed in an ‘English-speaking family of mixed race’ and that there ‘inaccuracies’ in reports published.
Yes and we can trust the word of the British authorites. It’s not as if they ever lie at all, or ignore the wellbeing of children when it comes to dealing with the Muslim community. Well except for all the times when they do exactly that, of course.
Social services bosses at the council said staff have ‘always been working towards the child being looked after by a family member’.
Why does this even take any effort at all? Surely it’s just common sense that a child is in better hands with their own family, and this should be the default, rather than something to work towards. There’s no logical reason to hand a child over to a family of strangers, especially one of a vastly different cultural and racial background, unless the real aim was for the child to suffer.
‘We would like to give more details but we are legally restricted to do so,’ a council spokesman said in a statement.
“There are powerful people who don’t want us exposing the truth. Go back to your alcohol, your premier league football, and your Kardashians. You can trust us to make the important decisions, while you distract yourselves.”
‘Tower Hamlets Council has the welfare of children at the heart of what we do.
The decision to choose foster carers for a child is based on a number of factors including cultural background and proximity to promote contact with the child’s family and the child’s school in order to give them as much stability as possible.
“Cultural background is one of the factors we take into account.”
*Proceeds to send child to a family with a completely different cultural background.*
‘We have always been working towards the child being looked after by a family member and we continue to do so.’
Again let me ask, why is this something to “work towards”? Why isn’t it the default?
A spokesman for the Judicial Office said Judge Khatun Sapnara had re-examined the case at a family court hearing on Tuesday and decided she should live with her grandmother.
Too little, too late. The poor child has already suffered unnecessarily.
Bill Nye, an actor who became famous in the 1990s for pretending to be a scientist on some Disney channel show appeared on a panel a few months ago, to discuss climate change. The panel suggested that population growth is a significant factor in climate change, and that population control (perhaps taking the form of something akin to China’s “One child policy”), might be necessary in order to prevent catastrophic climate changes. However they only seem to advocate population control for one particular group of people, which will be blatantly obvious, once you watch the video.
Isn’t it interesting really, that most of the really out of control population growth is happening in the Third World currently? In most of the developed world however, birth rates are already falling below replacement level. Yet despite the fact that the developed world is already having less children than necessary just to maintain a steady and stable population level, Nye and his fellow panelists suggest that it is they specifically who need to have less children. Meanwhile, China and India between them have about one third of the entire global population, and are two of the biggest polluters of all, yet nobody is advocating population control for them. As usual, it’s only being pushed on white majority countries, most of which already have declining birth rates as it is.
And sure, we know exactly what will happen then. White majority countries will start having even less children. Suddenly, the media and political establishment will put out scaremongering stories about how we have an “aging population” and that we need a population increase, in order to keep the economy going. This will be used to justify for even more mass immigration from the third world, with the hopes of eventually making us minorities in our own ancestral homelands.
You see, they can’t realistically make the claim that the first world needs to curtail its population growth, in order to fight climate change, and at the same time claim that people in the first world aren’t having enough babies, so we need to bring more people from the third world into the first world, in order to offset a shrinking population. Yet this is exactly what they’re doing. If first world population growth was really causing climate change and therefore needed to be curtailed, it makes absolutely no sense to then start bringing more people into the first world from outside, where they’ll help contribute to the problem, but yet they do try to push both of these contradictory positions at the same time anyway.
This is because they want nothing less than the extermination and extinction of white people. They don’t give a damn about the environment, nor do they give a damn about the plight of people in the third world. They just really hate white people and will use any tactic in order to speed up our demise. Luckily enough, from reading the comments on the video, it seems that most people can see right through them.
The current President of Turkey (and wannabe Sultan of a new version of the Ottoman Empire) Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a man with a personality profile that would be considered too over the top and unbelievable as the basis for a James Bond villain…
… has come out and told ethnic Turks who are living in Europe to have five children rather than three (the amount usually encouraged within Turkey itself), so that they can “stake a claim for their rights” or some such bullshit in Europe.
President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has called on Turkish citizens living in Europe to have five children – two more than his usual calls to Turks in the homeland – in a bid to multiply their presence in the continent so that they will be the “future of Europe.”
Can it really get more obvious than that? He’s literally encouraging his own citizens to try and outbreed and eventually conquer the native Europeans in their own ancestral homelands. This is nothing new of course. Anyone who has any understanding of history that took place before the 1930s (so not many people really) will be well aware that Europe’s entire historical relationship with the Turks has been one of them attempting to conquer us, and us resisting these attempts.
They may very well have eventually succeeded in conquering the entire continent, if not for their defeat in the 1683 Battle of Vienna. After that defeat, the tide really started turning against them. They gradually started getting pushed out of Europe and North Africa in the 200 years or so following this, until by the outbreak of WW1, this is what was left of their empire.
However, people seem to have this belief that just because Europeans have no interest in colonialism and conquest anymore, that nobody else does either. The reality is that ever since Islam first came along 1400 years ago, it’s entire existence has been one of conquest and subjugation. The only problem for the once mighty Turks is that for the past few centuries, they’ve been too weak to take Europe on anymore. This doesn’t mean that they lost the will to conquer. They’ve just been waiting for the right opportunity to get started again, and now that Europe is so crippled with political correctness, white guilt, and below replacement level birth rates, they see that the opportunity has presented itself at last.
“I am calling out to my citizens, by brothers and sisters in Europe,” Erdoğan said at a rally in the Central Anatolian province of Eskişehir on March 17. “Have not just three but five children.”
“The place in which you are living and working is now your homeland and new motherland. Stake a claim to it. Open more businesses, enroll your children in better schools, make your family live in better neighborhoods, drive the best cars, live in the most beautiful houses,” he said. “That’s because you are the future of Europe. It will be the best answer to the vulgarism, antagonism, and injustice made against you.”
In case you’re wondering what he means by “vulgarism, antagonism, and injustice”, what he means is the expectation that European people have of them to stop acting like a bunch of primitive, violent, barbarian, savages, and actually contribute to society instead. How evil of us.
Erdoğan’s message comes amid ongoing political tension after Turkish ministers’ attempts to stage rallies with members of the Turkish community living in Europe were denied by some countries and after the European Court of Justice ruled to allow employers to ban workers from wearing visible religious symbols, including the headscarf.
And why exactly should Turkish citizens in Europe be allowed to stage political rallies for Turkey, on European streets? Would Turkey allow European people the same freedom in Turkey? He’s acting like a spoiled child whose mother told him he can’t have anymore sweets. In fairness, I blame the treacherous cunt, Angela Merkel, for giving into every one of his whims so far.
As for the headscarf thing, if an employer has a dress code, why should certain people be exempt because of their religion (the ban applies to all religions, not just Islam btw). If Islam is so important to them, then why not just stay in the backwards, Islamic hellhole they came from instead?
Slamming the decision known as the “headscarf ban,” Erdoğan said: “They are banning the headscarf. We are fed up. Where is the freedom of religion, freedom of conscience? Ban the kippa if you can. Can they [ban the kippa]?”
If you don’t like it then leave. Islam has no historical claim to the success or development of Europe. In fact, the entire history of Europe has been about keeping Islam out. The fact that you’re allowed to practice your religion in Europe at all, after more than a millennium of trying to conquer us and force it upon us, is a testament to how overly generous we really are. If the majority of people today had a proper understanding of our relationship with Turks, and indeed, Islam in general, we might be doing a lot more than just “banning headscarves”
He also claimed that the real reason behind the rising antagonism toward Turks in Europe was “the discomfort they feel as Turkey has become an independent country with its economy and situation in the world.”
“The Turkey they dream is a dependent country which they can order around,” he said. “They have no discomfort with the Turk who is a worker in the factory, but they cannot bear any Turk who becomes an owner, engineer or manager of this factory.”
No, the reason for any rising antagonism towards Turks in Europe is because they’ve failed to integrate into their host societies. In fact, Erdogan himself has outright told them not to. Native Europeans are getting sick and tired of having to deal with such a worthless and useless people. If they love Turkey so much, and would prefer to live under Turkish customs, rather than the customs of their host nations, then why not just do the obvious thing and return to Turkey? Well, the answer is quite simple. They’re engaged in a long term strategy of subverting and eventually conquering Europe, so they can remake it in Turkey’s image. They’ll never integrate. They’ll just play the long game until they have the numbers to force Europe to integrate with them. There are only two options here. Either they conquer Europe, or Europe forces them out. There is no peaceful third option.
The rest of the article isn’t really relevant, so I won’t be responding to it. Meanwhile, while Erdogan is calling for Turks to outbreed the European people, another Turkish minister is suggesting that there could be a “religious war” in Europe soon.
Europe will soon be the site of “religion wars,” Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said on March 16, in Ankara’s first comment on the general elections in the Netherlands that saw the victory of Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Liberal VVD.
“Now the election is over in the Netherlands … “When you look at the many parties you see there is no difference between the social democrats and fascist [Geert] Wilders. All have the same mentality. Where will you go? Where are you taking Europe? You have begun to collapse Europe. You are dragging Europe into the abyss. Holy wars will soon begin in Europe,” Çavuşoğlu said on March 16, in Ankara’s first comment on the general election in the Netherlands that saw the victory of Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s Liberal VVD.
“They killed each other 100 years ago because they were of different faiths,” he added, without elaborating.
“But they learned a lesson from this and then set up the European Union and the Council of Europe,” he added.
I would agree that Europe is beginning to collapse and is being dragged into the abyss. However, I don’t agree with his assessment as to why. This guy seems to think that the native Europeans are the ones with the problem, because after decades of pathetic deference, we’re finally saying enough is enough, and are standing up for our own interests. I, on the other hand, think the problem was that we were too generous and accommodating to these people. We should never have been so reckless in letting millions of them to immigrate to Europe like we did. The fact is, there would be no possibility of any “holy wars” breaking out in Europe, if we hadn’t allowed millions of these people in, in the first place.
Anyway, if you take these two articles together, they really paint a grim picture of the future. You’ve one article predicting a war of cultures, and in the other, you have the leading figure of the invading culture, encouraging his people to increase their numbers… most likely in preparation for this inevitable war. I’ll finish this post off with a video from “Black Pigeon Speaks”, in which he gives his thoughts on the situation facing us.
I’ve mentioned many times before (including in my most recent post) that a country is a reflection of the people who live there, not the other way around. What I mean by that, is that the country doesn’t make the people what they are, the people make the country what it is and so, when those people are moved to another country, they will have an effect on the new country, rather than than the new country changing them.
Now lets take a look at Somalia. There’s a reason this country is a poverty stricken, dangerous hellhole, and it isn’t because of colonialism, racist white people, voodoo curses, kryptonite, radioactive spider bites, or any other lame excuse that might be given to explain it. No, the reason why Somalia is the way it is, is because the people who live there are a bunch of feckless, lazy, violent, moronic, imbeciles, with an average IQ of 68… borderline retarded by first world standards. Moving hundreds of thousands, or even millions of these people to Europe, isn’t going to bring them up to European standards, and it certainly won’t be a boom to the European economies. Instead, they’re going to drag Europe down to Somalia’s standards, and that can be clearly seen, when reading this article.
“Somalia, Sudan, Libya,” – the names of countries patter begins to pour on the outskirts of Munich, Heidemanis street, located in the center of the approaches to meet migrants dark-skinned young men.
Isn’t it interesting how everyone is so focused on the Syrian civil war, that nobody is paying attention to every other country that people are coming from? I still have yet to see an explanation as to how Europe can possibly handle the influx of people coming in from what seems to be the entirety of the Middle East, South Asia, and Northern and Central Africa. We will be overrun eventually.
City outskirts, semi-industrial area, set up a reception center for migrant simultaneously accommodated about 1,200 people. Although after a few weeks, migrants from the center raised elsewhere, it is never empty.
And it never will be empty, because there’s no end in sight for this mass migration. They will keep on coming until Europe chooses to put an end to it. By the time the willpower exists to do that, it may already be too late.
On arrival at the center approaches impossible not to notice a bright blue painted and sprinkled with various inscriptions fence: looking at the white background of the winter very bright street art, between different people’s cultures and religions attributed to characters in the eye drops are repetitive inscription “Welcome”. It is in this greeting a few months ago the Germans greeted their country arrived in the overcrowded trains migrants from southern Europe.
Central approaches can be seen not only back and forth over by volunteers, but their destination have reached the migrants, who are from this center can go out and come back to it again in the security station to produce documents.
At first glance it seems that the majority roam around 18-30 years for men. These groups are attracted to public transport stations, from where travel to the city center or just go for a walk after the center approaches. In the city center through the half-open net rushing and one other family with children.
Yeah, we already know it’s mainly young men. Young men, who are supposedly fleeing from a civil war in Syria, while the women, children, and elderly, stay back home to fight it. Of course, we know the Syrian war narrative is a complete fabrication at this point, and most migrants aren’t coming from there, but you would think even people who are clueless to the fact that it’s mainly non-Syrians who are arriving in Europe, would at least wonder why it’s mainly men. Unfortunately, most people are asleep, and don’t think about the world, beyond whatever is happening on Coronation Street, or whatever Kim Kardashian is doing lately.
How then were able to learn certain premises populated center of the family, individually housed and single mothers with children, as well as separate facilities at the living men who arrived without families.
Part of the center supervisors – as well as non-ethnic Germans, and people who can communicate with the different sides arrived migrants and natives all cultural, religious or communication with foreigners characteristics.
English understands, but does not want to speak
Most agree the center of the migrants do not speak. Although often they obviously pay, or at least understand English, when asked whether she would accept a few minutes to talk, just shakes his head and pressure away.
True, there are those who agree to talk, but after seeing the work of a journalist’s license and are confident that this particular document, begins to smile shyly and say do not understand questions. Centre volunteers have also confirmed that the majority of migrants, at least a little English.
But sure they’ll be a boom to Germany’s economy in no time at all. They’ll be paying the pensions of retiring Germans, for decades to come.
The portal lrytas.lt women journalists met ten days ago to talk to the migrant reception center comes Abdulah, just asked to have reached Germany from Somalia, began brandishing hand to tell the smallest details of the trip.
He spoke broken English, regularly įpindamas and their native language words, so the long narrative was able to understand that the Somali boat he reached Italy and then took a train to Germany.
“He had to escape the brutal civil war in Italy.”
Seriously, does nobody else think this is insane? That uneducated and economically useless people from the third world, can just walk into Europe like this without doing so legally, and isn’t sent back straight away? How does this benefit Europe?
Laugh travel price
Asked whether this was an expensive trip, the guy replied that the cost is very high – up to eight thousand dollars. As soon as they heard this statement, his buddies, until all the questions atsakinėdavę “no english” throws voice kvatotis and fellow pat on the shoulder praising him for ingenuity.
“But they’re so poor and impoverished”.
“I come alone, but in Somalia remained in my family,” – continues even not ask the other person says and hints that he got only reached Germany immediately to his family reported that he is alive and healthy. Here again during the course of the conversation with curiosity the next circle of mocking laughter swept wave.
Abdulah Germany – yet only ten days, but already has a very big plans: “As soon as I get the German citizenship as soon as you bring your family here. Our family is not very big – only ten people. It’s my parents, brothers and sisters. Or maybe they will be able to enter the bus as much as before, “- he considered.
“As soon as I reached Germany, they immediately telephoned. They are very happy, “- smiling broadly Abdulah and his fortune friends, just heard about it, that called to the house in Somalia, once again he began to chuckle.
“Not a big family.”
Germany meanwhile has the lowest birth rate on the planet.
The Germans are well on their way to being ethnically cleansed and replaced.
But sure, that’s a good thing remember? The Jew politician told us so.
“People shouldn’t be judged based on the group they came from. Not all Muslims are terrorists. Not all gypsies are thieving, parasitic scum. Not all blacks are violent thugs. However, all ethnic Germans are Nazis, and are guilty of crimes committed 70 years ago, even if they weren’t born at the time.”
In Germany – not to work and live
Abdulah rushing to assure that it is sure to remain in Munich and will not take place anywhere from here, he likes the conditions. “Here I will be able to learn the German language, it’s got to do first,” – says a young man. But when asked what later would like to work in Germany, he smiles: “No, no … I like to walk in the mountains, but to work – not. I want to live in Germany. “
He doesn’t want to work in Germany. He just wants to live off German tax-payer funded welfare, like the worthless parasite that he is. You can be sure his friends with “no English”, feel the same way. Then when they bring their “small families of ten” to live in Germany with them, they’ll be equally as lazy and useless. Meanwhile, the Germans will be taxed into oblivion to pay for these wasters, and won’t be able to afford to start families of their own, because of the high cost of living. This is genocide, no matter how they might try and dress it up.
Also, can you see what I mean now about blaming the Somali people themselves for Somalia being a failed state? How could anyone expect the country to be in any other state than what it is, if this is the caliber of people who live there?
Heidemanis street migrants can spend up to eight weeks. It heard Abdulah pretend that this information is new to him: “No, they promised me that I have lived here. Only eight weeks? We are here to stay forever. “
A parasite doesn’t leave it’s host willingly.
“We love Germany”
Heidemanis street in the center of migrant arrivals can live, here they are fed, they are advised to attend an intensive German language course, provided free of charge to doctors, as well as dental services.
Newcomers are provided with clothing, they are provided, and various other forms of assistance.
Nothing is for free. German tax-payers are paying for these services.
Winter – no problem, the Germans made sure that we make up. There are very good people, we like them a lot, “- said the guy showing his down jacket. The conversation still trying to interfere with his fortune friends smiling broadly kept repeating that they really like in Germany.
Yes, I’m sure they do really like their benefactors. In much the same way Anna Nicole Smith really loved her 90 year old billionaire husband, for the year she was married to him before inheriting his fortune.
“We love Germany” – an enthusiastic thumbs-up raised Abdulah friends goodbye and went their own ways.
It’s pretty sad isn’t it? As I said, the average IQ in Somalia is 68, yet in this case, the Germans are the ones being outwitted in this relationship. But that’s political correctness for you. Certain obvious realities have to be denied, in case it’s offensive. And so, the Germans are doomed to subsidise the lives of parasites like these until they finally go extinct, all to avoid being called mean names like “racist” if they dare to resist.
Vile racist Rezzas Abdulla spat in a baby’s face and told her shocked mum “white people shouldn’t breed” in a disgraceful street attack.
But it’s just a conspiracy theory of course when people like myself claim that there is a deliberate agenda to see white people go extinct, with policies such as multiculturalism being put in place as a means to that end. Yep, just a crazy conspiracy theory.
Hairdresser Rebecca Telford was wheeling nine-month-old Layla-Jean through South Shields when Abdulla launched the unprovoked afternoon assault, leaning into her pushchair to spit on her.
The little girl was left covered in saliva, which sprayed across her face in the disgusting attack.
A nine-month-old child was spat on simply for being born white in a predominately white country. Remind me again, what are the benefits to this seemingly failing multicultural experiment, and in what way do these alleged benefits compensate for incidents like this?
A court heard Abdulla has previous for race hate offences and has “a problem with white women”.
And yet he willingly chooses to live in a white majority country, rather than back in whichever Islamic shithole he, or his parents (if he was born in Britain himself), originally came from. Why is that? If they hate white people so much, why do they choose to live in a country full of white people?
As I’ve always said before, a country’s living standards and cultural values, is entirely a reflection of the population who inhabit and run it, not the other way around. Look at North America for example. Canada and the United States were built by, and still today, are inhabited by people of European descent (ie, White people) and these countries enjoy first world living standards, much like Europe does. Mexico on the other hand trails far behind those two countries, despite being in the same part of the world. It’s not as if there’s some kind of magical force that only extends as far as the Mexican border, which allows these countries to have first world living standards. The only difference is the people who control these countries.
Then, there is Australia and New Zealand, also inhabited by white majorities, which also enjoy first world living standards, similar to those of Europe, Canada, and the United States. Apartheid era South Africa and Rhodesia were also built by white people and they too, enjoyed first world living standards, and on a continent filled with economic and political basket cases, no less. Now, under black majority rule, Zimbabwe is a joke of a country, and South Africa (while still functioning for the most part at this point) is well on itsway to becominga failedstate itself. Just really think about all this, and put aside any politically correct biases you might feel. I think if you look at it with an open mind, the conclusion is obvious.
But now the 33-year-old, who has some mental health issues, has walked free from Newcastle Crown Court on a suspended prison sentence.
Oh what a surprise. The great mental health crisis that only seems to effect Muslims in Europe, and only seems to cause them to target European people, strikes again. I guess at least this time nobody was killed for a change.
Miss Telford told police in a victim impact statement: “I am completely disgusted and distressed that a grown man, regardless of race or religion, would spit on a defenceless baby in a completely unprovoked attack.
You’re not the only one. My blood was boiling when I read this story.
“If he had just walked by I would not have even noticed him, there was no eye contact and no words had been exchanged. I had never seen him before.
“I believe he spat on her purely because we are white, I was a lone female and an easy target.”
Gee, how did you come to that conclusion? Did it have anything to do with the fact that he specifically said that “white people shouldn’t breed” after doing it?
The court heard the mother and baby were heading down Chichester Road, in South Shields, last January when they had to misfortune to encounter Abdulla, who approached without warning.
Prosecutor Emma Dowling said: “He leant into the pushchair and spat into the face of her daughter.
“As he did so, he shouted or said ‘white people shouldn’t breed’ then walked off.”
The court heard when the baby’s stunned mother confronted Abdulla, he told her to “shut the **** up” and walked off.
How did Britain ever survive in the days before multiculturalism? I can’t believe the racist Brits ever voted “Yes” in the Brexit referendum, primarily due to dissatisfaction with immigration policies, when I read stories like this one.
A shocked passer-by gave Ms Telford a tissue to clean the saliva off the child’s face.
Was there no passer by around who was willing to punch this piece of shit in the face for what he did? I’m not a violent person myself, but if I had seen something like this happen, I’d have made an exception.
The mum attempted to take a picture of her baby’s attacker as he walked away but was too shaken by what had happened.
Layla-Jean was taken to the doctor after the attack for tests.
Makes sense. You never know what kind of diseases this filthy animal could have been carrying.
Abdulla, of Imeary Street, South Shields, who has two previous convictions for race-hate offences on white females, was later tracked down through CCTV.
He was found guilty of racially aggravated common assault after a trial at South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court, which he did not attend.
He was given eight months suspended for 18 months, with rehabilitation and mental health treatment requirements.
Imagine that. Two previous convictions for similar crimes in the past, and this time his target was a nine-month-old baby… and all he gets is a suspended sentence. Is it any wonder that people are losing faith in the justice system? Perfectly in line with the goals of Cultural Marxism.
Sentencing him, Recorder Darren Preston said: “There is something viscerally horrible and disgusting about spitting at someone, particularly in the face and to do so to a baby was particularly disgusting, let alone, to make things even worse, when your motivation for doing so is racial hatred.
But not horrible enough to put the piece of shit in prison apparently.
“You have got a problem, it seems to me, with white women.”
Yeah, how did you figure that one out?
The court heard after the attack last January, Abdulla spent time, between July and September, receiving psychiatric treatment in hospital, which has continued after his release into the community.
Such valuable contributions. A mentally ill hater of white people, who is somehow allowed to live in a country that was built by white people. In a sane world, he never would have been allowed into Britain in the first place.
The judge said Abdulla’s deteriorating mental health at the time of the attack contributed towards the offence.
Recorder Preston added that society would be better served by Abdulla being allowed to continue his psychiatric treatment.
Society would be better served if he was deported back to wherever he came from.
Vic Laffey, mitigating, said medical evidence shows Abdulla’s mental health was deteriorating in the six months leading to his hospital admission with schizophrenia last summer and he now receives anti-psychotic treatment in the community.
Probably paid for by British tax-payers, the majority of whom, would be white. Aren’t they so privileged to be white?
Mr Laffey added: “The suggests he was ill, or becoming ill, at the time this offence was committed.
“He is clearly vulnerable himself, he has significant support from his family and is making progress.”
He’s the real victim here, apparently. It’s not his fault that he hates white people so much. His mental illness, combined with the fact that he’s surrounded by white people, is what caused him to lash out. He needs our sympathy, not the child.
I often tell myself that when it comes to Sweden, nothing can surprise me anymore. Yet they always manage to do so anyway. This latest story from my favourite country of self-genociding lunatics, is so ridiculous, that it’s almost impossible to comprehend that this isn’t a story from The Onion. This is peak Sweden.
Allan Widman, chairman of the Swedish parliamentary defense committee, demands that individuals are prohibited from wearing bulletproof vests to protect themselves from the increasing violence, which he believes will increase further without a ban, reports Sydsvenskan.
You just gotta love the logic this guy is using. The Swedish government has imported a huge number of hostile and incompatible people and forced their native population to live alongside them. These hostile and incompatible people have caused violence to increase in Sweden, leading to people being forced to buy bulletproof vests to protect themselves from this increase in violence. This idiot then comes to the conclusion that bulletproof vests will make the violence worse, and decides that the solution to the problem is to ban their purchase, rather than putting a stop to immigration of the sort of people who are committing the violence in the first place, thus leaving the native people defenceless.
And people actually laughed at me in the past when I made the claim that Sweden is trying to exterminate it’s own population.
Widman has written a bill to the parliament in which he demands that it should be illegal and punishable for individuals to wear body armor – which is classified as military equipment – in the public place.
I really have no words to respond here.
The reason for this is that many young criminals wear bulletproof vests, and Widman believes that that the protective vests contribute to escalate the level of violence in the Swedish society – and that a ban could lower it.
So because young criminals (allegedly) wear bulletproof vests, no law abiding person is allowed to wear them anymore. As if a criminal is suddenly going to stop wearing them because they’re illegal. What an idiotic concept, expecting a criminal not to do something, once it’s made illegal.
This is purely about leaving the ordinary people defenceless. I understand that it’s difficult to comprehend the idea of a government in a first world, Western democracy, deliberately working to exterminate it’s own population, because it seems like a really crazy idea, but that really is what’s happening here.
– I believe that the sense of personal security that wearing armor gives, helps to lower the threshold for the use of serious violence, he says.
No actual evidence needed to support his claim. He just makes a claim based on his feelings on the matter and as a result, terrified, ordinary people are at risk of getting killed because of his decision.
Just a few weeks ago, a bulletproof vest probably saved the life of a 18-year-old in Malmö, and more people, not just criminals, buy and wear bulletproof vests in the increasingly tougher Swedish society, where bullets some times fly right beside hand grenades.
Literally giving an example of a young life that could have been lost, if this ban had already been in place. How many unnecessary lives will be lost in the future, if it does come into effect?
But now the Swedes better take cover and hope that they have very robust skin.
Or maybe, they should stop being so politically correct, and actually vote for a party that will put an end to this mass immigration, and start deporting those who are already there. It’s either that, or just lay down and die. There are no other options.
Arnold Mballe Sube and his wife Jeanne, both 33, share a three-bedroom council house with their eight kids.
Only 33 years old, and he already has 8 kids. He’ll probably have doubled that number by the time his wife hits the menopause.
Typically in Africa, it was normal to have large families because few children survived until adulthood. Therefore it made sense from an evolutionary perspective to have more kids in the hopes that at least a few of them would survive. This is called “r selection breeding strategy”, whereas Europeans tend to favour a “K-selection strategy”. Since 1950 however, European medicine and financial aid has improved life expectancy in Africa, so most kids aren’t dying before reaching adulthood anymore. Their breeding patterns however have remained the same , as if most of their children still died before reaching adulthood, not just in Africa, but everywhere they migrate to. In 1950, the African population was approximately 200 Million. By 2100, it’s projected to be 4.2 Billion. That’s 21 times the population size in just 150 years. That means that by 2250, if current trends continue, there will 88.2 Billion people in Africa, unless they either start breeding like Europeans, or some major Malthusian catastrophe occurs. I’m leaning more towards the latter being most likely myself.
But the couple say they need at least six doubles for them to be comfortable.
Your comfort is irrelevant you ungrateful bastard. Why should the British taxpayers foot the bill for your inability to use contraception?
They claim the living conditions are “terrible” but turned down a larger home because of a lack of storage space.
Those “terrible conditions” are far better than the conditions you would be living under if you were back in Africa living under the living standards that exist in every single black run country on the planet. You should be grateful that you were given the opportunity to live in not one, but two first world countries, something your own racial demographic has consistently failed to replicate.
Student Arnold, 33, said: “Me and my family have been neglected. It’s so cramped and the conditions are terrible.
The guy is a student. Let that sink in. He isn’t even in a position where he can support himself, yet he has a wife and eight kids (so far), and expects the British taxpayers to pick up the slack for him, and to top it all off, he isn’t even a British citizen himself. He’s a worthless parasite. This is exactly what I meant before about white genocide. We have a system in which we tax the indigenous white populations of Europe into oblivion to the point where they can’t afford to have children themselves, and redistribute these taxes to help non-white people like this parasite, to outbreed us in our own countries.
At the same time that all this is happening, our elites and our media have the cheek to tell us that immigration is necessary to offset demographic collapse because we aren’t having enough children ourselves to keep our population stable, even though they’ve deliberately created a system which discourages us from doing so. Mass third world immigration isn’t the solution to the demographic crisis. Rather, it’s one of the causes of it, and the people in power know this because it’s a deliberate policy to ethnically cleanse and replace us. If maintaining a stable population level was really the goal, then it would be very easy to increase the birth rate in European people if the money that is being used to support the fake migrant crisis was instead used to support the growth of European families instead. Europeans want to have more children, so that isn’t the issue. The issue is that our elites are deliberately trying to suppress our birth rates and increase those of other groups who they want to replace us.
“Everyone is sleeping everywhere and my wife is sleeping with the baby so I am on the sofa.
“I am homeless in my home now.
“My children are finding it difficult. We can’t eat as a family, we all have to eat in different parts of the house.
“The area is the worst area I have ever lived in my life. This is the worst house.”
Nobody cares. You still have a better quality of life than you deserve, in regards to how productive you are.
Arnold and full-time mum Jeanne moved from France in 2012 so that he could study mental health nursing at the University of Bedfordshire.
His children are eldest daughter Mejane, 16, Fabian, 13, Analia, 13, ten-year old Prosper, nine-year-old Dylan, six-year-old twins Sharon and Stacy and three-week-old Mary.
So he already had seven of his eight children when he decided to just up and leave France to become a full-time student instead. This is such irresponsible behaviour on his part. If he wanted to study so badly, either his wife should have taken up a job to support him, or he should have kept working, and studied part-time instead. Can you imagine what must go through a person’s head who thinks it’s perfectly acceptable to give up his job to study, when he has seven kids and a non-working wife to support? Only a selfish entitled bastard who expects everyone else to fund his lifestyle would have the audacity to do this. Most other people would have more self respect.
Luton Borough Council housed the family in a temporary hotel for almost four months before they moved to their current property.
Probably cost them a fortune too. Don’t worry whitey, your taxes are being well spent.
The three-bedroom end-terraced house where they currently live in Bletchley, Bucks., costs £1,278 per month.
Don’t worry whitey, your taxes are paying for that too. It’s worth it because this genius will eventually qualify as a mental health nurse. It’s an investment.
This is fully covered by Luton Borough Council – costing the taxpayer £15,000 a year in rent.
Money well spent. Who needs to fund the NHS, when we can spend it on wonderful investments like this instead?
Arnold claims the property is not suitable and he says he has enlisted the help of solicitors to help get him the house he wants.
Gee, I wonder how he can afford those solicitors when he isn’t working. I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that you’re paying for that too Whitey. Don’t you feel culturally enriched?
his four daughters sleep on two single bunk beds in one room while his three sons share a single bunk bed in a separate room.
The family have a large big flat screen TV in the lounge with Sky HD box and the children have a TV and X-Box in their bedroom with multiple games.
You know? Just the basic necessities.
The entire family shares one bathroom, which they have to queue up to use.
Arnold, who is in the third year of an NHS funded mental health nursing degree, recently turned down a five bedroom house because there was a lack of storage .
He added: “There wasn’t space for the things of ten people, it didn’t even have a dining room.
Oh the humanity of it all. Have you ever heard such a moving tale? How does this brave family find the will to go on?
“I am remorseful over leaving France but not in the sense I regret it because I am doing my course.
I’m sure the British people are more “remorseful” that you left France, than you are.
“But we were living in a very beautiful home in France and sometimes they ask why we left our home there.”
Probably because you were in danger of dying in the brutal civil war in France and had to go to Britain in order to survive, just like all those lovely migrants in the Calais Jungle.
A spokesperson from Luton Borough Council said: “Despite difficulties we managed to find Mr and Mrs Sube affordable housing in Luton that is large enough to house them and their eight children.
But…but… Arnold said it isn’t large enough. Therefore you need to go back and find him a bigger house, which will satisfy his needs. If you can’t find one that already exists, then I suggest you hurry up and build one. You have to, or else you’re a racist.
“After a generous offer on our part, we have done our bit and if housing is offered and declined without, what we judge, good reason, then we will offer the property to another family.”
Probably not a white British family though I bet you. Maybe a Muslim family will be second on the list.
Councillor Michael Garrett added: “There are not many five bedroom council houses in Luton and they were lucky to be offered one.
“I haven’t got a lot of sympathy for them.”
No sane person would. But unfortunately, we don’t live in sane times. I can 100% guarantee that even though the vast majority of people will be disgusted by this story, that there will unfortunately be a small, but vocal minority of bleeding heart morons, who will sympathise with him, for some stupid reason.
In the soon to be Zimbabwe part 2 (or South Africa as it’s currently known) a massive bitch by the name of Gillian Schutte has decided to virtue signal about how all white people are racist apparently, and that the only way to do away with racism entirely is to “do away with whiteness”. The fact that she’s white herself never seems to cross her mind or impact on her logic in anyway.
“I agree with the position of the radical Black youth of today’s struggle against whiteness. Why should they point out the ‘good whites’ or even be cognizant of the possibility that ‘not all whites are racist’,” Schutte said.
“I agree with the position of the radical white youth of today’s struggle against blackness. Why should they point out the ‘good blacks’ or even be cognizant of the possibility that ‘not all blacks are racist’,” Schutte said.
“I agree with the position of the radical secular youth of today’s struggle against Muslims. Why should they point out the ‘good Muslims’ or even be cognizant of the possibility that ‘not all Muslims are terrorists’,” Schutte said.
“I agree with the position of the radical Christian youth of today’s struggle against homosexuality. Why should they point out the ‘good gays’ or even be cognizant of the possibility that ‘not all gays are sexual deviants’,” Schutte said.
^See how bad this really sounds?
Schutte says “all whites are racist by virtue of their birth into a system of privilege based on a false construct of race, thus I say all whites are racist until whiteness is defunct”.
“Race is a false construct”
“All white people are racist”
How can all white people be racist when there is no such thing as a white race?
The activist said the only “race struggle” white people should be engaging in was the obliteration of the whiteness they were supposedly born into.
Yes white people, you don’t deserve to take any pride in your own racial heritage. It’s perfectly ok for blacks, Asians, Hispanics etc, to have racial solidarity and pride, but you don’t deserve that because your race (which doesn’t exist) is genetically evil.
“The only race struggle whites should engage in is to obliterate the whiteness they are born into … with no expectation of ‘exceptionalism’ or accolades for being a good white. As Noel Ignatiev has written – the point is not to interpret whiteness but to abolish it. Why should the neurosis of whiteness become a black person’s problem?”
Noel Ignatiev, just to remind you, was this guy here.
Meanwhile, while the Jew professor is talking about abolishing “whiteness” to prevent racism, his own ethnic kin in Israel are using DNA tests to decide who is Jewish (which is strange, because they’re only supposed to be a religion, not a race) and are sterilising black people, so they can’t reproduce and change the ethnic makeup of the country. I wonder why such a proud advocate for racial equality isn’t speaking out against the behaviour of his fellow Jews in Israel? If I didn’t know better, I would say that there is a double standard that exists for racism with white people getting picked on unfairly.
She claimed racism was found in what people did not do, thus, “the blank spaces of inaction [allegedly by “good whites”] is where the truth is found”.
It’s not enough to simply not act in a racist manner towards black people. We have to go out of our way to do more and more for them, or else we’re still racist. Instead of just getting on with our own lives in peace, and allowing them to do the same, we have to fight their battles for them, because they are helpless children who can’t do anything for themselves. We live to serve their interests and needs first and foremost.
Oh but they’re also completely equal to us in every way despite needing us to do everything for them.
“What use are good whites anyway, when 22 years later nothing much has changed for the majority of black people in SA?
Might want to blame the incompetent black morons who took control of the country the past 22 years then. They’re the majority group, and they’re the ones in power, yet they’re trying to blame white people for how things haven’t improved for black people in the country. How can it be the fault of white people, when they’re not the ones in power anymore? Why not just accept responsibility for the fact that your own people are at fault. It’s no coincidence that every single black run country (including ones that were once successful under white leadership, such as Haiti and Zimbabwe), are all failed third world hellholes. South Africa is already headingdown the same path. They can’t even maintain their powergrid, that’s how incompetent they are. But instead of accepting responsibility for their own failures, they have to try and blame it on white people.
What did the good white syndrome do to change the systemic nature of racism?
No information about this “systemic nature of racism” such as examples, or how it works. It’s just a baseless accusation.
Good whites will even learn the words to struggle songs and toyi toyi next to the oppressed – but will they give up their positions for the sake of transformation?”
What positions? Do you mean their jobs? Their homes? What exactly are you referring to? And why should they have to give anything up just to prove they aren’t racist to people who will just hate them no matter what? If they worked hard or made sacrifices to get somewhere, or even if they inherited a position of advantage from parents who did the same, why should they have to give anything up? People shouldn’t have to feel guilty about their successes.
As usual, she received a serious tongue lashing from some of her Facebook followers.
At least there’s some hope. I think we hit peak white guilt a while ago. At this point, white people are getting sick of being blamed for everyone else’s problems and failures, and every single wrong in the world. They whined too much and in doing so, have exhausted any good will and sympathy they might have once generated.
Azaad Hayat argued: “So, in the same vein of your broadening the parameters of the definition of being racist, all Jews in Israel are Zionists by virtue of their benefiting from the status quo.
I always love when the hypocrisy of the self proclaimed “chosen ones” is pointed out.
All the silent non-Nazi Germans were, similarly, Nazis during that horrendous reign…….and on and on we can go generalising and placing people into large, little categories. You are very adept at promoting racism.”
She is indeed, though she probably doesn’t see it that way, because I’m guessing she’s one of those people who believe:
“racism requires power plus prejudice. A black person can have prejudice towards white people, but they don’t have the institutional power to be racist.”
Despite the fact that in South Africa, black people do hold all the power. Plus, even if you do buy into that nonsense about racism requiring power, otherwise it’s just simply prejudice, it doesn’t explain why prejudice is not a big deal. It’s still bad.
Schutte responded: “Yes absolutely … no self-respecting Jew should have anything to do with Israel. Americans should be much more defiant against the use of drones and heinous US foreign policy too.”
Well that’s refreshing. Something I can agree with. Though it probably wasn’t the smartest thing to say. unless she’s secretly an ethnic Jew herself, I don’t think they’ll take too kindly to her saying such things.
Schutte made international headlines after exposing Judge Mabel Jansen’s views on black people being rapists last month. Jansen came under fire for saying rape was part of “black men’s culture”. She made the comments in a private conversation with Schutte‚ who is a liberal journalist and filmmaker.
Wow how could this judge make such horrible comments?
Now of course, those statistics are from America, but I can’ help but wonder if there are similar problems in South Africa, and that is where the judge’s comments are coming from. Plus I would assume that being a judge, she has probably dealt with many different criminal cases, and she might have noticed a pattern emerging regarding certain types of crimes and the demographics which commit them. Of course, observable reality doesn’t matter to people like Gillian Schutte. All that matters is the narrative, and the narrative this woman wants to push is one of white racism against black people in South Africa. People like her are sick as far as I’m concerned.
So apparently male grizzly bears have in recent times been venturing out of their native territories and been heading north to mate with female polar bears. Instead of celebrating the vibrant diversity, racist scientists are suggesting that this is a negative thing for the polar bear population.
BARROW, Alaska — Most Alaskans and Canadians have a bear story — tales of fearsome grizzlies, even polar bears. But a mix of the two?
They’re known as pizzlies or grolars, and they’re a fusion of the Arctic white bear and their brown cousins. It’s a blend that’s been turning up more and more in parts of Alaska and Western Canada.
Last week, a strange-looking bear was shot by a hunter in Nunavut, a remote territory that curves around Canada’s Hudson Bay. Its head was large, like a grizzly’s, but its fur was white. The bear’s genetics were not tested, but Arctic researchers seem unified in their analysis: It’s a polar-grizzly mix. A hybrid.
I don’t know how they could possibly tell, when differences are all just social constructs that were arbitrarily invented in order to justify discrimination against grizzly bears for absolutely no reason.
Textbooks say these two species aren’t supposed to inhabit the same environments. Polar bears are marine mammals; grizzlies are terrestrial. But as the Arctic warms, sea ice is shrinking and the tundra is expanding. And the bears’ disparate populations are meeting, mating and creating a new breed that’s capable of reproducing.
Diversity is the Arctic’s greatest strength.
Those grizzly bears are enriching polar bear culture.
Eventually, those grizzlies will integrate and will adopt polar bear behaviour as their own.
Bears sharing both species’ DNA have been recorded several times over the past decade. So why are these two species linking up?
It’s called flexible mate choice: The bears are mating with the best possible partners as opposed to not mating at all, and they’re mating because they share relatively close territories and the same branches of the same evolutionary tree.
Intraspecies mixing between the two happened thousands of years ago, thanks to the advance and retreat of glaciers, and of late, it has been boosted by climate change. Scientists say it’s also probably been assisted by policies that protect both bears from culling and hunting, affording further opportunities for mingling.
The crossbreeds found in Alaska and Canada are not genetic anomalies. Scientists have found the mix in the islands off Southeast Alaska, where bears resemble grizzlies but contain polar bear DNA. That indicates decades of sporadic interbreeding, said Steven Amstrup, chief scientist at Polar Bears International.
And that’s a good thing. Bear diversity is the best thing in the world for polar bears. And of course, we all know that the true definition of diversity means mixing polar bears out of existence.
The polar-grizzly cocktail is also far from the only recent animal hybrid. The coywolf — a coyote-dog-wolf amalgamation — and a lynx-bobcat mix have been popping up along the northern Atlantic coast. The more scientists analyze species’ genomes, the more they realize that animals we label as “pure breeds” actually share DNA — and that includes us.
Many humans carry traces of DNA from Neanderthals, which means we’re all hybrids. It also means there’s no such thing as genetic purity. The concept is a romantic construct, an anthropomorphized take on nature. And what may be most surprising about this, researchers say, is the role interbreeding plays in the futures of endangered species — or, as the case may be with polar bears, accelerating their end.
So they literally outright admitted it. That grizzly bears moving into polar bear territory and interbreeding with them, will inevitably end in the destruction of polar bears as a unique group. Sure, their genetics will be passed on to their hybrid descendants, but there will not be any more actual polar bears in the future if this keeps up.
Amstrup has studied bears in the Arctic since the 1970s and was instrumental in helping list the polar bear as a threatened species in 2008. He, like other experts, characterizes this “new” bear relationship as more beneficial to grizzlies than polar bears. That’s because there are more grizzlies than polar bears and because grizzly territory is expanding while polar bear territory is contracting. What that adds up to is a good chance grizzlies could essentially dilute the polar bear population until it doesn’t exist at all, they say.
Replace the words “polar ” with “white”, “bear” with “people”, and “grizzlies” with “non-white”, and you’ll get the point I’m trying to make by posting this article (just in case it wasn’t obvious already).
Polar bears are getting the short end of the stick in this relationship, not “gaining any genetic diversity,” said Geoff York, who led research on polar bears at the World Wildlife Fund for almost a decade before joining Amstrup at PBI.
Andrew Derocher, a professor of biological studies at the University of Alberta, has spent three decades studying bears throughout the Arctic. He, too, has a sobering view about where the hybridization is heading.
“I hate to say it, but from a genetic perspective, it’s quite likely grizzly bears will eat polar bears up, genetically,” he told me. And he says the changes are already at play.
Again, the polar bears will eventually cease to exist as a distinct bear because their genetic distinctiveness will be overwhelmed by grizzly DNA.
All hybrids that have been analyzed had grizzly fathers, because grizzly males roam to establish territory and come in contact with receptive female polar bears. Female grizzlies tend not to stray far from their home ranges, and male polar bears don’t usually creep into grizzly habitats.
Exactly like what is happening in Europe right now. Just as how its male grizzlies migrating to polar bear territory and mating with female polar bears, it is almost entirely young men who are migrating to Europe from Africa and the Middle East using this fake refugee crisis as an excuse to do so. And then the primary victims of their sexual crimes are white European girls and women, many of whom are actually welcoming these men into their countries with open arms.
Polar bears need the ice — that’s where the seals and walruses they eat live. They don’t hibernate, and they don’t travel south of the tundra. Grizzlies, historically, rarely ventured north of the treeline. Permafrost is too cold for their liking, and they sink into the snow easily. (Polar bears have padded paws that act as snowshoes). Hunting is more challenging in the north, where prey is scarce. They’re not really swimmers.
But shifts are afoot.
“What we’re starting to see in the Canadian Arctic is three-fourth grizzlies,” Derocher said, referring to the offspring of 50-50 hybrids that then mated with grizzlies. “How do they act? Probably more like grizzly bears, living on land. As climate change continues, terrestrial habitat is going to increase, and the likelihood is the habitat for grizzlies, a terrestrial bear, is going to get better. That means a longer warming period and greater food potential.”
Derocher said it will not be long before we start seeing female grizzlies bump into male polar bears, further straining the polar bear’s genetic variation. “I suspect at the same time that that’s occurring, we’ll start to see polar bears on their way out.”
Again I think the point needs to be emphasised. They’re saying exactly what the future holds for polar bears if this continues… their extinction. It’s exactly what is happening to us as a distinct racial group, except it’s not permitted to be spoken about because apparently, speaking out against our own demographic destruction is “racist” and “white supremacist”.
Now again, I just want to make it quite clear that I don’t believe that white people should have supremacy over any other racial group. Nor do I hold any hatred towards other races, just because they’re different. I simply believe that all races, all ethnic groups have a right to exist, and a right to preserve what makes them unique. I value true diversity, not this ridiculous fake diversity that inevitably results in breeding us out of existence in the lands that our ancestors built for us. I don’t see anything wrong or evil about speaking out against our own extinction any more than any other racial group doing the same thing.
When will that be? Impossible to say, but some experts think that as the Arctic continues warming, it may be only a few decades, perhaps a century. There are about 20,000 to 25,000 polar bears in the Circumpolar Arctic, and “an order of magnitude higher for grizzlies in that area” and other brown bears, Derocher said. “It shouldn’t be a big surprise that grizzlies are moving north — everything is.”
So there are essentially 10 times as many grizzlies as there are polar bears and it’s expected that this will result in the demographic replacement of polars with grizzlies over time. Lets look at the global population of humans by race (keeping in mind that most non-whites want to move to white countries, because they’re usually the best ones to live in).
Right now, polar bears are also threatened by polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, and other toxic pollution — primarily from eating seals and other animals affected by these carcinogens — that has been linked to brain damage, even causing some bears’ baculums, or penis bones, to break off.
And those outcomes could affect polar-grizzly hybrids as badly as pure breeds. No matter what bear ends up as the Arctic’s future apex predator, scientists say, if the issues up north aren’t solved, it won’t matter what bears are there.
Hybrids are “a normal part of the evolutionary process,” Derocher said. But if the ice disappears, “we won’t have grizzlies or polar bears in this area. If you roll the clock ahead another number of decades or a century, quite clearly it’s going to be no bears eventually.”
Yeah and I’m sure there’ll be no humans eventually too if things continue down the path we’re going. Western civilisation has been at forefront of all human development, and western civilisation is inextricably linked with the the European people. If we go extinct, I just can’t see humanity continuing to develop.
But of course, that’s just racist to suggest, because we’re all 100% equal in every way, and it doesn’t matter if we cease to exist. -_-
Let’s face it: Britain has an ethnic problem. Its patchwork of peoples, once the envy of the world, has become frayed, its harmony devolving into anger and xenophobia. And, we should be honest, the problem is rooted in one ethnic group – one large but troubled people who are failing to integrate into modern postindustrial society.
Hmm, I wonder which group could be failing to integrate.
While some of its more ambitious members have found success in politics and business, this community is falling behind educationally and economically as a whole, self-segregating into ethnic enclaves, becoming increasingly prone to violence, rioting and substance abuse. More troubling, in recent years they have begun to vote for ethnic extremist parties that threaten to undermine basic British values.
Sounds like the above group alright.
Who are these people? The English. Once a tolerant, welcoming people who thrived in scholarship and commerce, they have become a drag on British society.
Wow so according to this guy, the English people are somehow wrong for pursuing their own ethnic interests in the land that they and their ancestors built, and which they are indigenous to. What kind of fucked up logic is that?
They have become Britain’s problem group. Government figures show that “white English” students are now outperformed in school results by British children of Bangladeshi, Ghanaian, Indian, Sierra Leonean, Chinese, Sri Lankan, Vietnamese and Nigerian ancestry.
The link above just goes to an old Guardian article which states that these Ethnic groups are apparently outperforming British kids in school. The actual report isn’t shown, so I can neither confirm or deny how accurate this is.
This was not always the case: A decade ago, it seemed as if Britons with darker skin colours were trapped behind the English in education and income. But it’s all changed: In 2009, Bangladeshi-British kids soared ahead of the English; black African kids caught up with them in 2010 and Pakistani kids are on course to pass them this year.
Well extra help from private tutors definitely pays dividends.
Unlike the island’s other ethnic groups, low-income members of the English community seem determined to stay poor and uneducated. Britain’s Department of Education has published figures listing how many low-income children achieved passing grades in secondary school in 2012. Sixty per cent of black African and Bangladeshi students did, about half of Pakistanis and black Caribbean kids did, 40 per cent of Indians did – and only three in 10 “white British” (mainly English) kids did, putting them at the bottom of the list.
Again, he doesn’t actually link to the report itself, so we can’t confirm if those figures are accurate or not. Although I would like to point out that it’s interesting how he’s only comparing the poorest members of each ethnic group to each other. I wonder why he doesn’t compare each ethnic group as a whole to each other, to find out the percentages that pass then. It’s very misleading to write an article complaining about all English people, when he only talks about an alleged issue with the poorest of them.
On top of this – or perhaps because of it – the English are now self-segregating into isolated, and sometimes impoverished, uni-ethnic enclaves. Some 600,000 white English people moved out of the mixed-ethnicity districts of London between 2001 and 2011 for less integrated areas, while other ethnic groups moved into areas of higher diversity.
“HOW DARE THESE ENGLISH PEOPLE WANT TO LIVE WITH OTHER PEOPLE JUST LIKE THEMSELVES!!!”
If so many people are desperately fleeing diversity, then is that not a sign that it isn’t a good thing? You can be sure that this prick probably doesn’t live in a very diverse neighbourhood himself, all while he lectures others for trying to do the same.
The English are more prone than other groups to drop out of school early, to live on welfare benefits, to become unhealthy and to engage in crime. In measures of alcohol abuse, “trouble with police while drinking” and lawbreaking, they outrank any other ethnic group in Britain (except the Irish). Riots led by ethnic English youths tore the cities of England apart in the summer of 2011, while ethnic Turks, Bangladeshis and Africans guarded shops and became heroes for rescuing people from the riots. There is a constant sense that the poor English are about to break out in violence.
It might have something to do with sheer numbers. There are more people of English and Irish descent in Britain, than there are of Africans, Turks, Asians etc (at least for now) so it stands to reason that in “real numbers” they may very well riot more. However, if you were to compare on a “per capita” basis, I would bet that other groups commit far more trouble in proportion to their population sizes, especially when you bring in other serious crimes such as rapes, child molestation, and terrorism as well.
This was one thing when it was all kept inside the English community, but it is now beginning to affect Britain’s future. Growing numbers of the ethnic English are casting votes for the extremist UK Independence Party, which seeks to end immigration and pull Britain out of Europe. The party seems poised to capture a third of Britain’s seats in next year’s European Parliament elections.
UKIP are extremists now apparently -_-
They are unlikely to win seats in national elections – they tend to spoil the Tory vote – but their threat has caused the English community’s traditional party, the Conservatives, to become less moderate. Prime Minister David Cameron has recently taken a weird turn into anti-immigrant nastiness, denying benefits to newcomers (even though immigrants rarely claim unemployment benefits) and buying into an implausible media theory about Romanians and Bulgarians flooding the country, all to appease the ethnic English.
Why should newcomers be entitled to benefits, when they haven’t contributed anything to the pot? And if they really do so rarely claim benefits anyway, then why does it matter if they’re denied them? If they aren’t going to claim anyway, then they aren’t going to be affected by this decision. If they work for a while and then become unemployed later, they should be as entitled as anyone else to claim benefits, because they would have paid taxes through working at that point. Otherwise, fuck them. They don’t deserve anything just for showing up inside Britain’s borders.
These xenophobic attitudes are harming Britain’s economy. As the Economist recently wrote, the Prime Minister’s pledge to drive immigration below 100,000 a year has done serious damage – steep visa fees, quotas and restrictions have driven away foreign students, educated elites and investors, while many British companies are moving their operations overseas, where it’s easier to hire the best workers. And it is causing a fiscal crisis – according to the Office for Budget Responsibility, immigration rates will need to double if national debt is to be lowered to half its level (and UKIP’s immigration freeze would double public debt).
Britain needs more of these super geniuses in order to maintain their position in the world. Sure, the countries they come from are often miserable hellholes which they are seemingly unable to improve but somehow, they’re needed to make Britain great.
Don’t get me wrong about the English. I know quite a few English people who are rather decent (including my dear old Mum and Gran), and their culture is not without its charm. But they need help. Ethnic English numbers are growing, and if they’re allowed to gain any more influence in British society, they could be trouble.
And this is where it ends. It’s essentially satirising what people say about non-indigenous groups increasing in number and gaining influence, except it completely misses the point entirely as to why this is an issue. There is nothing wrong with Ethnic English growing in numbers in England, because England is their homeland, and they should be the ones to decide its path. England’s culture and values should be a representation of the Ethnic English people. If other, non-indigenous groups don’t like that, then they always have their own homelands, which they can return to quite freely if they choose. There is always a land where their cultures and values can be practiced and this isn’t under threat by the English people living in England. On the other hand, if Ethnic English people are surpassed in England by another ethnic group, who wish to impose their culture and values on England, then they have nowhere escape to. They have to submit to the will of the other group.